Abstract
Background
Forage plant breeding is under increasing pressure to deliver new cultivars with improved yield, quality and persistence to the pastoral industry. New innovations in DNA sequencing technologies mean that quantitative trait loci analysis and marker-assisted selection approaches are becoming faster and cheaper, and are increasingly used in the breeding process with the aim to speed it up and improve its precision. High-throughput phenotyping is currently a major bottle neck and emerging technologies such as metabolomics are being developed to bridge the gap between genotype and phenotype; metabolomics studies on forages are reviewed in this article.
Scope
Major challenges for pasture production arise from the reduced availability of resources, mainly water, nitrogen and phosphorus, and metabolomics studies on metabolic responses to these abiotic stresses in Lolium perenne and Lotus species will be discussed here. Many forage plants can be associated with symbiotic microorganisms such as legumes with nitrogen fixing rhizobia, grasses and legumes with phosphorus-solubilizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and cool temperate grasses with fungal anti-herbivorous alkaloid-producing Neotyphodium endophytes and metabolomics studies have shown that these associations can significantly affect the metabolic composition of forage plants. The combination of genetics and metabolomics, also known as genetical metabolomics can be a powerful tool to identify genetic regions related to specific metabolites or metabolic profiles, but this approach has not been widely adopted for forages yet, and we argue here that more studies are needed to improve our chances of success in forage breeding.
Conclusions
Metabolomics combined with other ‘-omics’ technologies and genome sequencing can be invaluable tools for large-scale geno- and phenotyping of breeding populations, although the implementation of these approaches in forage breeding programmes still lags behind. The majority of studies using metabolomics approaches have been performed with model species or cereals and findings from these studies are not easily translated to forage species. To be most effective these approaches should be accompanied by whole-plant physiology and proof of concept (modelling) studies. Wider considerations of possible consequences of novel traits on the fitness of new cultivars and symbiotic associations need also to be taken into account.
Keywords: Metabolomics; forage plants; Lolium perenne; drought stress, nutrient stress; Neotyphodium spp. endophytes; Medicago sativa; Lotus spp.; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; rhizobia; metabolic profiling; genetical metabolomics
INTRODUCTION
Major forage plants of grazed pastures are the temperate grasses Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass) and L. arundinaceum (tall fescue), and the legumes Trifolium repens (white clover) and Medicago sativa (lucerne, alfalfa). To increase the success of pasture-based animal production systems, forage breeding has focused on traits such as increased pasture production, tolerance and persistence under biotic and abiotic stress, and on improved forage quality (Humphreys et al., 2006; Parsons et al., 2011a). Reduced opportunities to increase forage production solely through on-farm management such as fertilization or defoliation and feed allocation (Clark et al., 2007), as well as pressures to reduce negative environmental impacts (Abberton et al., 2008) require the development of new cultivars with superior agronomic traits as rapidly as possible.
Traditional plant breeding is based on phenotypic selection and subsequent progeny testing commonly followed by re-selection, which can be a very slow process and requires often time-consuming and costly phenotyping. To speed up the process and to make it more precise quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis to identify genetic markers which are used for marker-assisted selection (MAS) is being developed as a new tool for forage breeding (Zhang et al., 2006; Mouradov, 2010), but so far these genotypic markers have been mainly correlated to readily observable phenotypes, e.g. seed yield. Many desired traits are directly linked to specific metabolites, e.g. high sugar grasses to fructans (Turner et al., 2006), or insect resistance to certain secondary metabolites (Clay and Schardl, 2002); targeted analysis of these metabolite classes can be sufficient for selection and QTL analysis, although these methods are usually slow and not amenable for screening of large populations. However, the link to a desired phenotype can also be more complex, e.g. in the case of plant growth or drought tolerance where a complex profile of metabolites represents a chemotype related to the desired characteristics (Tuberosa and Salvi, 2006; Meyer et al., 2007). To unravel these profiles and to screen large numbers of plant genotypes and populations, metabolomics approaches have been developed to analyse a wide range of metabolite classes simultaneously and in a high-throughput and untargeted manner (Sumner et al., 2003; Hall, 2006; Fernie and Schauer, 2008; Langridge and Fleury, 2011). Other ‘-omics’ technologies such as genomics, transcriptomics or proteomics analyse only one type of chemical compounds, i.e. DNA, RNA or proteins, and require generally only a small number of analytical platforms. Metabolomics, on the other hand, is faced with a multitude of chemical structures with physicochemical properties ranging from highly hydrophilic (e.g. sugars) to hydrophobic (e.g. fatty acids), as well as a large dynamic range from molar to nanomolar (e.g. some alkaloids) to even lower (e.g. some phytohormones) concentrations. Currently no technology is available which gives a truly ‘holistic’ view of the metabolome, and a combination of several extraction, separation and detection techniques is required to give an overview of most metabolites present in a sample. The main instrumentation used is based on mass spectrometry (MS) coupled to gas chromatography (GC) and/or liquid chromatography (LC), but other technologies such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or capillary electrophoresis coupled to MS are also used. All of these technologies produce very data-rich outputs and require extensive processing (e.g. noise removal, peak alignment, peak picking and deconvolution, peak identification) and mining (e.g. multivariate statistics, machine learning, network analysis) techniques to deliver meaningful information which needs to be interpreted and utilized in the plant breeding process. It is beyond the scope of this review to discuss these techniques in detail and we refer to Hall (2011) and references therein for further reading.
Through providing a broad analysis of a plant's chemical composition, metabolomics approaches can provide a significant opportunity for plant breeders to assess for traits which have previously been considered too difficult or too expensive to include in breeding programmes. Such traits have required the development of specific targeted analyses or the application of a significant amount of effort by skilled labour, which would provide a barrier to their routine assessment. In addition, as these approaches are implemented more broadly and integrated with other high-throughput genomic technologies, they will enable plant breeders to assess several of these characteristics concurrently. However, setting up the appropriate instrumentation and bioinformatics infrastructure still requires large financial inputs often beyond the means of small institutes or breeding companies especially in the area of forages. The majority of metabolomics studies so far have therefore focused on the analysis of model plant species by academic institutions to develop the technologies, or cereal crop and vegetable species with larger financial margins for the breeding industry. For examples of successful implementation of metabolomics, together with other molecular breeding tools in potato, tomato, rice and other fruits and cereals, we refer here to Stewart et al. (2011) and references therein. In comparison, the use of metabolomics for forage species and its implementation in forage breeding programmes still lags behind and we will review here those few studies which have analysed the metabolome (or parts of it) in forages.
METABOLOMICS ANALYSIS OF FORAGE PLANT RESPONSES TO ABIOTIC STRESS
Major challenges for pasture production arise from the reduced availability of three resources, i.e. water, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). Plants have developed an array of adaptation mechanisms to cope with low or fluctuating availability of these resources, most of which result in reduced vegetative growth. The majority of detailed studies of molecular and metabolic responses to resource limitation has been performed with either model (mainly Arabidopsis thaliana) or cereal crop species with a major focus for the latter on seed yield. Intensive animal production on pastures, however, requires high vegetative plant yield, and much more research on how forage plants respond to low resource supply and how these responses might be manipulated is needed.
Metabolic responses to osmotic stress
Extended periods of drought pose a serious challenge to agricultural production systems including pastures. Global climate change has been predicted to increase the variance of climatic parameters, which may lead to unpredictable and more intense events of drought (Gornall et al., 2010), and many breeding programmes are directed to develop forage and crop cultivars which survive severe drought better and/or continue to be high yielding under moderate drought conditions (Wilkins and Humphreys, 2003; Humphreys et al., 2006). Improved survival and/or growth characteristics under drought can be achieved by plants through a multitude of strategies (Orcutt and Nilsen, 2000; Chaves et al., 2003) each involving different sets of traits (Ludlow and Muchow, 1990; Richards, 1996, 2006; Collins et al., 2008). Furthermore trade-offs between increased drought adaptation and productivity are to be expected, and these will depend on how well cultivars with changed strategies cope with a variety of climate scenarios (Tardieu, 2005; Sambatti and Caylor, 2007). To be successful in overcoming at least some of these complex problems requires a much better understanding of plant responses to drought (and other abiotic stresses) on the molecular level, but only a very few studies have been performed on forages compared with crops (Zhang et al., 2006). For example, metabolic and transcript profiling of Lolium perenne exposed to PEG-induced water stress compared responses of a susceptible genotype from the cultivar ‘Cashel’ to a genotype from an accession classified as ‘drought tolerant’ (Foito et al., 2009). The main outcome of that study was that a large number of metabolites responded to water stress with amino acids, fatty acids and phytosterols generally decreasing, while sugars and organic acids increased. Major differences between the two genotypes were related to much higher increases in quinic and shikimic acid, phytosterols, raffinose and trehalose in the drought-tolerant accession. This general trend of increases in sugars and organic acids and decreases in amino acids was also found in a comparative metabolomics study of model and cultivated Lotus species subjected to either severe short-term or to moderate long-term drought (Sanchez et al., 2011b).
Quinic and shikimic acids are precursors for phenylpropanoids such as flavonols, and studies on Trifolium repens subjected to abiotic stresses such as UV irradiation (Hofmann et al., 2001), drought (Hofmann et al., 2003) and cold (Rasmussen et al., 2006; Rasmussen, 2009) showed a strong increase of flavonols, particularly quercetin conjugates. Cultivars and ecotypes of T. repens with constitutive high levels of flavonols and anthocyanins had also been shown to be more UV and drought tolerant (Hofmann et al., 2001, 2003), indicating that high levels of phenylpropanoid pathway metabolites might protect plants from abiotic stress (Dixon and Paiva, 1995). However, it has also been shown that there is no simple correlation between levels of stress-related metabolites and stress tolerance (Ashraf and Foolad, 2007; Sanchez et al., 2011), and selection for high-flavonoid clovers has not resulted in more stress-tolerant cultivars so far. Higher levels of some compatible solutes (e.g. proline, glycine betaine), usually interpreted as an indication of increased stress tolerance are in fact observed in some drought-sensitive genotypes of barley and potato (Chen et al., 2007; Vazquez-Robinet et al., 2008; Widodo et al., 2009). Only one-quarter to one-third of metabolite responses were shared between the Lotus model and cultivated species, demonstrating that findings from studies with model species cannot be simply translated to cultivated species (Sanchez et al., 2011b).
Metabolic responses to osmotic stresses are often related to common changes in carbon availability, usage and growth (Hummel et al., 2010), but a comparison of metabolic responses to drought and salt stress in Lotus species showed that only one-third to one-half of metabolic responses were conserved, while some metabolites, particularly organic acids, responded in the opposite direction, i.e. were increased under drought but decreased under salt stress (Sanchez et al., 2011, 2012). Clearly, more research, particularly on forage cultivars, is needed to identify robust metabolic traits and pathways conferring drought tolerance to improve chances of success of current breeding efforts, and this research should be integrated with other -omics data, whole plant physiology and genetics (Cattivelli et al., 2008; Salekdeh et al., 2009; Roy et al., 2011).
Metabolic responses to nutrients
Plants require large amounts of nitrogen for optimal photosynthesis and vegetative growth, and green tissues of forage grasses in highly N-fertilized pastures contain up to 4·5 % total N (Parsons et al., 1991). N is taken up as ammonium or nitrate from soils, with nitrate being the major form (Crawford and Glass, 1998). Nitrate acts as a signal inducing a range of metabolic enzymes involved in carbon and amino acid metabolism, while it reduces flavonoid biosynthesis (Lam et al., 1996; Sakakibara et al., 2006; Krouk et al., 2010). A comprehensive study comparing the metabolic composition of L. perenne plants grown at high-N versus moderately low-N supply, resulting in 4 % versus 3 % total N content in blades, showed significant differences in a large number of metabolites (Rasmussen et al., 2007, 2008a). As expected, strong effects were seen for nitrogenous compounds of which the majority were much higher at high-N supply. However, major amino acids (e.g. glutamine and aspartate), which represented 85 % of the total free amino acids, were much more affected than minor amino acids, which was in accordance with other studies (Noctor et al., 2002). Nitrate assimilation is strongly linked with photosynthesis and carbon metabolism (Stitt et al., 2002; Smith and Stitt, 2007) and was reflected by a shift from carbohydrate to organic acid and lipid biosynthesis (Rasmussen et al., 2008a). This study also tested the effects and interactions of resource supply and infection of Lolium perenne with an endophytic Neotyphodium lolii fungus, which produces alkaloids protecting its host from insect herbivory, and one of the major findings was that high-N supply resulted in reduced accumulation of alkaloids produced by this fungus, which will be discussed in the section ‘Ryegrass–endophyte associations’.
Phosphorus is the second most important mineral nutrient essential for plant growth and low-P availability severely limits crop and pasture growth (Vance et al., 2003). P fertilization is becoming increasingly expensive as natural resources of phosphate rock are dwindling (Gilbert, 2009; Vance, 2001). Phosphate deprivation results in a complex re-programming of metabolism, and plants have evolved four major adaptation strategies involving changes in root morphology, improved P uptake, increased P recycling and improved P economy (Vance et al., 2003; Morcuende et al., 2007; Müller et al., 2007; Nilsson et al., 2010). A transcriptomic and metabolic profiling study on early response mechanisms of L. perenne to P starvation revealed an enhanced uptake of sulfur and mobilization of glycerol 3-phosphate, which is indicative of a remodelling of membranes from phosphor lipids (to release P) to sulfolipids (Byrne et al., 2011) as was seen in A. thaliana as well (Misson et al., 2005). Other effects were a genotype-specific reduction of sugars, amino acids, fatty acids and organic acids in leaves while sugars and some fatty acids were increased, indicating effects on photosynthesis (Hammond and White, 2008; Byrne et al., 2011). Improved efficiency of P use can be achieved by activating glycolytic bypasses (Theodorou and Plaxton, 1993) and Byrne et al. (2011) presented evidence that this strategy can be employed by L. perenne. A high level of transcripts coding for cellulose synthases accompanied with reduced expression of xylanases was interpreted by the authors as indicative of remodelling of cell walls; however, it is unclear how P deficiency and cell wall biosynthesis are interconnected (Byrne et al., 2011).
Plants have evolved additional strategies to cope with a low nutrient supply, i.e. legumes can form symbiotic associations with dinitrogen-fixing rhizobial bacteria, while both grasses and legumes can also form associations with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) to improve P solubilization and uptake. Metabolomics studies of these associations will be reviewed in the following sections.
METABOLOMICS ANALYSIS OF SYMBIOTIC FORAGE PLANT ASSOCIATIONS
Like many other plants, forages form a wide variety of associations with endosymbiotic heterotrophic microbes. One of the most important is the association of legumes such as T. repens (white clover) and M. sativa (alfalfa, lucerne) with rhizobia as these provide pastures with additional nitrogen through fixation of atmospheric dinitrogen (N2) gas (Graham and Vance 2000, 2003). Common to both forage grasses and legumes are associations with AMF which facilitate the solubilization and utilization of immobilized soil phosphorus (Read and Perez-Moreno, 2003; Cappellazzo et al., 2008; Smith and Read, 2008). A symbiotic association specific to cool-temperate grasses such as L. perenne and L. arundinaceum is the infection with fungal Neotyphodium/Epichloë spp. endophytes which provide their host plants with anti-herbivorous alkaloids (Leuchtmann, 1992; Clay and Schardl, 2002; Christensen et al., 2008). In all cases the heterotrophic microorganisms depend on carbon and energy provided by their autotrophic host plants. How a mutualistic co-operation (both partners benefit) between the symbiotic partners is maintained over the course of evolution and especially how the partners prevent each other from ‘cheating’ (only one partner benefits) is still debated, but control of metabolite/nutrient exchange between the partners seems to play an important role (Kiers and Denison, 2008; Ryan et al., 2008; Draper et al., 2011). Metabolomics approaches have been used to study the effects of these associations on metabolic composition of the whole symbiotum or specialized cell structures like arbuscules and nodules, and will be discussed in the following section.
Associations of forage legumes with rhizobia
Mineral soil nitrogen is a major limiting factor for pasture-based animal production requiring the application of nitrogen fertilizers to intensive production systems. Global market prizes for these fertilizers have steadily increased over the past decades due to high energy consumption in the production process, and environmental impacts due to nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions from pastures have renewed an interest in biological nitrogen fixation by legumes. Major forage legumes in pastoral systems are Trifolium and Lotus species, and alfalfa (lucerne) which are either grown in mixed swards with forage grasses for grazing or as monocultures for hay and silage production. Rhizobial bacteria infect legume roots and form nodular structures which are able to fix otherwise inaccessible atmospheric N2. The establishment of successful nodulation and active N-fixation depends on a complex signalling pathway which involves metabolite (e.g. isoflavonoids, phytohormones, lectins) -based communication between the two partners (Matamoros et al., 2006; Gibson et al., 2008; Oldroyd and Downie, 2008; Ding and Oldroyd, 2009).
Primary metabolism undergoes major changes during the transition from nodule-free root tissues to functional nodules and it has been proposed that malate is the major source for carbon and energy for nodule-inhabiting bacteroids (Vance et al., 1994; Schulze, 2004). An induction of genes related to sucrose degradation, glycolysis, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylation and malate synthesis increasing malate production in the host plant has been demonstrated by transcriptomic analyses (Hohnjec et al., 1999; Colebatch et al., 2002, 2004; Kouchi et al., 2004; Manthey et al., 2004; Barsch et al., 2006). Only a few studies have used metabolic profiling or metabolomics to analyse these metabolic changes in forage plants or their close relatives, and these have focused on nodules of Mesorhizobium loti-infected L. japonicus (Colebatch et al., 2004; Desbrosses et al., 2005) and Sinorhizobium meliloti-infected M. sativa (Barsch et al., 2006) using mainly GC–MS. A recent study of soybean root hairs using GC–MS and ultra-performance LC–quadrupole time-of-flight–MS identified a total of 2610 metabolites of which 166 were significantly regulated at very early stages of infection with Bradyrhizobium japonicum (Brechenmacher et al., 2010). In support of models based on transcriptome analyses these studies revealed an increase in some sugars, glycolytic and citric acid cycle pathway intermediates, malate, polyols, polyamines and most amino acids, especially asparagine and glutamine, in nodules. Precursors for phenylpropanoid-derived plant defence and signalling compounds such as shikimate and quinate as well as (iso)flavonoids were also reported. Interestingly, biosynthesis of the branched-chain amino acids leucine, isoleucine and valine is strongly down-regulated in nodules (Barnett et al., 2004; Capela et al., 2006; Pessi et al., 2007), and it was shown that these amino acids need to be supplied to the bacteroids by the host plant, indicating a crucial mechanism for regulatory control of nodule metabolism by the host (Prell et al., 2009).
Overall, these metabolic changes are indicators of stress and it has been suggested that nodules experience two major stress conditions, i.e. hypoxia and phosphorous limitation (Colebatch et al., 2004). Hypoxia could be a consequence of the low oxygen concentrations in nodules required for nitrogenase activity (Batut and Boistard, 1994; Fischer, 1996). P deficiency, on the other hand, seems to be caused by bacteroids acting as a significant P sink (Hernández et al., 2009), which might be a critical factor for the relatively high P requirements of legumes compared with grasses in pastoral systems.
Associations of forage plants with AMF
Phosphorus is the second major limiting factor for productivity in pastoral systems and, due to dwindling reserves and increasing costs of natural P fertilizers, solutions are needed to increase available soil P. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (from the Greek words for ‘fungus’ and ‘root’) fungi (AMF) play a critical role in the acquisition of inorganic phosphorus from insoluble P sources in soils and transfer to their hosts (Read and Perez-Moreno, 2003; Cappellazzo et al., 2008; Smith and Read, 2008). Like rhizobial bacteria, AMF are also heterotrophic and completely dependent on carbon and energy supply by the host. Up to 20 % of fixed carbon can be transferred to AMF, contributing considerably to the carbon sequestration capacity of soils (Bago et al., 2000; Zhu and Miller, 2003).
Successful infection and arbuscule formation requires a complex re-programming of root cells which is strikingly similar to that seen in nodule formation (Akiyama and Hayashi, 2006; Besserer et al., 2006; Oldroyd et al., 2009; Soto et al., 2010; Draper et al., 2011; Gaude et al., 2012). Metabolomics studies of AMF associations are very rare and most of the current knowledge of metabolite exchange and metabolism is based on detailed studies employing labelled isotopes and NMR spectroscopy (Bago et al., 2000, 2001; Pfeffer et al., 2001). In the developed symbiosis, carbon is translocated as hexoses to the arbuscules and intraradical fungal hyphae and subsequently metabolized to trehalose, glycogen and lipids. Lipids are translocated to the extraradical hyphae where they are used for fungal growth and maintenance. Extraradical hyphae can take up P from the soil in the form of inorganic phosphate and translocate it as polyphosphate to the intraradical hyphae and arbuscules, and eventually to plant cells (Shachar-Hill et al., 1995; Javot et al., 2007). Metabolic profiling of Glomus intraradices-infected M. truncatula (a model legume closely related to M. sativa) roots revealed levels of some amino acids, fatty acids, isoflavonoids and tyrosol in arbuscular relative to uninfected root tissue (Schliemann et al., 2008). This study also identified the fungal-specific metabolites trehalose, Δ11-unsaturated fatty acids, sterols and apocarotenoids. Interestingly, trehalose was also identified as a rhizobium-specific metabolite in the above-mentioned study on B. japonicum-infected root hairs in soybean (Brechenmacher et al., 2010).
Ryegrass–endophyte associations
Cool temperate forage grasses such as L. perenne and L. arundinaceum can also be infected by clavicipitaceous fungal endophytes which reside exclusively in the apoplastic spaces of above-ground plant parts and do not form any kind of specialized symbiotic compartments (Leuchtmann, 1992; Clay and Schardl, 2002; Christensen et al., 2008). These endophytes produce a variety of alkaloids which have anti-herbivorous activities and protect the host plants from grazing mammals, insects and other invertebrates (Bush et al., 1997; Lane et al., 2000; Schardl et al., 2004). Unlike for rhizobia and mycorrhiza, not much is known about signalling processes between endophytes and their hosts, but a role for reactive oxygen species and possibly iron for the regulation of fungal growth in planta has been demonstrated (Tanaka et al., 2006, 2008; Koulman et al., 2012). Transcriptomic analyses of host plant responses to endophyte infection have been hampered by the lack of available genome sequences; however, the genome sequences of several Epichloë strains have recently been made publicly available (http://www.endophyte.uky.edu/). A study using high-throughput mRNA sequencing showed that disruption of a fungal kinase leads to dramatic changes in gene expression profiles associated with proliferative fungal growth, early plant senescence and down-regulation of fungal secondary metabolites, indicating a shift of the nature of the association from mutualistic to pathogenic (Eaton et al., 2010).
Neotyphodium/Epichloë spp. endophytes are completely dependent on micro- and macronutrient supply by their host plants, but very little is known about the mechanisms of exchange of metabolites, and no specific sugar or amino acid transporters have been functionally characterized so far (Draper et al., 2011). Targeted and untargeted metabolomics analyses comparing infected with uninfected plants show a significant decrease in nitrogenous compounds (e.g. nitrate, asparagine, proline, proteins) and some fibre components with a concomitant increase in soluble carbohydrates and organic acids such as malate, quinate, shikimate and phenylpropanoids (Cao et al., 2008; Rasmussen et al., 2008a, 2009a). The effects on sugars, specific organic acids and stress-related metabolites seems to be a common feature of all three symbiotic associations discussed here, and are in fact common to most biotrophic, including pathogenic interactions (Draper et al., 2011).
Some of the alkaloids produced by grass endophytes such as lolitrems and ergovaline are toxic to grazing livestock (Gallagher et al., 1984; Lyons et al., 1986; Strickland et al., 1996), and a range of fungal genes and gene clusters responsible for alkaloid biosynthesis have been identified (Spiering et al., 2002; Tanaka et al., 2005; Young et al., 2006; Fleetwood et al., 2007). Major efforts are under way to identify novel endophytic strains with beneficial metabolic profiles, and high-throughput analytic methods employing direct infusion MS proved to be useful for rapid screening of large numbers of infected seeds and plants (Koulman et al., 2007) and identified a previously unknown class of cyclic oligopeptides produced by endophytes (Cao et al., 2008). Moreover, a study testing the effects of nitrogen supply, high-sugar ryegrass cultivars and strains of endophytes differing in their alkaloid profile revealed that several additional metabolites apart from alkaloids and particular combinations of these were relevant for insect responses to infected plants (Rasmussen et al., 2008b). The above studies also demonstrated that endophyte alkaloid production and endophyte concentrations depended strongly on the ryegrass cultivar (Rasmussen et al., 2007, 2008a; Liu et al., 2011), supporting the findings that the host-plant genotype regulates fungal growth (Easton et al., 2002), and a genetical metabolomics study described in the following section identified several QTL in the ryegrass genome relevant to these traits (Koulman et al., 2009).
GENETICAL METABOLOMICS AND FORAGE BREEDING
The combination of genetics and metabolomics, also known as genetical metabolomics has been successfully used in model and crop species to identify genetic regions related to specific metabolites or metabolic profiles (for reviews, see Keurentjes et al., 2006; Keurentjes, 2009; Kliebenstein, 2009; Fernie and Klee, 2011). An untargeted metabolomics and QTL analysis of 2000 mass peaks detected in a recombinant inbred line of Arabidopsis thaliana allowed the reconstruction of the glucosinolate pathway, confirmed that at least two QTL contribute to variation in aliphatic glucosinolates, and uncovered new biosynthetic steps related to flavonol glycosides (Keurentjes et al., 2006). Other studies of this type identified QTL for flavour volatile emissions in tomato (Schauer et al., 2006; Tieman et al., 2006) and flavonols in poplar (Morreel et al., 2006).
Only a very few studies have been published on genetical metabolomics in forage plants and we will discuss two examples here. A targeted metabolic profiling approach has been used to identify QTL related to high sugar content in blades of L. perenne (Turner et al., 2006). Grasses with higher sugar levels in blades have been bred to increase energy supply to the rumen microorganisms, decreasing N losses from rumen protein degradation and increasing N supplied to the ruminant, thereby reducing N losses in urine and nitrous oxide emissions from pastures (Miller et al., 2001; Wilkins and Lovatt, 2003; Edwards et al., 2007; Parsons et al., 2011a, b). Temperate grasses accumulate water-soluble fructans, i.e. polymeric chains of fructose attached to a core molecule of sucrose, which are an alternative reserve carbohydrate to starch (Pavis et al., 2001). Biosynthesis and accumulation of fructans show marked seasonal variation (Pollock and Jones, 1979), and mobilization of fructans plays an important role for re-growth after defoliation (Morvand-Bertrand et al., 2001). Fructan metabolism is very complex and considerable interactions of the expression of the high sugar trait in high-sugar grass cultivars with temperature, duration of re-growth after defoliation, nutrient supply, flowering and association with symbiotic microorganisms has been shown (Pollock and Cairns, 1991; Parsons et al., 2004; Rasmussen et al., 2007, 2009b; Liu et al., 2011). Turner et al. (2006) mapped fructan, sucrose, glucose and fructose contents in L. perenne leaves and tiller bases using an F2 mapping family from a high water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) × low WSC cross in two seasons (spring and autumn) over 4 years. Despite high variability of the traits and considerable environmental variation, significant genetic effects were detected and the broad-sense heritability was moderate to high. The metabolic QTL (mQTL) explained between 8 % and 59 % of the total phenotypic variation with the largest effects for fructan and total WSC QTL near the top of chromosome 6. However, a large proportion of the total phenotypic variation was unexplained by QTL, and many QTL were identified in only 1 year probably reflecting the strong impact of environmental conditions on the expression of the trait (Kamoshita et al., 2002). A subsequent study analysing relationships between growth and drought-stress QTL with fructan QTL (Turner et al., 2008) showed that correlation between growth and fructan content was low to negative suggesting that growth is likely to be related to a not very well-defined inherent plant growth capacity rather than to carbohydrate storage. Recently developed LC–MS-based methods for the rapid analysis of polymeric fructans up to DP 100 (degree of polymerization) revealed that high sugar grasses mainly differed in large polymeric fructans (Harrison et al., 2009, 2011, 2012). These high-DP fructans are difficult to separate and quantify with the analytical methods commonly used for fructan analysis and MS analysis might reveal additional and larger QTL for high sugar grasses.
An untargeted direct infusion MS/MS analysis of metabolites in clonal replicates of 200 genotypes of an endophyte-infected L. perenne F1 mapping population from a pair cross between two heterozygous genotypes in two consecutive years identified 22 ions with one or more reproducible QTL across the 2 years (Koulman et al., 2009). QTL were detected for the fungal alkaloid peramine and for an unknown fungal cyclic oligopeptide identified in a previous study (Cao et al., 2008), clearly showing that fungal metabolite production is at least partially regulated by the host genome and suggesting that marker-assisted selection might be an option for breeding of endophyte–host associations with a particular metabolic make-up. A large number of ions with QTL were unknowns and would need more targeted LC-MS/MS analytical methods and purification for compound identification. Two of the unknowns were subsequently isolated and shown to be the plant pyrrolizidine alkaloids thesinine-rhamnoside and a thesinine-rhamnoside-hexoside which had not been described previously in Poaceae (Koulman et al., 2008). Some pyrrolizidine alkaloids have been associated with insect-deterring activities (Frölich et al., 2006), and the finding that thesinine accumulated in most of the ryegrass cultivars tested lead the authors to speculate that breeders have inadvertently bred for this metabolic trait (Koulman et al., 2008). This clearly shows that untargeted metabolomics is very powerful in detecting unknown metabolic consequences of breeding.
Another promising area for implementing metabolomics into forage breeding is the development of MS-based analysis of grass-fibre composition. Low digestibility (or degradation rate) of grass cell walls can negatively affect feed intake and fibre chemical composition has been targeted in some forage breeding programmes (Casler et al., 2008). The measurement of in sacco or in vivo degradation rates of plant material is expensive and not useful for screening individual plants in a breeding programme. Analysis of plant cell-wall composition and the correlation of concentrations of extracted wall compounds such as etherified hydroxycinnamic acids with degradation rates has therefore been proposed as an alternative approach (Lam et al., 2003). However, cell walls in grasses are a complex of insoluble polyphenolic lignin tightly linked to hemicellulose and cellulose by esterified and etherified hydroxycinnamic acids. Current extraction and detection methods for these fibres are difficult to use, time-consuming and costly, which has hampered the development of new cultivars with improved digestibility characteristics. Recently, a more mild extraction method with subsequent chromatographic separation of larger complexes of lignin, polysaccharides and hydroxycinnamic acids and detection by MS has been described (Faville et al., 2010). This method is amenable to high-throughput analysis of large sample sets, and relatively high correlation (up to 0·63) with in sacco degradation rates was seen for some of the unidentified cell-wall polymers. These compounds also showed considerable genotypic variation and might be very useful as metabolic markers in future forage breeding programmes. A study of seasonal changes in metabolic composition of 21 grass and legume cultivars using NMR also revealed high correlation of sugar concentrations, fibres and in vitro organic matter digestibility with the NMR fingerprints, mainly due to differences in spectral intensities of malic acid, choline and glucose (Bertram et al., 2010). These studies highlight that metabolomics-based approaches deliver high-throughput detection and selection methods for forage genotypes with improved feed quality and can help overcome some of the current limitations of forage breeding programmes.
CONCLUSIONS
Meeting current and future demands of the pastoral industry for new forage cultivars with superior agronomic characteristics to increase animal production and reduce environmental impacts will be a challenge for plant breeders. New technologies such as genome sequencing, transcriptomics and metabolomics can be very powerful tools for large-scale geno- and phenotyping, and for improving our understanding of complex traits and our ability to manipulate them. Particularly the combination of genetics and metabolomics technologies is a very promising, albeit under-developed technique for forage breeding. The plant metabolome is very complex and the development of metabolomics approaches is still in its early stages and requires currently expensive analytical instrumentation and extensive bioinformatics infrastructure. This has resulted in slow uptake of these technologies by forage breeders and a lack of examples of successful implementation in forage breeding programmes so far.
Much of the knowledge of the traits discussed in this review comes from studies on model species or cultivated cereals. These plants are most often inbreeding annuals with flowering and seed setting as a major strategy for survival of the population. Forage species, on the other hand, are mostly outbreeding perennials which have evolved long-term strategies for survival and propagation of vegetative material often involving extended phenotypes, i.e. associations with symbiotic microorganisms. Furthermore, the harvested component of forage plants in grazed pastures is vegetative photosynthetically active tissue, the only source of new carbon for plant growth and so pasture production. Hence, yield is a trade-off between removing leaves to feed grazing animals while sustaining enough leaf material to photosynthesize, and improvements in ‘yield’ are very difficult to achieve and sustain for grazed forage plants. These special features have limited the success of translational approaches from model species and more research on major forage species is urgently needed to assist forage breeding in overcoming current limitations of pasture-based production systems. To be most effective, these techniques need to be accompanied by whole-plant physiology, proof of concept (modelling) studies related to the efficacy of specific traits, and wider considerations of possible consequences of new traits, particularly on fitness of new populations.
LITERATURE CITED
- Abberton MT, Marshall AH, Humphreys MW, Macduff JH, Collins RP, Marley CL. Genetic improvement of forage species to reduce the environmental impact of temperate livestock grazing systems. Advances in Agronomy. 2008;98:311–355. [Google Scholar]
- Akiyama K, Hayashi H. Strigolactones: chemical signals for fungal symbionts and parasitic weeds in plant roots. Annals of Botany. 2006;97:925–931. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ashraf M, Foolad MR. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007;59:206–216. [Google Scholar]
- Bago B, Pfeffer PE, Schachar-Hill Y. Carbon metabolism and transport in arbuscular mycorrhizas. Plant Physiology. 2000;124:949–957. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.3.949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bago B, Pfeffer PE, Schachar-Hill Y. Could the urea cycle be translocating nitrogen in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis? New Phytologist. 2001;149:4–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00016.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnett MJ, Toman CJ, Fisher RF, Long SR. A dual-genome symbiosis chip for coordinate study of signal exchange and development in a prokaryote–host interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2004;101:16636–16641. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407269101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barsch A, Tellström V, Patschkowski T, Küster H, Niehaus K. Metabolite profiles of nodulated alfalfa plants indicate that distinct stages of nodule organogenesis are accompanied by global physiological adaptations. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions. 2006;19:998–1013. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Batut J, Boistard P. Oxygen control in rhizobium. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Journal of Microbiology and Serology. 1994;66:129–150. doi: 10.1007/BF00871636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bertram HC, Weisbjerg MR, Jensen CS, et al. Seasonal changes in the metabolic fingerprint of 21 grass and legume cultivars studied by nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2010;58:4336–4341. doi: 10.1021/jf904321p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Besserer A, Puech-Pagés V, Kiefer P, et al. Strigolactones stimulate arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by activating mitochondria. PLoS Biology. 2006;4:e226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040226 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brechenmacher L, Lei Z, Libault M, et al. Soybean metabolites regulated in root hairs in response to the symbiotic bacterium Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Plant Physiology. 2010;153:1808–1822. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.157800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bush LP, Wilkinson HH, Schardl CL. Bioprotective alkaloids of grass–fungal endophyte symbioses. Plant Physiology. 1997;114:1–7. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Byrne SL, Foito A, Hedley PE, Morris JA, Stewart D, Barth S. Early response mechanisms of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) to phosphorus deficiency. Annals of Botany. 2011;107:243–254. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Capela D, Filipe C, Bobik C, Batut J, Bruand C. Sinorhizobium meliloti differentiation during symbiosis with alfalfa: a transcriptome dissection. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions. 2006;19:363–372. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cappellazzo G, Lanfranco L, Fitz M, Wipf D, Bonfante P. Characterization of an amino acid permease from the endomycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Plant Physiology. 2008;147:429–437. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.117820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao M, Koulman A, Johnson LJ, Lane GA, Rasmussen S. Advanced data-mining strategies for the analysis of direct-infusion ion trap mass spectrometry data from the association of perennial ryegrass with its endophytic fungus, Neotyphodium lolii. Plant Physiology. 2008;146:1501–1514. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.112458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Casler MD, Jung HG, Coblentz WK. Clonal selection for lignin and etherified ferulates in three perennial grasses. Crop Science. 2008;48:424–433. [Google Scholar]
- Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck F-W, et al. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research. 2008;105:1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS. Understanding plant responses to drought – from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology. 2003;30:239–264. doi: 10.1071/FP02076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Z, Cuin TA, Zhou M, Twomey A, Naidu BP, Shabala S. Compatible solute accumulation and stress-mitigating effects in barley genotypes contrasting in their salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2007;58:4245–4255. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christensen MJ, Bennett RJ, Ansari HA, et al. Epichloë endophytes grow intercalary hyphal extension in elongating grass leaves. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2008;45:84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark DA, Caradus JR, Monaghan RM, Sharp P, Thorrold BS. Issues and options for future dairy farming in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 2007;50:203–221. [Google Scholar]
- Clay K, Schardl C. Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. American Naturalist. 2002;160:S99–S127. doi: 10.1086/342161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colebatch G, Kloska S, Trevaskis B, Freund S, Altmann T, Udvardi MK. Novel aspects of symbiotic nitrogen fixation uncovered by transcript profiling with cDNA arrays. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions. 2002;15:411–420. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.5.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colebatch G, Desbrosses G, Ott T, et al. Global changes in transcription orchestrate metabolic differentiation during symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Lotus japonicus. The Plant Journal. 2004;39:487–512. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collins NZ, Tardieu F, Tuberosa R. Quantitative trait loci and crop performance under stress: where do we stand? Plant Physiology. 2008;147:469–486. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.118117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crawford NM, Glass ADM. Molecular and physiologic aspects of nitrate uptake in plants. Trends in Plant Science. 1998;3:389–395. [Google Scholar]
- Desbrosses GG, Kopka J, Udvardi MK. Lotus japonicus metabolic profiling: development of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry resources for the study of plant–microbe interactions. Plant Physiology. 2005;137:1302–1318. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.054957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding Y, Oldroyd GED. Positioning the nodule, the hormone dictum. Plant Signaling and Behavior. 2009;4:89–93. doi: 10.4161/psb.4.2.7693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixon RA, Paiva NL. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. The Plant Cell. 1995;7:1085–1097. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.7.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Draper J, Rasmussen S, Zubair H. Metabolite analysis and metabolomics in the study of biotrophic interactions between plants and microbes. In: Hall RD, editor. Biology of plant metabolomics. Annual Plant Reviews. Vol. 43. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2011. pp. 25–59. [Google Scholar]
- Easton HS, Latch GCM, Tapper BA, Ball OJ-P. Ryegrass host genetic control of concentrations of endophyte-derived alkaloids. Crop Science. 2002;42:51–57. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2002.5100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eaton CJ, Cox MP, Ambrose B, et al. Disruption of signaling in a fungal–grass symbiosis leads to pathogenesis. Plant Physiology. 2010;153:1780–1794. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.158451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edwards GR, Parsons AJ, Rasmussen S, Bryant RH. High sugar grasses for livestock systems in New Zealand. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 2007;69:161–172. [Google Scholar]
- Faville MJ, Richardson K, Gagic M, et al. Genetic improvement of fibre traits in perennial ryegrass. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 2010;72:71–78. [Google Scholar]
- Fernie AR, Klee HJ. The use of natural genetic diversity in the understanding of metabolic organization and regulation. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2011;2:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2011.00059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernie AR, Schauer N. Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement? Trends in Genetics. 2008;25:39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer HM. Environmental regulation of rhizobial symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Trends in Microbiology. 1996;4:317–320. doi: 10.1016/0966-842x(96)10049-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fleetwood DJ, Scott B, Lane GA, Tanaka A, Johnson RD. A complex ergovaline gene cluster in Epichloë endophytes of grasses. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73:2571–2579. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00257-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foito A, Byrne SL, Shepherd T, Stewart D, Barth S. Transcriptional and metabolic profiles of Lolium perenne L. genotypes in response to a PEG-induced water stress. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2009;7:719–732. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00437.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frölich C, Hartmann T, Ober D. Tissue distribution and biosynthesis of 1,2-saturated pyrrolizidine alkaloids in Phalaenopsis hybrids (Orchidaceae) Phytochemistry. 2006;67:1493–1502. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gallagher RT, Hawkes AD, Steyn PS, Vleggaar R. Tremorgenic neurotoxins from perennial ryegrass causing ryegrass staggers disorder of livestock: structure elucidation of Lolitrem B. Journal of the Chemical Society – Chemical Communications. 1984;9:614–616. [Google Scholar]
- Gaude N, Bortfeld S, Duensing N, Lohse M, Krajinski F. Arbuscule-containing and non-colonized cortical cells of mycorrhizal roots undergo massive and specific reprogramming during arbuscular mycorrhizal development. The Plant Journal. 2012;69:510–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04810.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibson KE, Kobayashi H, Walker GC. Molecular determinants of a symbiotic chronic infection. Annual Review of Genetics. 2008;42:413–441. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilbert N. The disappearing nutrient. Nature. 2009;461:716–718. doi: 10.1038/461716a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gornall J, Betts R, Burke E, et al. Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2010;365:2973–2989. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graham PH, Vance CP. Nitrogen fixation in perspective: an overview of research and extension needs. Field Crops Research. 2000;65:93–106. [Google Scholar]
- Graham PH, Vance CP. Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiology. 2003;131:872–877. doi: 10.1104/pp.017004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall RD. Plant metabolomics: from holistic hope, to hype, to hot topic. New Phytologist. 2006;169:453–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01632.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall RD. Plant metabolomics in a nutshell: potential and future challenges. Annual Plant Reviews. 2011;43:1–24. [Google Scholar]
- Hammond JP, White PJ. Sucrose transport in the phloem: integrating root responses to phosphorus starvation. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2008;59:93–109. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrison SJ, Fraser K, Lane GA, Villas-Boas S, Rasmussen S. A reverse-phase liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method for the analysis of high-molecular-weight fructooligosaccharides. Analytical Biochemistry. 2009;395:113–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrison S, Fraser K, Lane G, Hughes D, Villas-Boas S, Rasmussen S. Analysis of high-molecular-weight fructan polymers in crude plant extracts by high-resolution LC-MS. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2011;401:2955–2963. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-5374-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrison S, Xue H, Lane G, Villas-Boas S, Rasmussen S. Linear ion trap MSn of enzymatically synthesized 13C-labeled fructans reveals differentiating fragmentation patterns of β (1-2) and β (1-6) fructans and provides a tool for oligosaccharide identification in complex mixtures. Analytical Chemistry. 2012 doi: 10.1021/ac202816y. in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac202816y . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hernández G, Valdés-López O, Ramirez M, et al. Global changes in the transcript and metabolic profiles during symbiotic nitrogen fixation in phosphorus-stressed common bean plants. Plant Physiology. 2009;151:1221–1238. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.143842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hofmann RW, Campbell BD, Fountain DW, et al. Multivariate analysis of intraspecific responses to UV-B radiation in white clover (Trifolium repens L.) Plant, Cell & Environment. 2001;24:917–927. [Google Scholar]
- Hofmann RW, Campbell BD, Bloor SJ, et al. Responses to UV-B radiation in Trifolium repens L.: physiological links to plant productivity and water availability. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2003;26:603–612. [Google Scholar]
- Hohnjec N, Becker JD, Pühler A, Perlick AM, Küster H. Genomic organization and expression properties of the MtSucS1 gene, which encodes a nodule-enhanced sucrose synthase in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 1999;261:514–522. doi: 10.1007/s004380050995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hummel I, Pantin F, Sulpice R, et al. Arabidopsis plants acclimate to water deficit at low cost through changes of carbon usage: an integrated perspective using growth, metabolite, enzyme, and gene expression analysis. Plant Physiology. 2010;154:357–372. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.157008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Humphreys MW, Yadav RS, Cairns AJ, Turner LB, Humphreys J, Skøt L. A changing climate for grassland research. New Phytologist. 2006;169:9–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01549.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Javot H, Penmetsa RV, Terzaghi N, Cook DR, Harrison MJ. A Medicago truncatula phosphate transporter indispensable for the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2007;104:1720–1725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608136104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamoshita A, Wade LJ, Ali ML, et al. Mapping QTLs for root morphology of a rice population adapted to rainfed lowland conditions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2002;104:880–893. doi: 10.1007/s00122-001-0837-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keurentjes JJB. Genetical metabolomics: closing in on phenotypes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2009;12:223–230. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keurentjes JJB, Fu J, de Vos CHR, et al. The genetics of plant metabolism. Nature Genetics. 2006;38:842–849. doi: 10.1038/ng1815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kiers ET, Denison RF. Sanctions, cooperation, and the stability of plant–rhizosphere mutualisms. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics. 2008;39:215–236. [Google Scholar]
- Kliebenstein DJ. Advancing genetic theory and application by metabolic quantitative trait loci analysis. The Plant Cell. 2009;21:1637–1646. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.067611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kouchi H, Shimomura K, Hata S, et al. Large-scale analysis of gene expression profiles during early stages of root nodule formation in a model legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Research. 2004;11:263–274. doi: 10.1093/dnares/11.4.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koulman A, Tapper BA, Fraser K, Cao M, Lane GA, Rasmussen S. High-throughput direct-infusion ion trap mass spectrometry: a new method for metabolomics. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2007;21:421–428. doi: 10.1002/rcm.2854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koulman A, Seeliger C, Edwards PJB, et al. E/Z-Thesinine-O-4′-a-rhamnoside, pyrrolizidine conjugates produced by grasses (Poaceae) Phytochemistry. 2008;69:1927–1932. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koulman A, Cao M, Faville M, Lane G, Mace W, Rasmussen S. Semi-quantitative and structural metabolic phenotyping by direct infusion ion trap mass spectrometry and its application in genetical metabolomics. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2009;23:2253–2263. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koulman A, Lee V, Fraser K, et al. Identification of extracellular siderophores and a related peptide from the endophytic fungus Epichloë festucae in culture and endophyte-infected Lolium perenne. Phytochemistry. 2012;75:128–139. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krouk G, Crawford NM, Coruzzi GM, Tsay Y-F. Nitrate signaling: adaptation to fluctuating environments. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2010;13:266–273. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lam H-M, Coschigano KT, Oliveira IC, Melo-Oliveira R, Coruzzi GM. The molecular-genetics of nitrogen assimilation into amino acids in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 1996;47:569–593. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lam TB-T, Iiyama K, Stone BA. Hot alkali-labile linkages in the walls of the forage grass Phalaris aquatica and Lolium perenne and their relation to in vitro wall digestibility. Phytochemistry. 2003;64:603–607. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(03)00301-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lane GA, Christensen MJ, Miles CO. Coevolution of fungal endophytes with grasses: the significance of secondary metabolites. In: Bacon CW, White JF, editors. Microbial endophytes. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 2000. pp. 341–388. [Google Scholar]
- Langridge P, Fleury D. Making the most of ‘omics’ for crop breeding. Trends in Biotechnology. 2011;29:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leuchtmann A. Systematics, distribution, and host specificity of grass endophytes. Natural Toxins. 1992;1:150–162. doi: 10.1002/nt.2620010303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Q, Parsons AJ, Xue H, et al. Competition between foliar Neotyphodium lolii endophytes and mycorrhizal Glomus spp. fungi in Lolium perenne depends on resource supply and host carbohydrate content. Functional Ecology. 2011;25:910–920. [Google Scholar]
- Ludlow MM, Muchow RC. sA critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yield in water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy. 1990;43:107–153. [Google Scholar]
- Lyons PC, Plattner RD, Bacon CW. Occurrence of peptide and clavinet ergot alkaloids in tall fescue grass. Science. 1986;232:487–489. doi: 10.1126/science.3008328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manthey K, Krajinski F, Hohnjec N, et al. Transcriptome profiling in root nodules and arbuscular mycorrhiza identifies a collection of novel genes induced during Medicago truncatula root endosymbioses. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions. 2004;17:1063–1077. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.10.1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matamoros MA, Loscos J, Coronado MJ, et al. Biosynthesis of ascorbic acid in legume root nodules. Plant Physiology. 2006;141:1068–1077. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.081463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer RC, Steinfath M, Lisec J, et al. The metabolic signature related to high plant growth rate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA. 2007;104:4759–4764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609709104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller LA, Moorby JM, Davies DR, et al. Increased concentration of water soluble carbohydrate in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.): milk production from late-lactation dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science. 2001;56:383–394. [Google Scholar]
- Misson J, Raghothama KG, Jain A, et al. sA genome-wide transcriptional analysis using Arabidopsis thaliana Affymetrix gene chips determined plant responses to phosphate deprivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2005;102:11934–11939. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505266102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morcuende R, Bari R, Gibon Y, et al. Genome-wide reprogramming of metabolism and regulatory networks of Arabidopsis in response to phosphorus. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2007;30:85–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01608.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morreel K, Goeminne G, Storme V, et al. Genetical metabolomics of flavonoid biosynthesis in Populus: a case study. The Plant Journal. 2006;47:224–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02786.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morvan-Bertrand A, Boucaud J, Le Saos J, Prud'homme M-P. Roles of fructans from leaf sheaths and from the elongating leaf bases in the regrowth following defoliation of Lolium perenne L. Planta. 2001;213:109–120. doi: 10.1007/s004250000478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mouradov AZ. Designer pasture plants: from single cells to the field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan Republic: Biological Sciences. 2010;65:205–211. [Google Scholar]
- Müller R, Morant M, Jarmer , Nilsson L, Nielsen TH. Genome-wide analysis of the Arabidopsis leaf transcriptome reveals interaction of phosphate and sugar metabolism. Plant Physiology. 2007;143:156–171. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.090167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nilsson L, Müller R, Nielsen TH. Dissecting the plant transcriptome and the regulatory responses to phosphate deprivation. Physiologia Plantarum. 2010;139:129–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noctor G, Noviskaya L, Lea PJ, Foyer CH. Co-ordination of leaf minor amino acid contents in crop species: significance and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2002;53:939–945. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.370.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oldroyd GED, Downie JA. Coordinating nodule morphogenesis with rhizobial infection in legumes. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2008;59:519–546. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oldroyd GE, Harrison MJ, Paszkowski U. Reprogramming plant cells for endosymbioses. Science. 2009;324:753–755. doi: 10.1126/science.1171644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Orcutt DM, Nilsen ET. The physiology of plants under stress: soil and biotic factors. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Parsons AJ, Harvey A, Woledge J. Plant/animal interactions in continuously grazed mixtures. I. Differences in the physiology of leaf expansion and the fate of leaves of grass and clover. Journal of Applied Ecology. 1991;28:619–634. [Google Scholar]
- Parsons AJ, Rasmussen S, Xue H, Newman JA, Anderson CB, Cosgrove GP. Some high sugar grasses don't like it hot. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 2004;66:265–272. [Google Scholar]
- Parsons AJ, Edwards GR, Newton PCD, et al. Past lessons and future prospects: plant breeding for yield and persistence in cool-temperate pastures. Grass and Forage Science. 2011a;66:153–172. [Google Scholar]
- Parsons AJ, Rowarth JS, Rasmussen S. High-sugar grasses. CAB Reviews: perspectives in agriculture, veterinary science, nutrition and natural Resources. 2011b:1–12. doi: 10.1079/pavsnnr202116039. 6 No. 046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pavis N, Boucaud J, Prud'homme MP. Fructans and fructan metabolising enzymes in leaves of Lolium perenne. New Phytologist. 2001;150:97–109. [Google Scholar]
- Pessi G, Ahrens CH, Rehrauer H, et al. Genome-wide transcript analysis of Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroids in soybean root nodules. Molecular Plant–Microbe Interactions. 2007;20:1353–1363. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-20-11-1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfeffer PE, Bago B, Shachar-Hill Y. Exploring mycorrhizal function with NMR spectroscopy. New Phytologist. 2001;150:543–553. [Google Scholar]
- Pollock CJ, Cairns AJ. Fructan metabolism in grasses and cereals. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 1991;42:77–101. [Google Scholar]
- Pollock CJ, Jones T. Seasonal patterns of fructan metabolism in forage grasses. New Phytologist. 1979;83:9–15. [Google Scholar]
- Prell J, White JP, Bourdes A, Bunnewell S, Bongaerts RJ, Poole PS. Legumes regulate Rhizobium bacteroid development and persistence by the supply of branched-chain amino acids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2009;106:12477–12482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903653106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen S. Biosynthesis and manipulation of flavonoids in forage legumes. In: Gould K, Davies K, Winefield C, editors. Anthocyanins: biosynthesis, functions, and applications. New York, NY: Springer; 2009. pp. 257–281. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen S, Cao M, Fraser K, et al. Cold stress in white clover – an integrated view of metabolome and transcriptome responses. In: Mercer CF, editor. Advances in pasture plant breeding. Dunedin, New Zealand: Grassland Research and Practice Series No. 12; 2006. pp. 750–757. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen S, Parsons AJ, Bassett S, et al. High nitrogen supply and carbohydrate content reduce fungal endophyte and alkaloid concentration in Lolium perenne. New Phytologist. 2007;173:787–797. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01960.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen S, Parsons AJ, Fraser K, Xue H, Newman JA. Metabolic profiles of Lolium perenne are differentially affected by nitrogen supply, carbohydrate content, and fungal endophyte infection. Plant Physiology. 2008a;146:1440–1453. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.111898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen S, Parsons AJ, Popay A, Xue H, Newman JA. Plant–endophyte–herbivore interactions: more than just alkaloids? Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2008b;3:974–977. doi: 10.4161/psb.6171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen S, Parsons AJ, Newman JA. Metabolomics analysis of the Lolium perenne–Neotyphodium lolii symbiosis: more than just alkaloids? Phytochemistry Review. 2009a;8:535–550. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen S, Parsons AJ, Xue H, Newman JA. High sugar grasses: harnessing the benefits of new cultivars through growth management. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 2009b;71:167–175. [Google Scholar]
- Read DJ, Perez-Moreno J. Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems: a journey towards relevance? New Phytologist. 2003;157:475–492. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00704.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards RA. Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regulation. 1996;20:157–166. [Google Scholar]
- Richards RA. Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. Agricultural Water Management. 2006;80:197–211. [Google Scholar]
- Roy SJ, Tucker EJ, Tester M. Genetic analysis of abiotic stress tolerance in crops. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2011;14:232–239. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan G, Parsons AJ, Rasmussen S, Newman JA. Can optimality models and an ‘optimality research program’ help us understand some plant–fungal relationships? Fungal Ecology. 2008;1:115–123. [Google Scholar]
- Sakakibara H, Takei K, Hirose N. Interactions between nitrogen and cytokinins in the regulation of metabolism and development. Trends in Plant Science. 2006;11:440–448. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salekdeh GH, Reynolds M, Bennett J, Boyer J. sConceptual framework for drought phenotyping during molecular breeding. Trends in Plant Science. 2009;14:488–496. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sambatti JBM, Caylor KK. When is breeding for drought tolerance optimal if drought is random? New Phytologist. 2007;175:70–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanchez DH, Pieckenstain FL, Escaray F, et al. Comparative ionomics and metabolomics in extremophile and glycophytic Lotus species under salt stress challenge the metabolic pre-adaptation hypothesis. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2011;34:605–617. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02266.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanchez DH, Schwabe F, Erban A, Udvardi MK, Kopka J. Comparative metabolomics of drought acclimation in model and forage legumes. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2012;35:136–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02423.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schardl CL, Leuchtmann LA, Spiering MJ. Symbioses of grasses with seedborne fungal endophytes. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2004;55:315–340. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schauer N, Semel Y, Roessner U, et al. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nature Biotechnology. 2006;24:447–454. doi: 10.1038/nbt1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schliemann W, Ammer C, Strack D. Metabolite profiling of mycorrhizal roots of Medicago truncatula. Phytochemistry. 2008;69:112–146. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.06.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulze J. How are nitrogen fixation rates regulated in legumes? Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2004;167:125–137. [Google Scholar]
- Shachar-Hill Y, Pfeffer PE, Douds D, Osman SF, Doner LW, Ratcliffe RG. Partitioning of intermediary carbon metabolism in vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal leek. Plant Physiology. 1995;108:7–15. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith AM, Stitt M. Coordination of carbon supply and plant growth. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2007;30:1126–1149. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01708.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. 3rd edn. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Soto MJ, Fernández-Aparicio M, Castellanos-Morales V, et al. First indications for the involvement of strigolactones on nodule formation in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2010;42:383–385. [Google Scholar]
- Spiering MJ, Wilkinson HH, Blankenship JD, Schardl CL. Expressed sequence tags and genes associated with loline alkaloid expression by the fungal endophyte Neotyphodium uncinatum. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2002;36:242–254. doi: 10.1016/s1087-1845(02)00023-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stewart D, Shepherd LVT, Hall RD, Fraser PD. Crops and tasty, nutritious food: how can metabolomics help? Annual Plant Reviews. 2011;43:181–217. [Google Scholar]
- Stitt M, Müller C, Matt P, et al. Steps toward an integrated view of nitrogen metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2002;53:959–970. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.370.959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strickland JR, Bailey EM, Abney LK, Oliver JW. Assessment of the mitogenic potential of the alkaloids produced by endophyte (Acremonium coenophialum)-infected tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) on bovine vascular smooth muscle in vitro. Journal of Animal Science. 1996;74:1664–1671. doi: 10.2527/1996.7471664x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sumner LW, Mendes P, Dixon RA. Plant metabolomics: large scale phytochemistry in the functional genomics era. Phytochemistry. 2003;62:817–836. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(02)00708-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka A, Tapper BA, Popay A, Parker EJ, Scott B. A symbiosis expressed non-ribosomal peptide synthetase from a mutualistic fungal endophyte of perennial ryegrass confers protection to the symbiotum from insect herbivory. Molecular Microbiology. 2005;57:1036–1050. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04747.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka A, Christensen MJ, Takemoto D, Park P, Scott B. Reactive oxygen species play a role in regulating a fungus–perennial ryegrass mutualistic interaction. The Plant Cell. 2006;18:1052–1066. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.039263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanaka A, Takemoto D, Hyon G-S, Park P, Scott B. NoxA activation by the small GTPase RacA is required to maintain a mutualistic symbiotic association between Epichloë festucae and perennial ryegrass. Molecular Microbiology. 2008;68:1165–1178. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tardieu F. Plant tolerance to water deficits: physical limits and possibilities for progress. Comptes Rendus Geoscience. 2005;337:57–67. [Google Scholar]
- Theodorou ME, Plaxton WC. Metabolic adaptations of plant respiration to nutritional phosphate deprivation. Plant Physiology. 1993;101:339–344. doi: 10.1104/pp.101.2.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tieman DM, Zeigler M, Schmelz E, et al. Identification of loci affecting flavour volatile emissions in tomato fruits. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2006;57:887–896. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tuberosa R, Salvi S. Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops. Trends in Plant Science. 2006;11:405–412. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner LB, Cairns AJ, Armstead IP, et al. Dissecting the regulation of fructan metabolism in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) with quantitative trait locus mapping. New Phytologist. 2006;169:45–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01575.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner LB, Cairns AJ, Armstead IP, Thomas H, Humphreys MW, Humphreys MO. Does fructan have a functional role in physiological traits? Investigation by quantitative trait locus mapping. New Phytologist. 2008;179:765–775. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02495.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vance CP. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition: plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiology. 2001;127:390–397. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vance CP, Gregerson RG, Robinson DL, Miller SS, Gantt JS. Primary assimilation of nitrogen in alfalfa nodules: molecular features of the enzymes involved. Plant Science. 1994;101:51–64. [Google Scholar]
- Vance CP, Uhde-Sonne C, Allan DL. Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a non-renewable resource. New Phytologist. 2003;157:423–447. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vazquez-Robinet C, Mane SP, Ulanov AV, et al. Physiological and molecular adaptations to drought in Andean potato genotypes. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2008;59:2109–2123. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Widodo PJH, Newbigin E, Tester M, Bacic A, Roessner U. Metabolic responses to salt stress of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Sahara and Clipper, which differ in salinity tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2009;60:4089–4103. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkins PW, Humphreys MO. Progress in breeding perennial forage grasses for temperate agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2003;140:129–150. [Google Scholar]
- Wilkins PW, Lovatt JA. Progress in improving the ratio of water-soluble carbohydrate to crude protein in perennial ryegrass. Aspects of Applied Biology. 2003;70:31–36. [Google Scholar]
- Young CA, Felitti S, Shields K, et al. A complex gene cluster for indole-diterpene biosynthesis in the grass endophyte Neotyphodium lolii. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 2006;43:679–693. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Mian MAR, Bouton JH. Recent molecular and genomic studies on stress tolerance of forage and turf grasses. Crop Science. 2006;46:497–511. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu YG, Miller RM. Carbon cycling by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil–plant systems. Trends in Plant Science. 2003;8:407–409. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(03)00184-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]