Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2012 Nov;56(11):6054–6056. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01170-12

In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Isavuconazole against Madurella mycetomatis

Wendy Kloezen a,, Jacques F Meis b,c, Ilse Curfs-Breuker b, Ahmed H Fahal d, Wendy W J van de Sande a,
PMCID: PMC3486573  PMID: 22964246

Abstract

Currently, therapy of black-grain mycetoma caused by Madurella mycetomatis consists of extensive debridement of the infected tissue combined with prolonged antifungal therapy with ketoconazole or itraconazole. In the present study, the in vitro activity of the new triazole isavuconazole toward M. mycetomatis was evaluated. Isavuconazole appeared to have high activity against M. mycetomatis, with MICs ranging from ≤0.016 to 0.125 μg/ml. Due to its favorable pharmacokinetics, isavuconazole could be a promising antifungal agent in the treatment of mycetoma.

TEXT

Madurella mycetomatis is the most common causative agent of eumycetoma. This chronic, granulomatous infection is often found in the lower extremities, but it has been reported in other parts of the body as well (4). The infection starts as a small subcutaneous nodule, which gradually progresses into chronic inflammatory lesions with multiple sinuses that excrete a purulent and seropurulent discharge containing black grains. To date, treatment of eumycetoma in areas where eumycetoma is endemic consists of a combination of extensive mutilating surgery or amputation of the infected tissue or limb and prolonged antifungal therapy with ketoconazole or itraconazole (1). However, eumycetoma is associated with high recurrence rates, even after amputation of the affected limb. For M. mycetomatis, the susceptibility to antifungal agents belonging to the classes of polyenes, azoles, allylamines, and echinocandins has been determined (3, 18, 20). Data from these studies suggest that M. mycetomatis is susceptible only to antifungal agents that interfere with ergosterol synthesis. Low MICs were obtained for the azoles.

Currently, isavuconazole is under development as a new azole for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. No in vitro susceptibility data of isavuconazole toward M. mycetomatis are available. In this study, the in vitro activity of isavuconazole to M. mycetomatis is evaluated by determining the MICs of 22 M. mycetomatis strains (obtained from 21 patients in the Mycetoma Research Centre, University of Khartoum, Sudan, in 1999 and 2000) in duplicate. The strains were identified previously by morphology, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing (2, 19). MICs were determined by using the 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) assay (3). In brief, M. mycetomatis colonies were inoculated in RPMI 1640 medium containing 0.35 g/liter l-glutamine and 1.98 mM 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid, sonicated (5 s at 28-μm maximum power, Beun de Ronde, The Netherlands), and incubated for 7 days at 37°C. The mycelia were harvested by another sonication step and 5-min centrifugation at 2,628 × g. The pellet was washed and resuspended in sterile saline, and the fungal suspension was adjusted to 70% transmission at 660 nm (Novaspec II; Pharmacia Biotech). The drug concentrations tested ranged from 0.016 μg/ml to 16 μg/ml isavuconazole. As comparator agents, ketoconazole and itraconazole were tested at the same concentrations. XTT was administered to facilitate endpoint reading. MICs were determined spectrophotometrically and defined as the lowest concentration of antifungal agent where at least an 80% growth reduction was measured. Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) was included in the study as a quality control strain.

In concordance with previously published data, M. mycetomatis was strongly inhibited by low concentrations of ketoconazole and itraconazole (18), the antifungal agents currently used to treat mycetoma in the areas where mycetoma is endemic. MICs for ketoconazole and itraconazole ranged from 0.031 μg/ml to 1 μg/ml and ≤0.016 μg/ml to 0.25 μg/ml, respectively (Fig. 1). Concentrations of 0.25 μg/ml and 0.125 μg/ml were needed to inhibit 90% of the isolates (MIC90) for ketoconazole and itraconazole, respectively (Table 1). Compared to ketoconazole, significantly lower MICs were obtained for isavuconazole, ranging from ≤0.016 μg/ml to 0.125 μg/ml, with a MIC90 of 0.063 μg/ml (Mann-Whitney, P = 0.018). Compared to previously determined MICs of posaconazole (18) and voriconazole (20), MICs of isavuconazole were significantly lower than those of voriconazole (P = 0.0002) but not those of posaconazole.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

In vitro susceptibilities of 22 Madurella mycetomatis isolates to isavuconazole (ISA), ketoconazole (KTC), and itraconazole (ITC), according to the XTT assay.

Table 1.

Susceptibility of M. mycetomatis to ketoconazole, itraconazole, and isavuconazole

Antifungal agent GMa MIC (μg/ml) MIC (μg/ml)
Range 50% 90%
Ketoconazole 0.070 0.031–1 0.063 0.25
Itraconazole 0.054 ≤0.016–0.25 0.063 0.125
Isavuconazole 0.037 ≤0.016–0.125 0.031 0.063
a

GM, geometric mean.

The in vitro susceptibility of M. mycetomatis to isavuconazole is comparable to that of Exophiala spp., also a well-known cause of black-grain mycetoma (6). In contrast, white-grain mycetoma agents, like Pseudallescheria boydii and Fusarium spp., have higher MICs of isavuconazole than M. mycetomatis does (6, 10). Various studies on the in vitro activity of isavuconazole on Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., Cryptococcus neoformans, Cryptococcus gatii, and other fungi conclude that isavuconazole has at least similar or better activity than comparable antifungal compounds, like posaconazole and voriconazole (59, 12, 13, 16, 17, 21). Isavuconazole has even shown high activity against Aspergillus spp. resistant to itraconazole, caspofungin, and amphotericin B (21) and to Candida spp. resistant to fluconazole (24). In addition, in in vivo animal models of fungal infections, such as invasive aspergillosis and disseminated candidiasis, isavuconazole showed good therapeutic activity, comparable to that of voriconazole and itraconazole (11, 22, 23).

Although the activity of isavuconazole is often comparable to the activity of voriconazole, it is already known from phase I and II studies that isavuconazole has several pharmacokinetic properties that are advantageous over currently available azoles (14, 15). The prodrug BAL8557 (or isavuconazonium) is water soluble in contrast to currently used triazoles, including itraconazole and voriconazole, which require cyclodextrin to achieve solubility. Furthermore, the prodrug is rapidly converted into the active compound BAL4815, which has a longer half-life than other currently available triazoles. Also, its toxicity is lower than ketoconazole or itraconazole, and it has extensive tissue distribution and high plasma binding capacity (15). Isavuconazole is under investigation in different phase III studies on the safety and efficacy in treatment of fungal infections caused by Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., other filamentous fungi, rare molds, yeasts, and dimorphic fungi (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00413218, NCT00634049, and NCT00412893). Furthermore, in the study published by Schmitt-Hoffmann et al., in which both oral and intravenous treatment regimens in a multiple-dose study in healthy volunteers were tested, excellent bioavailability with maximum drug concentration levels in serum of >1.85 μg/ml was found (15). This serum level is much higher than the MICs obtained for M. mycetomatis in the present study (MIC90 of 0.063 μg/ml). These studies will give us a good understanding whether isavuconazole has an equal or even better therapeutic efficacy than the currently used azoles in the treatment of invasive fungal infections.

In conclusion, isavuconazole appears highly active against M. mycetomatis with significantly lower MICs than the MICs of ketoconazole. While no clinical data are available yet, the known pharmacokinetic properties of isavuconazole and the data presented in the current report suggest that isavuconazole is a promising antifungal agent in the treatment of mycetoma caused by M. mycetomatis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Veni grant 91611178 (to Wendy van de Sande) from The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research and partly by Basilea Pharmaceutica, Basel, Switzerland. J.F.M received grants from Astellas, Merck, Pfizer, Schering-Plough, Gilead, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. He has been a consultant to Basilea and Merck and received speaking fees from Merck, Pfizer, Schering-Plough, Gilead, and Janssen Pharmaceutica. All other authors had no potential conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 10 September 2012

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ahmed AA, et al. 2007. Management of mycetoma: major challenge in tropical mycoses with limited international recognition. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 20:146–151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ahmed AO, et al. 1999. Development of a species-specific PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis procedure for identification of Madurella mycetomatis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3175–3178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ahmed AO, et al. 2004. In vitro susceptibilities of Madurella mycetomatis to itraconazole and amphotericin B assessed by a modified NCCLS method and a viability-based 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) assay. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:2742–2746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ahmed AO, et al. 2004. Mycetoma caused by Madurella mycetomatis: a neglected infectious burden. Lancet Infect. Dis. 4:566–574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Badali H, de Hoog GS, Sudhadham M, Meis JF. 2011. Microdilution in vitro antifungal susceptibility of Exophiala dermatitidis, a systemic opportunist. Med. Mycol. 49:819–824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gonzalez GM. 2009. In vitro activities of isavuconazole against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi. Med. Mycol. 47:71–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Guinea J, Pelaez T, Recio S, Torres-Narbona M, Bouza E. 2008. In vitro antifungal activities of isavuconazole (BAL4815), voriconazole, and fluconazole against 1,007 isolates of zygomycete, Candida, Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Scedosporium species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:1396–1400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hagen F, et al. 2010. In vitro antifungal susceptibilities and amplified fragment length polymorphism genotyping of a worldwide collection of 350 clinical, veterinary, and environmental Cryptococcus gattii isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:5139–5145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Illnait-Zaragozi MT, et al. 2008. In vitro activity of the new azole isavuconazole (BAL4815) compared with six other antifungal agents against 162 Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from Cuba. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:1580–1582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lackner M, et al. 2012. Species-specific antifungal susceptibility patterns of Scedosporium and Pseudallescheria species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:2635–2642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Majithiya J, Sharp A, Parmar A, Denning DW, Warn PA. 2009. Efficacy of isavuconazole, voriconazole and fluconazole in temporarily neutropenic murine models of disseminated Candida tropicalis and Candida krusei. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 63:161–166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Najafzadeh MJ, Badali H, Illnait-Zaragozi MT, De Hoog GS, Meis JF. 2010. In vitro activities of eight antifungal drugs against 55 clinical isolates of Fonsecaea spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:1636–1638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Rudramurthy SM, Chakrabarti A, Geertsen E, Mouton JW, Meis JF. 2011. In vitro activity of isavuconazole against 208 Aspergillus flavus isolates in comparison with 7 other antifungal agents: assessment according to the methodology of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 71:370–377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Schmitt-Hoffmann A, et al. 2006. Single-ascending-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of the novel broad-spectrum antifungal triazole BAL4815 after intravenous infusions (50, 100, and 200 milligrams) and oral administrations (100, 200, and 400 milligrams) of its prodrug, BAL8557, in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:279–285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Schmitt-Hoffmann A, et al. 2006. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of the new antifungal triazole BAL4815 after intravenous infusion and oral administration of its prodrug, BAL8557, in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:286–293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Seifert H, Aurbach U, Stefanik D, Cornely O. 2007. In vitro activities of isavuconazole and other antifungal agents against Candida bloodstream isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:1818–1821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Shivaprakash MR, Geertsen E, Chakrabarti A, Mouton JW, Meis JF. 2011. In vitro susceptibility of 188 clinical and environmental isolates of Aspergillus flavus for the new triazole isavuconazole and seven other antifungal drugs. Mycoses 54:e583–e589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. van Belkum A, Fahal AH, van de Sande WW. 2011. In vitro susceptibility of Madurella mycetomatis to posaconazole and terbinafine. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:1771–1773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. van de Sande WW, et al. 2005. Genotyping of Madurella mycetomatis by selective amplification of restriction fragments (amplified fragment length polymorphism) and subtype correlation with geographical origin and lesion size. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4349–4356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. van de Sande WW, Luijendijk A, Ahmed AO, Bakker-Woudenberg IA, van Belkum A. 2005. Testing of the in vitro susceptibilities of Madurella mycetomatis to six antifungal agents by using the Sensititre system in comparison with a viability-based 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) assay and a modified NCCLS method. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:1364–1368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Warn PA, Sharp A, Denning DW. 2006. In vitro activity of a new triazole BAL4815, the active component of BAL8557 (the water-soluble prodrug), against Aspergillus spp. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57:135–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Warn PA, et al. 2006. Comparative in vivo activity of BAL4815, the active component of the prodrug BAL8557, in a neutropenic murine model of disseminated Aspergillus flavus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 58:1198–1207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Warn PA, et al. 2009. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel triazole, isavuconazole: mathematical modeling, importance of tissue concentrations, and impact of immune status on antifungal effect. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:3453–3461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Yamazaki T, et al. 2010. In vitro activity of isavuconazole against 140 reference fungal strains and 165 clinically isolated yeasts from Japan. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 36:324–331 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES