Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2012 Nov;194(22):6088–6095. doi: 10.1128/JB.01361-12

Analysis of ThiC Variants in the Context of the Metabolic Network of Salmonella enterica

Lauren D Palmer 1, Michael J Dougherty 1,*, Diana M Downs 1,
PMCID: PMC3486400  PMID: 22961850

Abstract

In bacteria, the 4-amino-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine (HMP) moiety of thiamine is synthesized from 5-aminoimidazole ribotide (AIR), a branch point metabolite of purine and thiamine biosynthesis. ThiC is a member of the radical S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) superfamily and catalyzes the complex chemical rearrangement of AIR to HMP-P. As reconstituted in vitro, the ThiC reaction requires AdoMet, AIR, and reductant. This study analyzed variants of ThiC in vivo and in vitro to probe the metabolic network surrounding AIR in Salmonella enterica. Several variants of ThiC that required metabolic perturbations to function in vivo were biochemically characterized in vitro. Results presented herein indicate that the subtleties of the metabolic network have not been captured in the current reconstitution of the ThiC reaction.

INTRODUCTION

Thiamine pyrophosphate is an essential cofactor used by enzymes in central metabolism such as pyruvate dehydrogenase and α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase to stabilize the acyl carbanion (22). Thiamine is composed of two independently synthesized moieties, 4-methyl-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-thiazole (THZ) and 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine (HMP). In all bacteria characterized to date, the pyrimidine of thiamine is synthesized from a branch point in purine biosynthesis. In a single step, ThiC (HMP-P synthase) converts the branch point metabolite 5-aminoimidazole ribotide (AIR) to HMP-P (10, 27). HMP-P is sequentially phosphorylated and combined with THZ-P to generate thiamine monophosphate (2, 31) before a final phosphorylation generates the active cofactor (43) (Fig. 1).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Thiamine and purine biosynthesis in S. enterica. A schematic of thiamine synthesis is illustrated, with the gene products involved in purine biosynthesis shown near the relevant position in the pathway. The inset displays the fate of individual atoms in the synthesis of HMP-P from AIR on the basis of labeling studies (9, 1618, 26). Metabolic processes that impact ThiC activity in vivo are depicted. Stains lacking PurR are derepressed for all purine genes (not depicted). Abbreviations: AIR, 5-aminoimidazole ribotide; THZ-P, 4-methyl-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-thiazole HMP-P, 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine phosphate; TPP, thiamine pyrophosphate.

In vivo, thiamine synthesis is integrated with purine biosynthesis by the shared branch point metabolite AIR. During growth in minimal medium, the majority of flux through AIR is used for purine biosynthesis and a minor portion is diverted to thiamine biosynthesis. Nutritional studies suggest that a 1:1,000 ratio of flux to thiamine and purine synthesis would satisfy both requirements (1). Despite its role as a precursor to HMP-P, the synthesis of AIR is not regulated by thiamine; this fact raises the question of how Salmonella enterica ensures that the thiamine requirement of the cell is satisfied under conditions where purine biosynthesis is repressed. Significantly, the natural gut habitat of Salmonella has excess purines (39). This suggests that during steady-state growth in the gut, PurF (amidophosphoribosyltransferase, EC 2.4.2.14) is allosterically inhibited and the flux through the purine pathway is low (44).

Results of a number of studies have shown that when purine biosynthetic flux is reduced, thiamine synthesis is maintained, suggesting that the metabolites flow to thiamine synthesis prior to purines. Mutants with less than 1% wild-type activity of the purine biosynthetic enzyme PurI (AIR synthetase, EC 6.3.3.1) require purines but not thiamine (1). Furthermore, several pathways recruited to feed into the purine pathway, by forming either phosphoribosylamine (PRA) or AIR, satisfy the thiamine but not purine requirement of the cell (4, 15, 24, 30, 32, 33). In other words, in a wild-type cell, the partitioning of flux to thiamine biosynthesis is relatively insensitive to changes in flux to AIR. This type of insensitivity is thought to be characteristic of systems when the substrate concentration is well above the enzyme Km value (5). Thus, the ThiC Km for AIR is expected to be lower than the AIR concentration in the cell; however, this hypothesis cannot be addressed with current enzymatic assays of ThiC. It is possible that ThiC variants can be used to probe the AIR branch point because the sensitivity of the branch point can amplify relatively small changes in enzyme characteristics (25). It follows that this system could also be used to monitor subtle changes in the metabolic network.

In S. enterica, a number of metabolic perturbations have been shown to impact the conversion of AIR to HMP-P by ThiC. In vivo experiments found that compromised iron-sulfur ([Fe-S]) cluster metabolism reduced ThiC activity, results that contributed to the identification of the [Fe-S] requirement of this protein (13). In other studies, strains with reduced coenzyme A (CoA) levels and those that accumulated the purine intermediate 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribotide (AICAR) have less ThiC-dependent growth in vivo (1, 20). Neither CoA nor AICAR had a demonstrable effect on the ThiC reaction in vitro, raising the question of how the respective perturbations were affecting the activity of the enzyme in vivo (N. C. Martinez-Gomez and D. M. Downs, unpublished data).

Work on ThiC in the past 5 years has established an in vitro assay and begun to define some of its biochemical parameters. ThiC is a dimeric member of the radical S-adenosylmethionine (SAM or AdoMet) superfamily of proteins that use an [4Fe-4S] cluster and SAM or AdoMet to carry out radical-mediated catalysis (10, 27, 34). In the presence of AdoMet and reductant in vitro, ThiC converts AIR to HMP-P, carbon monoxide, and formate (9). A structure of Caulobacter crescentus ThiC without the [Fe-S] cluster was solved (10), and modeling both the cluster and the active site has provided insights into the reaction mechanism of this protein. A catalytic mechanism for the conversion of AIR to HMP-P has been proposed on the basis of data that suggested that the 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical sequentially abstracts two hydrogen atoms from AIR in the reaction (9). Despite the recent progress in our understanding of HMP-P synthesis, the ThiC reaction mechanism has not been fully characterized and enzymatic turnover has not yet been achieved. We suggest that better understanding of the metabolic environment relevant to ThiC in vivo may aid in improving enzyme activity in vitro.

This study was initiated to use our ability to analyze the in vivo system and characteristics of the in vitro ThiC assay to query changes in the cellular environment that are caused by specific metabolic perturbations. Specifically, we sought to use ThiC variants that required perturbations in metabolism to function in vivo as a means to better understand how ThiC is integrated in the metabolic network and whether the in vitro assay adequately reflects the cellular properties relevant to the function of ThiC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains, media, and chemicals.

The strains used in this study were derived from S. enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 and are listed in Table 1. The indicated thiC alleles and a linked marker [zxx-8039::Tn10d(Tc), where Tn10d(Tc) refers to the transposition-defective mini-Tn10 described by Way et al. (42)] are present in each of four strain backgrounds: wild type, purE3043, purR3090, and purE3043 purR3090.

Table 1.

Strains used in this studya

thiC allele Protein variant Mutagenb Conditional auxotrophc Strain
Wild type purE purR purE purR
Wild type NA DM7778 DM13262 DM13850 DM13274
thiC1076 G486D HA N DM4003 DM13264 DM13276
thiC1128 E281K HA Y DM7777 DM13292 DM13851 DM13295
thiC1129 V267 M HA Y DM7779 DM13293 DM13852 DM13296
thiC1130 S247F HA N DM7781 DM13263 DM13275
thiC1140 R397H HA N DM13314 DM13265 DM13277
thiC1141 G481S HA N DM13315 DM13286 DM13290
thiC1142 D468N HA N DM13316 DM13266 DM13278
thiC1143 G479R HA N DM13317 DM13287 DM13291
thiC1144 H501Y HA N DM13318 DM13267 DM13279
thiC1145 G472D HA N DM13319 DM13268 DM13280
thiC1146 G92D HA Y DM13320 DM13269 DM13853 DM13281
thiC1147 G273N HA Y DM13321 DM13288 DM13854 DM13297
thiC1158 A527T NTG Y DM13322 DM13294 DM13855 DM13298
thiC1159 D509G NTG Y DM13323 DM13289 DM13856 DM13299
thiC1161 P498L NTG Y DM13324 DM13270 DM13857 DM13282
thiC1163 G355D NTG N DM13325 DM13271 DM13283
thiC1171 R544C NTG N DM13326 DM13272 DM13284
thiC1172 D61N, G513E NTG N DM13327 DM13273 DM13284
a

thiC mutant alleles are listed with the predicted protein variant, mutagen used to generate the allele, and corresponding strain numbers in various genetic backgrounds.

b

Generated by hydroxylamine (HA) (23) or nitrosoguanidine (NTG) (12) mutagenesis.

c

Depicts whether the relevant allele can support thiamine synthesis sufficient for growth under any tested condition. NA, not applicable; Y, yes; N, no.

Rich medium (NB) is Difco nutrient broth (8 g/liter) with NaCl (5 g/liter). Superbroth (SB) is tryptone (32 g/liter), yeast extract (20 g/liter), and NaCl (5 g/liter) with NaOH (0.05 N). Minimal medium is no-carbon essential (NCE) medium supplemented with MgSO4 (1 mM), trace minerals (0.1×; adapted from Balch et al. [3]), and glucose (11 mM). Difco BiTek agar was added (15 g/liter) for solid medium. When present in the medium, supplements were provided at the following concentrations: thiamine, 100 nM; HMP, 100 nM; adenine, 0.4 mM; methionine, 0.3 mM; pantothenate, 50 μM. Antibiotics were added at the following concentrations in rich and minimal media: ampicillin (Ap), 150 mg/liter and 30 mg/liter, respectively; tetracycline (Tc), 20 mg/liter and 10 mg/liter, respectively; kanamycin (Km), 50 mg/liter and 12.5 mg/liter, respectively. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO.

Mutant isolation and strain construction.

A lysate of P22 (HT 105/1 int201 [36, 40]) was generated on strain DM851 that had been mutagenized with nitrosoguanidine (NTG) (12). Alternatively, a P22 lysate grown on strain DM851 was mutagenized by hydroxylamine (HA) (23). DM851 carries zxx-8039::Tn10d(Tc), which is ∼80% linked to the thi locus. Each lysate was used to transduce a wild-type strain to Tcr. Tcr transductants were screened for those that required exogenous thiamine or HMP for growth under one of three conditions: (i) in the presence of exogenous adenine, (ii) in a purF mutant background, or (iii) at increased temperature. After isolation, the thiC alleles were transduced into the appropriate backgrounds by P22. An isogenic pair (thiC+ and thiC mutant alleles) from each transduction was purified to be phage-free and saved (8). In the backgrounds where the thiC alleles did not display thiamine auxotrophy, the presence of the mutation was confirmed by backcrosses. Accumulation of the ThiC variant proteins in the wild-type background was verified by Western blot analysis.

Growth analysis.

Cells from overnight cultures in NB medium were pelleted and resuspended in an equal volume of saline (0.85% NaCl), and a 5-μl aliquot was used to inoculate 195 μl of the appropriate minimal medium. Growth was quantified in a 96-well plate using a microplate reader (model EL808; Bio-Tek Instruments). Cell density was measured as the optical density (OD) at 650 nm (OD650), and growth was reported as a specific growth rate [μ, which is equal to ln(X/X0)/T, where X is OD650 and X0 is the initial OD650 value of the period analyzed during exponential growth and T is the time (in h)].

Expression and purification of Fpr/FldA.

Plasmids to express S. enterica flavoprotein reductase (Fpr) and flavodoxin (FldA) were constructed with pET-28b(+) (Novagen) using the NheI and XhoI sites. Fpr and FldA were individually expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3) (Novagen). In each case, a 10-ml overnight culture grown in SB with Ap was used to inoculate two 2.8-liter Fernbach flasks, each containing 1.5 liters of SB with Ap. The culture was incubated at 37°C with shaking to an OD650 of approximately 0.9, isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to 1 mM, and incubation was continued overnight at 28°C with shaking. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended to 30 ml buffer A (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5). Lysozyme (30 mg) and DNase (2 mg) were added, and the cells were lysed by two passages through a French pressure cell at 1,500 lb/in2. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 41,400 × g for 45 min, filtered with a 0.45-μm-pore-size polyethersulfone filter (Whatman), and loaded on an Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) Superflow (Qiagen) column (7 ml). For both Fpr and FldA preparations, the column was washed with 75 ml buffer A and then 25 ml with 97% buffer A and 3% buffer B (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 500 mM imidazole, 500 mM Na2SO4). The proteins were then eluted with a linear gradient (3 to 100% buffer B) over 10 column volumes. The proteins were concentrated and flavin adenine dinucleotide and flavin mononucleotide were added to 1 mM final concentrations to Fpr and FldA, respectively. The proteins were then dialyzed into 2× 1 liter buffer A and then 1 liter freezing buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol). The proteins were dropped into liquid nitrogen, and the beads were stored at −80°C. The protein concentration was determined by Pierce 660 (Pierce) assay using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard. The Fpr concentration was 9.2 mg/ml (0.3 mM), and the FldA concentration was 6.7 mg/ml (0.3 mM).

Expression and purification of ThiC.

Wild-type and mutant thiC were cloned into pET-28b(+) using the NheI and XhoI sites. These plasmids were coelectroporated into E. coli strain BL21AI (Novagen) with plasmid pDB1282, which expresses Azotobacter vinelandii [Fe-S] cluster-loading genes (iscSUA, hscBA, fdx, orf3, ndK) (11). Two 2.8-liter Fernbach flasks with 1.5 liters SB, Ap, and Km were each inoculated with 10 ml of an overnight culture of the appropriate strain. The cultures were incubated at 37°C with shaking to an OD650 of 0.3. Arabinose was added to 0.2% to induce expression of the nif genes, and FeCl3 was added to 100 μM. Incubation continued for 3 h, before expression of thiC was induced by adding IPTG to a final concentration of 1 mM, and incubation was continued with shaking overnight at 15°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 15 min. Cell pellets were routinely stored at −80°C until use.

All manipulations with ThiC proteins were carried out in a Coy glove box maintained at <2 ppm oxygen, as detected by an oxygen sensor (Coy Laboratory Products, Inc.). The cell pellet from 3 liters culture (generally, 15 to 25 g cell wet weight) was resuspended to 30 ml with anoxic buffer A (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 200 mM Na2SO4, 12% glycerol). Cells were incubated on ice with lysozyme (4 mg/ml) and DNase (2 mg) for a minimum of 10 min before sonication. Sonication was performed on ice, with 30 s of sonication and 1-min rests for 15 min using a 60 Sonic Dismembrator (Fisher Scientific) emitting 15 to 25 W. The cell lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 48,000 × g for 45 to 60 min in sealed Oakridge tubes outside the glove box. The clarified lysate was returned to the glove box, filtered, and applied to an Ni-NTA Superflow resin column (6 ml) equilibrated in buffer A. The column was washed with approximately 10 column volumes of buffer A, followed by approximately 5 column volumes of 97% buffer A, 3% buffer B (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 200 mM Na2SO4, 12% glycerol, 500 mM imidazole). ThiC was eluted by a linear gradient of 3 to 100% buffer B over 5 column volumes. Peak elution of wild-type ThiC and the variants was at approximately 45% buffer B or ∼230 mM imidazole. Brown fractions were pooled and desalted into buffer A by a PD-10 Sephadex G-25 column (GE Healthcare). The desalted protein was concentrated in a 50,000-molecular-weight-cutoff centrifugal filter unit (Amicon) at 2,400 × g in sealed centrifuge tubes outside the glove box. To allow comparison of iron loading between the ThiC variants, the proteins were not reconstituted. An aliquot of protein was removed from the glove box. The concentration was then measured by Pierce 660 assay using BSA as a standard, and the concentration was adjusted to 500 μM. ThiC was then aliquoted into sealed serum vials (Wheaton) for storage at −80°C. Protein concentration was validated by amino acid analysis and found to be within 10% of that measured by the Pierce 660 assay with the BSA standard (Molecular Structure Facility, University of California, Davis, CA). Wild-type ThiC and the variants were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie stain. Each preparation was >95% pure, as analyzed by TotalLab gel analysis software, and the dominant band was at the position expected for the molecular weight.

Synthesis of AIR.

AIR was synthesized using a modification of a previous protocol (28). In a typical synthesis, 36 mg AICAR (Sigma) was dissolved in 5 ml 4 N LiOH and saponified to 5-amino-4-imidazolecarboxylic acid ribotide (CAIR) by heating in a 100-ml round-bottom flask attached to a reflux condenser in a paraffin oil bath maintained at 120°C for 4 h. After it was removed from the heat, condensate was collected with 10 ml double-distilled H2O, and the pH of the mixture was adjusted to 7.0 with 1 N acetic acid. The neutralized mixture was frozen in liquid nitrogen in two 50-ml conical tubes and lyophilized to a white powder. The powder was dissolved in 25 ml 100% ethanol and vortexed for 1 min. After 5 min, the insoluble CAIR was pelleted by centrifuging at 48,000 × g for 5 min, and the supernatant was discarded. This wash step was repeated four times before the final pellet was resuspended in 10 ml ethanol, aliquoted into eppi tubes, and dried by centrifugation under vacuum. Powdered CAIR was stored at −20°C until use.

AIR was synthesized enzymatically from CAIR by Treponema denticola AIR carboxylase (TdPurE; EC 5.4.99.18). TdPurE was expressed from pJK376 and was purified as previously described (41). The TdPurE (7.0 mg/ml, 0.4 mM) was frozen in beads in liquid nitrogen prior to storage at −80°C. To synthesize AIR, an aliquot of CAIR was dissolved in 50 μl reaction buffer (50 mM N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl-3-aminopropanesulfonic acid sodium-potassium salt, [(2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl)amino]-1-propanesulfonic (TAPS) buffer, pH 8.0) and incubated with 20 nM TdPurE for 30 min at 30°C. The reaction was stopped by heat treatment (80°C, 3 min), and protein was pelleted by centrifugation at 21,100 × g for 1 min. The AIR-containing supernatant was retained and used in ThiC assays within 12 h.

ThiC assays.

Fpr, FldA, methylthioadenosine nucleosidase (MTAN; 3.2.2.16), and AIR were degassed with nitrogen for 10 min in sealed Eppendorf tubes prior to entering the glove box. SAMe (NatureMade) was used as the AdoMet source because high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis determined that it is 88% biologically active S,S-AdoMet (data not shown), a significant improvement over the AdoMet available from Sigma, which is approximately 43% pure and contaminated by inhibiting AdoMet-related biomolecules (19). SAMe was crushed to form a powder and then moved into the glove box, resuspended in anaerobic reaction buffer, and passed through a Spin-X filter (Corning). Aliquots of AIR and AdoMet were removed from the glove box, and their concentrations were determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) using the extinction coefficients ε260 equal to 1,570 M−1 cm−1 and ε259 equal to 15,400 M−1 cm−1, respectively (6, 29). Because SAMe was 88% pure AdoMet, the concentration in the assay was calculated accordingly.

In a typical reaction, ThiC (50 μM), MTAN (800 nM), Fpr (10 μM), FldA (20 μM), and NADPH (1 mM) were incubated for 10 min at room temperature before adding AdoMet (25 μM to 250 μM) and AIR (25 μM to 250 μM) to a final volume of 50 μl. Fpr, FldA, and NADPH were provided to reduce the ThiC [Fe-S] cluster. MTAN was provided to remove 5′-deoxyadenosine from the reaction mixture, which has been shown to inhibit other radical SAM enzymes (7, 19). The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C in the anaerobic chamber for 1 h, the reaction was stopped by heat treatment (85°C for 3 min), and the reaction mixtures were frozen at −20°C before analysis, if necessary.

Quantification of HMP by HPLC.

The heat-denatured protein was pelleted from the reaction mixture by centrifugation at 21,100 × g for 1 min, and the supernatant was moved to a new eppi tube. In our hands, the ThiC reaction often produces a mixture of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated HMP; in order to convert all product to HMP, rAPid alkaline phosphatase (Roche) was added to the supernatant (1 μl alkaline phosphatase/50 μl assay mixture) and the mixture was incubated for 15 min at 37°C. The mixture was then heat treated (3 min at 80°C) to inactivate the alkaline phosphatase. The denatured enzyme was pelleted by centrifugation at 21,100 × g for 1 min, and the supernatant was transferred to an HPLC autosampler vial (Macherey-Nagel). Five-microliter injections of the reaction mixtures were separated by reversed-phase HPLC with an LC-20AT delivery system (Shimadzu) equipped with a 250- by 4.6-mm Luna C182, 5-μm chromatography resolution column (Phenomenex). The column was equilibrated with 90% mobile phase A (20 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) and 10% mobile phase B (methanol). The separation used a flow rate of 1 ml min−1 with 90% mobile phase A and 10% mobile phase B for 10 min, followed by a linear gradient to 50% mobile phase B over 20 min. Components eluted from the column were monitored with a photodiode array detector (wavelengths, 190 to 350 nm), with data extracted at 235 nm. The HMP peak was identified by (i) the biological activity of the collected fractions, (ii) a UV spectrum matching that of authentic HMP, (iii) coelution with authentic HMP, and (iv) mass spectrometry. For mass spectrometry, the University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center Mass Spectrometry/Proteomics Facility performed standard mass spectrometry in positive mode. HMP was quantified by comparison to a standard curve of authentic HMP (provided by JoAnn Stubbe, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), which was determined using the extinction coefficient ε268 equal to 4,266 M−1 cm−1 (M. Parker and J. Stubbe, personal communication).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Eighteen mutant alleles of thiC were isolated, sequenced, and reconstructed in four different genetic backgrounds (Table 1). Eleven of the 18 alleles of thiC caused a requirement for HMP or thiamine under all conditions tested. Three of these variants had substitutions in residues in the predicted active site (10): ThiCG355D, ThiCR397H, and ThiCH501Y (Fig. 2). The isolation of these alleles in an unbiased screen for loss of function supported the assignment of these residues to the active site by the modeled ThiC structure (10). The other eight null variants had substitutions that were near the active site in the tertiary structure. Four of these variants, ThiCG355D, ThiCG472D, ThiCG481S, and ThiCG486D, had substitutions of glycine residues in α helices, and the disruption of helical structure could explain their enzymatic defect.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Primary sequence of ThiC with position of variants. Residues in the predicted active site, based on C. crescentus ThiC (10), were identified in S. enterica ThiC by using Clustal (version 2.1) program sequence alignment and are outlined with a dashed line. Residues that are substituted in variants identified in this study are highlighted on the basis of the phenotype that their presence causes in vivo: null phenotype (black) and conditional thiamine auxotrophs (gray). Asterisks above the residues indicate that their null phenotype was characterized by site-directed mutagenesis in a previous study (13).

The remaining seven alleles of thiC supported thiamine synthesis in vivo under certain conditions and were characterized further to understand the impact of the cellular environment on their activity. Specifically, the variants were characterized for the ability to support thiamine synthesis in genetic backgrounds and with growth conditions that had predictable consequences for the metabolic network.

Purine pathway flux impacts the activity of some ThiC variants.

In an otherwise wild-type genetic background, three thiC alleles allowed growth at or near wild-type levels in minimal medium, but the strains were unable to grow when adenine was present in the medium, unless thiamine was added (Table 2). On the basis of this phenotype, these variants, ThiCE281K, ThiCV267M, and ThiCG92D, were designated “adenine sensitive.” Because purine biosynthesis is regulated at both transcriptional and posttranslational levels (37, 44), addition of exogenous adenine is expected to decrease flux through the pathway and therefore lower the AIR concentration in the cell (30). On the basis of this assumption, these data suggested that the adenine-sensitive ThiC variants required more AIR than the wild-type protein to function in vivo.

Table 2.

Growth reflects that thiamine synthesis is allowed by thiC alleles

Alleleb Protein Growth ratea (h−1)
Ade None purE Ade purE purR Ade purR Ade
Wild type 0.58 ± 0.01 0.68 ± 0.06 0.53 ± 0.01 0.50 ± 0.04 0.64 ± 0.04
thiC1128 ThiCE281K 0.07 ± 0.04 0.62 ± 0.08 0.21 ± 0.01 0.43 ± 0.02 0.56 ± 0.03
thiC1129 ThiCV267 M 0.07 ± 0.03 0.54 ± 0.06 0.20 ± 0.07 0.49 ± 0.01 0.16 ± 0.03
thiC1147 ThiCG273N 0.02 ± 0.03 0.01 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.00 0.08 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.01
thiC1158 ThiCA527T 0.01 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.02 0.39 ± 0.03 0.02 ± 0.02
thiC1159 ThiCD509G 0.05 ± 0.04 0.01 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.03 0.24 ± 0.01 0.01 ± 0.01
thiC1161 ThiCP498L 0.01 ± 0.00 0.03 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.02 0.30 ± 0.07 0.01 ± 0.01
Wild typec 0.26 ± 0.01 0.31 ± 0.02 0.35 ± 0.04 0.33 ± 0.02 0.45 ± 0.02
thiC1146 ThiCG92Dc 0.00 ± 0.01 0.24 ± 0.02 0.26 ± 0.02 0.24 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.01
a

Growth rate is reported as μ, which is equal to ln(X/X0)/T, where X is OD650, X0 is the initial OD650 value of the period analyzed during exponential growth, and T is the time (in h). Under all conditions, the addition of thiamine resulted in a growth rate of 0.42 to 0.87 h−1 (data not shown). Data shown are the average and standard deviation of three independent cultures. Data from each condition were collected on the same day. Strains were grown at 37°C in minimal medium with no supplement or with adenine (Ade; 0.4 mM), as indicated.

b

Each allele was present in a strain with the indicated additional genotype.

c

Strains were grown at 30°C.

While exogenous adenine is expected to reduce AIR levels in vivo, it potentially has additional effects on the metabolic network. To test the hypothesis that the adenine-sensitive variants were in fact sensitive to AIR levels, growth was tested in genetic backgrounds that retained high levels of AIR, despite the presence of adenine. PurK [5-(carboxyamino) imidazole ribonucleotide synthase, EC 6.3.4.18] and PurE [5-(carboxyamino) imidazole ribonucleotide mutase, EC 5.4.99.18] catalyze the enzymatic steps in the purine biosynthetic pathway that consume AIR. The purE3043 allele is expected to result in the accumulation of AIR in the presence of exogenous adenine (14, 30). The purE3043 allele restored thiamine synthesis in strains with ThiCE281K and ThiCV267M variants, as judged by the growth rate of ∼0.20 h−1 compared to one of ∼0.07 h−1 in adenine medium (Table 2). ThiCG92D is a temperature-sensitive variant, and at 30°C in the presence of purE3043, the growth rate in adenine was fully restored to that in minimal medium (∼0.24 h−1). Interrupting the gene encoding the purine repressor (PurR) further increased the growth rate of these strains in adenine medium, consistent with a need of the variants for higher AIR accumulation (30, 38). Finally, the ThiCD509G variant supported growth only in the purE purR genetic background, suggesting that it had the highest requirement for AIR among the variants. We interpreted these results to mean that the adenine-sensitive variants required increased levels of AIR to function in vivo. Taken together, these data suggested that the ThiCE281K, ThiCV267M, ThiCD509G, and ThiCG92D variants would require a higher concentration of AIR than the wild-type enzyme to function in vitro.

Exogenous methionine or increased expression of AdoMet synthetase restores function to some ThiC variants.

ThiC requires AdoMet as a cosubstrate for radical catalysis (10, 27), so changes to the metabolic network that impact AdoMet were predicted to alter growth of some thiC mutant strains. Because addition of exogenous methionine to the medium has been shown to elevate AdoMet levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida utilis yeasts (21), the thiC mutant strains were screened for growth on minimal medium with exogenous methionine. The growth of two strains, encoding variants ThiCG273N and ThiCP498L, was greatly improved by the addition of methionine. Significantly, growth of these same strains was improved by the presence of the plasmid pMETK2, which encodes MetK (AdoMet synthetase, EC 2.1.5.6) (Fig. 3). The presence of pMETK2 increased AdoMet in the cell by 5-fold (S. Wang and P. A. Frey, personal communication). Plasmid pMETK2 did not improve the growth of a strain containing the null ThiCH501Y variant, supporting the conclusion that AdoMet, and not thiamine, was increased by the presence of this plasmid (data not shown). These results suggested that addition of exogenous methionine increases AdoMet levels in S. enterica, as it was previously shown to do in yeasts (21). Further, these in vivo phenotypes suggested that the ThiCG273N and ThiCP498L variants would have a higher requirement for AdoMet than wild-type ThiC when assayed in vitro.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Either methionine or induction of S-adenosylmethionine biosynthesis allowed growth of strains containing ThiCG273N or ThiCP498L. (A) Growth of the strain containing ThiCG273N (thiC1147, DM13321); (B) growth of the strain containing ThiCP498L (thiC1161, DM13224). Strains were grown in minimal medium and arabinose (0.2%) with no additions (squares), addition of methionine (triangles), or addition of thiamine (circles). Strains containing an empty vector are depicted with open symbols, while those containing pMETK2 are depicted with filled symbols. Data shown are the average and standard deviation of three independent cultures.

Exogenous pantothenate stimulates the growth rate of ThiCA527T.

Conversion of AIR to HMP-P in vivo is sensitive to the CoA levels in the cell (1, 20). CoA has no demonstrable effect on ThiC activity in vitro; therefore, we predicted that the CoA effect was mediated through another reaction component, i.e., AIR, AdoMet, or the [Fe-S] cluster. Each thiC mutant strain was screened for growth stimulation by pantothenate because exogenous pantothenate elevates endogenous CoA levels (20). Growth of a single strain, DM13294, which carried both purE3043 and thiC1158, was stimulated by exogenous pantothenate (Fig. 4). This result suggested that the ThiCA527T variant responded to the reaction component affected in vivo by CoA levels. The finding that pantothenate stimulated growth only when the purE3043 mutation was present implicated the AIR concentration in the effects of CoA on ThiC activity in vivo.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

The growth rate of a strain containing ThiCA527T in a purE mutant background is increased by exogenous pantothenate. Strain DM13294 (thiC1158 purE3043) was grown in NCE glucose medium supplemented with adenine (0.4 mM) and no additions (squares), addition of pantothenate (diamonds), and addition of thiamine (circles). Data shown are the average and standard deviation of three independent cultures.

ThiC variants are generally defective in activity in vitro.

The different phenotypic behaviors of the thiC mutant strains suggested that the biochemical properties of the ThiC variants would be distinguishable from each other and from those of the wild-type protein. Due to limitations of HMP detection at low enzyme concentrations and the inability to achieve enzyme turnover, which is common for SAM radical proteins (35), Michaelis-Menten kinetic models could not be used to analyze the assay results. Wild-type ThiC and four variants of ThiC (V267M, G273N, A527T, D509G) were purified, and the activity was determined in assays using 50 μM protein, 250 μM AIR, and 250 μM AdoMet over 1 h. The data in Table 3 show that with these reaction conditions, each of the variants was significantly compromised in activity. The iron content of the variants was similar to that of wild type (data not shown); however, a conformational difference between the [Fe-S] cluster of the wild-type and mutant proteins could explain the activity difference in vivo. There was no condition where the growth rates (Table 2) of the strains expressing the respective thiC alleles were proportional to the ThiC variant activity in vitro.

Table 3.

ThiC variants have reduced activitya

ThiC variant Amt of HMP produced (nmol)
Wild type 2.59 ± 0.31
ThiCV267 M 0.73 ± 0.02
ThiCG273N 0.38 ± 0.05
ThiCD509G 0.43 ± 0.06
ThiCA527T 1.44 ± 0.30
a

Each reaction mixture contained the relevant ThiC protein at 50 μM, and both AdoMet and AIR were present at 250 μM. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37°C and heat quenched at 85°C for 3 min; detailed reaction conditions are described in Materials and Methods. Data for wild-type protein are the average and standard deviation of eight replicates. Data for each variant protein are the average and standard deviation of four replicates.

Similarly, independent titrations of AIR and AdoMet concentrations with purified variant protein failed to provide insights into how the activity correlated with in vivo results. The activity of variants ThiCG273N and ThiCD509G was not significantly different over the range of AIR or AdoMet concentrations used (data not shown). This result was unexpected for ThiCG273N, which allowed wild-type levels of in vivo growth when internal AdoMet levels were elevated by either methionine or pMETK (Fig. 3). The constant weak activity of ThiCD509G was not unexpected, given the complex nutritional environment needed to generate wild-type growth with this variant. In contrast, the activities of both ThiCV267M and ThiCA527T were affected by the concentration of AIR and AdoMet (Fig. 5). In the case of ThiCV267M, the activity did not require an elevated level of AIR, as predicted from the in vivo growth. The variants' lower specific activity could be caused by thermal instability in the 1-h incubation; however, instability would not explain the lack of the expected response to the substrate concentration.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

ThiC variants are compromised for HMP formation regardless of substrate concentration. Total HMP formed in 1 h by 50 μM ThiC proteins with various concentrations of substrate is shown. Data are shown for ThiC (triangles), ThiCV267M (squares), and ThiCA527T (circles). (A) Reaction mixtures contained 250 μM SAM and the indicated concentration of AIR; (B) reaction mixtures contained 250 μM AIR and the indicated concentration of SAM. Data points are the average and standard deviation of two replicates.

ThiCA527T had wild-type activity with low concentrations of either AIR or AdoMet, yet the best in vivo growth supported by this variant required conditions thought to increase AIR. Exogenous pantothenate had a positive impact on the growth of strains carrying this variant, which suggested that the biochemical characteristics of the ThiCA527T variant would reveal the role of CoA. However, the ThiCA527T variant's response to substrate concentrations and its iron content were similar to those of wild-type ThiC; thus, no particular reaction component could be implicated in the CoA effect. Further studies into the role of CoA in the ThiC reaction will screen specifically for variants that require higher CoA levels and may provide greater insight into this metabolic connection.

Conclusions.

The different in vivo behaviors of thiC mutant strains indicated that the variant proteins had different capacities and/or requirements for HMP synthesis. On the basis of knowledge of the relevant pathways and metabolites, simple predictions about characteristics of the variant proteins were made. The finding that the variants failed to act as predicted in vitro suggested that (i) simplistic explanations or the metabolic changes caused by mutations and/or nutrients were incorrect or (ii) the in vitro reconstitution of ThiC activity was not adequately representing in vivo conditions. These two scenarios are not mutually exclusive, and we expect that the lack of correlation between in vivo growth behavior and in vitro activity reflected a combination of the two scenarios. For example, the metabolic network may be providing unanticipated metabolites and/or proteins that are crucial for optimal ThiC activity in vivo but have not yet been identified and are therefore not present in the in vitro assay. Regardless of the specific explanation for the lack of correlation between in vivo and in vitro results, this study highlights the need for caution when extrapolating between in vitro and in vivo conditions. When conditions that allow ThiC to turn over in vitro have been identified, refinement of the assay can strive to detect the expected correlation between in vivo behavior and in vitro properties.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Mackenzie Parker and JoAnne Stubbe for providing authentic HMP and HMP-P, their molar extinction coefficients, and guidance for HPLC separation of the ThiC reaction products. We also acknowledge the helpful discussion about ThiC enzymology with George Reed. We thank Jannell Bazurto for the purified MTAN. We thank Nicole Buan and Jorge Escalante for plasmid pMETK2, Dennis Dean for plasmid pDB1282, and Joseph Kappock for plasmid pJK376 and an aliquot of purified TdPurE.

National Institutes of Health grant GM47296 and support from the 21st Century Scientists Scholars program from the J. M. McDonnell Foundation to D.M.D. supported this work. L.D.P. was supported by NSF through Graduate Research Fellowship grant DGE-0718123.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 7 September 2012

REFERENCES

  • 1. Allen S, Zilles JL, Downs DM. 2002. Metabolic flux in both the purine mononucleotide and histidine biosynthetic pathways can influence synthesis of the hydroxymethyl pyrimidine moiety of thiamine in Salmonella enterica. J. Bacteriol. 184:6130–6137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Backstrom AD, Mcmordie RAS, Begley TP. 1995. Biosynthesis of thiamin I: the function of the thiE gene product. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117:2351–2352 [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Balch WE, Fox GE, Magrum LJ, Woese CR, Wolfe RS. 1979. Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol. Rev. 43:260–296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bazurto JV, Downs DM. 2011. Plasticity in the purine-thiamine metabolic network of Salmonella. Genetics 187:623–631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bennett BD, et al. 2009. Absolute metabolite concentrations and implied enzyme active site occupancy in Escherichia coli. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5:593–599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bock RM, Ling NS, Morell SA, Lipton SH. 1956. Ultraviolet absorption spectra of adenosine-5′-triphosphate and related 5′-ribonucleotides. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 62:253–264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Challand MR, et al. 2009. Product inhibition in the radical S-adenosylmethionine family. FEBS Lett. 583:1358–1362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Chan RK, Botstein D, Watanabe T, Ogata Y. 1972. Specialized transduction of tetracycline resistance by phage P22 in Salmonella typhimurium. II. Properties of a high-frequency-transducing lysate. Virology 50:883–898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chatterjee A, Hazra AB, Abdelwahed S, Hilmey DG, Begley TP. 2010. A “radical dance” in thiamin biosynthesis: mechanistic analysis of the bacterial hydroxymethylpyrimidine phosphate synthase. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 49:8653–8656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Chatterjee A, et al. 2008. Reconstitution of ThiC in thiamine pyrimidine biosynthesis expands the radical SAM superfamily. Nat. Chem. Biol. 4:758–765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Cicchillo RM, et al. 2004. Escherichia coli lipoyl synthase binds two distinct [4Fe-4S] clusters per polypeptide. Biochemistry 43:11770–11781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Davis RW, Botstein D, Roth JR. 1980. Advanced bacterial genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Dougherty MJ, Downs DM. 2006. A connection between iron-sulfur cluster metabolism and the biosynthesis of 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine pyrophosphate in Salmonella enterica. Microbiology 152:2345–2353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Dougherty MJ, Downs DM. 2004. A mutant allele of rpoD results in increased conversion of aminoimidazole ribotide to hydroxymethyl pyrimidine in Salmonella enterica. J. Bacteriol. 186:4034–4037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Enos-Berlage JL, Langendorf MJ, Downs DM. 1998. Complex metabolic phenotypes caused by a mutation in yjgF, encoding a member of the highly conserved YER057c/YjgF family of proteins. J. Bacteriol. 180:6519–6528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Estramareix B, David S. 1990. Conversion of 5-aminoimidazole ribotide to the pyrimidine of thiamin in enterobacteria: study of the pathway with specifically labeled samples of riboside. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1035:154–160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Estramareix B, Lesieur M. 1969. Biosynthesis of the pyrimidine portion of thiamine: source of carbons 2 and 4 in Salmonella typhimurium. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 192:375–377 (In French.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Estramareix B, Therisod M. 1984. Biosynthesis of thiamine: 5-aminoimidazole ribotide as the precursor of all the carbon atoms of the pyrimidine moiety. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106:3857–3860 [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Farrar CE, Siu KK, Howell PL, Jarrett JT. 2010. Biotin synthase exhibits burst kinetics and multiple turnovers in the absence of inhibition by products and product-related biomolecules. Biochemistry 49:9985–9996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Frodyma M, Rubio A, Downs DM. 2000. Reduced flux through the purine biosynthetic pathway results in an increased requirement for coenzyme A in thiamine synthesis in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 182:236–240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Holcomb ER, Shapiro SK. 1975. Assay and regulation of S-adenosylmethionine synthetase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida utilis. J. Bacteriol. 121:267–271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hong J, et al. 1998. Transition-state theoretical interpretation of the catalytic power of pyruvate decarboxylases: the roles of static and dynamical considerations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1385:187–200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hong JS, Ames BN. 1971. Localized mutagenesis of any specific small region of the bacterial chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 68:3158–3162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Koenigsknecht MJ, Fenlon LA, Downs DM. 2010. Phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase (PrsA) variants alter cellular pools of ribose 5-phosphate and influence thiamine synthesis in Salmonella enterica. Microbiology 156:950–959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. LaPorte DC, Walsh K, Koshland DE., Jr 1984. The branch point effect. Ultrasensitivity and subsensitivity to metabolic control. J. Biol. Chem. 259:14068–14075 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lawhorn BG, Mehl RA, Begley TP. 2004. Biosynthesis of the thiamin pyrimidine: the reconstitution of a remarkable rearrangement reaction. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2:2538–2546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Martinez-Gomez NC, Downs DM. 2008. ThiC is an [Fe-S] cluster protein that requires AdoMet to generate the 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine moiety in thiamin synthesis. Biochemistry 47:9054–9056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Mehl RA, Begley TP. 2002. Synthesis of 32P-labeled intermediates on the purine biosynthetic pathway. J. Labelled Comp. Radiopharm. 45:1097–1102 [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Meyer E, Leonard NJ, Bhat B, Stubbe J, Smith JM. 1992. Purification and characterization of the purE, purK, and purC gene products: identification of a previously unrecognized energy requirement in the purine biosynthetic pathway. Biochemistry 31:5022–5032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Petersen L, Enos-Berlage J, Downs DM. 1996. Genetic analysis of metabolic crosstalk and its impact on thiamine synthesis in Salmonella typhimurium. Genetics 143:37–44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Petersen LA, Downs DM. 1997. Identification and characterization of an operon in Salmonella typhimurium involved in thiamine biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 179:4894–4900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ramos I, Downs DM. 2003. Anthranilate synthase can generate sufficient phosphoribosyl amine for thiamine synthesis in Salmonella enterica. J. Bacteriol. 185:5125–5132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ramos I, Vivas EI, Downs DM. 2008. Mutations in the tryptophan operon allow PurF-independent thiamine synthesis by altering flux in vivo. J. Bacteriol. 190:815–822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Raschke M, et al. 2007. Vitamin B1 biosynthesis in plants requires the essential iron-sulfur cluster protein, THIC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:19637–19642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Roach PL. 2011. Radicals from S-adenosylmethionine and their application to biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 15:267–275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Roberts GP. 1978. Isolation and characterization of informational suppressors in Salmonella typhimurium. University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Rolfes RJ, Zalkin H. 1988. Escherichia coli gene purR encoding a repressor protein for purine nucleotide synthesis. Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and interaction with the purF operator. J. Biol. Chem. 263:19653–19661 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Rolfes RJ, Zalkin H. 1988. Regulation of Escherichia coli purF. Mutations that define the promoter, operator, and purine repressor gene. J. Biol. Chem. 263:19649–19652 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Salati LM, Gross CJ, Henderson LM, Savaiano DA. 1984. Absorption and metabolism of adenine, adenosine-5′-monophosphate, adenosine and hypoxanthine by the isolated vascularly perfused rat small intestine. J. Nutr. 114:753–760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Schmieger H. 1972. Phage P22-mutants with increased or decreased transduction abilities. Mol. Gen. Genet. 119:75–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Tranchimand S, Starks CM, Mathews II, Hockings SC, Kappock TJ. 2011. Treponema denticola PurE is a bacterial AIR carboxylase. Biochemistry 50:4623–4637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Way JC, Davis MA, Morisato D, Roberts DE, Kleckner N. 1984. New Tn10 derivatives for transposon mutagenesis and for construction of lacZ operon fusions by transposition. Gene 32:369–379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Webb E, Downs D. 1997. Characterization of thiL, encoding thiamin-monophosphate kinase, in Salmonella typhimurium. J. Biol. Chem. 272:15702–15707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Zhou G, Smith JL, Zalkin H. 1994. Binding of purine nucleotides to two regulatory sites results in synergistic feedback inhibition of glutamine 5-phosphoribosylpyrophosphate amidotransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 269:6784–6789 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES