Skip to main content
The Indian Journal of Surgery logoLink to The Indian Journal of Surgery
. 2012 Mar 22;74(5):401–406. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0426-7

Diagnosis and Management of Choledochal Cysts

Chiranjiv Khandelwal 1, Utpal Anand 2,, Bindey kumar 3, Rajeev N Priyadarshi 4
PMCID: PMC3477414  PMID: 24082594

Abstract

Choledochal cysts are rare disease and of unknown etiology. These are typically a surgical problem of infancy and childhood, but in nearly 20 % of the patients the diagnosis is delayed until adulthood. The presentation and therapeutic strategies for choledochal cysts in adult may differ from that of childhood. The surgical management of choledochal cysts in adults is complicated by associated hepatobiliary pathology. Despite the absence of clinical trials, a consensus for the management of choledochal cysts is excision. This review examines the spectrum of hepatobiliary pathology encountered with choledochal cysts and the surgical alternatives for managing choledochal cysts based on review of relevant literature in English language indexed on MEDLINE.

Keywords: Choledochal cyst, Hepaticojejunostomy, Cholangiocarcinoma, Pancreatitis, Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)

Introduction

Choledochal cysts are congenital anomalies of the bile ducts and are defined as abnormal, disproportionate, and cystic dilatation of the biliary duct. The incidence of bile duct cysts ranges from 1 in 13,000 to 1 in 2 million births [1]. More than 60 % of them present during the first year of life. A proportion of them present in adulthood and their presentations differ compared to childhood cases [2]. There is a higher incidence in females [3, 4]. The presentation is often vague and nonspecific. However, the diagnosis is facilitated by modern imaging techniques. Some aspects of optimal management are still controversial.

Classification

Alonso-Lej et al. published the first systematic description of choledochal cysts, based on the clinical and anatomic findings in 96 cases in 1959 [5]. They classified choledochal cysts into three types and described the therapeutic strategies for each type. This classification was further refined by Todani and colleagues who included five major types and several subtypes [6]. Type I cysts are a dilatation of the extrahepatic bile duct. These are the most common type and seen in 75–85 % cases [7, 8]. Type I cysts may be further classified as cystic (IA), focal (IB), or fusiform (IC). Type II cysts are diverticulum of the common bile duct. Type III cysts are represented by a cystic dilatation of the intramural portion of the common bile duct known as choledochoceles. Type IVA lesions involve both the intra- and extrahepatic portions of the bile ducts, and type IVB lesions are multiple cysts limited to the extrahepatic bile ducts. Type IV-A cysts are the second most common type after type I. Type V cysts synonymous with Caroli disease describe the abnormalities of the intrahepatic bile ducts resulting in multiple segmental intrahepatic cystic biliary dilatations.

Histopathology

Histopathologically, the type I, II, and IV choledochal cysts are similar and consist of a wall of dense collagenous tissue with smooth muscle bundles. A mucosal lining may be entirely absent or may present in a patchy distribution. Some degree of inflammatory reaction is usually present. Type III cysts are usually lined with duodenal type mucosa but may be covered with a mucosa similar to that of the bile duct.

Etiology

Choledochal cysts are believed to be congenital in origin; however, exact etiology remains unknown. Multiple etiologic theories have been proposed for the origin of choledochal cysts. The most widely accepted theory is that cystic dilatation of bile ducts is related to an anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal union (APBDU) [9]. An APBDU is defined as abnormal union of the pancreatic duct and the common bile duct located far from the duodenum, leading to a long common channel. Therefore, the action of the sphincter of Oddi is affected, and pancreaticobiliary reflux occurs, resulting in various pathological conditions in the biliary tract and the pancreas such as inflammation, ectasia, and ultimately dilatation. In experimental canine studies, anastomosis of the common bile duct to the pancreatic duct resulted in progressive dilatation of the common bile duct supports this theory [10]. However, the possibility of anastomotic stricture following such challenging surgery, may result in the dilatation rather than pancreatic juice reflux, cannot be ruled out. APBDU is detected in 57–96 % of cases of choledochal cysts, and therefore cannot account for the minority of cases with normal ductal entry into the ampulla of Vater [1113].

Obstruction of the common bile duct is another etiological theory for choledochal cysts and is also supported by other animal models. In neonatal animal models, ligation of the common bile duct causes a dilatation, morphologically resembling a type I choledochal cyst, whereas in adults, generalized dilatation of the whole biliary system can be seen [14].

Recently, abnormal function and spasm of the sphincter of Oddi has been noted to be associated with choledochal cysts [15, 16]. The abnormal function of the sphincter of Oddi may result in a functional obstruction to the common bile duct, thus predisposing to choledochal cysts. This functional obstruction at the sphincter of Oddi also predisposes to pancreatic juice reflux into the biliary tree.

Kusunoki et al showed that abnormally a few ganglion cells in the narrow portion of the common bile duct in patients with a choledochal cyst would result in a functional obstruction and proximal dilatation in the same manner as achalasia of the esophagus or Hirschprung disease [17].

There are a few reports of familial cases of choledochal cysts and associated anomalies [18].

It could be concluded from evidences that some anatomical or functional obstruction in distal common bile duct and raised intraductal biliary pressure are the most likely causes of choledochal cysts.

Type IVA cysts are more common in adults than in children, raising the possibility that although the lesions may be congenital, they may progress with time [19].

Clinical Presentation

The classical triad of jaundice, right upper quadrant mass, and abdominal pain is present in only a minority of patients (0–17 %) [2022]. It is more commonly seen in children than in adults, and 85 % of children have at least two features of the triad at presentation, compared with only 25 % of adults [23]. Other presenting features of choledochal cysts are cholangitis, pancreatitis, and biliary peritonitis from cyst rupture [21, 2426].

Investigation

Ultrasound (US) is the best initial method for evaluating the entire intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary system and gall bladder. US shows a choledochal cyst as a characteristic cystic or fusiform dilatation of the common hepatic duct or the intrahepatic ducts or sometimes a cyst in the porta hepatis, separate from the gallbladder. It can also demonstrate the associated complication such as cystolithiasis, cholangitis, and malignancy. US is less accurate for the specific diagnosis of bile duct cysts in adults who have more secondary malignant and benign causes for bile duct dilatation. Computed tomography (CT) is infrequently required when distal common bile duct (CBD) is not visualized due to bowel gas. Ultrasound and CT are excellent modalities for detecting cystic lesions in the right upper abdomen and for assessing their size and extent, but the biliary origin of the cyst may not be always reliably commented. The presence of intrahepatic ductal dilatation provides an important clue. The gastrointestinal duplication cyst, omental cyst, mesenteric cyst, hepatic cyst, and pancreatic pseudocyst are other main radiological differential diagnosis of a large cystic lesion at the porta hepatis.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) are the diagnostic methods of choice for biliary ductal pathology [1, 27]. MRCP is emerging as a highly sensitive, safe, and preoperative noninvasive diagnostic technique for the detection of choledochal cysts. MRCP is rapidly replacing diagnostic ERCP in various pancreaticobiliary diseases. MRCP may also supersede the diagnostic role of ERCP in patients with choledochal cysts. However, MRCP has shown limited capacity to detect associated ductal anomalies or small choledochoceles [28]. MRCP is not useful in pediatric patients who are not able to hold breath for a few seconds, a requisite for breath-hold MRCP sequences. In clinical practice, MRCP is recommended before ERCP in patients suspected of having choledochal cysts on US.

Associated Hepatobiliary Pathology

Cystolithiasis

Cystolithiasis is the most common accompanying condition in adults with choledochal cysts. The prevalence of intracystic stones ranges from 2 to 72 % in adults [29]. Most intracystic stones have been described as soft, earthy, and pigmented in appearance, supporting the bile stasis as a primary etiologic factor.

Hepaticolithiasis has been recognized by increasing frequency with long-term follow-up and may occur with or without evidence of anastomotic stricture [30]. Usually hepaticolithiasis occurs in type IVA choledochal cysts. A study has shown that more than 80 % of type IVA choledochal cysts are associated with a membranous or septal stenosis of the major lobar bile ducts near the confluence favoring hepaticolithiasis [31].

Pancreatitis

This is a common presentation of choledochal cysts particularly in adults. This may be due to the activation of pancreatic enzymes by bile reflux, in association with an anomalous pancreaticobiliary union and the presence of cystolithiasis and cholelithiasis [32].

Cholangitis

With pancreatitis, cholangitis is a common complication of choledochal cysts and may be the presenting feature as mentioned earlier. It is also a commonly reported complication after surgical management.

Portal Hypertension

Portal hypertension associated with choledochal cysts may be due to secondary biliary cirrhosis or fibrosis, portal vein thrombosis, or Caroli disease with congenital hepatic fibrosis [33]. This has been reported to be the presenting feature in 10 % of children in one series [21].

Malignancy

Malignancies of the hepatobiliary tract arising in or associated with choledochal cysts are cholangiocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma, adenoacanthoma, squamous cell carcinoma, anaplastic carcinoma, bile duct sarcoma, hepatoma, pancreatic carcinoma, and gallbladder carcinoma.

Malignancies associated with choledochal cysts may arise within the cyst or elsewhere within the liver or pancreaticobiliary tract. Malignancies may be associated with any type of bile cysts although prevalence of cancer is significantly greater in type I and IV cysts. The etiology of cyst-associated malignancies is unknown. Bile stagnation and the development of intrabiliary carcinogens leading to epithelial malignant degeneration is postulated as the most common mechanism.

The prognosis for patients with cholangiocarcinoma arising in choledochal cysts is as grim as for cholangiocarcinoma in general, with median survival reported in the range of 6–21 months [2, 34, 35]. Malignant change in association with choledochal cysts has been reported in pediatric cases, and it should therefore be suspected in any choledochal cyst appearing after infancy [36].

The incidence of gallbladder carcinoma in patients with ductal malunion without choledochal cyst (forme frusta choledochal cyst) was 50 % in one study, and only 5 % in patients with malunion and choledochal cysts [37]. In the patients without cysts, all the biliary malignancies were in the gallbladder, whereas in the patients with cysts, in addition to the 5 % with gallbladder cancer, 14 % had cholangiocarcinoma arising in the cyst.

It has been demonstrated that the histological changes in choledochal cysts progress with patient age at presentation through epithelial denudement to inflammatory infiltrates, glandular metaplasia, and ultimately malignancy [38].

Management

General Principles

The surgical management of choledochal cysts is based on the cyst type and associated hepatobiliary pathology. In general, all bile duct cysts should be excised and bile flow is re-established by mucosa-to-mucosa biliary-enteric anastomosis. External drainage alone has no definitive role in the surgical management of choledochal cysts. Long-term follow-up must be maintained in adults because of the age-related risk of malignancy and the frequency of late anastomotic strictures in patients treated without cyst resection.

Type I Cyst

The treatment of choice of type I bile duct cysts in adults is total cystectomy and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The advantages of this procedure include a reduced incidence of anastomotic strictures, stone formation, cholangitis, and intracystic malignancy.

The clinical results of total cystectomy and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy have been excellent. Morbidity and mortality have not been greater than that of drainage by Roux-en-Y choledochocystojejunostomy [35]. Recurrent cholangitis due to anastomotic strictures has been reported in 10–25 % of patients [29]. Although reduction of malignancy by cyst excision has been suggested by some series, cancer has developed after cyst excision.

Technically, cyst excision in adults can be carried out by initially mobilizing the gallbladder from liver bed to dissect the cyst away from hilar structures. Identification of portal vein and isolation and control of hepatic artery are done before dissection of the posterior wall of the cyst, especially if hypervascularity and dense adhesions are encountered. Before division of cysts, the distal cyst is dissected from the pancreas to identify the pancreaticobiliary ductal junction. The cyst is transected distally within the head of pancreas, and the distal bile duct is carefully ligated just proximal to its junction with the pancreatic duct. Biliary-enteric flow is re-established through a wide mucosa-to-mucosa Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy at the level of the hilum.

Laparoscopic treatment for type I choledochal cysts has been reported and warrants further evaluation [39, 40].

Portal hypertension due to secondary biliary cirrhosis and inflammatory adhesions from severe pancreatitis or past drainage procedures rarely precludes cyst excision. Roux-en-Y choledochocystojejunostomy is the preferred alternative treatment in such circumstances. Portal decompression by central splenorenal shunt followed by drainage surgery after 6–12 weeks is sometimes required. In older patients with repeated cholangitis and marked pericystic inflammation, this disease may be best managed with resection of the anterolateral part of the cyst followed by an endocystic resection of the lining, leaving the back wall adjacent to the portal vein in place, as reported by Lilly [41].

If patients have previously been treated by a cyst-enterotomy internal drainage procedure, 70 % of them require reoperation for the occurrence of complications, including cholangitis and hepatolithiasis [29]. Indeed, it has been recommended that patients who have previously undergone internal drainage procedures should undergo reoperation with cyst excision (even if asymptomatic) as prophylaxis against complications in particular cases of malignant cysts, even though the complications of surgery for excision after previous internal drainage procedure are more frequent than those seen after primary cyst excision [42, 43].

Type II Cyst

Treatment for type II cysts arising as a lateral diverticulum of the common bile duct is surgical excision. Depending on the size of neck of the cyst at the junction with the common bile duct, the neck may be closed primarily or with T-tube decompression of the common bile duct. However, when these cysts arise from the intrapancreatic portion of the common bile duct, drainage into the duodenum is technically easier. A few patients have this type of choledochal cyst, so no large experience has been reported.

Type III Cyst

Choledochoceles are the true cyst of the distal common bile duct protruding into duodenum. Patients present with biliary colic, cholangitis, or pancreatitis. Until recently transduodenal cyst excision with or without sphincterotomy was the treatment of choice [44]. Since the common bile duct and the major pancreatic duct open into the cyst, careful attention is necessary to protect these ducts and reanastomose them to the duodenal mucosa. Now, endoscopic sphincterotomy and cyst unroofing have become the treatment of choice [4548]. Although transduodenal excision eliminates the risk of malignancy, the fact that only three cases of carcinoma is reported in choledochocele, the risk of cancer alone unjustifies the treatment by surgery [44].

Type IV Cyst

The extrahepatic component of type IVA and IVB cysts is approached as a type I choledochal cyst. Transduodenal sphincteroplasty and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy complete the treatment for type IVB choledochal cysts, which have choledochocele component. The extent of the resection in type IVA cysts is controversial. Several authors advocate management by excision of the extrahepatic component, only with hepaticoenterostomy [49, 50]. However, malignancy has been reported to arise in the intrahepatic cysts as described above, and it has also been reported to occur after resection of the extrahepatic cyst with hepaticojejunostomy [51]. Clearly, when the intrahepatic cysts are widespread, they cannot be excised; however, when the intrahepatic disease is localized, it would seem reasonable to perform the relevant partial hepatectomy. For the same reason, partial hepatectomy has been practiced for Caroli disease.

There is a report of cylindrical intrahepatic ductal dilatation in type IVA disease regressing spontaneously after common duct excision and hepaticojejunostomy, compared with cystic intrahepatic disease, which does not regress [52]. However, it seems likely that the cylindrical intrahepatic disease represents a type I cyst with an element of obstruction causing proximal dilatation, rather than a true type IVA disease.

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

None.

Funding sources

None.

References

  • 1.Söreide K, Körner H, Havnen J, Söreide JA. Bile duct cysts in adults. Br J Surg. 2004;91(12):1538–1548. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, Lam CM, Poon RT, Wong J. Choledochal cysts in adults. Arch Surg. 2002;137(4):465–468. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.4.465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Watanatittan S, Niramis R. Choledochal cyst: review of 74 pediatric cases. J Med Assoc Thai. 1998;81(8):586–595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen HM, Jan YY, Chen MF, et al. Surgical treatment of choledochal cyst in adults: results and long-term follow-up. Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;43(12):1492–1499. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alonso-Lej F, Rever WB, Jr, Pessagno DJ. Congenital choledochal cysts, with a report of 2, and an analysis of 94 cases. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1959;108:1–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, Tabuchi K, Okajima K. Congenital bile duct cysts: classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg. 1977;134(2):263–269. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90359-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Flanigan DP. Biliary cysts. Ann Surg. 1975;182(5):635–643. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197511000-00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yamaguchi M. Congenital choledochal cyst. Analysis of 1,433 patients in the Japanese literature. Am J Surg. 1980;140(5):653–657. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90051-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Babbitt DP. Congenital choledochal cysts: new etiological concepts on anomalous relationships of the common bile duct and pancreatic bulb. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1969;12(3):231–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ohkawa H, Sawaguchi S, Yamazaki Y, Ishikawa A, Kikuchi M. Experimental analysis of the ill effect of anomalous pancreaticobilliary ductal union. J Pediatr Surg. 1982;17(1):7–13. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3468(82)80316-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Swisher SG, Cates JA, Hunt KK, et al. Pancreatitis associated with adult choledochal cysts. Pancreas. 1994;9(5):633–637. doi: 10.1097/00006676-199409000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stringer MD, Dhawan A, Davenport M, Mieli-Vergani G, Mowat AP, Howard ER. Choledochal cysts: lessons from a 20-year experience. Arch Dis Child. 1995;73(6):528–531. doi: 10.1136/adc.73.6.528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Song HK, Kim MH, Myung SJ, et al. Choledochal cyst associated with anomalous union of pancreaticobiliary duct (AUPBD) has a more grave clinical course than choledochal cyst alone. Korean J Intern Med. 1999;14(2):1–8. doi: 10.3904/kjim.1999.14.2.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Spitz L. Experimental production of cystic dilatation of the common bile duct in lambs. J Pediatr Surg. 1977;12(1):39–42. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(77)90293-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Imazu M, Iwai N, Tokiwa K, Shimotake T, Kimura O, Ono S. Factors of biliary carcinogenesis in choledochal cysts. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2001;11(1):24–27. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-12190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schweizer P, Schweizer M. Pancreaticobiliary long common channel syndrome and congenital anomalous dilatation of the choledochal duct: study of 46 patients. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1993;3(1):15–21. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1063500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kusunoki M, Saitoh N, Yamamura T, Fujita S, Takahashi T, Utsunomiya J. Choledochal cysts: oligoganglionosis in the narrow portion of the choledochus. Arch Surg. 1988;123(8):984–986. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400320070014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Iwata F, Uchida A, Miyaki T, et al. Familial occurrence of congenital bile duct cysts. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;13(3):316–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1998.01562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Todani T, Narusue M, Watanabe Y, Tabuchi K, Okajima K. Management of congenital choledochal cyst with intrahepatic involvement. Ann Surg. 1978;187(3):272–280. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197803000-00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sherman P, Kolster E, Davies C, Stringer D, Weber J. Choledochal cysts: heterogeneity of clinical presentation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986;5(6):867–872. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198611000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Samuel M, Spitz L. Choledochal cyst: varied clinical presentations and long-term results of surgery. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1996;6(2):78–81. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1066476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rattan KN, Khurana P, Budhiraja S, Malik V, Pandit SK. Choledochal cyst: a 10-year experience. Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67(9):657–659. doi: 10.1007/BF02762178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lipsett PA, Pitt HA, Colombani PM, Boitnott JK, Cameron JL. Choledochal cyst disease: a changing pattern of presentation. Ann Surg. 1994;220(5):644–652. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199411000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Seema SA, Seth A, Taluja V, Bagga D, Aneja S. Spontaneous rupture of choledochal cyst. Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67(2):155–156. doi: 10.1007/BF02726192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lin SL, Shan KM, Hung YB, Ng SH, Lin CY. Choledochal cyst associated with acute acalculous cholecystitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;31(3):307–308. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200009000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ando K, Miyano T, Kohno S, Takamizawa S, Lane G. Spontaneous perforation of choledochal cyst: a study of 13 cases. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1998;8(1):23–25. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1071113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Metcalfe MS, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ. Management dilemmas with choledochal cysts. Arch Surg. 2003;138(3):333–339. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.3.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Park DH, Kim MH, Lee SK, et al. Can MRCP replace the diagnostic role of ERCP for patients with choledochal cysts? Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62(3):360–366. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chijiiwa K, Koga A. Surgical management and long-term follow-up of patients with choledochal cysts. Am J Surg. 1993;165(2):238–242. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80518-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Uno K, Tsuchida Y, Kawarasaki H, Ohmiya H, Honna T. Development of intrahepatic cholelithiasis long after primary excision of choledochal cysts. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183(6):583–588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ando H, Ito T, Kaneko K, Seo T, Ito F. Intrahepatic bile duct stenosis causing intrahepatic calculi formation following excision of a choledochal cyst. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183(1):56–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nakamura T, Okada A, Higaki J, Tojo H, Okamoto M. Pancreaticobiliary maljunction-associated pancreatitis: an experimental study on the activation of pancreatic phospholipase A2. World J Surg. 1996;20(5):543–550. doi: 10.1007/s002689900084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Martin LW, Rowe GA. Portal hypertension secondary to choledochal cyst. Ann Surg. 1979;190:638–639. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197911000-00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jan YY, Chen HM, Chen MF. Malignancy in choledochal cysts. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47(32):337–340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stain SC, Guthrie CR, Yellin AE, Donovan AJ. Choledochal cyst in the adult. Ann Surg. 1995;222(2):128–133. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199508000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Iwai N, Deguchi E, Yanagihara J, et al. Cancer arising in a choledochal cyst in a 12-year-old girl. J Pediatr Surg. 1990;25(12):1261–1263. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(90)90525-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chijiiwa K, Kimura H, Tanaka M. Malignant potential of the gallbladder in patients with anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction: the difference in risk between patients with and without choledochal cyst. Int Surg. 1995;80(1):61–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Komi N, Tamura T, Tsuge S, Miyoshi Y, Udaka H, Takehara H. Relation of patient age to premalignant alterations in choledochal cyst epithelium: histochemical and immunohistochemical studies. J Pediatr Surg. 1986;21(5):430–433. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3468(86)80514-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shimura H, Tanaka M, Shimizu S, Mizumoto K. Laparoscopic treatment of congenital choledochal cyst. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(10):1268–1271. doi: 10.1007/s004649900834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tanaka M, Shimizu S, Mizumoto K, et al. Laparoscopically assisted resection of choledochal cyst and Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(6):545–552. doi: 10.1007/s004640000380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lilly JR. Total excision of choledochal cyst. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978;146(2):254–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chaudhary A, Dhar P, Sachdev A. Reoperative surgery for choledochal cysts. Br J Surg. 1997;84(6):781–784. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800840611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kaneko K, Ando H, Watanabe Y, et al. Secondary excision of choledochal cysts after previous cyst-enterostomies. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46(29):2772–2775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lopez RR, Pinson CW, Campbell JR, Harrison M, Katon RM. Variation in management based on type of choledochal cyst. Am J Surg. 1991;161(5):612–615. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90911-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Elton E, Hanson BL, Biber BP, Howell DA. Dilated common channel syndrome: endoscopic diagnosis, treatment, and relationship to choledochocele formation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47(6):471–478. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70247-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Adamek HE, Schilling D, Weitz M, Riemann JF. Choledochocele imaged with magnetic resonance cholangiography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(4):1082–1083. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01867.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Siegel EG, Folsch UR. Primary sclerosing cholangitis mimicking choledocal cyst type 1 in a young patient. Endoscopy. 1999;31(2):200–203. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-13670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Samavedy R, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Endoscopic therapy in anomalous pancreatobiliary duct junction. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50(5):623–627. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)80009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hewitt PM, Krige JE, Bornman PC, Terblanche J. Choledochal cysts in adults. Br J Surg. 1995;82(3):382–385. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Belli G, Rotondano G, D’Agostino A, Iannelli A, Marano I, Santangelo ML. Cystic dilation of extrahepatic bile ducts in adulthood: diagnosis, surgical treatment and long-term results. HPB Surg. 1998;10(6):379–384. doi: 10.1155/1998/90178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kobayashi S, Asano T, Yamasaki M, Kenmochi T, Nakagohri T, Ochiai T. Risk of bile duct carcinogenesis after excision of extrahepatic bile ducts in pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Surgery. 1999;126(5):939–944. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70036-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Thambi Dorai CR, Visvanathan R, McAll GL. Type IVa choledochal cysts: surgical management and literature review. Aust N Z J Surg. 1991;61(7):505–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1991.tb00278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Indian Journal of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES