Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1980 Jan;77(1):157–161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.1.157

Monoclonal antibodies to estrophilin: probes for the study of estrogen receptors.

G L Greene, F W Fitch, E V Jensen
PMCID: PMC348227  PMID: 6928610

Abstract

Splenic lymphocytes from a Lewis rat, immunized with purified estradiol-receptor complex of calf uterine nuclei, were fused with cells of three different mouse myeloma lines (P3-X63-Ag8, P3-NSI/I-Ag4-1, and Sp2/0-Ag14) to yield hybridoma cultures, 9% of which produced antibodies to the receptor protein (estrophilin). When cloned by limiting dilution, approximately 70% of the viable cultures secreted antiestrophilin antibody. When expanded in suspension culture, three clones derived from Sp2/0-Ag14 were found to secrete rat IgG (gamma 2a class), whereas seven other clones (from all three myeloma lines) secreted IgM. Monoclonal IgG shows comparable affinity for nuclear and extranuclear receptors, whereas IgM reacts preferentially with the nuclear form. Both classes of antibody react with unoccupied as well as with occupied receptor and do not interfere with its ability to bind to estradiol. By growing IgG-secreting clones in the presence of [35S]methionine, radiolabeled monoclonal antiestrophilin has been prepared. Unlike antiestrophilin antibody previously generated in the rabbit or the goat, which crossreacts with estrogen receptors from every animal species tested, antibodies produced by the Lewis rat and by hybridomas derived from its spleen cells react specifically with estrophilin from calf tissues. These monoclonal antibodies provide reagents for the application of immunochemical techniques to study estrogen receptors in calf target tissues.

Full text

PDF
157

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bazin H., Beckers A., Querinjean P. Three classes and four (sub)classes of rat immunoglobulins: IgM, IgA, IgE and IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG2c. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Jan;4(1):44–48. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloch K. J., Morse H. C., 3rd, Austen K. F. Biologic properties of rat antibodies. I. Antigen-binding by four classes of anti-DNP antibodies. J Immunol. 1968 Oct;101(4):650–657. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cerottini J. C., Engers H. D., Macdonald H. R., Brunner T. Generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vitro. I. Response of normal and immune mouse spleen cells in mixed leukocyte cultures. J Exp Med. 1974 Sep 1;140(3):703–717. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.3.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cowan N. J., Secher D. S., Milstein C. Intracellular immunoglobulin chain synthesis in non-secreting variants of a mouse myeloma: detection of inactive light-chain messenger RNA. J Mol Biol. 1974 Dec 25;90(4):691–701. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90533-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davidson W. F., Parish C. R. A procedure for removing red cells and dead cells from lymphoid cell suspensions. J Immunol Methods. 1975 Jun;7(2-3):291–300. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(75)90026-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greene G. L., Closs L. E., DeSombre E. R., Jensen E. V. Antibodies to estrophilin: comparison between rabbit and goat antisera. J Steroid Biochem. 1979 Jul;11(1A):333–341. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(79)90316-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greene G. L., Closs L. E., Fleming H., DeSombre E. R., Jensen E. V. Antibodies to estrogen receptor: immunochemical similarity of estrophilin from various mammalian species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Sep;74(9):3681–3685. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.9.3681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Köhler G., Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature. 1975 Aug 7;256(5517):495–497. doi: 10.1038/256495a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LITTLEFIELD J. W. SELECTION OF HYBRIDS FROM MATINGS OF FIBROBLASTS IN VITRO AND THEIR PRESUMED RECOMBINANTS. Science. 1964 Aug 14;145(3633):709–710. doi: 10.1126/science.145.3633.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Little M., Szendro P., Teran C., Hughes A., Jungblut P. W. Biosynthesis and transformation of microsomal and cytosol estradiol receptors. J Steroid Biochem. 1975 Mar-Apr;6(3-4):493–500. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(75)90178-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McKearn T. J., Fitch F. W., Smilek D. E., Sarmiento M., Stuart F. P. Properties of rat anti-MHC antibodies produced by cloned rat-mouse hybridomas. Immunol Rev. 1979;47:91–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1979.tb00290.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Notides A. C., Hamilton D. E., Auer H. E. A kinetic analysis of the estrogen receptor transformation. J Biol Chem. 1975 May 25;250(10):3945–3950. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Palacios R., Palmiter R. D., Schimke R. T. Identification and isolation of ovalbumin-synthesizing polysomes. I. Specific binding of 125 I-anti-ovalbumin to polysomes. J Biol Chem. 1972 Apr 25;247(8):2316–2321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Radanyi C., Redeuilh G., Eigenmann E., Lebeau M. C., Massol N., Secco C., Baulieu E. E., Richard-Foy H. Production et détection d'anticorps antirécepteur de l'oesstradiol d'utérus de veau. Interaction avec le récepteur d'oviducte de poule. C R Seances Acad Sci D. 1979 Jan 15;288(2):255–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shulman M., Wilde C. D., Köhler G. A better cell line for making hybridomas secreting specific antibodies. Nature. 1978 Nov 16;276(5685):269–270. doi: 10.1038/276269a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vaitukaitis J., Robbins J. B., Nieschlag E., Ross G. T. A method for producing specific antisera with small doses of immunogen. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1971 Dec;33(6):988–991. doi: 10.1210/jcem-33-6-988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yamamoto K. R. Characterization of the 4 S and 5 S forms of the estradiol receptor protein and their interaction with deoxyribonucleic acid. J Biol Chem. 1974 Nov 25;249(22):7068–7075. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES