Abstract
Background
Foam cell formation by intimal smooth muscle cells (SMCs) inhibits the elaboration of extracellular matrix, which is detrimental to plaque stabilization. In the present study, we examined the lipoproteins and receptors involved in human SMC foam cell formation and investigated the ability of 24(S),25-epoxycholesterol [24(S),25-EC], an oxysterol agonist of the liver X receptor, to attenuate SMC foam cell formation.
Methods and Results
Incubation of human internal thoracic SMCs with atherogenic lipoproteins demonstrated that low-density lipoprotein (LDL), but not oxidized or acetylated LDL, was the primary lipoprotein taken up, resulting in marked cholesteryl ester deposition (6-fold vs 1.8-fold; P<0.05; n=4). Exposure of SMCs to exogenous or endogenously synthesized 24(S),25-EC attenuated LDL uptake (−90% and −47% respectively; P<0.05; n=3) through decreased sterol regulatory element–binding protein-2 expression (−30% and −17%, respectively; P<0.001; n=3), decreased LDL receptor expression (−75% and −40%, respectively; P<0.05; n=3) and increased liver X receptor–mediated myosin regulatory light chain interacting protein expression (7- and 3-fold, respectively; P<0.05; n=4). Furthermore, exogenous 24(S),25-EC increased adenosine triphosphate–binding cassettes A1– and G1–mediated cholesterol efflux to apolipoprotein AI (1.9-fold; P<0.001; n=5) and high-density lipoprotein3 (1.3-fold; P<0.05; n=5). 24(S),25-EC, unlike a nonsteroidal liver X receptor agonist, T0901317, did not stimulate sterol regulatory element–binding protein-1c–mediated fatty acid synthesis or triglyceride accumulation. 24(S),25-EC preserved the assembly of fibronectin and type I collagen by SMCs.
Conclusions
The oxysterol 24(S),25-EC prevented foam cell formation in human SMCs by attenuation of LDL receptor–mediated LDL uptake and stimulation of cholesterol efflux, restoring the elaboration of extracellular matrix. In contrast to T0901317, 24(S),25-EC prevented the development of a triglyceride-rich foam cell phenotype. (J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e000810 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000810.)
Keywords: vascular smooth muscle cell, lipoproteins, oxysterol, liver X receptor, cholesterol efflux
Introduction
Human smooth muscle cells (SMCs) play an integral role in atherogenesis.1 SMCs are stimulated to migrate and proliferate within the intima in response to cytokines and growth factors.1,2 SMCs in culture can accumulate lipoprotein-derived lipids and adopt a foam cell–like phenotype.3,4 Furthermore, atherosclerotic lesions contain abundant foam cells of SMC origin.1 A vital role of vascular SMCs is to stabilize lesions through the elaboration of collagen fibrils, which protects from plaque rupture.1 However, SMCs that assume the foam cell state are potentially detrimental to plaque stability. Recently, we reported that lipid accumulation renders cultured human SMCs incapable of efficiently assembling a fibrillar extracellular matrix.5 Therefore, elucidation of potential mechanisms for the prevention of SMC foam cell formation has implications for plaque stability and ultimately for clinical events.
There is still uncertainty as to which atherogenic lipoproteins stimulate human SMC foam cell formation and what mechanisms are involved in their uptake. Furthermore, SMCs display phenotypic diversity,6 and evidence has emerged that human SMC subtypes demonstrate distinct responses to atherogenic lipoproteins.5 In contrast to macrophages, rabbit aortic SMC foam cell formation was induced primarily by uptake of native low-density lipoprotein (LDL) but not modified LDL.3,4 We previously demonstrated that human SMCs isolated from the internal thoracic artery readily accumulated lipids when exposed to human LDL and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) but resisted lipid accumulation when exposed to modified lipoproteins.7 Whether this difference in lipoprotein uptake was related to differential expression of lipoprotein receptors has not been established. Furthermore, the larger, slower-growing, spindle-shaped SMC clone accumulated more lipid in response to lipoprotein exposure than did the smaller, faster-growing, epithelioid-shaped SMC clone,7 which suggests that the former cell type represents the predominant SMC foam cell precursor.
The liver X receptor (LXR) is an important regulator of cholesterol homeostasis.8 In macrophages, LXR activation by endogenous agonists, including oxysterols, or by exogenous synthetic nonsteroidal compounds, such as T0901317, activated the transcription of genes involved in cholesterol efflux, including adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette (ABC) A1 and ABCG1.8 T0901317 decreased aortic lesions in mouse models of atherosclerosis, mediated in part by attenuation of macrophage foam cell formation through enhanced cholesterol efflux.9,10 Given the abundance of SMC-derived foam cells in atherosclerotic lesions,1 LXR agonist–stimulated cholesterol efflux in SMCs could also contribute to atheroprotection. Characterization of LXR activation in SMCs remains incomplete. Although T0901317 stimulated ABCA1- and ABCG1-mediated cholesterol efflux in human SMCs,11,12 the impact of LXR activation on atherogenic lipoprotein uptake and lipid deposition has not been explored. Triglyceride has also been shown to contribute to foam cell formation, particularly in the setting of elevated plasma VLDL and free fatty acids (FA), a profile typical of the metabolic syndrome and diabetes.13 An adverse effect of nonsteroidal LXR agonists, including T0901317, is increased triglyceride accumulation, induced by transactivation of genes involved in FA synthesis, including sterol regulatory element–binding protein (SREBP)-1c and fatty acid synthase (FASN).14 In human SMCs, although T0901317 induced cholesterol efflux,11 it stimulated SREBP-1c–induced lipogenesis and triglyceride accumulation in cells exposed to adipogeneic differentiation medium.13
In macrophages, natural oxysterol LXR ligands such as 24(S),25-epoxycholesterol [24(S),25-EC], added either exogenously or synthesized endogenously, selectively activated ABCA1- and ABCG1-mediated cholesterol efflux.15,16 In contrast to T0901317, 24(S),25-EC or another oxysterol-like LXR agonist (DMHCA; N,N-dimethyl-3β-hydroxy-cholenamide) had little effect on SREBP-1c– or FASN-stimulated lipogenesis or triglyceride accumulation.15–17 Selectivity of 24(S),25-EC was attributed to inhibition of precursor (p)SREBP-1c processing to its active nuclear form (nSREBP-1c) by the oxysterol but not by T0901317, thus preventing lipogenic gene expression.15,16
Oxysterols also disrupt the maturation of SREBP-2. SREBP-2 stimulated the expression of genes involved in de novo cholesterol synthesis and lipoprotein uptake, including 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) and the LDL receptor (LDLR), respectively.18 In Chinese hamster ovary cells, 24(S),25-EC (like other oxysterols) blocked the maturation of pSREBP-2, similar to the effect observed for SREBP-1c.18,19 Whether 24(S),25-EC attenuates cholesterol accumulation in SMCs through SREBP-2–regulated gene expression has not been reported.
The objectives of the present study were 2-fold: (1) to identify the receptors responsible for lipoprotein uptake in human vascular SMCs, and (2) to examine the impact of 24(S),25-EC on SMC foam cell formation and the elaboration of extracellular matrix. We studied a clonal population of SMCs—namely, human internal thoracic (HIT) C6, which adopts a foam cell phenotype after exposure to atherogenic lipoproteins.7 We hypothesized that exogenous 24(S),25-EC or endogenously synthesized 24(S),25-EC attenuates lipoprotein-induced cholesteryl ester (CE) accumulation in SMCs, without altering triglyceride synthesis.
We demonstrate that LDL, but not modified LDL, preferentially induced SMC foam cell formation. Exogenous or endogenously synthesized 24(S),25-EC reduced SMC uptake of native LDL by inhibiting SREBP-2–mediated LDLR expression. Concurrently, 24(S),25-EC activated ABCA1- and ABCG1-mediated cholesterol efflux but did not stimulate SREBP-1c–induced lipogenesis or triglyceride accumulation. These experiments reveal a dual role for 24(S),25-EC in attenuating CE accumulation in human SMCs: reduced LDL uptake and enhanced cholesterol efflux, resulting in preservation of SMC assembly of extracellular matrix.
Methods
Cell Culture
The HIT-SMC clone used in this study, C6, is a human clonal line derived from the media of distal internal thoracic artery, as described previously.6,20 SMCs were cultured in M199 media with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen, Burlington, ON) until 100% confluent and were seeded into 100-mm or 35-mm tissue culture dishes (BD Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ) at 7000 cells/cm2 for experiments.7 Unless otherwise indicated, cells were then preincubated for 24 h in M199 media containing 0.4% FBS (basal), followed by a 24-h incubation with the indicated concentrations of 24(S),25-EC (Steraloids, Inc, Newport, RI) dissolved in 100% ethanol, T0901317 (Sigma, Oakville, ON) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma), or an inhibitor of 2,3-oxidosqualene:lanosterolcyclase (OSCi) (RO-0714565; F. Hoffmann–La Roche AG Pharmaceuticals Division, Basal, Switzerland) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. No significant effect of 24(S),25-EC, OSCi, or T0901317 on total cellular protein was observed at the concentrations tested (data not shown).
24(S),25-EC is a potent LXR ligand and is uniquely derived from a shunt in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway (reviewed in Huff et al 21). 2,3-Oxidosqualene:lanosterol cyclase (OSC), a cholesterol biosynthesis enzyme downstream of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl–coenzyme A reductase, catalyzes the conversion of 2,3-monoepoxysqualene to lanosterol, the dedicated step in cholesterol biosynthesis. If 2,3-monoepoxysqualene builds up, it is converted to 2,3;22,23-diepoxysqualene by squalene epoxidase. However, OSC also catalyzes cyclization of 2,3;22,23-diepoxysqu- alene to 24(S),25-epoxylanosterol, which is subsequently transformed into 24(S),25-EC. Synthesis of 24(S), 25-EC is favored over cholesterol under conditions of partial OSC inhibition because of the higher affinity of OSC for 2,3;22,23-diepoxysqualene than for 2,3-monoepoxysqualene. Greater inhibition of OSC eventually results in the inhibition of both 24(S),25-EC and cholesterol.21
Lipoprotein Isolation
VLDL, LDL, and high-density lipoprotein3 (HDL3) were isolatedfrom plasma of human subjects recruited from the Lipid Clinic at the London Health Sciences Centre, University Campus (London, Ontario, Canada). This study was approved by the University of Western Ontario Institutional Review Board (protocol No. 15685). Lipoproteins were separated by differential ultracentrifugation as described previously.22 LDL was oxidized (oxLDL) via the copper sulfate method22 or was acetylated (acLDL) by using acetic anhydride,23 and the extent of modification was confirmed by alterations in electrophoretic mobility.22
Microscopy of Lipid-Loaded SMCs
Fluorescence micrographs of HITC6 human vascular SMCs were obtained in cells preincubated for 24 h in M199 media containing 0.4% FBS, followed by a further 24-h incubation in M199 media plus 0.4% FBS with or without LDL (150 μg lipoprotein cholesterol/1 mL media) or VLDL (50 μg lipoprotein cholesterol/1 mL media). Paraformaldehyde-fixed cells were mounted in PermaFluor (Thermo Electron Corporation) containing Hoechst 33258 (2.5 μg/mL, Sigma), were stained with boron-dipyrromethene 493/503 (1 μg/mL, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), and were visualized by fluorescence microscopy at 493-nm excitation to identify droplets of neutral lipid.5
Assessment of SMC-Mediated Fibronectin and Collagen Assembly
HITC6 human vascular SMCs, plated in 35-mm tissue culture dishes, were preincubated for 24 h in 0.4% FBS media and then incubated for another 24 h with the addition of either vehicle or 24(S),25-EC (1 μmol/L). For a further 24 h, cells were incubated in fresh 0.4% FBS media plus vehicle or 24(S),25-EC with or without LDL (150 μg lipoprotein cholesterol/1 mL media) and Oregon Green–labeled human fibronectin (100 nmol/L) or Oregon Green–labeled rat tail collagen (1 μg/mL). Paraformaldehyde-fixed cells were stained with Oil Red O to identify neutral lipid droplets, and nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33258 (2.5 μg/mL; Sigma).
Cellular Lipid Mass
Lipid mass was determined in SMCs preincubated in media plus 0.4% FBS for 24 h (6-well [35-mm] plates), followed by a further 24-h incubation in the same media with vehicle, LXR agonists, or OSCi (compounds). Cells were then incubated in fresh M199 media plus 0.4% FBS with or without compounds and with or without 150 μg/mL (micrograms lipoprotein cholesterol per milliliter media) of native LDL, acLDL, or oxLDL or 50 μg/mL (micrograms lipoprotein cholesterol per milliliter media) VLDL plus 0.1 U/mL of bovine lipoprotein lipase.7 Lipids were extracted with hexane:isopropanol (3:2 volume:volume) and processed for lipid quantification as described previously.22 Cell protein was assayed after solubilization in 0.1 N sodium hydroxide. Total cholesterol (TC), free cholesterol (Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA), and triglyceride (Roche Diagnostics, Inc, Indianapolis, IN) were determined enzymatically by using commercial reagents as described previously.22 CE mass was calculated by subtracting free cholesterol from TC. Values were normalized to total cell protein.
Cholesterol Esterification and Cholesterol, 24(S),25-EC, Fatty Acid, and Triglyceride Synthesis
Confluent (80%) SMCs were preincubated in 6-well plates for 24 h in M199 media plus 0.4% FBS and then in the same media with or without compounds for a further 24 h. Subsequently, lipoproteins (LDL and acLDL, 150 μg/mL [micrograms lipoprotein cholesterol per milliliter media]; VLDL, 50 μg/mL [micrograms lipoprotein cholesterol per milliliter media]) plus radiolabeled [1-14C]-oleic acid complexed with FA-free bovine serum albumin (FAF:BSA) were added for 5 h in fresh M199 media plus 0.4% FBS, with or without compounds. Lipids were extracted (as described above) and separated via thin-layer chromatography, and radiolabel incorporation into CE and triglyceride was determined according to previously described methods.16,24 The synthesis of cholesterol and FA was determined in SMCs preincubated 24 h in media plus 0.4% FBS and then with vehicle, 24(S),25-EC, OSCi, or T0901317 for a further 24 h.[1-14C]-acetate with or without compounds in fresh M199 media plus 0.4% FBS was added for an additional 5 h.16 The synthesis of 24(S),25-EC was determined in SMCs preincubated for 24 h in M199 0.4% FBS media followed by a 24-h incubation with the OSCi (0 to 100 nmol/L) and [1-14C]-acetate in fresh M199 media plus 0.4% FBS. Lipid extraction, saponification, thin-layer chromatography separation, and the amount of radiolabel incorporation into cholesterol, 24(S),25-EC, and FA were determined as described previously.16 Values were normalized to total cell protein.
Lipoprotein Uptake
LDL and acLDL uptake was determined by using fluorescently labeled native and modified 1,1’-dioctadecyl-3,3,3’,3’-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI)–labeled lipoproteins (Biomedical Technologies, Inc, Stoughton, MA). Confluent (80%) SMCs in 6-well (35-mm) plates were preincubated in M199 media plus 0.4% FBS for 24 h and then were incubated with or without the addition of vehicle or compounds for a further 24 h. Subsequently, cells were incubated in fresh media and compounds in the presence or absence of 10 μg/mL DiI-LDL or DiI-acLDL for 5 h. Cells were trypsinized and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline for analysis by flow cytometry. SMCs were excited in the flow chamber of a 2-laser BD FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) using the 15-mW, 488-nm, air-cooled, argon-ion laser, and emission spectra were detected in the FL2 (PE/PI) channel (585/42 band-pass filter). Data were collected and analyzed with BD Cell Quest Pro Software.
Cholesterol Efflux
Cholesterol efflux was determined according to methods described previously.15,16 SMCs (80% confluent) were initially incubated in M199 media containing 0.4% FBS, followed by incubation with fresh M199 media containing FAF:BSA (0.2%) plus the addition of acLDL (5 μg TC) and 1 μCi of [3H]-cholesterol (Amersham Biosciences, Oakville, ON) per 1 mL of 0.2% FAF:BSA media to label endogenous cholesterol pools, for 24 h. Cells were then washed and incubated with fresh M199 0.2% FAF:BSA media with or without compounds for 24 h, followed by incubation with fresh M199 0.2% FAF:BSA media with or withoutcompounds and with or without apolipoprotein (apo) A1 (10 μg/mL) or HDL3 (100 μg/mL) for 16 h. Radioactivity was measured in aliquots of media and cell lysate by using a scintillation counter and was expressed as a percent of total radioactivity per well (media plus cell lysate). The percentage of cholesterol effluxed was normalized to total cell protein.
Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA from confluent (80%) SMCs was isolated by using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON) after 24-h preincubation in 100-mm dishes in M199 media plus 0.4% FBS, followed by a further 24 h in the same media with or without compounds, as described above. RNA (2 μg) was reverse-transcribed as described previously,16 and mRNA abundances were determined by a 2-step quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction method on an ABI Prism (model 7900HT) Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA (20 ng) was analyzed in triplicate for ABCA1, ABCG1, CD36, FASN, HMGCR, LDLR, LXRα, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), myosin regulatory light chain interacting protein (MYLIP; also known as IDOL [inducible degrader of the LDL receptor], scavenger receptor AI/II (SRAI/II), scavenger receptor class B1 (SR-B1), SREBP-1c, and SREBP-2. For each gene, the standard curve method was used to determine mRNA abundance, which was normalized to the abundance of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Quantities of mRNA for a specific gene were interpolated from a standard curve plotted as cycle threshold versus the log of the quantity of serial dilutions of a known cDNA standard. This method also allowed for the comparison of basal expression of lipoprotein receptors relative to the LDLR. Primer and probe sets for each gene were obtained from Taqman Assays-on-Demand (Applied Biosystems), with the exception of SREBP-1c, which was designed as described previously to differentiate the 2 novel exon 1 variants generated from alternative start sites.16
Immunoblotting
SMCs (80% confluent) were plated in 6-well (35-mm) plates in triplicate, were preincubated in M199 media plus 0.4% FBS, and subsequently were incubated for a further 24 h in the same media with or without compounds. SMC lysates (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 10 mmol/L NaCl, 3 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.5% Igepal, pH 7.4, containing protease inhibitor and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail according to the manufacturer's instructions [Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON]) were homogenized by passes through a 25-gauge needle. The postnuclear supernatant was obtained by centrifugation (500g, 4°C, 10 minutes). The remaining pellet was washed once with lysis buffer, was resuspended in hypertonic buffer (10 mmol/L Hepes, 0.42 mol/L NaCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 1 mmol/L DTT) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (as above), and was incubated at 4°C for 30 minutes. The nuclear fraction was obtained by centrifugation (100 000g, 4°C, 30 minutes). Protein from the postnuclear or nuclear fractions was mixed with sodium dodecyl sulfate loading buffer and subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on either an 8% (ABCA1, ABCG1, and LDLR, 20 μg or 10 μg postnuclear fraction) or 10% (SREBP-1, 30 μg nuclear and 20 μg postnuclear fractions) gel. Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes and probed with rabbit polyclonal anti-ABCA1, rabbit polyclonal anti-ABCG1 (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO), chicken polyclonal anti–human LDL receptor (Abcam, Inc, Cambridge, MA), or mouse monoclonal anti–SREBP-1 (Neomarkers, Fremont, CA), followed by the appropriate secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc, Santa Cruz, CA) for development with chemiluminescence substrate. Membranes were stripped and reprobed with a polyclonal anti–β-actin antibody (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA) for postnuclear fractions and Lamin A/C (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc, Santa Cruz, CA) for nuclear fractions for use as loading controls. Band intensities were quantified with an imaging densitometer as described previously.16
Statistical Analysis
Each experimental method was performed with biological replicates of 3 to 5 (n=3–5), with 3 to 4 technical replicates within each biological replicate. Graphical results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The Shapiro-Wilk normality test was used to test for parametric distributions in each data set. P values for observed differences between treatment and control groups were calculatedwith the Student t test for parametric data or the Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data. Statistically significant observations were defined by a 2-tailed threshold of P<0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with SigmaPlot 11.0 software (Systat, Inc, San Jose, CA).
Results
24(S),25-EC, OSCi, and T0901317 Attenuate LDL Uptake, CE Mass, and Cholesterol Esterification in SMCs
SMC foam cells were generated by exposure to human lipoproteins and yielded cells engorged with lipid droplets (Figure 1). LDL significantly increased CE mass 6-fold and cholesterol esterification 3-fold (P<0.05) (Figure 2A through 2D). Modified LDL, both acLDL and oxLDL, and native VLDL increased CE mass 1.5- to 2.5-fold (P<0.05 for each) (Figure 2A through 2C) but did not affect cholesterol esterification (P=NS) (Figure 2D). Preincubation with either 24(S),25-EC or T0901317 at 1 μmol/L significantly reduced LDL-mediated CE accumulation by ≈70% (P<0.05 for both) (Figure 2A and 2B) and prevented the LDL-induced increase in cholesterol esterification (Figure 2D). Endogenous synthesis of 24(S),25-EC, induced by the OSCi, decreased LDL-stimulated CE in a biphasic manner. The OSCi at 20 nmol/L decreased CE mass by 35% (P<0.05) (Figure 2C), which coincided with maximal 24(S),25-EC synthesis (Figure 3). The OSCi at 100 nmol/L, which did not stimulate 24(S),25-EC synthesis, did not decrease CE mass (P=NS for both). At 20 nmol/L, the OSCi prevented LDL-induced cholesterol esterification (P=NS) (Figure 2D). The modest increases in CE mass induced by acLDL, oxLDL, or VLDL (1.5- to 2-fold, P<0.05 for each) were unaffected by 24(S),25-EC, T0901317, or the OSCi (20 nmol/L) (P=NS, compared to lipid-loaded control) (Figure 2A through 2C), and cholesterol esterification rates in SMCs incubated with acLDL or VLDL were unchanged (P=NS for both). Free cholesterol mass was unaltered by any treatment (data not shown).
24(S),25-EC and OSCi Decrease LDLR Expression but Do Not Affect Scavenger Receptor Expression in SMCs
The greater CE accumulation in cells exposed to LDL, compared to acLDL, oxLDL, or VLDL, was evaluated by determining the expression of cellular receptors. Under basal conditions (0.4% FBS, 48 h), LDLR expression was >40-fold higher than that of SRAI/II, CD36, and SR-B1 (P<0.03) (Figure 4A). This difference was reflected in lipoprotein uptake. In SMCs incubated with DiI-LDL, DiI-fluoresence was increased 68-fold (P=0.01), whereas incubation with DiI-acLDL, DiI-fluoresence increased only 2-fold (P=0.001) (Figure 4B) and explains the enhanced ability of native LDL to induce SMC foam cell formation. Incubation of SMCs with LDL decreased LDLR mRNA at 6 h (−60%; P=0.029), at 16 h (−90%; P=0.029), and at 40 h (−75%; P=0.029) (Figure 5A), which was consistent with immunoblots showing low levels of LDLR protein, as assessed visually (Figure 5E). Following incubation with LDL, SRAI/II and CD36 mRNA expression did not change after 6 h and decreased ≈30% after 16 h and 40 h (P<0.05 for both). However, their expression remained <2.5% that of LDLR (P<0.03 for both) (Figure 5B, 5C, and 5F). Although the LDLR became downregulated in response to LDL, significant CE accumulation had already occurred, as was observedat 6 h (5-fold; P=0.001), and continued to be elevated at 16 h (9-fold; P=0.001) and at 40 h (12-fold; P=0.001) (Figure 5D).
Incubation of cells with 24(S),25-EC (1 μmol/L) decreased LDLR mRNA by 75% (P<0.001), LDLR protein by 60% (assessed visually), and DiI-LDL uptake by 90% (P<0.001) (Figure 4B, 4C, and 4E). In contrast, T0901317 (1 μmol/L) significantly increased LDLR mRNA 1.5-fold (P<0.001) yet decreased both LDLR protein (by 40%) and DiI-LDL uptake (by 50%) (P<0.001). The OSCi (20 nmol/L) significantly decreased LDLR mRNA by 50% (P<0.001), LDLR protein by 30%, and DiI-LDL uptake by 40% (P=0.017) (Figure 4B, 4C, and 4E). LDLR mRNA was unaffected by the OSCi at 100 nmol/L (Figure 4C).
Expression of MYLIP (or IDOL), a protein that induces ubiquitination of the LDLR and its lysosomal degradation, is regulated by LXR.25 Although MYLIP expression was low in SMCs (≈0.3% of the LDLR, P<0.002), as anticipated, its expression increased (≈2-fold; P=0.029) with LDL loading25 (Figure 6A and 6C). MYLIP mRNA was increased by 24(S),25-EC (7-fold; P<0.001) and the OSCi at 20 nmol/L (3-fold; P=0.001) (Figure 4D), indicating that MYLIP likely contributed to the decrease in LDLR protein and LDL uptake (Figure 4B and 4E). T0901317 (1 μmol/L) increased MYLIP mRNA by 7-fold (P=0.008) (Figure 4D), which suggests a mechanism for the decreased LDL protein and LDL uptake by T0901317, despite increased LDLR mRNA. 24(S),25-EC, T0901317, or the OSCi had no effect on the expression of CD36, SRAI/II, or SR-B1 (Figure 7A through 7C) and did not change the modest increase in DiI-acLDL uptake (Figure 4B).
24(S),25-EC and OSCi Reduce SREBP-2, PCSK9, and HMGCR Expression and Decrease Cholesterol Synthesis in SMCs
SREBP-2 is regulated by oxysterols and controls the expression of LDLR, PCSK9, and HMGCR. 24(S),25-EC (1 μmol/L) and the OSCi (20 nmol/L) decreased SREBP-2 mRNA by 30% and 17%, respectively (P<0.001 for both) (Figure 8A), whereas T0901317 modestly increased SREBP-2 mRNA (1.2-fold; P<0.05). The mRNA of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) codes for a protein that targets the LDLR for lysosomal degradation.26 As anticipated, PCSK9 mRNA was increased (5-fold; P=0.029) in SMCs incubated in 0.4% FBS media and was markedly reduced (−80%; P=0.029) with LDL-loading for 16 h (Figure 6B). 24(S),25-EC and the OSCi at 20 nmol/L significantly decreased PCSK9 mRNA by 80% and 40%, respectively (P<0.001 for both) (Figure 8B). Conversely, T0901317 (1 μmol/L) significantly increased PCSK9 mRNA by 2.5-fold (P=0.002) (Figure 8B), revealing another mechanism for the reduced LDLR protein, decreased LDL uptake, and lower CE accumulation, despite increased LDLR mRNA (Figure 2B and Figure 4B, 4C, and 4E) in cells preincubated with T0901317. 24(S),25-EC (1 μmol/L) decreased HMGCR mRNA by 70% (P<0.001) (Figure 8C) and cholesterol synthesis by 90% (P=0.036) (Figure 8D). The OSCi (20 nmol/L) significantly decreased HMGCR mRNA by 40% (P<0.001) and cholesterol synthesis by 70% (P=0.016). At 100 nmol/L, the OSCi decreased cholesterol synthesis by 90% (P=0.004) (Figure 8D) but did not affect HMGCR mRNA (P=NS) (Figure 8C) because of diminished 24(S),25-EC (Figure 3). In contrast, T0901317 (1 μmol/L) significantly increased both HMGCR mRNA (1.5-fold; P<0.001) and cholesterol synthesis (1.4-fold; P=008) (Figure 8C and 8D).
24(S),25-EC and T0901317 Increase the Expression of LXRα, ABCA1, and ABCG1 and Enhance Cholesterol Efflux in SMCs
T0901317 activates LXR in human coronary, aortic and bronchialSMCs.11,13,27 In human HITC6 SMCs, 24(S),25-EC, OSCi (20 nmol/L), and T0901317 activated LXR as assessed by enhanced feed-forward LXRα expression (1.4- to 1.6-fold, P<0.05) (Figure 7D). Both 24(S),25-EC (1 μmol/L) and T0901317 (1 μmol/L) increased ABCA1 mRNA 12-fold (P<0.001 for both) and increased ABCG1 expression, which was very low under basal conditions, ≈60-fold (P=0.002 for both) (Figure 9A and 9B). The OSCi (20 nmol/L) increased ABCA1 and ABCG1 mRNA 2.5- and 3.0-fold (P<0.001 for both), respectively, whereas OSCi (100 nmol/L) had no effect (P=NS) (Figure 9A and 9B). Immunoblot analysis demonstrated that 24(S),25-EC (1 μmol/L) and T0901317 (1 μmol/L) increased ABCA1 and ABCG1 protein by ≈6- to 7-fold, as assessed visually (Figure 9C and 9D). The OSCi (20 nmol/L) increased ABCA1 and ABCG1 levels 1.7- and 2.4-fold, respectively. 24(S),25-EC (1 μmol/L) and T0901317 (1 μmol/L) stimulated cholesterol efflux to FA-free BSA (FAF:BSA) (P<0.01 for both) (Figure 9E). Addition of apoAI significantly increased efflux by 30% (P<0.001) compared to FAF:BSA alone, which was stimulated further (≈2-fold) by 24(S),25-EC (1 μmol/L) or T0901317 (1 μmol/L) (P<0.01 for both) (Figure 9F). Cholesterol efflux to HDL3 was increased 4-fold (P=0.004) compared to FAF:BSA alone (Figure 9G). 24(S),25-EC or T0901317 further increased efflux to HDL3 (1.4-fold; P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively) compared to HDL3 alone. The OSCi did not affect cholesterol efflux, which suggests that the modest increases in ABCA1and ABCG1 expression were insufficient to stimulate efflux.
T0901317 but Not 24(S), 25-EC or OSCi Stimulates SREBP-1c Expression, SREBP-1 Processing, and Lipogenesis in SMCs
SMCs incubated with T0901317 and adipocyte differentiation media stimulate SREBP-1c–mediated FA synthesis, resulting in a foam cell phenotype.13 In human HITC6 SMCs, incubation with LDL, acLDL, or oxLDL did not affect triglyceride mass, but incubation of cells with VLDL increased triglyceride mass >8.0-fold (P=0.01) (Figure 10A through 10C and Figure 1). 24(S),25-EC or the OSCi did not affect triglyceride in SMCs incubated with or without lipoproteins (Figure 10A and 10C). In contrast, T0901317 increased triglyceride mass up to 1.5-fold in the absence or presence of LDL, acLDL, or oxLDL (P<0.05 for each) (Figure 10B) and increased triglyceride mass to an even greater extent (60%; P=0.023) than the 8-fold induction by VLDL alone (Figure 10B).
We determined whether 24(S),25-EC blocks SREBP-1 processing, thereby preventing lipogenesis and triglyceride accumulation. In HITC6 SMCs, 24(S),25-EC (1 μmol/L) and OSCi (20 nmol/L) stimulated moderate increases in SREBP-1c mRNA (2-fold; P=0.001 for both), whereas the OSCi at 100 nmol/L had no effect (P=NS) (Figure 11A). In contrast, T0901317 (1 μmol/L) markedly increased SREBP-1c mRNA by 10-fold (P<0.001). FASN mRNA was modestly decreased by 24(S),25-EC (−40%; P<0.001), and the OSCi had no effect(P=NS) (Figure 11B), but T0901317 (1 μmol/L) increased FASN expression 4-fold (P<0.001).
Cleavage of pSREBP-1c to nSREBP-1c is required for activation of target genes. Visual inspection of immunoblots revealed that 24(S),25-EC and OSCi (20 nmol/L) modestly increased pSREBP-1 levels, whereas nSREBP-1 levels were unaffected (Figure 11C). In contrast, T0901317 enhanced pSREBP-1 and markedly increased levels of nSREBP-1. To assess the functional significance of increased SREBP-1c mRNA, nSREBP-1 protein, and FASN mRNA, the synthesis of FA and triglyceride was determined. Neither 24(S),25-EC nor OSCi altered FA or triglyceride synthesis (P=NS) (Figure 11D and 11E). In contrast, T0901317 (1 μmol/L) significantly increased FA synthesis by 2.8-fold (P=0.008) and triglyceride synthesis by 1.3-fold (P=0.05) (Figure 11D and 11E).
24(S),25-EC Restores SMC Assembly of Fibonectin and Collagen Fibrils
We assessed whether SMC-dependent functions were retained by 24(S),25-EC in SMCs exposed to LDL. Elaboration of extracellular matrix was evaluated by examining microscopically the assembly of fibronectin and type I collagen fibrils in SMCs after the addition of labeled soluble precursors of either fibronectin or collagen. SMCs not exposed to LDL assembled an elaborate network of both fibronectin and collagen fibrils (Figure 12). Incubation of SMCs with LDL resulted in a marked decrease in their ability to assemble these fibrils, commensurate with increased Oil Red O–stained lipid, as we reported previously.5 In contrast, preincubation of cells with 24(S),25-EC, followed by the addition of LDL, decreased Oil Red O–stained lipid and preserved the ability of SMCs to assemble both fibronectin and collagen.
Discussion
Human SMC–derived foam cells promote atherosclerosis; they are observed within the musculoelastic layer at early stages and within the intimal fibrotic layer of intermediate and advanced lesions.1 Our results revealed that in human SMCs, native LDL was the predominant lipoprotein responsible for the induction of CE accumulation, whereas uptake of modified LDL was limited. This differencecorrelated with greater LDLR expression than scavenger receptor expression. Furthermore, we show for the first time that 24(S),25-EC attenuates CE accumulation in SMCs challenged with human LDL. Reduced LDL uptake by 24(S),25-EC was linked to inhibition of SREBP-2–mediated LDLR expression. 24(S),25-EC also increased MYLIP expression, which contributed to the decrease in LDLR protein and LDL uptake. 24(S),25-EC stimulated cholesterol efflux via activation of ABCA1 and ABCG1, further reducing intracellular cholesterol. The impact of endogenously synthesized 24(S),25-EC was qualitatively similar. Importantly, with exposure of SMCs to 24(S),25-EC, in contrast to the nonsteroidal LXR agonist T0901317, cholesterol efflux was selectively increased without inducing a triglyceride-rich foam cell phenotype.
Recently, we demonstrated that human SMCs display impaired assembly of type I collagen and fibronectin after lipid accumulation induced by LDL or VLDL.5 These findings directly link SMC foam cell formation with failure to elaborate extracellular matrix, potentially accounting for reduced plaque stability. These human SMCs, the same clone as those used in the present study, maintained expression of SMC-specific markers upon lipid loading.5 We now show that attenuated LDL-induced CE accumulation and enhanced cholesterol efflux by 24(S),25-EC preserves the assembly of fibrillar collagen and fibronectin, a characteristic of a more productive SMC phenotype.
CE accumulation in SMCs challenged with acLDL or oxLDL was substantially lower than in those challenged with LDL (1.5- versus 6-fold; P<0.05). These human SMCs expressed more LDLR (>40-fold higher) than CD36 and SRAI/II, consistent with previous reports that scavenger receptor expression was undetectable in intimal or medial SMCs within human atherosclerotic lesions.28 In cultured rabbit aortic SMCs, uptake of modified lipoproteins was low, whereas CE accumulation was derived from native LDL.4 Our results provide direct evidence that CE accumulation in human SMCs is primarily a consequence of LDL uptake. This differs from macrophages, in which modified lipoproteins primarily drive foam cell formation.29 Furthermore, our results extend the concept that VLDL-induced triglyceride accumulation in SMCs results in a foam cell–like phenotype.5,7
Expression of LDLR, PCSK9, and HMGCR is primarily regulated by the nuclear form of SREBP-2.18,30 We demonstrated that SMCs exposed to exogenous or endogenous 24(S),25-EC contained less SREBP-2 and LDLR mRNA, consistent with diminished LDLR expression in macrophages15 and fibroblasts31 incubated with 24(S),25-EC. The mechanism involved oxysterol-mediated disruption of pSREBP-2 maturation, preventing LDLR expression and the feed-forward amplification of SREBP-2 transcription.19,31,32 The present study is the first to report that 24(S),25-EC in human SMCs decreased expression of SREBP-2–responsive genes, SREBP-2 and LDLR, and increased the expression of MYLIP, resulting in blunted LDLR expression and the attenuation of LDL uptake and CE accumulation.
The SREBP-2–mediated expression of PCSK932 was also decreased by 24(S),25-EC in SMCs. As PCSK9 targets the LDLR for lysosomal degradation,26,30 decreased PCSK9 expression would be expected to impede LDLR degradation.26,30 The ability of 24(S),25-EC to also decrease SREBP-2–mediated LDLR mRNA when combined with the increased LXR-stimulated MYLIP expression, which would promote LDLR degradation,25 resulted in attenuation of LDLR protein and LDL uptake. 24(S),25-EC also inhibited HMGCR expression, providing further evidence that 24(S),25-EC prevented pSREBP-2 maturation.31 As oxysterols are known to increase HMGCR enzyme degradation,33 the reduced transcription and increased degradation of HMGCR provided a plausible mechanism for the marked reduction of cholesterol synthesis in 24(S),25-EC–treated SMCs.
Partial inhibition of OSC reduced cholesterol synthesis while maximizing 24(S),25-EC synthesis.15,16 In SMCs, endogenous 24(S),25-EC inhibited the expression of SREBP-2, LDLR, and PCSK9 and increased MYLIP expression, collectively resulting in diminished LDLR-mediated LDL uptake. Although the effect of OSCi was less marked, likely because maximal synthesis of 24(S)-25-EC was lower than optimal concentrations of exogenous 24(S),25-EC, reduced LDL uptake remained significant (P=0.017).
In contrast to 24(S),25-EC, T0901317 increased SREBP-2, LDLR, PCSK9, and HMGCR expression, which led to enhanced cholesterol synthesis yet a significant decrease in LDL uptake (P<0.001). T0901317, a nonsteroid, did not inhibit pSREBP-2 maturation and thus stimulated expression of SREBP-2–responsive genes. Enhanced LDLR and PCSK9 expression have been observed in T0901317-treated hepatocytes.25,34 Although the LDLR promoter contains an LXR response element,35 expression is significantly more responsive to sterol response element activation, which provides an explanation for increased LDLR expression by T0901317 but not by 24(S),25-EC. In the present study, T0901317 markedly induced SREBP-1c expression and nSREBP-1 protein, similar to a previous report in SMCs.13 In contrast to 24(S),25-EC, the T0901317-induced overabundance of nSREBP-1 likely increased nonselective binding to SREs and activation of both SREBP-1c– and SREBP-2–target genes. This has been demonstrated in T0901317-treated Huh7 cells35 and in tissues in which nSREBPs are overexpressed.36
PCSK9 expression is primarily regulated by SREBP-2; however, a recent report revealed marked SREBP-1c stimulation of PCSK9 mRNA in T0901317-treated hepatoctyes.32,34 Although an LXRresponse element has not been identified in the PCSK9 promoter, the increase we observed in PCSK9 mRNA in T0901317-treated SMCs but not in 24(S),25-EC–treated SMCs indicated that PCSK9 expression was highly responsive to nSREBP-1c. Despite increased LDLR mRNA by T0901317, the ability of T0901317 to also increase the expression of both MYLIP25 and PCSK9 resulted in diminished LDLR protein and decreased LDL uptake.
Activation of ABCA1 and ABCG1 and cholesterol efflux by synthetic LXR agonists has been documented in rat aortic SMCs27 and human coronary12 and airway11 SMCs. Furthermore, T0901317-induced cholesterol efflux in human airway SMCs was mediated exclusively by ABCA1.11 In the present study, we demonstrate in HITC6 SMCs that exogenous 24(S),25-EC increased LXRα, ABCA1, and ABCG1 expression, which led to enhanced cholesterol efflux. These observations are consistent with our previous studies in macrophages.15,16 Furthermore, we show that 24(S),25-EC–mediated cholesterol efflux contributed to the attenuation of SMC foam cells. Endogenous synthesis of 24(S),25-EC, induced by partial OSC inhibition, increased ABCA1 and ABCG1 expression to levels ≈20% of those in cells exposed to exogenous 24(S),25-EC yet did not increase cholesterol efflux. Therefore, although SMCs synthesize endogenous 24(S),25-EC, LXR-induced gene expression was likely below the threshold for facilitating cholesterol removal.
LXR has been shown to regulate de novo FA biosynthesis through expression of SREBP-1c and FASN.14 T0901317 stimulated FA synthesis and triglyceride accumulation in cells and mice.9,15,16 In human SMCs, T0901317 increased de novo FA synthesis when incubated in adipocyte differentiation media.13 Increased lipogenesis appears to be exclusive to nonsteroidal LXR agonists such as T0901317, because oxysterols such as 24(S),25-EC and 22(R)-OH did not affect lipogenesis in macrophages.15,16 Our results clearly show that in human SMCs, 24(S),25-EC did not stimulate SREBP-1c or FASN mRNA and did not increase nSREBP-1 protein or synthesis of FA and triglyceride. Furthermore, triglyceride accumulation in SMCs exposed to lipoproteins was unaffected, whereas T0901317 stimulated FA synthesis and amplified triglyceride accumulation, especially in SMCs incubated with VLDL. This is consistent with a mechanism in which 24(S),25-EC, but not T0901317, retains pSREBP-1c within the endoplasmic reticulum, preventing nSREBP-1 formation and nSREBP-1c–stimulated gene expression, including the feed-forward activation of SREBP-1c itself.37 Thus, 24(S),25-EC acts as a safety valve to diminish cellular cholesterol and prevent excessive FA synthesis and triglyceride storage. In recent studies, synthetic oxysterol-like LXR agonists reduced atherosclerosis in mice but, like steroidal agonists, did not induce FA synthesis.38 Therefore, the present study in SMCs and our previous studies in macrophages15,16 demonstrate that 24(S),25-EC has the potential to selectively activate LXR-regulated cholesterol efflux from cells involved in atherogenesis, without inducing lipogenesis.
SMCs participate in plaque development and have the propensity to develop into foam cells through acquisition of lipoprotein-derived lipids. Controlling cholesterol homeostasis in SMCs represents an attractive mechanism to maintain SMCs in a reparative phenotype. Exposure of human SMCs to the oxysterol LXR agonist 24(S),25-EC reduced native LDL uptake, the primary mechanism for SMC foam cell formation. Furthermore, 24(S),25-EC promoted cholesterol efflux without inducing lipogenesis. Diversion of SMCs from a foam cell state restored their ability to elaborate extracellular matrix, which has the potential to enhance lesion stabilization.
Acknowledgments
Dawn Telford is acknowledged for technical contributions.
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FRN-8014 to Dr Huff and FRN-11715 to Dr Pickering) and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (PRG-5967 to Dr Huff and T-7081 to Dr Pickering). Dr Beyea held a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada Graduate Scholarship Doctoral Award.
Disclosures
None.
References
- 1.Doran AC, Meller N, McNamara CA. Role of smooth muscle cells in the initiation and early progression of atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:812-819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pickering JG, Weir L, Jekanowski J, Kearney MA, Isner JM. Proliferative activity in peripheral and coronary atherosclerotic plaque among patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:1469-1480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pitas RE, Friera A, McGuire J, Dejager S. Further characterization of the acetyl LDL (scavenger) receptor expressed by rabbit smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:1235-1244 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hoff HF, Pepin JM, Morton RE. Modified low density lipoprotein isolated from atherosclerotic lesions does not cause lipid accumulation in aortic smooth muscle cells. J Lipid Res. 1991;32:115-124 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Frontini MJ, O'Neil C, Sawyez C, Chan BM, Huff MW, Pickering JG. Lipid incorporation inhibits Src-dependent assembly of fibronectin and type I collagen by vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 2009;104:832-841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li S, Fan YS, Chow LH, Van Den Diepstraten C, van Der Veer E, Sims SM, Pickering JG. Innate diversity of adult human arterial smooth muscle cells: cloning of distinct subtypes from the internal thoracic artery. Circ Res. 2001;89:517-525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Argmann CA, Sawyez CG, Li S, Nong Z, Hegele RA, Pickering JG, Huff MW. Human smooth muscle cell subpopulations differentially accumulate cholesteryl ester when exposed to native and oxidized lipoproteins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:1290-1296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tontonoz P, Mangelsdorf DJ. Liver X receptor signaling pathways in cardiovascular disease. Mol Endocrinol. 2003;17:985-993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tangirala RK, Bischoff ED, Joseph SB, Wagner BL, Walczak R, Laffitte BA, Daige CL, Thomas D, Heyman RA, Mangelsdorf DJ, Wang X, Lusis AJ, Tontonoz P, Schulman IG. Identification of macrophage liver X receptors as inhibitors of atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:11896-11901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Naik SU, Wang X, Da Silva JS, Jaye M, Macphee CH, Reilly MP, Billheimer JT, Rothblat GH, Rader DJ. Pharmacological activation of liver X receptors promotes reverse cholesterol transport in vivo. Circulation. 2006;113:90-97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Delvecchio CJ, Bilan P, Nair P, Capone JP. LXR-induced reverse cholesterol transport in human airway smooth muscle is mediated exclusively by ABCA1. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008;295:L949-L957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Choi HY, Rahmani M, Wong BW, Allahverdian S, McManus BM, Pickering JG, Chan T, Francis GA. ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 expression and apolipoprotein A-I binding are impaired in intima-type arterial smooth muscle cells. Circulation. 2009;119:3223-3231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Davies JD, Carpenter KL, Challis IR, Figg NL, McNair R, Proudfoot D, Weissberg PL, Shanahan CM. Adipocytic differentiation and liver x receptor pathways regulate the accumulation of triacylglycerols in human vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:3911-3919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Joseph SB, Laffitte BA, Patel PH, Watson MA, Matsukuma KE, Walczak R, Collins JL, Osborne TF, Tontonoz P. Direct and indirect mechanisms for regulation of fatty acid synthase gene expression by liver X receptors. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:11019-11025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rowe AH, Argmann CA, Edwards JY, Sawyez CG, Morand OH, Hegele RA, Huff MW. Enhanced synthesis of the oxysterol 24(S),25-epoxycholesterol in macrophages by inhibitors of 2,3-oxidosqualene:lanosterol cyclase: a novel mechanism for the attenuation of foam cell formation. Circ Res. 2003;93:717-725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Beyea MM, Heslop CL, Sawyez CG, Edwards JY, Markle JG, Hegele RA, Huff MW. Selective up-regulation of LXR-regulated genes ABCA1, ABCG1, and APOE in macrophages through increased endogenous synthesis of 24(S),25-epoxycholesterol. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5207-5216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Quinet EM, Savio DA, Halpern AR, Chen L, Miller CP, Nambi P. Gene-selective modulation by a synthetic oxysterol ligand of the liver X receptor. J Lipid Res. 2004;45:1929-1942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Horton JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J Clin Invest. 2002;109:1125-1131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Radhakrishnan A, Ikeda Y, Kwon HJ, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Sterol-regulated transport of SREBPs from endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi: oxysterols block transport by binding to Insig. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:6511-6518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li S, Sims S, Jiao Y, Chow LH, Pickering JG. Evidence from a novel human cell clone that adult vascular smooth muscle cells can convert reversibly between noncontractile and contractile phenotypes. Circ Res. 1999;85:338-348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huff MW, Telford DE. Lord of the rings—the mechanism for oxidosqualene:lanosterol cyclase becomes crystal clear. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2005;26:335-340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Whitman SC, Miller DB, Wolfe BM, Hegele RA, Huff MW. Uptake of type III hypertriglyceridemic VLDL by macrophages is enhanced by oxidation, especially after remnant formation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:1707-1715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goldstein JL, Ho YK, Basu SK, Brown MS. Binding site on macrophages that mediates uptake and degradation of acetylated low density lipoprotein, producing massive cholesterol deposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:333-337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huff MW, Evans AJ, Sawyez CG, Wolfe BM, Nestel PJ. Cholesterol accumulation in J774 macrophages induced by triglyceride-rich lipoproteins: comparison of very low density lipoprotein from subjects with type III, IV, and V hyperlipoproteinemias. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:221-233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zelcer N, Hong C, Boyadjian R, Tontonoz P. LXR regulates cholesterol uptake through Idol-dependent ubiquitination of the LDL receptor. Science. 2009;325:100-104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Qian YW, Schmidt RJ, Zhang Y, Chu S, Lin A, Wang H, Wang X, Beyer TP, Bensch WR, Li W, Ehsani ME, Lu D, Konrad RJ, Eacho PI, Moller DE, Karathanasis SK, Cao G. Secreted PCSK9 downregulates low density lipoprotein receptor through receptor-mediated endocytosis. J Lipid Res. 2007;48:1488-1498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Blaschke F, Leppanen O, Takata Y, Caglayan E, Liu J, Fishbein MC, Kappert K, Nakayama KI, Collins AR, Fleck E, Hsueh WA, Law RE, Bruemmer D. Liver X receptor agonists suppress vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and inhibit neointima formation in balloon-injured rat carotid arteries. Circ Res. 2004;95:e110-e123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Luoma J, Hiltunen T, Sarkioja T, Moestrup SK, Gliemann J, Kodama T, Nikkari T, Yla-Herttuala S. Expression of alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor–related protein and scavenger receptor in human atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:2014-2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Linton MF, Fazio S. Class A scavenger receptors, macrophages, and atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2001;12:489-495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Horton JD, Cohen JC, Hobbs HH. Molecular biology of PCSK9: its role in LDL metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci. 2007;32:71-77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Janowski BA, Shan B, Russell DW. The hypocholesterolemic agent LY295427 reverses suppression of sterol regulatory element–binding protein processing mediated by oxysterols. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:45408-45416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jeong HJ, Lee HS, Kim KS, Kim YK, Yoon D, Park SW. Sterol-dependent regulation of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 expression by sterol-regulatory element binding protein-2. J Lipid Res. 2008;49:399-409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Goldstein JL, DeBose-Boyd RA, Brown MS. Protein sensors for membrane sterols. Cell. 2006;124:35-46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Costet P, Cariou B, Lambert G, Lalanne F, Lardeux B, Jarnoux AL, Grefhorst A, Staels B, Krempf M. Hepatic PCSK9 expression is regulated by nutritional status via insulin and sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:6211-6218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ishimoto K, Tachibana K, Sumitomo M, Omote S, Hanano I, Yamasaki D, Watanabe Y, Tanaka T, Hamakubo T, Sakai J, Kodama T, Doi T. Identification of human low-density lipoprotein receptor as a novel target gene regulated by liver X receptor alpha. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:4929-4933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Horton JD, Shah NA, Warrington JA, Anderson NN, Park SW, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Combined analysis of oligonucleotide microarray data from transgenic and knockout mice identifies direct SREBP target genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:12027-12032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Amemiya-Kudo M, Shimano H, Yoshikawa T, Yahagi N, Hasty AH, Okazaki H, Tamura Y, Shionoiri F, Iizuka Y, Ohashi K, Osuga J, Harada K, Gotoda T, Sato R, Kimura S, Ishibashi S, Yamada N. Promoter analysis of the mouse sterol regulatory element–binding protein-1c gene. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:31078-31085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kratzer A, Buchebner M, Pfeifer T, Becker TM, Uray G, Miyazaki M, Miyazaki-Anzai S, Ebner B, Chandak PG, Kadam RS, Calayir E, Rathke N, Ahammer H, Radovic B, Trauner M, Hoefler G, Kompella UB, Fauler G, Levi M, Levak-Frank S, Kostner GM, Kratky D. Synthetic LXR agonist attenuates plaque formation in apoE–/– mice without inducing liver steatosis and hypertriglyceridemia. J Lipid Res. 2009;50:312-326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]