Abstract
Upon secretion, transforming growth factor (TGF) β is maintained in a sequestered state in extracellular matrix as a latent form. The latent TGFβ is considered as a molecular sensor that releases active TGFβ in response to the perturbations of the extracellular matrix at the situations of mechanical stress, wound repair, tissue injury, and inflammation. The biological implication of the temporal discontinuity of TGFβ storage in the matrix and its activation is obscure. Here, using several animal models in which latent TGFβ is activated in vascular matrix in response to injury of arteries, we show that active TGFβ controls the mobilization and recruitment of (messenchymal stem cells) MSCs to participate in tissue repair and remodeling. MSCs were mobilized into the peripheral blood in response to vascular injury and recruited to the injured sites where they gave rise to both endothelial cells for reendothelialization and myofibroblastic cells to form thick neointima. TGFβ were activated in the vascular matrix in both rat and mouse models of mechanical injury of arteries. Importantly, the active TGFβ released from the injured vessels is essential to induce the migration of MSCs, and cascade expression of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) stimulated by TGFβ amplifies the signal for migration. Moreover, sustained high levels of active TGFβ were observed in peripheral blood, and at the same time points following injury, Sca1+CD29+CD11b−CD45− MSCs, in which 91% are nestin+ cells, were mobilized to peripheral blood and recruited to the remodeling arteries. Intravenously injection of recombinant active TGFβ1 in uninjured mice rapidly mobilized MSCs into circulation. Further, inhibitor of TGFβ type I receptor (TβRI) blocked the mobilization and recruitment of MSCs to the injured arteries. Thus, TGFβ is an injury-activated messenger essential for the mobilization and recruitment of MSCs to participate in tissue repair/remodeling.
Keywords: TGFβ activation, mesenchymal stem cells, cell mobilization, vascular remodeling
INTRODUCTION
Adult stem/progenitor cells including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) not only have the ability to differentiate into many cell types but also can be recruited to the sites of injury where they either repair the injured tissue or contribute to tissue remodeling 1–5. In particular, the circulating MSCs in peripheral blood are increased under many circumstances, such as myocardial infarction, chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy, pulmonary fibrosis, hypoxic stress, tissue injury, and these cells can be integrated into the repairing/remodeling tissues 6–13. It is believed that pro-migratory factor(s) released from injured tissue or surrounding inflammatory cells create a gradient locally to mediate the migration of stem cells from peripheral blood or surrounding tissue to the injury sites 14–17. These migratory factor(s) may also diffuse into circulation. The high blood concentration of the factor(s) outside of the stem cell niche may lead to the mobilization of the cells from their original niche into peripheral blood. Many growth factors and cytokines have been found to regulate the mobilization of HSCs and EPCs. These factors include colony-stimulating factors (CSFs), stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), erythropoietin, angiopoietin-2, fibroblast growth factor (FGF), stem cell factor (SCF), and interleukin 8 (IL-8)14,15. However, the primary endogenous factor(s) activated or released from vascular cells, vascular matrix or surrounding inflammatory cells in response to injury to stimulate the mobilization of MSCs are largely unknown.
Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ), consists of three isoforms: TGFβ1, 2, and 3, regulates a broad spectrum of biological processes. Excessive TGFβ activation is a major contributor to a variety of diseases including cancer, autoimmune diseases, vascular diseases and progressive fibrosis in multiple organs. TGFβs are synthesized as latent form in a complex that is maintained in a sequestered state in extracellular matrix (ECM) 18,19, thereby preventing the release of free TGFβ for its action, a process called latent TGFβ activation. Thus, the extracellular TGFβ activity is primarily regulated by the conversion of latent TGFβ to active TGFβ, and latent TGFβ is considered as a molecular sensor that response to specific signals by releasing active TGFβ. These signals are often perturbations of the ECM that are associated with phenomena such as angiogenesis, wound repair, inflammation, and cell growth 20. We previously demonstrated that active TGFβ1 released from bone matrix induces MSCs migration for bone remodeling 21. The fact that TGFβ activation occurs during tissue injury or under other stressful conditions 22–26 suggests that active TGFβ may act as a pro-migratory factor for MSCs to participate tissue repair/remodeling.
In vasculature, it is known that increase in shear stress and injury of the arteries induce activation of TGFβ25,27,28. TGFβs are important modulators of vascular remodeling in diseases such as atherosclerosis, restenosis and hypertension. Importantly, TGFβ levels elevate during progressive neointimal thickening following arterial injury 29,30. Thus, arterial injury in animals provides a good model to examine the function of active TGFβ released from ECM during tissue remodeling. Accumulated evidence suggests that blood circulation/bone marrow-derived 31–37 or vascular wall-resident stem /progenitor cells38–43 can be recruited to the injured sites where they may play an essential role in the development of intimal hyperplasia. In the present study, using a rat model of balloon-induced injury of carotid artery 44 and a mouse model of wire-induced injury of femoral artery 45, we demonstrate that MSCs mobilized into peripheral blood and migrated to the injured sites to participate in vascular repair and remodeling. We found that active TGFβ is essential for both the mobilization of the stem cells into circulating blood and subsequent recruitment of these cells to the remodeling sites. These observations shed new light on the mechanisms by which TGFβ participates in both tissue repair/regeneration in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis and tissue remodeling in disease conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Sprague-Dawley rats and wild type C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Charles River. Nestin-cre and C57BL/6J-Gtrosa26 tm1EYFP mice were purchased from Jackson Lab. All animals were maintained in the animal facility of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. The experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
In Vitro Assays for MSCs Migration
To prepare vascular conditioned medium, male Sprague-Dawley rats (250–300 g) were perfused with the 200 ml 0.9% saline and their ascending thoracic aortae were isolated from the peri-adventitial tissue under a dissection microscope. The isolated aortae were cut into three pieces with equal length and were flushed with sterilized phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Endothelium injury was achieved by rubbing the luminal surface three times with a cotton-tipped applicator as described previously 46. Each segment of injured aorta and the uninjured control were cultured in 24-well tissue culture plates with 600 µl serum free DMEM at 37°C. Two days later, the conditioned media were collected and stored at −80°C. In some experiments, neutralizing antibodies against TGFβ1, TGFβ2, TGFβ3, SDF-1 or MCP-1 at 500 ng/ml or TβRI inhibitor (SB-505124, 2 µM) were individually added to the conditioned media. Cell migration was assessed in 96-well Transwells (Corning, Inc.) as described previously 21. The 8 µm pore membrane between the upper and lower chambers was pre-coated with 0.5 µg/ml type I collagen (BD Biosciences). 1×104 MSCs in 50 µl serum free DMEM were plated in the upper chambers and 150 µl undiluted conditioned media from the cultured aortae were added to the lower chambers. After 10 hrs-incubation, cells were fixed with 10% formaldehyde for 4 hrs, and then the MSCs remained on the upper chamber membrane were removed with cotton swabs. The cells that had migrated through the pores to the bottom surface of the membrane were stained with hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich). Five fields at 20X magnification were selected. Micrographic images were obtained and the cell number on each image was counted. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Rat Model of Balloon-Induced Injury of Common Carotid Artery
Balloon-induced injury of common carotid artery was conducted as described previously 44. Briefly, rats were anesthetized by i.p. injection of ketamine (80 mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg), and the right carotid artery was isolated by a middle cervical incision. The distal right common carotid artery and region of the bifurcation were exposed. A 2F Fogarty balloon catheter (Baxter V. Mueller) was introduced through the external carotid artery and advanced into the thoracic aorta. The balloon was inflated with saline to distend the common carotid artery and was then pulled back to the external carotid artery. After six repetitions of this procedure, the endothelium was removed completely, and some injury to medial smooth muscle layers throughout the common carotid artery. After removal of the catheter, the external carotid artery was ligated and the wound closed. The left carotid artery was not damaged and served as a control.
Mouse Model of Wire-Induced Injury of Femoral Artery
Transluminal mechanical injury of the femoral artery was conducted as described previously 45. Briefly, either the left or right femoral artery was subjected to blunted dissection. A straight spring wire (0.38 mm in diameter, No. C-SF-15-15, COOK, Bloomington, IN) was inserted toward the iliac artery to reach 5-mm distance from the incision. The wire was left in place for 1 min to denude endothelium and dilate the artery. Blood flow in the femoral artery was restored by releasing the sutures placed in the proximal and distal portions. To interrupt TGFβ1 signaling or MCP-1 signaling gradient in vivo, some mice were pretreated with TβRI inhibitor (SB-505124, 5 mg/kg, i.p. injection), a MCP-1-specific antagonist (RS 504393, 2 mg/kg, s.c.) or vehicle (50% DMSO in 0.9% saline) once daily, started at 3 days before the surgery and continued until mice were sacrificed. At 3 days or 2 wks post surgery, mice were euthanized by i.p. administration of ketamine/xylazine. Five hundred µl peripheral blood from each mouse were collected by cardiac puncture, the blood or plasma were used for following studies. The femoral artery was excised, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and embedded in paraffin. Thin sections (5 µm) were used for histological and immunohistochemical analyses.
ELISA of TGFβ1, TGFβ3 and MCP-1 in Conditioned Media and Plasma
Levels of active and total TGFβ1 and TGFβ3 in conditioned media of aorta and plasma of wire-injured mice were determined using a DuoSet ELISA Development kit (R&D Systems). Levels of MCP-1 in conditioned media of aorta and plasma were determined using a Mouse MCP-1 ELISA MAX (Biolegend).
Analysis of Biotinylated TGFβ1-Bound Cells in Bone Marrow
Biotinylated TGFβ1 (60 ng/kg bw, R&D System) was injected into mouse via tail vein. Twenty four hrs later, bone marrow was collected by flushing 1 ml mesencult® MSC medium (Stem Cell Technologies) through the femurs. Cells were planted on coverslip and cultured with mesencult® MSC medium for 2 days. Double immunofluorescence staining of the cells attached to the slides was conducted using streptavidin-FITC for biotinylated TGFβ1 and Texas red for antibodies against nestin, Sca1, CD29, and CD11b.
Characterization of Human MSCs
Green fluorescence protein (GFP)-labeled human MSCs were purchased from Texas A&M, Institute for Regenerative Medicine. Cells were sorted by FACS using antibodies against CD29, Sca-1, CD45 and CD11b (Bio-Legend). The sorted cells were enriched, cultured and further confirmed by flow cytometry. For osteogenic differentiation, cells were seeded at a density of 5×103/cm2 with α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 0.1 µM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM β-glycerol phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich), and 50 µM ascorbate-2-phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich). Cultures in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS served as a negative control. After 3 wks of differentiation, the mineralization capacity of the cells was evaluated by Alizarin Red staining (2% of Alizarin Red S dissolved in water at pH 4.2). For adipogenic differentiation, cells were seeded at a density of 1×104/cm2 with α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 µM dexamethasone, 0.5 µM IBMX (Sigma-Aldrich), and 10 ng/ml of insulin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 wks. Cultures of cells in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS served as a negative control. Lipid accumulation was identified by Oil-red-O staining (0.5 g of Oil-red-O [Sigma-Aldrich] dissolved in 100 ml of isopropanol [Sigma-Aldrich], and diluted to 60% with distilled water). For chondrogenic differentiation, cells (1×106) were seeded in polypropylene tubes with high-glucose D-MEM supplemented with 0.1 µM dexamethasone, 1% ITS (Sigma-Aldrich), 50 µM ascorbate-2-phosphate, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich), 50 µg/ml of proline (Sigma-Aldrich), and 20 ng/ml of TGF-β3 (R&D Systems). Culture cells in high-glucose D-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS served as a negative control. After 3 wks in culture, the pellets were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 2 days and embedded in paraffin. Then 4-µm-thick sections were processed for toluidine blue staining (1 g of toluidine blue [Sigma-Aldrich] was dissolved in 100 ml of 70% alcohol and diluted to 10% with 0.9% NaCl, pH adjusted to 2.3).
Flow Cytometry Analysis
Blood samples were collected from mice by cardiac puncture. After the process of RBC lysis with commercial ACK lysis buffer (Quality Biological, Inc), cells were washed with 0.1% BSA in PBS and then counted. 1×106/ml cells were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 prior to blocking in 2.5% BSA for 1 hr, incubated with Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated Nestin antibody (BD, Pharmingen) or isotype control for 1 hr at 37°C in dark room, and then washed twice with 0.1% BSA in PBS. Sca1+CD29+CD11b−CD45− were considered as MSC fraction 21,47, c-Kit+Sca-1+Lin– cells were considered as the primitive HSC fraction 33, and VE-cadherin+CD133+CD31+CD11b− cells were considered as the EPC fraction 48. For analysis of MSCs, HSCs, and EPCs in peripheral blood, the cells were stained with the combination of antibodies against cell surface markers. Specifically, for MSCs, PE-conjugated anti-Sca1, PE/Cy7-conjugated anti-CD29, PerCP- conjugated anti-CD45, and APC-conjugated anti-CD11b antibodies were used. For HSCs, cells were stained with the combination of cocktail biotinylated monoclonal antibodies against lineage markers, PE-conjugated anti-Sca-1, PerCP-conjugated c-kit, and then stained with streptavidin-allophycocyanin. For EPCs, the cells were stained with the combination of PE-conjugated anti-VE-cadherin, FITC-conjugated anti-CD133, APC-conjugated anti-CD11b and PerCP-conjugated anti-CD31, all commercially available from Bio-Legend. Probes were analyzed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer and CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson).
Morphometric and Histological Analysis of Neointima
To study the morphology of the arteries, vessels were perfused with PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde by cannulating the left ventricle. Five µm sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Morphometric analysis of neointima formation after 14 days consisted of the measurement of intimal area (I), medial area (M), and I/M ratios with a computerized morphometric analysis system (Image Pro Plus 6.0, Olympus) by an investigator blinded to the treatment. For each artery section, five random, noncontiguous microscopic fields were examined. All measurements performed on the four sections of this aorta were averaged.
Immunohistochemical Analysis of the Vessel Sections
For immunohistochemical analysis of active TGFβ1 expression, paraffin-embedded sections (5 µm) were incubated with LC(1–30), a polyclonal antibody raised against the amino-terminal 30 amino acids of the mature TGFβ1 and specifically reacts with active TGFβ149–51. An HRP-streptavidin detection system (Dako) was used to detect the positive staining followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin (Dako). Double immunofluorescence staining was performed as described previously 52. After blocking in 0.5% horse serum, sections were incubated with first antibodies (anti-α-SMA, anti-nestin or anti-Sca1, Abcam) followed by incubation with FITC, or Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma). The sections were mounted with the ProLong Antifade Kit (Molecular Probes) and observed under a confocal microscope (FLUOVIEW FV300, Olympus).
Statistics
Statistical analysis was done using SAS software. The unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test and χ2test were used to calculate P values.
RESULTS
MSCs Are Mobilized to Peripheral Blood and Recruited to the Remodeling Arteries in Response to Vascular Injury
Mobilization of the stem cells/progenitor cells from bone marrow to peripheral blood is a prerequisite for the involvement of the cells in tissue repair and remodeling. To assess whether Sca1+CD29+CD11b−CD45− MSCs 21,47 can be mobilized in response to arterial injury, we used a mouse model of wire-induced injury of femoral artery 45, in which the arterial changes following injury mimic neointimal formation in restenosis. The numbers of Sca1+CD29+ CD11b−CD45− cells were significantly elevated in peripheral blood compared to their sham control group within 3 days post injury, and the elevation lasted for 2 wks (Fig. 1A). Bone marrow-derived nestin+ cells are MSC-enriched cell population 53. A similar increase in nestin+ cells in peripheral blood was also observed after wire-injury of femoral artery (Fig. 1B). These results showed that MSCs were mobilized into blood circulation following arterial injury.
Figure 1.
MSCs were mobilized to peripheral blood and recruited to the remodeling arteries in response to vascular injury. (A and B) Percentages of Sca1+CD29+CD11b−CD45− cells or nestin+ cells, respectively in peripheral blood at 1 day (1D), 3 days (3D) and 2 wks (2W) after femoral arterial injury or sham surgery in mice. Results are the means±SD, n=4 mice per group per time point. * p<0.05 vs respective Sham groups. (C) Calculation of the ratio of intima/media areas (I/M ratio) of rat carotid artery from uninjured artery (Control), and 1 wk (1W) or 2 wks (2W) after balloon injury. Results are the means±SD, n=4 mice per group per time point. * p<0.001 vs uninjured control group. (D and E) Representative H&E and immunofluorescence images of tissue sections of rat carotid artery from uninjured artery (Control), and 1 wk (1W) or 2 wks (2W) after balloon injury. Left column of (D): H&E staining; Right columns of (D): Triple-immunofluorescence staining for nestin (green), α-SMA (red), and DAPI (blue) in carotid artery of uninjured control, 1W or 2W post injury. Scale bars: 100µm. Left column of (E): H&E staining; Right columns of (D): Triple-immunofluorescence staining for nestin (green), α-SMA (red), and DAPI (blue) in carotid artery of uninjured control, 1W or 2W post injury. Scale bars: 50µm. I, intima layer; M, media smooth muscle layer; A, adventitia layer.
The mobilization of MSCs to peripheral blood in response to injury indicated that they may participate in arterial remodeling. We then examined whether the mobilized MSCs were recruited to the injured artery in a rat model of balloon injury of carotid artery 44 and mouse model of wire injury of femoral artery 45. Neointimal tissue was observed at 1 wk post injury, became much thicker at 2 wks post injury in rat carotid artery (Fig. 1C–1E) and in mouse femoral artery (Fig. S1A, and S1B). Neointima hyperplasia continued to grow up to 6 wks post injury until the re-endothelialization is completed44,45. We examined the recruitment of the MSCs at 1 wk and 2 wks following injury during the active phase of neointima formation. Nestin+ cells were detected in the neointima of injured carotid arteries of rats (Fig. 1E) and injured femoral arteries of mice (Fig. S1C), but were undetectable in uninjured arteries. Of note, 90.1±5.8% of the cells in the single layer of the endoluminal side of the neointimal tissue are nestin+, whereas almost no nestin+ cells were detected in the deeper layers of the neointima, which consisted α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA)+ myofibroblast-like cells (Fig. 1G).
Recruited MSCs Participate in Both Endothelium Repair and Neointima thickening
To further dissect the contribution of the recruited cells to the formation of neointima, we examined the cell fate(s) of the nestin+ cells by performing double immunofluorescence analysis of the artery sections. 89.6±9.2% and 83.1±10.1% of the nestin+ cells were Sca1+ cells in the single layer of the intraluminal side of the neointimal tissue at 1 wk and 2 wks, respectively, following injury (Fig. 2A and 2B), indicating that most of the newly recruited cells are MSCs. The exclusive localization of nestin+ cells at the single layer of the intraluminal side indicates that the cells may participate in reendothelialization of the injured vessels.
Figure 2.
The differentiation fates of the recruited cells in neointimal tissue. (A) Colocalization of nestin and Sca1 in the recruited cells. Triple-immunofluorescence staining for nestin (green), Sca1 (red), and DAPI (blue) in balloon injured rat carotid artery 1W or 2W post injury. Scale bars: 50µm. (B) Calculation of the percentages of Sca1+ cells out of nestin+ cells in the layer near to luminal side. Results are the means±SD, n=4 mice per group per time point. (C) Colocalization of nestin and CD31 in the recruited cells. Triple-immunofluorescence staining for nestin (green), CD31 (red), and DAPI (blue) in balloon injured rat carotid artery 2W post injury (Injury 2W-1 & Injury 2W-2 indicate two different artery samples). Scale bars: 50µm. (D) Calculation of the percentages of CD31+ cells out of nestin+ cells in the layer near to luminal side. Results are the means±SD, n=4 mice per group per time point. (E) Localization of EYFP+ and nestin+ cells in neointimal tissue. Triple-immunofluorescence staining for EYFP (green), nestin (red), and DAPI (blue) in wire injured femoral arteries 1W or 2W post injury in Nestin-cre and R26-stop-EYFP mice. Scale bars: 50µm. I, intima layer; M, media smooth muscle layer; A, adventitia layer. (F) Calculation of the percentages of EYFP+ cells out of total neointimal cells. Results are the means±SD, n=4 mice per group per time point.
Approximately 19.0%±3.4% of nestin+ cells expressed CD31 at 2 wks following injury (Fig. 2C and 2D), indicating that some nestin+ cells were transformed into endothelial cells for endothelium repair. To examine whether the recruited nestin+ cells are also capable of differentiation into myofibroblasts that contribute to thick neointima formation, we took advantage of a novel genetic mouse model by crossing mice carrying a nestin promoter/enhancer-driven cre-recombinase (Nestin-cre) with C57BL/6J-Gtrosa26 tm1EYFP (R26-stop-EYFP) mice in which both nestin+ cells and their descendants at the neointimal tissue can be marked (Fig. S2). Approximately 57.0% and 44.6% of cells in all layers of neointimal tissue were EYFP+ cells at 1 wk and 2 wks, respectively, post injury, and almost none of the media smooth muscle cells were EYFP+ (Fig. 2D and 2E). Consistent with Fig. 1, only the cells at the layer of endoluminal side still maintained nestin expression, and the nestin+ cell-derived myofibroblastic cells in deeper layers lost the nestin marker. Collectively, these results suggested that the MSCs were mobilized into the peripheral blood in response to vascular injury and recruited to the injured sites where they give rise to both endothelial cells for reendothelialization and myofibroblastic cells to form thick neointima.
Active TGFβ1 Is Released from Injured Arteries to Recruit MSCs to the Injured Sites
We have shown that the active TGFβ1 induces MSCs migration during bone remodeling 21. We therefore investigated whether TGFβ1 also plays a role in recruiting MSCs in response to arterial injury. We measured the levels of active TGFβ1 in injured arteries. Immunohistostaining analysis showed that active active TGFβ1 expression increased in intimal and medial layers of the injured arteries at 3 days, 1 wk and 2 wks post injury in both rats (Fig. S3A) and mice (Fig. S3B). In contrast, active TGFβ1 was undetectable in uninjured arteries. Active TGFβ1 levels in injury arteries detected by ELISA were elevated at 8 hr post injury, reached peak at 3–14 days (Fig. 3A). The ratios of active to total TGFβ1 levels were in a similar pattern (Fig. 3B), indicating that the activation of TGFβ1 from latent form to free form was induced by the injury of vascular matrix.
Figure 3.
Active TGFβ1 is released from injured arteries to recruit MSCs to the injured sites. (A) (A and B) ELISA analysis of active TGFβ1 levels and ratios of active/total TGFβ1, respectively, in wire-injured mouse femoral arteries at 8 hrs, 3 days, 1 wks and 3 wks post injury (I). 0 hr sample was uninjured control (U). Results are the means± SD, n=5 mice per group, * p<0.05, # p<0.01, vs uninjured control. (C–G) Active TGFβ released from injured vessels is a primary factor to stimulate migration of MSCs. (C) Diagrams show the preparation of aorta-conditioned medium (Aorta-CM). Ascending thoracic aortae isolated from rats were either injured by rubbing the luminal surface three times with a cotton-tipped applicator or left uninjured. The aortae were cultured in serum-free DMEM for 48 hrs, and culture media were collected as injured Aorta-CM or uninjured Aorta-CM. (D) Transwell assay for migration of MSCs using DMEM, uninjured Aorta-CM or injured Aorta-CM collected from (C). (E) Numbers of migrated cells in (D) were counted per field of view (FV, magnification X20). Results are means±SD, n=4 preparation per group, *p<0.001 vs Uninjured Aorta-CM. (F) Transwell assay for MSCs migration using injured Aorta-CM with addition of neutralizing antibodies (Ab) as indicated. Numbers of migrated cells were counted per FV (magnification 20X). Results means±SD, n=4 per group, *p<0.01 vs. IgG control. (G) Active TGFβ1 and β3 levels measured by ELISA in CM prepared in (D). Results means±SD, n=4 per group, *p<0.01 vs Uninjured Aorta-CM.
Increased active TGFβ1 level in the injured arteries indicates that TGFβ1 may stimulate the migration of MSCs to the injured arterial sites. We developed an aorta-conditioned medium (Aorta-CM)-based cell migration assay, in which MSCs were placed in the upper chamber and the Aorta-CM was placed in the lower chamber of a transwell chamber (Fig. 3C). Aorta-CM prepared from ex vivo injured aorta significantly enhanced cell migration (Fig. 3D and 3E) compare to CM prepared from uninjured aorta. When neutralizing antibodies against TGFβ1 or TGFβ3 were added to the Aorta-CM, the migration of MSCs was inhibited, whereas the TGFβ2 neutralizing antibody had minimal inhibition (Fig. 3F). Consistently, high levels of active TGFβ1 and TGFβ3 were detected in the Aorta-CM from injured vessels (Fig. 3G). These results suggested that TGFβ is a primary factor released by injured arteries to stimulate MSCs migration. We also examined the downstream signaling that mediate the effect of TGFβ. The roles of canonical and noncanonical TGFβ signaling pathways in mediating MSCs migration stimulated by injured Aorta-CM were detected. Addition of SB505124 (TβRI/Smads inhibitor) or SP600125 (JNK inhibitor) in the injured Aorta-CM significantly suppressed the migration of MSCs, whereas U0126 (ERK inhibitor), SB202190 (p38 inhibitor) or Y27632 (RhoA inhibitor) had marginal effect (Fig. S4). These results suggest that both Smads and JNK signaling contribute to the recruitment of MSCs to the injured arteries.
Active TGFβ1 Mobilizes MSCs into Peripheral Blood
Inflammatory cells and platelets in circulating blood produce TGFβ after tissue injury 25,54, and active TGFβ released from the injured arteries may also diffuse into the blood circulation. Indeed, active TGFβ1 levels in blood was elevated at 3 days, and reached 8-fold at 1 wk and 10-fold at 2 wks post injury (Fig. 4A). To investigate whether active TGFβ1 is sufficient to mobilize stem cells, recombinant active TGFβ1 (rhTGFβ1) was injected i.v. to uninjured mice. The numbers of both nestin+ and Sca1+CD29+CD11b−CD45− cells in peripheral blood were increased 2.5~5 fold at 1 day post rhTGFβ1 treatment relative to that of the vehicle-treated group (Fig. 4B and 4C). In contrast, the numbers of HSCs and EPCs in peripheral blood remained unchanged post rhTGFβ1 injection (Fig. 4D and 4E). To examine the origin(s) of the mobilized MSCs, biotinylated rhTGFβ1 was injected i.v. and its binding to MSCs at different tissue was analyzed by measuring streptavidin-FITC-bound cells. Biotinylated rhTGFβ1 bounds to bone marrow nestin+Sca1+CD29+CD11b− cells (Fig. 5A and 5B). No specific biotinylated TGFβ1-bound cells were found in liver and lung tissue. We detected a few positive cells in adipose tissue and adventitia tissue of femoral arteries, but these cells were nestin-negative (Fig. S5). The results suggest that the biotinylated TGFβ1 mainly binds to nestin+ MSCs in bone marrow. Importantly, we found 91% and 89% of the sorted Sca1+CD29+CD11b−CD45− cells from bone marrow and peripheral blood, respectively, following rhTGFβ injection were nestin+ (Fig. 5C and 5D), indicating that the nestin+ cells in peripheral blood are MSCs and are mobilized primarily from bone marrow. These cells have multilineage differentiation capacity since they were capable of osteogenesis (Fig. 5E), adipogenesis (Fig. 5F), and chondrogenesis (Fig. 5G). Further, nestin+ cells can differentiate into smooth muscle- or myofibroblast-like cells (Fig. 5H) and endothelial cells (Fig. 5I), and the nestin expression decreased after the differentiation (Fig. 5J). Collectively, these results suggest that active TGFβ1 is sufficient to mobilize MSCs from bone marrow to the peripheral blood.
Figure 4.
Active TGFβ1 is sufficient to mobilize MSCs into peripheral blood. (A) Active TGFβ1 levels in peripheral blood of mouse 1 day, 3 days, 1 wk and 2 wks post femoral artery injury. Sham controls were mouse without injury. Results are the means± SD, n=5 mice per group, * p<0.01 vs respective Sham controls. (B–E) Mobilization of stem cells into peripheral blood by recombinant human TGFβ1 (rhTGFβ1) transfusion in uninjured mice. Flow cytometry measured percentages of nestin+ cells (B), Sca1+CD29+CD11b−CD45− cells (C), Sca1+c-kit+lin− cells (D) or CD133+VE-cadherin+ CD31dimCD11b− (E) in peripheral blood at 1 day after i.v. injection of rhTGFβ1 or vehicle. Results are the means±SD, n= 4 mice per group, * p<0.01 vs. respective Veh groups.
Figure 5.
TGFβ-mobilized cells are a subset of MSC lineage. (A and B) TGFβ1-bound cells in flushed mouse bone marrow at 24 hrs after the injection of biotinylated-TGFβ1 into blood. The femur was flushed with MSCs growth medium. Flushed attached cells were double immunofluorescence stained with streptavidin-FITC for biotinylated TGFβ1 and with Texas red for the indicated antibodies. Representative confocal micrographic images are shown in (A). Quantification of different cell types (in %) in total TGFβ1-bound cells is shown in (B). Results are means±SD calculated from 3 preparations of each mouse, n= 3 mice per group. (C) Sca-1+CD29+CD45−CD11b− cells were sorted from murine bone marrow cells by flow cytometry sorting, and the sorted cells were analyzed by FACS analysis using specific nestin antibody. (D) Calculation of the percentages of nestin+ cells out of Sca-1+CD29+CD45−CD11b− cells in the bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB). Results are the means±SD, n=4 mice per group per time point. (E–J) Nestin+ cells were cultured in single cell suspensions to detect single colony forming. Individual colonies were selected and expanded by passaging. Each clonal strain derived from a single CFU-F underwent osteogenic (E, Alizarin red stain), adipogenic (F,Oil-red stain), and chondrogenic (G, Toluiding blue stain) induction by incubation with different culture media. Scale bars: 100µm. (H and I) Nestin+ cells were incubated with (bottom panels) or without (upper panels) smooth muscle differentiation medium and endothelium differentiation medium, respectively, and the cells were immunostained with anti-αSMA (H, smooth muscle marker) and anti-CD31 antibody (I, endothelial cell marker). (J) Decreased expression of nestin in cells incubated with (bottom panels) or without (upper panels) smooth muscle differentiation medium.
TGFβ Activation Is Essential for the Recruitment of MSCs to the Remodeling Arteries in Response to Injury
To further validate the role of TGFβ in MSCs mobilization, TβRI inhibitor SB-505124 (SB) was injected i.v. of mice with injury of femoral arteries. Blocking of TβRI almost abolished the increase in nestin+ cells in peripheral blood at 3 day and 2 wks post arterial injury (Fig. 6A and 6B). In addition, neointima was barely formed in injured arteries of SB-treated mice compared to vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 6C, 6D, left columns and Fig. 6E). Unlike the single layer of nestin+ cells on the endoluminal side of neointima in the vehicle-treated mice, nestin+ cells were undetectable on the vessel wall of the SB-treated mice (Fig. 6C, 6D, right columns and Fig. 6F). These results indicate that TGFβ is required for the recruitment of MSCs during vascular remodeling.
Figure 6.
TGFβ was required for the mobilization and recruitment of MSCs to the remodeling arteries in response to injury. (A and B) Injection of TβRI blocker SB-505124 (SB, 5 mg/kg-bw, i.p. daily) blocked mobilization of MSCs following arterial injury. Flow cytometrical quantitation of the numbers of nestin+ cells (% of total cell counted) in blood at (A) 3 days or (B) 2 wks after femoral arterial injury or sham surgery in either SB- or vehicle (Veh)- treated mice. Results are means±SD, n= 3 mice per group per time point, * p<0.001 vs. respective Veh+injury groups. (C and D) TβRI blocker inhibited neointima formation after wire-injury of femoral artery in mice. Left column of (C): H&E staining; Right columns of (C): Triple-immunofluorescence staining for nestin (green), α-SMA (red), and DAPI (blue) in femoral artery of uninjured control, 2W post injury, and Injury+SB mice. Scale bars: 100µm. Left column of (D): H&E staining; Right columns of (D): Triple-immunofluorescence staining for nestin (green), α-SMA (red), and DAPI (blue) in femoral artery of uninjured control, 2W post injury, and Injury+SB mice. Scale bars: 50µm. I, intima layer; M, media smooth muscle layer; A, adventitia layer. (E) Calculation the ratios of intima/media area (I/M Ratio) of uninjured (Sham) or injured femoral arteries of mice treated with SB or Veh at 2 wks post injury. Results are means±SD, n= 4 mice per group, * p<0.001 vs Veh+Injury group. (F) Quantification of the percentage of nestin+ cells out of the total cells in the layer close to luminal side of the vessels. Results means±SD, n=5 mice per group, *p<0.001 vs. Veh+Injury group.
MCP-1 Mediates TGFβ-Induced Migration and homing of MSCs to the Injured Arteries without Affecting the Mobilization of the Cells from Bone Marrow to Circulating Blood
MCP155 and CXCL12/SDF1α 56–59 have been reported to be involved in the recruitment of stem/progenitor cells to the vasculature. We showed that neutralization antibody against MCP1, but not SDF1α, inhibited injured Aorta-CM-induced migration of MSCs in the transwell assays (Fig. 7A). Consistently, significantly increased MCP1 production was detected in both injured Aorta-CM (Fig. 7B) and the injured mouse femoral arteries (mainly the smooth muscle cells and neointimal cells) at 3 days~ 2 weeks following injury (Fig. 7C). TGFβ has been shown to stimulate MCP1 expression in the vascular smooth muscle cells 55. We found that MCP1 production by the injured aorta was inhibited by selective TβRI kinase inhibitor SB505124 or neutralizing antibodies against TGFβ1 or TGFβ3 (Fig. 7B), indicating that TGFβs were primary factors that regulate MCP1 expression via a TβRI-mediated pathway. To further elucidate the role of MCP1 in MSCs mobilization and recruitment during arterial remodeling, RS 504393 (RS), a selective MCP-1 receptor antagonist, was administered in mice with femoral artery injury. RS administration significantly inhibited neointima formation (Fig. 7D, left column and Fig. 7E) and the recruitment of the nestin+ cells to neointima (Fig. 7D, right columns and Fig. 7F). Even though majority of the nestin+ cells in peripheral blood expressed CCR2, receptor of MCP1, the percentage of CCR2+ cells from sham control mice and injured mice are not significantly different (Fig. 7G). Further, the number of nestin+ MSCs in peripheral blood of the injured mice was not reduced with the treatment of MCP1 inhibitor (Fig. 7H and 7I). These results suggest that MCP1/CCR2, a downstream target of TGFβ in injured arteries, functions as a local chemoattractant responsible for the migration and homing of MSCs to the injured vessels.
Figure 7.
MCP-1 mediated TGFβ-induced migration and homing of MSCs to the injured arteries without affecting the mobilization of the cells into circulating blood. (A) Neutralizing MCP-1 inhibited TGFβ-induced MSCs migration. Transwell assay for migration of MSCs using injured Aorta-CM with addition of neutralizing antibodies (Ab) against SDF1α or MCP-1. CM added with IgG-treated cells served as control. Results are means±SD, n=4, * p<0.01 vs uninjured Aorta-CM control. (B) MCP-1 levels in Aorta-CM measured by ELISA. CM was prepared by incubating the injured aorta in the culture media with addition of control IgG, anti-TGFβ1 or anti-TGFβ3 neutralizing antibodies or TβRI inhibitor SB505124 (SB), or vehicle for 48 hrs. Results are the means±SD, n=4, * p<0.01 vs. IgG or vehicle controls. (C) Increased MCP1 expression in balloon-injured carotid arteries in rats. Immunohistochemical staining of MCP1 (brown) in rat carotid arteries at 3 days, 1 wks and 3 wks post injury. 0 hr sample was uninjured control. Scale bars: 50µm. I, intima layer; M, media smooth muscle layer; A, adventitia layer. (D and E) Selective MCP-1 antagonist RS504393 (RS) inhibited neointima formation in injured femoral arteries in mice. Left column in (D): H&E staining of injured or uninjured (Sham) femoral arteries of mice treated with RS or vehicle 2 wks post injury. RS (2 mg/kg-bw) or vehicle were injected subcutaneously once a day, starting 3 days before vascular injury and continued for 2 wks when arteries were harvested. Scale bars: 100µm. Right columns in (D): Triple-immunofluorescence staining was performed for nestin (green), α-SMA (red), and DAPI (blue) in cross sections of femoral arteriis 2 wks post injury Scale bars: 50µm. (E): The I/M ratios of (D). Results are means± SD, n=4 mice per group, * p<0.001 vs Veh+Injury group. (F) Quantification of the number of of nestin+ cells in (D). Results are means±SD, n=4 mice per group, * p<0.001 vs Veh+Injury group. (G) Calculation of the percentage of CCR2+ cells out of nestin+ cells in peripheral blood from sham control and arterial injured mice. Results means±SD, n=4 mice per group per time point. (H and I) Flow cytometrical analysis of the number of nestin+ cells in peripheral blood at (H) 3 days or (I) 2 wks after femoral arterial injury or sham surgery in RS- or vehicle- treated mice. Results means±SD, n=4 mice per group per time point, * p<0.01 vs Veh+Sham groups.
DISCUSSION
Upon secretion, TGFβs are deposited in the matrices in various tissues as a latent form in a complex with its precursor molecule, latency-associated peptide (LAP)18,19. The association of the mature domain with LAP prevents active TGFβ from binding to its receptor and subsequent action. Latent TGFβ is considered as a molecular sensor that releases active TGFβs in response to the perturbations of the ECM by various mechanisms at the situations of mechanical stress, wound repair, tissue injury, and inflammation 20,60–62. Our results show that TGFβ1 is activated in vascular tissue in response to injury, and active TGFβ1 stimulates the migration and homing of MSCs to the injured sites for vascular repair and remodeling. The specific inhibitor of TGFβ type I receptor blocked the recruitment of the cells to form neointima at the remodeling sites. Previously, we have shown that TGFβ activated from bone matrix during osteoclastic bone resorption induces migration of MSCs for normal bone remodeling 21. Thus, TGFβ may act as an injury/stress-activated messenger to recruit MSCs for tissue repair, regeneration, and pathological remodeling in various organs. Excessive TGFβ activation is a major contributor to progressive fibrosis in many organs including lung, liver, kidney, heart, skin and arteries 63,64. Sustained active TGFβ released locally due to chronic repetitive tissue injury may cause aberrant excessive recruitment of stem/progenitor cells, leading to excessive accumulation of myofibroblasts and progressive fibrosis. In Camurati-Engelmann disease and Marfan Syndrome, two hereditary disorders with mutations either in the LAP or in extracellular protein fibrillin-1, abnormal release of active TGFβ leads to fibrotic bone formation 21,65,66 and skin fibrosis 67,68, respectively. Thus, tempo-spatial regulation of TGFβ activation is essential in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis and the regeneration of the damaged tissue by the recruitment of stem/progenitor cells, whereas sustained abnormal activation of TGFβ may lead to fibrosis development due to excessive recruitment of stem/progenitor cells and their subsequent differentiation.
Our results suggest that high levels of active TGFβ1 in peripheral blood are primarily account for the mobilization of MSCs from bone marrow to peripheral blood. Thus, we consider that TGFβ acts as both a systemic factor to induce the mobilization of MSCs and a local factor to increase the production of MCP1 to induce the migration and homing of MSCs to the injured tissue (Fig. S6). One of the sources of active TGFβ in blood may be the injured vascular matrix. It is known that the extracellular matrix serves to concentrate latent TGFβ at the sites of intended function to influence the bioavailability and/or function of TGFβ activators18–20. Indeed, in the injured vessels, we observed rapid and sustained elevation of active TGFβ1, which may diffuse into the blood circulation. Platelets and inflammatory cells are major players in the initial thromboinflammatory response following arterial injury 69. These cells within circulating blood or adhere to the injured tissue release large amount of active TGFβ1 into blood circulation 25,54, and may also contribute to the high active TGFβ1 level in peripheral blood after vascular injury. Our data indicate that bone marrow is a primary origin of MSCs mobilized by TGFβ1, but we could not exclude the possibility of the mobilization of MSCs from other niches even though we did not observe biotinylated TGFβ-bound MSCs in several other tissues. MSCs seems a major cell type in bone marrow that is mobilized by TGFβ1 as we did not observe significant number increase for HSCs and EPCs in peripheral blood. However, in the genetic mouse model in which nestin+ cells and their descendents were permanently marked, approximately 44.6% of the neointimal cells were derived from nestin+ cells, indicating that other cell types are also involved in neointima formation. It was reported that local stem cells in surrounding tissues such as vascular adventitia may also migrate to the injured sites43,70,71. Thus, it is likely that pro-migratory factors other than TGFβ1 stimulate the migration of local resident stem cells and/or smooth muscle cells from the media layer to the injured sites to participate in vascular remodeling. The identity of these cell types and their origins remain to be defined.
MCP-1, a local chemoattractant stimulated by TGFβ in the vasculature, acts as a downstream in the cascade of TGFβ signaling to enhance the recruitment of MSCs (Fig. 6S). However, the antagonist of CCR2 did not change the increased number of MSCs in blood circulation, indicating that MCP1 is not involved in mobilizing MSCs from their bone marrow niche to peripheral blood. As the spectrum of pro-migratory factors downstream of TGFβ in different tissue context may vary, deeper insight is needed into the downstream events by which TGFβ mobilizes MSCs from their original niches such as bone marrow at various biological conditions. Interaction between SDF-1α/CXCL12 and its receptor CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) plays a key role in the mobilization of vascular stem/progenitor cells including HSCs and EPCs during the process of tissue repair or regeneration14,15. Even though we found that SDF-1α/CXCL12 was not involved in the migration and homing of MSCs to the injured vessels, whether it mediates TGFβ1-induced MSC mobilization from bone marrow to peripheral blood is an interesting topic of future study. The results demonstrated in this study reveal a new mechanism for TGFβ1-involved vascular repair/remodeling. TGFβs play a crucial role in the vascular remodeling in many cardiovascular diseases. Whether TGFβ-recruited MSCs is a major contributor to the pathogenesis of these vascular disorders remain to be investigated. Further, transplanted MSCs participate in tissue regeneration upon injury events such as myocardial infarction and vascular injuries in animal studies, and injection of MSCs has therapeutic benefits in the treatment of ischemic heart diseases and postmyocardial infarction clinically. It is interesting to determine whether TGFβ-recruited MSCs is a key step for tissue regeneration.
CONCLUSION
We demonstrate that TGFβ, activated and released from vascular matrix in response to injury, is essential for the recruitment of MSCs to the injured sites to participate in vascular remodeling by inducing MCP1 production. We also reveal that blood active TGFβ1 acts as a systemic mobilizer for MSCs from bone marrow to the peripheral blood, where sufficient MSCs are available for the subsequent migration and homing to the remodeling sites. The finding provides novel mechanisms for TGFβ-involved pathological conditions such as vascular remodeling, fibrosis and wound healing, and may shed light on the improvement of cell mobilization and homing in MSC-based therapy.
Supplementary Material
ACKOWLEDGEMENTS
We gratefully thank Dr. Kathleen Flanders for providing us the active TGFβ1 antibody LC(1–30). This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health DK083350 (to M.W.) and AR053973 (to X. C).
Footnotes
Author contributions:
Mei Wan: Conception and design, financial support, Collection and assembly of data, Data analysis and Interpretation, manuscript writing
Changjun Li, Gehuazhen, Kai Jiao, Wenying He, Xiaofeng Jia, Weishan Wang, Chenhui Shi, Qiujuan Xing, and Bing Yu: Provision of study material, Collection and assembly of data
Yiu-Fai Chen and Suzanne Jan De Beur: Data analysis and interpretation
Xu Cao: Conception and design, financial support, Data analysis and Interpretation, manuscript writing
DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors indicate no potential conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Ferrari G, et al. Muscle regeneration by bone marrow-derived myogenic progenitors. Science. 1998;279:1528–1530. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5356.1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Takahashi T, et al. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat. Med. 1999;5:434–438. doi: 10.1038/7434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lagasse E, et al. Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo. Nat. Med. 2000;6:1229–1234. doi: 10.1038/81326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Orlic D, et al. Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infarcted heart, improving function and survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001;98:10344–10349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.181177898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kale S, et al. Bone marrow stem cells contribute to repair of the ischemically injured renal tubule. J. Clin. Invest. 2003;112:42–49. doi: 10.1172/JCI17856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Orlic D, et al. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature. 2001;410:701–705. doi: 10.1038/35070587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ortiz LA, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell engraftment in lung is enhanced in response to bleomycin exposure and ameliorates its fibrotic effects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003;100:8407–8411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1432929100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sato Y, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells xenografted directly to rat liver are differentiated into human hepatocytes without fusion. Blood. 2005;106:756–763. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rochefort GY, et al. Multipotential mesenchymal stem cells are mobilized into peripheral blood by hypoxia. Stem Cells. 2006;24:2202–2208. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Oh JY, et al. The anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic role of mesenchymal stem cells in corneal wound healing following chemical injury. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1047–1055. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sasaki M, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells are recruited into wounded skin and contribute to wound repair by transdifferentiation into multiple skin cell type. J. Immunol. 2008;180:2581–2587. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hong HS, et al. A new role of substance P as an injury-inducible messenger for mobilization of CD29(+) stromal-like cells. Nat. Med. 2009;15:425–435. doi: 10.1038/nm.1909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Quevedo HC, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells restore cardiac function in chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy via trilineage differentiating capacity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009;106:14022–14027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903201106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wojakowski W, Landmesser U, Bachowski R, Jadczyk T, Tendera M. Mobilization of stem and progenitor cells in cardiovascular diseases. Leukemia. 2011 doi: 10.1038/leu.2011.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Krankel N, Spinetti G, Amadesi S, Madeddu P. Targeting stem cell niches and trafficking for cardiovascular therapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011;129:62–81. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schraufstatter IU, Discipio RG, Khaldoyanidi S. Mesenchymal stem cells and their microenvironment. Front Biosci. 2011;17:2271–2288. doi: 10.2741/3853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Caplan AI, Correa D. The MSC: an injury drugstore. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9:11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kanzaki T, Shiina R, Saito Y, Oohashi H, Morisaki N. Role of latent TGF-beta 1 binding protein in vascular remodeling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998;246:26–30. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Munger JS, et al. Latent transforming growth factor-beta: structural features and mechanisms of activation. Kidney Int. 1997;51:1376–1382. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Annes JP, Munger JS, Rifkin DB. Making sense of latent TGFbeta activation. J. Cell Sci. 2003;116:217–224. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tang Y, et al. TGF-beta1-induced migration of bone mesenchymal stem cells couples bone resorption with formation. Nat. Med. 2009;15:757–765. doi: 10.1038/nm.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pittet JF, et al. TGF-beta is a critical mediator of acute lung injury. J. Clin. Invest. 2001;107:1537–1544. doi: 10.1172/JCI11963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sinha S, Heagerty AM, Shuttleworth CA, Kielty CM. Expression of latent TGF-beta binding proteins and association with TGF-beta 1 and fibrillin-1 following arterial injury. Cardiovasc. Res. 2002;53:971–983. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(01)00512-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim KK, et al. Alveolar epithelial cell mesenchymal transition develops in vivo during pulmonary fibrosis and is regulated by the extracellular matrix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006;103:13180–13185. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605669103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ahamed J, et al. In vitro and in vivo evidence for shear-induced activation of latent transforming growth factor-beta1. Blood. 2008;112:3650–3660. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-151753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brunner G, Blakytny R. Extracellular regulation of TGF-beta activity in wound repair: growth factor latency as a sensor mechanism for injury. Thromb. Haemost. 2004;92:253–261. doi: 10.1160/TH04-05-0324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Qi YX, et al. PDGF-BB and TGF-{beta}1 on cross-talk between endothelial and smooth muscle cells in vascular remodeling induced by low shear stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011;108:1908–1913. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019219108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ohno M, Cooke JP, Dzau VJ, Gibbons GH. Fluid shear stress induces endothelial transforming growth factor beta-1 transcription and production. Modulation by potassium channel blockade. J. Clin. Invest. 1995;95:1363–1369. doi: 10.1172/JCI117787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Grainger DJ. Transforming growth factor beta and atherosclerosis: so far, so good for the protective cytokine hypothesis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004;24:399–404. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000114567.76772.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ryan ST, Koteliansky VE, Gotwals PJ, Lindner V. Transforming growth factor-beta-dependent events in vascular remodeling following arterial injury. J. Vasc. Res. 2003;40:37–46. doi: 10.1159/000068937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Asahara T, et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997;275:964–967. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5302.964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shi Q, et al. Evidence for circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. Blood. 1998;92:362–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sata M, et al. Hematopoietic stem cells differentiate into vascular cells that participate in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Nat. Med. 2002;8:403–409. doi: 10.1038/nm0402-403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sata M, et al. The role of circulating precursors in vascular repair and lesion formation. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2005;9:557–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00488.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Massberg S, et al. Platelets secrete stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha and recruit bone marrow-derived progenitor cells to arterial thrombi in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2006;203:1221–1233. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang CH, et al. Stem cell factor deficiency is vasculoprotective: unraveling a new therapeutic potential of imatinib mesylate. Circ. Res. 2006;99:617–625. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000243210.79654.fd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Simper D, Stalboerger PG, Panetta CJ, Wang S, Caplice NM. Smooth muscle progenitor cells in human blood. Circulation. 2002;106:1199–1204. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000031525.61826.a8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sartore S, et al. Contribution of adventitial fibroblasts to neointima formation and vascular remodeling: from innocent bystander to active participant. Circ. Res. 2001;89:1111–1121. doi: 10.1161/hh2401.100844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li G, Chen SJ, Oparil S, Chen YF, Thompson JA. Direct in vivo evidence demonstrating neointimal migration of adventitial fibroblasts after balloon injury of rat carotid arteries. Circulation. 2000;101:1362–1365. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hu Y, et al. Smooth muscle cells in transplant atherosclerotic lesions are originated from recipients, but not bone marrow progenitor cells. Circulation. 2002;106:1834–1839. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000031333.86845.dd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hu Y, et al. Abundant progenitor cells in the adventitia contribute to atherosclerosis of vein grafts in ApoE-deficient mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2004;113:1258–1265. doi: 10.1172/JCI19628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Passman JN, et al. A sonic hedgehog signaling domain in the arterial adventitia supports resident Sca1+ smooth muscle progenitor cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008;105:9349–9354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711382105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Klein D, Hohn HP, Kleff V, Tilki D, Ergun S. Vascular wall-resident stem cells. Histol. Histopathol. 2010;25:681–689. doi: 10.14670/HH-25.681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xing D, et al. Increased protein O-GlcNAc modification inhibits inflammatory and neointimal responses to acute endoluminal arterial injury. Am. J. Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol. 2008;295:H335–H342. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01259.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sata M, et al. A mouse model of vascular injury that induces rapid onset of medial cell apoptosis followed by reproducible neointimal hyperplasia. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2000;32:2097–2104. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.2000.1238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kimura M, et al. Impaired acetylcholine-induced release of nitric oxide in the aorta of male aromatase-knockout mice: regulation of nitric oxide production by endogenous sex hormones in males. Circ. Res. 2003;93:1267–1271. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000103172.98986.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Belema-Bedada F, Uchida S, Martire A, Kostin S, Braun T. Efficient homing of multipotent adult mesenchymal stem cells depends on FROUNT-mediated clustering of CCR2. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:566–575. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gao D, et al. Endothelial progenitor cells control the angiogenic switch in mouse lung metastasis. Science. 2008;319:195–198. doi: 10.1126/science.1150224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Flanders KC, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta 1: histochemical localization with antibodies to different epitopes. J. Cell Biol. 1989;108:653–660. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.2.653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Williams AO, Flanders KC, Saffiotti U. Immunohistochemical localization of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in rats with experimental silicosis, alveolar type II hyperplasia, and lung cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 1993;142:1831–1840. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Barcellos-Hoff MH, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of active transforming growth factor-beta in situ using engineered tissue. Am. J. Pathol. 1995;147:1228–1237. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wan M, et al. Parathyroid hormone signaling through low-density lipoprotein-related protein 6. Genes Dev. 2008;22:2968–2979. doi: 10.1101/gad.1702708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mendez-Ferrer S, et al. Mesenchymal and haematopoietic stem cells form a unique bone marrow niche. Nature. 2010;466:829–834. doi: 10.1038/nature09262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Li MO, Flavell RA. Contextual regulation of inflammation: a duet by transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-10. Immunity. 2008;28:468–476. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang F, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta promotes recruitment of bone marrow cells and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells through stimulation of MCP-1 production in vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:17564–17574. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.013987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Schober A, Knarren S, Lietz M, Lin EA, Weber C. Crucial role of stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha in neointima formation after vascular injury in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Circulation. 2003;108:2491–2497. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000099508.76665.9A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schober A, et al. Crucial role of the CCL2/CCR2 axis in neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury in hyperlipidemic mice involves early monocyte recruitment and CCL2 presentation on platelets. Circ. Res. 2004;95:1125–1133. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000149518.86865.3e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Subramanian P, et al. Lysophosphatidic acid receptors LPA1 and LPA3 promote CXCL12-mediated smooth muscle progenitor cell recruitment in neointima formation. Circ. Res. 2010;107:96–105. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.212647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nemenoff RA, et al. Targeted deletion of PTEN in smooth muscle cells results in vascular remodeling and recruitment of progenitor cells through induction of stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha. Circ. Res. 2008;102:1036–1045. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.169896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wipff PJ, Hinz B. Integrins and the activation of latent transforming growth factor beta1 - an intimate relationship. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2008;87:601–615. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tenney RM, Discher DE. Stem cells, microenvironment mechanics, and growth factor activation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009;21:630–635. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Worthington JJ, Klementowicz JE, Travis MA. TGFbeta: a sleeping giant awoken by integrins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011;36:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Nishimura SL. Integrin-mediated transforming growth factor-beta activation, a potential therapeutic target in fibrogenic disorders. Am. J. Pathol. 2009;175:1362–1370. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.090393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hinz B, Gabbiani G. Fibrosis: recent advances in myofibroblast biology and new therapeutic perspectives. F1000. Biol. Rep. 2010;2:78. doi: 10.3410/B2-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Janssens K, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the latency-associated peptide of TGF-beta 1 cause Camurati-Engelmann disease. Nat. Genet. 2000;26:273–275. doi: 10.1038/81563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Janssens K, ten DP, Ralston SH, Bergmann C, Van HW. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 mutations in Camurati-Engelmann disease lead to increased signaling by altering either activation or secretion of the mutant protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:7718–7724. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208857200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Neptune ER, et al. Dysregulation of TGF-beta activation contributes to pathogenesis in Marfan syndrome. Nat. Genet. 2003;33:407–411. doi: 10.1038/ng1116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Avvedimento EV, Gabrielli A. Stiff and tight skin: a rear window into fibrosis without inflammation. Sci. Transl. Med. 2010;2:23ps13. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Nacher M, Hidalgo A. Fire within the vessels: interactions between blood cells and inflammatory vascular injury. Front Biosci. (Schol. Ed) 2011;3:1089–1100. doi: 10.2741/213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Psaltis PJ, Harbuzariu A, Delacroix S, Holroyd EW, Simari RD. Resident vascular progenitor cells--diverse origins, phenotype, and function. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 2011;4:161–176. doi: 10.1007/s12265-010-9248-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zengin E, et al. Vascular wall resident progenitor cells: a source for postnatal vasculogenesis. Development. 2006;133:1543–1551. doi: 10.1242/dev.02315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







