Abstract
Allylic nitro compounds were synthesized and evaluated as organic sources of nitrite and nitric oxide. Unactivated allylic nitro compounds do not spontaneously release nitrite and nucleophile promoted nitrite release is slow. However, 2-(nitromethyl)-cyclohex-1-ene-3-one spontaneously dissociates in buffer (pH = 7.4) to release nitrite with a kobs = 1.6 × 10−5 s−1. In the presence of L-cysteine, this compound rapidly yields nitrite and reacts with hemoglobin similarly to sodium nitrite. Structural modifications and the nature and amount of nucleophile modulate the rate of nitrite release. In the presence of L-cysteine and ascorbic acid, this compound forms nitric oxide. Together, these results reveal a new structural architecture for the tunable liberation of nitrite and nitric oxide from organic compounds.
Introduction
Nitrite has long been considered a physiologically inert byproduct of nitric oxide (NO) oxidation. However, recent studies suggest that nitrite plays a crucial role in NO-mediated hypoxic vasodilation, cytoprotection from cardiac and liver ischemia-reperfusion injury, and gene expression.1–5 The requirement of oxygen for normal functioning of nitric oxide synthase renders this enzyme ineffective at low oxygen tension and nitrite may assume a role as an important hypoxic source of NO. Deoxyhemoglobin (deoxyHb) reacts with nitrite to generate iron nitrosyl hemoglobin (HbFe(II)–NO) and methemoglobin (metHb, HbFe(III)), essentially functioning as a competent reductant of nitrite to nitric oxide.6–10 Hemoglobin (Hb) may also react with low concentrations of nitrite to generate S-nitrosothiols, another possible mechanism for the maintenance of normal vascular tone.11,12 Additionally, numerous hypoxic reduction pathways exist for the conversion of nitrite to NO mediated by several heme– and thiol– containing enzymes.13–16 For example, respiring mitochondria use ubiquinol to reduce nitrite, while xanthine oxidoreductases, which are structurally similar to bacterial nitrate and nitrite reductases, catalyze nitrite reduction to nitric oxide in the presence of NADH.17 Mild biochemical reductants such as ascorbate, 1,2– and 1,4–dihydroxyphenols, and α–tocopherol mediate nitric oxide formation from nitrite.18 Physiological sources of nitrite include the normal diet, which contains sizeable quantities (0.7 – 181 mg/day) and spontaneous auto-oxidation of endogenously produced nitric oxide (minor).19 Furthermore, the intriguing biochemistry of nitrate has emerged, where the body actively concentrates this simple anion for its conversion to nitrite (via commensal bacteria in the mouth) and ultimately NO in the stomach.20 Hence, nitrite represents a major intravascular storage pool of NO and plays a pivotal role in nitric oxide biology.
Nitrite has been proposed as a potential therapeutic in the treatment of various diseases, including neonatal pulmonary hypertension, subarachnoid hemorrhage associated with vasospasm, and sickle cell disease underscoring the importance of exogenous sources of nitrite.21, 22 The use of inorganic nitrites precludes both controlled delivery and regulation of nitrite bioavailability and these drawbacks may limit its utility as a therapy. We propose the use of allylic nitro compounds as organic sources of nitrite as an initial strategy to solve the aforementioned problems. The development of organic donors will support our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of nitrite/nitric oxide biology. Furthermore, such compounds may form the basis of novel therapeutic agents and could provide access to versatile NO-based therapeutics including direct reduction to NO (path a, Scheme 1), conversion to S-nitrosothiols (path b, Scheme 1), and formation of iron nitrosylated heme proteins (path c, Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.

Organic nitro compounds present an attractive approach to access a range of nitrite release profiles through simple nucleophilic displacement of the nitro group. In the presence of soft nucleophiles, allylic nitro compounds undergo nucleophilic substitution of the nitro group, presumably accompanied by nitrite release (Scheme 2). 23, 24
Scheme 2.
Nucleophilic substitution of allylic nitro compounds
Allylic nitro compounds undergo regioselective nucleophilic substitution to directly form nitrite but not nitric oxide.23–25 The reactivity pattern of nitrite release may be modified by altering the nature and amount of nucleophile or the substitution around the carbon bearing the nitro group. We wish to describe results at developing allylic nitro compounds as sources of nitrite and nitric oxide through such substitution and reduction pathways, preliminary mechanistic studies, and the examination of the reactions of these compounds with hemoglobin.
Results and Discussion
Allylic nitro compounds 1, 2, and 3 were prepared from the corresponding ketones and nitromethane as previously described.24 Considering direct nucleophilic substitution (SN2) as a potential operating mechanism of nitrite release, the rate and amount of nitrite formed over time should decrease as the size of the α– substituent increases. In order to test this idea, compounds 4 and 5 with a methyl and ethyl group as geminal substituents on the C-nitro group were synthesized.24 Compound 6 was also prepared as a prototype to examine effects of electronic perturbation on nitrite release (Chart 1).24
Chart 1.
Some allylic nitro compounds as candidate nitrite donors.
Due to the poor aqueous solubility of compounds 1 – 6, preliminary investigations were conducted in DMSO. Incubation of allylic nitro compounds (1 – 6, 0.1 M in DMSO) at 37 °C for several days failed to result in nitric oxide or nitrite formation as judged by chemiluminescence spectroscopy suggesting that DMSO does not promote nitrite release. Addition of nucleophiles (1 equivalent) to solutions of 1 – 6 in DMSO yielded nitrite. Specifically, nucleophile-assisted nitrite release from 1 followed the order thiolate > thioacetate ≫ azide > iodide > no nucleophile (Figure 1a). Using phenyl thiolate as a model nucleophile, nitrite release from various allylic nitro compounds was examined (Figure 1b). Increasing steric bulk on the C-nitro carbon retarded nitrite release as evidenced by the diminished yields of nitrite from 4 and 5 compared to 1. Ring size did not affect nitrite release as revealed by comparable nitrite yields from 1, 2, and 3. A vicinal aromatic ring promoted nitrite release as indicated by greater amounts of nitrite released by 6 when treated with thiolate than the rest of the substrates tested. These trends in reactivity remain consistent over several days suggesting substitution of the nitro group as the major operative pathway for nitrite release (Figure 1b). Preliminary kinetic studies support a second-order nitrite release process (Supporting Information).
Figure 1.
(a) Nitrite release from 1 (0.1 M) treated with various nucleophiles (1 eq.) at 37 °C in DMSO (b) Time course of nitrite release from 0.1 M solutions of 1 – 6 treated with 1 eq. PhSNa in DMSO at 37 °C.
The poor aqueous solubility and slow nitrite release profiles of the allylic nitro compounds 1 – 6 limit their utility as nitrite donors (the most efficient source of nitrite was 6, which in the presence of phenyl thiolate yielded 40 % of nitrite over 4 days). However, these studies show that allylic nitro compounds can release nitrite and provide insight on potential structural modifications that could accelerate nitrite release. A suitably placed electron-withdrawing group may enhance the ability to release nitrite by making the carbon bearing the nitro group more susceptible to nucleophilic attack. α–Nitroalkyl enones undergo regioselective substitution by soft nucleophiles under mild conditions.25 For example, 2-(nitromethyl)-cyclohex-1-ene-3-one (7) reacts with sodium phenyl thiolate in DMF to give 2-(phenylthiomethyl)- cyclohex-1-ene-3-one in 70 % yield (Scheme 3).25 The allylic nitro compound 7 and 2-(nitromethyl)-cyclohept-1-ene-3-one (8) were synthesized by literature methods from 1 and 3, respectively (Scheme 3).25 The structural resemblance of these nitrite donor candidates to the NO donor FK 409, an allylic nitro compound that spontaneously dissociates to form both nitric oxide and nitrite in buffer, is noteworthy (Chart 2).26–30
Scheme 3.
Nucleophilic displacement of nitrite from 7 by PhSNa and synthesis of 7, 8 from 1, 3.
Chart 2.

Structure of FK 409
Allylic nitro compound 7 dissolves in nitrite-free milliQ water and DMSO (≤6 %). Negligible amounts of nitrite were detected from this solution after several hours at 25 °C. However, spontaneous nitrite release from 7 occurred in a buffered solution. Incubation of 7 in 0.1 M, pH 7.4 phosphate buffer (PB) produced 16 % of nitrite after 4 and 51 % after 30 h at 25 °C (Figure 2a). Under the same conditions, 8 gave lower yields of nitrite, possibly due to the greater conformational flexibility (and poor π-orbital overlap) of the seven-membered ring leading to reduced activation of the carbon bearing the nitro group towards nucleophilic substitution by the conjugated ketone. Under pseudo-first-order conditions, the time course of nitrite release from 7 in PB (0.1 M, pH 7.4) showed a predictable pattern of nitrite release with an observed rate of nitrite release of 1.6 × 10−5 s−1 (Figure 2b). Nitrite yields from 7 in Tris buffer were similar to those in PB of comparable molarity and pH (data not shown). These results confirm the ability of allylic nitro compounds to release nitrite in a buffered solution.
Figure 2.
(a) Comparison of nitrite release from 7 and 8 in 0.1 M pH 7.4 buffer (b) Time course of nitrite release from 7 in 0.1 M pH 7.4 phosphate buffer (c) Comparison of nitrite release from 7 in 0.1 M PB of varying pH (d) Comparison of nitrite release from 7 in PB of varying ionic strength at neutral pH.
Nitrite release is sensitive to pH and hydroxide ion concentration. Incubation of 7 in PB (0.1 M) of varying pH showed increased yields of nitrite as a function of pH as judged by chemiluminescence detection. Increased basicity led to greater yields of nitrite until neutral pH, after which point the yield of nitrite remained nearly constant (Figure 2c). In milliQ water, only 3 % of nitrite was observed after 30 h showing that nitrite release depends on both pH and ionic strength. The addition of 7 to milliQ water did not alter the pH of the solution. Varying the buffer molarity at constant pH provided further evidence for the importance of ionic strength (and hydroxide ion in the buffer-mediated decomposition) for nitrite release from 7 (Figure 2d). Both chemiluminescence and electron paramagnetic resonance analysis (data not shown) failed to provide evidence of nitric oxide formation from 7 under these conditions demonstrating that 7 is a selective source of nitrite.
Nitrite release from allylic nitro compounds also depended on the presence and the amount of added nucleophile. Treatment of 7 with one equivalent of phenyl thiolate or thioacetate in milliQ water afforded nearly quantitative yields of nitrite in 30 minutes, but under the same conditions, the weaker nucleophiles phenyl sulfinate and azide gave diminished nitrite yields (Fig 3a). The biologically relevant nucleophile, L-cysteine, facilitated nitrite release from 7 as a function of pH and generated nitrite under neutral and basic buffered solutions. Addition of L-cysteine (1 eq.) to 7 at pH 7.0 and 8.7 resulted in quantitative yields of nitrite in 5 minutes (Figure 3b). Similar experiments at pH 4.6 gave only 1 % nitrite after 5 minutes indicating a role for the thiolate ion (Figure 3b). During the same time period, treatment of 7 with other amino acids in pH 7.4 PB gave considerably lower yields of nitrite (< 10 %) revealing the importance of the thiol group as a nucleophile in nitrite formation. However, over 1 hour, incubation of 7 with these amino acids produced significant amounts of nitrite compared to buffer suggesting potential roles of the carboxylate or amino groups in nitrite formation (Figure 3c).
Figure 3.
(a) Nitrite release from 7 in milliQ water upon treatment with various nucleophiles (b) Effect of L-cysteine on nitrite release from 7 in milliQ water and 0.1 M PB of varying pH (c) Effect of added amino acid on nitrite release from 7 in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PB. (d) Effect of added protected amino acid on nitrite release from 7 in 0.1 M pH 7.4 PB. *Nitrite measurements done after 5 min.
Independent treatment of 7 with 1 eq. of N-acetyl cysteine, L-methionine, and N-acetyl L-methionine further reveals the requirement of a thiol/thiolate nucleophile for nitrite release. Addition of N-acetyl cysteine and L-cysteine to 7 gives comparable and nearly quantitative nitrite in 5 min and suggests the dominance of the thiol group over the amino group (Figure 3d). Treatment of 7 with L-methionine gives diminished amounts of nitrite indicating that the thiol group is essential for efficient nitrite release (Figure 3d). Finally, the lack of participation of the carboxylate group in nucleophilic displacement was inferred by the observation of negligible amounts of nitrite from the reaction of 7 with N-acetyl methionine (Figure 3d). These results clearly indicate that nitrite release from these compounds can be controlled by the relative amount and type of nucleophile present and provide a useful tool for controlled nitrite release.
The release of nitrite from 7 occurs through substitution of the nitro group by a suitable nucleophile (Scheme 4). The products of regioselective nitrite displacement of 7 by various nucleophiles have been isolated and characterized previously.25 In our hands, the exclusive formation of 2-(azidomethyl)-cyclohex-1-ene-3-one, the product of nucleophilic displacement of nitrite from 7 by sodium azide was observed (Supporting Information). Similarly, NMR studies of the incubation of 7 with L-cysteine in pD 7.4 PB also support this claim (Supporting Information).31 The thiol group of L-cysteine is the dominant nucleophilic species but a role for the amino group cannot be completely excluded. The absence of nitrite formation from 7 and L-cysteine in milliQ water or at pH 4.6 indicates the requirement of a suitable nucleophile for nitrite formation. Previous work demonstrated that radical transfer processes (SRN1) in nucleophilic substitution of allylic nitro compounds were not important.25 While the observation of the dependence of nitrite release rate on the size of the geminal substituent of the C-nitro group in allylic nitro compounds favors direct nitrite displacement (SN2), pathways that consist of two sequential allylic substitutions (SN2′) cannot be excluded.
Scheme 4.
Proposed SN2-type mechanism of nitrite release from 7.
Nitrite generated from the allylic nitro compound 7 reacted with heme proteins, thiols, and reductants in a similar fashion as sodium nitrite, giving further evidence of 7’s ability to act as a nitrite donor. For example, under the careful exclusion of oxygen, the reaction of nitrite with deoxyhemoglobin produces HbFe(II)–NO and methemoglobin in an approximately 1:1 ratio.32 A similar spectral pattern was observed when 7 (100 mM) reacted with deoxyHb (≈ 3.3 mM) in buffer over 8 h (Figure 4a). The fact that only 16 % of nitrite was formed from the spontaneous dissociation of 7 in buffer after 16 h reconciled the observed incomplete reaction of deoxyhemoglobin under these conditions. OxyHb also reacted with sodium nitrite to form methemoglobin with characteristic spectral features.9 Reaction of oxyHb (3.47 mM) with 7 (100 mM) in pH 7.4 PB (0.1 M) produced these characteristic gradual decreases in absorbances at 540 nm and 576 nm with concomitant increases in absorbances at 630 nm and 496 nm over 4 h (Figure 4b). This spectral behavior mimicked the sodium nitrite–mediated transformation of Hb to metHb as reported by Doyle and coworkers.9 Again, the addition of L-cysteine to the reaction of 7 with deoxyHb and oxyHb greatly enhanced the rate of reaction further illustrating the ability of thiols to induce nitrite release from these allylic nitro compounds. (Supporting Information).33–35
Figure 4.
Spectral features of (a) deoxyHb treated with 7 (0.1 M) in buffer (b) oxyHb treated with 7 (0.1 M) in buffer.
Under acidic conditions, nitrite reacts with thiols to form S-nitrosothiols, which have been postulated as important physiological storage forms of nitric oxide.36 Reaction of 7 with L-cysteine (1 eq.) in pH 7.4 PB followed by treatment with acidified-cysteine formed a red solution with a characteristic spectral pattern for S-nitrosocysteine (λmax = 542 nm).37 Chemiluminescence assay also independently confirmed the formation of S-nitrosothiol. Again, these results support thiol-mediated nitrite release from 7 and reveal the ability of allylic nitro compounds to S-nitrosate a thiol in a manner similar to inorganic nitrite.
Finally and perhaps most importantly in terms of biology, these allylic nitro compounds act as nitric oxide prodrugs under mild reducing conditions, as would be expected of a nitrite donor. Ascorbic acid comprises an important component of gastric juice and is a vital component in the physiological nitric oxide generation from nitrite. Several reports employ nitrite and ascorbic acid mixtures as masked NO sources for therapeutic purposes.38–39 For example, mixtures of sodium nitrite and ascorbic acid blocked the growth of Streptococus mutans.40 The reaction of ascorbic acid with 7 in pH 7.0 PB yielded nitric oxide, as detected by chemiluminescence headspace analysis (≈ 0.1 %). At pH 7.0, in the presence of L-cysteine, even higher amounts of NO (≈ 3 %) formed in the reaction headspace after 10 min corroborating nitrite formation and confirming that 7 is a source of nitric oxide. Together, these results demonstrate that allylic nitro compounds, such as 7, can specifically act as a selective source of nitrite (in the presence of thiol) or nitric oxide (in the presence of thiol and ascorbic acid). This compartmentalized reactivity makes these compounds mechanistically-unique nitrite donors.
Summary
Allylic nitro compounds dissociate in buffer to release nitrite with vastly different rate profiles that depend on the nature and relative amount of nucleophile and by the steric and electronic perturbations of the carbon framework. The addition of an electron-withdrawing group enhances nitrite release, particularly in the presence of sulfur nucleophiles. Allylic nitro compound 7 behaved as a stable precursor to both nitrite and nitric oxide. This compound released nitrite in buffer and the addition of L-cysteine increases the rate of nitrite release. Compound 7 also reacted with hemoglobin in a similar fashion to sodium nitrite and S-nitrosated thiols under acidic conditions. Reaction of 7 with ascorbic acid in the presence of L-cysteine generates nitric oxide showing that this three-component mixture represents a unique system for nitric oxide formation. These findings reveal allylic nitro compounds as a new group of nitrite/nitric oxide sources that have tunable release profiles making them potentially useful in the development of therapeutic agents.
Experimental Section
NMR spectra were recorded on a 300 MHz Bruker NMR spectrometer. Nitromethane, nitroethane, 1-nitropropane, cyclopentanone, cyclohexanone, cycloheptanone, 1-phenylpropanone, sodium nitrite, sodium phenyl thiolate, L-cysteine·HCl, L-methione, L-proline, L-alanine, L-serine, N-acetyl-L-cysteine, N-acetyl-L-methionine, sodium phenyl sulfinate, potassium thioacetate, sodium azide, sodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, 3-chloroperoxybenzoic acid, 2,2′-dimethyl ethylenediamine, triethylamine, pyridinium chlorochromate, ascorbic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Hexanes, ethyl acetate, methylene chloride, acetonitrile, dimethyl sulfoxide, ethanol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Compounds 1 – 8 were prepared by known methods, and spectrally characterized before use.24–26 Plots were generated and analyzed using the curve fitting program of Origin 5.0 and the R2 values of linear fits are reported.
Nitrite Analysis
Test compounds were weighed into vials (3 mL), sealed with rubber septa and deoxygenated with argon for 20 minutes. Compounds 1 – 6 were dissolved in DMSO (100 mM) while compounds 7 and 8 were dissolved in milliQ water or buffer (various pH or molarity) containing ≈5 % DMSO to give final concentrations of 5 – 10 mM. The samples were incubated at 37 °C (1 – 6) or 25 °C (7 and 8) and aliquots (50 μL) of the reaction solutions were periodically injected into the reaction chamber of a Sievers 280 Nitric Oxide Analyzer (NOA). For nitrite analysis, the reaction chamber contained 1% w/v potassium iodide in glacial acetic acid, a solution that reduces nitrite to NO. For experiments involving nucleophile additives, equimolar solutions of the nucleophile (in milliQ water or buffer) and the allylic nitro compound (in DMSO) were mixed and then diluted with the milliQ water or buffer of suitable molarity and pH to give a final concentration of 5 – 10 mM. For example, independent solutions of L-cysteine (23 mg, 0.13 mmol) in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer (1 mL) and 7 (21 mg, 0.13 mmol) in DMSO (1 mL) were prepared. Aliquots (50 μL) of both these solutions were placed in a vial and diluted with pH 7.4 phosphate buffer (900 μL) to give a final concentration of 7 mM.
Nitric oxide analysis
Nitric oxide analyses were carried out using the same experimental procedure as nitrite analysis except that aliquots (250 μL) of the reaction headspace and solution were injected into the reaction chamber that only contained milliQ water (2 mL). For these experiments, solutions of the allylic nitro compounds and nucleophile were generally 20 mM.
Hemoglobin Preparation
Normal adult hemoglobin was prepared as described earlier.41 The hemoglobin sample was pelleted in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 ° C. Hemoglobin samples used for experiments were thawed and used within 24 h. Thawed hemoglobin samples were further centrifuged to remove any precipitated or denatured protein. The absence of denatured protein was confirmed by absorption spectroscopy. Deoxyhemoglobin was formed by gently flowing argon over a solution of oxyHb in argon-saturated buffer in a cuvette with a rubber septum until the absorption spectrum showed the complete removal of oxygen.
Absorption Spectroscopy
Hemoglobin solutions (3.47 mM in heme) in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) were treated with 7 or 8 (100 mM) and placed in a cuvette under anaerobic conditions. Readings were taken every 30 min for 12 h on a Cary 100 UV-vis spectrometer at 25 °C. Similar experiments were performed in the presence of L-cysteine (1 eq.) with spectra being recorded every 1 min for 90 min. Similar experiments were performed with oxyhemoglobin. Mixtures of L-cysteine with oxyHb and deoxyHb over the reported time periods provided controls.
S-Nitrosothiol formation
A solution of L-cysteine (50 μL, 0.13 M in pH 7.0 PB) and 7 (50 μL, 0.12 M in DMSO) were diluted in a spectrophotometric vial was treated with and 100 μL aqueous solution of L-cysteine (1 M in milliQ water) acidified with 2 – 3 drops of dilute HCl. The resulting solution rapidly turned red and the UV-visible spectrum was recorded. Aliquots (50 μL) of this solution were injected into the NOA reaction chamber containing L-cysteine (3 M) and CuCl (100 μM) in pH 7.0 PB. This system converts S-nitrosothiols to NO.
Ascorbic Acid Experiments
A solution of ascorbic acid (100 μL, 2 M in pH 7.4 PB) was added to a solution of 7 (50 μL, 2 M in DMSO) at 25 °C and diluted with 400 μL pH 7.4 PB. After 1 h, an aliquot (250 μL) of the headspace was injected into the reaction chamber containing only milliQ water to determine NO release. The experiment with L-cysteine was conducted in a similar fashion, except that a solution of 50 μL L-cysteine (2M in pH 7.4 PB) was added before the ascorbic acid and headspace NO was recorded after 10 min. Controls using sodium nitrite and ascorbic acid give similar results of nitric oxide release by chemiluminesence.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (HL 62198, SBK). The NMR spectrometers used in this work were purchased with partial support from NSF (CHE-9708077) and the North Carolina Biotechnology Center (9703-IDG-1007).
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available. Kinetic analysis of nitrite release from 1 – 6, UV-vis spectrum of the reaction of 7 with deoxyHb and Hb in the presence of L-cysteine, NMR spectra of the reaction of 7 with sodium azide and L-cysteine, and the complete list of authors for ref 1 and 7. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Gladwin MT, et al. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1:308–314. doi: 10.1038/nchembio1105-308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dejam A, Hunter CJ, Schecheter AN, Gladwin MT. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2004;32:423–429. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2004.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bryan NS, Fernandez BO, Bauer SM, Garcia-Saura MF, Milsom AB, Rassaf T, Maloney RE, Bharti A, Rodriguez J, Feelisch M. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1:290–297. doi: 10.1038/nchembio734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Webb A, Bond R, Mclean P, Uppal R, Benjamin N, Ahluwalia A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:13683–13688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402927101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Duranski M, Greer J, Dejam A, Jaganmohan S, Hogg N, Langston W, Patel R, Yet S, Wang X, Kevil C, Gladwin M, Lefer D. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1232–1240. doi: 10.1172/JCI22493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim-Shapiro DB, Gladwin MT, Patel RP, Hogg N. J Inorg Biochem. 2005;99:237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.10.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cosby K, et al. Nat Med. 2003;12:1498–1505. doi: 10.1038/nm954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brooks J. Proc Royal Soc B. 1937;123:368–382. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Doyle MP, Pickering RA, Deweert TM, Hoekstra JW, Pater D. J Biol Chem. 1981;256:12393–12398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huang Z, Shiva S, Kim-Shapiro D, Patel R, Ringwood L, Irby C, Huang K, Ho C, Hogg N, Schechter A, Gladwin M. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:2099–2107. doi: 10.1172/JCI24650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nagababu E, Ramasamy S, Rifkind JM. Nitric Oxide Biol Chem. 2006;15:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2006.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Angelo M, Singel DJ, Stamler JS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:8366–8371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600942103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, Lundberg JM, Alving K. Gut. 1994;35:1543–1546. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.11.1543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Benjamin N, O’driscoll F, Dougall H, Duncan C, Smith L, Golden M, Mckenzie H. Nature. 1994;370:25–26. doi: 10.1038/368502a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li H, Samouilov A, Liu X, Zweier JL. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:16939–16946. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M314336200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kozlov AV, Staniek K, Nohl H. FEBS Lett. 1999;454:127–130. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00788-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gangolli SD, Van Der Brandt PA, Feron VJ, Janowsky C, Koeman JH, Speijers GJ, Spiegelhalder B, Walker R, Wisnok JS. Eur J Pharmacol. 1994;292:1–38. doi: 10.1016/0926-6917(94)90022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bartsch H, Ohshima H, Pignatelli B. Mutat Res. 1988;202:307–324. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(88)90194-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sies H, Sharov VS, Klotz LO, Briviba K. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:27812–27817. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.44.27812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, Cole JA, Benjamin N. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:593–602. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pluta RM, Dejam A, Grimes G, Gladwin MT, Oldfield EH. J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293:1477–1484. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.12.1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hunter CJ, Dejam A, Blood AB, Shields H, Kim-Shapiro DB, Machado RF, Tarekegn S, Mulla N, Hopper AO, Schecheter AN, Power GG, Gladwin MT. Nat Medicine. 2004;10:1122–1127. doi: 10.1038/nm1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tamura R, Kamimura A, Ono N. Synthesis. 1991:423–434. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ono N, Hamamoto I, Yanai T, Kaji A. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1985:523–524. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tamura R, Katayama H, Watabe K, Suzuki H. Tetrahedron. 1990;46:7557–7568. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ohtsuka M, Hombo T, Esumi K. Cardiovascular Drug Rev. 1994;12:2–15. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yoshida K, Yasuhiro K. Curr Med Chem. 2005;5:675–685. doi: 10.2174/1568026054679308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shinichi F, Yoshimi H, Yasuko K, Mie N, Mitsuko O, Shigetaka N, Kazuhiro M, Masayuki K, Yasuhiro K. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;282:236–242. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Decout JL, Roy B, Fontecave M, Muller JC, Williams PH, Loyaux D. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1995;5:973–978. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fukuyama S, Kita Y, Hirasawa Y, Sato A, Morokoshi N, Koda S, Yasuda T, Oka S, Sakurai H. Free Rad Res. 1995;23:443–452. doi: 10.3109/10715769509065265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.(a) Hamilton DS, Zhang X, Dang Z, Hubatsch I, Mannervik B, Houk KN, Ganem B, Creighton DJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:15049–15058. doi: 10.1021/ja030396p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Joseph E, Eiseman JL, Hamilton DS, Wang H, Tak H, Ding Z, Ganem B, Creighton DJ. J Med Chem. 2003;46:194–196. doi: 10.1021/jm0203027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huang KT, Keszler A, Patel N, Patel RP, Gladwin MT, Kim-Shapiro DB, Hogg N. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:31126–31131. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501496200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Suschek CV, Schewe T, Sies H, Kroncke KD. Biol Chem. 2006;387:499–506. doi: 10.1515/BC.2006.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Weller R. Exp Derm. 2003;28:511–514. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2230.2003.01365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ormerod AD, White MI, Shah SAA, Benjamin N. Brit J Dermatol. 1999;141:1051–1053. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.03204.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Williams DLH. Acc Chem Res. 1999;32:869–876. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wink DA, Kim S, Coffin D, Cook JC, Vodovotz Y, Christodoulou D, Jourd’heuil D, Grisham MB. Methods Enzymol. 1999;301:201–211. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(99)01083-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Carlsson S, Weitzberg E, Wiklund P, Lundberg JO. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:2352–2355. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.6.2352-2355.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Carlsson S, Govoni M, Wiklund P, Weitzberg E, Lundberg JO. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:3713–3718. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.12.3713-3718.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Radcliffe CE, Lamb R, Blinkhorn AS, Drucker DB. J Dent. 2003;31:367–370. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Huang J, Kim-Shapiro DB, King SB. J Med Chem. 2004;47:3495–3501. doi: 10.1021/jm030547z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.








