Abstract
Background
Angiotensin II (AngII), the main bioactive peptide of the renin angiotensin system, exerts most of its biological actions through stimulation of AngII type 1 (AT1) receptors. This receptor is expressed as 2 structurally similar subtypes in rodents, termed AT1a and AT1b. Although AT1a receptors have been studied comprehensively, roles of AT1b receptors in the aorta have not been defined.
Methodology/Results
We initially compared the regional distribution of AT1b receptor mRNA with AT1a receptor mRNA in the aorta. mRNA abundance of both subtypes increased from the proximal to the distal aorta, with the greatest abundance in the infra-renal region. Corresponding to the high mRNA abundance for both receptors, only aortic rings from the infra-renal aorta contracted in response to AngII stimulation. Despite the presence of both receptor transcripts, deletion of AT1b receptors, but not AT1a receptors, diminished AngII-induced contractility. To determine whether absence of AT1b receptors influenced aortic pathologies, we bred AT1b receptor deficient mice into an LDL receptor deficient background. Mice were fed a diet enriched in saturated fat and infused with AngII (1,000 ng/kg/min). Parameters that could influence development of aortic pathologies, including systolic blood pressure and plasma cholesterol concentrations, were not impacted by AT1b receptor deficiency. Absence of AT1b receptors also had no effect on size of aortic atherosclerotic lesions and aortic aneurysms in both the ascending and abdominal regions.
Conclusions/Significance
Regional abundance of AT1b receptor mRNA coincided with AngII-induced regional contractility, but it was not associated with AngII-induced aortic pathologies.
Introduction
Angiotensin II (AngII) is the major effector of the renin angiotensin system that exerts its actions predominantly through stimulation of AT1 receptors [1]–[3]. In rodents, this receptor undergoes chromosomal duplication and is expressed as two subtypes, named AngII type 1a (AT1a) and type 1b (AT1b) receptors [4]. These two receptor subtypes are present on different chromosomes, 13 and 3 for AT1a and AT1b in mice, respectively. While AT1a receptors have ubiquitous tissue expression, AT1b receptor expression is more restricted to tissues such as aorta, resistance arteries, adrenal glands, pituitary, and hypothalamus [2], [5]–[8]. The aorta is one of the few tissues that express both subtypes, presumably in medial smooth muscle cells (SMCs) [2].
AT1 receptor subtypes in rodents are highly homologous, both containing 359 amino acids that have 94% similarity [9], [10]. AngII stimulation of both subtypes are inhibited indiscriminately by the sartan class of pharmacological inhibitors [9], [10]. However, the consequences of AngII stimulation of the two subtypes could vary in the same cell type as several of the amino acid differences between the two subtypes are clustered in the intracellular domain of the third loop and the cytoplasmic tail. Despite not being characterized yet, amino acid substitutions in these structural positions have the potential to impart differences on multiple signaling pathways that are invoked by AngII stimulation of AT1 receptors [1].
AngII provokes region-specific effects on the aorta. Ex vivo, this heterogeneity is reflected by differences in AngII promoting aortic contractility with only the abdominal region being responsive [2], [3], [11]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that aortic contraction induced by AngII is restricted to the infra-renal region of the abdominal aorta [3]. However, it is unclear whether this region-specific effect is related to the relative abundance of the receptor subtypes along the length of the aorta.
AngII infusion augments atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic mice [12], [13]. AngII infusion also promotes aortic aneurysms in both the ascending and supra-renal regions, which represent two distinct pathologies [12], [14]. Whole body AT1a receptor deficiency attenuates atherosclerosis and aortic aneurysms in mice infused with AngII [3], [15]. In contrast to AT1a receptors, AT1b receptors regulate calcium signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells of the aorta and blood pressure in response to AngII stimulation [16], [17], indicating a potentially important role of AT1b receptors in vascular diseases. Although AT1b receptors are also an AngII binding receptor that is abundant in the aorta, it has not been determined whether this receptor subtype also influences atherosclerosis and aortic aneurysms in mice infused with AngII.
AT1b receptor mRNA has been detected in the aorta [2]. However, no study has reported whether there are regional differences of AT1b receptor mRNA in the aorta. In the present study, we initially quantified the mRNA abundance of AT1a and AT1b receptors in distinct aortic regions. Both subtypes were primarily expressed in the infra-renal aortic region. Despite the presence of transcripts for both receptors in this region, deletion of AT1b receptors, but not deletion of AT1a receptors, inhibited AngII-induced contractility. In contrast to the major role of AT1a receptors, deletion of the AT1b receptor subtype had no effect on AngII-induced atherosclerosis and aortic aneurysms.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
All mouse studies were performed with approval of the University of Kentucky Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC number: 2006-0009). Pump implantation was conducted using isoflurane inhalation anesthesia, and termination was performed with overdose of ketamine/xylazine. All efforts were taken to minimize suffering to mice in accordance with the University of Kentucky IACUC and the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals per the National Institutes of Health guidelines.
Mice
Male low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor −/− (B6.129S7-ldlrtm1her; Stock# 002207) and AT1a receptor −/− (B6.129P2-Agtr1atm1Unc; Stock# 002682) mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). AT1b receptor −/− mice in a C57BL/6 background were generated at Duke University (Durham, NC, USA) and were a generous gift from Dr. Thomas Coffman [18]. All mice were backcrossed 10 times into a C57BL/6 background. Male AT1b receptor −/− mice were mated to female LDL receptor −/− mice to generate heterogeneous progeny. The F2 progeny were screened for developing breeding pairs of AT1b receptor +/+ or −/−×LDL receptor −/− mice. AT1b receptor +/+ and −/− mice in the LDL receptor −/− background were used for the present study. Mice were maintained in a barrier facility and fed a standard laboratory diet unless specified otherwise.
Real-time PCR
RNA was isolated from aortic tissues of C57BL/6 mice by RNeasy fibrous tissue kit (Cat# 74704, Qiagen, Valenica, CA, USA). RNA was reversely transcribed using an iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Cat# 170–8891, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Real time PCR was performed using a CFX96 cycler (Bio-Rad). Taqman probes (ABI, Carlsbad, CA, USA) specific for AT1a and AT1b receptors, respectively, were used to measure mRNA abundance. mRNA abundance in the selected aortic regions was calculated with 18S rRNA normalization using the ΔΔCt method. Samples containing either no template or no RT reactions were used as negative controls.
Genotyping
DNA was isolated from tail tissues using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Cat# AS1120, Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Mouse genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). AT1b receptor genotyping was determined using the following primers: 5′-GCATCATCTTTGTGGTGGG and 5′-ATGAGCACATCCAGAAAA C. The PCR was performed with 1 step of 94°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min; and 1 step of 72°C for 5 min. Wild type and disrupted alleles generated amplicon sizes of 550 bp and 1,600 bp, respectively. AT1a receptor and LDL receptor genotypes were verified by PCR as described previously [19].
Aortic Contractility
Mice were anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) as described previously [20]. Aortas from C57BL/6, AT1a receptor −/−, and AT1b receptor −/− mice were perfused with saline via the left ventricle and then removed, and adventitia were cleaned off completely without damages of the media portion. Measurement of contractile activity was performed using infra-renal aortic rings as described previously [3]. Infra-renal segments were mounted by passing two tungsten wires through the arterial lumen and arterial segments were immersed in Krebs Henseleit solution. Tension (1 gram) was maintained continuously and recorded with a Micro-Med Tissue Analyzer (TFA-410, Louisville, KY, USA). After a 30 min equilibration, tissues were incubated with potassium chloride (KCl; 80 mM, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; 1 µM, Sigma), or AngII (1 µM, Sigma) for 30 min between the agonists.
Diet and AngII Infusions
To induce hypercholesterolemia, mice were fed a diet supplemented with saturated fat (milk fat 21% wt/wt) and cholesterol (0.2% wt/wt; Diet# TD.88137, Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI, USA) ad libitum starting 1 week prior to pump implantation, and continuing for the 28 days of saline or AngII infusion. After 1 week of feeding, AngII (1,000 ng/kg/min; Cat# H-1705, Bachem, Torrance, CA, USA) was infused subcutaneously into 8–10 week old male mice subcutaneously via Alzet osmotic minipumps (Model 2004, Durect Corporation, Cupertino, CA, USA) for 28 days as described previously [12], [21].
Systolic Blood Pressure Measurements
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured during the last week for 5 consecutive days of AngII infusion using a non-invasive tail cuff system (Coda 8, Kent Scientific Corporation, Torrington, CT, USA) on conscious mice as described previously [22].
Plasma Component Measurements
Blood was drawn by right ventricular puncture and collected in EDTA (1.8 mg/ml) coated vials at termination. Plasma cholesterol concentrations were quantified with a commercially available enzymatic kit (Cat# Cholesterol E 439–17501, Wako Chemical USA, Richmond, VA, USA) as described previously [23]. Plasma renin concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay using a commercially available kit (Cat# 1553, DiaSorin Inc., Stillwater, MN, USA) as described previously [20].
Atherosclerosis and Aortic Aneurysm Quantification
After exsanguination, saline was perfused through the left ventricle of the heart. Aortas were removed and kept in neutrally buffered formalin (10% w/v) overnight before adventitia were cleaned off completely. Thoracic aorta was cut open and pinned. Aortic arch region included the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and 3 mm distal from the aortic orifice of the left subclavian artery. The remaining length of the thoracic aorta till the last intercostal branches was defined as the descending thoracic aorta. Atherosclerosis was quantified on the intima of both the arch and descending thoracic regions as described previously [24]. Oil Red O staining of aortas was performed as described previously [24], [25].
Luminal diameters of abdominal aortas were measured in vivo with a high frequency ultrasound (Vevo 660, VisualSonics, Toronto, Canada) on day 0 (the day before osmotic minipump implantation) and day 28 during AngII infusion as described previously [26]. This system acquired images that were used to measure maximal lumen dilation. After termination, aortas were cleaned off adventitia and pinned, and maximal external supra-renal diameters were measured using Image-Pro Software 7.0 (Media Cybernetics Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA) as described previously [27].
After measurements of ex vivo diameter, supra-renal aortas were embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound and serially sectioned in a cryostat. Tissues were sectioned in a serial set of 8 slides that contained 9 sections (thickness: 10 µm/section) of each slide. To characterize AAAs, Movat’s pentachrome staining was performed as described in our previous studies [28].
Statistical Analyses
SigmaPlot 12.0 (SYSTAT Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Data were represented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test was performed as appropriate for two-group comparisons, and one way ANOVA was performed for multiple-group (more than 2 groups) comparisons. Two way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak post hoc analysis was performed for multiple-group and multiple-manipulation analysis. Two way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to compare aortic diameters measured on day 0 and day 28 using ultrasonography. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
mRNA Abundance of Both AT1 Receptor Subtypes was Increased in Infra-renal Aortas
We first measured mRNA abundance of both receptor subtypes throughout the aorta by real-time PCR. mRNA abundance of receptor subtypes was increased significantly in the infra-renal aorta compared to other selected regions of aortas (Figure 1A and 1B; P<0.001). Compared to the infra-renal region, mRNA abundance of both receptor subtypes was much lower in supra-renal aortas, and very low in both ascending and descending aortic regions (Figure 1A and 1B). In agreement with previous studies [2], [5], [8], we observed higher relative abundance of AT1a receptor mRNA in liver and kidney, while AT1b receptor mRNA was either not detected or negligible in these tissues (data not shown).
AT1b Receptor Deficiency Abolished AngII-induced Infra-renal Contractile Response
Given differences in regional mRNA abundance of both receptor subtypes along the length of aortic tissue, we sought to compare the role of these receptor subtypes in AngII-induced contraction. Previous studies have noted a distinction in AngII-induced contractility in thoracic and abdominal regions [3], but it has not been defined whether there were further distinctions between the receptor subtypes in abdominal aortas. After confirmation of deletion of AT1a receptor or AT1b receptor alleles by PCR, we performed contractile studies using aortic rings from aortas of C57BL/6, AT1a receptor −/−, and AT1b receptor −/− mice, respectively. As expected, KCl and 5-HT contracted infra-renal aortic rings in all genotypes (Figure 2). As reported previously, AngII only contracted rings isolated from the infra-renal region (Figure 2A) [3]. Furthermore, we confirmed that deletion of AT1a receptors had no effect on AngII-induced contractions (Figure 2B) [3]. In contrast, deficiency of AT1b receptors markedly reduced AngII-induced contraction in the infra-renal aorta (Figure 2C).
AT1b Receptor Deficiency Had No Effect on AngII-induced Increases of SBP
A previous study inferred a role of AT1b receptors in blood pressure regulation [17] and plasma renin concentrations [29]. Following the demonstration of a functional role of AT1b receptors in aortic tissues, we infused AngII for 28 days into AT1b receptor +/+ and −/− mice. Whole body deficiency of AT1b receptors during AngII infusion had no significant effect on body weight and did not change plasma renin concentrations (Table 1). Deletion of AT1b receptors had no significant effect on SBP in response to AngII (Table 1).
Table 1. Characterization of AT1b receptor +/+ and −/− mice infused with AngII.
AT1b receptor genotype | +/+ | −/− |
N = 16 | N = 10 | |
Body weight (g) | 24.9±0.5 | 23.7±0.4 |
SBP (mmHg) | 158±8 | 155±8 |
Plasma renin concentration(ng/ml/30 min) | 1.87±0.6 | 1.56±0.6 |
Plasma cholesterol concentration(mg/dl) | 1,690±75 | 1,776±64 |
Body weight, plasma cholesterol and renin concentrations were measured after termination. SBP was measured during the last week of the study. Values are represented as mean ± SEM. There were no significant differences between the two AT1b receptor genotypes.
AT1b Receptor Deficiency Had No Effect on AngII-induced Aortic Atherosclerosis
In male LDL receptor −/− mice that were either AT1b receptor +/+ or −/− were infused with AngII for 28 days. There was no significant difference in plasma cholesterol concentrations between the groups (Table 1). Atherosclerotic lesion size was quantified on the intimal surfaces of the aortic arch and descending thoracic regions of all mice. Abdominal aortic region was excluded because the presence of AAAs impedes accurate measurement of atherosclerosis. There was no significant difference in percent atherosclerotic lesion area in the aortic arch (Figure 3A) and descending thoracic regions (Figure 3B) of AT1b receptor +/+ and −/− mice infused with AngII. Examples of en face aortas with versus without Oil Red O staining are shown in Figure S1A and S1B, respectively.
AT1b Receptor Deficiency Had No Effect on AngII-induced AAAs
Following the demonstration of a predominance of AT1b receptor mRNA in abdominal aortas, we sought to examine the role of AT1b receptors in AngII-induced AAA formation. Maximal luminal diameters of supra-renal aortas were determined in vivo using a high frequency ultrasound at baseline (day 0) and on day 28 during AngII infusion in LDL receptor −/− mice that were either AT1b receptor +/+ or −/−. Maximal luminal diameters significantly increased in both study groups on day 28 during AngII infusion compared to day 0 (Figure 4A; P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in luminal diameters of supra-renal aortas between AT1b receptor +/+ and −/− mice after 28-day infusion of AngII (Figure 4A).
The presence of AAAs were confirmed by measuring maximal external width of the supra-renal region using an ex vivo method. There was no significant difference of maximal external width of supra-renal aortas between AT1b receptor +/+ and −/− mice (Figure 4B). Examples of ultrasound photographs and ex vivo images of abdominal aortas are shown in Figure 4C.
We also examined histological features of the supra-renal aorta with Movat’s pentachrome staining. There were no discernible differences of elastin fibers in supra-renal aortas prior to AngII infusion (Figure S2A). After AngII infusion, occurrence of focal elastin disruption in this aortic region was comparable between AT1b receptor +/+ and −/− mice (Figure S2B).
AT1b Receptor Deficiency Had No Effect on AngII-induced Ascending Aortic Dilation
We have recently reported that chronic AngII infusion also induces thoracic aortic aneurysms [3], [14]. In mice infused with AngII for 28 days, there was no significant difference in intimal areas of aortic arches (Figure 5A) and descending thoracic aortas (Figure 5B) between AT1b receptor +/+ and −/− mice.
Discussion
The present study examined the role of AT1b receptors in aortic tissues in response to AngII. We initially demonstrated the concordance of the regional abundance of AT1b receptor mRNA and the presence of functional AT1b receptors in the aorta as the primary mediator of AngII-induced region-specific contractile response. Despite the presence of functional AT1b receptors in the aortic tissue, whole body deficiency of AT1b receptors had no effect on AngII-induced aortic atherosclerosis and aortic aneurysm formation in hypercholesterolemic mice.
While both AT1 receptor subtypes are present in aortic tissues, the abundance of receptor subtype mRNA has only been characterized in selected aortic regions [30], [31]. In the present study, we demonstrated that both receptor subtypes exhibit regional differences in mRNA abundances in the aorta. We confirmed that mRNA of AT1b receptors was significantly more abundant in the abdominal region compared to the thoracic region [2], [31], and extended previous findings by demonstrating that the AT1b receptor subtype in the infra-renal region had much greater abundance than in the supra-renal area. AT1a receptor mRNA was detected in liver and kidney; however, AT1b receptor mRNA was absent or negligible in these tissues. Our results are in agreement with previous studies that AT1a receptors are more ubiquitously expressed and AT1b receptors are restricted to some tissues [2], [5], [8].
AngII is known to promote many physiological and pathological responses in a region-specific manner in the aorta [2], [31]–[33]. This may be due to heterogeneous developmental origins of SMCs [34]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that contractile responses to AngII differ in selected regions of the aorta [2], [3], [8], [30], [35]. In the present study, we sought to examine the contractile responses to AngII in infra-renal aortic tissues in the presence or absence of AT1a and AT1b receptors. We have noted previously that there are minimal contractile responses to AngII in ascending and descending thoracic aortas [3]. AngII promoted contraction of the infra-renal aorta in C57BL/6 mice. Despite higher abundance of AT1a receptors in the infra-renal portion of the abdominal aorta, deletion of AT1a receptors had no effect on contractile responses to AngII. In contrast, the contractile response to AngII was diminished in infra-renal aortas from AT1b receptor −/− mice. This effect coincided with the greatest abundance of AT1b receptor mRNA. Our results are in agreement with a previous study that indirectly demonstrated AngII-induced contractile responses being linked to AT1b receptors through the use of an AT1 receptor antagonist (losartan) in AT1a receptor −/− mice [2]. In another study, AngII-induced contractile responses were defined in AT1b receptor +/+ and −/− mice and demonstrated that AT1b receptors mediated contraction of abdominal aortas [11]. The present study demonstrated that the regional specificity of AngII-induced aortic contractions coincided with the greatest abundance of AT1b receptor mRNA. However, there are still quandaries relating to these data. AT1a receptor mRNA was also most abundant in this region, but this receptor subtype did not affect AngII-induced contractions in this region. Additionally, expression of both receptors was detected in the supra-renal aorta, but this region does not contract in response to AngII stimulation [3].
Blood pressure is considered an important risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. A previous study that examined residual pressor effects of AngII in AT1a receptor −/− mice suggested that AT1b receptors might contribute to pressor effects in the absence of AT1a receptors [17]. However, it has been demonstrated previously that whole body deficiency of AT1a receptors ablates AngII-induced increases of systolic blood pressure [15], [29]. The location of AT1a receptors that mediates the increased blood pressure during AngII infusion has not been defined. Recent reports provided surprising results that depletion of AT1a receptors using SM22-promoter driven Cre did not affect AngII-induced increases in systolic blood pressure [3]. Despite not being clearly defined, this apparent paradox may be related to the lack of expression of SM22-driven Cre in the kidney that is a major tissue controlling AngII-induced hypertension [36], [37]. In the present study, deletion of AT1b receptors had no effect on blood pressure induced by infusion with AngII. Others have also demonstrated that AT1b receptor deletion had no effect on AngII-induced increases in SBP [18]. Overall, despite the requirement of AT1b receptors for contractile responses to AngII in the infra-renal aorta, we were unable to demonstrate an effect of AT1b receptors on blood pressure regulation. As with AT1a receptors, the contrasting effect of AT1b receptor deficiency on AngII-induced aortic contraction versus systolic blood pressure presumably reflects the vascular bed specific effects of AngII.
Hypercholesterolemic mice infused with AngII for 4 weeks develop aortic atherosclerosis predominantly in the ascending aortic region [14], [15], [38], [39], while the development of lesions in the abdominal aortic region is modest unless AngII infusion is prolonged [13]. Aortas display a gradient of mRNA abundance for both AT1a and AT1b receptors that was lowest in the ascending region and highest in the infra-renal region. Although the ascending aortic region has the lowest abundance for both AT1a and AT1b receptor mRNA, this is the major site for initiation and propagation of atherosclerosis [40], [41]. Our results showed that absence of AT1b receptors had no effect on the size of AngII-induced atherosclerotic lesions in either the aortic arch or the descending thoracic region in LDL receptor −/− mice, indicating that AT1b receptors do not influence the development of atherosclerosis. However, despite the low abundance of AT1a receptor mRNA in the ascending aorta, deficiency of this receptor ablated AngII-induced atherosclerosis in this region [15]. Therefore, development of atherosclerosis was not associated with the regional abundance of mRNA of either AngII type 1 receptor subtype.
To directly determine the role of AngII stimulation of AT1b receptors in pathological processes of aortic aneurysm formation, we infused AngII into AT1b receptor +/+ and −/− mice for 28 days. Despite the presence of AT1b receptor mRNA in this region, deletion of this gene had no effect on AngII-induced AAA formation. In agreement with previous findings, these results demonstrate that AT1a receptors are responsible for AngII-induced AAA formation [15]. AngII infusion promotes pronounced ascending aortic dilation [14] and mRNA of both AT1 receptor subtypes are expressed in this region. However, deletion of AT1b receptors had no effect on, while whole body deficiency of AT1a receptors ablated, ascending aortic aneurysms [3]. Therefore, the relative regional mRNA abundance of both AT1 receptor subtypes has no obvious relationship to the location of AngII-induced aortic pathologies.
In summary, there are several major findings in the present study including AT1b receptors contributing to AngII-induced aortic contraction that parallels with the mRNA abundance of AT1b receptors in this region, and AT1b receptors not contributing to AngII-induced atherosclerosis and aortic aneurysms in either the ascending or abdominal aortic region. Interestingly, AT1a and AT1b receptors are abundant in the infra-renal region but exhibit different vascular contractility with AngII stimulation. These pathophysiological differences may be due to amino acid differences in the C-terminal region between the two receptor subtypes, resulting in elicitation of distinct signaling pathways. Future studies will determine whether relative variations in the protein sequences of these two receptor subtypes lead to differential responses to AngII in order to understand the different modes of action induced by the two receptor subtypes in AngII-induced vascular diseases.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Thomas Coffman at Duke University for providing AT1b receptor −/− mice. We thank the editorial assistance of Dr. Hong Lu and Ms. Debra L. Rateri. We also thank Ms. Victoria English for plasma renin measurements.
Funding Statement
This research work was supported by grants from National Institute of Health (HL80100 and HL107319). Aruna Poduri was supported by an American Heart Association Great Rivers Affiliate Postdoctoral fellowship (10POST3140016) and A. Phillip Owens III was supported by an American Heart Association Ohio Valley Affiliate Predoctoral fellowship (0615222B) for the data presented in this manuscript. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Mehta PK, Griendling KK (2007) Angiotensin II cell signaling: physiological and pathological effects in the cardiovascular system. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 292: C82–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zhou Y, Chen Y, Dirksen WP, Morris M, Periasamy M (2003) AT1b receptor predominantly mediates contractions in major mouse blood vessels. Circ Res 93: 1089–1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rateri DL, Moorleghen JJ, Balakrishnan A, Owens AP 3rd, Howatt DA, et al (2011) Endothelial cell-specific deficiency of Ang II type 1a receptors attenuates Ang II-induced ascending aortic aneurysms in LDL receptor−/− mice. Circ Res 108: 574–581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Yoshida H, Kakuchi J, Guo DF, Furuta H, Iwai N, et al. (1992) Analysis of the evolution of angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene in mammals (mouse, rat, bovine and human). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 186: 1042–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Burson JM, Aguilera G, Gross KW, Sigmund CD (1994) Differential expression of angiotensin receptor 1A and 1B in mouse. Am. J. Physiol. 267: E260–E267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kakar SS, Sellers JC, Devor DC, Musgrove LC, Neill JD (1992) Angiotensin II type-1 receptor subtype cDNAs: differential tissue expression and hormonal regulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 183: 1090–1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Iwai N, Inagami T (1992) Identification of two subtypes in the rat type I angiotensin II receptor. FEBS Lett. 298: 257–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zhou Y, Dirksen WP, Chen Y, Morris M, Zweier JL, et al. (2005) A major role for AT1b receptor in mouse mesenteric resistance vessels and its distribution in heart and neuroendocrine tissues. J Mol Cell Cardiol 38: 693–696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sasamura H, Hein L, Krieger JE, Pratt RE, Kobilka BK, et al. (1992) Cloning, characterization, and expression of two angiotensin receptor (AT-1) isoforms from the mouse genome. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 185: 253–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Inagami T, Iwai N, Sasaki K, Yamano Y, Bardhan S, et al.. (1994) Cloning, expression and regulation of angiotensin II receptors. Eur Heart J 15 Suppl D: 104–107. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11. Swafford AN Jr, Harrison-Bernard LM, Dick GM (2007) Knockout mice reveal that the angiotensin II type 1B receptor links to smooth muscle contraction. Am J Hypertens 20: 335–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Daugherty A, Manning MW, Cassis LA (2000) Angiotensin II promotes atherosclerotic lesions and aneurysms in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J Clin Invest 105: 1605–1612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Weiss D, Kools JJ, Taylor WR (2001) Angiotensin II-induced hypertension accelerates the development of atherosclerosis in apoE-deficient mice. Circulation 103: 448–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Daugherty A, Rateri DL, Charo IF, Owens AP, Howatt DA, et al. (2010) Angiotensin II infusion promotes ascending aortic aneurysms: attenuation by CCR2 deficiency in apoE−/− mice. Clin Sci (Lond) 118: 681–689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Cassis LA, Rateri DL, Lu H, Daugherty A (2007) Bone marrow transplantation reveals that recipient AT1a receptors are required to initiate angiotensin II-induced atherosclerosis and aneurysms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27: 380–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhu Z, Zhang SH, Wagner C, Kurtz A, Maeda N, et al. (1998) Angiotensin AT1B receptor mediates calcium signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells of AT1A receptor-deficient mice. Hypertension 31: 1171–1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Oliverio MI, Best CF, Kim HS, Arendshorst WJ, Smithies O, et al. (1997) Angiotensin II responses in AT1A receptor-deficient mice: a role for AT1B receptors in blood pressure regulation. Am. J. Physiol. 272: F515–520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Oliverio MI, Kim HS, Ito M, Le T, Audoly L, et al. (1998) Reduced growth, abnormal kidney structure, and type 2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor-mediated blood pressure regulation in mice lacking both AT1A and AT1B receptors for angiotensin II. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 15496–15151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Daugherty A, Rateri DL, Lu H, Inagami T, Cassis LA (2004) Hypercholesterolemia stimulates angiotensin peptide synthesis and contributes to atherosclerosis through the AT1A receptor. Circulation 110: 3849–3857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lu H, Balakrishnan A, Howatt DA, Wu C, Charnigo R, et al. (2012) Comparative effects of different modes of renin angiotensin system inhibition on hypercholesterolaemia-induced atherosclerosis. Br J Pharmacol 165: 2000–2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Daugherty A, Cassis L (1999) Chronic angiotensin II infusion promotes atherogenesis in low density lipoprotein receptor −/− mice. Ann NY Acad Sci 892: 108–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Daugherty A, Rateri D, Lu H, Balakrishnan A (2009) Measuring blood pressure in mice using volume pressure recording, a tail-cuff method. J Vis Exp 1291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23. Daugherty A, Rateri DL (1994) Presence of LDL receptor-related protein/alpha 2-macroglobulin receptors in macrophages of atherosclerotic lesions from cholesterol- fed New Zealand and heterozygous Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits. Arterioscler Thromb 14: 2017–2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Daugherty A, Whitman SC (2003) Quantification of atherosclerosis in mice. Methods Mol Biol 209: 293–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Daugherty A, Rateri DL (2005) Development of experimental designs for atherosclerosis studies in mice. Methods 36: 129–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Barisione C, Charnigo R, Howatt DA, Moorleghen JJ, Rateri DL, et al. (2006) Rapid dilation of the abdominal aorta during infusion of angiotensin II detected by noninvasive high-frequency ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 44: 372–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang YX, Cassis LA, Daugherty A (2006) Angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysms. A Handbook of Mouse Models for Cardiovascular Disease Ed. Q. Xu, John Wiley & Sons: 125–136.
- 28. Rateri DL, Howatt DA, Moorleghen JJ, Charnigo R, Cassis LA, et al. (2011) Prolonged infusion of angiotensin II in apoE−/− mice promotes macrophage recruitment with continued expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Am J Pathol 179: 1542–1548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Owens AP 3rd, Subramanian V, Moorleghen JJ, Guo Z, McNamara CA, et al (2010) Angiotensin II induces a region-specific hyperplasia of the ascending aorta through regulation of inhibitor of differentiation 3. Circ Res 106: 611–619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zhang X, Thatcher SE, Rateri DL, Bruemmer D, Charnigo R, et al. (2012) Transient Exposure of Neonatal Female Mice to Testosterone Abrogates the Sexual Dimorphism of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Circ Res 110: e73–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Henriques T, Zhang X, Yiannikouris FB, Daugherty A, Cassis LA (2008) Androgen increases AT1a receptor expression in abdominal aortas to promote angiotensin II-induced AAAs in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 28: 1251–1256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Subramanian V, Golledge J, Ijaz T, Bruemmer D, Daugherty A (2010) Pioglitazone-induced reductions in atherosclerosis occur via smooth muscle cell-specific interaction with PPAR{gamma}. Circ Res 107: 953–958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wang Y, Ait-Oufella H, Herbin O, Bonnin P, Ramkhelawon B, et al. (2010) TGF-beta activity protects against inflammatory aortic aneurysm progression and complications in angiotensin II-infused mice. J Clin Invest 120: 422–432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Majesky MW (2007) Developmental basis of vascular smooth muscle diversity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 27: 1248–1258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Zhou Y, Dirksen WP, Chen Y, Morris M, Zweier JL, et al. (2005) A major role for AT1b receptor in mouse mesenteric resistance vessels and its distribution in heart and neuroendocrine tissues. J Mol Cell Cardiol 38: 693–696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Crowley SD, Gurley SB, Oliverio MI, Pazmino AK, Griffiths R, et al. (2005) Distinct roles for the kidney and systemic tissues in blood pressure regulation by the renin-angiotensin system. J Clin Invest 115: 1092–1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Li H, Weatherford ET, Davis DR, Keen HL, Grobe JL, et al. (2011) Renal proximal tubule angiotensin AT1A receptors regulate blood pressure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 301 4: R1067–1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Uchida HA, Kristo F, Rateri DL, Lu H, Charnigo R, et al. (2010) Total lymphocyte deficiency attenuates AngII-induced atherosclerosis in males but not abdominal aortic aneurysms in apoE deficient mice. Atherosclerosis 211: 399–403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Owens AP 3rd, Rateri DL, Howatt DA, Moore KJ, Tobias PS, et al (2011) MyD88 deficiency attenuates angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm formation independent of signaling through toll-like receptors 2 and 4. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 31: 2813–2819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Reddick RL, Zhang SH, Maeda N (1994) Atherosclerosis in mice lacking apo E - Evaluation of lesional development and progression. Arterioscler Thromb Vacsc Biol 14: 141–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Tangirala RK, Rubin EM, Palinski W (1995) Quantitation of atherosclerosis in murine models: Correlation between lesions in the aortic origin and in the entire aorta, and differences in the extent of lesions between sexes in LDL receptor-deficient and apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J Lipid Res 36: 2320–2328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.