Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2012 Nov;194(22):6233–6239. doi: 10.1128/JB.01223-12

Differential Control of the Rate of 5′-End-Dependent mRNA Degradation in Escherichia coli

Daniel J Luciano 1, Monica P Hui 1, Atilio Deana 1,*, Patricia L Foley 1, Kevin J Belasco 1, Joel G Belasco 1,
PMCID: PMC3486407  PMID: 22984254

Abstract

Many Escherichia coli mRNAs are degraded by a 5′-end-dependent mechanism in which RppH-catalyzed conversion of the 5′-terminal triphosphate to a monophosphate triggers rapid endonucleolytic cleavage by RNase E. However, little is understood about what governs the decay rates of these transcripts. We investigated the decay of three such messages—rpsT P1, yfcZ, and ydfG—to characterize the rate-determining step in their degradation. The steady-state ratio of monophosphorylated to triphosphorylated rpsT P1 and yfcZ mRNA indicates that their decay rate is limited by cleavage of the monophosphorylated intermediate, making RNase E critical for their rapid turnover. Conversely, the decay rate of ydfG is limited by generation of the monophosphorylated intermediate; therefore, either RNase E or its less abundant paralog RNase G is sufficient for rapid ydfG degradation. Although all three transcripts are stabilized when RppH is absent, overproducing RppH does not accelerate their decay, nor does RppH overproduction appear to influence the longevity of most other messages that it targets. The failure of excess RppH to hasten rpsT P1 and yfcZ degradation despite increasing the percentage of each that is monophosphorylated is consistent with the observation that pyrophosphate removal is not the rate-limiting step in their decay. In contrast, neither the ydfG decay rate nor the fraction of ydfG transcripts that are monophosphorylated increases when the cellular concentration of RppH is raised, suggesting that, for some RppH targets, the rate of formation of the monophosphorylated intermediate is limited by an ancillary factor or by a step that precedes pyrophosphate removal.

INTRODUCTION

An important mechanism for controlling gene expression in all organisms is the rate at which mRNA is degraded, which enables them to modulate cellular mRNA concentrations and adapt rapidly to environmental changes. The longevities of distinct transcripts within the same cell can differ substantially. For example, although the average half-life of mRNA in Escherichia coli is about 6 min (6, 29), lifetimes can vary by up to 2 orders of magnitude, with commensurate effects on protein synthesis.

E. coli cells appear to lack a 5′ exoribonuclease, and 3′ exonucleolytic degradation is inhibited by the stem-loop structures typically present at mRNA 3′ ends. Consequently, endonucleolytic cleavage is thought to be a critical early event in mRNA turnover in that organism (5). The most important endonuclease for degrading mRNA in E. coli is RNase E, whose inactivation stabilizes most messages (3, 2426, 30). This enzyme has low cleavage site specificity, preferring to cut in single-stranded regions that are AU rich (23). The resulting 5′ and 3′ fragments are then rapidly degraded to mononucleotides by a combination of further endonucleolytic cleavage and 3′ exonucleolytic digestion (5).

RNase E and its less abundant paralog RNase G can gain access to cleavage sites in mRNA either directly or by a 5′-end-dependent mechanism (5). The direct-access pathway allows cleavage of triphosphorylated primary transcripts, whereas 5′-end-dependent access requires prior conversion of the 5′-terminal triphosphate to a monophosphate by the RNA pyrophosphohydrolase RppH (11, 13). The monophosphorylated 5′ end thereby generated can bind in a discrete pocket on the surface of RNase E and accelerate internal RNA cleavage by the catalytic active site of the same enzyme (10, 21). RppH targets hundreds of E. coli transcripts, as evidenced by their increased longevity and concentration in cells devoid of RppH activity (13). However, apart from the protective effect of a 5′-terminal stem-loop (1, 4, 8, 9, 15), which inhibits both pyrophosphate removal by RppH and 5′-monophosphate-assisted cleavage by RNase E (13, 21), little is understood about the features of mRNAs that govern their susceptibility to rapid degradation by the 5′-end-dependent pathway.

To better understand the role that RppH plays in controlling mRNA lifetimes, we compared the rates of 5′ pyrophosphate removal and subsequent RNase E cleavage for three representative E. coli transcripts that are degraded by a 5′-end-dependent mechanism. In addition, we examined whether an excess of RppH affects the concentration, phosphorylation state, and half-life of the mRNAs that it targets. Our data indicate that either pyrophosphate removal or RNase E cleavage can determine the rate of 5′-end-dependent degradation and suggest that the rate at which RppH converts the 5′-terminal triphosphate to a monophosphate may sometimes be limited by a prior event or another cellular factor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and plasmids.

Measurements of protein levels and of mRNA lifetimes and 5′ phosphorylation states were performed in E. coli K-12 strain BW25113 and its isogenic derivatives JW2798Δkan, which contains an in-frame deletion of the rppH coding region, and JW3216Δkan, which contains an in-frame deletion of the rng coding region (2, 13). Alternatively, the measurements were performed in SK9714 (rneΔ1018::bla) containing either pRne-SG1 (wild-type RNase E) or pRne-SG4 (RNase E-R169Q) (16). The effect of RNase E inactivation in the presence or absence of RNase G was examined in isogenic derivatives of BW25113 that contained a wild-type or temperature-sensitive rne allele (rne-1, also known as ams-1) (22) and an intact or deleted rng gene.

The chromosomal rppH gene of BW25113 was tagged to encode an RppH derivative (RppH-FH) bearing carboxy-terminal FLAG and hexahistidine tags (DYKDDDDKGHHHHHH) by allelic exchange, as described previously (14) but with the following modifications. The inserted DNA segment, along with ∼0.75 kb of chromosomal DNA upstream and downstream of the rppH termination codon, was amplified by SOE (splicing by overlapping extension)-PCR, cloned into plasmid pRE112, and introduced into BW25113 by conjugation with E. coli strain S17-1λ. Single recombinants were selected on minimal morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) agar containing glucose (0.2%) and chloramphenicol (20 μg/ml), and double recombinants were then selected on LB agar containing 5% sucrose but no sodium chloride and verified by PCR and immunoblotting.

Plasmid pPlacRppH, which encodes wild-type RppH synthesized under the control of an isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible lacUV5 promoter, has been described previously (13). Plasmid pPlacRppH-FH was constructed from pPlacRppH to add tandem FLAG and hexahistidine tags (DYKDDDDKGHHHHHH) to the carboxyl terminus of plasmid-encoded RppH. Plasmid pOmpAΔ104Q-F was constructed from pOmpAΔ104Q (1) to add a FLAG tag at the carboxyl terminus of OmpA. Plasmids pYdfG1 and pYfcZ1 were constructed by cloning the ydfG or yfcZ gene between the EcoRI and PstI sites of plasmid pBR322fd, a derivative of pBR322 in which a 0.35-kb HindIII fragment of pLBU1 containing the bacteriophage fd terminator (17) had been inserted at the HindIII site to block transcription of the bla gene from promoters upstream of its natural promoter without impairing transcription of the tet gene.

Measurement of RNA lifetimes.

To examine the effect of RppH on rates of mRNA degradation, E. coli cells were grown to mid-log phase at 37°C in MOPS medium containing glucose (0.2%) and IPTG (10 μM, which induced RppH overproduction in cells containing pPlacRppH), and total cellular RNA was extracted at time intervals after inhibiting transcription with rifampin (0.2 mg/ml). To determine the effect of an RNase E 5′ sensor defect on mRNA decay, the cells were instead grown in LB medium. To examine the consequences of RNase E inactivation in either the presence or absence of RNase G, cells that contained a wild-type or temperature-sensitive rne allele and had been growing exponentially at 30°C in MOPS-glucose medium were shifted to 44°C 10 min before rifampin addition. For quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis, cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of DNase I-treated (Ambion) total RNA by using SuperScript III (Invitrogen), along with 0.2 μg of random-hexamer primers (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer's instructions. qPCR was carried out in triplicate in a volume of 25 μl, which included 12.5 μl of SYBR green supermix (Roche). After heating for 10 min at 95°C, the qPCR mixtures were subjected to 40 amplification cycles (15 s at 95°C, 1 min at 55°C). The initial concentration of each cDNA was determined by fitting the data to a two-parameter MAK2 model (7, 27), using an offset of four cycles after the second derivative maximum to approximate the first derivative maximum, and then normalized to that of 16S rRNA. mRNA half-lives were calculated by linear regression analysis of a semilogarithmic plot of mRNA concentration versus time after rifampin addition.

For Northern blot analysis, equal amounts of total RNA (10 μg) from cells that contained plasmid pYdfG1 or pYfcZ1 and had been treated with rifampin for various periods of time were subjected to gel electrophoresis on either polyacrylamide (4% to 6%) containing 8 M urea or 1.0% agarose containing 2.4% formaldehyde. RNA was transferred to a Hybond-XL membrane (GE Healthcare) by electroblotting (polyacrylamide gels) or overnight capillary transfer (agarose gels). The blots were UV cross-linked and probed with a 5′-radiolabeled oligonucleotide complementary to either rpsT, ydfG, or yfcZ mRNA (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Radioactive bands were visualized with a Storm 820 PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics), and the band intensities were quantified by using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics). mRNA half-lives were calculated by linear regression analysis.

Kinetic modeling of RppH-dependent mRNA degradation via a two-step mechanism (triP→monoP→decay products) (see below for definitions of terms) was accomplished by numerical integration. The only variables were kPP and kE, whose values were constrained by the requirement that their ratio equal the observed steady-state ratio of monophosphorylated to triphosphorylated mRNA. These two rate constants include not only the hydrolytic events themselves, but also any preliminary steps in the formation or breakdown of the monophosphorylated decay intermediate, such as steps that may precede the binding of triphosphorylated mRNA to RppH (components of kPP) and the dissociation of the monophosphorylated intermediate from RppH (components of kE). Theoretical half-lives were calculated by linear regression analysis of the mRNA remaining (triP plus monoP) at 7 to 8 evenly spaced time intervals from the moment of transcription inhibition until ∼90% of the mRNA had been degraded.

5′-end mapping.

The 5′ ends of ydfG and yfcZ mRNA were mapped by rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). To convert all 5′ ends to ligatable monophosphates, 5 μg of total E. coli RNA was treated with 2 units of tobacco acid pyrophosphatase (TAP) (Epicentre Biotechnologies) for 2 h at 37°C. Following phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, 2.5 μg of the TAP-treated RNA was ligated to 1.25 μg of an RNA oligonucleotide (RLM-RNA) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) with T4 RNA ligase (Epicentre Biotechnologies), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The RNA was converted to cDNA by using SuperScript III (Invitrogen) and either ydfG rev or yfcZ rev as a primer (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The cDNA was then PCR amplified by using either RACE+ or RACEnest as a forward primer and ydfG rev or yfcZ rev as a reverse primer, and the PCR products were gel purified and sequenced to identify the mRNA 5′ end.

PABLO analysis.

To examine the effect of RppH on the 5′ phosphorylation state of mRNA, total cellular RNA was extracted from E. coli cells that had been grown to mid-log phase at 37°C in MOPS medium containing glucose (0.2%) and IPTG (10 μM, which induced RppH overproduction in cells containing pPlacRppH). The phosphorylation states of individual E. coli transcripts were determined by PABLO analysis, i.e., splinted ligation of monophosphorylated RNA to a 32-nucleotide (nt) DNA oligonucleotide (X32) in the presence of a bridging DNA oligonucleotide specific for a single RNA 5′ end (YrpsT P1, YyfcZ, or YydfG), as previously described (12) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Detection of yfcZ and ydfG mRNA was enhanced by examining total RNA extracted from cells that contained plasmid pYfcZ1 or pYdfG1, respectively. To improve the electrophoretic separation of the ligated and unligated reaction products, 400 pmol of a transcript-specific 10-23 DNAzyme (28) was included in each PABLO reaction to generate a shorter 5′-terminal fragment by site-specific cleavage within codon 12 (rpsT) or 21 (yfcZ and ydfG) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The reaction products were detected by Northern blot analysis with transcript-specific probes. To calculate the percentage of each transcript that was monophosphorylated, PABLO ligation yields were divided by the ligation yield measured for the same transcript after treating total RNA with 2 units of TAP for 2 h at 37°C to convert all 5′ ends to monophosphates. All of the PABLO measurements were performed three or more times, and a mean and standard deviation were calculated.

Microarray analysis.

Total cellular RNA was extracted in triplicate from cultures of either BW25113 or JW2798Δkan growing exponentially at 37°C in MOPS medium containing glucose (0.2%). cDNA was prepared by random-hexamer-primed reverse transcription with SuperScript II (Invitrogen), fragmented with DNase I (GE Biosciences), biotin labeled with the GeneChip DNA-labeling reagent (Affymetrix) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Promega), and used to probe E. coli Genome 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix). The microarrays were scanned with an Affymetrix GeneChip Scanner 3000, and the raw data were scaled and quantified with Affymetrix GCOS software. Triplicate values were averaged, and significant probesets were calculated by t test. A P value of < 0.01 was used as a cutoff for statistical significance.

Subcellular fractionation and immunoblotting.

Subcellular fractionation of E. coli extracts was performed as described previously (32). For immunoblot analysis, cellular proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (15% polyacrylamide) and transferred to a Hybond-P membrane (GE Healthcare) by electroblotting. Following incubation with either a polyclonal antiserum or a monoclonal antibody, and then with goat anti-rabbit IgG or goat anti-mouse IgG (Bio-Rad), protein bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Bio-Rad). Serial dilution of cellular protein prior to immunoblot analysis was achieved by diluting cell extracts that contained RppH with a cell extract that did not contain RppH to ensure that equal amounts of total protein were loaded in each lane.

Polyclonal rabbit anti-RppH antibodies (Covance; raised against purified RppH bearing an amino-terminal hexahistidine tag) and monoclonal anti-DnaK (Assay Designs), anti-FLAG (Sigma), and anti-His (Clontech) antibodies were used at dilutions of 1:1,000, 1:2,000, 1:5,000, and 1:5,000, respectively.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Effect of RppH overproduction on mRNA concentrations.

Previously, we screened for RppH targets in E. coli by using microarray analysis to compare transcript levels in cells that lacked the chromosomal rppH gene and instead contained a multicopy plasmid encoding either wild-type RppH or a catalytically inactive RppH mutant (RppH-E53A) under the control of a heterologous promoter and 5′ untranslated region (13). In this manner, we identified hundreds of messages whose concentrations were significantly elevated in cells lacking RppH activity. However, those experiments may have exaggerated the influence of RppH in E. coli if its cellular concentration was unnaturally high due to production from a multicopy plasmid.

To ascertain by how much RppH had been overproduced in those experiments, we compared its concentration in cells that contained either a single chromosomal copy of the rppH gene or the multicopy rppH plasmid. To facilitate detection, both copies of the gene were carboxy-terminally tagged with a FLAG epitope and six histidine residues. The relative abundance of RppH was then estimated by immunoblot analysis of unfractionated cell extracts (Fig. 1A). These experiments showed that the concentration of RppH in E. coli increases ∼500-fold when overproduced from the multicopy rppH plasmid. Furthermore, about half of the untagged RppH in cells containing the original multicopy plasmid was soluble and therefore potentially functional, as judged by separating a cell extract into soluble and insoluble fractions (Fig. 1B).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

RppH overproduction in E. coli. (A) Relative concentration of RppH in wild-type and overproducing cells. Protein extracts from cells that contained either a single chromosomal copy of the epitope-tagged rppH gene (RppH-FH) or, in addition, a multicopy plasmid encoding epitope-tagged RppH were serially diluted with a protein extract from cells that lacked RppH-FH, and their RppH-FH content was analyzed by immunoblotting. (B) Solubility of RppH overproduced in E. coli. A protein extract from cells that overproduced untagged RppH from a multicopy plasmid (T) was separated by centrifugation into soluble (S) and insoluble (P) fractions, and the fractions were examined by immunoblot analysis with polyclonal anti-RppH antibodies. As controls, the immunoblots were also probed for the cytoplasmic protein DnaK (soluble) or a FLAG-tagged derivative of the outer membrane protein OmpA (insoluble).

The realization that RppH was present at quite a high concentration in the prior microarray study prompted us to conduct a new microarray experiment in which transcript levels were compared in E. coli cells that contained wild-type RppH at its normal concentration (plasmid-free cells bearing a single, untagged chromosomal copy of the rppH gene) or no RppH at all (plasmid-free cells from which the rppH gene had been deleted). Despite the large difference in RppH concentrations, the RppH-sensitive messages identified in this manner were almost identical to those identified previously, as was the magnitude of the effect of RppH on their abundance (Fig. 2; see Table S2 in the supplemental material). These findings indicate that neither the number of E. coli mRNAs targeted by RppH nor the degree to which they are downregulated is significantly affected by RppH overproduction, raising the possibility that their decay rates are not limited by the cellular concentration of RppH.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Effect of RppH overproduction on the concentration of its targets. E. coli mRNAs downregulated by RppH were identified by using microarray analysis to compare the concentration in cells that either contained or lacked the chromosomal rppH gene (ΔrppH/WT) or that lacked the chromosomal rppH gene and instead contained a multicopy plasmid encoding wild-type RppH or catalytically inactive RppH-E53A (Excess E53A/Excess WT) (13). The effect of RppH, measured in triplicate at either a normal or an elevated protein concentration, was calculated for 462 mRNAs and graphed, using a P value of <0.01 as a threshold for significance, and the best-fit line was calculated by linear regression (slope = 0.88). Messages whose half-lives were subsequently compared in wild-type and RppH-overproducing cells are represented by white (rpsT, yfcZ, and ydfG) or gray (csrB, hisD, and malP) data points.

Effect of RppH overproduction on mRNA lifetimes.

To test directly whether the degradation of these messages is insensitive to increasing the concentration of RppH, we compared the half-lives of three monocistronic RppH targets in isogenic E. coli strains that contained either a normal amount of RppH (untagged), an elevated concentration of RppH (untagged), or no RppH whatsoever. The cells were grown to mid-log phase, rifampin was added to block transcription initiation, and total cellular RNA was extracted at time intervals and analyzed by qRT-PCR with primers specific for the rpsT P1 transcript, which encodes ribosomal protein S20; ydfG mRNA, which encodes an NADP+-dependent 3-hydroxy acid dehydrogenase; yfcZ mRNA, which encodes a conserved protein of unknown function; and 16S rRNA (a stable internal standard). As expected, the half-lives of all three mRNAs were substantially (∼5-fold) longer in cells lacking RppH (Fig. 3; see Table S3 in the supplemental material). However, a large increase in the cellular concentration of RppH had almost no effect on the decay rates of these transcripts.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Effect of RppH overproduction on mRNA decay rates, as determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Total RNA was extracted at time intervals after rifampin addition to wild-type, ΔrppH, and RppH-overproducing E. coli cells, and equal amounts were analyzed by qRT-PCR with primers specific for the rpsT P1, yfcZ, or ydfG transcript or for 16S rRNA (a stable internal standard). The mRNA levels in each sample were calculated by MAK2 analysis (7, 27), normalized to the concentration of 16S rRNA, and plotted as a function of time. Each point is the average of three measurements.

To corroborate these observations, we measured the half-lives of the same three messages in wild-type and RppH-overproducing cells by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 4A). In each case, the calculated rate of decay was similar to that measured by quantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 4B; see Table S3 in the supplemental material), confirming that a substantial increase in the concentration of RppH does not significantly accelerate their degradation by the 5′-end-dependent pathway.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Effect of RppH overproduction on mRNA decay rates, as determined by Northern blotting. (A) Northern blot analysis of the decay of rpsT, yfcZ, and ydfG mRNA. E. coli cells containing normal or elevated levels of RppH were transformed with a multicopy plasmid bearing the ydfG or yfcZ gene, total RNA was extracted at time intervals after rifampin addition, and equal amounts were analyzed by Northern blotting with probes complementary to the coding region of yfcZ or ydfG mRNA or to a region of the rpsT 5′ UTR that allowed detection of mRNA transcribed from either the P1 promoter or a downstream promoter (P2). (B) mRNA half-lives in cells containing normal or elevated levels of RppH, as determined by quantitative RT-PCR or Northern blotting. The error bars represent standard deviations.

In addition, we tested three transcripts (csrB, hisD, and malP) for which the two microarray studies had come to very different conclusions about the degree to which RppH influences their abundance (Fig. 2). For none of them did increasing the concentration of RppH diminish transcript stability, as measured by quantitative RT-PCR (see Table S4 in the supplemental material). By extrapolation, it seems likely that the decay of most of the other outliers in Fig. 2 is not significantly accelerated by RppH overproduction. Neither does its overproduction at this level impede cell growth (data not shown).

Effect of RppH overproduction on 5′ phosphorylation states.

In principle, the failure of an elevated RppH concentration to accelerate 5′-end-dependent degradation could be explained if the rate of this process is limited, not by pyrophosphate removal, but by subsequent RNase E cleavage. The relative rates of these two steps can be determined from the steady-state ratio of monophosphorylated to triphosphorylated RNA, which should equal the ratio of the rate constants for the formation and breakdown of the monophosphorylated decay intermediate, including any preliminary or intermediate steps in these events: monoP/triP = kPP/kE, where monoP is the steady-state concentration of the full-length monophosphorylated intermediate, triP is the steady-state concentration of its triphosphorylated precursor, and kPP and kE are the rate constants for pyrophosphate removal and subsequent RNase E cleavage, respectively. Consequently, this ratio can be used to ascertain which of these two steps governs the rate of 5′-end-dependent mRNA degradation.

To examine the phosphorylation state of the rpsT P1, yfcZ, and ydfG transcripts, their 5′ termini were first identified by RNA ligase-mediated rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RLM-RACE). The ratio of monophosphorylated to triphosphorylated 5′ ends was then determined for each of these transcripts by PABLO, a splinted ligation assay for detecting and quantifying 5′ termini that are monophosphorylated (12). This assay takes advantage of the ability of T4 DNA ligase to covalently join a DNA oligonucleotide to the 5′ end of a monophosphorylated RNA, but not a triphosphorylated RNA, when the two are juxtaposed by simultaneous base pairing to a bridging DNA oligonucleotide. The ligation product and its unligated progenitor are then separated by gel electrophoresis and quantified by Northern blotting. As a normalization control, the same RNAs are analyzed by PABLO after treatment with TAP to convert their 5′ ends entirely to ligatable monophosphates. The percentage of 5′ ends that are monophosphorylated in E. coli can then be calculated from the ratio of the ligation yields before and after TAP treatment.

In wild-type cells, the fraction of transcripts that were monophosphorylated differed significantly among the three mRNAs, ranging from 17% to 60% (Fig. 5; see Table S5 in the supplemental material). Predictably, this value fell almost to zero in the absence of RppH. For ydfG, the ratio of monophosphorylated to triphosphorylated full-length transcripts was 1/5 (17%/83%), indicating that pyrophosphate removal from the primary transcript is much slower than RNase E cleavage of the monophosphorylated intermediate, i.e., that the decay rate of ydfG mRNA is controlled primarily by the rate at which the triphosphorylated transcript is converted to its monophosphorylated counterpart (kPP). In contrast, the ratio was 3/2 for the rpsT P1 and yfcZ transcripts (both 60% monophosphorylated), evidence that pyrophosphate removal from these mRNAs is ordinarily somewhat faster than subsequent RNase E cleavage and that the latter step (kE) is principally responsible for limiting their rate of decay.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Effect of RppH overproduction on the phosphorylation state of mRNA. (A) PABLO analysis of the 5′ phosphorylation state of the rpsT P1, yfcZ, and ydfG transcripts. Total RNA was extracted from E. coli cells that contained a normal or elevated level of RppH or no RppH whatsoever, and equal amounts were subjected to PABLO analysis with oligonucleotides specific for the rpsT P1, yfcZ, or ydfG transcript. A TAP-treated RNA sample was analyzed in parallel so that the ligation yields of fully monophosphorylated RNA could be compared. In each case, the electrophoretic resolution of the ligated and unligated reaction products was enhanced by site-specific RNA cleavage with a 10-23 DNAzyme (28). The residual levels of monophosphorylated rpsT P1, yfcZ, and ydfG mRNA in the absence of RppH (≤4% of the total) may result from infrequent transcription initiation with AMP instead of ATP or from another, minor RNA pyrophosphohydrolase whose activity is too low to be of consequence. (B) mRNA phosphorylation states in cells containing normal or elevated levels of RppH, as determined by PABLO. The error bars represent the standard deviations of three or more independent measurements.

We next determined whether an excess of RppH affects the relative rates of these two steps. Although overproducing RppH did not significantly affect the half-life of rpsT P1 or yfcZ (Fig. 4B; see Table S3 in the supplemental material), it raised the percentage of those transcripts that were monophosphorylated (Fig. 5; see Table S5 in the supplemental material), presumably by increasing kPP. As a result, the ratio of monophosphorylated to triphosphorylated mRNA increased 3- to 7-fold. The failure of elevated RppH levels to noticeably accelerate the decay of those transcripts is consistent with the observation in wild-type cells that the rate constant for pyrophosphate removal from the 5′ end of rpsT P1 and yfcZ already exceeds that for degradation of the resulting monophosphorylated intermediate; therefore, making pyrophosphate removal even faster would not be expected to hasten decay by more than 19%, as determined by kinetic modeling. Such a meager effect would be difficult to detect.

Interestingly, although PABLO analysis suggests that the half-life of ydfG mRNA is normally governed by the rate of pyrophosphate removal from the triphosphorylated primary transcript, increasing the cellular concentration of RppH did not affect the percentage of full-length ydfG transcripts that were monophosphorylated (Fig. 5; see Table S5 in the supplemental material) or the rate of ydfG degradation (Fig. 4B; see Table S3 in the supplemental material). Nevertheless, both decreased markedly when RppH was absent. These observations indicate that something other than RppH ordinarily limits the rate of production of the monophosphorylated ydfG intermediate and, therefore, the overall rate of ydfG mRNA decay. For example, efficient pyrophosphate removal from triphosphorylated ydfG may require not only RppH but also an ancillary protein whose concentration is limiting. Alternatively, conversion of the 5′ triphosphate of ydfG to a monophosphate may be a two-step process in which pyrophosphate removal by RppH is triggered by a prior, RppH-independent event that is rate determining. In principle, such a triggering event might involve a change in the conformation of the ydfG transcript or in its interaction with ribosomes or some other cellular factor so as to make the 5′ terminus more accessible to RppH. In either case, increasing the concentration of RppH would not be expected to affect either the half-life of ydfG mRNA or the percentage of ydfG transcripts that are monophosphorylated, yet the absence of RppH in ΔrppH cells would block formation of the monophosphorylated intermediate and force degradation to proceed by a slower, 5′-end-independent mechanism.

Roles of RNase E and RNase G in degrading monophosphorylated intermediates.

Finally, to determine whether RNase E degrades the monophosphorylated rpsT P1, ydfG, and yfcZ decay intermediates generated by RppH, we examined the decay of these three messages in cells that contained a mutant form of RNase E (RNase E-R169Q [16]) unable to recognize monophosphorylated 5′ ends. As expected, the half-lives of the rpsT P1 and yfcZ transcripts increased substantially (5- to 6-fold); however, the decay rate of ydfG was unchanged (Fig. 6A; see Table S6 in the supplemental material). The lifetime of ydfG mRNA also did not increase significantly upon thermal inactivation of a temperature-sensitive form of RNase E (RNase E-G66S [22]) or in the absence of RNase G, an RNase E paralog whose specificity is similar to that of RNase E but whose concentration in E. coli is much lower (1820, 31). However, when RNase E was inactivated in cells lacking RNase G, the lifetime of ydfG mRNA was substantially prolonged (Fig. 6B; see Table S7 in the supplemental material). Thus, although RNase E is necessary for rapid degradation of monophosphorylated rpsT P1 and yfcZ mRNA, either RNase E or RNase G is sufficient to degrade the monophosphorylated ydfG intermediate at an adequate rate. These results are consistent with the conclusion, based on PABLO analysis, that the decay rates of rpsT P1 and yfcZ mRNA are limited by degradative events subsequent to pyrophosphate removal (i.e., by RNase E cleavage), whereas the decay rate of ydfG mRNA is not. In the absence of RNase E, E. coli appears to contain sufficient RNase G to degrade the monophosphorylated ydfG intermediate without a significant change in the overall rate of ydfG decay, which is governed by the rate of formation of that intermediate and not by its rate of breakdown. In contrast, the decay rates of the rpsT P1 and yfcZ transcripts are governed by cleavage of the monophosphorylated intermediate and are therefore dependent on RNase E availability.

Fig 6.

Fig 6

Roles of RNase E and RNase G in RppH-dependent mRNA decay. (A) Effect of an RNase E 5′ sensor defect on the degradation of rpsT P1, yfcZ, and ydfG mRNA. Total RNA was extracted at time intervals after rifampin addition to E. coli cells containing wild-type RNase E or RNase E-R169Q and analyzed by qRT-PCR as in Fig. 3. (B) Combined effect of RNase E and RNase G on the degradation of ydfG mRNA. (Left) Decay of ydfG mRNA in E. coli cells containing either wild-type RNase E or a temperature-sensitive RNase E mutant (rne-1, also known as ams-1, encoding RNase E-G66S) after a temperature shift from 30°C to 44°C. (Center) Decay of ydfG mRNA at 37°C in E. coli cells containing or lacking RNase G (Δrng). (Right) Decay of ydfG mRNA in a double mutant containing both a temperature-sensitive rne allele and a Δrng allele after shifting the temperature to 44°C. In each case, ydfG mRNA levels were quantified by qRT-PCR as in Fig. 3.

Conclusions.

These findings show that the rate of RppH-dependent RNA degradation in E. coli can be limited either by pyrophosphate removal or by subsequent RNase E cleavage. When pyrophosphate removal is rate determining, RNase G can be an effective substitute for RNase E in subsequent cleavage events despite its low abundance, whereas RNase E is critical for rapid decay when those cleavage events are rate determining. Furthermore, the influence of RppH on the phosphorylation state of E. coli transcripts degraded by a 5′-end-dependent mechanism indicates that they can be categorized into at least two groups: those, like rpsT P1 and yfcZ, for which the concentration of RppH limits the rate of pyrophosphate removal and those, like ydfG, for which it does not. The difference between the two groups of mRNAs may be quantitative rather than qualitative; for example, an RppH-independent event might trigger pyrophosphate removal from all transcripts that are targeted by RppH but might be rate limiting only for the latter group. Among the former group of transcripts, a triggering event that is just a few times faster than subsequent RppH-catalyzed pyrophosphate removal could help to explain why an ∼250-fold increase in the concentration of soluble RppH increases the ratio of monophosphorylated to triphosphorylated rpsT P1 and yfcZ mRNA by only a factor of 3 to 7.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Saori Yamaguchi, Andrew Darwin, and George Mackie for helpful advice and materials.

These studies were supported by fellowships to D.J.L. (T32AI007180), M.P.H. (F32GM101962), and P.L.F. (T32AI007180) and a research grant to J.G.B. (R01GM035769) from the National Institutes of Health.

The content of this publication is solely our responsibility and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 14 September 2012

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jb.asm.org/.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Arnold TE, Yu J, Belasco JG. 1998. mRNA stabilization by the ompA 5′ untranslated region: two protective elements hinder distinct pathways for mRNA degradation. RNA 4:319–330 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Baba T, et al. 2006. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2:2006.0008 doi:10.1038/msb4100050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Babitzke P, Kushner SR. 1991. The Ams (altered mRNA stability) protein and ribonuclease E are encoded by the same structural gene of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88:1–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Baker KE, Mackie GA. 2003. Ectopic RNase E sites promote bypass of 5′-end-dependent mRNA decay in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 47:75–88 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Belasco JG. 2010. All things must pass: contrasts and commonalities in eukaryotic and bacterial mRNA decay. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:467–478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bernstein JA, Khodursky AB, Lin PH, Lin-Chao S, Cohen SN. 2002. Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:9697–9702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Boggy GJ, Woolf PJ. 2010. A mechanistic model of PCR for accurate quantification of quantitative PCR data. PLoS One 5:e12355 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bouvet P, Belasco JG. 1992. Control of RNase E-mediated RNA degradation by 5′-terminal base pairing in E. coli. Nature 360:488–491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Bricker AL, Belasco JG. 1999. Importance of a 5′ stem-loop for longevity of papA mRNA in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 181:3587–3590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Callaghan AJ, et al. 2005. Structure of Escherichia coli RNase E catalytic domain and implications for RNA turnover. Nature 437:1187–1191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Celesnik H, Deana A, Belasco JG. 2007. Initiation of RNA decay in Escherichia coli by 5′ pyrophosphate removal. Mol. Cell 27:79–90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Celesnik H, Deana A, Belasco JG. 2008. PABLO analysis of RNA 5′-phosphorylation state and 5′-end mapping. Methods Enzymol. 447:83–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Deana A, Celesnik H, Belasco JG. 2008. The bacterial enzyme RppH triggers messenger RNA degradation by 5′ pyrophosphate removal. Nature 451:355–358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Edwards RA, Keller LH, Schifferli DM. 1998. Improved allelic exchange vectors and their use to analyze 987P fimbria gene expression. Gene 207:149–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Emory SA, Bouvet P, Belasco JG. 1992. A 5′-terminal stem-loop structure can stabilize mRNA in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 6:135–148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Garrey SM, Mackie GA. 2011. Roles of the 5′-phosphate sensor domain in RNase E. Mol. Microbiol. 80:1613–1624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Gentz R, Langner A, Chang AC, Cohen SN, Bujard H. 1981. Cloning and analysis of strong promoters is made possible by the downstream placement of a RNA termination signal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78:4936–4940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Jiang X, Diwa A, Belasco JG. 2000. Regions of RNase E important for 5′-end-dependent RNA cleavage and autoregulated synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 182:2468–2475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lee K, Bernstein JA, Cohen SN. 2002. RNase G complementation of rne null mutation identifies functional interrelationships with RNase E in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 43:1445–1456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Li Z, Pandit S, Deutscher MP. 1999. RNase G (CafA protein) and RNase E are both required for the 5′ maturation of 16S ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 18:2878–2885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mackie GA. 1998. Ribonuclease E is a 5′-end-dependent endonuclease. Nature 395:720–723 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. McDowall KJ, Hernandez RG, Lin-Chao S, Cohen SN. 1993. The ams-1 and rne-3071 temperature-sensitive mutations in the ams gene are in close proximity to each other and cause substitutions within a domain that resembles a product of the Escherichia coli mre locus. J. Bacteriol. 175:4245–4249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. McDowall KJ, Lin-Chao S, Cohen SN. 1994. A+U content rather than a particular nucleotide order determines the specificity of RNase E cleavage. J. Biol. Chem. 269:10790–10796 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Melefors Ö, von Gabain A. 1991. Genetic studies of cleavage-initiated mRNA decay and processing of ribosomal 9S RNA show that the Escherichia coli ams and rne loci are the same. Mol. Microbiol. 5:857–864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Mudd EA, Krisch HM, Higgins CF. 1990. RNase E, an endoribonuclease, has a general role in the chemical decay of E. coli mRNA: evidence that rne and ams are the same genetic locus. Mol. Microbiol. 4:2127–2135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ono M, Kuwano M. 1979. A conditional lethal mutation in an Escherichia coli strain with a longer chemical lifetime of mRNA. J. Mol. Biol. 129:343–357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ritz C, Spiess AN. 2008. qpcR: an R package for sigmoidal model selection in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. Bioinformatics 24:1549–1551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Santoro SW, Joyce GF. 1997. A general purpose RNA-cleaving DNA enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:4262–4266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Selinger DW, Saxena RM, Cheung KJ, Church GM, Rosenow C. 2003. Global RNA half-life analysis in Escherichia coli reveals positional patterns of transcript degradation. Genome Res. 13:216–223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Taraseviciene L, Miczak A, Apirion D. 1991. The gene specifying RNase E (rne) and a gene affecting mRNA stability (ams) are the same gene. Mol. Microbiol. 5:851–855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Tock MR, Walsh AP, Carroll G, McDowall KJ. 2000. The CafA protein required for the 5′-maturation of 16 S rRNA is a 5′-end-dependent ribonuclease that has context-dependent broad sequence specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 275:8726–8732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Yamaguchi S, Gueguen E, Horstman NK, Darwin AJ. 2010. Membrane association of PspA depends on activation of the phage-shock-protein response in Yersinia enterocolitica. Mol. Microbiol. 78:429–443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES