Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1980 Apr;77(4):1778–1782. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.4.1778

Association of Mu-containing plasmids with the Escherichia coli chromosome upon prophage induction

George Chaconas 1, Rasika M Harshey 1, Ahmad I Bukhari 1
PMCID: PMC348590  PMID: 6246503

Abstract

To determine the structure of a prophage-containing plasmid during Mu transposition, we have monitored the physical state of pSC101[unk]Mucts after thermoinduction. We have also examined the fate of a mini Mu plasmid constructed in vitro by deleting 27 kilobases from the center of the Mu prophage in pSC101[unk]Mucts. At various times after prophage induction, DNA was extracted from Mu or mini Mu plasmid-containing strains and subjected to electrophoresis in low concentration agarose gels followed by transfer of the DNA to nitrocellulose paper. Separate hybridization with 32P-labeled pSC101 and Mu DNA revealed the position of the plasmids and the replication of Mu DNA. At times after induction when Mu replication was clearly visible, Mu and mini Mu plasmids were found to migrate with Escherchia coli DNA. This Mu-specific association requires the phage coded A and B proteins. Electron microscopy has shown that some of the associated DNA is comprised of circular plasmid molecules which appear to be in contact with the chromosomal DNA. These structures may represent intermediates or end products of the replication-integration process. The finding that Mu and mini Mu plasmids do not give rise to any detectable excision products and apparently remain intact during Mu transposition supports our proposal that the predominant event after Mu induction is the replication of Mu DNA in situ to generate integrative intermediates.

Keywords: bacteriophage Mu, transposable genetic elements, replication-integration, Southern blotting, electron microscopy

Full text

PDF
1778

Images in this article

1779Image
on p.1779
1779Image
on p.1779
1780Image
on p.1780
1780Image
on p.1780
1780Image
on p.1780
1780Image
on p.1780
1780Image
on p.1780
1780Image
on p.1780
1780Image
on p.1780
1781Image
on p.1781
1781Image
on p.1781
1781Image
on p.1781

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allet B. Mu insertion duplicates a 5 base pair sequence at the host inserted site. Cell. 1979 Jan;16(1):123–129. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90193-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bukhari A. I. Bacteriophage mu as a transposition element. Annu Rev Genet. 1976;10:389–412. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176.002133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bukhari A. I., Curtin P. Temperature-sensitive mutants of bacteriophage mu. J Virol. 1974 Dec;14(6):1615–1616. doi: 10.1128/jvi.14.6.1615-1616.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bukhari A. I., Froshauer S., Botchan M. Ends of bacteriophage mu DNA. Nature. 1976 Dec 9;264(5586):580–583. doi: 10.1038/264580a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bukhari A. I. Reversal of mutator phage Mu integration. J Mol Biol. 1975 Jul 25;96(1):87–99. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90183-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bukhari A. I. Transposition of DNA sequences. Brookhaven Symp Biol. 1977 May 12;(29):218–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Campbell A. M. How viruses insert their DNA into the DNA of the host cell. Sci Am. 1976 Dec;235(6):102-9, 111-3. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1276-102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dawid I. B. DNA-DNA hybridization on membrane filters: a convenient method using formamide. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Jul 15;477(2):191–194. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(77)90235-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Faelen M., Resibois A., Toussaint A. Mini-mu: an insertion element derived from temperate phage mu-1. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 2):1169–1177. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghosal D., Sommer H., Saedler H. Nucleotide sequence of the transposable DNA-element IS2. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Mar;6(3):1111–1122. doi: 10.1093/nar/6.3.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gill R., Heffron F., Dougan G., Falkow S. Analysis of sequences transposed by complementation of two classes of transposition-deficient mutants of Tn3. J Bacteriol. 1978 Nov;136(2):742–756. doi: 10.1128/jb.136.2.742-756.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Heffron F., Bedinger P., Champoux J. J., Falkow S. Deletions affecting the transposition of an antibiotic resistance gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Feb;74(2):702–706. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.2.702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Howe M. M. Prophage deletion mapping of bacteriophage Mu-1. Virology. 1973 Jul;54(1):93–101. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(73)90118-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kahmann R., Kamp D. Nucleotide sequences of the attachment sites of bacteriophage Mu DNA. Nature. 1979 Jul 19;280(5719):247–250. doi: 10.1038/280247a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ljungquist E., Bukhari A. I. State of prophage Mu DNA upon induction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Aug;74(8):3143–3147. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Meyer R., Boch G., Shapiro J. Transposition of DNA inserted into deletions of the Tn5 kanamycin resistance element. Mol Gen Genet. 1979 Mar 9;171(1):7–13. doi: 10.1007/BF00274009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ohtsubo H., Ohmori H., Ohtsubo E. Nucleotide-sequence analysis of Tn3 (ap): implications for insertion and deletion. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 2):1269–1277. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ravetch J. V., Ohsumi M., Model P., Vovis G. F., Fischhoff D., Zinder N. D. Organization of a hybrid between phage f1 and plasmid pSC101. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 May;76(5):2195–2198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.5.2195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reed R. R., Young R. A., Steitz J. A., Grindley N. D., Guyer M. S. Transposition of the Escherichia coli insertion element gamma generates a five-base-pair repeat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):4882–4886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.4882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shapiro J. A. Molecular model for the transposition and replication of bacteriophage Mu and other transposable elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Apr;76(4):1933–1937. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.4.1933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Southern E. M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Toussaint A., Faelen M. Connecting two unrelated DNA sequences with a Mu dimer. Nat New Biol. 1973 Mar 7;242(114):1–4. doi: 10.1038/newbio242001a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wijffelman C., Gassler M., Stevens W. F., van de Putte P. On the control of transcription of bacteriophage Mu. Mol Gen Genet. 1974;131(2):85–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00266145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wijffelman C., Lotterman B. Kinetics of Mu DNA synthesis. Mol Gen Genet. 1977 Mar 7;151(2):169–174. doi: 10.1007/BF00338691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES