Abstract
To aid in the investigation of the Populus deltoides microbiome, we generated draft genome sequences for 21 Pseudomonas strains and 19 other diverse bacteria isolated from Populus deltoides roots. Genome sequences for isolates similar to Acidovorax, Bradyrhizobium, Brevibacillus, Caulobacter, Chryseobacterium, Flavobacterium, Herbaspirillum, Novosphingobium, Pantoea, Phyllobacterium, Polaromonas, Rhizobium, Sphingobium, and Variovorax were generated.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Plant-microbe interactions within the rhizosphere have been shown to have important roles in plant health and productivity (1, 4, 8, 20). As part of an ongoing effort to better understand the microbial communities associated with native Populus deltoides (Eastern cottonwood), we have under taken both cultivation-independent and cultivation-dependent assessments of microbial communities from the P. deltoides rhizosphere and endosphere (3, 5, 25). Our goal is to understand the diversity of the Populus microbiome and to elucidate the metabolic and molecular mechanisms responsible for shaping Populus-microbe root interactions.
We sampled P. deltoides at sites along the Caney Fork River in central Tennessee and at the Yadkin River in North Carolina. These sites represent ecotypes and soil conditions that are common to this region. Approximately 1,100 diverse bacterial strains were collected to investigate phylogenetic and functional diversity. The isolates comprise 7 classes and 85 genera of bacteria, including Actinobacterium (14%), Bacillus (17%), Flavobacterium (6%), Sphingobacterium (3%), Alphaproteobacteria (22%), Betaproteobacteria (16%), and Gammaproteobacteria (22%). A number of our isolates were Pseudomonas species, which have considerable genetic and phenotypic variability and include pathogenic, biocontrol, and plant growth-promoting bacteria (14, 21). Pseudomonads were also found to be one of the most common operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using direct rRNA gene sequencing of P. deltoides endosphere and rhizosphere samples (5). While representatives were chosen for genome sequencing based on overall phenotypic traits and phylogeny, a special emphasis was placed on sequencing P. fluorescens-like organisms. In all, 23 strains of Gammaproteobacteria, 5 of Betaproteobacteria, 8 of Alphaproteobacteria, 2 of Bacteroidetes, and 2 of Firmicutes were sequenced.
Paired-end DNA libraries with an average insert size of 500 bp were created and draft genome data were generated using Illumina (2) HiSeq2000 technology. CLC Genomics Workbench (version 4.7.1) and FASTQC (13) were applied to trim reads for quality sequence data. Trimmed Illumina data were assembled mostly using the CLC Genomics Workbench (version 4.9), although better assemblies for isolates AP49, BC25, CF314, GM16, and GM49 were generated with Velvet (version 1.2) (26). Draft genome sequences were annotated using the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Joint Genome Institute (JGI) integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system (IMG) (15), and contigs of 500 bp or greater were deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information GenBank database. The median value for the largest contig in each genome was 249,964 bp, and key attributes for the genome sequences are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Organism | Origina | Coverage (fold) | No. of contigs | % GC | N50 | No. of CDS | Genome size (bp) | Accession no. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acidovorax sp. strain CF316 | E | 310 | 315 | 67 | 37,104 | 7,206 | 7,086,227 | AKJX00000000 |
Bradyrhizobium sp. strain YR681 | E | 250 | 351 | 64 | 37,719 | 8,302 | 7,831,714 | AKIY00000000 |
Brevibacillus sp. strain CF112 | E | 560 | 172 | 54 | 76,367 | 5,272 | 5,271,824 | AKKB00000000 |
Brevibacillus sp. strain BC25 | E | 650 | 140 | 47 | 68,877 | 6,021 | 6,279,079 | AKIX00000000 |
Caulobacter sp. strain AP07 | R | 390 | 326 | 69 | 30,563 | 5,373 | 5,615,958 | AKKF00000000 |
Chryseobacterium sp. strain CF314 | E | 1,200 | 119 | 37 | 80,113 | 4,125 | 4,484,672 | AKJY00000000 |
Flavobacterium sp. strain CF136 | E | 2,721 | 113 | 34 | 89,762 | 4,366 | 5,102,016 | AKJZ00000000 |
Herbaspirillum sp. strain CF444 | E | 520 | 125 | 60 | 82,125 | 5,004 | 5,594,732 | AKJW00000000 |
Herbaspirillum sp. strain YR522 | E | 530 | 168 | 63 | 54,530 | 4,949 | 5,113,042 | AKJA00000000 |
Novosphingobium sp. strain AP12 | R | 430 | 187 | 66 | 54,713 | 5,532 | 5,611,617 | AKKE00000000 |
Pantoea sp. strain GM01 | R | 680 | 102 | 54 | 91,591 | 4,998 | 5,320,548 | AKIU00000000 |
Pantoea sp. strain YR343 | R | 700 | 128 | 55 | 94,033 | 4,900 | 5,314,049 | AKIT00000000 |
Phyllobacterium sp. strain YR531 | E | 990 | 41 | 53 | 257,533 | 4,901 | 4,997,302 | AKIZ00000000 |
Polaromonas sp. strain CF318 | E | 620 | 159 | 65 | 61,518 | 4,828 | 5,008,816 | AKIV00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM16 | E | 2,300 | 128 | 59 | 122,673 | 5,888 | 6,550,518 | AKJV00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM84 | R | 256 | 384 | 63 | 24,795 | 5,295 | 5,818,772 | AKJC00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM24 | E | 3,200 | 399 | 59 | 32,656 | 5,885 | 6,517,063 | AKJR00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM102 | E | 440 | 159 | 59 | 88,165 | 6,039 | 6,657,346 | AKJB00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM33 | E | 440 | 205 | 60 | 61,913 | 6,102 | 6,727,223 | AKJO00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM78 | E | 469 | 235 | 60 | 57,174 | 6,724 | 7,287,561 | AKJF00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM80 | E | 474 | 282 | 59 | 39,805 | 6,245 | 6,786,162 | AKJD00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM17 | E | 480 | 280 | 63 | 44,590 | 6,105 | 6,786,964 | AKJU00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM79 | E | 486 | 126 | 59 | 96,213 | 6,062 | 6,707,010 | AKJE00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM67 | E | 509 | 183 | 60 | 68,050 | 6,003 | 6,502,113 | AKJH00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM74 | R | 512 | 180 | 60 | 75,201 | 5,562 | 6,104,277 | AKJG00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM30 | E | 520 | 180 | 60 | 59,627 | 5,611 | 6,140,967 | AKJP00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM41 | E | 520 | 164 | 59 | 75,073 | 6,066 | 6,615,479 | AKJN00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM50 | E | 520 | 155 | 59 | 68,220 | 6,068 | 6,692,143 | AKJK00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM25 | R | 530 | 91 | 61 | 137,130 | 5,758 | 6,350,607 | AKJQ00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM49 | R | 530 | 345 | 60 | 31,212 | 6,253 | 6,589,890 | AKJL00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM60 | E | 540 | 181 | 60 | 62,804 | 5,911 | 6,424,244 | AKJI00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM21 | E | 570 | 210 | 58 | 57,752 | 6,072 | 6,609,272 | AKJS00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM55 | E | 574 | 163 | 60 | 77,637 | 5,985 | 6,489,331 | AKJJ00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM18 | E | 580 | 140 | 60 | 106,048 | 5,711 | 6,297,618 | AKJT00000000 |
Pseudomonas sp. strain GM48 | R | 580 | 200 | 59 | 59,542 | 5,902 | 6,443,787 | AKJM00000000 |
Rhizobium sp. strain CF142 | E | 445 | 150 | 60 | 85,172 | 7,240 | 7,457,089 | AJWE00000000 |
Rhizobium sp. strain CF122 | E | 543 | 130 | 60 | 117,778 | 6,090 | 6,142,299 | AKKA00000000 |
Rhizobium sp. strain AP16 | E | 555 | 96 | 60 | 123,519 | 6,143 | 6,497,619 | AJVM00000000 |
Sphingobium sp. strain AP49 | E | 665 | 99 | 63 | 89,526 | 4,585 | 4,479,274 | AJVL00000000 |
Variovorax sp. strain CF313 | E | 2,200 | 173 | 67 | 65,214 | 5,674 | 6,029,174 | AKIW00000000 |
Median | 530 | 166 | 60 | 68,549 | 5,895 | 6,387,426 |
E, endosphere; R, rhizosphere.
Recently, a number of genome sequences for plant growth-promoting and biocontrol bacteria have been reported (6, 7, 9–12, 16–19, 22–24, and 27). The genome sequences reported in this study will facilitate comprehensive comparisons of bacteria involved in plant-microbe interactions.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The nucleotide sequences have been deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers provided in Table 1, and the versions described in this paper are the first versions. The entire DNA sequence data set has been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (accession number SRA050017).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was sponsored by the Genomic Science Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research, as part of the Plant Microbe Interfaces Scientific Focus Area (http://pmi.ornl.gov). Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by UT-Battelle LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725.
REFERENCES
- 1. Bais HP, Weir TL, Perry LG, Gilroy S, Vivanco JM. 2006. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57:233–266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bennett S. 2004. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics 5:433–438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Brown SD, et al. 2012. Draft genome sequence of Rhizobium sp. strain PDO1-076, a bacterium isolated from Populus deltoides. J. Bacteriol. 194:2383–2384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Compant S, Clement C, Sessitsch A. 2010. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42:669–678 [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gottel NR, et al. 2011. Distinct microbial communities within the endosphere and rhizosphere of Populus deltoides roots across contrasting soil types. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:5934–5944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hao K, et al. 2012. The genome of plant growth-promoting Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum strain YAU B9601-Y2 contains a gene cluster for mersacidin synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 194:3264–3265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hao X, et al. 2012. Draft genome sequence of plant growth-promoting rhizobium Mesorhizobium amorphae, isolated from zinc-lead mine tailings. J. Bacteriol. 194:736–737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hodge A, Berta G, Doussan C, Merchan F, Crespi M. 2009. Plant root growth, architecture and function. Plant Soil 321:153–187 [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hu D, et al. 2012. Genome sequence of Streptomyces sp. strain TOR3209, a rhizosphere microecology regulator isolated from tomato rhizosphere. J. Bacteriol. 194:1627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Jeong H, et al. 2011. Draft genome sequence of the Paenibacillus polymyxa type strain (ATCC 842T), a plant growth-promoting bacterium. J. Bacteriol. 193:5026–5027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kim HJ, et al. 2012. Draft genome sequence of Pantoea ananatis B1-9, a nonpathogenic plant growth-promoting bacterium. J. Bacteriol. 194:729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kim HJ, et al. 2011. Draft genome sequence of the biocontrol bacterium Chromobacterium sp. strain C-61. J. Bacteriol. 193:6803–6804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kircher M, Heyn P, Kelso J. 2011. Addressing challenges in the production and analysis of Illumina sequencing data. BMC Genomics 12:382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lugtenberg BJJ, Dekkers L, Bloemberg GV. 2001. Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 39:461–490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Markowitz VM, et al. 2012. IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:D115–D122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Mathimaran N, Srivastava R, Wiemken A, Sharma AK, Boller T. 2012. Genome sequences of two plant growth-promoting fluorescent Pseudomonas strains, R62 and R81. J. Bacteriol. 194:3272–3273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Niu B, Rueckert C, Blom J, Wang Q, Borriss R. 2011. The genome of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa M-1 contains nine sites dedicated to nonribosomal synthesis of lipopeptides and polyketides. J. Bacteriol. 193:5862–5863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Park JY, et al. 2011. Draft genome sequence of the biocontrol bacterium Pseudomonas putida B001, an oligotrophic bacterium that induces systemic resistance to plant diseases. J. Bacteriol. 193:6795–6796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Redondo-Nieto M, et al. 2012. Genome sequence of the biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens F113. J. Bacteriol. 194:1273–1274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T. 2011. Living inside plants: bacterial endophytes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14:435–443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Rojo F. 2010. Carbon catabolite repression in Pseudomonas: optimizing metabolic versatility and interactions with the environment. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 34:658–684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Rong X, Baysal Gurel F, Meulia T, McSpadden Gardener BB. 2012. Draft genome sequences of the Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strains Wayne1R and Wood1R. J. Bacteriol. 194:724–725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Rong X, Gurel F-B, Meulia T, McSpadden Gardener BB. 2012. Draft genome sequences of the biocontrol bacterium Mitsuaria sp. strain H24L5A. J. Bacteriol. 194:734–735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Song JY, et al. 2012. Genome sequence of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus sp. strain JS. J. Bacteriol. 194:3760–3761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Weston DJ, et al. 2012. Pseudomonas fluorescens induces strain-dependent and strain-independent host plant responses in defense networks, primary metabolism, photosynthesis, and fitness. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 25:765–778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18:821–829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zhu B, et al. 2012. Genome sequence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia RR-10, isolated as an endophyte from rice root. J. Bacteriol. 194:1280–1281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]