Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2012 Nov;194(22):6292–6293. doi: 10.1128/JB.01188-12

Genome Sequence of Staphylococcus aureus Newbould 305, a Strain Associated with Mild Bovine Mastitis

Damien Bouchard a,b, Vincent Peton a,b, Sintia Almeida a,b,c, Caroline Le Maréchal a,b,*, Anderson Miyoshi c, Vasco Azevedo c, Nadia Berkova a,b, Lucie Rault a,b, Patrice François d, Jacques Schrenzel d, Sergine Even a,b, David Hernandez d, Yves Le Loir a,b,
PMCID: PMC3486374  PMID: 23105046

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a major etiological agent of mastitis in ruminants. We report here the genome sequence of bovine strain Newbould 305, isolated in the 1950s in a case of bovine mastitis and now used as a model strain able to reproducibly induce chronic mastitis in cows.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the main pathogens responsible for ruminant mastitis. Staphylococcal mastitis severity is highly variable, ranging from subclinical to gangrenous infection. S. aureus strains isolated from bovine or ovine/caprine hosts differ from human isolates, as documented previously (4). However, detailed genomic data regarding ruminant isolates are still scarce (4, 5, 8, 10, 11). There is thus a need for genomic data to better understand mastitis and identify bacterial factors responsible for the severity of the disease.

We previously characterized S. aureus bovine strain Newbould 305 (ATCC 29740) (12), which was isolated in 1958 from a cow in Orangeville, Ontario, Canada, with a clinical case of mastitis (4, 12). Newbould 305 reproducibly induces chronic mastitis with mild symptoms in cases of experimental cow mastitis (2, 6). It was previously shown to be clonally related to other bovine strains in ST115, whereas S. aureus RF122, another well-documented bovine strain (8) associated with severe mastitis symptoms, clustered in ST151 and was more closely related to ovine and caprine strains yet at a considerable genetic distance (4).

We sequenced the Newbould 305 genome using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 genome analyzer (Fasteris, Geneva, Switzerland). Base calling was performed using the HiSeq Control Soft v. 1.4.8 Pipeline 1.4.0 software. After barcode selection, 12.8 million pair reads of 100 bases in length were obtained. Sequence reads were de novo assembled using the Edena assembler (7), version 120430dev. Assembly resulted in 28 contigs (sum, 2.79 Mbp; N50, 503 Kbp; maximum, 729 Kbp; minimum, 219 bp). One of the contigs (3,379 bases) was reported as a potential complete plasmid. A total of 2,755 predicted coding sequences (CDSs) were detected by using Glimmer3 (PubMed identification no. [PMID] 17237039). More than 55% of the genes were assigned to specific subsystem categories by RAST (1). Gene products were subjected to protein location prediction using the software package SurfG+ (3). The Newbould 305 sequence was compared to that of RF122 (ET3-1) using MUMmer (9). The overall Newbould 305 genome shows high similarity to that of RF122. The majority of the genes (n = 2,518) were common to both strains (E value, 1E−5; identity, >70%). A total of 48,371 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were found in Newbould 305 compared to RF122. Among the SNPs located in CDSs, 10,470 were nonsynonymous and 1,690 corresponded to insertions or deletions. They were evenly distributed among the contigs and did not correlate with protein location. Newbould 305 analysis revealed the presence of a putative prophage containing 45 CDSs (contig 5) and of two putative S. aureus pathogenicity islands (SaPI) containing 16 genes (contig 2) and 17 genes (contig 6). Most of these genes had homology to SaPI genes in S. aureus strains of bovine (RF122), ovine (O46), or human (MW2) origin. The contig that was reported as a potential plasmid was further confirmed by homology and was designated pNewbould305.

Further analysis of the Newbould 305 genome is now under way. It will be further compared to the RF122 genome to identify specific factors that might explain the different phenotypes observed in infection acuteness.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number AKYW00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, AKYW01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (NABAB project). Caroline Le Maréchal was the recipient of an INRA-ANSES Ph.D. grant. Sintia Almeida is the recipient of a CAPES-COEFCUB grant (project number 720/11). Damien Bouchard and Vincent Peton are recipients of a Ph.D. grant from the French Ministry of Research and from INRA and Region Bretagne, respectively.

We are thankful to P. Rainard (INRA Tours), who kindly provided the strain.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Aziz RK, et al. 2008. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bannerman DD, et al. 2004. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus elicit differential innate immune responses following intramammary infection. Clin. Diagn. Lab Immunol. 11:463–472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Barinov A, et al. 2009. Prediction of surface exposed proteins in Streptococcus pyogenes, with a potential application to other Gram-positive bacteria. Proteomics 9:61–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ben Zakour NL, et al. 2008. Genome-wide analysis of ruminant Staphylococcus aureus reveals diversification of the core genome. J. Bacteriol. 190:6302–6317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Guinane CM, et al. 2010. Evolutionary genomics of Staphylococcus aureus reveals insights into the origin and molecular basis of ruminant host adaptation. Genome Biol. Evol. 2:454–466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hensen SM, Pavicic MJ, Lohuis JA, de Hoog JA, Poutrel B. 2000. Location of Staphylococcus aureus within the experimentally infected bovine udder and the expression of capsular polysaccharide type 5 in situ. J. Dairy Sci. 83:1966–1975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hernandez D, Francois P, Farinelli L, Osteras M, Schrenzel J. 2008. De novo bacterial genome sequencing: millions of very short reads assembled on a desktop computer. Genome Res. 18:802–809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Herron-Olson L, Fitzgerald JR, Musser JM, Kapur V. 2007. Molecular correlates of host specialization in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 2:e1120 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kurtz S, et al. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5:R12 doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Le Marechal C, et al. 2011. Genome sequences of two Staphylococcus aureus ovine strains that induce severe (strain O11) and mild (strain O46) mastitis. J. Bacteriol. 193:2353–2354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Le Marechal C, et al. 2011. Molecular basis of virulence in Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. PLoS One 6:e27354 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Prasad LB, Newbould FH. 1968. Inoculation of the bovine teat duct with Staph. aureus: the relationship of teat duct length, milk yield and milking rate to development of intramammary infection. Can. Vet. J. 9:107–115 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES