Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Bioconjug Chem. 2012 Sep 26;23(10):1989–2006. doi: 10.1021/bc3003309

Biomarkers and Molecular Probes for Cell Death Imaging and Targeted Therapeutics

Bryan A Smith 1, Bradley D Smith 1,*
PMCID: PMC3477794  NIHMSID: NIHMS409989  PMID: 22989049

Abstract

Cell death is a critically important biological process. Disruption of homeostasis, either by excessive or deficient cell death, is a hallmark of many pathological conditions. Recent research advances have greatly increased our molecular understanding of cell death and its role in a range of diseases and therapeutic treatments. Central to these ongoing research and clinical efforts is the need for imaging technologies that can locate and identify cell death in a wide array of in vitro and in vivo biomedical samples with varied spatiotemporal requirements. This review article summarizes community efforts over the past five years to identify useful biomarkers for dead and dying cells, and to develop molecular probes that target these biomarkers for optical, radionuclear, or magnetic resonance imaging. Apoptosis biomarkers are classified as either intracellular (caspase enzymes, mitochondrial membrane potential, cytosolic proteins) or extracellular (plasma membrane phospholipids, membrane potential, surface exposed histones). Necrosis, autophagy, and senescence biomarkers are described, as well as unexplored cell death biomarkers. The article discusses possible chemotherapeutic and theranostic strategies, and concludes with a summary of current challenges and expected eventual rewards of clinical cell death imaging.

Keywords: Apoptosis, necrosis, autophagy, senescence, molecular imaging, optical imaging, nuclear imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, contrast agent, theranostic

Introduction

Cell death is an essential biological process that plays a vital physiological and pathological role within an organism. Programmed cell death is critical for the correct formation of organs and tissues during development and also functions to rid the body of cells that have been infected or damaged by pathogens. During our lifetime, over 99.9% of our cells will undergo cell death and be eliminated by the body; thus, providing an important mechanism for maintaining homeostasis and a process for fighting disease (1). Disruption of homeostasis, either by excessive or deficient cell death, is a hallmark of many pathological conditions including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune diseases, and others that are listed in Figure 1 (2,3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Medical fields and diseases that are associated with dysregulation of cell death.

Cell death is often divided into two distinctive processes, apoptosis and necrosis; however, there is increasing evidence for additional pathways such as autophagy, mitotic catastrophe, and senescence (48). Apoptosis is characterized by classical morphology changes such as cytoplasm shrinkage, cell detachment, chromatin condensation, nuclear fragmentation and the formation of apoptotic bodies. In contrast, necrotic cells exhibit increased cytoplasmic vacuolation, organelle degeneration, condensation of chromatin into irregular patches, and an increase in cell volume that results in irreversible rupture of the plasma membrane. Biochemically, apoptotic cell death includes activation of caspases, mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization, DNA fragmentation, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP) and exposure of molecular biomarkers such as phosphatidylserine (PS) on the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane. Unambiguous assignment of a cell death process is a challenging task, since different death processes can induce the same change in one biomarker. For example, PS exposure, ROS generation, and LMP are biomarkers associated with both apoptosis and necrosis (911). There is also evidence for crosstalk between multiple death processes that are occurring simultaneously (12).

The ongoing efforts of a large international group of biomedical researchers are greatly expanding the collective understanding of cell death and its role in a range of diseases and therapeutic treatments. Central to these research and clinical efforts is the need for imaging and detection technologies that can locate and identify cell death in a wide array of in vitro and in vivo biomedical samples with vastly different spatiotemporal requirements (Figure 2). Ideally, these technologies should be able to quantify the biomarkers that are specific for each cell death process. A common strategy for effective molecular imaging, especially in the clinic, is to employ a suitably designed molecular probe that is comprised of a targeting group conjugated to a reporter group. In addition to the normal probe development challenges of obtaining high target selectivity and sensitivity, cell death imaging has the additional complication that it is a time dependent process (Figure 3). A high contrast image must be achieved within a specific window in time that will depend on the specifics of the cell death phenomenon under study. Therefore, a single cell death imaging probe will not likely be applicable for all types of imaging problems. A more realistic solution is a palette of cell death imaging methods with complementary operational attributes. The goal of this review is to summarize recent community efforts to identify useful cell death biomarkers for each type of cell death process and to develop molecular imaging probes and therapeutics that target these biomarkers. The focus is on methods that allow imaging of cell culture or living animals, and the scope does not include diagnostic assays or stains for biopsy or histopathology sections. Also not discussed are imaging methods that monitor changes in uptake of molecular probes for cell metabolism (e.g., 18F-FDG, 11C-choline) or cell proliferation (e.g., 18F-FLT) (13, 14). The emphasis is on recent advances that have occurred within the last five years; thus, the article builds on previous reviews (1520).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cell death imaging is conducted on various biomedical subjects ranging from cells to humans. Reprinted with permission from references 3, 76, 89, 117.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Development of a successful in vivo imaging probe for cell death requires global optimization of a large set of interdependent parameters.

Current Cell Death Biomarkers and Imaging Modalities

In Figure 4 is a short summary of currently validated cell death biomarkers for molecular imaging. A more detailed listing in Table 1 contains additional information including the imaging modality. Most cell death imaging studies employ one of three modalities: optical, radionuclear, or magnetic resonance imaging. These modalities have complementary properties that make them suitable for different types of in vivo imaging applications (Table 2) (21). Optical imaging can be broken into two groups, fluorescence and bioluminescence. Fluorescence is well suited for diagnostic and microscopy studies of cells and tissue sections. A rich assortment of targeted fluorescent probes has been developed, including fluorescent reagents that are activated by enzymes (22).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Validated intracellular and extracellular biomarkers for cell death imaging.

Table 1.

Cell Death Biomarkers and Probe Targeting Groups

Biomarker Type of Cell Death Targeting Group Imaging Modalities Ref
Effector Caspases Apoptosis DEVD sequencea BLI, Fluorescence 3048
Isatinsb PET 50, 51, 53,54
Acyloxymethyl ketonesb Fluorescence 56
Phosphatidylserine Apoptosis, Necrosis Annexin Vc,e Fluorescence, PET, SPECT, MRI, Ultrasound 7478, 80,81 83, 8590, 9294, 96, 97
C2A domain of Synaptotagminc Fluorescence, PET, SPECT, 98102
Lactadherinc Fluorescence, SPECT 103105
LIKKPFa MRI 106110
TLVSSLa MRI 108, 109
CLSYYPSY a Fluorescence 111
SVSVGMKPSPRPa Fluorescence 112
FNFRLKAGAKIRFGa Fluorescence, SPECT 113
cLac-2a Fluorescence 114
ZnDPAb Fluorescence, SPECT, MRI 115124
Zn-cyclenb Fluorescence, PET 125
Phosphatidylethanolamine Apoptosis, Necrosis Duramycina Fluorescence, SPECT 127129
Histones Apoptosis CQRPPR (Apopep-1)a Fluorescence, PET 137, 138, 207, 208
Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Apoptosis Phosphonium cationsb PET 64, 65
La Antigen Late Apoptosis, Necrosis La mAb 3B9d Fluorescence, SPECT 68, 69
APOMAB®
DAB4d
SPECT 70
Heat Shock Proteins Late Apoptosis, Necrosis GSAO b SPECT 71
Autophagosome Autophagy LC3c Fluorescence 174177
Exposed DNA Necrosis Hoechst-IRb Fluorescence 150
Gd-TOb Fluorescence, MRI 151, 152
Plasma Membrane Depolarization Apoptosis DDCb Fluorescence 139141
ML-10b,e Fluorescence, PET 144147
DFNSHb Fluorescence, PET 142, 143
Unknown Necrosis Hypericinb Fluorescence, PET, SPECT, 154–156, 158, 159
Pamoic Acidb PET, SPECT 160, 161
bis-DTPA-BI b SPECT 162
a

peptide

b

small molecule

c

protein

d

antibody

e

clinical studies

Table 2.

Strengths and Weaknesses of In Vivo Imaging Modalities.

Imaging Modality Strengths Weaknesses
Fluorescence
  • High sensitivity

  • Low cost

  • High-throughput

  • Easy to perform

  • Large number of available probes

  • Able to monitor two or more probes simultaneously

  • Low resolution

  • Low depth penetration

  • Limited clinical translation

Bioluminescence
  • High sensitivity

  • Low background signal

  • High-throughput

  • Easy to perform

  • Multispectral imaging

  • Low resolution

  • Need for genetic modification

  • Limited clinical translation

PET
  • High sensitivity

  • Unlimited depth penetration

  • Clinical translation

  • Cost

  • Limited spatial resolution

  • Unable to monitor two or more probes simultaneously

SPECT
  • Unlimited depth penetration

  • Clinical translation

  • Able to monitor two or more probes simultaneously

  • Cost

  • Limited spatial resolution

  • Limited sensitivity

MRI
  • High spatial resolution

  • Clinical translation

  • Cost

  • Low sensitivity

  • Imaging time

Bioluminescence imaging utilizes cells that have been genetically engineered to convert chemical fuel into light. This modality does not require an external light excitation source, thus sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratios are typically greater than fluorescence imaging (23). For in vivo studies of living animals, a major weakness with optical methods is the poor penetration of visible light through skin and tissue. This technical problem is mitigated by employing imaging probes or cells that emit deep-red or near-infrared light, but the light is scattered as it passes through the sample and the resolution of whole-body, live animal optical images is typically quite poor (24). In comparison, radionuclear imaging methods such as Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) provide much deeper tissue penetration and greatly reduced scattering of the emitted signal, and thus, are more attractive for many types of clinical applications (25). However, the high cost, low throughput, and safety concerns associated with radionuclear imaging can be serious drawbacks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not employ ionizing radiation and can produce high resolution images of deep-tissue sites, but the technique is relatively insensitive (26). Overall, optical imaging is often used for preclinical research studies employing cells or small animal models, whereas radionuclear and MRI are more suitable for most types of clinical imaging.

Apoptosis Biomarkers

Intracellular Apoptosis Biomarkers

Caspases

Caspases are a family of intracellular cysteine proteases that play an important role in the initiation and execution of apoptosis (27). Caspases are typically divided into initiators (caspase-8, -9, and -10) that start the apoptotic cascade and effectors (caspase-3, -6, and -7, also known as executioner caspases), which are activated by the initiators. Furthermore, initiators are divided into caspases that participate in either the extrinsic (caspase-8 and -10) or intrinsic (caspase-9) apoptotic pathway (28). Within the cell, caspases exist as zymogens that are converted by a pro-apoptotic signal into an active form. Initiator caspases are activated by homodimerization, whereas effector caspases are activated by cleavage of a catalytic domain.

Caspases selectively cleave protein or peptide amide bonds that are on the carboxyl side of aspartic acid residues. The catalytic mechanisms are similar to other cysteine proteases, and studies are ongoing to fully understand the molecular processes producing the enzyme activation, bond cleavage, and enzyme inhibition (29). There are no clear cut rules that predict the optimal substrate sequence selectivity for a specific caspase, but typically, initiator caspases recognize and cleave WEHD sequences while effector caspases recognize the DEVD motif (28). The specificity of effector caspases for the DEVD sequence has been exploited by researchers to produce activatable molecular probes for optical imaging of apoptosis. The simplest molecular design incorporates a fluorescent donor/acceptor energy transfer pair that is separated by a cleavable peptide sequence (30). Cleavage of the peptide disconnects the energy transfer and switches on the fluorescence emission signal only at spatial locations with high caspase levels. This imaging strategy has proven quite useful for high-throughput screening of drug candidates in cell systems (31) and microscopic visualization of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in disseminated tumors (32). Deployment of the method for in vivo imaging of apoptosis requires caspase activatable probes with two additional attributes, (a) ability to emit near-infrared light, and (b) ability to penetrate the cell cytosol within the time frame for caspase activation (33). Both requirements were addressed in a study by Bullock et al. who synthesized a cell permeable activatable caspase substrate consisting of an all D-amino acid cell permeation peptide, RKKRRORRRG, conjugated to the N-terminus DEVDAPC caspase sequence. The recognition sequence was then flanked by a deep-red fluorophore and a spectral quencher to produce TcapQ647. The probe fluorescence was specifically activated by effector caspases and not initiator caspases, and was effective in cell culture and also amoeba-induced tumor cell death (34). This probe was also used to image single-retinal ganglion cell apoptosis in an in vivo rat model of glaucoma (35). The same research group produced a second generation cell-penetrating caspase-activatable probe that contained a lysine-arginine-rich (KKKRKV) cell-penetrating peptide sequence and an L-amino acid cleavable domain (36). This probe had essentially the same specificity and diagnostic properties as the first generation, TcapQ, but it was more biocompatible.

Polymer and nanoparticles are promising alternative scaffolds for enzyme activated imaging probes because they can present multiple fluorescent reporter groups and thus produce large changes in optical signal. The fluorophores are strongly self-quenched when they are attached to the scaffold and a strong signal enhancement is produced when they are released by caspase cleavage. Strategies utilizing gold nanoparticle systems (3739) and self-assembly nanostructures (40) have enabled direct observation of effector caspase activation and apoptosis in living cells. While all of these systems focus on measuring effector caspase activity, Huang and coworkers developed a nanoquencher system that could monitor the activities of different caspases simultaneously (41). The nanoquencher was generated by incorporating different dark quenchers into a mesoporous silica nanoparticle, and then conjugating the nanoparticle with a set of fluorescent peptide substrates that were responsive to different caspases. Thus, the fluorescence is turned on at wavelengths that are specific to the caspase that is activated. Using multiplexed fluorescence microscopy, the nanoquencher enabled simultaneous visualization of caspase-8, caspase-9, and caspase-3 activation after TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HCT116 cells. Moreover, the system returned to a relatively “dark” state upon addition of caspase-8, caspase-9, and caspase-3 inhibitors, highlighting the high enzyme specificity.

Bioluminescence imaging can be achieved using the luciferase enzyme to promote an oxidation reaction, which in turn produces light that can be captured by a sensitive camera. The most common strategy for designing bioluminescent apoptosis constructs is to restore luciferase activity through structural changes upon caspase activation (42), (a less common, alternative approach is to utilize BRET, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (43)). Kanno et al. achieved luciferase activity restoration by designing a genetically encoded cyclic construct containing two fragments of a DnaE intein fused to the neighboring ends of FLuc connected by a DEVD sequence. Once translated, the cyclic peptide distorts the structure of the luciferase causing it to lose bioluminescence activity (44). Cleavage by a caspase-3 enzyme converts the luciferase back to its active form and restores its activity. The cyclic luciferase was able to provide quantitative measurements of caspase-3 activity in response to external stimuli both in vitro and in a living rodent. Ray et al. developed a fusion protein, which encoded three different reporter proteins (producing bioluminescent, red fluorescent, and PET signals) linked by a DEVD peptide that can be specifically cleaved by active caspase-3. When tumor xenografts expressing this vector were treated with staurosporine, both the luciferase activity and the thymidine kinase PET activity increased by two-fold compared to controls (45). In a similar fashion, Niers et al. developed an apoptosis biosensor by using a caspase-3 cleavable sequence to link a green fluorescent protein to a Gaussia luciferase. The reporter was capable of monitoring apoptosis in real-time assays of whole blood (46). A different approach was taken by Coppola et al. who adapted a split-firefly reporter to construct a fusion of N- and C-termini of luciferase connected by a caspase-3 cleavage site (47). During apoptosis, caspase-3 cleaves the dark construct, which allows the two peptides to interact and restore luciferase activity through protein complementation. Treatment studies with tumor bearing mice showed the utility of this reporter to report on the efficacy of combination and experimental therapies through dynamic, non-invasive imaging. In an alternate strategy, Promega Inc. developed a modified FLuc luciferase substrate, Z-DEVD-aminoluciferin, that acts as a luciferase substrate only when caspase-3 is activated and cleaves the DEVD sequence. Hickson et al. employed this technology to detect caspase-3 activation in response to chemotherapy in two preclinical oncology models without toxicity to the animals (48). While bioluminescence imaging of caspase responsive reporters has attractive features for preclinical research, a central limitation for clinical translation is the need to genetically modify the cells of interest and introduce them into a living animal.

A promising approach to nuclear imaging of caspase activity employs selective and high affinity caspase inhibitors. Isatins are small molecule covalent inhibitors of activated caspase-3 and caspase-7 and thus attractive probe molecules for apoptosis imaging (49). Nguyen et al. synthesized a radiolabeled isatin 5-sulfonamide ([18F]ICMT-11) that was previously identified to have sub-nanomolar affinity for caspase-3 (50, 51). The study showed that increased cellular uptake of [18F]ICMT-11 in vitro and in drug-treated tumors was associated with an increase in caspase-3/7 activity. The study also suggested that [18F]ICMT-11 PET imaging may be useful for monitoring response to therapy in nonabdominal malignancies since there was high retention in the liver and intestines. [18F]ICMT-11 has recently been selected by the QuIC-ConCePT consortium for evaluation in humans as a candidate cell death imaging probe (52). Other researchers have reported new synthetic procedures to produce radiolabeled isatin analogues and identified promising probe structures that accumulate in mouse models of liver cell death (53, 54). Another class of caspase inhibitors are peptide acyloxymethyl ketones, which work by alkylating the enzyme active site cysteine residue (55). Edgington et al. developed fluorescently labeled acyloxymethyl ketone probes that bound irreversibly to the active site of caspase-3/7 and allowed non-invasive in vivo imaging of apoptosis kinetics in multiple mouse models (56).

While caspases are well known as apoptosis biomarkers, it is important to realize that the biological functions of caspases can extend beyond apoptosis and include other cellular remodeling events. Caspase activation is required for erythropoiesis and the differentiation of keratinocytes, lens epithelial cells, and neurons (57, 58). Moreover, caspase-3 can regulate B-cell proliferation and recently has been implicated in stem cell maintenance and differentiation (59). The DEVD peptide sequence can also be cleaved by other cysteine proteases such as cathepsins and legumain (60). As a precaution, researchers should complement caspase imaging with other biochemical techniques to ensure that they are monitoring caspase activity related to apoptosis.

Mitochondrial Membrane Potential

Mitochondria play a key role in the apoptotic cascade and a loss of membrane potential across the inner mitochondrial membrane (Δψm) accompanies the induction of cell death (61). Lipophilic phosphonium cations are known to penetrate healthy cells and accumulate at mitochondrial membranes that have a strongly negative transmembrane potential (62). During apoptosis, the electrochemical proton gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane collapses causing a reduction in phosphonium cation tracer levels (63). The 18F-fluorobenzyl triphenylphosphonium cation (18F-FBnTP) has been investigated as a PET imaging probe to detect alterations in mitochondrial membrane potential in vitro and in vivo. 18F-FBnTP was used to measure the pharmacodynamics of paclitaxel treatment in breast cancer cells, and the decrease in 18F-FBnTP uptake coincided with other apoptotic biomarkers such as Bax expression and cytochrome c release (64). A preclinical orthotopic prostate tumor treatment study showed significantly lower uptake of 18F-FBnTP into a treated tumor compared to 18F-FDG, a standard glucose-based probe that is used to measure the metabolic index of tumors (64). These studies required excision of tissues and ex vivo audioradioagraphy in order to obtain 18F-FBnTP quantification. Future studies will need to employ non-invasive, whole-body PET imaging to determine if 18F-FBnTP can accurately measure the kinetics and extent of apoptosis in a living animal. Biodistribution studies in healthy animals showed high 18F-FBnTP uptake in the kidneys, heart, and liver suggesting that these organs would provide a high starting signal for detection of apoptotic-related decreases (65). Nonetheless, imaging methods that are based on signal decreases are technically less attractive than methods that are based on signal increases.

Other Intracellular Apoptosis Biomarkers

Although effector caspases are the most studied intracellular cell death biomarker, there is ongoing effort to identify other intracellular proteins as targets for cell death imaging (66). The La antigen is an abundant protein that acts as a molecular chaperone for RNA polymerase III. La is believed to play an important role in the coupling of transcription and translation by acting as a shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm (67). La is overexpressed in human malignant cells compared to normal cells and a La-specific monoclonal antibody (3B9) is able to identify this difference in expression levels (68). In vitro and in vivo studies showed that the accumulation of 3B9 in the cytoplasm of dead cancer cells correlates with increasing DNA damage (69). For this method to work successfully, the following biochemical steps have to occur; 1) overexpression of La in malignant cells, 2) cleavage and redistribution of the La antigen to the cytoplasm after DNA-damaging treatment, (3) antibody permeation through the disrupted membranes of dead/dying cells, and (4) “fixation” of the La antigen and 3B9 by transglutaminase 2-mediated protein cross-linking, which occurs during cell death (68). Subsequent studies of a radiolabeled La-specific monoclonal antibody, APOMAB® DAB4 clone, showed an ability to detect chemotherapy induced tumor apoptosis (70). In a conceptually related manner, the 90 kDa heat shock protein (Hsp90) has also been targeted by a radiolabeled trivalent arsenical peptide, 4-(N-(S-glutathionylacetyl) amino)phenylarsonous acid (GSAO) for non-invasive identification of tumor cell death (71). Hsp90 contains a pair of highly conserved cysteines (Cys719 and Cys720) that can be selectively cross-linked by the GSAO probe. The high abundance of Hsp90 makes it an attractive target for sensitive molecular imaging; however, it appears that the cell membrane must be partially compromised for GSAO entry. It is not precisely known when, and by how much, plasma membrane permeability changes as a cell progresses from early to late stage apoptosis. The plasma membrane of an apoptotic cell has high integrity and is permeable to only a select group of small molecules, including nucleotides and cyanine dyes (due in part to caspase-mediated activation of the membrane channel protein, pannexin 1) (72). In contrast, the plasma membrane of a necrotic cell is completely disrupted with free access of small and large molecules to the cell interior.

Extracellular Apoptosis Biomarkers

Plasma Membrane Phospholipids

The plasma membrane of healthy mammalian cells has an asymmetric distribution of phospholipids. The membrane outer leaflet is comprised primarily of the zwitterionic phospholipids, phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin, and the exterior membrane surface is close to charge-neutral. Sequestered within the plasma membrane inner leaflet are phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) (20–40% of total phospholipid) and the major anionic phospholipid, phosphatidylserine (PS) (2–10% of total phospholipid). Loss of this asymmetric distribution during cell death, cell activation, or cell transformation, leads to PS and PE exposure and the cell surface becoming anionic. The appearance of PS and PE on the cell surface appears to be a universal indicator of most types of cell death processes and thus high abundance biomarkers for cell death imaging (73).

There has been extensive effort to develop targeted imaging probes for exposed PS using appropriately labeled PS-binding proteins (19). The most studied PS-binding protein is annexin V, a 36 kDa single chain protein that binds to PS in a Ca2+-dependent manner. Annexin V derivatives have been developed for SPECT (74), PET (75), MRI (76), ultrasound (77), and fluorescence (78) imaging, and several have reached early-stage clinical trials (79). Although many studies have produced promising results, there appears to be lingering technical questions about non-ideal pharmacokinetics and probe production (8083). It is known that covalent attachment of different labels (e.g., fluorescent dyes, chelators for radionuclides) can significantly change the protein’s binding properties and pharmacokinetics. The most studied conjugate of annexin V is 99mTc-hydrazinonicotinamide-annexin V (99mTc- HYNIC-annexin V), which has been tested for preclinical and clinical SPECT imaging of tumor response to treatment and other models of cell death (84, 85). The simplest way to attach the HYNIC group is to treat annexin V with N-succinimidyl HYNIC. This method has a drawback in that the native annexin V has 21 lysine residues available for conjugation; thus, there is a statistical distribution of labels. To circumvent this problem, site directed mutagenesis has been used to produce mutant proteins that can be cleanly labeled with controlled stoichiometry. One approach incorporates a reactive cysteine residue for labeling by thiol conjugation chemistry (86). Introduction of the cysteine residue did not alter the apoptotic cell binding properties, and the mutant annexin probe showed a high level of kidney retention with lower accumulation in the spleen and liver (87). Histidine-tagged annexin V variants have also been developed, and both pharmacokinetics and in vivo detection of cell death appear to be very similar to that of 99mTc-HYNIC-annexin V (88). Another bioconjugation method attached ethylenedicysteine to annexin V which enabled 99mTc chelation. Clinical imaging of ten patients with breast cancer showed higher target to non-target ratios in drug treated tumors compared to non-treated tumors (Figure 5) (89). The conjugation methods for developing SPECT versions of annexin V have nearly been exhausted, thus future research to improve pharmacokinetics and clinical utility will likely evolve towards PET versions of annexin V or new targeting strategies (79). Indeed, specific conjugation methods have been developed to produce 68Ga, 11C, and 18F labeled versions of annexin V for PET imaging (9092). Annexin V conjugated with 18F enabled visualization and monitoring of tumor cell death dynamics due to doxorubicin treatment (93). Furthermore, 18F-annexin V showed high uptake in the spleen and bone marrow of doxorubicin-treated mice, which reflected drug induced toxicity to these cells.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Clinical imaging with cell death molecular probes. (A) Scintigraphic images of separate non-treated and drug treated breast cancer patients who were injected with 99mTc-EC-Annexin V. Annexin V had higher accumulation in treated breast tumors compared to non-treated tumors, though the probe localized to both tumors as indicated by the cross-lines. (B) 18F-ML-10 PET images of a brain metastasis in a single patient (indicated by arrow) before and after whole brain radiation therapy. The low level of 18F-ML-10 accumulation in the metastasis prior to treatment likely represents a basal amount of cell death. Reprinted with permission from references 89 and 147.

Recent work to improve annexin V image contrast includes the development of a pretargeting strategy using biotinylated annexin V and radiolabeled streptavidin (94). The stepwise dosing process starts with an intravenous injection of biotinylated annexin V, which targets dead and dying cells. A subsequent injection of a limited amount of avidin protein rapidly associates with any free annexin V in the blood pool and clears it from the circulation. A third injection of radiolabeled streptavidin leads to visualization of the remaining biotinylated annexin V at the cell death target site. Annexin V is known to slowly penetrate into cells, thus the timing between injection of biotinylated annexin V and radiolabeled streptavidin needs be optimized to ensure that enough annexin V remains on the cell surface to generate a useful target signal (95, 96). Ungethum et al. utilized bioinformatics and protein-protein docking methods to create a structure/function relationship for annexin V internalization.97 This information led to the production of an annexin V variant that remained on the cell surface of apoptotic cells, and performed better as a cell death pretargeting agent than wild type annexin V.

Other PS-binding proteins have been labeled with reporter groups to produce promising cell death imaging agents. Synaptotagmin-I is a synaptic vesicle associated membrane protein that contains a C2A and C2B domain, the former of which is responsible for Ca2+-dependent binding to PS. Typically, the C2A domain is expressed and used as a recombinant glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fusion protein. Radiolabeling C2A-GST with 99mTc or 18F produces imaging probes for visualizing cell death in animal models of myocardial infarction and anti-cancer treatment (98100). These radiolabeling procedures are typically performed through amine chemistry on the ε-amino group of surface lysine residues. There are 14 lysine residues in C2A and 35 in C2A-GST, thus the labeled probes are expected to be a heterogeneous mixture of molecular species with different binding affinities. C2A variants containing His tags and/or a free cysteine have been developed for efficient and site-specific radiolabeling (101). Alam and coworkers developed a site-directed mutant of C2A, C2Am, in which a serine residue that is distant from the PS-binding site was replaced with a single cysteine residue (S78C) (102). Flow cytometry showed that the fluorescently labeled C2Am had a 4-fold higher specific binding to cell death than a commercially available fluorescent annexin V, although annexin V labeled more apoptotic and necrotic cells. This lower binding of C2Am to viable cells should lead to lower non-specific accumulation and higher target to background ratios at sites of cell death.

Lactadherin or MFG-E8, a glycoprotein secreted by macrophages, has a discoidin-type C2 domain that is responsible for stereospecific binding to PS in a Ca2+-independent manner. Yeung et al. generated a genetically encoded biosensor for PS by fusing a green fluorescent protein to the C2 domain of lactadherin (103). In RAW264.7 cells, GFP-Lact-C2 bound to the cytosolic leaflet of the plasma membrane, endosomes, and lysosomes, and this binding was dependent on PS and not simply anionic charge. Lactadherin was capable of detecting progressively higher levels of exposed PS on the surface of stored platelets and proved to be effective at visualizing PS-associated morphological changes in platelets (104). The increased sensitivity for exposed PS has prompted efforts to develop SPECT versions of lactadherin for cell death radioimaging. A 99mTc-HYNIC-lactadherin conjugate was found to have the same biological properties of lactadherin, and biodistribution studies showed rapid clearance from the blood and accumulation in the liver (105). Additional in vivo testing of this imaging probe seems warranted.

Because of their relatively large molecular sizes, proteins and antibodies have the intrinsic benefit of high binding affinity and high target selectivity, but imaging performance can be limited by stability problems, undesired organ distribution profiles, slow diffusion rates, and slow blood-pool clearance rates. The latter concern is especially problematic for imaging techniques with radioactive probes that have short half-lives and must be cleared rapidly so high contrast imaging can be achieved before the signal is lost. Compared to proteins, it is much easier to systematically fine-tune the pharmacokinetic properties of small molecules, and it is highly advantageous to develop small molecule imaging probes that exhibit the same targeting capabilities as proteins. With these thoughts in mind, investigators have searched for low molecular weight molecules that exhibit high and selective PS-binding affinity. Several research groups have independently employed phage panning technology to find different small peptides (hexamers to decamers) that bind exposed PS with nanomolar dissociation constants. Burtea and coworkers screened an M13 phage display library on PS-coated plates and identified a hexapeptide (LIKKPF) with high PS binding affinity but only modest phosphatidylserine/phosphatidylcholine selectivity (106). Labeling the peptide with a Gd-diethylene triamine pentacetic acid (DTPA) complex produced a targeted MRI contrast agent that was able to visualize cell death in atherosclerotic plaques and in a liver apoptosis mouse model. In an effort to increase probe sensitivity and alleviate possible in vivo toxicities related to gadolinium conjugates, the same group attached another PS-binding hexapeptide (TLVSSL) to ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIO) (107, 108). In vivo MRI showed the peptide USPIO particles were able to detect increased apoptosis in tumors subjected to radiation and different chemotherapeutic regimens and in an animal model of atherosclerosis (109, 110). A second research group independently identified CLSYYPSY as a novel PS-interacting octapeptide (111). A fluorescein labeled version of this peptide specifically homed to the tumor vasculature and apoptotic tumor cells in xenografts treated with camptothecin. Interestingly, the researchers found that a cyclized form of the peptide exhibited more specific binding to apoptotic cells than the linear form. A third group identified a phage projecting 12-mer peptide (SVSVGMKPSPRP) that selectively bound to PS exposed on red blood cells and apoptotic cells (112). Most recently, Xiong and colleagues used rational design to identify a PS-binding14-mer peptide that was derived from the PS-binding site within a PS decarboxylase enzyme (113). Modification of the peptide with a 99mTc chelating group enhanced PS binding affinity to give a nanomolar dissociation constant, while enabling ex vivo radioimaging of tumor cell death produced by paclitaxel treatment. Significant accumulation of the peptide probe in the liver and kidney likely prevented effective in vivo whole-body SPECT imaging of cell death. Using an alternative, rational design approach, Zheng and coworkers developed a new class of cyclic peptides that mimic the PS-binding domain of lactadherin (114). These cyclic peptides have micromolar association constants for membrane with exposed PS, and produce selective staining of apoptotic cells in culture.

The group of Smith and coworkers have pursued synthetic zinc dipicolylamine (ZnDPA) coordination complexes as an alternative approach to PS-targeting. The membrane association process utilizes a three-component assembly process where Zn2+ ions mediate cooperative association of the dipicolylamine ligand and the anionic head group of membrane-bound PS. Functionally, this is similar to the way that Ca2+ ions act as cofactors for membrane association of annexin V. Initial work showed that a fluorescein labeled ZnDPA can distinguish dead and dying mammalian cells from healthy cells in cell culture (115). To enable in vivo imaging of cell death, a synthetic fluorescent near-infrared probe, PSS-794, was developed and shown to target the necrotic foci of tumors in living rodents (116). The versatility and effectiveness of PSS-794 as an in vivo cell death imaging probe was exemplified in animal models of tissue damage, thymus atrophy, anti-tumor treatment, and traumatic brain injury (117121). Wyffels et al. developed a 99mTc-HYNIC-ZnDPA probe and a related 99mTc(CO)3-ZnDPA probe and characterized their potential as SPECT cell death imaging agents using anti-Fas liver apoptosis and myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury mouse models (122). Both models showed that the probes targeted cell death; however, selective uptake was low while significant accumulation occurred in the liver and GI tract. Surman et al. developed a ZnDPA lanthanide complex for visualizing anionic membranes through MRI (123). Gd- ZnDPA selectively targeted apoptotic cells in culture as measured by both MR relaxation rate and signal intensity, and both parameters were dependent on probe concentration. An earlier approach conjugated ZnDPA containing peptides to a magnetofluorescent nanoparticle for detection of apoptotic cells in culture (124). Expanding on this molecular design strategy, Oltmanns and co-workers have developed a 18F conjugated Zn-cyclen probe for PET imaging of treated tumors in rodent model (125). Both radiation and taxol treated tumors had higher levels of Zn-cyclen probe than their non-treated controls; however, most of the probe accumulated in the liver and other organs. Optimization of the pharmacokinetics needs to be resolved before ZnDPA and Zn-cyclen probes can be considered for clinical trials.

In addition to targeting surface exposed PS, it appears that probes targeting surface exposed PE are also effective cell death imaging agents. Duramycin, a 19-amino acid, disulfide cross-linked peptide that binds to membrane bound PE with high affinity and high selectivity, has been the most studied peptide for PE imaging (126). Covalent modification of duramycin with HYNIC and 99mTc enabled SPECT imaging of acute cardiac cell death as early as 10 min after probe injection, while providing a favorable pharmacokinetic profile (127). In irradiated cells, PE is simultaneously exposed with PS on the cell membrane surface, and this pattern of exposure and colocalization is maintained over time (128). Furthermore, Stafford and Thorpe used biotin and near-infrared fluorescent versions of duramycin to detect exposed PE on the surface of tumor endothelium (129). Recently a member of the CD300 family of receptors, CD300a, was shown to specifically bind to PE and PS exposed on dead and dying cells (130). Further studies should look at the utility of a labeled CD300a protein for imaging cell death and/or the tumor endothelium.

Targeting plasma membrane phospholipids has proven to be a successful strategy for imaging cell death; yet, the imaging information that is gained by targeting these biomarkers is somewhat limited. Probes targeting PS and/or PE cannot usually distinguish apoptosis from necrosis since the phospholipids are exposed during both cell death processes. Furthermore, non-apoptotic cells such as activated lymphocytes, tumor endothelial cells, tumor cells, and microvesicles are known to display PS on their cellular surfaces (131134).

Cell Surface Exposed Histones

Apoptotic cells are known to be a source of DNA fragments, nucleoprotein complexes, and histones that drive the production of autoantibodies in certain autoimmunity conditions such as lupus. Histones, are normally organized into nucleosomes (H2A, H2B, H3, H4) or located on the internucleosomal DNA (histone H1) in mammalian cells. During apoptosis, the histones are released from the cytoplasm and subsequently transported to the plasma membrane where they are accessible for recognition by professional phagocytes (135). The translocation of histone H1 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and cell surface occurs in the early stages of apoptosis and is mediated by caspases (136). With this process in mind, Wang et al. utilized phage display to identify CQRPPR hexapeptide (Apopep-1), which bound to histone H1 exposed on the surface of apoptotic cells (137). Fluorescently labeled Apopep-1 effectively targeted dead and dying cells within tumor tissue, and probe accumulation increased when tumors were treated with anti-cancer drugs. The Apopep-1 peptide was also shown to detect dying neurons in a preclinical mouse model of Parkinson’s disease (138).

Other Plasma Membrane Biomarkers

The family of small molecule probes produced by Aposense Inc. appear to be promising detectors of apoptosis in living animals. One of the initial compounds, N,N′-didansyl-L-cystine (DDC) was shown, using fluorescence microscopy, to accumulate in dead and dying cells in a rodent stroke model (139). Autoradiography using 3H-DDC corroborated the fluorescence results by showing accumulation in the ischemic regions of the brain. Ex vivo fluorescence microscopy of histological samples showed DDC staining of damaged tissue from traumatic brain injury and chemotherapy-induced enteropathy (140, 141). The DDC is proposed to selectively accumulate inside apoptotic cells due to plasma membrane depolarization and activation of scramblase proteins on the cell membrane. A technical drawback with this fluorescent probe is the short wavelength, dansyl fluorophore, which is not highly suitable for cell microscopy or animal imaging. Another dansyl derivative, DFNSH, has also been shown to accumulate in the cytoplasm of dead and dying cancer cells (142). Radiolabeling of this dansylhydrazone with 18F enabled visualization of ketamine-induced neurotoxicity in rat brains via PET imaging (143). Aposense Inc. has developed ML-10 as another low molecular weight detector of cell death based on the alkyl-malonate group from γ-carboxyglutamic acid. ML-10 showed intracellular uptake in apoptotic cells and did not accumulate in cells where the membrane had been disrupted, thus the probe could be used to identify cells in early stage apoptosis (144). The mechanism of ML-10 uptake is hypothesized to be the result of membrane depolarization and acidification during early apoptosis. To facilitate PET imaging of apoptosis, ML-10 was radiolabeled with 18F (145). In a experimental cerebral stroke mouse model, 18F-ML-10 had a 2-fold-higher uptake in the affected cerebral hemisphere and a 6 to 10-fold higher uptake in the region of the infarct, which was validated by histological evidence of cell death. These results prompted a clinical study evaluating the dosimetry, biodistribution, stability, and safety profile of 18F-ML-10 in healthy humans (146). Administration of 18F-ML-10 appeared to be safe and the probe exhibited high in vivo stability. Most recently, 18F-ML-10 was shown to enable early assessment of brain metastases response in a cohort of 10 oncology patients given whole-body radiation therapy (Figure 5) (147). Overall, 18F-ML-10 appears to be a very promising cell death imaging probe for clinical use in humans. However, it is worth noting that a radioiodinated version of ML-10 was not useful for apoptosis imaging (148). This suggests that the cell targeting mechanism for this probe family needs to be fully elucidated so that the probe structure can be rationally modified for specific apoptosis imaging applications.

Necrosis Biomarkers

Necrosis is often classified as an uncontrolled, accidental process that occurs as the result of physical or chemical insult. However, under certain circumstances a programmed form of necrosis can occur, termed necroptosis. Furthermore, in the absence of efficient cell removal by the immune system, late stage apoptotic cells will subsequently undergo secondary necrosis. Primary and secondary necrosis differ in the time taken for rupture of the plasma membrane and release of intracellular molecules into the extracellular environment. The released molecules, along with changes in intracellular metabolism, can be targeted as biomarkers for necrosis imaging (149). However, it must be remembered that many biomarkers, like PS exposure, are common to both apoptosis and necrosis and additional imaging data is needed to distinguish them.

A common biomarker for necrosis is the intracellular DNA that becomes accessible after disruption of the cell plasma membrane. Propidium iodide, a fluorescent DNA binding dye, is routinely used in flow cytometry as a secondary marker for necrosis. There appears to be no published studies using this dye for whole-body in vivo necrosis imaging; however, labs have used other DNA binding molecules to target necrosis in living animals. Dasari et al. developed a fluorescent necrosis probe by conjugating a near-infrared IR-786 dye to Hoechst, a biocompatible DNA binding agent (150). The Hoechst-IR probe was shown to distinguish viable cells from dead and dying cells with permeable membranes. When evaluated in necrosis-inducing myocardial infarction and sepsis in vivo models, Hoechst-IR allowed whole-body fluorescence imaging of necrotic tissue. Garanger et al. synthesized a multimodal DNA-binding agent by appending a gadolinium chelating DTPA to TO-PRO-1, which binds to DNA though electrostatic interactions with the phosphate backbone (151). The Gd-TO probe did not accumulate in viable cells, but showed increased T1 relaxivity and fluorescence intensity in camptothecin treated cells. The utility of Gd-TO for in vivo necrosis imaging was tested in a permanent myocardial infarction mouse model (152). Gd-TO allowed visualization of acute necrosis as well as the progression and clearance of necrotic cells from the ischemic myocardium. It is likely that other necrosis imaging probes can be produced using this general strategy of conjugating an imaging contrast agent to a DNA binding molecule, although it is possible that they may suffer from toxicity problems (153).

A number of other molecular probes with high avidity for necrotic tissue have been used for non-invasive imaging of ischemic myocardial injury, brain infarct, and assessment of radiofrequency ablation therapies. The most studied of these compounds is hypericin, which is a non-porphyrin photosynthesizer derived from the plant genus Hypericum. A radiolabeled derivative of hypericin, mono123I-iodohypericin, allowed visualization of necrotic liver tissue after systematic injection (154). A less lipophilic version of mono123I-iodohypericin, containing a carboxylic acid, was reported to exhibit faster blood clearance and be better suited for whole-body imaging of necrosis (155). Pretargeting strategies using biotinylated hypericin and 123I-avidin have been applied for necrotic tumor imaging; however, a problem was poor penetration of the 123I-avidin into necrotic tissue (156). The inherent fluorescence properties of hypercin have also been exploited for microscopic necrosis imaging (157, 158). Recently, a 64Cu-bis-DOTA-hypericin was used to assess anti-tumor therapeutic efficacy induced by photothermal ablation (159). SPECT and PET derivatives of pamoic acid have been used in vivo and ex vivo to delineate necrotic tissue from viable tissue (160, 161). The targeting mechanisms for these compounds and other necrosis probes are not well known, and may vary with molecular structure (162, 163).

Much attention has been focused on developing biomarkers for necroptosis imaging since it has an important role in numerous biological and pathophysiological settings (164). Necroptosis can be initiated by the same signaling ligands as apoptosis; though its morphological features are characteristic of pathological necrosis and it is highly dependent on the activation of receptor-interacting protein-1 (RIP-1) and/or receptor-interacting protein-3 (RIP-3) (165, 166). Downstream events of RIP-1 and RIP-3 activation include cytosolic ATP depletion, ROS overproduction, activation of calpains and cathepsins, and lysosomal membrane permeabilization (164). Currently, only a few of these biomarkers have been investigated as molecular imaging targets. For example, Vanden Berghe et al. utilized a commercially available ROS indicator (CM-H2DCFDA), a mitochondrial transmembrane potential probe (TMRM), and a lysosome imaging agent (LysoTracker Red DND-99) to investigate the occurrence of necrosis signaling events via live-cell fluorescence imaging (167). It is worth noting that cathepsin B is one of the enzymes that is released and activated during lysosomal membrane permeabilization, and that cathepsin B activatable fluorescent probes, Cat B 680 FAST and Cat B 750 FAST are commercially available from Perkin Elmer. These probes have been validated for whole-body imaging in animal models of cancer (168) and inflammatory-related diseases (169); however, they have not yet been evaluated in cell death animal models. Cathepsin B inhibitors, such as CA-074 methyl ester, may also be effective for visualizing cell death when labeled with a reporter group (170). An enzymatic inhibitor of RIP-1 kinase, necrostatin-1, has been discovered to protect against necroptotic cell death both in vitro and in vivo (171, 172). This suggests that necrostatin-1 and other necrostatins may be effective molecular scaffolds for the development of imaging agents that are specific for necroptosis. As stated previously, differentiating cell death pathways can be quite challenging and typically requires careful monitoring of the temporal changes in biomarkers (173).

Autophagy Biomarkers

Autophagy is a programmed biological process where cytoplasmic structures are degraded in lysosomes. At present, autophagy can be divided into three forms, macroautophagy, microautophagy, and chaperone-mediated autophagy, with macroautophagy as the most-extensively studied. Macroautophagy is mediated by special double-membrane vesicles called autophagosomes, which engulf cytoplasmic constituents and deliver them to lysosomes for degradation. Macromolecules generated from the lysosomal degradation are then delivered to the cytosol and reused for energetic or biosynthetic processes.

The initiation and regulation of autophagy relies on a set of Atg proteins that are required for the formation of the autophagosome. The Atg proteins are conserved among highly distant species including yeast and humans. The microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3), a mammalian homolog of yeast Atg8, is known to exist on autophagosomes, thus it has served as a molecular marker for autophagosomes and subsequently autophagy (174). Tagging LC3 with a green fluorescent protein has proven to be an effective technique for visualizing and quantifying punctate intracellular structures in living cells and in different model organisms including mice and Drosophila. Imaging in larger organisms requires excision of target tissues followed by fixation for fluorescence microscopy. While this technique is useful for evaluating the number of autophagosomes, it may not always be an indicator of autophagic activity. The accumulation of LC3-positive autophagosomes may be the result of increased initiation of autophagy or decreased autophagic degradation, caused by defects in lysosomal fusion or degradation (173). Studies using static imaging techniques should always include autophagic flux measurements that can discriminate between efficient and arrested autophagy. The various methods to assess autophagy have been discussed in recent review articles (174, 175).

A point of current debate is whether cell death is mediated by autophagy (autophagic cell death) or occurs along with autophagy. In most cases, autophagy plays a cytoprotective role in response to cellular stress. However, there are reports of systems where autophagy appears to be responsible for cell death (176, 177). Factors that make it difficult to asses the contribution of autophagy to cell death, include: (a) misdiagnosis of autophagy, (b) increased number of autophagosomes might represent increased initiation or decreased autophagy, (c) lack of specific inhibitors for autophagy, (d) autophagy inhibition may result in changes in morphology or rate of dead cell degradation, and (e) quantitative discrepancy between the magnitude of autophagy inhibition and cell death inhibition (178). The molecular connections between autophagy and cell death are complex and poorly understood; thus researchers have proposed criteria that must be met in order to use the term “autophagic cell death.” These include: (a) prevention of cell death by inhibition of the autophagic pathway by chemical and/or genetic means, and (b) increase in autophagic flux and not just an increase in autophagy markers (179). Studies involving the inhibition or deletion of multiple Atg genes could delineate whether autophagy is mediating cell death in a specific biological context. Understanding the interplay between autophagy and cell death processes could facilitate the development of drugs that manipulate autophagy in cancer and other diseases.

Unexplored Cell Death Biomarkers

While a wide variety of molecular imaging agents show avidity for dead and dying cells and tissue, there are additional biomarkers that could be exploited as whole-body cell death imaging probes. One example is High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1), which is a non-histone nuclear protein that is passively released into the extracellular environment during primary and secondary necrosis (180). When released, HMGB1 acts as a signaling molecule that can interact with a number of pattern recognition receptors, producing a pro-inflammatory environment (181). HMGB1 levels are elevated in both mouse models and clinical patient samples, and therapeutic intervention with HMGB1 specific antibodies has been shown to rescue mice from lethal sepsis (182). Additionally, an anti-HMGB1 monoclonal antibody effectively reduced blood-brain-barrier disruption and inhibited brain edema during ischemic insult (183). Antibodies are commonly used for whole-body imaging for cancer and other disease states, thus it may be feasible to develop a suitably labeled anti-HMGB1 antibody for necrosis imaging.

The surface exposure of calreticulin (ecto-CRT) has been found to be an important signal for the induction of an immunogenic cell death response. Calreticulin is a Ca2+-binding protein that is largely found in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum and has been implicated in many diverse functions from regulation of calcium metabolism to cellular adhesion (184). Upon treatment with anthracyclines or ionizing radiation, cancer cells undergo immunogenic apoptosis where calreticulin is transported to the surface of the cell from the lumen of the ER (185). The ecto-CRT precedes the exposure of PS and other morphological features of apoptosis and associates with PS at later stages of apoptosis (186, 187). Recently, Jung and co-workers used a fluorescently labeled anti-CRT mAb to non-invasively monitor immunogenic cell death during anti-tumor treatment (188). While these results are promising, careful consideration should be used when selecting CRT as a biomarker for cell death. Ecto-CRT can be found on a subset of cells that are not undergoing immunogenic apoptosis including erythrocytes and immune cells (186, 189). Moreover, not all chemotherapeutic agents induce calreticulin exposure on the surface cells (185).

Senescence represents a cellular stress response that leads to irreversible cell arrest, which can be induced to counteract disease initiation (190). A number of characteristics aid in the identification of senescence such as activation of key effector pathways, morphological changes, loss of proliferation, senescence-associated heterochromatic foci production and increased expression of cell cycle inhibitors (p16INK4A, p15INK4B, p21, and p53) (191, 192). The most widely used biomarker for identifying senescence is senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-βgal) activity, which is derived from lysosomal β-galactosidase. Both chromogenic and fluorogenic substrates have proven useful for detecting SA-βgal activity in cell culture, excised tissue, and histological sections; however, their in vivo utility remains unknown (193, 194). A number of β-galactosidase substrates have been developed and validated for reporting gene expression in vivo using optical (195, 196), radionuclear (197), and MR imaging modalities (198). Recently, a 18F-labeled antisense oligonucleotide was evaluated in vitro for its ability to measure alterations in p21 expression due to cellular irradiation (199). To our knowledge, these imaging substrates have not been evaluated in animal models of senescence. When conducting imaging studies to identify senescence, more than one biomarker should be targeted since a single marker cannot indisputably identify a senescent cell in vitro and in vivo (191). Moreover, the choice of biomarkers will likely depend on the disease state and the model system of interest.

Therapeutic Strategies Using Cell Death Biomarkers

In addition to molecular imaging, cell death biomarkers are potential targets for therapeutic treatments. PS on the cell surface of apoptotic cells acts as an “eat-me” signal for the mononuclear phagocyte system (200). Generally, macrophages will quickly ingest the apoptotic cells and release an anti-inflammatory response, which can promote tumor growth when apoptotic tumor cells are ingested. If the apoptotic cells are not efficiently cleared by the body then they can enter secondary necrosis. During secondary necrosis, the plasma membrane becomes irreversibly permeable causing the release of damage associated molecular patterns such as HMGB1, heat shock proteins, SAP130, etc (181). The release of damage associated molecular patterns allows dendritic cells to take-up antigens from dead cells, in addition to inducing a co-stimulatory effect towards these cells. These antigens can promote a specific immune response against apoptotic and necrotic cells. Thus, it is advantageous to shift the clearance of dead and dying cells from macrophages to dendritic cells when developing treatments against cancer and other diseases. Munoz et al. used annexin V to determine if blocking PS could make apoptotic cells immunogenic in vivo (201). They found that annexin V inhibited cell phagocytosis by monocyte-derived macrophages, thus causing a change in the immunogenicity of apoptotic and necrotic cells. When incubated with irradiated, apoptotic tumor cells, annexin V partially blocked the cell clearance from macrophages causing the tumor cells to undergo secondary necrosis and be taken up by dendritic cells (202). The presence of annexin V with irradiated tumor cells promoted a pro-inflammatory environment. Challenging lymphoma-tumor bearing mice with annexin V and irradiated tumor cells led to inhibition of tumor growth in 60% of mice, whereas irradiated tumor cells alone only stopped growth in 5% of mice. Interestingly, vaccination with annexin V alone caused a reduction in colorectal tumor growth suggesting that molecular targeting of PS in and around the tumor may induce tumor cell death. Indeed, antibodies that specifically bind to PS exposed on the stressed tumor endothelium have been shown to suppress tumor growth in multiple tumor types (203–305). In addition, mutants of MFG-E8, a bridging molecule that promotes phagocytosis by targeting PS on apoptotic cells and integrins on phagocytes, have been shown to have immunomodulatory properties (206). Taken together, molecular targeting of PS on stressed and apoptotic cells may be an effective strategy for initiating a pro-inflammatory milieu and suppressing tumor growth.

Histone H1 is an alternative molecular marker of apoptotic cells that can be targeted for drug delivery into tumors. During chemotherapy, tumor cells typically undergo apoptosis, which subsequently increases the levels of cell surface apoptosis biomarkers such as histone H1 and PS. Wang et al. demonstrated an interesting theranostic strategy by preparing doxorubicin-loaded liposomes that were labeled with the histone H1 targeting peptide, Apopep-1 (207). The strategy is summarized schematically in Figure 6. After dosing, the liposomes target the sites of endogenous cell death within a tumor, and if the tumor is responsive to the drug, more cell death occurs. Thus, with every additional treatment, the level of cell death biomarker in the tumor increases and enhances tumor drug delivery. Using a lung tumor xenograft mouse model, the researchers showed that histone-targeted liposomes (Apopep-1-DOX) inhibited tumor growth better than folate-targeted and untargeted liposomes. Histone-targeted liposomes that were loaded with a near-infrared dye instead of doxorubicin had higher accumulation in Apopep-1-DOX treated tumors than tumors treated with untargeted liposomes suggesting that these nanoparticles could be used to monitor treatment response. The most recent refinement of this histone-targeted strategy is a cancer immunotherapy study that labeled the surface of T cells with Apopep-1 and found enhanced homing of the cells to doxorubicin-treated tumor (208). This apoptosis-targeted drug and cell delivery strategy may be applicable to other cell death biomarkers, especially those exposed on the cell surface such as PS. Another possibility is to target the biomarkers that induce senescence (209, 210).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Theranostic strategy using a cell death-targeted drug delivery agent that also monitors treatment response. Adapted from reference 207.

Instead of inducing cell death, there is growing interest in the opposite chemotherapeutic effect of inhibiting cell death. This strategy should be useful for treating diseases associated with excessive cell death such as neurodegenerative diseases, sepsis, cardiovascular diseases, and ischemic injuries (211, 212). Inhibition of caspases during stroke, cardiovascular diseases, and liver failure has proven to be efficacious, and a few caspase inhibitors have entered clinical trials (213). Recently, Huang and coworkers showed that activated caspase-3 in dying tumor cells can stimulate cell proliferation through the release of soluble lipid messengers, suggesting that caspase inhibitors may also be useful in combination with other chemotherapeutics to prevent tumor recurrence (214). Researchers have also targeted other biomarkers in the apoptosis pathway. Becattini and coworkers designed a small molecule capable of inhibiting the proapoptotic protein, Bid (215). An alternative approach delivers the antiapoptotic peptides, Bcl-xL and BH4, into cells and decreases apoptosis in animal models of sepsis, total-body irradiation, and stroke (216218). Pharmacological modulation of non-apoptotic cell death pathways is another strategy for rescuing dead and dying tissues from pathological diseases. Necrostatin-1, a potent inhibitor of necroptosis, decreases injury and improves functional outcome in mouse models of traumatic brain injury, hypoxic-ischemic injury, and Huntington’s disease (219221). In principle, all of these cell death inhibition strategies could be improved by using in vivo drug delivery strategies that selectively deliver the chemotherapeutic agent to the appropriate anatomical sites undergoing cell death.

Clinical Imaging of Cell Death: Current Challenges and Likely Rewards

While there has been considerable progress over the last five years, in vivo cell death imaging remains one of the most important unsolved problems in clinical molecular imaging. To be successful in the clinic, many technical challenges must be overcome. First, imaging probes need to accurately detect the spatial and temporal occurrence of specific cell death processes. Diseased tissues such as cancerous tumors are highly heterogeneous and these different cell types can respond differently to treatment. Knowing which cells are undergoing cell death during treatment and where they are located within the tumor will help increase treatment efficacy. The time course for cell death will likely vary with the type of treatment and individual patient response. Currently, cancer therapeutics are assessed using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) which is based on measurements of tumor size and is susceptible to incorrect conclusions (222). The clinical standard of care can likely be improved by incorporating robust molecular imaging methods that evaluate tumor response (223, 224). In other disease areas, the pharmacological challenges for successful cell death imaging are different. For example, neurological disorders require imaging probes that can cross the blood brain barrier. Image contrast will be determined by multiple factors, including the rate of probe clearance from the bloodstream, the rate and location of the cell death process, and the rate of dead cell clearance by the innate immune response. Thus, successful development of an effective cell death imaging probe requires the global optimization of a set of interdependent probe properties (Figure 3). For continued progress towards clinical imaging, structurally well-defined probe candidates must be produced in a cost-effective manner and tested in validated cell death animal models that mimic the genotypic and phenotypic traits seen in humans. The development of clinical methods for simultaneous imaging of cell death and other related physiological processes (metabolism, proliferation, angiogenesis) (13, 14) will greatly help clinicians diagnose diseases and make better decisions about personalized treatment options.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for funding support from NIH grants R01GM059078 (B.D.S.) and T32GM075762 (B.A.S.).

References

  • 1.Vaux DL, Korsmeyer SJ. Cell Death in Development. Cell. 1999;96:245–254. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80564-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thompson CB. Apoptosis in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Disease. Science. 1995;267:1456–1462. doi: 10.1126/science.7878464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van Heerde WL, Robert-Offerman S, Dumont E, Hofstra L, Doevendans PA, Smits JFM, Daemen MJAP, Reutelingsperger C. Markers of Apoptosis in Cardiovascular Tissues: Focus on Annexin V. Cardiovasc Res. 2000;45:549–559. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(99)00396-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Okada H, Mak TW. Pathways of Apoptotic and Non-Apoptotic Death in Tumor Cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:592–603. doi: 10.1038/nrc1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brown JM, Attardi LD. The Role of Apoptosis in Cancer Development and Treatment Response. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:231–237. doi: 10.1038/nrc1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marx J. Autophagy: Is it Cancer’s Friend or Foe? Science. 2006;312:1160–1161. doi: 10.1126/science.312.5777.1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Blum ES, Abraham MC, Yoshimura S, Lu Y, Shaham S. Control of Nonapoptotic Developmental Cell Death in Carnorhabditis elegans by a Polyglutamine-Repeat Protein. Science. 2012;335:970–973. doi: 10.1126/science.1215156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, Patel DN, Bauer AJ, Cantley AM, Yang WS, Morrison B, III, Stockwell BR. Ferroptosis: An Iron-Dependent Form of Nonapoptotic Cell Death. Cell. 2012;149:1060–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Krysko O, de Ridder L, Cornelissen M. Phosphatidylserine Exposure During Early Primary Necrosis (Oncosis) in JB6 Cells as Evidenced by Immunogold Labeling Technique. Apoptosis. 2004;9:495–500. doi: 10.1023/B:APPT.0000031452.75162.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Festjens N, Vanden Berghe T, Vandenabeele P. Necrosis, a Well- Orchestrated Form of Cell Demise: Signaling Cascades, Important Mediators and Concomitant Immune Response. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1757:1371–1378. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Galluzzi L, Maiuri MC, Vitale I, Zischka H, Castedo M, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Cell Death Modalities: Classification and Pathophysiological Implications. Cell Death Differ. 2007;12:1237–1266. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Maiuri MC, Zalckvar E, Kimchi A, Kroemer G. Self-Eating and Self-Killing: Crosstalk Between Autophagy and Apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:741–752. doi: 10.1038/nrm2239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Plathow C, Weber WA. Tumor Cell Metabolism Imaging. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:43S–63S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.045930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Salskov A, Tammisetti VS, Grierson J, Vesselle H. FLT: Measuring Tumor Cell Proliferation In Vivo With Positron Emission Tomography and 3′-Deoxy-3′-[18F]Fluorothymidine. Semin Nucl Med. 2007;37:429–439. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2007.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lahorte CMM, Vanderheyden JL, Steinmetz N, Van de Wiele C, Dierckx RA, Slegers G. Apoptosis-Detecting Radioligands: Current State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:887–919. doi: 10.1007/s00259-004-1555-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Boersma HH, Kietselaer BL, Stolk LM, Bennaghmouch A, Hofstra L, Narula J, Heidendal GAK, Reutelingsperger CP. Past, Present, and Future of Annexin A5: From Protein Discovery to Clinical Applications. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:2035–2050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Blankenberg FG. In Vivo Detection of Apoptosis. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:81S–95S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.045898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smith G, Nguyen QD, Aboagye EO. Translational Imaging of Apoptosis. Anti-Cancer Agent Med Chem. 2009;9:958–967. doi: 10.2174/187152009789377709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhao M. In Vivo Apoptosis Imaging Agents and Strategies. Anti-Cancer Agent Med Chem. 2009;9:1018–1023. doi: 10.2174/187152009789377691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Faust A, Herman S, Wagner S, Haufe G, Schober O, Schäfers M, Kopka K. Molecular Imaging of Apoptosis In Vivo with Scintigraphic and Optical Biomarkers – a Status Report. Anti-Cancer Agent Med Chem. 2009;9:968–985. doi: 10.2174/187152009789377754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.James ML, Gambhir SS. A Molecular Imaging Primer: Modalities, Imaging Agents, and Applications. Physiol Rev. 2012;92:897–965. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00049.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rao J, Dragulescu-Andrasi A, Yao H. Fluorescence Imaging In Vivo: Recent Advances. Curr Opin Biotech. 2007;18:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Keyaerts M, Caveliers V, Lahouette T. Bioluminescence Imaging: Looking Beyond the Light. TRENDS Mol Med. 2012;18:164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Leblond F, Davis SC, Valdés PA, Pogue BW. Pre-Clinical Whole-Body Fluorescence Imaging: Review of Instruments, Methods and Applications. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2010;98:77–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Willmann JK, van Bruggen N, Dinkelborg LM, Gambhir SS. Molecular Imaging in Drug Development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:591–607. doi: 10.1038/nrd2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sosnovik DE, Weissleder R. Emerging Concepts in Molecular MRI. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007;18:4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li J, Yuan J. Caspases in Apoptosis and Beyond. Oncogene. 2008;27:6194–6206. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pop C, Salvesen GS. Human Caspases: Activation, Specificity, and Regulation. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:21777–21781. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R800084200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fuentes-Prior P, Salvesen GS. The Protein Structures that Shape Caspase Activity, Specificity, Activation and Inhibition. Biochem J. 2004;384:201–232. doi: 10.1042/BJ20041142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Debunne M, Portal C, Delest B, Brakenhielm E, Lallemand F, Henry JP, Ligeret H, Noack P, Massonneau M, Romieu A, Renard PY, Thuillez C, Richard V. In Vitro and Ex Vivo Evaluation of Smart Infra-Red Fluorescent Caspase-3 Probes for Molecular Imaging of Cardiovascular Apoptosis. Int J Mol Imaging. 2011 doi: 10.1155/2011/413290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Joseph J, Seervi M, Sobhan PK, Retnabai ST. High Throughput Ratio Imaging to Profile Caspase Activity: Potential Application in Multiparameter High Content Apoptosis Analysis and Drug Screening. PLOS One. 2011;6:e20114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Keese M, Yagublu V, Schwenke K, Post S, Bastiaens P. Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy of Chemotherapy-Induced Apoptosis Resistance in a Syngenic Mouse Tumor Model. Int J Cancer. 2010;126:104–113. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang Z, Fan J, Cheney PP, Berezin MY, Edwards WB, Akers WJ, Shen D, Liang K, Culver JP, Achilefu S. Activatable Molecular Systems Using Homologous Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probes for Monitoring Enzyme Activities In Vitro, In Cellulo, and In Vivo. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2009;6:416–427. doi: 10.1021/mp800264k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bullock KE, Maxwell D, Kesarwala AH, Gammon S, Prior JL, Snow M, Stanley S, Piwnica-Worms D. Biochemical and In Vivo Characterization of a Small, Membrane-Permeant, Caspase-Activatable Far-Red Fluorescent Peptide for Imaging Apoptosis. Biochemistry. 2007;46:4055–4065. doi: 10.1021/bi061959n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Barnett EM, Zhang X, Maxwell D, Chang Q, Piwnica-Worms D. Single-Cell Imaging of Retinal Ganglion Cell Apoptosis with a Cell-Penetrating, Activatable Peptide Probe in an In Vivo Glaucoma Model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:9391–9396. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812884106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Maxwell D, Chang Q, Zhang X, Barnett EM, Piwnica-Worms D. An Improved Cell-Penetrating, Caspase-Activatable, Near-Infrared Fluorescent Peptide for Apoptosis Imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009;20:702–709. doi: 10.1021/bc800516n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sun IC, Lee S, Koo H, Kwon IC, Choi K, Ahn CH, Kim K. Caspase Sensitive Gold Nanoparticle for Apoptosis Imaging in Live Cells. Bioconjugate Chem. 2010;21:1939–1942. doi: 10.1021/bc1003026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jun YW, Sheikholeslami S, Hostetter DR, Tajon C, Craik CS, Alivisatos AP. Continuous Imaging of Plasmon Rulers in Live Cells Reveals Early-Stage Caspase-3 Activation at the Single-Molecule Level. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:17735–17740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907367106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lin SY, Chen NT, Sun SP, Chang JC, Wang YC, Yang CS, Lo LW. The Protease-Mediated Nucleus Shuttles of Subnanometer Gold Quantum Dots for Real-Time Monitoring of Apoptotic Cell Death. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:8309–8315. doi: 10.1021/ja100561k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cao CY, Chen Y, Wu FZ, Deng Y, Liang GL. Caspase-3 Controlled Assembly of Nanoparticles for Fluorescence Turn On. Chem Commun. 2011;47:10320–10322. doi: 10.1039/c1cc14112k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Huang H, Swierczewska M, Choi KY, Zhu L, Bhirde A, Park J, Kim K, Xie J, Niu G, Lee KC, Lee S, Chen X. Multiplex Imaging of an Intracellular Proteolytic Cascade by using a Broad-Spectrum Nanoquencher. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:1625–1630. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Laxman B, Hall DE, Bhojani MS, Hamstra DA, Chenevert TL, Ross BD, Tehemtulla A. Noninvasive Real-Time Imaging of Apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:16551–16555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252644499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gammon ST, Villalobos VM, Roshal M, Samrakandi M, Piwnica-Worms D. Rational Design of Novel Red-Shifted BRET Pairs: Platforms for Real-Time Single-Chain Protease Biosensors. Biotechnol Prog. 2009;25:559–569. doi: 10.1002/btpr.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kanno A, Yamanaka Y, Hirano H, Umezawa Y, Ozawa T. Cyclic Luciferase for Real-Time Sensing of Caspase-3 Activities in Living Animals. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:7595–7599. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ray P, De A, Patel M, Gambhir SS. Monitoring Caspase-3 Activation with a Multimodality Imaging Sensor in Living Subjects. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:5801–5809. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Niers JM, Kerami M, Pike L, Lewandrowski G, Tannous BA. Multimodal In Vivo Imaging and Blood Monitoring of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Apoptosis. Mol Therapy. 2011;19:1090–1096. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Coppola JM, Ross BD, Rehemtulla A. Noninvasive Imaging of Apoptosis and Its Application in Cancer Therapeutics. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2492–2501. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hickson J, Achler S, Klaubert D, Bouska J, Ellis P, Foster K, Oleksijew A, Rodriguez L, Schlessinger S, Wang B, Frost D. Noninvasive Molecular Imaging of Apoptosis In Vivo Using a Modified Firefly Luciferase Substrate, Z-DEVD-Aminoluciferin. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:1003–1010. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lee D, Long SA, Adams JL, Chan G, Vaidya KS, Francis TA, Kikly K, Winkler JD, Sung CM, Debouck C, Richardson S, Levy MA, Dewolf WE, Jr, Keller PM, Tomaszek T, Head MS, Ryan MD, Haltiwanger RC, Liang PH, Janson CA, McDevitt PJ, Johanson K, Concha NO, Chan W, Abdel-Meguid SS, Badger AM, Lark MW, Nadeau DP, Suva LJ, Gowen M, Nuttall ME. Potent and Selective Nonpeptide Inhibitors of Caspases 3 and 7 Inhibit Apoptosis and Maintain Cell Functionality. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:16007–16014. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.21.16007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nguyen QD, Smith G, Glaser M, Perumal M, Årstad E, Aboagye EO. Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Drug-Induced Tumor Apoptosis with a Caspase-3/7 Specific [18F]-Labeled Isatin Sulfonamide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:16375–16380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901310106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Smith G, Glaser M, Perumal M, Nguyen QD, Shan B, Arstad E, Aboagye EO. Design, Synthesis, and Biological Characterization of a Caspase 3/7 Selective Isatin Labeled with 2-[18F]Fluroethylazide. J Med Chem. 2008;51:8057–8067. doi: 10.1021/jm801107u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nguyen QD, Challapalli A, Smith G, Fortt R, Aboagye EO. Imaging Apoptosis with Positron Emission Tomography: ‘Bench to Bedside’ Development of the Caspase-3/7 Specific Radiotracer [18F]ICMT-11. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:432–440. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhou D, Chu W, Chen DL, Wang Q, Reichert DE, Rothfuss J, D’Avignon A, Welch MJ, Mach RH. [18F]- and [11C]-Labled N-Benzyl-Isatin Sulfonamide Analogues as PET Tracers for Apoptosis: Synthesis, Radiolabeling Mechanism, and In Vivo Imaging Study of Apoptosis in Fas-Treated Mice using [11C]WC-98. Org Biomol Chem. 2009;7:1337–1348. doi: 10.1039/b819024k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chen DL, Zhou D, Chu W, Herrbrich PE, Jones LA, Rothfuss JM, Engle JT, Geraci M, Welch MJ, Mach RH. Comparison of Radiolabeled Isatin Analogs for Imaging Apoptosis with Positron Emission Tomography. Nucl Med Biol. 2009;36:651–658. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Powers JC, Asgian JL, Ekici OD, James KE. Irreversible Inhibitors of Serine, Cysteine, and Threonine Proteases. Chem Rev. 2002;102:4639–4750. doi: 10.1021/cr010182v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Edgington LE, Berger AB, Blum G, Albrow VE, Paulick MG, Lineberry N, Bogyo M. Noninvasive Optical Imaging of Apoptosis by Caspase-Targeted Activity-Based Probes. Nat Med. 2009;8:967–973. doi: 10.1038/nm.1938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Launay S, Hermine O, Fontenay M, Kroemer G, Solary E, Garrido C. Vital Functions for Lethal Caspases. Oncogene. 2005;24:5137–5148. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fernando P, Brunette S, Megeney LA. Neural Stem Cell Differentiation is Dependent upon Endogenous Caspase 3 Activity. FASEB J. 2005;19:1671–1673. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-2981fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yi CH, Yuan J. The Jekyll and Hyde Functions of Caspases. Dev Cell. 2009;16:21–34. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rozman-Pungerčar J, Kopitar-Jerala N, Bogyo M, Turk D, Vasiljeva O, Stefe I, Vandenabeele P, Brömme D, Puizdar V, Fonović M, Trstenjak-Prebanda M, Dolenc I, Turk V, Turk B. Inhibition of Palpain-Like Cysteine Proteases and Legumain by Caspase-Specific Inhibitors: When Reaction Mechanism is More Important than Specificity. Cell Death Differ. 2003;10:881–888. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ly JD, Grubb DR, Lawen A. The Mitochondrial Membrane Potential (ΔΨm) in Apoptosis; an Update. Apoptosis. 2003;8:115–128. doi: 10.1023/a:1022945107762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ross MF, Kelso GF, Blaikie FH, James AM, Cochemé HM, Filipovska A, Da Ros T, Hurd TR, Smith RAJ, Murphy MP. Lipophilic Triphenylphosphonium Cations as Tools in Mitchondrial Bioenergetics and Free Radical Biology. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2005;70:222–230. doi: 10.1007/s10541-005-0104-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nguyen QD, Aboagye EO. Imaging the Life and Death of Tumors in Living Subjects: Preclinical PET Imaging of Proliferation and Apoptosis. Integr Biol. 2010;2:483–495. doi: 10.1039/c0ib00066c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Madar I, Huang Y, Ravert H, Dairymple SL, Davidson NE, Isaacs JT, Dannals RF, Frost JJ. Detection and Quantification of the Evolution Dynamics of Apoptosis Using the PET Voltage Sensor 18F-Fluorobenzyl Triphenyl Phosphonium. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:774–780. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.061283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Madar I, Ravert H, Neikin B, Abro M, Pomper M, Dannals R, Frost JJ. Characterization of Membrane Potential-Dependent Uptake of the Novel PET Tracer 18F-Fluorobenzyl Triphenylphosphonium Cation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:2057–2065. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0500-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pace NJ, Pimental DR, Weerapana E. An Inhibitor of Glutathione S-Transferase Omega 1 that Selectively Targets Apoptotic Cells. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:8365–8368. doi: 10.1002/anie.201203730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kenan DJ, Keene JD. La Gets Its Wings. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11:303–305. doi: 10.1038/nsmb0404-303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Al-Ejeh F, Darby JM, Brown MP. The La Autoantigen is a Malignancy-Associated Cell Death Target that is Induced by DNA-Damaging Drugs. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:5509s–5518s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Al-Ejeh F, Darby JM, Pensa K, Diener KR, Hayball JD, Brown MP. In Vivo Targeting of Dead Tumor Cells in a Murine Tumor Model using a Monoclonal Antibody Specific for the La Autoantigen. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:5519s–5527s. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Al-Ejeh F, Darby JM, Tsopelas C, Smyth D, Manavis J, Brown MP. APOMAB, a La-Specific Monoclonal Antibody, Detects the Apoptotic Tumor Response to Life-Prolonging and DNA-Damaging Chemotherapy. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Park D, Don AS, Massamiri T, Karwa A, Warner B, MacDondald J, Hemenway C, Naik A, Kuan KT, Dilda PJ, Wong JW, Camphausen K, Chinen L, Dyszlewski M, Hogg PJ. Noninvasive Imaging of Cell Death using an Hsp90 Ligand. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:2832–2835. doi: 10.1021/ja110226y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chekeni FB, Elliot MR, Sandilos JK, Walk SF, Kinchen JM, Lazarowski ER, Armstrong AJ, Penuela S, Laird DW, Salvesen GS, Isakson BE, Bayliss DA, Ravichandran KS. Pannexin 1 Channels Mediate “Find-Me” Signal Release and Membrane Permeability During Apoptosis. Nature. 2010;467:863–867. doi: 10.1038/nature09413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Emoto K, Toyama-Sorimachi N, Karasuyama H, Inoue K, Umeda M. Exposure of Phosphatidylethanolamine on the Surface of Apoptotic Cells. Exp Cell Res. 1997;232:430–434. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Vangestel C, Van de Wiele C, Van Damme N, Staelens S, Pauwels P, Reutelingsperger CP, Peeters MJ. 99mTc-(CO)3 His-Annexin A5 Micro-SPECT Demonstrates Increased Cell Death by Irinotecan During the Vascular Normalization Window Caused by Bevacizumab. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1786–1794. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.092650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Toretsky J, Levenson A, Weinberg IN, Tait JF, Uren A, Mease RC. Preparation of F-18 Labeled Annexin V: a Potential PET Radiopharmaceutical for Imaging Cell Death. Nucl Med Biol. 2004;31:747–752. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2004.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sosnovik DE, Garanger E, Aikawa E, Nahrendorf M, Figuiredo JL, Dai G, Reynolds F, Rosenzweig A, Weissleder R, Josephson L. Molecular MRI of Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis with Simultaneous Delayed Enhancement MRI Distinguishes Apoptotic and Necrotic Myocytes In Vivo: Potential for Midmyocardial Salvage in Acute Ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:460–467. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.859678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Min PK, Lim S, Kang SJ, Hong SY, Hwang KC, Chung KH, Shim CY, Rim SJ, Chung N. Targeted Ultrasound Imaging of Apoptosis with Annexin A5 Microbubbles in Acute Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2010;18:91–97. doi: 10.4250/jcu.2010.18.3.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ntziachristos V, Chellenberger EA, Ripoll J, Yessayan D, Graves E, Bogdanov A, Jr, Josephson L, Weissleder R. Visualization of Antitumor Treatment by Means of Fluorescence Molecular Tomography with an Annexin V-Cy5.5 Conjugate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:12294–12299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401137101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kapty J, Murray D, Mercer J. Radiotracers for Noninvasive Molecular Imaging of Tumor Cell Death. Cancer Biother Radio. 2010;25:615–628. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2010.0793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Beekman CAC, Buckle T, van Leeuwen AC, Valdés Olmos RA, Verheij M, Rottenberg S, van Leeuwen FWB. Questioning the Value of 99mTc-HYNIC-Annexin V Based Response Monitoring After Docetaxel Treatment in a Mouse Model for Hereditary Breast Cancer. Appl Radiat Isot. 2011;69:656–662. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lederle W, Arns S, Rix A, Gremse F, Doleschel D, Schmalijohann J, Mottaghy FM, Kiessling F, Palmowski M. Failure of Annexin-Based Apoptosis Imaging in the Assessment of Antiangiogenic Therapy Effects. EJNMMI Res. 2011;1:26. doi: 10.1186/2191-219X-1-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Niu G, Chen X. Apoptosis Imaging: Beyond Annexin V. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1659–1662. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.078584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Demchenko AP. Beyond Annexin V: Fluorescence Response of Cellular Membranes to Apoptosis. Cytotechnology. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s10616-012-9481-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kuge Y, Zhao S, Takei T, Tamaki N. Molecular Imaging of Apoptosis with Radio-Labeled Annexin A5 Focused on the Evaluation of Tumor Response to Chemotherapy. Anti-Cancer Agent Med Chem. 2009;9:1003–1011. doi: 10.2174/187152009789377736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Loose D, Vermeersch H, De Vos F, Deron P, Slegers G, Van de Wiele C. Prognostic Value of 99mTc-HYNIC Annexin-V Imaging in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:47–52. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0577-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Fonge H, de Saint Hubert M, Vunickx K, Rattat D, Nuyts J, Bormans G, Ni Y, Reutelingsperger C, Verbruggen A. Preliminary In Vivo Evaluation of a Novel 99mTc-Labeled HYNIC-cys-Annexin A5 as an Apoptosis Imaging Agent. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:3794–3798. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.05.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Greupink R, Sio CF, Ederveen A, Orsel J. Evaluation of a 99mTc-Labeled Annexin A5 Variant for Non-Invasive SPECT Imaging of Cell Death in Liver, Spleen, and Prostate. Pharm Res. 2009;26:2647–2656. doi: 10.1007/s11095-009-9981-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Vangestel C, Peeters M, Oltenfreiter R, D’Asseler Y, Staelens S, Van Steenkiste M, Philippé J, Kusters D, Reutelingsperger C, Van Damme N, Van de Wiele C. In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of [99mTc]-Labeled Tricarbonyl His-Annexin A5 as an Imaging Agent for the Detection of Phosphatidylserine-Expressing Cells. Nucl Med Biol. 2010;37:965–975. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kurihara H, Yang DJ, Cristofanilli M, Erwin WD, Yu DF, Kohanim S, Mendez R, Kim EE. Imaging and Dosimetry of 99mTc-EC-Annexin V: Preliminary Clinical Study Targeting Apoptosis in Breast Tumors. Appl Radiat Isot. 2008;66:1175–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bauwens M, De Saint-Hubert M, Devos E, Deckers N, Reutelingsperger C, Mortelmans L, Himmelreich U, Mottaghy FM, Verbruggen A. Site-Specific 68Ga-Labeled Annexin A5 as a PET Imaging Agent for Apoptosis. Nucl Med Biol. 2011;38:381–392. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Li X, Link JM, Stekhova S, Yagle KJ, Smith C, Krohn KA, Tait JF. Site-Specific Labeling of Annexin V with F-18 for Apoptosis Imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008;19:1684–1688. doi: 10.1021/bc800164d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Hu S, Kiesewetter DO, Zhu L, Guo N, Gao H, Liu G, Hida N, Lang L, Niu G, Chen X. Longitudinal PET Imaging of Doxorubicin-Induced Cell Death with 18F-Annexin V. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s11307-012-0551-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Cheng Q, Lu L, Grafstöm MH, Thorell JO, Samén E, Johansson K, Ahlzén HS, Stone-Elander S, Linder S, Arnér ESJ Sel-tag Imaging Project. Combining [11C]-AnxA5 PET Imaging with Serum Biomarkers for Improved Detection in Live Mice of Modest Cell Death in Human Solid Tumor Xenografts. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Cauchon N, Langlois R, Rousseau JA, Tessier G, Cadorette J, Lecomte R, Hunting DJ, Pavan RA, Zeisler SK, van Lier JE. PET Imaging of Apoptosis with 64Cu-Labeled Streptavidin Following Pretargeting of Phosphatidylserine with Biotinylated Annexin-V. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:247–258. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0199-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Kenis H, van Genderen H, Bennaghmouchm A, Rinia HA, Frederik P, Narula J, Hofstra L, Reutelingsperger CP. Cell Surface-Expressed Phosphatidylserine and Annexin A5 Open a Novel Portal of Cell Entry. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:52623–52629. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409009200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.van Tilborg GA, Geelen T, Duimel H, Bomans PH, Frederik PM, Sanders HM, Deckers NM, Reutelingsperger CP, Strijkers GJ, Nicolay K. Internalization of Annexin A5-functionalized Iron Oxide Particles by Apoptotic Jurkat Cells. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2009;4:24–32. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ungethüm L, Kenis H, Nicolaes GA, Autin L, Stoilova-McPhie S, Reutelingsperger CP. Engineered Annexin A5 Variants have Impaired Cell Entry for Molecular Imaging of Apoptosis using Pretargeting Strategies. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:1903–1910. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.163527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Fang W, Wang F, Ji S, Zhu X, Meier HT, Hellman RS, Brindle KM, Davletov B, Zhao M. SPECT Imaging of Myocardial Infarction Using 99mTc-Labeled C2A Domain of Synaptotagmin I in a Porcine Ischemia-Reperfusion Model. Nucl Med Biol. 2007;34:917–923. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Wang F, Fang W, Zhoa M, Wang Z, Ji S, Li Y, Zheng Y. Imaging Paclitaxel (Chemotherapy)-Induced Tumor Apoptosis with 99mTc C2A, a domain of Synaptotagmin I: a Preliminary Study. Nucl Med Biol. 2008;35:359–364. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Wang F, Fang W, Zhang MR, Zhao M, Liu B, Wang Z, Hua Z, Yang M, Kumata K, Hatori A, Yamasaki T, Yanamoto K, Suzuki K. Evaluation of Chemotherapy Response in VX2 Rabbit Lung Cancer with 18F-Labeled C2A Domain of Synaptotagmin I. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:592–599. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.081588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Tavaré R, Torres Martin de Rosales R, Blower PJ, Mullen GE. Efficient Site-Specific Radiolabeling of a Modified C2A Domain of Synaptotagmin I with [99mTc(CO)3]+: a New Radiopharmaceutical for Imaging Cell Death. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009;20:2071–2081. doi: 10.1021/bc900160j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Alam IS, Neves AA, Witney TH, Boren J, Brindle KM. Comparison of the C2A Domain of Synaptotagmin-I and Annexin-V as Probes for Detecting Cell Death. Bioconjugate Chem. 2010;21:884–891. doi: 10.1021/bc9004415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Yeung T, Gilbert GE, Shi J, Silvius J, Kapus A, Grinstein S. Membrane Phosphatidylserine Regulates Surface Charge and Protein Localization. Science. 2008;319:210–213. doi: 10.1126/science.1152066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Hou J, Fu Y, Zhou J, Li W, Xie R, Cao F, Gilbert GE, Shi J. Lactadherin Functions as a Probe for Phosphatidylserine Exposure and as an Anticoagulant in the Study of Stored Platelets. Vox Sanguins. 2011;100:187–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01375.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Falborg L, Waehrens LN, Alsner J, Bluhme H, Frökiaer J, Heegaard CW, Horseman MR, Rasmussen JT, Rehling M. Biodistribution of 99mTc-HYNIC-Lactadherin in Mice – A PotentialTracer for Visualizing Apoptosis In Vivo. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2010;70:209–216. doi: 10.3109/00365511003663648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Burtea C, Laurent S, Lancelot E, Ballet S, Murariu O, Rousseaux O, Port M, Vander Elst L, Corot C, Muller RN. Peptidic Targeting of Phosphatidylserine for the MRI Detection of Apoptosis in Atherosclerotic Plaques. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2009;6:1903–1919. doi: 10.1021/mp900106m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Laumonier C, Segers J, Laurent S, Michel A, Coppée F, Belayew A, Vander Elst L, Muller RN. A New Peptide Vector for Molecular Imaging of Apoptosis Identified by Phage Display Technology. J Biomol Screen. 2006;11:537–545. doi: 10.1177/1087057106288220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Radermacher KA, Boutry S, Laurent S, Elst LV, Mahieu I, Bouzin C, Magat J, Gregoire V, Feron O, Muller RN, Jordan BF, Gallez B. Iron Oxide Particles Covered with Hexapeptides Targeted at Phosphatidylserine as MR Biomarkers of Tumor Cell Death. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2010;5:258–267. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Radermacher KA, Magat J, Bouzin C, Laurent S, Dresselaers T, Himmelreich U, Boutry S, Mahieu I, Vander Elst L, Feron O, Muller RN, Jordan BF, Gallez B. Multimodal Assessment of Early Tumor Response to Chemotherapy: Comparison Between Diffusion-Weighted MRI, 1H-MR Spectroscopy of Choline and USPIO Particles Targeted at Cell Death. NMR Biomed. 2011;25:514–522. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Burtea C, Ballet S, Laurent S, Rousseaux O, Dencausse A, Gonzalez W, Port M, Corot C, Vander Elst L, Muller RN. Development of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for the Characterization of Atherosclerotic Plaque by Using Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 and Apoptosis-Targeted Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Derivatives. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32:e36–348. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.245415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Thapa N, Kim S, So IS, Lee BH, Kwon IC, Choi K, Kim IS. Discovery of a Phosphatidylserine-Recognizing Peptide and Its Utility in Molecular Imaging of Tumour Apoptosis. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:1649–1660. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00305.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Shao R, Xiong C, Wen X, Gelovani JG, Li C. Targeting Phosphatidylserine on Apoptotic Cells with Phages and Peptides Selected from a Bacteriophage Display Library. Mol Imaging. 2007;6:417–426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Xiong C, Brewer K, Song S, Zhang R, Lu W, Wen X, Li C. Peptide-Based Imaging Agents Targeting Phosphatidylserine for the Detection of Apoptosis. J Med Chem. 2011;54:1825–1835. doi: 10.1021/jm101477d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Zheng H, Wang F, Wang Q, Gao J. Cofactor-Free Detection of Phosphatidylserine with Cyclic Peptides Mimicking Lactadherin. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:15280–15283. doi: 10.1021/ja205911n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hanshaw RG, Lakshmi C, Lambert TN, Smith BD. Fluorescent Detection of Apoptotic Cells by Using Zinc Coordination Complexes with a Selective Affinity for Membrane Surfaces Enriched with Phosphatidylserine. ChemBioChem. 2005;12:2214–2220. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200500149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Smith BA, Akers WJ, Leevy WM, Lampkins AJ, Xiao S, Wolter W, Suckow MA, Achilefu S, Smith BD. Optical Imaging of Mammary and Prostate Tumors in Living Animals Using a Synthetic Near Infrared Zinc(II)-Dipicolylamine Probe for Anionic Cell Surfaces. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:67–69. doi: 10.1021/ja908467y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Smith BA, Gammon ST, Xiao S, Wang W, Chapman S, McDermott R, Suckow MA, Johnson JR, Piwnica-Worms D, Gokel GW, Smith BD, Leevy WM. In Vivo Optical Imaging of Acute Cell Death Using a Near-Infrared Fluorescent Zinc-Dipicolylamine Probe. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2011;8:583–590. doi: 10.1021/mp100395u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Smith BA, Xiao S, Wolter W, Wheeler J, Suckow MA, Smith BD. In Vivo Targeting of Cell Death Using a Synthetic Fluorescent Molecular Probe. Apoptosis. 2011;16:722–731. doi: 10.1007/s10495-011-0601-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Smith BA, Daschbach MM, Gammon ST, Xiao S, Chapman SE, Hudson C, Suckow MA, Piwnica-Worms D, Gokel GW, Leevy WM. In Vivo Cell Death Mediated by Synthetic Ion Channels. Chem Commun. 2011;47:7977–7979. doi: 10.1039/c1cc12933c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Hu S, Chai W, Liu Z, Yin C, Lei M. Near-Infrared Fluorescent Zinc-Dipicolylamine: a New Molecular Imaging Probe to Monitor the Efficiency of Chemotherapy. J Cent South Univ Med Sci. 2011;36:760–764. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2011.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Smith BA, Xie B, van Beek ER, Que I, Blankevoort V, Xiao S, Cole E, Hoehn M, Kaijzel EL, Löwik CWGM, Smith BD. Multicolor Fluorescence Imaging of Traumatic Brain Injury in a Cryolesion Mouse Model. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2012;3:530–537. doi: 10.1021/cn3000197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.wyffels L, Gray BD, Barber C, Moore SK, Woolfenden JM, Pak KY, Liu Z. Synthesis and Preliminary Evaluation of Radiolabeled Bis(Zinc(II)-Dipicolylamine) Coordination Complexes as Cell Death Imaging Agents. Bioorg Med Chem. 2011;19:3425–3433. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.04.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Surman AJ, Kenny GD, Kumar DK, Bell JD, Casey DR, Vilar R. Targeting of Anionic Membrane Species by Lanthanide(III) Complexes: Towards Improved MRI Contrast Agents for Apoptosis. Chem Commun. 2011;47:10245–10247. doi: 10.1039/c1cc13284a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Quinti L, Weissleder R, Tung CH. A Fluorescent Nanosensor for Apoptotic Cells. Nano Lett. 2006;6:488–490. doi: 10.1021/nl0524694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Oltmanns D, Zitzmann-Kolbe S, Mueller A, Bauder-Wuest U, Schaefer M, Eder M, Haberkorn U, Eisenhut M. Zn(II)-Bis(Cyclen) Complexes and the Imaging of Apoptosis/Necrosis. Bioconjugate Chem. 2011;2011:22611–2624. doi: 10.1021/bc200457b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Zhao M. Lantibiotics as Probes for Phosphatidylethanolamine. Amino Acids. 2011;41:1071–1079. doi: 10.1007/s00726-009-0386-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Zhao M, Li Z, Bugenhagen S. 99mTc-Labeled Duramycin as a Novel Phosphatidylethanolamine-Binding Molecular Probe. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1345–1352. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.048603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Marconescu A, Thorpe PE. Coincident Exposure of Phosphatidylethanolamine and Anionic Phospholipids on the Surface of Irradiated Cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778:2217–2224. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Stafford JH, Thorpe PE. Increased Exposure of Phosphatidylethanolamine on the Surface of Tumor Vascular Endothelium. Neoplasia. 2011;13:299–308. doi: 10.1593/neo.101366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Simhadri VR, Andersen JF, Calvo E, Choi SC, Coligan JE, Borrego F. Human CD300a Binds to Phosphatidylethanolamine and Phosphatidylserine, and Modulates the Phagocytosis of Dead Cells. Blood. 2012;119:2799–2809. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-372425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Elliot JI, Surprenant A, Marelli-Berg FM, Cooper JC, Cassady-Cain RL, Wooding C, Linton K, Alexander DR, Higgins CF. Membrane Phosphatidylserine Distribution as a Non-Apoptotic Signalling Mechanism in Lymphocytes. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:808–816. doi: 10.1038/ncb1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Ran S, Downes A, Thorpe PE. Increased Exposure of Anionic Phospholipids on the Surface of Tumor Blood Vessels. Cancer Res. 2002;62:6132–6140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Riedl S, Rinner B, Asslaber M, Schaider H, Walzer S, Novak A, Lohner K, Zweytick D. In Search of a Novel Target – Phosphatidylserine Exposed by Non-Apoptotic Tumor Cells and Metastases of Malignancies with Poor Treatment Efficacy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1808:2638–2645. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Lima LG, Chammas R, Monteiro RQ, Moreira ME, Barcinski MA. Tumor-Derived Microvesicles Modulate the Establishment of Metastatic Melanoma in a Phosphatidylserine-Dependent Manner. Cancer Lett. 2009;283:168–175. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.03.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Radic M, Marion T, Monestier M. Nucleosomes are Exposed at the Cell Surface in Apoptosis. J Immunol. 2004;172:6692–6700. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.11.6692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Ohsawa S, Hamada S, Yoshida H, Miura M. Caspase-Mediated Changes in Histone H1 in Early Apoptosis: Prolonged Caspase Activation in Devloping Olfactory Sensory Neurons. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:1429–1439. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Wang K, Purushotham S, Lee JY, Na MH, Park H, Oh SJ, Park RW, Park JY, Lee E, Cho BC, Song MN, Maek MC, Kwak W, Yoo J, Hoffman AS, Oh YK, Kim IS, Lee BH. In Vivo Imaging of Tumor Apoptosis using Histone H1-Targeting Peptide. J Control Release. 2010;148:283–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Lee MJ, Wang K, Kim IS, Lee BH, Han HS. Molecular Imaging of Cell Death in an Experimental Model of Parkinson’s Disease with a Novel Apoptosis-Targeting Peptide. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012;14:147–155. doi: 10.1007/s11307-011-0497-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Reshef A, Shirvan A, Grimberg H, Levin G, Cohen A, Mayk A, Kidron D, Djaldetti R, Melamed E, Ziv I. Novel Molecular Imaging of Cell Death in Experimental Cerebral Stroke. Brain Res. 2007;1144:156–164. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Reshef A, Shirvan A, Shohami E, Grimberg H, Levin G, Cohen A, Trembovier V, Ziv I. Targeting Cell Death In Vivo in Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury by a Novel Molecular Probe. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25:569–580. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.0341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Levin G, Shirvan A, Gromberg H, Reshef A, Yogev-Falach M, Cohen A, Ziv I. Novel Fluorescence Molecular Imaging of Chemotherapy-Induced Intestinal Apoptosis. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14:054019. doi: 10.1117/1.3253303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Zeng W, Yao ML, Townsend D, Kabalka G, Wall J, Le Puil M, Biggerstaff J, Miao W. Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Radiochemical Labeling of a Dansylhydrazone Derivative as a Potential Imaging Agent for Apoptosis. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:3573–3577. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Zhang X, Paule MG, Newport GD, Sadovova N, Berridge MS, Apana SM, Kabalka G, Miao W, Slikker W, Jr, Wang C. MicroPET Imaging of Ketamine-Induced Neuronal Apoptosis with Radiolabeled DFNSH. J Neural Transm. 2011;118:203–211. doi: 10.1007/s00702-010-0499-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Cohen A, Shirvan A, Levin G, Grimberg H, Reshef A, Ziv I. From the Gla Doman to a Novel Small-Molecule Detector of Apoptosis. Cell Res. 2009;19:625–637. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Reshef A, Shirvan A, Waterhouse RN, Grimberg H, Levin G, Cohen A, Ulysse LG, Friedman G, Antoni G, Ziv I. Molecular Imaging Neurovascular Cell Death in Experimental Cerebral Stroke by PET. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1520–1528. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.043919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Hoglund J, Shirvan, Antoni G, Gistavsson SÅ, Långström B, Ringheim A, Sörensen J, Ben-Ami M, Ziv I. 18F-ML-10, a PET Tracer for Apoptosis: First Human Study. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:720–725. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.081786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Allen AM, Ben-Ami M, Reshef A, Steinmetz A, Kundel Y, Inbar E, Djaldetti R, Davidson T, Fenig E, Ziv I. Assessment of Response of Brain Metastases to Radiotherapy by PET Imaging of Apoptosis with 18F-ML-10. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1400–1408. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2150-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Bauwens M, De Saint-Hubert M, Cleyhens J, Brams L, Devos E, Mottaghy FM, Verbruggen A. Radioiodinated Phenylalkyl Malonic Acid Derivatives as pH-Sensitive SPECT Tracers. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Gallagher FA, Kettunen MI, Hu DE, Jensen PR, Zandt RI, Karlsson M, Gisselsson A, Nelson SK, Witney TH, Bohndiek SE, Hansson G, Peitersen T, Lerche MH, Brindle KM. Production of Hyperpolarized [1,4-13C2]Malate from [1,4-13C2]Fumarate is a Marker of Cell Necrosis and Treatment Response in Tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:19801–19806. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911447106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Dasari M, Lee S, Sy J, Kim D, Lee S, Brown M, Davis M, Murthy N. Hoechst-IR: an Imaging Agent that Detects Necrotic Tissue In Vivo by Binding Extracellular DNA. Org Lett. 2010;12:3300–3303. doi: 10.1021/ol100923d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Garanger E, Hilderbrand SA, Blois JT, Sosnovik DE, Weissleder R, Josephson L. A DNA-Binding Gd Chelate for the Detection of Cell Death by MRI. Chem Commun. 2009;29:4444–4446. doi: 10.1039/b907375b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Huang S, Chen HH, Yuan H, Dai G, Schuhle DT, Mekkaoui C, Ngoy S, Liao R, Caravan P, Josephson L, Sosnovik DE. Molecular MRI of Acute Necrosis with a Novel DNA-Binding Gadolinium Chelate: Kinetics of Cell Death and Clearance in Infarcted Myocardium. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:729–737. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.966374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Telford WG, King LE, Fraker PJ. Comparative Evaluation of Several DNA Binding Dyes in the Detection of Apoptosis-Associated Chromatin Degradation by Flow Cytometry. Cytometry. 1992;13:137–143. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990130205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Ni Y, Huyghe D, Verbeke K, de Witte PA, Nuyts J, Mortelmans L, Chen F, Marchal G, Verbruggen AM, Bormans GM. First Preclinical Evaluation of Mono-[123I]Iodohypericin as a Necrosis-Avid Tracer Agent. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:595–601. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-0013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Fonge H, Jin L, Wang H, Ni Y, Bormans GM, Verbruggen AM. Synthesis and Preliminary Evalulation of Mono-[123I]Iodohypericin Monocarboxylic Acid as a Necrosis Avid Imaging Agent. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2007;17:4001–4005. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.04.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Marysael T, Bauwens M, Ni Y, Bormans GM, Rozenski J, de Witte PA. Pretargeting of Necrotic Tumors with Biotinylated Hypericin Using 123I-Labeled Avidin: Evaluation of a Two-Step Strategy. Invest New Drugs. 2011 doi: 10.1007/s10637-011-9778-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Wynn JL, Cotton TM. Spectroscopic Properties of Hypericin in Solution and at Surface. J Phys Chem. 1995;99:4317–4323. [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Van de Putte M, Wang H, Chen F, De Witte PA, Ni Y. Hypericin as a Marker for Determination of Tissue Viability after Radiofrequency Ablation in a Murine Liver Tumor Model. Oncol Rep. 2008;19:927–932. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Song S, Xiong C, Zhou M, Lu W, Huang Q, Ku G, Zhao J, Flores LG, Jr, Ni Y, Li C. Small-Animal PET of Tumor Damage Induced by Photothermal Ablation with 64Cu-Bis-DOTA-Hypericin. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:792–799. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.086116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Fonge H, Chitneni SK, Lixin J, Vunckx K, Prinsen K, Nuyts J, Mortelmans L, Bormans GM, Ni Y, Verbruggen A. Necrosis Avidity of 99mTc(CO)3-Labeled Pamoic Acid Derivatives: Synthesis and Preliminary Biological Evaluation in Animal Models of Necrosis. Bioconjugate Chem. 2007;18:1924–1934. doi: 10.1021/bc700236j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Prinsen K, Li J, Vanbilloen H, Vermaelen P, Devos E, Mortelmans L, Bormans GM, Ni Y, Verbruggen A. Development and Evaluation of a 68Ga Labeled Pamoic Acid Derivative for In Vivo Visualization of Necrosis using Positron Emission Tomography. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;18:5274–5281. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.05.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Prinsen K, Jin L, Vunckx K, de Saint-Hubert M, Zhou L, Cleynhens J, Nuyts J, Bormans GM, Ni Y, Verbruggen A. Radiolabeling and Preliminary Biological Evaluation of a 99mTc(CO)3 Labeled 3,3′-(Benzylidene)-Bis-(1H-Indole-2-Carbohydrazide) Derivative as a Potential SPECT Tracer for In Vivo Visualization of Necrosis. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21:502–505. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.10.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Van de Putte M, Ni Y, de Witte PA. Exploration of the Mechanism Underlying the Tumor Necrosis Avidity of Hypericin. Oncol Rep. 2008;19:921–926. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Vandenabeele P, Galluzzi L, Vanden Berghe T, Kroemer G. Molecular Mechanisms of Necroptosis: an Ordered Cellular Explosion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:700–714. doi: 10.1038/nrm2970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Degterev A, Yuan J. Expansion and Evolution of Cell Death Programmes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:378–390. doi: 10.1038/nrm2393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Abrams JM, Alnemri ES, Baehrecke EH, Blagosklonny MV, Dawson TM, Dawson VL, El-Deiry WS, Fulda S, Gottleib E, Green DR, Hengartner MO, Kepp O, Knight RA, Kumar S, Lipton SA, Lu X, Madeo F, Malorni W, Mahlen P, Nuñez G, Peter ME, Piacentini M, Rubinsztein DC, Shi Y, Simon HU, Vandenabeele P, White E, Yuan J, Zhivotovsky B, Melino G, Kroemer G. Molecular Definitions of Cell Death Subroutines: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2012. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19:107–120. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Vanden Berghe T, Vanlangenakker N, Parthoens E, Deckers W, Devos M, Festjens N, Guerin CJ, Brunk UT, Declercq W, Vandenabeele P. Necroptosis, Necrosis and Secondary Necrosis Converge on Similar Cellular Disintegration Features. Cell Death Differ. 2010;17:922–930. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Weissleder R, Tung CH, Mahmood U, Bogdanov A., Jr In Vivo Imaging of Tumors with Protease-Activated Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probes. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:375–378. doi: 10.1038/7933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Jaffer FA, Vinegoni C, John MC, Aikawa E, Gold HK, Finn AV, Ntziachristos V, Libby P, Weissleder R. Real-Time Catheter Molecular Sensing of Inflammation in Proteolytically Active Atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2008;118:1802–1809. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.785881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Bröker LE, Huisman C, Span SW, Rodriguez JA, Kruyt FA, Giaccone G. Cathepsin B Mediates Caspase-Independent Cell Death Induced by Microtubule Stabilizing Agents in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64:27–30. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Degterev A, Huang Z, Boyce M, Li Y, Jagtap P, Mizushima N, Cuny GD, Mitchison TJ, Moskowitz MA, Yuan J. Chemical Inhibitor of Nonapoptotic Cell Death with Therapeutic Potential for Ischemic Brain Injury. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1:112–119. doi: 10.1038/nchembio711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Degterev A, Hitomi J, Germscheid M, Ch’en IL, Korkina O, Teng X, Abbott D, Cuny GD, Yuan C, Wagner G, Hedrick SM, Gerber SA, Lugovskoy A, Yuan J. Identification of RIP1 Kinase as a Specific Cellular Target of Necrostatins. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:313–321. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Kepp O, Galluzzi L, Lipinski M, Yuan J, Kroemer G. Cell Death Assays for Drug Discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:221–236. doi: 10.1038/nrd3373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B. Methods in Mammalian Autophagy Research. Cell. 2010;140:313–326. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Klionsky DJ, Abeliovich H, Agostinis P, Agrawal DK, Aliev G, Askew DS, Baba M, Baehrecke EH, Bahr BA, Ballabio A, Bamber BA, Bassham DC, Bergamini E, Bi X, Biard-Piechaczyk M, et al. Guidelines for the Use and Interpretation of Assays for Monitoring Autophagy in Higher Eukaryotes. Autophagy. 2008;4:151–175. doi: 10.4161/auto.5338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Fazi B, Bursch W, Fimia GM, Nardacci R, Piacentini M, Di San F, Piredda L. Fenretinide Induces Autophagic Cell Death in Caspase-Defective Breast Cancer Cells. Autophagy. 2008;4:435–441. doi: 10.4161/auto.5669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Laane E, Tamm KP, Buentke E, Ito K, Jharaziha P, Oscarsson J, Corcoran M, Björklund AC, Hultenby K, Lundin J, Heyman M, Söderhäll S, Mazur J, Porwit A, Pandolfi PP, Zhivotovsky B, Panaretakis T, Grandér D. Cell Death Induced by Dexamethasone in Lymphoid Leukemia is Mediated Through Initiation of Autophagy. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:1018–1029. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Kroemer G, Levine B. Autophagic Cell Death: the Story of a Misnomer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:1004–1010. doi: 10.1038/nrm2527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Denton D, Nicolson S, Kumar S. Cell Death by Autophagy: Facts and Apparent Artefacts. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19:87–95. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Raucci A, Palumbo R, Bianchi ME. HMGB1: a Signal of Necrosis. Autoimmunity. 2007;40:285–289. doi: 10.1080/08916930701356978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Zitvogel L, Kepp O, Kroemer G. Decoding Cell Death Signals in Inflammation and Immunity. Cell. 2010;140:798–804. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Wang H, Ward MF, Sama AE. Novel HMGB1-Inhibiting Therapeutic Agents for Experimental Sepsis. Stroke. 2009;32:348–357. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181a551bd. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Zhang J, Takahashi HK, Liu K, Wake H, Liu R, Maruo T, Date I, Yoshino T, Ohtsuka A, Mori S, Nishibori M. Anti-High Mobility Group Box-1 Monoclonal Antibody Protects the Blood-Brain Barrier from Ischemia-Induced Disruption in Rats. Stroke. 2011;42:1420–1428. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.598334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Gold LI, Eggleton P, Sweetwyne MT, Van Duyn LB, Greives MR, Naylor SM, Michalak M, Murphy-Ullrich JE. Calreticulin: Non- Endoplasmic Reticulum Functions in Physiology and Disease. FASEB J. 2010;24:665–683. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-145482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Obeid M, Tesenier A, Ghiringhelli F, Fimia GM, Apetoh L, Perfettini JL, Castedo M, Mignot G, Panaretakis T, Casares N, Métivier D, Larochette N, van Endert P, Ciccosanti F, Piacentini M, Zitvogel L, Kromer G. Calreticulin Exposure Dictates the Immunogenicity of Cancer Cell Death. Nat Med. 2007;13:54–61. doi: 10.1038/nm1523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Gardai SJ, McPhillips KA, Frasch SC, Janssen WJ, Starefeldt A, Murphy-Ullrich JE, Bratton DL, Oldenborg PA, Michalak M, Henson PM. Cell-Surface Calreticulin Initiates Clearance of Viable or Apoptotic Cells Through Trans-Activation of LRP on the Phagocyte. Cell. 2005;123:321–334. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Zitvogel L, Kepp O, Senovilla L, Menger L, Chaput N, Kroemer G. Immunogenic Tumor Cell Death for Optimal Anticancer Therapy: the Calreticulin Exposure Pathway. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:3100–3104. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Jung KH, Palik JY, Park J, Quach C, Lee EJ, Choe YS, Lee K-H. Targeting of Calreticulin Exposure for Optical Imaging of Etoposide-Induced Immunogenic Tumor Cell Death. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011;10(Supp 1):B111. [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Garg AD, Nowis D, Golab J, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DV, Agostinis P. Immunogenic Cell Death, DAMPS and Anticancer Therapeutics: an Emerging Amalgamation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1805:53–71. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Shay JW, Roninson IB. Hallmarks of Senescence in Carcinogenesis and Cancer Therapy. Oncogene. 2004;23:2919–2933. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Kuilman T, Michaloglou C, Mooi WJ, Peeper DS. The Essence of Senescence. Genes Dev. 2010;24:2463–2479. doi: 10.1101/gad.1971610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Collado M, Serrano M. Senescence in Tumours: Evidence from Mice and Humans. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:51–57. doi: 10.1038/nrc2772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Debacq-Chainiaux F, Erusalimsky JD, Campisi J, Toussaint O. Protocols to Detect Senescence-Associated Beta-Galactosidase (SA-βgal) Activity, a Biomarker of Senescent Cells in Culture and In Vivo. Nat Prot. 2009;4:1798–1806. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Xue W, Zender L, Miething C, Dickins RA, Hernando E, Krizhanovsky V, Cordon-Cardo C, Lowe SW. Senescence and Tumour Clearance is Triggered by p53 Restoration in Murine Liver Carcinomas. Nature. 2007;445:656–660. doi: 10.1038/nature05529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Tung CH, Zeng Q, Shah K, Kim DE, Schellingerhout D, Weissleder R. In Vivo Imaging of β-Galactosidase Activity using Far Red Fluorescent Switch. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1579–1583. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Liu L, Mason RP. Imaging β-Galactosidase Activity in Human Tumor Xenografts and Transgenic Mice using a Chemiluminescent Substrate. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Van Dort ME, Lee KC, Hamilton CA, Rehemtulla A, Ross BD. Radiosynthesis and Evaluation of 5-[125I]Iodoindol-3-yl-β-D-galactopyranoside ([125I]IBDG) as a β-Galactosidase Imaging Radioligand. Mol Imaging. 2008;7:187–197. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Louie AY, Hüber MM, Ahrens ET, Rothbächer U, Moats R, Jacobs RE, Fraser SE, Meade TJ. In Vivo Visualization of Gene Expression using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:321–325. doi: 10.1038/73780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Koslowsky I, Shahhosseini S, Mirzayans R, Murray D, Mercer J. Evaluation of an 18F-Labeled Oligonucleotide Probe Targeting p21WAF1 Transcriptional Changes in Human Tumor Cells. Oncol Rep. 2011;19:265–274. doi: 10.3727/096504011x13021877989793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Ravichandran KS. Beginnings of a Good Apoptotic Meal: the Find-ME and Eat-Me Signaling Pathways. Immunity. 2011;35:445–455. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Munoz LE, Franz S, Pausch F, Fürnrohr B, Sheriff A, Vogt B, Kern PM, Baum W, Stach C, von Laer D, Brachvogel B, Poschl E, Herrmann M, Gaipl US. The Influence on the Immunomodulatory Effects of Dying and Dead Cells of Annexin V. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81:6–14. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0306166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Frey B, Schildkopf P, Rödel F, Weiss EM, Munoz LE, Herrmann M, Fietkau R, Gaipl US. Annexin A5 Renders Dead Tumor Cells Immunogenic – Implications for Multimodal Cancer Therapies. J Immunotoxicol. 2009;6:209–216. doi: 10.3109/15476910903204058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Huang X, Bennett M, Thorpe PE. A Monoclonal Antibody that Binds Anionic Phospholipids on Tumor Blood Vessels Enhances the Antitumor Effect of Docetaxel on Human Breast Tumors in Mice. Cancer Res. 2005;65:4408–4416. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Beck AW, Luster TA, Miller AF, Holloway SE, Conner CR, Barnett CC, Thorpe PE, Fleming JB, Brekken RA. Combination of a Monoclonal Anti-Phosphatidylserine Antibody with Gemcitabine Strongly Inhibits the Growth and Metastasis of Orthotopic Pancreatic Tumors in Mice. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:2639–2643. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.He J, Yin Y, Luster TA, Watkins L, Thorpe PE. Antiphosphatidylserine Antibody Combined with Irradiation Damages Tumor Blood Vessels and Induces Tumor Immunity in a Rat Model of Gliobastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:6871–6880. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Jinushi M, Nakazaki Y, Dougan M, Carrasco DR, Mihm M, Dranoff G. MFG-E8-Mediated Uptake of Apoptotic Cells by APCs Links the Pro- and Antiinflammatory Activities of GM-CSF. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:1902–1913. doi: 10.1172/JCI30966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Wang K, Na MH, Hoffman AS, Shim G, Han SE, Oh YK, Kwon IC, Kim IS, Lee BH. In Situ Dose Amplification by Apoptosis-Targeted Drug Delivery. J Control Release. 2011;154:214–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.He X, Bonaparte N, Kim S, Kim JH, Aeharya B, Lee JY, Chi L, Lee HJ, Paik YK, Moon PG, Baek MC, Lee EK, Kim IS, Lee BH. Enhanced Delivery of T Cells to Tumor After Chemotherapy using Membrane-Anchored, Apoptosis-Targeted Peptide. J Control Release. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Nardella C, Clohessy JG, Alimonti A, Pandolfi PP. Pro- Senescence Therapy for Cancer Treatment. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:503–511. doi: 10.1038/nrc3057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Ewald JA, Desotelle JA, Wilding GW, Jarrard DF. Therapy-Induced Senescence in Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1536–1546. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Castro RE, Santos MM, Glória PM, Ribeiro CJ, Ferreira DM, Xavier JM, Moreira R, Rodrigues CM. Cell Death Targets and Potential Modulators in Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16:2851–2864. doi: 10.2174/138161210793176563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Ola MS, Nawaz M, Ahsan H. Role of Bcl-2 Family Proteins and Caspases in the Regulation of Apoptosis. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;351:41–58. doi: 10.1007/s11010-010-0709-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Fischer U, Schulze-Osthoff K. Apoptosis-Based Therapies and Drug Targets. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:942–961. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Huang Q, Li F, Liu X, Li W, Shi W, Liu FF, O’Sullivan B, He Z, Peng Y, Tan AC, Zhou L, Shen J, Han G, Wang XJ, Thorburn J, Thorburn A, Jimeno A, Raben D, Bedford JS, Li CY. Caspase 3-Mediated Stimulation of Tumor Cell Repopulation During Cancer Radiotherapy. Nat Med. 2011;17:860–866. doi: 10.1038/nm.2385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Becattini B, Sareth S, Zhai D, Crowell KJ, Leone M, Reed JC, Pellecchia M. Targeting Apoptosis via Chemical Design: Inhibition of Bid-Induced Cell Death by Small Organic Molecules. Chem Biol. 2004;11:1107–1117. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Hotchkiss RS, McConnell KW, Bullok K, Davis CG, Chang KC, Schwulst SJ, Dunne JC, Dietz GPH, Bähr M, McDunn JE, Karl IE, Wagner TH, Cobb JP, Coopersmith CM, Piwnica-Worms D. TAT-BH4 and TAT-Bcl-xL Peptides Protect against Sepsis-Induced Lymphocyte Apoptosis in Vivo. J Immunol. 2006;176:5471–5477. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.9.5471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Kilic E, Dietz GPH, Hermann DM, Bähr M. Intravenous TAT-Bcl- xL is Protective After Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Mice. Ann Neurol. 2002;52:617–622. doi: 10.1002/ana.10356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.McDunn JE, Muenzer JT, Dunne B, Zhou A, Yuan K, Hoekzema A, Hilliard C, Chang KC, Davis CG, McDonough J, Hunt C, Grigsby P, Piwnica-Worms D, Hotchkiss RS. An Anti-Apoptotic Peptide Improves Survival in Lethal Total Body Irradiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;355:501–507. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.03.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.You Z, Savitz SI, Yang J, Degterev A, Yuan J, Cuny GD, Moskowitz, Whalen MJ. Necrostatin-1 Reduced Histopathology and Improves Functional Outcome after Controlled Cortical Impact in Mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28:1564–1573. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Northington FJ, Cavez-Valdez R, Graham EM, Razdan S, Gauda EB, Martin LJ. Necrostatin Decreases Oxidative Damage, Inflammation, and Injury after Neonatal HI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011;31:178–189. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Zhu S, Zhang Y, Bai G, Li H. Necrostatin-1 Ameliorates Symptoms in R6/2 Transgenic Mouse Model of Huntington’s Disease. Cell Death Dis. 2011;2:e115. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2010.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Weber WA. Assessing Tumor Response to Therapy. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1S–10S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:122S–150S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Blankenberg FG. Apoptosis Imaging: Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry. Anti-Cancer Agent Med Chem. 2009;9:944–951. doi: 10.2174/187152009789377727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES