Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2012 Nov;56(11):6006–6008. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01338-12

Antibiotic Resistance and Substrate Profiles of the Class A Carbapenemase KPC-6

Toni L Lamoureaux 1, Hilary Frase 1, Nuno T Antunes 1, Sergei B Vakulenko 1,
PMCID: PMC3486543  PMID: 22908150

Abstract

The class A carbapenemase KPC-6 produces resistance to a broad range of β-lactam antibiotics. This enzyme hydrolyzes penicillins, the monobactam aztreonam, and carbapenems with similar catalytic efficiencies, ranging from 105 to 106 M−1 s−1. The catalytic efficiencies of KPC-6 against cephems vary to a greater extent, ranging from 103 M−1 s−1 for the cephamycin cefoxitin and the extended-spectrum cephalosporin ceftazidime to 105 to 106 M−1 s−1 for the narrow-spectrum and some of the extended-spectrum cephalosporins.

TEXT

Carbapenems are considered “last resort” antibiotics due to their broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity and resistance to hydrolysis by extended-spectrum β-lactamases (8). The emergence of carbapenem-hydrolyzing β-lactamases (carbapenemases) challenges the efficacy of carbapenem antibiotics, limits the available therapeutic options, and therefore poses a serious health threat to the community (9). Carbapenemases have been identified in all four (A, B, C, and D) classes of β-lactamases. Presently, at least eight subclasses of class A carbapenemases have been reported, including types KPC, NmcA/IMI, SME, GES, FPH, FTU, BIC, and SFC, with the KPC type being the most clinically relevant (2, 6, 9, 13, 14). In 1996, the first reported clinical isolate producing KPC-2 from Klebsiella pneumoniae was identified in North Carolina (16). Currently, 6 KPC variants have been characterized, with 6 more variants annotated in GenBank, and clinical isolates producing KPC are now disseminated worldwide (9; http://www.lahey.org/Studies/other.asp). Despite their utmost clinical importance, only a few KPC variants (KPC-2, KPC-3, and to some extent KPC-4 and KPC-5) have been studied kinetically (1, 1012, 1517). Herein we report the susceptibility profile and first steady-state kinetic characterization of the KPC-6 carbapenemase, a Val240Gly variant of KPC-2, for a panel of β-lactam antibiotics that included penicillins, cephems, carbapenems, and the monobactam aztreonam.

The gene for the mature KPC-6 β-lactamase was custom synthesized (GenScript) and fused to the leader sequence for outer membrane protein A (OmpA). Unique NdeI and HindIII sites were introduced at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the construct. This gene was then cloned into the NdeI and HindIII sites of the pET24a(+) and pHF016 vectors (5). The susceptibility profiles for the β-lactam antibiotics were determined by the microdilution method as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (3). An Escherichia coli JM83 strain harboring the pHF016:KPC-6 plasmid was used for the evaluation of the resistance profile of the KPC-6 β-lactamase, while the same strain harboring the pHF016 vector was used as a control. All antibiotics were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) or US Pharmacopeia (Rockville, MD), with the exception of the carbapenems, which were a generous gift from Robert Bonomo (VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH).

The KPC-6-producing strain exhibited high-level resistance to all penicillins tested (Table 1), with MICs ranging from 512 to 16,384 μg/ml (64- to 2,048-fold above background levels). Similar to the majority of other class A enzymes, KPC-6 also produced high levels of resistance to the narrow-spectrum cephalosporins cephalothin and cefuroxime. MICs of the extended-spectrum cephalosporins cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and cefepime were also significantly elevated. The MICs of the cephamycins cefoxitin and cefmetazole were enhanced the least (a 4-fold increase in MICs above background levels), while the MIC of the monobactam aztreonam was elevated 8,192-fold above the background level, to 256 μg/ml. Although the absolute MIC values for the carbapenem antibiotics imipenem, meropenem, doripenem, and ertapenem were within the range of 1 to 4 μg/ml, they represented a significant (32- to 512-fold) increase above the background levels. The MICs for several tested penicillins against E. coli JM83 expressing KPC-6 were unaffected by the presence of the β-lactamase inhibitors clavulanic acid, tazobactam, or sulbactam, an indication that the enzyme is resistant to inhibition, a trait also observed for the related variant KPC-2 (10). We observed that expression of KPC-6 resulted in an 8-fold increase in the MIC for sulbactam, an indication that the enzyme is capable of hydrolyzing this inhibitor. Hydrolysis of β-lactamase inhibitors has previously been reported for the KPC-2 (10) and KPC-3 (1) carbapenemases.

Table 1.

MIC profile of E. coli JM83 expressing the KPC-6 β-lactamase

Antimicrobial agent MIC (μg/ml)
Controla KPC-6
Benzylpenicillin 16 2,048
Ampicillin 2 4,096
Ampicillin-clavulanic acidb 2 2,048
Ampicillin-tazobactamb 2 2,048
Ampicillin-sulbactamb 1 2,048
Ampicillin-sulbactamc 2 256
Sulbactam 32 256
Amoxicillind 4 >2,048
Amoxicillin-clavulanic acidc 4 32
Clavulanic acid 32 32
Oxacillin 256 16,384
Ticarcillin 4 8,192
Ticarcillin-clavulanic acidb 4 8,192
Piperacillin 2 512
Piperacillin-tazobactamb 2 512
Cephalothin 4 512
Cefuroxime 4 4,096
Ceftazidime 0.125 32
Cefotaxime 0.031 32
Ceftriaxone 0.031 16
Cefepime 0.016 8
Cefoxitin 2 8
Cefmetazole 1 4
Moxalactam 0.125 8
Aztreonam 0.031 256
Imipenem 0.125 4
Meropenem 0.031 2
Ertapenem 0.004 2
Doripenem 0.031 1
a

The control strain was E. coli JM83 with the pHF016 vector.

b

Clavulanic acid was used at a constant concentration of 2 μg/ml. Sulbactam and tazobactam were used at a constant concentration of 4 μg/ml.

c

A 2:1 ratio was maintained for the β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor (clavulanic acid or sulbactam).

d

In Mueller-Hinton II broth, the maximum solubility of amoxicillin is 2,048 μg/ml.

For enzyme purification, E. coli BL21(DE3) harboring the pET24a(+):KPC-6 plasmid was grown at 37°C in LB supplemented with 60 μg/ml kanamycin to an optical density at 600 nm of 1.0. Protein expression was then induced using 0.4 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside, and the culture was incubated at 22°C for an additional 18 h. The periplasmic fraction was isolated as previously described (7) and dialyzed against 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0). The protein was purified using a DEAE anion-exchange column equilibrated with 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0). KPC-6 eluted in the flowthrough fraction and was determined to be ≥95% pure by SDS-PAGE. The enzyme concentration was evaluated spectrophotometrically by using the predicted extinction coefficient for the mature protein (Δε280, 38,690 M−1 cm−1 [http://www.justbio.com/index.php?page=protcalc]). The enzyme was stored at 4°C in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0.

The hydrolysis of β-lactam substrates was evaluated spectrophotometrically at room temperature (5). The final reaction buffer contained 50 mM NaPi (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, and 0.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (for protein stabilization). The parameters kcat and Km were evaluated by nonlinear fitting of the initial velocities, at various concentrations of the substrates, with the Michaelis-Menten equation. In situations in which saturation could not be reached, the value for kcat/Km was determined as previously described (13). The extinction coefficients and wavelengths for substrates used in this study have been previously reported (2, 13).

The steady-state kinetic parameters for KPC-6 are presented in Table 2. For 8 of the 17 substrates used in the kinetic studies, saturation could not be reached. As a result, the values for the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of the enzyme against these substrates were evaluated, while only the lower limits for the kcat and Km values could be determined.

Table 2.

Kinetic parameters for hydrolysis of β-lactam substrates by KPC-6

β-Lactam kcat (s−1)a Km or Ki (μM)a kcat/Km (M−1 s−1)
Ampicillin 280 ± 10 130 ± 10 (2.2 ± 0.2) × 106
Oxacillin 44 ± 1 33 ± 3 (1.3 ± 0.1) × 106
Ticarcillin 13 ± 1 49 ± 5 (2.7 ± 0.3) × 105
Piperacillin 34 ± 2 50 ± 10 (6 ± 1) × 105
Cephalothinb >100 >100 (2.4 ± 0.1) × 106
Cefuroximeb >50 >75 (6.9 ± 0.1) × 105
Ceftazidimeb >0.6 >80 (9.1 ± 0.1) × 103
Cefotaximeb >39 >150 (3.3 ± 0.1) × 105
Ceftriaxoneb >54 >100 (7.5 ± 0.1) × 105
Cefepimeb >4.2 >100 (4.8 ± 0.1) × 104
Cefoxitinb >0.2 >100 (1.9 ± 0.1) × 103
Aztreonamb >150 >500 (3.4 ± 0.1) × 105
Imipenem 18 ± 1 42 ± 4 (4.4 ± 0.4) × 105
Meropenem 3.3 ± 0.1 7 ± 1 (4.5 ± 0.7) × 105
Ertapenem 2.8 ± 0.1 10 ± 1 (2.9 ± 0.3) × 105
Doripenem 0.38 ± 0.01 2.9 ± 0.2 (1.3 ± 0.1) × 105
Nitrocefin 210 ± 10 37 ± 1 (5.6 ± 0.2) × 106
Clavulanic acid 75 ± 8
Sulbactam 600 ± 100
Tazobactam 290 ± 30
a

Values are means ± standard deviations.

b

Saturation could not be reached.

The KPC-6 β-lactamase hydrolyzed penicillins, narrow-spectrum cephalosporins (cephalothin and cefuroxime), and the monobactam aztreonam with catalytic efficiencies of 105 to 106 M−1 s−1. The enzyme also exhibited similar catalytic efficiencies against two extended-spectrum cephalosporins (cefotaxime and ceftriaxone), while the catalytic efficiency against a third, ceftazidime, was 36- and 82-fold lower, respectively. Cefoxitin was the poorest substrate tested; the catalytic efficiency of KPC-6 against this cephamycin antibiotic was 2.3 × 103 M−1 s−1. While KPC-6 had a very similar catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km values from 1.3 × 105 to 4.5 × 105 M−1 s−1) against all four tested carbapenem antibiotics, the kcat and Km values for these substrates showed a broader range of distribution. The kcat value was highest for imipenem (18 ± 1 s−1 [mean ± standard deviation]), while this number was approximately 6-fold lower for meropenem and ertapenem and 47-fold lower for doripenem. Conversely, doripenem had a 3- to 4-fold-higher apparent affinity for the enzyme than meropenem and ertapenem and 14-fold higher than imipenem. Kinetic parameters have been reported for KPC-2 and KPC-3 with two carbapenems, imipenem and meropenem (1, 11, 16). For both antibiotics, the kcat and Km values for KPC-6 were in close agreement (within 2-fold) to those for KPC-2 and KPC-3.

The dissociation constants for the β-lactamase inhibitors clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam (Table 2) were determined using the Dixon method (4). Nitrocefin, as a reporter substrate, was used at concentrations of 50 and 100 μM. Consistent with the MIC data, the β-lactamase inhibitors had low affinity for KPC-6, with dissociation constants for clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam of 75 ± 8 μM, 600 ± 100 μM, and 290 ± 30 μM, respectively. In comparison, higher affinities for the β-lactamase inhibitors have been observed for KPC-2, with dissociation constants for clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam of 11 ± 1 μM, 167 ± 16 μM, and 74 ± 7 μM, respectively (11). The KPC-6 β-lactamase has a Val240Gly substitution in comparison to the KPC-2 enzyme. At least 3 of the KPC variants (KPC-4, -6, and -8) have this substitution, while KPC-9 has a conservative alanine substitution. Compared to KPC-2, our kinetic studies of the KPC-6 carbapenemase indicate that the conservative Val240Gly substitution does not result in an appreciable change in the antibiotic substrate profile or hydrolytic activity of the enzyme.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 20 August 2012

REFERENCES

  • 1. Alba J, Ishii Y, Thomson K, Moland ES, Yamaguchi K. 2005. Kinetics study of KPC-3, a plasmid-encoded class A carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:4760–4762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Antunes NT, Frase H, Toth M, Vakulenko SB. 2012. The class A beta-lactamase FTU-1 is native to Francisella tularensis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:666–671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2009. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 8th ed Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Dixon M. 1953. The determination of enzyme inhibitor constants. Biochem. J. 55:170–171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Frase H, Shi Q, Testero SA, Mobashery S, Vakulenko SB. 2009. Mechanistic basis for the emergence of catalytic competence against carbapenem antibiotics by the GES family of beta-lactamases. J. Biol. Chem. 284:29509–29513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Girlich D, Poirel L, Nordmann P. 2010. Novel ambler class A carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase from a Pseudomonas fluorescens isolate from the Seine River, Paris, France. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:328–332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Neu HC, Heppel LA. 1965. The release of enzymes from Escherichia coli by osmotic shock and during the formation of spheroplasts. J. Biol. Chem. 240:3685–3692 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Nordmann P, Cuzon G, Naas T. 2009. The real threat of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Lancet Infect. Dis. 9:228–236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Nordmann P, Dortet L, Poirel L. 2012. Carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: here is the storm! Trends Mol. Med. 18:263–272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Papp-Wallace KM, et al. 2010. Inhibitor resistance in the KPC-2 beta-lactamase, a preeminent property of this class A beta-lactamase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:890–897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Papp-Wallace KM, et al. 2010. Substrate selectivity and a novel role in inhibitor discrimination by residue 237 in the KPC-2 beta-lactamase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:2867–2877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Papp-Wallace KM, et al. 2010. Elucidating the role of Trp105 in the KPC-2 beta-lactamase. Protein Sci. 19:1714–1727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Toth M, Vakulenko V, Antunes NT, Frase H, Vakulenko SB. 2012. Class A carbapenemase FPH-1 from Francisella philomiragia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:2852–2857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Walther-Rasmussen J, Hoiby N. 2007. Class A carbapenemases. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60:470–482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wolter DJ, et al. 2009. Phenotypic and enzymatic comparative analysis of the novel KPC variant KPC-5 and its evolutionary variants, KPC-2 and KPC-4. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:557–562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Yigit H, et al. 2001. Novel carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase, KPC-1, from a carbapenem-resistant strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1151–1161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Yigit H, et al. 2003. Carbapenem-resistant strain of Klebsiella oxytoca harboring carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase KPC-2. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3881–3889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES