Abstract
Purpose
Open fractures with severe soft-tissue trauma are predisposed to poor bone healing. The vital coupling between osteo- and angiogenesis is disturbed. Cysteine-rich protein 61 (CYR61) is an angiogenic inducer promoting vascularisation. However, little is known about the effect of CYR61 on the callus regenerate after acute musculoskeletal trauma. Therefore, our aim was to determine whether local administration of CYR61: (1) has an influence on callus formation and remodelling, (2) increases bone volume and (3) partially restores callus stability.
Methods
A musculoskeletal trauma was created in 20 rabbits. To simulate fracture-site debridement, the limb was shortened. In the test group, a CYR61-coated collagen matrix was locally applied around the osteotomy. After ten days, gradual distraction was commenced (0.5 mm/12 h) to restore the original length. New bone formation was evaluated histomorphometrically, radiographically and biomechanically.
Results
Osseus consolidation occured in all animals. Average maximum callus diameter was higher in the test group [1.39 mm; standard deviation (SD) = 0.078 vs 1.26 mm (SD = 0.14); p = 0.096]. In addition, bone volume was higher (p = 0.11) in the test group, with a mean value of 49.73 % (SD = 13.68) compared with 37.6 % (SD = 5.91). Torsional strength was significantly higher (p = 0.005) in the test group [105.43 % (SD = 31.68 %) vs. 52.57 % (SD = 24.39)]. Instead, stiffness of the newly reconstructed callus decreased (64.21 % (SD = 11.52) vs. 71.30 % (SD = 32.25) (p = 0.81)).
Conclusions
CYR61 positively influences callus regenerate after acute trauma, not only histologically and radiographically but also biomechanically, most probably by a CYR61-associated pathway.
Introduction
Trauma and fracture repair occur as a complex process that involves inflammation, angiogenesis, chondrogenesis, enchondral ossification and bone remodelling. This process is disturbed in high-energy injuries with open fractures of the lower limb associated with soft-tissue damage, bone defects and impaired local perfusion. Initial treatment of this fracture type includes radical soft-tissue and bone debridement, acute shortening to close bone defects and stabilisation with an external fixator [1]. Elevated compartment pressure impairs bone and soft-tissue perfusion, which improves when the limb is shortened about 10 % [2]. One treatment option for restoring the original length is a distraction procedure, normally using a second osteotomy near the metaphyseal region. Alternatively, distraction osteogenesis at the fracture site can gain bone regeneration in a shorter period of time without the necessity for further operations [1, 3–5].
Microvascularisation and microcirculation are crucial for fracture repair and bone regeneration [6]. Soft-tissue trauma and elevated compartment pressure are two of the main reasons for regional hypoxia. Also, initial fracture haematoma, eliminated by surgery, consists of a variety of phyisiological growth factors important for angio- and vasculogenesis and fracture repair [7, 8], which are then missing at the fracture site. Previously, we demonstrated that acute soft-tissue trauma significantly compromises callus formation in a rabbit tibia after primary acute limb shortening and secondary distraction [9]. In animals with soft-tissue trauma and elevated compartment pressure, normalised mechanical values of the newly reconstructed tibia and average normalised callus diameters were smaller than in animals without soft-tissue trauma [9].
The cysteine-rich protein 61 (CYR61, CCN1) is an extracellular-matrix-associated angiogenic regulator [10] supporting cell adhesion, stimulating endothelial cell migration and enhancing growth-factor-induced cell proliferation in culture [11]. Direct proliferative action of CYR61 was described on mesenchymal stem cells, osteobasts and endothelial cells [12], with evidence of angiogenic activity, including in rabbit ischemic hindlimbs [13]. As a proangiogenic regulator, it is transcriptionally induced under hypoxia, a condition that favours blood-vessel growth by inducing several angiogenic factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), through the action of hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α). Furthermore, CCN proteins can also modulate activities of several growth factors and cytokines, including transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), VEGF, bone morphologic proteins (BMPs) and Wnt proteins, and it may thereby regulate a broad array of biological processes [14].
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of locally applied CYR61 on musculoskeletal trauma. We investigated the effect of CYR61 on osteogenesis after acute soft-tissue trauma and following a limb-shortening distraction procedure in a rabbit tibia. We postulated that local administration of CYR61 compensates callus deficiency after acute soft-tissue trauma. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether local administration of CYR61: (1) has an influence on callus formation and remodelling, (2) increases the bone volume and (3) partially restores callus stability.
Methods
Principles of laboratory animal care were followedand the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the Government Animal Control.
Injury and limb shortening
Twenty skeletally mature New Zealand white rabbits with an average weight of 3.8 kg were placed under general anesthesia with ketamine–xylazine and Isoflurane. The animals underwent a standardised musculoskeletal trauma simulating a muscle contusion injury of one lower leg, with the untreated limb serving as a paired control [9]. A unilateral external fixator–distractor (Orthofix® M-103; Orthofix SRL, Verona, Italy) was applied to the anteromedial aspect of the injured tibia, a ten millimetre diaphyseal bone block including periosteum was resected and the limb was shortened until compression-free contact of the proximal and distal bone fragments was attained.
CYR61 Application and distraction procedure
Twenty evaluable rabbits were split into two equal groups. In the test group, a 1-mm × 0.5 -m × 0.5-mm collagen matrix (Resorba) coated with 25 μg CYR61 was applied locally around the osteotomy site. In the control group, no CYR61 and no collagen matrix was applied. In both groups, bone was covered completely with local soft tissue, and a tension-free skin closure followed. After surgery, radiographs were taken in two planes. After ten days of compression-free contact between proximal and distal fragments, a gradual distraction of 0.5 mm/12 hours for ten days was performed using an external fixation device (Orthofix® M-103; Orthofix SRL, Verona, Italy) until the original length was restored (ten days).
Soft-tissue trauma, compartment pressure and blood pressure monitoring
Compartment pressure was gauged using a piezoelectric transducer (KODIAG; Braun-Dexon GmbH, Spangenberg, Germany). Bilateral pressure measurements confirmed the onset of a critically elevated compartment pressure (>30 mmHg) on the traumatised side in the test group. Arterial blood pressure was documented continuously after cannulating the medial auricular artery (PowerLab 4/35, Scope v.4.1.4 for Mac, ADInstruments GmbH, Spechbach, Germany)
Radiological analysis
Radiographs were taken after a ten day period of compression-free contact and weekly during the distraction and follow-up periods. At day 40, maximum callus diameters were measured in digital radiographs, and values were averaged in two planes and normalised to the proximal and distal ends of the diaphysis (callus–diaphysis index). Additionally, a high-resolution computed tomograph analysis (FHG HR-CT 150/3, Fraunhofer Institute, Bayreuth, Germany) was performed, and the animals were euthanised. The radiological analyses were performed under anesthesia with ketamine and xylazine.
Biomechanical testing
Both injured and uninjured tibias were dissected from soft tissues and deep frozen at −18 °C until testing. Bone specimens were embedded distally and proximally in a metal alloy (Woods Metal MCP70; HEK-Medizintechnik GmbH, Lübeck, Germany), exposing 32 mm of diaphysis, including the new bone formation, for torsion testing. Testing was performed on a motor-driven hydraulic universal material testing machine (Zwick/Roell Z020, Zwick GmbH & Co.KG, Ulm, Germany) by applying load to failure in external rotation of 108°/min. Ultimate strength was defined as the maximum applied torque. Values were normalised to the contralateral untreated side; results are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD).
Histomorphometric analysis
After mechanical testing, a 30-mm-long specimen from each tested tibia containing the new bone formation was cut longitudinally in the sagittal plane with a rotating diamond saw (EXAKT; Fa. PSI-Grünewald GmbH & Co.KG, Laudenbach, Germany). One side was decalcified for histomorphometry, and the other side was stored for further radiographic analysis of the undecalcified tissue. Specimens for decalcification were fixed in 4 % formalin, decalcified with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and embedded in paraffin (Reichert-Jung; Leica Microsystems Nussloch GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). For histology and histomorphometry, 7-μm sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and analysed with a standard light microscope (Olympus BX61, Japan) connected to a digital camera (Olympus) using its specific software program. Each callus section was photographed at 4 × magnification to obtain an individual overview. Digital pictures containing 50–70 fields with a 40 × magnification were stored. The final area calculation was determined by Image Pro Plus, Version 7.0 (Media Cybernetics, Betheseda, MD, USA).
Statistical analyses
Power analysis with alpha = 0.05, and a power of 80 % revealed for torsional strength (with the expected values mean test = 100 %, mean control = 50 %, SD = 30 %), revealed a minimum sample size of seven animals. Descriptive analysis, boxplots and normal probability plots were performed for callus diaphysis index, bone volume, torsional strength and stiffness for both groups (control and test). The probability plots showed approximately normal distribution with few outliers. Due to these outliers and to low sample size, nonparametric methods for inferential statistics were done. Wilcoxon test for independent samples was used to investigate the difference in torsional strength and callus diaphysis index between test and control groups. Scatterplot and Spearman correletation were performed for analysing the relationship between torsional strength and callus diaphysis index for the complete data and for the two groups seperately. For statistical analysis, we used SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) and R 2.13.1 [R Development Core Team (2011); R: A language and environment for statistical computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
No animals had soft-tissue problems or infections. Two animals suffered of pin loosening and had to be sacrificed. One animal died due to perioperative anaesthetic problems. The overall dropout rate was 15 %. In all other animals, osseous consolidation occured, with correct axes and length in both planes. Compartment-pressure measurement at the tibialis anterior muscle showed a pretrauma pressure of 5.7 ± 1.4 mmHg, an increase to 33.8 ± 4.0 mmHg post-trauma, and a decrease postsurgery down to pyhsiological levels of 12.4 ± 2.1 mmHg. After eight, 24 and 48 hours, compartment pressure was constant at physiological levels. Diastolic blood pressure was measured at 80.2 ± 13.9 mmHg before trauma, at 68.9 ± 15.4 mmHg posttrauma and during surgery and at 68.4 ± 14.2 mmHg postsurgery. Postsurgery, there was no critical compartment pressure, thus no fasciotomy was necessary.
Osseus consolidation was evident in both planes in all animals. Furthermore, straight callus formation and mineralisation in the lengthening gap were observed in both groups. In the test group, average maximum callus diameter was higher [1.39 mm (SD = 0.078, n = 7) (p = 0.096)] than in the control group [1.26 mm (SD = 0.14, n = 10)] (Table 1, Fig. 1a). Furthermore, bone volume was higher (p = 0.11) in the test group, with a mean value of 49.73 % (SD = 13.68, n = 7) compared with 37.6 % (SD = 5.91, n = 10) in the control group (Figs. 1b and 2). There was a significant difference (p = 0.005) between groups in torsional strength, with a mean value of 105.43 % (SD = 31.7 %, n = 7) in the test group and 52.6 % (SD = 24.39, n = 10) (p < 0.005) in the control group (Fig. 3a). Difference in torsional strength is defined as the strength ratio of the newly reconstructed limb after trauma to the contralateral side. There was a difference in stiffness of the newly reconstructed callus between groups, which was lower in the test group, with a mean value of 64.2 % (SD = 11.52, n = 7) compared with 71.3 % (SD = 32.25, n = 10) (p = 0.81) in the control group (Fig. 3b). Scatterplot and Spearman correlation showed no correlation (Spearman-Rho 0.68, p = 0.11) between the callus diaphysis index and the torsional strength.
Table 1.
Callus–diaphysis indices and torsional strength in the test versus control group
| Specimen | Torsional strength (nm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Treated | Contralateral | Percenta | |
| Test group | |||
| 1 | 1.75 | 2.33 | 75.27 |
| 2 | 2.33 | 3.30 | 70.45 |
| 3 | 2.83 | 3.70 | 76.35 |
| 4 | 1.29 | 2.47 | 52.02 |
| 5 | 2.33 | 2.47 | 94.32 |
| 6 | 3.55 | 2.89 | 81.27 |
| 7 | 1.91 | 2.09 | 91.39 |
| Mean | 2.28 | 2.75 | 77.30 |
| SD | 0.74 | 0.57 | 14.11 |
| Control group | |||
| 1 | 0.65 | 2.90 | 22.57 |
| 2 | 0.72 | 2.71 | 26.70 |
| 3 | 2.40 | 2.40 | 100.00 |
| 4 | 0.86 | 2.70 | 31.94 |
| 5 | 1.35 | 4.04 | 33.34 |
| 6 | 1.62 | 2.99 | 54.10 |
| 7 | 1.67 | 2.87 | 58.21 |
| 8 | 2.01 | 3.24 | 61.95 |
| 9 | 1.67 | 2.63 | 63.46 |
| 10 | 1.72 | 2.34 | 73.59 |
| Mean | 1.47 | 2.88 | 52.59 |
| SD | 0.57 | 0.49 | 24.26 |
SD standard deviation
aSegment strength in relation to the nonoperated side (100 %; normalised values)
Fig. 1.
In the test group, average maximum callus diameter (a) and bone volume (p = 0.11) (b) were higher in the test group
Fig. 2.
Radiological (sagittal and coronal plane; high-resolution computed tomography) and histomorphometrical aspects of callus formation in the control (a–c) and test (d–f) at day 40 showing new bone formation with higher bone volume and at the same time a higher callus diaphysis index at the distraction area in the test (CYR61) group (hematoxylin and eosin stain, magnification × 40, c, f)
Fig. 3.
Significantly higher torsional strength in the test group (a). Less stiffness of newly reconstructed callus in the test group (b)
Discussion
High-energy injuries causing open lower-limb fractures associated with soft-tissue damage, bone defects and impaired local perfusion disturb the natural bone healing process. Primary treatment includes radical soft-tissue and bone debridement, acute shortening to close bone defects and stabilisation with an external fixator [2]. This process is a complex mechanistic cascade composed of the interplay of inflammation, angiogensesis, endochondral ossification and bone remodelling. Derived from the clinical situation, we simulated a musculoskeletal injury, which leads to reduced bone quality, as previously shown [9]. Based on this trauma, the natural coupling between angio- and osteogenesis, which is a basic prerequisite for fracture healing, is diminished. Hypoxia and necrosis of the soft tissues are risk factors for poor fracture healing. Therefore, we assessed whether local administration of proangiogenic growth factor CYR61: (1) influences callus formation and remodelling, (2) increases bone volume and (3) partially restores callus stability.
There was a difference in callus bridging and competence between groups. In particular, there was a higher callus diaphysis index and at the same time a higher bone volume in the test group, which was treated with CYR61. As an angiogenic inducer, CYR61 promotes vascularisation [15]. According to the literature, increased bone volume—as seen in our experiment—seems to correlate with blood-vessel volume, which is vital for bone healing [16]. Endothelial proliferation and neovascularisation are enhanced by stimulation of integrin-dependent recruitment of CD34+ progenitor cells to endothelial cells [17]. In particular, proangiogenic acitivities of CYR61 are mediated through integrins αvβ3 and α6β1 in endothelial cells [18, 19]. Recently, angiogenic activity of CYR61 was demonstrated in a rabbit ischemic hindlimb assay [13], which underlines our findings that CYR61 plays a vital role in ischemic tissues, rearranging angiogenetic processes and therefore increasing bone volume. Moreover, CCNs regulate expression and activity of other angiogenic factors, such as VEGF-A and C [20–23]. Apart from hypoxia, CYR61 expression in osteoblasts is enhanced by many chemical mediators, including growth factors such as VEGF and TGF-β, which are present in the callus and are known to directly enhance bone formation [14]. Moreover, the experimentally induced soft-tissue trauma in our experiment and with it the collapse of vascular volumes can lead to local hypoxia [24], resulting in a callus deficiency [9], which explains the smaller callus diaphsis index in the control group but a higher one after local CYR61 treatment. In turn, hypoxia stabilises and activates the transcription factor HIF-1α, one of the key regulators of CYR61 next to TGF-β3 [25]. The HIF and CYR61 pathway is likely to be critically important for the interplay of angio- and osteogenesis and thus for fracture healing and therefore for bone volume. In general, CCN protein expression is associated with injury repair and inflammation [14], which emphasises the natural availability of CYR61 in regenerative processes. Beyond that, local adminstration seems to enhance the endogenous physiological regeneration by slightly increasing callus diaphysis and bone volume, as seen in our experiment.
Biomechanical analysis showed that torsional strength of the newly reconstructed callus was significantly higher in the CYR61 group. At the same time, stiffness was lower. Preservation of a higher density of blood vessels in the consolidation period can lead to better mineralisation of the distracted callus [16], which might increase the stability of the newly reconstructed bone, as in our experiment. Lately, a potential loop consisting of VEGF-mediated up-regulation of CCN1 in osteoblasts that attracts endothelial cells and promotes angiogenesis has been discussed [26]. Aside from that, using an axial-shortening model of the rabbit tibial callus, HIF-1a and VEGF levels increased and were associated with decreases in vascularity around the front of enhanced membranous bone formation [24]. Moreover, it has been postulated that CYR61 contributes to bone healing through its angiogenic potential [27]. It stimulates osteoblast differentiation but inhibits osteoclastogenesis, suggesting a role as a bifunctional regulator that promotes osteogenesis [28] that, on the other hand, might lead to enhanced bone formation. Increased callus resistence is often associated with enhanced bone and tissue volume [29], which confirms our results in respect of torsional strength. Aside from that, findings in the literature also show that a rigid fracture fixation can lead to a stiffer and smaller callus but with better mineralised tissue in the entire callus, compared with a flexible or dynamised fixation [30]. Respectively, we used the same standardised fixation techniques assuming that the significant increase in stability and enlargement of bone volume might result from a faster mineralised callus reconstruct after CYR61 treatment. Coinciding with our findings, another study in a murine fracture model showed that mice receiving sildenafil, which also influences angiogenic growth factor expression and bone formation during fracture healing, had a significantly increased osseous facture bridging [31]. In contrast, they found an increased biomechanical stiffness and a smaller callus area with a slightly reduced amount of cartilaginous tissue. Herein, Western blot analysis showed a significantly higher expression of proangiogenic and osteogenic CYR61 [31]. Corresponding to our results, this might indicate an accelerated healing process underlining the benefit of angiogenic growth factors such as CYR61. In accordance with our results and findings in the literature, callus quality with regard to stability depends on bone volume and torsional strength, among other factors, which was increased in our experiment. Conversely, the size of the newly formed callus must not be associated with stability. Local adminstration of CYR61 seems to increase callus stability while increasing bone volume and callus diaphysis index as an osteogenic regulator.
We recognise limitations to our study. First, experimental studies like ours generally must be cautiously transferred to human clinical practice. There are no clinical data on the use of CYR61 in human musculoskeletal trauma. Second, the high demands of production and the costs of CYR61 might be a limiting factor. Third, we showed a positive effect of CYR61 in rabbit limbs, but it must be emphasised that these tissues are not identical to those in human limbs. The differences by nature in anatomy and physiology in the rabbit bone can mean that the dynamics related to the injury may vary from those in humans. Translation of clinical parameters between models have to be carefully examined, which does not negate the potential clinical importance of our results. Forth, it cannot be excluded that some effects observed in this study were induced by the collagen matrix. Nevertheless, these effects might be negligible, as the matrix is supposed to be inert, biocompatible and biodegradable.
In comparison with other growth factors, such as BMPs, which are well known and in clinical use, not much is known about CYR61. There are no comparable studies pointing out the applicability or feasibility of CYR61 application after musculoskelatal trauma. To elicit the potential of CYR61 and its use, more studies are needed. Our results suggest that CYR61 might promote fracture healing after acute soft-tissue trauma by increasing newly reconstructed bone stability. Thus, CYR61 used locally may prospectively be an effective therapeutic weapon for orthopaedic trauma surgeons dealing with large bone defects and extensive vasculature or soft-tissue damage predisposed to nonunions. We show for the first time that CYR61 positively influences callus regenerate after acute soft-tissue trauma, not only histologically but biomechanically, most probably by a CYR61-associated pathway.
Acknowledgments
We thank Torsten Blunk (PhD) for his support discussing the results, James Ridgley (MD) for critically reviewing the manuscript as a native speaker, and Daniela Keller (Dipl. Math. - statistics) for her excellent support.
Footnotes
One of the authors (SPF) has received financial funding by the IZKF of the University of Wuerzburg.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the animal protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.
References
- 1.Meffert RH, Tis JE, Inoue N, McCarthy EF, Brug E, Chao EY. Primary resective shortening followed by distraction osteogenesis for limb reconstruction: a comparison with simple lengthening. J Orthop Res. 2000;18(4):629–636. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100180416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mollenhoff G, Josten C, Muhr G. Callotaxis--osteogenesis by stretching--a conservative possibility for restoring leg length after post-traumatic primary tibial shortening? Zentralbl Chir. 1997;122(11):970–973. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Betz AM, Hierner R, Baumgart R, Stock W, Sebisch E, Kettler M, Schweiberer L. Primary shortening–secondary lengthening. A new treatment concept for reconstruction of extensive soft tissue and bone injuries after 3rd degree open fracture and amputation of the lower leg. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1998;30(1):30–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Borovecki F, Pecina-Slaus N, Vukicevic S. Biological mechanisms of bone and cartilage remodelling--genomic perspective. Int Orthop. 2007;31(6):799–805. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0408-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ivkovic A, Marijanovic I, Hudetz D, Porter RM, Pecina M, Evans CH. Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering in orthopaedic surgery. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2011;3:923–944. doi: 10.2741/e299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schmid J, Wallkamm B, Hammerle CH, Gogolewski S, Lang NP. The significance of angiogenesis in guided bone regeneration. A case report of a rabbit experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8(3):244–248. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080311.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kolar P, Gaber T, Perka C, Duda GN, Buttgereit F. Human early fracture hematoma is characterized by inflammation and hypoxia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(11):3118–3126. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1865-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Groothuis A, Duda GN, Wilson CJ, Thompson MS, Hunter MR, Simon P, Bail HJ, Scherpenzeel KM, Kasper G. Mechanical stimulation of the pro-angiogenic capacity of human fracture haematoma: involvement of VEGF mechano-regulation. Bone. 2010;47(2):438–444. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meffert RH, Jansen H, Frey SP, Raschke MJ, Langer M. The influence of soft tissue trauma on bone regeneration after acute limb shortening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;460:202–209. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31804a5e12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lienau J, Schell H, Epari DR, Schutze N, Jakob F, Duda GN, Bail HJ. CYR61 (CCN1) protein expression during fracture healing in an ovine tibial model and its relation to the mechanical fixation stability. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(2):254–262. doi: 10.1002/jor.20035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kireeva ML, Mo FE, Yang GP, Lau LF. Cyr61, a product of a growth factor-inducible immediate-early gene, promotes cell proliferation, migration, and adhesion. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16(4):1326–1334. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.4.1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schutze N, Kunzi-Rapp K, Wagemanns R, Noth U, Jatzke S, Jakob F. Expression, purification, and functional testing of recombinant CYR61/CCN1. Protein Expr Purif. 2005;42(1):219–225. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2005.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fataccioli V, Abergel V, Wingertsmann L, Neuville P, Spitz E, Adnot S, Calenda V, Teiger E. Stimulation of angiogenesis by Cyr61 gene: a new therapeutic candidate. Hum Gene Ther. 2002;13(12):1461–1470. doi: 10.1089/10430340260185094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen CC, Lau LF. Functions and mechanisms of action of CCN matricellular proteins. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41(4):771–783. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.07.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Babic AM, Kireeva ML, Kolesnikova TV, Lau LF. CYR61, a product of a growth factor-inducible immediate early gene, promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(11):6355–6360. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ohashi S, Ohnishi I, Kageyama T, Fukuda S, Tsuchiya A, Imai K, Matsuyama J, Nakamura K. Effect of vascularity on canine distracted tibial callus consolidation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;438:253–259. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000167833.93205.cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Grote K, Salguero G, Ballmaier M, Dangers M, Drexler H, Schieffer B. The angiogenic factor CCN1 promotes adhesion and migration of circulating CD34+ progenitor cells: potential role in angiogenesis and endothelial regeneration. Blood. 2007;110(3):877–885. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-036202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Leu SJ, Lam SC, Lau LF. Pro-angiogenic activities of CYR61 (CCN1) mediated through integrins alphavbeta3 and alpha6beta1 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(48):46248–46255. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209288200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen N, Leu SJ, Todorovic V, Lam SC, Lau LF. Identification of a novel integrin alphavbeta3 binding site in CCN1 (CYR61) critical for pro-angiogenic activities in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(42):44166–44176. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406813200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chen CC, Chen N, Lau LF. The angiogenic factors Cyr61 and connective tissue growth factor induce adhesive signaling in primary human skin fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(13):10443–10452. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008087200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ivkovic S, Yoon BS, Popoff SN, Safadi FF, Libuda DE, Stephenson RC, Daluiski A, Lyons KM. Connective tissue growth factor coordinates chondrogenesis and angiogenesis during skeletal development. Development. 2003;130(12):2779–2791. doi: 10.1242/dev.00505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hashimoto G, Inoki I, Fujii Y, Aoki T, Ikeda E, Okada Y. Matrix metalloproteinases cleave connective tissue growth factor and reactivate angiogenic activity of vascular endothelial growth factor 165. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(39):36288–36295. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201674200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dean RA, Butler GS, Hamma-Kourbali Y, Delbe J, Brigstock DR, Courty J, Overall CM. Identification of candidate angiogenic inhibitors processed by matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) in cell-based proteomic screens: disruption of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/heparin affin regulatory peptide (pleiotrophin) and VEGF/Connective tissue growth factor angiogenic inhibitory complexes by MMP-2 proteolysis. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(24):8454–8465. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00821-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mori S, Akagi M, Kikuyama A, Yasuda Y, Hamanishi C. Axial shortening during distraction osteogenesis leads to enhanced bone formation in a rabbit model through the HIF-1alpha/vascular endothelial growth factor system. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(4):653–663. doi: 10.1002/jor.20076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wolf N, Yang W, Dunk CE, Gashaw I, Lye SJ, Ring T, Schmidt M, Winterhager E, Gellhaus A. Regulation of the matricellular proteins CYR61 (CCN1) and NOV (CCN3) by hypoxia-inducible factor-1{alpha} and transforming-growth factor-{beta}3 in the human trophoblast. Endocrinology. 2010;151(6):2835–2845. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Athanasopoulos AN, Schneider D, Keiper T, Alt V, Pendurthi UR, Liegibel UM, Sommer U, Nawroth PP, Kasperk C, Chavakis T. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-induced up-regulation of CCN1 in osteoblasts mediates proangiogenic activities in endothelial cells and promotes fracture healing. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(37):26746–26753. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705200200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chaqour B, Goppelt-Struebe M. Mechanical regulation of the Cyr61/CCN1 and CTGF/CCN2 proteins. FEBS. 2006;J273(16):3639–3649. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05360.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Crockett JC, Schutze N, Tosh D, Jatzke S, Duthie A, Jakob F, Rogers MJ. The matricellular protein CYR61 inhibits osteoclastogenesis by a mechanism independent of alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5. Endocrinology. 2007;148(12):5761–5768. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Habermann B, Kafchitsas K, Olender G, Augat P, Kurth A. Strontium ranelate enhances callus strength more than PTH 1–34 in an osteoporotic rat model of fracture healing. Calcif Tissue Int. 2010;86(1):82–89. doi: 10.1007/s00223-009-9317-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Claes L, Blakytny R, Gockelmann M, Schoen M, Ignatius A, Willie B. Early dynamization by reduced fixation stiffness does not improve fracture healing in a rat femoral osteotomy model. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(1):22–27. doi: 10.1002/jor.20712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Histing T, Marciniak K, Scheuer C, Garcia P, Holstein JH, Klein M, Matthys R, Pohlemann T, Menger MD. Sildenafil accelerates fracture healing in mice. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(6):867–873. doi: 10.1002/jor.21324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



