Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2008 Jun 13;48(3):299–308. doi: 10.1007/s12088-008-0024-3

Probiotics in aquaculture: importance and future perspectives

Maloy Kumar Sahu 1, N S Swarnakumar 1, K Sivakumar 1, T Thangaradjou 1, L Kannan 2
PMCID: PMC3476780  PMID: 23100726

Abstract

Aquaculture is one of the fastest developing growth sectors in the world and Asia presently contributes about 90% to the global production. However, disease outbreaks are constraint to aquaculture production thereby affects both economic development of the country and socio-economic status of the local people in many countries of Asia-Pacifi c region. Disease control in aquaculture industry has been achieved by following different methods using traditional ways, synthetic chemicals and antibiotics. However, the use of such expensive chemotherapeutants for controlling diseases has been widely criticized for their negative impacts like accumulation of residues, development of drug resistance, immunosuppressants and reduced consumer preference for aqua products treated with antibiotics and traditional methods are ineffective against controlling new diseases in large aquaculture systems. Therefore, alternative methods need to be developed to maintain a healthy microbial environment in the aquaculture systems there by to maintain the health of the cultured organisms. Use of probiotics is one of such method that is gaining importance in controlling potential pathogens. This review provides a summary of the criteria for the selection of the potential probiotics, their importance and future perspectives in aquaculture industry.

Keywords: Probiotics, Aquaculture, Finfish, Shellfish

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (619.3 KB).

References

  • 1.Balcazar J.L. Evaluation of probiotic bacterial strains in Litopenaeus vannamei. Guayaquil, Ecuador: National Center for Marine and Aquaculture Research; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.SCAN (2003) Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Animal Nutrition on the criteria for assessing the safety of microorganisms resistant to antibiotics of human clinical and veterinary importance. European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General
  • 3.Lewin C.S. Mechanisms of resistance development in aquatic microorganisms. In: Michel C., Alderman D.J., editors. Chemotherapy in Aquaculture: from Theory to Reality. Paris, France: Office International des Epizooties; 1992. pp. 288–301. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moriarty D. The role of microorganisms in aquaculture ponds. Aquaculture. 1997;151:333–349. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(96)01487-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Weber J.T., Mintz E.D., Canizares R., Semiglia A., Gomez I., Sempertegui R., Davila A., Greene K.D., Puhr N.D., Cameron D.N., Tenover F.C., Barrett T.J., Bean N.H., Ivey C., Tauxe R.V., Blake P.A. Epidemia cholera in Ecuador: multi-drug resistance and transmission by water and seafood. Epidemiol Infect. 1994;112:1–11. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800057368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Angulo F. Antimicrobial agents in aquaculture: potential impact on public health. APUA Newslett. 2000;18:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Parker R.B. Probiotics, the other half of the story. Animal Nutrition and Health. 1974;29:4–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fuller R. A review, probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bact. 1987;66:365–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gram L., Melchiorsen J., Spanggaard B., Huber I., Nielsen T.F. Inhibition of Vibrio anguillarum by Pseudomonas fluorescens AH2, a possible probiotic treatment of fish. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:969–973. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.3.969-973.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Salminen S., Ouwehand A., Benno Y., Lee Y.K. Probiotics: how should they be defined? Trends Food Sci Tech. 1999;10:107–110. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00027-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moriarty D.J.W. Diseases control in shrimp aquaculture with probiotic bacteria. In: Bell C.R., Brylinsky M., Johnson-Green P., editors. Microbial Biosystems: New Frontiers. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Microbial Ecology. Halifax, Canada: Atlantic Canada Society for Microbial Ecology; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Maeda M., Nogami K., Kanematsu M., Hirayama K. The concept of biological control methods in aquaculture. Hydrobiologia. 1997;358:285–290. doi: 10.1023/A:1003126129709. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Green A and Green M (2003) Probiotics in Asian Shrimp Aquaculture. Asian Aquaculture Magazine March and April: 28–29
  • 14.Huisint Veld J.H.J., Havenaar R., Marteau P. Establishing a scientific basis for probiotic R&D. Tibtech. 1994;12:6–8. doi: 10.1016/0167-7799(94)90004-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sotomayor M.A., Balcazar J.L. Inhibition of shrimp pathogenic vibrios by mixture of probiotic strain. Rev Aquat. 2003;19:9–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vine N.G., Leukes W.D., Kaiser H. In vitro growth characteristics of fi ve candidate aquaculture probiotics and two fish pathogens grown in fish intestinal mucus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;231:145–152. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00954-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dopazo C., Lemos M., Lodeiros C., Bolinches J., Barja J., Toranzo A. Inhibitory activity of antibiotic-producing marine bacteria against fish pathogens. J Appl Bacteri. 1988;65(Inhibitoryactivityofantibiotic-producingmarinebacteriaagainstfishpathogens):97–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb01497.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chythanya R., Karunasagar I., Karunasagar I. Inhibition of shrimp pathogenic vibrios by a marine Pseudomonas I-2 strain. Aquaculture. 2002;208:1–10. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00714-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Balcazar J., Blas I., Ruiz-Zarzuela I., Cunningham D., Vendrell D., Muzquiz J.L. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Vet Microbiol. 2006;114:173–186. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vine N.G., Leukes W.D., Kaiser H., Daya S., Baxter J., Hecht T. Competition for attachment of aquaculture candidate probiotic and pathogenic bacteria on fish intestinal mucus. J Fish Dis. 2004;27:319–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2004.00542.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gatesoupe F.J. The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture. 1999;180:147–165. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00187-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nageswara P.V., Babu D.E. Probiotics as an alternative therapy to minimize or avoid antibiotics use in aquaculture. Fishing Chimes. 2006;26(1):112–114. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Irianto A., Austin B. Use of probiotics to control furunculosis in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) J Fish Dis. 2002;25:1–10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2002.00327.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gibson L.F., Woodworth J., George A.M. Probiotic activity of Aeromonas media when challenged with Vibrio tubiashii. Aquaculture. 1998;169:111–120. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00369-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Douillet P.A., Langdon C.J. Use of probiotic for the culture of larvae of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas Thurnberg) Aquaculture. 1994;119:25–40. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(94)90441-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vaseeharan B., Ramasamy P. Control of pathogenic Vibrio spp. by Bacillus subtilis BT23, a possible probiotic treatment for black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003;36:83–87. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Joborn A., Olsson J.C., Westerdahl A., Conway P.L., Kjelleberg S. Colonization in the fish intestinal tract and production of inhibitory substances in intestinal mucus and faecal extracts by Carnobacterium sp. K1. J Fish Dis. 1997;20:383–392. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.1997.00316.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tovar D., Zambonino J., Cahu C., Gatesoupe F.J., Vazquez-Juarez R., Lesel R. Effect of yeast incorporation in compound diet on digestive enzyme activity in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larvae. Aquaculture. 2002;204:113–123. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00650-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chang C.I., Liu W.Y. An evaluation of two probiotics bacterial strains, Enterococcus faecium SF68 and Bacillus toyoi, for reducing edwardsiellosis in cultured European eel, Anguilla anguilla, L. J Fish Dis. 2002;25:311–315. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2002.00365.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gatesoupe F.J. Siderophore production and probiotics effect of Vibrio sp. associated with turbot larvae, Scophthalmus maximus. Aquatic Living Resources. 1991;10:239–246. doi: 10.1051/alr:1997026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nikoskelainen S., Ouwehand A., Salminen S., Bylund G. Protection of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from furunculosis by Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Aquaculture. 2001;198:229–236. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00593-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ruiz-Ponte C., Samain J.F., Sanchez J.L., Nicolas J.L. The benefit of a Roseobacter species on the survival of scallop larvae. Mar Biotech. 1999;1:52–59. doi: 10.1007/PL00011751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Scholz U., Garcia-Diaz G., Ricque D., Cruz-Suarez L.E., Vargas-Albores F., Latchford J. Enhancement of vibriosis resistance in juvenile Penaeus vannamei by supplementation of diets with different yeast products. Aquaculture. 1999;176:271–283. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00030-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Austin B., Stuckey L.F., Robertson P.A.W., Effendi I., Griffith D.R.W. A probiotic strain of Vibrio alginolyticus effective in reducing diseases caused by Aeromonas salmonicida, Vibrio anguillarum and Vibrio ordalii. J Fish Dis. 1995;18:93–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1995.tb01271.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Austin B., Baudet E., Stobie M.B.C. Inhibition of bacterial fish pathogens by Tetraselmis suecica. J Fish Dis. 1992;15:55–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1992.tb00636.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Byun J.W., Park S.C., Benno Y., Oh T.K. Probiotic effect of Lactobacillus sp. DS-12 in flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) J Gen Appl Microbio. 1997;43:305–308. doi: 10.2323/jgam.43.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vijayakumaran M. Probiotics in aquaculture. In: Menon N.G., Pillai P.P., editors. Perspectives in Mariculture. Cochin: The Marine Biological association of India; 2001. pp. 369–379. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Saurabh S., Choudhary A.K., Sushma G.S. Concept of probiotics in aquaculture. Fishing Chimes. 2005;25(4):19–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vanbelle M., Teller E., Focant M. Probiotics in animal nutrition: a review. Arch. Anim Nutr. 1990;40:543–567. doi: 10.1080/17450399009428406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Krovacek K.A., Ahne W., Masson I. Adhesion of Aeromonas hydrophila and Vibrio anguillarum to fish cells and to mucus coated glass slides. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1987;42:85–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02304.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ringo E., Gatesoupe F.J. Lactic acid bacteria in fish: a review. Aquaculture. 1998;160:177–203. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(97)00299-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sakata T. Microflora in the digestive tract of fish and shell-fish. In: Lesel R., editor. Microbiology in Poecilotherms. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1990. pp. 171–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ringo E., Strom E., Tabacheck J. Intestinal microflora of salmonids: a review. Aquacult Res. 1995;26:773–789. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.1995.tb00870.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Prieur G., Nicolas J.L., Plusquellec A., Vigneulle M. Interactions between bivalves molluscs and bacteria in the marine environment. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev. 1990;28:227–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang X., Li H., Zhang X., Li Y., Ji W., Xu H. Microbial flora in the digestive tract of tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) J Gen Appl Microbio. 2000;43:305–308. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dall W and Moriarty DJW (1983) Functional aspects of nutrition and digestion. In: The Biology of Crustacea, Vol 5 (Mantel LH ed). Internal Anatomy and Physiological Regulation. Academic Press
  • 48.Sakai M., Yoshida T., Astuta S., Kobayashi M. Enhancement of resistance to vibriosis in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) by oral administration of Clostridium butyricum bacteria. J Fish Dis. 1995;18:187–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1995.tb00276.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rengpipat S., Rukpratanporn S., Piyatiratitivorakul S., Menasaveta P. Immunity enhancement in black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) by a probiont bacterium (Bacillus S11) Aquaculture. 2000;191:271–288. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00440-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nikoskelainen S., Ouwehand A., Bylund G., Salminen S., Lilius E.M. Immune enhancement in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) by potential probiotic bacteria (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) Fish Shellfi sh Immunol. 2003;15:443–452. doi: 10.1016/S1050-4648(03)00023-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hagopian D.S., Riley J.G. A closer look at the bacteriology of nitrification. Aquacult Eng. 1998;18:223–244. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8609(98)00032-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Skjolstrup J., Nielsen P.H., Frier J.O., McLean E. Performance characteristics of 16 fluidised bed biofilters in a novel laboratory-scale recirculation system for rainbow trout: 17 nitrifi cation rates, oxygen consumption and sludge collection. Aquacult Eng. 1998;18:265–276. doi: 10.1016/S0144-8609(98)00037-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fukami K., Nishijima T., Ishida Y. Stimulative and inhibitory effects of bacteria on the growth of microalgae. Hydrobiologia. 1997;358:185–191. doi: 10.1023/A:1003139402315. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kamei Y., Yoshimizu M., Ezura Y., Kimura T. Screening of bacteria with antiviral activity from fresh water salmonid hatcheries. Microbiol Immunol. 1988;32:67–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1988.tb01366.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Girones R., Jofre J.T., Bosch A. Isolation of marine bacteria with antiviral properties. Can J Microbiol. 1989;35:1015–1021. doi: 10.1139/m89-169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rengpipat S., Phianphak W., Piyatiratitivorakul S., Menasaveta P. Effects of a probiotic bacterium in black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon survival and growth. Aquaculture. 1998;167:301–313. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00305-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Phianphak W., Rengpipat S., Piyatiratitivorakul S., Menasveta P. Probiotic use of Lactobacillus spp. for black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon. J Sci Res Chula Univ. 1999;24:42–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gullian M., Thompson F., Rodrýguez J. Selection of probiotic bacteria and study of their immunostimulatory effect in Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2004;233:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.09.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Alavandi S.V., Vijayan K.K., Santiago T.C., Poornima M., Jithendran K.P., Ali S.A., Rajan J.J.S. Evaluation of Pseudomonas sp. PM11 and Vibrio fluviales PM17 on immune indices of tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2004;17:115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2003.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Baliao DD (2000) Environmental-friendly schemes in intensive shrimp farming. SEAFDEC (South east Asia Fisheries Development Centre) and ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Nations)
  • 62.Nogami K., Hamasaki K., Maeda M., Hirayama K. Biocontrol method in aquaculture for rearing the swimming crab larvae Protunus trituberculatus. Hydrobiologia. 1997;358:291–295. doi: 10.1023/A:1003149306511. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Moriarty D.J.W. Control of luminous Vibrio species in penaeid aquaculture ponds. Aquaculture. 1998;164:351–358. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00199-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Queiroz J.F., Boyd C.E. Effects of a bacterial inoculums in channel catfish ponds. J World Aquacult Soc. 1998;29:67–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-7345.1998.tb00300.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Berg R.D. Probiotics, prebiotics or ‘conbiotics’? Trends Microbiol. 1998;6:89–92. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(98)01224-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Atlas R.M. Probiotics — snake oil for the new millennium. Environ Microbiol. 1999;1:377–382. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.1999.00063.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Marahiel M.A., Nakano M.M., Zuber P. Regulation of peptide antiobiotic production in Bacillus. Mol Microbiol. 1993;7:631–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01154.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Duffy B.K., Defago G. Environmental factors modulating antibiotic and siderophore biosynthesis by Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:2429–2438. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.6.2429-2438.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Msadek T. When the going gets tough: survival strategies and environmental signaling networks in Bacillus subtilis. Trends Microbiol. 1999;7:201–207. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01479-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ellis R., Timms-Wilson T.M., Bailey M.J. Identifi cation of conserved traits in fluorescent pseudomonads with antifungal activity. Environ Microbiol. 2000;2:274–284. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00102.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Buysens S., Heungens K., Poppe J., Hofte M. Involvement of pyochelin and pyoverdin in suppression of pythium-induced damping-off of tomato by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:865–871. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.3.865-871.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Spanggaard B., Huber I., Nielsen J., Sick E.B., Slierendrecht W.J., Gram L. Antagonism of the indigenous fish microflora against Vibrio anguillarum and subsequent use of non-pathogenic cultures in protection against vibriosis. Environ Microbiol. 2001;3:755–765. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES