Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2012 Sep 24;134(40):16449–16451. doi: 10.1021/ja305448w

Direct Stereospecific Amination of Alkyl and Aryl Pinacol Boronates

Scott N Mlynarski 1, Alexander S Karns 1, James P Morken 1,*
PMCID: PMC3481838  NIHMSID: NIHMS410230  PMID: 23002712

Abstract

The direct amination of alkyl and aryl pinacol boronates is accomplished with lithiated methoxyamine. This reaction directly provides aliphatic and aromatic amines, stereospecifically, and without preactivation of the boronate substrate.


The tremendous range of transformations available to organoboron reagents renders these compounds strategically useful in organic synthesis.1 Amongst classes of boron compounds, boronic acid pinacol esters have received a great deal of attention from the catalysis community. While the stability of pinacol boronates facilitates their handling and allows them to be used under a broad range of reaction conditions, this stability comes at a price: many of the transformations that apply to electrophilic boranes are inaccessible with pinacol boronates. This feature especially pertains to the direct stereospecific amination of alkyl pinacol boronate esters.2 Whereas alkyl azides, chloroamines, and hydroxylamine derivatives are effective at amination of dichloroboranes,3 difluoroboranes,4 dialkylborinates,5 or trialkylboranes6, these reagents are unreactive with common boronic esters.7 In this report, we describe a solution to this problem and present a simple method for the direct stereospecific amination of alkyl pinacol boronates. To the best of our knowledge, this advance represents the only method for direct conversion of common pinacol boronates to alkylamine products.

As depicted in Scheme 1, stereoretentive amination of organoboron compounds is generally achieved by conversion of the trivalent boron reagent to a tetravalent boron “ate” complex derived from the amination reagent; subsequent 1,2-metallate rearrangement results in C-N bond formation and delivers the alkylamine product.8 We considered that the lack of reactivity between common amination reagents (i.e. alkyl azides) and pinacol boronates may be traced to ineffective association of the two reagents. Indeed, as alluded to above, one solution to the amination of boronate esters involves conversion of the boronate to a dichloroborane, difluoroborane or trialkylborane intermediate; the enhanced Lewis acidity of the resulting boron center enables association with the weak Lewis base and facilitates reaction. As an alternative to the preactivation described above, we considered that more nucleophilic amination reagents might overcome the decreased Lewis acidity of the pinacol ester, favoring ate complex formation, and perhaps allow direct amination of pinacol boronates.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

A study by Beak suggested that lithiated alkoxy amines, intermediates in the amination of alkyllithiums, might possess features appropriate to direct amination of alkyl boroantes.9 These reagents bear a labile alkoxide leaving group while still possessing an electron-rich nitrogen center. In a preliminary experiment (entry 1, Table 1), octylB(pin) was added to a pre-cooled (−78 °C) mixture of methoxyamine (1.0 equiv) and n-BuLi (1.0 equiv) in THF. After allowing the mixture to warm to ambient temperature, it was heated to 60 °C for 12 hours and then treated with Boc2O.10 Under these reaction conditions, Boc-protected octylamine was generated in 41% yield; however, it was contaminated with 36% yield of Boc-protected butylamine, presumably generated by amination of butyllithium. Assuming that amination of butyllithium occured competively during the deprotonation of methoxyamine and was unavoidable, the use of increased amounts of the amination mixture was examined. As shown in entries 2 and 3, this strategy resulted in a significant improvement in product yields such that with 3 equivalents of MeONH2 and n-BuLi, the amination of octylB(pin) occurred in 84% isolated yield. As shown by the remaining entries in Table 1, other bases are also able to affect amination, however, none surpass the efficacy of n-BuLi for this transformation. Also of note is that the amination conditions employ elevated temperature (60 °C) for 12 hours; at lower temperatures or for shorter reaction times, inferior yields resulted (<5 % yield for entry 3 at 22 °C).

Table 1.

Amination of OctylB(pin).a

graphic file with name nihms410230u1.jpg
entry CH3ONH2 (equiv) base (equiv) yield (%)
1 1.0 n-BuLi (1.0) 41
2 2.0 n-BuLi (2.0) 72
3 3.0 n-BuLi (3.0) 84
4 3.0 MeLi (3.0) 48
5 3.0 NaH (3.0) <5
6 3.0 KH (3.0) <5
7 3.0 K(OtBu) (3.0) 16
8 3.0 Li(OtBu) (3.0) <5
a

Reactions were conducted as described in the text. The percent value given refers to the isolated yield of purified material and is an average of two experiments.

Once optimized conditions were established for the boronate amination, the scope of this transformation was investigated. As shown in Table 2, the amination proved to be effective over a range of substrates. Notably, octylB(pin) was aminated on a scale relevant to preparative organic synthesis (1 gram) and proceeded equally well compared to smaller scale experiments. Also of note, benzyl ethers, silyl ethers, and acetals appear to be tolerated in the reaction (compounds 24). While nitrile functional groups are tolerated (compound 6), the yield is diminished with these substrates even though the starting material is completely consumed. It is also clear that the reaction is not perturbed by the presence of pendant alkenes, including those that are distal and those are adajcent to the boronate. Importantly, both cis- and trans- allylic boronates react cleanly without any observed isomerization of the olefin geometry (compounds 9 and 10). In terms of utility in stereoselective synthesis, it is also important that the amination operates on secondary boronates (compound 11); however, when tertiary substrates were employed (compound 12), the product was not detected.

Table 2.

Substrate Scope of Alkyl Pinacol Boronate Amination.a

graphic file with name nihms410230f2.jpg
a

Reactions were conducted as described in the text. The percent value given refers to the isolated yield of purified material and is an average of two experiments.

b

This experiment was conducted on 1 gram scale.

c

An additional 15% yield of the bis(Boc)-protected amine could be isolated from this experiment.

The amination of pinacol boronates using methoxyamine is not limited to aliphatic substrates. Although prolonged reaction times are required, aryl boronates are also suitable substrates producing aniline derivatives. This reaction represents a metal-free alterative to Chan-Lam-Evans couplings between boronates and ammonia.11 As depicted in Table 3, while steric encumbrance does not appear to have a significant effect on the efficiency of the amination (cf. 13, 15 and 22), the reaction appears to be much more sensitive to the electronic properties of the aryl ring. The observation that electron-rich substrates undergo amination more efficiently than electron-poor aryl-boronates (cf. 19 and 21) suggests that 1,2-metallate rearrangement is likely the slow step in the reaction sequence. Lastly, B(pin)-substituted heterocycles (4-borylpyridine, 2-borylfuran, 3-borylfuran, and 3-borylthiophene) failed to give the amination product (data not shown).

Table 3.

Substrate Scope of Aryl Pinacol Boronate Amination.a

graphic file with name nihms410230f3.jpg
a

Reactions were conducted as described in the text. The percent value given refers to the isolated yield of purified material and is an average of two experiments.

In line with the mechanism proposed in Scheme 1, it may be anticipated that B N bond migration would be stereospecific and preserve the configuration at the migrating carbon atom. To test this hypothesis, boronate (R)-23a, prepared in 83% ee by copper-Me-DuPhos catalyzed hydroboration of styrene,12 was subjected to the amination reaction (equation 1). This transformation provided Boc-protected α-methyl benzylamine 23b in 83% enantiomeric excess and in the (R) configuration. Thus, the amination is stereospecific and occurs with retention of configuration at carbon. In related experiments, amination of exo-norbornyl boronate 24a (equation 2) provided exo-norbornyl amine 24b, and amination of chiral aliphatic boronate 25a provided 25b with retention of configuration.

graphic file with name nihms410230e1.jpg (1)
graphic file with name nihms410230e2.jpg (2)
graphic file with name nihms410230e3.jpg (3)

In conclusion, we report a stereospecific method for the direct conversion of alkyl and aryl pinacol boronates to amines. This transformation exhibits a broad substrate scope and can be run on gram scale without additional complications.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

The NIH (GM-59471) is acknowledged for financial support; AllyChem (B2(pin)2) and BASF (pinacolborane) are acknowledged for donations of reagents. SNM is grateful for a LaMattina Fellowship.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supporting Information. Procedures, characterization and spectral data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Reviews: Brown HC, Kramer GW, Levy AB, Midland MM. Organic Syntheses via Boranes. Wiley-Interscience; New York: 1975. Brown HC, Singaram B. Acc Chem Res. 1988;21:287.Crudden CM, Edwards D. Eur J Org Chem. 2003:4695.
  • 2.For recent examples of aminations that are either not stereospecific, or where stereochemistry was not studied or not an issue, see: Ou L, Shao J, Zhang G, Yu Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:1430.Matsuda N, Hirano K, Satoh T, Miura M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2012;51:3642. doi: 10.1002/anie.201108773.Larrosa M, Guerrero C, Rodríguez R, Cruces J. Synlett. 2010:2101.Cazorla C, Métay E, Andrioletti B, Lemaire M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:6855.Rucker RP, Whittaker AM, Dang H, Lalic G. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:6571. doi: 10.1021/ja3023829.
  • 3.(a) Brown HC, Midland MM, Levy AB. J Am Chem Soc. 1973;95:2394. [Google Scholar]; (b) Brown HC, Salunkhe AM, Argade AB. Organometallics. 1992;11:3094. [Google Scholar]; (c) Carboni B, Vaultier M, Carrie R. Tetrahedron. 1987;43:1799. [Google Scholar]; (d) Carboni B, Vaultier M, Carrie R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988;29:1279. [Google Scholar]; (e) Hupe E, Marek I, Knochel P. Org Lett. 2002;4:2861. doi: 10.1021/ol0262486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Matteson DS, Kim GY. Org Lett. 2002;4:2153. doi: 10.1021/ol025973d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kim BJ, Matteson DS. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:3056. doi: 10.1002/anie.200453690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bagutski V, Elford TG, Aggarwal VK. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:1080. doi: 10.1002/anie.201006037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brown HC, Kim KW, Cole TE, Singaram B. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:6761. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Brown HC, Kim KW, Srebnik M, Singaram B. Tetrahedron. 1987;43:4071. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fernandez E, Hooper MW, Knight FI, Brown JM. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1997:171. [Google Scholar]; (c) Fernandez E, Maeda K, Hooper MW, Brown JM. Chem Eur J. 2000;6:1840. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3765(20000515)6:10<1840::aid-chem1840>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Brown HC, Heydkamp WR, Breuer E, Murphy WS. J Am Chem Soc. 1964;86:3565. [Google Scholar]; (e) Rathke MW, Inoue N, Varma V, Brown HC. J Am Chem Soc. 1966;88:2870. [Google Scholar]; (f) Hoffmann RW, Holzer B, Knopff O. Org Lett. 2001;3:1945. doi: 10.1021/ol0160248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Kabalka GW, Henderson DA, Varma RS. Organometallics. 1987;6:1369. [Google Scholar]; (h) Kabalka GW, Sastry KA, McCollum GW, Yoshioka H. J Org Chem. 1981;46:4296. [Google Scholar]; (i) Phanstiel IVO, Wang QX, Powell DH, Ospina MP, Leeson BA. J Org Chem. 1999;64:803. doi: 10.1021/jo981613l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.For a recent strategy for stereospecific C-N bond formation to construct alkylhydrazides and alkyldiazo compounds, see: Larouche-Gauthier R, Elford TG, Aggarwal VK. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:16794. doi: 10.1021/ja2077813.For experiments addressing the direct amination of catecholbonates, see: Knight FI, Brown JM, Lazzari D, Ricci A, Blacker AJ. Tetrahedron. 1997;53:11411.For a recent strategy for indolizidine synthesis involving stereospecific alkylborane amination, see: Pronin SV, Tabor MG, Jansen DJ, Shenvi RA. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:2012. doi: 10.1021/ja211090n.
  • 8.Reviews on 1,2 metallate rearrangments: Aggarwal VK, Fang GY, Ginesta X, Howells DM, Zaja M. Pure Appl Chem. 2006;78:215.Thomas SP, French RM, Jheengut V, Aggarwal VK. Chemical Record. 2009;9:24. doi: 10.1002/tcr.20168.
  • 9.Beak P, Basha A, Kokko B, Loo D. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:6016. doi: 10.1021/ja00279a058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.While the non-protected amine can be isolated, Boc protection allows separation of octylamine from butyl amine by silica gel chromatography.
  • 11.(a) Monaco KL, Wang RP, Winters MP, Chan DMT. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:2933. [Google Scholar]; (b) Katz JL, West TR, Evans DA. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:2937. [Google Scholar]; (c) Lam PYS, Clark CG, Saubern S, Adams J, Winters MP, Chan DMT, Combs A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998;39:2941. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Noh D, Chea H, Ju J, Yun J. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:6062. doi: 10.1002/anie.200902015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES