Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012 Sep 11;24(5):600–606. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.08.011

Inside-out, outside-in, and inside-outside-in: G protein signaling in integrin-mediated cell adhesion, spreading, and retraction

Bo Shen 1, M Keegan Delaney 1, Xiaoping Du 1
PMCID: PMC3479359  NIHMSID: NIHMS404335  PMID: 22980731

Abstract

The integrin family of cell adhesion receptors mediates bi-directional signaling: “inside-out” signaling activates the ligand binding function of integrins and “outside-in” signaling mediates cellular responses induced by ligand binding to integrins leading to cell spreading, retraction, migration, and proliferation. Integrin signaling requires both heterotrimeric G proteins and monomeric small G proteins. This review focuses on recent development in the roles of G proteins in integrin outside-in signaling. The finding of direct interaction between the heterotrimeric G protein subunit Gα13 and integrin β subunits reveals a new mechanism for integrin signaling, and also uncovers a crosstalk between the signaling pathways initiated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and integrins. This crosstalk, which may be referred to as “inside-outside-in” signaling, dynamically regulates contractility and greatly promotes integrin outside-in signaling

Introduction

The integrin family of heterodimeric cell adhesion receptors not only plays an important role in mediating cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM), but also in signal transduction [1]. Integrins transmit signals bidirectionally. Intracellular signals initiate so-called “inside-out signaling” by inducing the binding of talin and kindlin to the cytoplasmic domains of integrin β subunits, which activate the ligand binding function of integrins [25]. Conversely, the interaction between integrins and their various ligands induces “outside-in” signals across the membrane, allowing the cell to sense the extracellular environment and react correspondingly [6,7]. Integrin outside-in signaling induces cell spreading, retraction, migration, proliferation, and survival. G proteins (guanine nucleotide-binding proteins) play critical roles in mediating integrin inside-out and outside-in signaling. The roles of G proteins in inside-out signaling have been excellently reviewed elsewhere [5,8]. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms whereby G proteins regulate outside-in signaling (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. G protein-dependent outside-in signaling pathways regulating cell spreading and retraction.

Figure 1

This is a simplified schematic emphasizing the roles of G proteins and their regulators in cell spreading and retraction.

G proteins are GTPases (guanosine triphosphatases) that cycle between a GDP-bound form and a GTP-bound form. The GTP-bound G protein is an active form that interacts with downstream effectors and transmits signals, during which the bound GTP is often hydrolyzed to GDP and the G protein recycles into the inactive GDP-bound form. The activity of G proteins is regulated mainly through three classes of regulatory proteins: GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), guanine nucleotide-exchange factors (GEFs), and guanine nucleotide-dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) [9,10]. GAPs promote the intrinsic GTPase activity of G proteins accelerating their conversion to the inactive GDP-bound form. Activation of G proteins requires exchange of bound GDP with GTP, a process facilitated by GEFs and inhibited by GDIs. According to their structures and molecular masses, there are monomeric small G proteins and heterotrimeric G proteins. Of the monomeric small G proteins, we focus on the roles of the Rho family of small GTPases, such as members of the Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 subfamilies, respectively [9]. Heterotrimeric G proteins are composed of three subunits, α, β and γ. The α subunit binds to guanine nucleotides. Heterotrimeric G proteins are typically activated by G protein-coupled receptors with 7 transmembrane domains (GPCRs). Upon activation, the GTP-bound α subunit dissociates from β/γ subunits, and serves as the major signaling messenger by interacting with its signal acceptors (downstream effectors) [11]. Here we review recent progress and emerging concepts on the roles and regulatory mechanisms of G proteins in integrin signaling leading to cell spreading and retraction.

Heterotrimeric G protein subunit Gα13 mediates integrin outside-in signaling

Various isoforms of heterotrimeric G proteins, such as Gq/11 and Gi/o, are important in initiating “inside-out” signaling, activating the ligand binding function of integrins [5,12]. Deletion of the Gα13 gene in mice, however, only partially reduces integrin-mediated platelet aggregation in response to low concentrations of GPCR agonists, suggesting that its primary role is in the secondary amplification response to integrin activation [13]. We recently showed that Gα13 directly binds to the cytoplasmic domain of integrin β subunits, including β1 and β3 [14]. The integrin binding site is located within switch region I (SRI) of Gα13, which is also the binding site for the Gα13 effector p115RhoGEF. Therefore, The competitive inhibition of p115RhoGEF-Ga13 interaction is a possible mechanism contributing to integrin-mediated negative regulation of Rho signaling pathway. Although GDP-bound Gα13 is able to interact with integrins, the Gα13–integrin interaction is significantly greater when Gα13 is activated. Importantly, this interaction is induced by integrin ligation [14]. Thus, Gα13-integrin interaction is dually regulated by integrin ligands and GPCR signaling. The importance of Gα13 in integrin outside-in signaling was revealed by the data that suppression of Gα13 expression or inhibition of the Gα13 SRI binding site results in inhibition of integrin-dependent activation of Src family kinases (SFK) (an established key player in integrin outside-in signaling), and diminished integrin-dependent cell spreading, a phenotype similar to that observed with inhibition of SFKs [1419]. Thus, it appears that Gα13 mediates integrin signaling and cell spreading by stimulating the activation of SFKs. Thus far, this is the earliest identified step of outside-in signaling following integrin ligation and clustering. The short cytoplasmic domain of integrin β subunits interacts with several intracellular molecules, including talin, kindlins and c-Src. It remains to be shown how the binding of Gα13 and other signaling molecules to integrin β subunits are coordinated during integrin signaling.

The roles of Rho and Rac in integrin-mediated cell retraction

The binding of ECM ligands to integrins initiates outside-in signaling, leading to complex cellular responses that vary in different cell types. However, integrin-mediated cell spreading and subsequent retraction are common to nearly all cell types. In migratory cells, coordinated spreading in the leading edge and retraction in the rear drive cell migration on the ECM [20]. Cell retraction requires a retractile force generated by actin-myosin interaction and can be defined as the inward movement of cell membranes and the associated cytoskeleton. When cells are imbedded in flexible tissues and gel-like matrices, cell retraction causes these tissues or gel-like matrices to shrink, as in the cases of wound healing and clot retraction. On rigid surfaces, retraction of actin-myosin complexes results in the formation of stress fibers. In non-muscle cells, actin-myosin-dependent retractile forces are stimulated by phosphorylation of myosin light chain (MLC), which can be mediated by MLC kinase (MLCK) and downregulated by MLC phosphatase (MLCP). GTP-bound Rho activates its downstream effector Rho-kinase (ROCK), which subsequently induces phosphorylation and inhibition of MLCP [21], culminating in the generation of a retractile force. Members of the Rho subfamily of small GTPases also interact with different isoforms of formins, which facilitate actin polymerization and formation of stress fibers [22,23]. Three highly homologous Rho isoforms, RhoA, RhoB and RhoC, activate ROCK and retractile forces. However, these different Rho isoforms may play different roles in cells, as they differ in subcellular localization, regulator and effector specificity [2224]. Integrin ligation dynamically regulates Rho activity. During the early phase of cell spreading, Rho activity is transiently downregulated probably via Src-dependent phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP [18,25,26], but is later activated [18]. A recent study shows that tensional force applied to ligated integrins induces SFK Fyn-dependent activation of leukemia-associated Rho GEF (LARG) and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)- and focal adhesion kinase (FAK)-enhanced activation of GEF-H1 [27], both of which activate RhoA.

Interestingly, Rac, which antagonizes RhoA-dependent MLC phosphorylation in some cell types [28], is important in stimulating integrin-dependent MLC phosphorylation and cell retraction in other cell types [29]. In platelets, Rac1 stimulates the activation of the MAPK pathway, leading to increased phosphorylation of MLC and clot retraction [29]. Platelet-mediated clot retraction is totally abolished only when both Rac1 and RhoA are inhibited [29]. Thus, Rho and Rac play co-operative or synergistic roles in mediating cell retraction in this system.

The roles of Rho family small G proteins in integrin-dependent cell spreading

Integrin-dependent cell spreading is characterized by the outward movement of cell membranes and the underlying cytoskeletal structure (as opposed to cell retraction), where cells adherent on integrin ligands put forth extensions to contact the surface and form new integrin-dependent adhesions. Cell spreading involves visually distinct morphological changes of cell membranes including waves of protrusions, filopodial extensions, and lamellipodia. A pioneer study using microinjection of recombinant proteins demonstrated that Cdc42 mediates filopodia formation, Rac mediates lamellipodia formation, and Rho is important in stress fiber formation [30]. The roles of Rac and Cdc42 in cell spreading have been supported by numerous subsequent studies, although there is a recent controversy with respect to whether blood platelets are able to form filopodia and spread normally on integrin ligands in the absence of Cdc42 [31,32]. GTP-loaded Rho has also been observed at the leading edge of membrane protrusions in migrating cells, about 2 μm in front of where activated Rac and Cdc42 is located [33]. RhoC appears to interact with the formin isoform FMNL3 and restrict the broadening of lamellipodia [23]. RhoA may regulate Rac activity to restrict over-extension of the cell [23]. Interestingly, cycles of membrane protrusion and retraction occur locally in the leading edge of spreading cells. A study suggests that the function of RhoA in regulating clock rhythm of protrusion waves is controlled by PKA phosphorylation of RhoA at Ser188 and consequent increase in its GDI affinity [34]. Nevertheless, even though Rho may play an important role during the normal process of cell spreading and migration, Rho isoforms do not seem to be required for cell spreading. In fact, inhibition of Rho by siRNA knockdown, dominant negative mutants, or pharmacological inhibitors leads to accelerated or increased cell spreading [14,18,23,35]. Also, RhoA is transiently inhibited during the early phase of cell spreading [14,18,25,35,36]. These studies suggest that Rho-mediated contraction may serve to limit cell spreading.

Cell spreading is associated with small G protein-mediated waves of actin polymerization in filopodia and lamellipodia. It has been presumed that actin polymerization is required for cell spreading; however, there has been evidence indicating that actin polymerization does not directly cause cell spreading, particularly the early phase of cell spreading. A study on the physical properties of cell spreading dynamics suggest that the dynamics of cell spreading follows a universal power-law behavior, and can be modeled as a viscous adhesive cortical shell (membrane and associated cytoskeleton) enclosing a less viscous interior (cytosol) [37]. Inhibition of actin polymerization with cytochalasin D accelerates cell spreading, suggesting that actin polymerization may not be required for cell spreading but may serve as a constraint [37]. Consistently, although Rac and Rho both facilitate actin polymerization, Rac and Rho play opposing roles during integrin-dependent cell spreading. In this respect, Rac induces phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP and inhibition of RhoA, directly or indirectly via a ROS-dependent mechanism, and this function is important in promoting cell spreading [3840]. Another mechanism whereby Rac suppresses Rho activity is via its effector PAK, which phosphorylates and inactivates p115RhoGEF, a RhoGEF known to be important in stimulating GPCR-mediated RhoA activity [41].

The activity of Rac is stimulated during integrin outside-in signaling. SFK activation has been proposed to be a mechanism linking integrin ligation with downstream activation of small GTPases [16,42,43]. SFKs, particularly c-Src, have been shown to directly or indirectly mediate phosphorylation and activation of various GEFs for Rac, including Vav1 [42], Vav2 [44], and DOCK180 [45]. In platelets Src-dependent activation of Vav1 is mediated through the tyrosine kinase Syk [16,42]. A recent report also suggests that ribosome protein S6 kinase (S6K1) and its upstream regulator mTOR play a role in stimulating Src-dependent activation of Rac1 through association with the Rac1-GEF Tiam1 [43]. In addition, there is also evidence that integrin-mediated activation of other GEFs, such as α- and β-PIX, may be important in Rac activation in cells spreading on integrin ligands [46,47].

Switch between integrin-mediated cell spreading and retraction

Upon cell adhesion to integrin ligands, cells spread and retract. In polarized cell movement, cell spreading mainly occurs in the leading edge, while retraction dominates in the rear. Clearly, some molecular mechanisms must exist to allow a cell to switch its response to integrin outside-in signaling from spreading to retraction. Such a switch mechanism has been characterized for β3 integrins (Fig. 2): following the binding of extracellular ligands to integrin αIIbβ3, Gα13-β3 interaction and consequent activation of β3-bound c-Src induces c-Src-dependent inhibition of RhoA [14,18]. This process is required for cell spreading. c-Src also phosphorylates β3 at Y747 and Y759 [48], protecting β3 from cleavage by calpain [49], a calcium-dependent protease. Following cell spreading, dephosphorylation of Y759 and consequent cleavage of β3 by calpain at Y759 removes the c-Src-binding site thus abolishing c-Src-mediated inhibition of RhoA, allowing subsequent activation of RhoA-dependent contractile signaling and cell retraction [18,50]. Cell spreading mediated by other integrin subtypes, such as β1 integrin, also requires transient inhibition of RhoA via SFK-dependent activation of p190RhoGAP [26,35,51]. However, c-Src does not appear to directly bind to the C-terminal sequence of β1 [52] but rather can be recruited to the integrin-focal adhesion complex by FAK, which is implicated in β1-dependent activation of Src [53]. Thus, although calpain activity is also important in β1-dependent cell migration on matrix proteins [54], it is possible that the exact molecular mechanisms regulating the “switch” from spreading to retraction are different amongst integrin subtypes.

Figure 2. Dynamic regulation of Rho by GPCRs and integrins.

Figure 2

A. GPCR agonists (such as thrombin) stimulate the activation of Gα13 and Gα13-dependent activation of RhoGEFs (such as p115 RhoGEF), leading to Rho activation and cell contraction. GPCRs also initiate inside-out signaling to activate integrins. B. Following ligand binding to integrins, GPCR-activated Gα13 binds to integrin β subunits, which inhibits Rho activity by Src-dependent activation of p190RhoGAP and by competitive inhibition of Gα13-RhoGEF interaction. Inhibition of Rho facilitates cell spreading probably by relieving the constraint of retractile forces. Cleavage of integrin β3 by calpain abolishes β3-Src association and thus Src-dependent inhibition of Rho. Tensional force on integrins also activates RhoGEFs. These events lead to reactivation of Rho and cell retraction [14].

Crosstalk between GPCR signaling and integrin outside-in signaling

The discovery of an important role for Gα13-integrin interaction in outside-in signaling also reveals that a crosstalk exists linking the GPCR signaling pathway and the integrin outside-in signaling pathway. This crosstalk is distinct from the established role of GPCR pathways in stimulating integrin inside-out signaling. There are two distinct aspects of the crosstalk. First, GPCRs mediate the activation of Gα13, and thus stimulates Gα13 binding to integrin β subunits. This provides a molecular mechanism whereby the GPCR-Gα13 pathway directly enhances integrin outside-in signaling (Fig 3)[14]. Secondly, Gα13 binding to integrin β subunits negatively regulates GPCR-stimulated activation of RhoA. Interestingly, GPCR-stimulated RhoA activation is also mediated by GTP-bound Gα13, which activates p115 RhoGEF [55,56]. However, initial GPCR/Gα13-mediated activation of RhoA is transient [14]. While the mechanism inducing the downregulation of RhoA activity following initial GPCR activation was previously unclear, the discovery of the binding of Gα13 to the cytoplasmic domain of integrin following integrin ligation provides a plausible mechanism for the dynamic regulation of RhoA activity (Fig. 2) [14]. The binding of Gα13 to integrin induces the activation of SFKs, which suppress the activity of RhoA by activating p190RhoGAP [26,35]. In addition, the integrin binding site on Gα13 is located within switch region I, the same site that also interacts with RhoGEFs [14,57]. Thus, integrin binding to Gα13 should competitively block Gα13-p115 RhoGEF interaction. Therefore, the crosstalk between the Gα13-coupled GPCR pathway and the integrin outside-in signaling pathway, together with the above-mentioned calpain-dependent switch mechanism, forms an ideal regulatory system that controls Rho-dependent contractility and coordinates cell spreading and retraction (Fig. 2).

Figure 3. Inside-outside-in signaling.

Figure 3

GPCR/Gα13-dependent signals inside a cell converge with integrin ligand-induced outside-in signal to stimulate cellular responses by inducing Gα13-integrin interaction.

Conclusions

Integrin outside-in signaling requires both the heterotrimeric G protein Gα13 and monomeric small G proteins to mediate cell spreading, retraction, and migration. Gα13 plays a dual role in the process of integrin outside-in signaling. It mediates integrin outside-in signaling and integrin-dependent regulation of small G proteins, particularly Rho. It is also required for the crosstalk between the GPCR signaling pathway and the integrin outside-in signaling pathway. In the latter case, integrin serves as an effector for the GPCR-Gα13 signaling pathway. Thus, it appears that, in addition to the inside-out signaling and outside-in signaling of integrins, there is a third integrin signaling pathway that coordinates cell spreading and retraction: the “inside-outside-in”signaling pathway (Fig. 3). In this pathway, GPCR-induced intracellular (inside) signals greatly enhance integrin outside-in signaling to stimulate cellular responses independent of the inside-out signaling pathway. The mechanism whereby Gα13 stimulates integrin-dependent activation of SFKs remains unclear. Likewise, the complex networking of the small GTPases and their regulators remains to be fully elucidated. Further studies on the roles of G proteins in integrin-dependent cell adhesion, spreading, retraction, and migration will help to shed light on the intriguing and complex signaling networks regulating these fundamentally important cellular processes.

Table 1.

G proteins Involved in Integrin Outside-in Signaling

G protein Function
RhoA Actomyosin contraction and actin polymerization [21,30,58]
RhoB/RhoC Similar to RhoA but different localization and specificity for formin isoforms [23,24]
RhoG Potential Rac activator [59,60]
RhoH Potential Rac inhibitor [61]
Rnd Rearrangement of actin cytoskeleton [62]
Rif Filopodia formation through formin [63]
Rac1 Lamellipodia, activation of PAK and MAPK pathways [29,30,64]
Cdc42 filopodia formation and activation of PAK pathway [30,64,65]
Ras Gene regulation, proliferaction, and apoptosis through MAPK pathway [66]
Gα13 Src activation and RhoA regulation [14]

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by grants from NHLBI, HL080264 and HL062350 (X.D.). MKD is a recipient of the American Heart Association Midwest Affiliate Predoctoral Fellowship Award.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell. 2002;110:673–687. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00971-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tadokoro S, Shattil SJ, Eto K, Tai V, Liddington RC, de Pereda JM, Ginsberg MH, Calderwood DA. Talin binding to integrin beta tails: A final common step in integrin activation. Science. 2003;302:103–106. doi: 10.1126/science.1086652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moser M, Nieswandt B, Ussar S, Pozgajova M, Fassler R. Kindlin-3 is essential for integrin activation and platelet aggregation. Nature Medicine. 2008;14:325–330. doi: 10.1038/nm1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ma YQ, Qin J, Wu CY, Plow EF. Kindlin-2 (Mig-2): a co-activator of beta(3) integrins. Journal of Cell Biology. 2008;181:439–446. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200710196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim C, Ye F, Ginsberg MH. Regulation of integrin activation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011;27:321–345. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ginsberg MH, Partridge A, Shattil SJ. Integrin regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005;17:509–516. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Legate KR, Wickstrom SA, Fassler R. Genetic and cell biological analysis of integrin outside-in signaling. Genes Dev. 2009;23:397–418. doi: 10.1101/gad.1758709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Offermanns S. Activation of platelet function through G protein-coupled receptors. Circulation Research. 2006;99:1293–1304. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000251742.71301.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jaffe AB, Hall A. Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:247–269. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.020604.150721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Guilluy C, Garcia-Mata R, Burridge K. Rho protein crosstalk: another social network? Trends in Cell Biology. 2011;21:718–726. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Neves SR, Ram PT, Iyengar R. G protein pathways. Science. 2002;296:1636–1639. doi: 10.1126/science.1071550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li ZY, Delaney MK, O’Brien KA, Du X. Signaling During Platelet Adhesion and Activation. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology. 2010;30:2341–2349. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moers A, Nieswandt B, Massberg S, Wettschureck N, Gruner S, Konrad I, Schulte V, Aktas B, Gratacap MP, Simon MI, et al. G13 is an essential mediator of platelet activation in hemostasis and thrombosis. Nat Med. 2003;9:1418–1422. doi: 10.1038/nm943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **14.Gong H, Shen B, Flevaris P, Chow C, Lam SC, Voyno-Yasenetskaya TA, Kozasa T, Du X. G protein subunit Galpha13 binds to integrin alphaIIbbeta3 and mediates integrin “outside-in” signaling. Science. 2010;327:340–343. doi: 10.1126/science.1174779. The auhors demonstrated a direct interaction between the integrin β3 cytoplasmic domain and Gα13, and an important role for this interaction in mediating integrin outside-in signaling. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Klinghoffer RA, Sachsenmaier C, Cooper JA, Soriano P. Src family kinases are required for integrin but not PDGFR signal transduction. EMBO J. 1999;18:2459–2471. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.9.2459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Obergfell A, Eto K, Mocsai A, Buensuceso C, Moores SL, Brugge JS, Lowell CA, Shattil SJ. Coordinate interactions of Csk, Src, and Syk kinases with [alpha]IIb[beta]3 initiate integrin signaling to the cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol. 2002;157:265–275. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200112113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Inoue O, Suzuki-Inoue K, Dean WL, Frampton J, Watson SP. Integrin alpha2beta1 mediates outside-in regulation of platelet spreading on collagen through activation of Src kinases and PLCgamma2. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:769–780. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200208043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Flevaris P, Stojanovic A, Gong H, Chishti A, Welch E, Du X. A molecular switch that controls cell spreading and retraction. J Cell Biol. 2007;179:553–565. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200703185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reddy KB, Smith DM, Plow EF. Analysis of Fyn function in hemostasis and alphaIIbbeta3-integrin signaling. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:1641–1648. doi: 10.1242/jcs.014076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moissoglu K, Schwartz MA. Integrin signalling in directed cell migration. Biol Cell. 2006;98:547–555. doi: 10.1042/BC20060025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kimura K, Ito M, Amano M, Chihara K, Fukata Y, Nakafuku M, Yamamori B, Feng J, Nakano T, Okawa K, et al. Regulation of myosin phosphatase by Rho and Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase) Science. 1996;273:245–248. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5272.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kitzing TM, Wang Y, Pertz O, Copeland JW, Grosse R. Formin-like 2 drives amoeboid invasive cell motility downstream of RhoC. Oncogene. 2010;29:2441–2448. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **23.Vega FM, Fruhwirth G, Ng T, Ridley AJ. RhoA and RhoC have distinct roles in migration and invasion by acting through different targets. J Cell Biol. 2011;193:655–665. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201011038. The authors show that RhoA and RhoC interact with different targets and their depletion causes overspreading of cells towards distinct directions. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wheeler AP, Ridley AJ. Why three Rho proteins? RhoA, RhoB, RhoC, and cell motility. Exp Cell Res. 2004;301:43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ren XD, Kiosses WB, Schwartz MA. Regulation of the small GTP-binding protein Rho by cell adhesion and the cytoskeleton. EMBO J. 1999;18:578–585. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.3.578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Arthur WT, Petch LA, Burridge K. Integrin engagement suppresses RhoA activity via a c-Src-dependent mechanism. Curr Biol. 2000;10:719–722. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00537-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **27.Guilluy C, Swaminathan V, Garcia-Mata R, O’Brien ET, Superfine R, Burridge K. The Rho GEFs LARG and GEF-H1 regulate the mechanical response to force on integrins. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:722–727. doi: 10.1038/ncb2254. The authors report that application of tensional forces on integrins induces activation of the Rho GEFs LARG and GEF-H1. LARG activation is dependent on the SFK Fyn, while GEF-H1 activation involves ERK, FAK and Ras. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sanz-Moreno V, Gadea G, Ahn J, Paterson H, Marra P, Pinner S, Sahai E, Marshall CJ. Rac activation and inactivation control plasticity of tumor cell movement. Cell. 2008;135:510–523. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *29.Flevaris P, Li Z, Zhang G, Zheng Y, Liu J, Du X. Two distinct roles of mitogen-activated protein kinases in platelets and a novel Rac1-MAPK-dependent integrin outside-in retractile signaling pathway. Blood. 2009;113:893–901. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-155978. The data presented in this report indicate that Rac and Rho have cooperative roles in mediating integrin-dependent contractile signaling. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ridley AJ, Hall A. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell. 1992;70:389–399. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90163-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *31.Pleines I, Eckly A, Elvers M, Hagedorn I, Eliautou S, Bender M, Wu X, Lanza F, Gachet C, Brakebusch C, et al. Multiple alterations of platelet functions dominated by increased secretion in mice lacking Cdc42 in platelets. Blood. 2010;115:3364–3373. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-09-242271. Using platelet specific, Pf4-Cre-driven Cdc42 conditional knockout mice, this report shows that a lack of Cdc42 in mouse platelets did not negatively affect platelet filopodia formation or spreading on the integrin ligand fibrinogen, but enhanced platelet secretion and aggregation. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *32.Akbar H, Shang X, Perveen R, Berryman M, Funk K, Johnson JF, Tandon NN, Zheng Y. Gene targeting implicates Cdc42 GTPase in GPVI and non-GPVI mediated platelet filopodia formation, secretion and aggregation. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022117. Contrary to Ref 31, this report showed defective filopodia formation and spreading in Cdc42-deficient platelets, using Mx1-Cre-driven conditional Cdc42 knockout mice. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Machacek M, Hodgson L, Welch C, Elliott H, Pertz O, Nalbant P, Abell A, Johnson GL, Hahn KM, Danuser G. Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion. Nature. 2009;461:99–103. doi: 10.1038/nature08242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **34.Tkachenko E, Sabouri-Ghomi M, Pertz O, Kim C, Gutierrez E, Machacek M, Groisman A, Danuser G, Ginsberg MH. Protein kinase A governs a RhoA-RhoGDI protrusion-retraction pacemaker in migrating cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:660–667. doi: 10.1038/ncb2231. This report demonstrates that the waves of membrane protrusion that occur in the leading edge of cells are controlled by PKA-dependent phosphorylation of RhoGDI. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Arthur WT, Burridge K. RhoA inactivation by p190RhoGAP regulates cell spreading and migration by promoting membrane protrusion and polarity. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:2711–2720. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.9.2711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ren XD, Kiosses WB, Sieg DJ, Otey CA, Schlaepfer DD, Schwartz MA. Focal adhesion kinase suppresses Rho activity to promote focal adhesion turnover. J Cell Sci. 2000;113 (Pt 20):3673–3678. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.20.3673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *37.Cuvelier D, Thery M, Chu YS, Dufour S, Thiery JP, Bornens M, Nassoy P, Mahadevan L. The universal dynamics of cell spreading. Curr Biol. 2007;17:694–699. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.058. This paper presents an interesting model on the physical property of spreading cells, implicating the restraining role of actin filamental structure during early spreading. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sander EE, ten Klooster JP, van Delft S, van der Kammen RA, Collard JG. Rac downregulates Rho activity: reciprocal balance between both GTPases determines cellular morphology and migratory behavior. J Cell Biol. 1999;147:1009–1022. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.5.1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nimnual AS, Taylor LJ, Bar-Sagi D. Redox-dependent downregulation of Rho by Rac. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:236–241. doi: 10.1038/ncb938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bustos RI, Forget MA, Settleman JE, Hansen SH. Coordination of Rho and Rac GTPase Function via p190B RhoGAP. Current Biology. 2008;18:1606–1611. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rosenfeldt H, Castellone MD, Randazzo PA, Gutkind JS. Rac inhibits thrombin-induced Rho activation: evidence of a Pak-dependent GTPase crosstalk. J Mol Signal. 2006;1:8. doi: 10.1186/1750-2187-1-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Miranti CK, Leng L, Maschberger P, Brugge JS, Shattil SJ. Identification of a novel integrin signaling pathway involving the kinase Syk and the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Vav1. Curr Biol. 1998;8:1289–1299. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00559-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Aslan JE, Tormoen GW, Loren CP, Pang J, McCarty OJ. S6K1 and mTOR regulate Rac1-driven platelet activation and aggregation. Blood. 2011;118:3129–3136. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-331579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Marignani PA, Carpenter CL. Vav2 is required for cell spreading. Journal of Cell Biology. 2001;154:177–186. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200103134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *45.Feng H, Hu B, Liu KW, Li Y, Lu X, Cheng T, Yiin JJ, Lu S, Keezer S, Fenton T, et al. Activation of Rac1 by Src-dependent phosphorylation of Dock180(Y1811) mediates PDGFRalpha-stimulated glioma tumorigenesis in mice and humans. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:4670–4684. doi: 10.1172/JCI58559. The authors provide evidence that Rac1 is activated via Src-dependent phosphorylation of the Rac GEF, Dock180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 46.Filipenko NR, Attwell S, Roskelley C, Dedhar S. Integrin-linked kinase activity regulates Rac- and Cdc42-mediated actin cytoskeleton reorganization via alpha-PIX. Oncogene. 2005;24:5837–5849. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.ten Klooster JP, Jaffer ZM, Chernoff J, Hordijk PL. Targeting and activation of Rac1 are mediated by the exchange factor beta-Pix. J Cell Biol. 2006;172:759–769. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200509096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Law DA, DeGuzman FR, Heiser P, Ministri-Madrid K, Killeen N, Phillips DR. Integrin cytoplasmic tyrosine motif is required for outside-in alphaIIbbeta3 signalling and platelet function. Nature. 1999;401:808–811. doi: 10.1038/44599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Xi X, Flevaris P, Stojanovic A, Chishti A, Phillips DR, Lam SC, Du X. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the integrin beta 3 subunit regulates beta 3 cleavage by calpain. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:29426–29430. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C600039200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ablooglu AJ, Kang J, Petrich BG, Ginsberg MH, Shattil SJ. Antithrombotic effects of targeting alphaIIbbeta3 signaling in platelets. Blood. 2009;113:3585–3592. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-180687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schober M, Raghavan S, Nikolova M, Polak L, Pasolli HA, Beggs HE, Reichardt LF, Fuchs E. Focal adhesion kinase modulates tension signaling to control actin and focal adhesion dynamics. J Cell Biol. 2007;176:667–680. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200608010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Arias-Salgado EG, Lizano S, Sarkar S, Brugge JS, Ginsberg MH, Shattil SJ. Src kinase activation by direct interaction with the integrin beta cytoplasmic domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:13298–13302. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2336149100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Schaller MD, Hildebrand JD, Shannon JD, Fox JW, Vines RR, Parsons JT. Autophosphorylation of the focal adhesion kinase, pp125FAK, directs SH2-dependent binding of pp60src. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:1680–1688. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.3.1680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Huttenlocher A, Palecek SP, Lu Q, Zhang W, Mellgren RL, Lauffenburger DA, Ginsberg MH, Horwitz AF. Regulation of cell migration by the calcium-dependent protease calpain. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:32719–32722. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.52.32719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kozasa T, Jiang X, Hart MJ, Sternweis PM, Singer WD, Gilman AG, Bollag G, Sternweis PC. p115 RhoGEF, a GTPase activating protein for Galpha12 and Galpha13. Science. 1998;280:2109–2111. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5372.2109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hart MJ, Jiang X, Kozasa T, Roscoe W, Singer WD, Gilman AG, Sternweis PC, Bollag G. Direct stimulation of the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of p115 RhoGEF by Galpha13. Science. 1998;280:2112–2114. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5372.2112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nakamura S, Kreutz B, Tanabe S, Suzuki N, Kozasa T. Critical role of lysine 204 in switch I region of Galpha13 for regulation of p115RhoGEF and leukemia-associated RhoGEF. Mol Pharmacol. 2004;66:1029–1034. doi: 10.1124/mol.104.002287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Watanabe N, Madaule P, Reid T, Ishizaki T, Watanabe G, Kakizuka A, Saito Y, Nakao K, Jockusch BM, Narumiya S. p140mDia, a mammalian homolog of Drosophila diaphanous, is a target protein for Rho small GTPase and is a ligand for profilin. EMBO J. 1997;16:3044–3056. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.11.3044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Katoh H, Negishi M. RhoG activates Rac1 by direct interaction with the Dock180-binding protein Elmo. Nature. 2003;424:461–464. doi: 10.1038/nature01817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Meller J, Vidali L, Schwartz MA. Endogenous RhoG is dispensable for integrin-mediated cell spreading but contributes to Rac-independent migration. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:1981–1989. doi: 10.1242/jcs.025130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cherry LK, Li XY, Schwab P, Lim B, Klickstein LB. RhoH is required to maintain the integrin LFA-1 in a nonadhesive state on lymphocytes. Nature Immunology. 2004;5:961–967. doi: 10.1038/ni1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nobes CD, Lauritzen I, Mattei MG, Paris S, Hall A, Chardin P. A new member of the Rho family, Rnd1, promotes disassembly of actin filament structures and loss of cell adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1998;141:187–197. doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.1.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Pellegrin S, Mellor H. The Rho family GTPase Rif induces filopodia through mDia2. Curr Biol. 2005;15:129–133. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sells MA, Knaus UG, Bagrodia S, Ambrose DM, Bokoch GM, Chernoff J. Human p21-activated kinase (Pak1) regulates actin organization in mammalian cells. Curr Biol. 1997;7:202–210. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(97)70091-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Price LS, Leng J, Schwartz MA, Bokoch GM. Activation of Rac and Cdc42 by integrins mediates cell spreading. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9:1863–1871. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.7.1863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Schlaepfer DD, Hanks SK, Hunter T, van der Geer P. Integrin-mediated signal transduction linked to Ras pathway by GRB2 binding to focal adhesion kinase. Nature. 1994;372:786–791. doi: 10.1038/372786a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES