To the Editor:
Allergen measurements require well-defined allergen standards. Allergists rely on these measurements for dosing patients on immunotherapy with the aim of achieving maintenance doses of 5 to 20 µg of specific allergen that have been associated with clinical efficacy.1 Allergists need to know that allergen measurements made by manufacturers are consistent and can reliably be used in clinical practice. Allergen measurements are widely used in the indoor air quality industry to assess exposure in homes, the workplace, schools, and commercial buildings. They are routinely used for assessing health risks associated with allergen exposure, for assessing the efficacy of allergen avoidance procedures, and for developing new allergen control products.2
Measurements of allergens by ELISA rely on standards of known allergen concentration, but few national or international allergen standards exist. The World Health Organization/International Union of Immunological Societies (WHO/IUIS) Allergen Standardization Committee initiated a program to develop purified allergen standards for calibration of in vitro measurements. This initiative was funded by the European Union to develop certified reference materials for allergenic products (“Development of Certified Reference Materials for Allergenic Products and Validation of Methods for their Quantification,” acronym CREATE). The aims of CREATE were to develop international reference materials with verifiable allergen content.3,4
Our goal was to apply the principles of allergen standardization developed in CREATE to other purified allergens. We developed a single “universal” allergen standard (UAS) for use in ELISA and in a fluorescent multiplex array for indoor allergens.5 Purified proteins are essential in multiplex systems to reduce nonspecific interactions. Eight purified allergens (Der p 1, Der f 1, Der p 2, Fel d 1, Can f 1, Rat n 1, Mus m 1, and Bla g 2) were combined in the UAS. The protein concentration of the purified allergens was determined by amino-acid analysis, in keeping with CREATE. A detailed validation of the UAS and comparison with previous ELISA standards will be published elsewhere.6 Here, we report the concentration of specific allergens in WHO/IUIS and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reference preparations using the single multiallergen standard.
Specific allergen concentrations of WHO/IUIS and FDA reference preparations were determined by using ELISA (Table I). The WHO/IUIS Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus standard 82/518 has been widely used as a standard for measurements of allergen exposure with a reported concentration of 12.5 µg Der p 1 per ampoule.7 A value of 7.2 µg Der p 1 per ampoule was obtained by using the UAS, which is similar to estimates of 5 µg Der p 1 per ampoule reported previously.8,9 The WHO/IUIS dog hair standard has an assigned potency of 100,000 IUs per ampoule and contained 20.4 µg Can f 1 per ampoule as determined by using the UAS.
TABLE I.
Units | Allergen | Concentration | |
---|---|---|---|
WHO-IUIS standards* | |||
Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus 82/518 | 100,000 IU/ampoule | Der p 1 | 7.2 µg/ampoule |
Dog hair 84/685 | 100,000 IU/ampoule | Can f 1 | 20.4 µg/ampoule† |
FDA standards‡ | |||
D pteronyssinus E8 | 10,000 AU/mL | Der p 1 | 20.3 µg/mL |
D pteronyssinus E10 | 10,000 AU/mL | Der p 1 | 27.6 µg/mL |
D pteronyssinus E8 | 10,000 AU/mL | Der p 2 | 23.4 µg/mL |
D pteronyssinus E10 | 10,000 AU per mL | Der p 2 | 23.5 µg/mL |
D farinae E9 | 10,000 AU/mL | Der f 1 | 19.9 µg/mL |
D farinae E10 | 10,000 AU/mL | Der f 1 | 29.2 µg/mL |
D farinae E9 | 10,000 AU/mL | Der f 2§ | 19.2 µg/mL |
D farinae E10 | 10,000 AU/mL | Der f 2§ | 15.0 µg/mL |
Cat hair E4 | 10,000 BAU/mL or 7.0 Fel d 1 units/mL | Fel d 1 | 5.4 µg/mL‖ |
Cat pelt E4 | 10,000 BAU/mL or 14.8 Fel d 1 units/mL | Fel d 1 | 15.6 µg/mL‖ |
Cat hair E5 | 10,000 BAU/mL or 22.0 Fel d 1 units per mL | Fel d 1 | 24.8 µg/mL‖ |
BAU, Bioequivalent allergy unit.
Mean of duplicate determinations.
Based on these data, 1 IU Can f 1 = ~5 ng Can f 1.
Mean data from measurements by 2 operators on 3 separate occasions. The values for Fel d 1 units in the cat hair and pelt standards were determined by radial immunodiffusion by the FDA (data kindly provided by Cherry Valerio, FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research).
Determined using a separate in-house natural Der f 2 standard with a concentration of 1.25 mg/mL by amino acid analysis.
1 FDA unit Fel d 1 = ~1 µg Fel d 1.
There are no published reports of the specific allergen concentrations of US FDA reference materials. The 10,000 allergy units/mL D pteronyssinus references had similar concentrations of Der p 1 and Der p 2 in both the E8 and E10 standards (range, 20.3–27.6 µg/mL) (Table I). The 10,000 allergy units/mL D farinae references (E9 and E10) contained comparable levels of Der f 1 to the levels of Der p 1 seen in the D pteronyssinus references. It was not possible to use the Der p 2 standard in the UAS for the calibration of Der f 2 in D farinae references. The Der p 2 standard in the UAS underestimated the amount of Der f 2 by ~8-fold (data not shown). The Der f 2 concentration of 10,000 allergy units/mL D farinae references was determined by using a purified in-house Der f 2 standard (Table I). The Der f 2 concentrations of the E9 and E10 D farinae references were very similar. It was reassuring that the allergen levels in E8 and E9 (previous mite standards) were broadly similar to those of the current E10 standard. Overall, Group 1 and Group 2 allergen levels were comparable, and in some cases almost identical, in the FDA references for both mite species.
The FDA assigns potency to cat allergenic products based on the Fel d 1 content determined by radial immunodiffusion. Allergenic products containing 10 to 19.9 FDA units/mL of Fel d 1 have an assigned potency of 10,000 bioequivalent allergy units/mL.10 The Fel d 1 values in units of 2 of the FDA references (E4 and E5 hair) were outside of the recommended range. The Fel d 1 concentrations in micrograms per milliliter of the FDA cat references (E4 and E5) determined by ELISA using the UAS were consistent with the results obtained by radial immunodiffusion (Table I).
Our data confirm that the Der p 1 level of 12.5 µg per ampoule assigned to the WHO/IUIS D pteronyssinus standard (National Institute for Biological Standards and Control 82/518) is an overestimate and that the actual value is in the range of 5 to 7 µg per ampoule.8,9 The data show that 1 unit Can f 1 in the WHO/IUIS dog hair extract (National Institute for Biological Standards and Control 84/685) corresponds to 5 ng Can f 1 and that 1 FDA unit Fel d 1 is ~1 µg Fel d 1. Values obtained by using previous standards have been applied to many studies involving thresholds or guidelines for exposure levels that result in allergic sensitization or symptom exacerbations.6 At this point, we do not believe that revision of such guidelines in the absence of further epidemiologic data would be worthwhile. Rather, future studies should incorporate purified allergen standards into the exposure assessment to generate a body of data based on standards that fulfill the CREATE principles.
Dosing of immunotherapy based on measurements of specific allergens plays an increasing role in allergy practice.1 Although several US allergen manufacturers routinely measure specific allergens in their immunotherapy products, these measurements are not based on a national standard and may not be directly comparable. Our data provide the specific allergen concentrations in mite and cat allergen reference preparations used by the FDA for potency testing of all US standardized allergenic products. This provides a mechanism for standardizing allergen measurements in US products that allergists use for immunotherapy.
The results suggest that the approach of using multiallergen standards could be extended to other sources, for example, pollens, molds, and foods, where purified allergens are available. It is critically important that regulatory agencies generate purified natural or recombinant allergen standards that researchers and companies can use as reference preparations. Two of the allergens used in CREATE, Bet v 1 and Phl p 5, are being formulated as biological reference preparations by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines.4 ELISA tests for each allergen are also being validated to produce certified ELISA products that can be used for analytical purposes. Once completed, the biological reference preparations will be incorporated into the European Pharmacopoeia and will become international standards for licensing of allergenic products. Our data demonstrate the feasibility of applying CREATE principles to other allergens and underline the need for validated purified allergens and assays to be developed and maintained by standardization agencies and regulatory authorities.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (Potters Bar, United Kingdom) and to the US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (Rockville, Md), for providing allergen reference materials.
S.F., A.T., L.D.V., E.M.K., and M.D.C. were supported by Indoor Biotechnologies, Inc, and by National Institutes of Health Small Business Innovation and Research (SBIR) Award ES55545C from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. L.D.V., M.D.C., G.G., and F.F. were supported by the European 5th Framework Programme CREATE project (G6RD-CT-2001-00582). E.M. was supported by the National Institutes of Health (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grants R01AI070630 and R01AI081845; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grants P50ES015903 and P01ES018176) and by the Environmental Protection Agency.
A. Tsay has received research support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and is currently employed by Rho Inc, Chapel Hill, NC. F Ferreira has consulted for Allergen Online and Biomay AG, is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Indoor Biotechnologies Inc, and has received research support from the Christian Doppler Research Association, the Austrian Science Fund, and the European Union. E. Matsui has received research support from the National Institutes of Health. M. D. Chapman is president and CEO of Indoor Biotechnologies and has received research support from NIEHS and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Footnotes
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: S. Filep, L. D. Vailes, and E. M. King are employees of Indoor Biotechnologies, Inc.
G. Gadermaier declares that she has no relevant conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Nelson HS. Allergen immunotherapy: where is it now? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119:769–779. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Platts-Mills TA, Vervloet D, Thomas WR, Aalberse RC, Chapman MD. Indoor allergens and asthma: report of the Third International Workshop. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;100:S2–S24. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70292-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.van RR, Chapman MD, Ferreira F, Vieths S, Bryan D, Cromwell O, et al. The CREATE project: development of certified reference materials for allergenic products and validation of methods for their quantification. Allergy. 2008;63:310–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01612.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chapman MD, Ferreira F, Villalba M, Cromwell O, Bryan D, Becker WM, et al. The European Union CREATE project: a model for international standardization of allergy diagnostics and vaccines. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:882–889. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.07.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Earle CD, King EM, Tsay A, Pittman K, Saric B, Vailes L, et al. High-throughput fluorescent multiplex array for indoor allergen exposure assessment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119:428–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Filep S, Tsay A, Vailes LD, Gadermaier G, Ferreira F, Matsui EC, et al. A multiallergen standard for immunoassays: CREATE principles applied to eight purified allergens. Allergy. 2011 Nov 18; doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02750.x. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ford AW, Rawle FC, Lind P, Spieksma FT, Lowenstein H, Platts-Mills TA. Standardization of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus: assessment of potency and allergen content in ten coded extracts. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1985;76:58–67. doi: 10.1159/000233662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yasueda H, Saito A, Akiyama K, Maeda Y, Shida T, Sakaguchi M, et al. Estimation of Der p and Der f I quantities in the reference preparations of Dermatophagoides mite extracts. Clin Exp Allergy. 1994;24:1030–1035. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1994.tb02739.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meyer CH, Bond JF, Chen MS, Kasaian MT. Comparison of the levels of the major allergens Der p I and Der p II in standardized extracts of the house dust mite, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. Clin Exp Allergy. 1994;24:1041–1048. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1994.tb02741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Turkeltaub PC. Biological standardization. Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M. 1997;91:145–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]