Skip to main content
Bioengineered logoLink to Bioengineered
. 2012 Nov 1;3(6):358–364. doi: 10.4161/bioe.21541

Recombinant ROP2, ROP4, GRA4 and SAG1 antigen-cocktails as possible tools for immunoprophylaxis of toxoplasmosis

What’s next?

Bozena Dziadek 1,, Anna Brzostek 2
PMCID: PMC3489714  PMID: 22892593

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis is a globally distributed foodborne zoonosis caused by a protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii. Usually asymptomatic in immunocompetent humans, toxoplasmosis is a serious clinical and veterinary problem often leading to lethal damage in an infected host. In order to overcome the exceptionally strong clinical and socio-economic impact of Toxoplasma infection, the construction of an effective vaccine inducing full immunoprotection against the parasite is an urgent issue. In the last two decades many live attenuated, subunit and DNA-based vaccines against toxoplasmosis have been studied, however only partial protection conferred by vaccination against chronic as well as acute infection has been achieved. Among various immunization strategies, no viable subunit vaccines based on recombinant secretory (ROP2, ROP4 and GRA4) and surface (SAG1) T. gondii proteins have been found as attractive tools for further studies. This is due to their high, but still partial, protective efficacy correlated with the induction of cellular and humoral immune responses.

Keywords: immunoprotection, live attenuated vectors, recombinant Toxoplasma gondii proteins, subunit vaccines, toxoplasmosis

Introduction

Apicomplexan protozoon Toxoplasma gondii is one of the most world-wide spread parasites and etiological agent’s of toxoplasmosis. This evolutionarily successful obligate intracellular pathogen invades many species of warm-blooded animals including humans and replicates in virtually all of the hosts nucleated cells. It is estimated that about one-third of the human world population (between 10% and 85% depending on the geographical location) is infected with T. gondii and the foodborne toxoplasmosis is ranked at the same level as salmonellosis or campylobacteriosis.1,2 The life-cycle of this intracellular parasite includes definitive and intermediate hosts and three infectious life-stages (sporozoites, tachyzoites and bradyzoites) (Fig. 1). Development of sporozoites is the outcome of the sexual phase of the Toxoplasma life-cycle occurring within gut epithelial cells of Felids, the only known Toxoplasma definitive hosts (e.g., domestic cats). The sexual phase results in the production and shedding of environmentally resistant oocysts in the feces of the infected cats. In contact to the environment, oocysts sporulate and become fully infectious. Finally, a mature oocyst contains two sets of four sporozoites, each set enclosed within a single sporocyst, and is able to infect other definitive or intermediate hosts. Generation of the two other Toxoplasma infectious life-stages, tachyzoites and bradyzoites, takes place during the asexual development in intermediate hosts. Although, the asexual division also occurs in definitive hosts, it is necessary only to increase the number of parasites before the sexual phase of the life-cycle and leads to the merozoite stage. In intermediate hosts the presence of tachyzoites and bradyzoites depends on the phase of toxoplasmosis, acute or chronic, respectively. After ingestion of oocysts or tissue cysts present in contaminated food, the cysts are ruptured and sporozoites and bradyzoites are released in the intestinal lumen. Both forms infect host gut epithelial cells and differentiate to tachyzoites. Tachyzoites are a rapidly multiplying form of the parasite replicating intracellularly within a unique non-fusogenic compartment referred to as a parasitophorous vacuole (PV). As a properly functioning immune system limits the acute uncontrolled parasite replication and dissemination within a host, tachyzoites differentiate into slow-growing bradyzoites, the terminal stage of the Toxoplasma life-cycle. Dormant bradyzoites are sequestered within tissue cysts located predominantly in the central nervous system and muscle tissue and may persist as a latent form for the life of the host.3,4

graphic file with name bbug-3-358-g1.jpg

Figure 1.Toxoplasma gondii life cycle.

Globally distributed infections with T. gondii represent a serious clinical and veterinary problem. In immunocompetent individuals toxoplasmosis is mostly asymptomatic or could be demonstrated by nonspecific mild mononucleosis-like symptoms manifested predominantly as lymphadenopathy. A real clinical problem is posed by devastating T. gondii invasions in immunocompromised persons such as AIDS patients, organ transplant recipients and patients with malignancies leading even to lethal damage in infected hosts. Primary adult acquired infection with T. gondii in immunocompetent hosts induces strong cellular and humoral immunological responses resulting in both lifelong protection and lifelong chronic infection. The protective immunity rests mainly on innate and adaptive cellular mechanisms. The crucial element of innate cellular immunity is interleukin 12 (IL-12) produced by dendritic cells, macrophages, monocytes and neutrophils. This cytokine is responsible for the regulation of IFN-γ synthesis by natural killer (NK) cells as well as by Th1 CD4+ and cytotoxic CD8+ lymphocytes, which are considered as the major effector cells for protection against the parasite.5,6 The importance of B cells for an effective prevention of toxoplasmosis is still not fully understood but their cooperative response seems to be favorable in controlling T. gondii invasion. A synthesis and release of the parasite-specific antibodies could limit ToxoplasmaToxoplasma spread by inhibiting the attachment of tachyzoites to host cells and promoting extracellular and intracellular killing of antibody-coated parasites by a complement-dependent pathway and macrophages, respectively.7-9

A substantial clinical problem is also congenital toxoplasmosis resulting from the vertical transplacental transmission of the parasite from a primary infected pregnant mother to the fetus. In congenitally infected infants parasitosis can be manifested as retinochoroiditis, intracranial calcification, microcephaly, hydrocephalus, mental retardation or can even result in spontaneous abortion and neonatal death. In veterinary medicine infections with T. gondii in free-ranging farm animals have economic importance due to stillbirth, abortion and neonatal loss in many kinds of livestock. Moreover, similarly to oocysts contaminating the environment (e.g., water, soil, vegetables and fruit), the parasite tissue cysts contained in meat or meat products from infected livestock, mainly poultry and pigs, are considered as a major source of the parasite’s horizontal transmission to humans.1,2,10

Efforts to overcome an enormous clinical and socio-economic impact of toxoplasmosis have been focused mainly on the development of efficient tools for immunoprophylaxis of this disease. The available anti-parasitic chemotherapeutic agents used for the treatment of Toxoplasma infections (e.g., pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine) fail to eliminate the life-long chronic infection and frequently cause adverse toxic effects. Currently, the only commercially available vaccine against toxoplasmosis is “Toxovax” based on live tachyzoites of T. gondii S48 strain attenuated by repeated passages in mice. This vaccine is mostly used for sheep immunization to diminish the economic losses related to the parasite-induced abortion. Unfortunately, vaccination with “Toxovax” is not approved in humans due to the short-lived infection induced by S48 tachyzoites and a possible risk of the reversion of the attenuated mutant into the pathogenic form.11,12

The lifelong protection developed in response to primary Toxoplasma infection indicates that immunoprophylaxis of toxoplasmosis is a realistic goal. In the past several years, many vaccination trials of human and veterinary live attenuated, subunit and DNA-based vaccines have been performed and various levels of protective immunity have been achieved. However, due to the restrictive requirements set for human vaccines, it would be rather undesirable to use live attenuated Toxoplasma strains for immunoprophylactic treatment in people.12,13

Protective Efficacy Of Recombinant ROP2, ROP4, GRA4 and SAG1 Protein Cocktails

A key factor determining the effectiveness of each vaccine is its antigen composition. Antigens used as vaccination tools should play an important role in pathogenicity and elicit in immunized individuals immune mechanisms required for the long-term protection against a desired pathogen. In search of such antigens, the components of the future vaccine for toxoplasmosis, we initially focused on the determination of Toxoplasma transferrins-binding proteins since the acquisition of iron mainly from host iron-transporting proteins (transferrin or lactoferrin) is considered as one of the most important mechanisms essential for parasites growth during infection.14 The performed study revealed the members of ROP2-rhoptry protein family, ROP2 and ROP4 proteins (Fig. 2), as ligands for human lactoferrin indicating these antigens as potentially involved in the uptake of iron from the infected host.15 This fact, together with the findings of other laboratories showing the expression of ROP2 and ROP4 in three life-stages of T. gondii (tachyzoites, bradyzoites and sporozoites),16,17 their contribution to many fundamental functions for Toxoplasma host cell invasion (e.g., PV formation, modulation of PV membrane properties, interaction with the mitochondrial import machinery, etc.)18,19 and their documented immunogenic potential,20-23 made these antigens very valuable candidates for further studies. To overcome disadvantages associated with the administration of live attenuated parasites, such as morbidity and mortality in vaccinates, we decided to use a subunit vaccine composed of recombinant forms of Toxoplasma proteins. Moreover, since bivalent vaccine comprising recombinant forms of ROP2 and ROP4 showed rather a low level of protection (46% of reduction of the brain cysts number),24 we enriched the cocktail of the rhoptry antigens with recombinant SAG1 and GRA4 proteins (Fig. 2). The latter proteins play an essential role in T. gondii immunogenicity and pathogenicity. The SAG1 protein is a well-defined, highly immunogenic main surface antigen of tachyzoites considered as an essential element of the parasite attachment to the host cell.25 Dense granule protein GRA4 is a secretory protein characteristic for Toxoplasma tachyzoites, bradyzoites and sporozoites responsible for induction of the protective immunity and modification of the microenvironment inside the PV, which is crucial for intracellularly replicating tachyzoites.26 The immunogenic and protective efficacy of the three designed vaccines composed of rROP2 + rGRA4 + rSAG1, rROP4 + rROP2 + rGRA4 and rROP2 + rROP4 + rSAG1 was tested in the experimental mouse model of chronic toxoplasmosis in three inbred mouse strains C57BL/6 (haplotyp H-2b), C3H/HeJ ((haplotyp H-2k) and BALB/c (haplotyp H-2d), whose different genetic background determines their high, intermediate and low susceptibility to T. gondii infection, respectively. This complex study revealed the protective and immunogenic potential of the studied vaccines dependent on the antigen composition and the genetic background of immunized mice. The highest protection level detected as a decrease in brain cysts formation was induced by the mixture of the rhoprty proteins with rSAG1 antigen and reached 90%, 71% and 77% in C57BL/6, C3H/HeJ and BALB/c mice, respectively. This strong, but still partial, protection was correlated with the generation of vaccine-induced immune response manifested as a synthesis of the systemic antigen-specific IgG antibodies in the sera of vaccinated laboratory animals and increased in vitro production of Th1-type cytokines, IFN-γ and IL-2, by specific antigen-stimulated spleen cells of the immunized mice.27,28 In our studies we used the intraperitoneal challenge of mice with the cyst-forming DX strain of T. gondii. Obviously, intraperitoneal administration of the parasite is not natural compared with the oral route of infection, however, it was indicated that such an experimental protocol provides the most reliable and quantitative challenge29 and has been frequently used in many studies. Although the oral route is the main avenue of T. gondii invasion, it should also be mentioned that the parasite invasions arise in all transplant recipient groups, but at varying frequencies depending on a type of transplanted organs. It was reported that 57% heart, 20% liver, around 1% kidney and 0.5–2% bone marrow transplant recipients who were Toxoplasma-negative before transplantation and who received organs from Toxoplasma-positive donors acquired the primary parasite infection resulting in relatively high morbidity and mortality. Clinically the situation can be more complicated for these patients since the immunosuppressive treatment exposes them to an increased risk of severe life-threatening toxoplasmosis. Additionally, the diagnosis of the parasite invasion in organ transplant recipients is not always unequivocal due to the atypical immune responses. Moreover, in some cases the incidence of T. gondii infection was not even considered and the parasitosis was documented postmortem.30

graphic file with name bbug-3-358-g2.jpg

Figure 2.Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoite with secretory organelles and nucleus.

Future Prospects

There are several possible strategies used to enhance the effectiveness of the vaccination against toxoplasmosis. The most frequently studied are: (1) inclusion of additional antigens into vaccine formulation, (2) usage of new adjuvants directing the immune response of an immunized individual toward Th1-type or (3) mucosal delivery of the subunit vaccine that is more convenient due to the oral route of Toxoplasma infection and stimulation of not only systemic but also local immune response related to the mucosal surfaces.

Among different antigens considered as possible tools to improve the protective effect of ROP2+ROP4+GRA4/SAG1 vaccination, Toxoplasma microneme and rhoptry neck proteins (RON) seem to be very interesting candidates. Micronemal apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) and RON proteins cooperate in the formation of the moving junction, a key tight connection between the parasite and the plasma membrane of the host cell. This structure is crucial for Toxoplasma invasion and influences the PV generation as well as the biochemical properties of the PVM.18,31 Additionally, AMA1 specific antibodies and the reduced expression of AMA1 protein contribute to a loss of or a significant decrease in the Toxoplasma ability to invade host cells.32,33 Dautu et al.34 found that immunization of BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice with plasmid DNA encoding AMA1 led to the development of specific IgG2a or IgG2c antibodies, respectively, and resulted in enhanced cellular immune response associated with the increased release of IFN-γ. Moreover, partial but significant protection against acute toxoplasmosis was noted as a result of ama1 DNA vaccination. Apart from AMA1 antigen, many experimental trials of single- or multi-antigenic/epitope vaccines against toxoplasmosis revealed transmembrane (MIC2,34,35 MIC6,36 MIC837) and soluble (MIC1,38 MIC3,39-41 MIC435,38) microneme proteins as potent stimulators of specific humoral and cellular immune responses able to protect vaccinated mice against acute and chronic Toxoplasma infection. These proteins are also particularly interesting since they are responsible for the parasite gliding motility, adhesion to the host cell and serve as essential determinants of the parasite virulence and invasion process (e.g., MIC1,42 MIC2,43 MIC3,42 MIC844). In contrast to frequently studied microneme proteins, only one rhoptry neck protein, RON4, was tested in terms of its suitability as a component of a future vaccine against toxoplasmosis. Immunization of CBA/J mice with recombinant RON4 proteins (full-length RON4, C-terminal part of RON4 and N-terminal part of RON4) or ron4 gene showed for the first time the immunogenic properties of this Toxoplasma protein related to the development of antigen-specific IgG antibodies and the production of Th1-type cytokines. However, the RON4 or ron4 DNA based vaccination failed to successfully protect immunized mice against chronic Toxoplasma infection provided by an oral challenge with 70 cysts of the parasite 76K strain.45 In the future studies the other members of rhoptry neck protein family, RON2, RON5 and RON8, that form a moving junction complex with the micronemal AMA1 antigen, could be also valuable as vaccine antigens. Similarly to micronemal proteins, RON antigens seem to be worth special attention in designing a new improved rROP2+rROP4+rGRA4/rSAG1 vaccine due to their proved critical role in the moving junction development and invasion by T. gondii.18,31

Efficacy of modern prophylactic or therapeutic subunit vaccines usually depends on the addition of adjuvants that can modulate and enhance the immune response to administered antigens. Adjuvants subjected for clinical applications should possess a documented safety profile, reproducible formulations and should not interfere with the stability of vaccine components. In the studies on the immunogenic and protective potential of the mixture of surface (rSAG1) and secretory (rROP2, rROP4, rGRA4) T. gondii proteins the trivalent antigen cocktails adjuvanted with incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) were used for mice immunization.27,28 IFA is a water in oil emulsion and one of the most commonly used experimental adjuvants. It preferentially stimulates antibody producing-plasma cells, which results in predominant induction of Th2 immune response. Due to the crucial role of cellular mechanisms in controlling and limiting Toxoplasma infection, it would be desirable to enrich the rROP2+rROP4+rGRA4/SAG1 antigen composition in Th1-promoting immunopotentiators, instead of IFA. Different agents exhibiting adjuvant properties and boosting the cellular immune response have been selected for studies on the vaccine against toxoplasmosis. In the context of improving the effectiveness of the rROP2+rROP4+rGRA4/SAG1 vaccine, the most intriguing of them are monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), oligodeoxynucleotides containing unmethylated CpG motifs or cytokines like interleukin-12 (IL-12) and interleukin-18 (IL-18). Monophosphoryl lipid A is a Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) ligand belonging to the family of TLR agonists. The adjuvant system based on MPL absorbed to alum has been approved for human vaccination (Hepatitis B vaccine-Fendrix; Human Papillomavirus vaccine-Cervarix).46 Experiments with recombinant Toxoplasma proteins GRA2 and GRA6 formulated in MPL showed not only the efficacy of the studied antigens as future vaccine components but also confirmed the value of MPL in the development of the antigen-specific protective Th1 immune response.47 The other candidates able to improve the protective potential of the subunit vaccines are CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides. Similarly to MPL, they belong to the family of TLR agonists and are evaluated in clinical trials as adjuvant of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, malaria and cancer vaccines.46 Additionally, CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides have been successfully used as an adjuvant of an experimental vaccine against toxoplasmosis. The co-administration of T. gondii recombinant proteins ROP2 and GRA4 with this candidate adjuvant resulted in strong predominant Th1 response manifested as high IgG2a/IgG1 antibody ratio and increased synthesis of IFN-γ.48 The next promising adjuvants able to expand the vaccine induced-cellular mechanisms are cytokines such as IL-12 and IL-18. Both cytokines skew the immune response toward Th1 pattern and have been shown to be very efficient as components of the experimental anti-Toxoplasma subunit or DNA vaccines.49-51

The strategy of antigen delivery is also an important factor determining the effectiveness of vaccination. Most tested experimental vaccines against toxoplasmosis have been administered intradermally, subcutaneously or intramuscularly depending on the type of the vaccine, the subunit or DNA. Such immunization protocols usually led to the development of systemic immune mechanisms but did not elicit the synthesis of secretory IgA antibodies, which are produced by the cells of mucosal tissues and are responsible for defense within the mucosal surfaces. Stimulation of mucosal immune response seems to be favorable in the case of vaccines against pathogens interacting with host mucosae. Furthermore, the presence of immunocompetent recirculating B and T lymphocytes in the lamina propria of the epithelia creates a possibility of inducing an antigen-specific immune response in areas distant from the site of antigen delivery.52 The natural oral route of T. gondii infection suggests that mucosal administration of antigens is more adequate compared with subcutaneous immunization. Additionally, by promoting both local and systemic immune responses, mucosal vaccination could improve the immunogenic and protective potential of the studied vaccines. Intranasal immunization of mice with immunoaffinity-purified Toxoplasma SAG1 antigen,53 recombinant rROP2+rGRA5+rGRA7 proteins54 or DNA vaccine comprised of psag1+pmic455 proved that mucosal vaccination is a realistic strategy in immunoprophylaxis of toxoplasmosis. Each tested vaccine provided significant production of antigen-specific IgA and IgG antibodies and Th1-type cytokines. Moreover, the increase in cellular and humoral immune responses was correlated with a partial but substantial level of protection against chronic or acute T. gondii infection.

Another interesting and promising strategy developed in the last decade seems to be implementation of live attenuated microorganisms as vectors for delivery of Toxoplasma antigens. An attractive candidate adapted for this strategy is Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette Guerin (BCG), a vaccine strain providing protection against tuberculosis. This strain has been used for human immunization since 1921 and has a long-established safety profile. Moreover, BCG strain possesses an outstanding adjuvant activity related to its capability to penetrate host cells and replicate intracellularly and to the presence of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) recognized by host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) engaged in the stimulation of innate cellular immunity. Experiments performed by Supply et al.56 and Wang et al.57 with recombinant M. bovis BCG (rBCG) expressing T. gondii GRA1 (rBCG/GRA1) or ROP2 (rBCG/ROP2) antigen, respectively, revealed the ability of this strategy to induce anti-parasite antigen specific cellular immune response in immunized individuals. However, the immunogenic and protective efficacy of the rBCG/GRA1 vaccine was dependent on the immunized hosts. In contrast to rBCG/GRA1-vaccinated sheep, the immunized OF1 outbred mice did not generate specific humoral and cellular immune responses. On the other hand, vaccination of inbred BALB/c mice with rBCG/ROP2 provided the partial protection against intraperitoneal challenge with T. gondii RH strain. This protection was correlated with the production of antigen-specific IgG antibodies and the high level of Th1-type cytokines.

In our laboratory we have engineered a recombinant BCG strain expressing Toxoplasma ROP4 protein (unpublished data). The construct was based on an attB integrative vector pMV306 under control of a temperature inducible heat shock protein promoter (Phsp60), a starvation inducible promoter (PhspX) or an isoniazid inducible fatty acid synthetase promoter (Pfas2). In each construct ROP4 was tagged to a few N-terminal amino acids of mycobacterial acetamidase. Moreover, the Shine Dalgarno motif of the acetamidase gene was introduced in the front of ROP4. As estimated by western blot analysis with rabbit polyclonal anti-ROP4 antibodies, the highest stable, overproduction of the expected parasite protein was obtained in induced (at 45°C) as well as uninduced cells of rBCG carrying rop4 controlled by the Phsp60 promoter (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the ROP4 protein was also detectable under inducible conditions, the stationary phase of the temperature induced mycobacterial cells or the presence of isoniazid at a concentration of 2 μg/ml, in rBCG controlled by the PhspX or Pfas2 promoter, respectively. Preliminary studies aimed at determining the immunogenic potential of the engineered rBCG strains demonstrated that only M. bovis carrying rop4 gene controlled by the PhspX promoter induced in intraperitonealy vaccinated (2 × 107 bacilli/mouse)-C3H/HeJ mice a significant synthesis of the systemic antigen-specific IgG antibodies compared with their level noted in the sera of control animals immunized with the rBCG carrying an empty vector or a parental vaccine BCG strain. The rBCG strains described above are under further analysis in order to determine an exact optimal number of the bacteria used for immunization, an optimal route of delivery and a capability to induce cellular as well as humoral immune response in vaccinated laboratory animals.

graphic file with name bbug-3-358-g3.jpg

Figure 3. Experimental strategy and western blot analysis of the overproduction of T. gondii ROP4 protein in uninduced (ind -) and induced (ind +) recombinant M. bovis BCG cells carrying rop4 gene controlled by a promoter: Phsp60 (hsp60; lines 1,2), PhspX (hspX; lines 3,4) or Pfas2 (fas2; lines 5,6) compared with control M. bovis BCG cells with an empty vector pMV306 (306; line 7). Line 8 – molecular weight marker for SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. Abbreviations: multi cloning site, MCS; integrase, Int; kanamycine resistant gene, aph (KmR); antibody, Ab; rhoprty protein ROP4, ROP4; fusion protein carrying ROP4 and N-terminal part of Mycobacterium tuberculosis FabD protein.

Conclusions

The construction of an effective vaccine against toxoplasmosis is still an open issue. Despite numerous vaccination trials, only partial protection against acute and chronic T. gondii infection has been obtained. However, in some studies the high level of immunoprotection was noticed. One of the most crucial factors influencing the efficacy of vaccination against toxoplasmosis is inclusion of antigens specific for three infectious Toxoplasma life-stages required for the induction of long-lasting cellular and humoral immune responses accompanied by protective immunity, which is necessary for controlling the parasite growth in the infected host and for the successful elimination of the parasite. Then, further extensive investigations should be performed to develop improved tools for immunoprophylaxis of toxoplasmosis.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education for the financial support of our studies (grant no. N N302 3196 33).

Dziadek B, Gatkowska J, Brzostek A, Dziadek J, Dzitko K, Grzybowski M, Dlugonska H. Evaluation of three recombinant multi-antigenic vaccines composed of surface and secretory antigens of Toxoplasma gondii in murine models of experimental toxoplasmosis. Vaccine. 2011;29:821–30. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.11.002.

Dziadek B, Gatkowska J, Grzybowski M, Dziadek J, Dzitko K, Dlugonska H. Toxoplasma gondii: the vaccine potential of three trivalent antigen-cocktails composed of recombinant ROP2, ROP4, GRA4 and SAG1 proteins against chronic toxoplasmosis in BALB/c mice. Exp Parasitol. 2012;131:133–8. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.02.026.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.Kijlstra A, Jongert E. Control of the risk of human toxoplasmosis transmitted by meat. Int J Parasitol. 2008;38:1359–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tenter AM, Heckeroth AR, Weiss LM. Toxoplasma gondii: from animals to humans. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:1217–58. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00124-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Speer CA. Structures of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and sporozoites and biology and development of tissue cysts. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:267–99. doi: 10.1128/cmr.11.2.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Petersen E, Dubey JP. Biology of toxoplasmosis. In: Joynson DHM, Wreghitt TG, ed. Toxoplasmosis: A comprehensive clinical guide. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press 2001; 1-42. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Denkers EY, Gazzinelli RT. Regulation and function of T-cell-mediated immunity during Toxoplasma gondii infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:569–88. doi: 10.1128/cmr.11.4.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Miller CM, Boulter NR, Ikin RJ, Smith NC. The immunobiology of the innate response to Toxoplasma gondii. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39:23–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kang H, Remington JS, Suzuki Y. Decreased resistance of B cell-deficient mice to infection with Toxoplasma gondii despite unimpaired expression of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and inducible nitric oxide synthase. J Immunol. 2000;164:2629–34. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.5.2629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sayles PC, Gibson GW, Johnson LL. B cells are essential for vaccination-induced resistance to virulent Toxoplasma gondii. Infect Immun. 2000;68:1026–33. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.3.1026-1033.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sibley LD, Adams LB, Krahenbuhl JL. Macrophage interactions in toxoplasmosis. Res Immunol. 1993;144:38–40. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2494(05)80095-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hill D, Dubey JP. Toxoplasma gondii: transmission, diagnosis and prevention. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;8:634–40. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00485.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Buxton D, Innes EA. A commercial vaccine for ovine toxoplasmosis. Parasitology. 1995;110(Suppl):S11–6. doi: 10.1017/S003118200000144X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Innes EA, Bartley PM, Maley S, Katzer F, Buxton D. Veterinary vaccines against Toxoplasma gondii. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de. 2009;104:246–51. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762009000200018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jongert E, Roberts CW, Gargano N, Förster-Wald E, Petersen E. Vaccines against Toxoplasma gondii: challenges and opportunities. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de. 2009;104:252–66. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762009000200019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wilson ME, Britigan BE. Iron acquisition by parasitic protozoa. Parasitol Today. 1998;14:348–53. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4758(98)01294-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dziadek B, Dziadek J, Dlugonska H. Identification of Toxoplasma gondii proteins binding human lactoferrin: a new aspect of rhoptry proteins function. Exp Parasitol. 2007;115:277–82. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2006.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.El Hajj H, Demey E, Poncet J, Lebrun M, Wu B, Galéotti N, et al. The ROP2 family of Toxoplasma gondii rhoptry proteins: proteomic and genomic characterization and molecular modeling. Proteomics. 2006;6:5773–84. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200600187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sadak A, Taghy Z, Fortier B, Dubremetz JF. Characterization of a family of rhoptry proteins of Toxoplasma gondii. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1988;29:203–11. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(88)90075-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Boothroyd JC, Dubremetz JF. Kiss and spit: the dual roles of Toxoplasma rhoptries. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:79–88. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dubremetz JF. Rhoptries are major players in Toxoplasma gondii invasion and host cell interaction. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:841–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00909.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chardès T, Bourguin I, Mevelec MN, Dubremetz JF, Bout D. Antibody responses to Toxoplasma gondii in sera, intestinal secretions, and milk from orally infected mice and characterization of target antigens. Infect Immun. 1990;58:1240–6. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.5.1240-1246.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Martin V, Arcavi M, Santillan G, Amendoeira MRR, De Souza Neves E, Griemberg G, et al. Detection of human Toxoplasma-specific immunoglobulins A, M, and G with a recombinant Toxoplasma gondii rop2 protein. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1998;5:627–31. doi: 10.1128/cdli.5.5.627-631.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Saavedra R, de Meuter F, Decourt JL, Hérion P. Human T cell clone identifies a potentially protective 54-kDa protein antigen of Toxoplasma gondii cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. J Immunol. 1991;147:1975–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Saavedra R, Becerril MA, Dubeaux C, Lippens R, De Vos MJ, Hérion P, et al. Epitopes recognized by human T lymphocytes in the ROP2 protein antigen of Toxoplasma gondii. Infect Immun. 1996;64:3858–62. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.9.3858-3862.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dziadek B, Gatkowska J, Brzostek A, Dziadek J, Dzitko K, Dlugonska H. Toxoplasma gondii: the immunogenic and protective efficacy of recombinant ROP2 and ROP4 rhoptry proteins in murine experimental toxoplasmosis. Exp Parasitol. 2009;123:81–9. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lekutis C, Ferguson DJP, Grigg ME, Camps M, Boothroyd JC. Surface antigens of Toxoplasma gondii: variations on a theme. Int J Parasitol. 2001;31:1285–92. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00261-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mercier C, Adjogble KDZ, Däubener W, Delauw MF. Dense granules: are they key organelles to help understand the parasitophorous vacuole of all apicomplexa parasites? Int J Parasitol. 2005;35:829–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dziadek B, Gatkowska J, Brzostek A, Dziadek J, Dzitko K, Grzybowski M, et al. Evaluation of three recombinant multi-antigenic vaccines composed of surface and secretory antigens of Toxoplasma gondii in murine models of experimental toxoplasmosis. Vaccine. 2011;29:821–30. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dziadek B, Gatkowska J, Grzybowski M, Dziadek J, Dzitko K, Dlugonska H. Toxoplasma gondii: the vaccine potential of three trivalent antigen-cocktails composed of recombinant ROP2, ROP4, GRA4 and SAG1 proteins against chronic toxoplasmosis in BALB/c mice. Exp Parasitol. 2012;131:133–8. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.David Sibley L. Recent origins among ancient parasites. Vet Parasitol. 2003;115:185–98. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00206-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wreghitt TG, Joynson DHM. Toxoplasma infection in immunosuppressed (HIV-negative) patients. In: Joynson DHM, Wreghitt TG, ed. Toxoplasmosis: A comprehensive clinical guide. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press 2001; 178-92. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Besteiro S, Dubremetz JF, Lebrun M. The moving junction of apicomplexan parasites: a key structure for invasion. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13:797–805. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01597.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang H, Compaore MK, Lee EG, Liao M, Zhang G, Sugimoto C, et al. Apical membrane antigen 1 is a cross-reactive antigen between Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii, and the anti-NcAMA1 antibody inhibits host cell invasion by both parasites. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2007;151:205–12. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mital J, Meissner M, Soldati D, Ward GE. Conditional expression of Toxoplasma gondii apical membrane antigen-1 (TgAMA1) demonstrates that TgAMA1 plays a critical role in host cell invasion. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:4341–9. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-04-0281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dautu G, Munyaka B, Carmen G, Zhang G, Omata Y, Xuenan X, et al. Toxoplasma gondii: DNA vaccination with genes encoding antigens MIC2, M2AP, AMA1 and BAG1 and evaluation of their immunogenic potential. Exp Parasitol. 2007;116:273–82. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2007.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Beghetto E, Nielsen HV, Del Porto P, Buffolano W, Guglietta S, Felici F, et al. A combination of antigenic regions of Toxoplasma gondii microneme proteins induces protective immunity against oral infection with parasite cysts. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:637–45. doi: 10.1086/427660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Peng GH, Yuan ZG, Zhou DH, He XH, Liu MM, Yan C, et al. Toxoplasma gondii microneme protein 6 (MIC6) is a potential vaccine candidate against toxoplasmosis in mice. Vaccine. 2009;27:6570–4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu MM, Yuan ZG, Peng GH, Zhou DH, He XH, Yan C, et al. Toxoplasma gondii microneme protein 8 (MIC8) is a potential vaccine candidate against toxoplasmosis. Parasitol Res. 2010;106:1079–84. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-1742-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lourenço EV, Bernardes ES, Silva NM, Mineo JR, Panunto-Castelo A, Roque-Barreira MC. Immunization with MIC1 and MIC4 induces protective immunity against Toxoplasma gondii. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:1244–51. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ismael AB, Sekkai D, Collin C, Bout D, Mévélec MN. The MIC3 gene of Toxoplasma gondii is a novel potent vaccine candidate against toxoplasmosis. Infect Immun. 2003;71:6222–8. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.11.6222-6228.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xiang W, Qiong Z, Li-peng L, Kui T, Jian-wu G, Heng-ping S. The location of invasion-related protein MIC3 of Toxoplasma gondii and protective effect of its DNA vaccine in mice. Vet Parasitol. 2009;166:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nie H, Fang R, Xiong BQ, Wang LX, Hu M, Zhou YQ, et al. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of two recombinant pseudorabies viruses expressing Toxoplasma gondii SAG1 and MIC3 proteins. Vet Parasitol. 2011;181:215–21. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cérède O, Dubremetz JF, Soête M, Deslée D, Vial H, Bout D, et al. Synergistic role of micronemal proteins in Toxoplasma gondii virulence. J Exp Med. 2005;201:453–63. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Huynh MH, Carruthers VB. Toxoplasma MIC2 is a major determinant of invasion and virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e84. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kessler H, Herm-Götz A, Hegge S, Rauch M, Soldati-Favre D, Frischknecht F, et al. Microneme protein 8--a new essential invasion factor in Toxoplasma gondii. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:947–56. doi: 10.1242/jcs.022350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rashid I, Hedhli D, Moiré N, Pierre J, Debierre-Grockiego F, Dimier-Poisson I, et al. Immunological responses induced by a DNA vaccine expressing RON4 and by immunogenic recombinant protein RON4 failed to protect mice against chronic toxoplasmosis. Vaccine. 2011;29:8838–46. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mbow ML, De Gregorio E, Valiante NM, Rappuoli R. New adjuvants for human vaccines. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010;22:411–6. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Golkar M, Shokrgozar MA, Rafati S, Musset K, Assmar M, Sadaie R, et al. Evaluation of protective effect of recombinant dense granule antigens GRA2 and GRA6 formulated in monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) adjuvant against Toxoplasma chronic infection in mice. Vaccine. 2007;25:4301–11. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.02.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sánchez VR, Pitkowski MN, Fernández Cuppari AV, Rodríguez FM, Fenoy IM, Frank FM, et al. Combination of CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides with recombinant ROP2 or GRA4 proteins induces protective immunity against Toxoplasma gondii infection. Exp Parasitol. 2011;128:448–53. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Letscher-Bru V, Villard O, Risse B, Zauke M, Klein JP, Kien TT. Protective effect of vaccination with a combination of recombinant surface antigen 1 and interleukin-12 against toxoplasmosis in mice. Infect Immun. 1998;66:4503–6. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.9.4503-4506.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang J, He S, Jiang H, Yang T, Cong H, Zhou H, et al. Evaluation of the immune response induced by multiantigenic DNA vaccine encoding SAG1 and ROP2 of Toxoplasma gondii and the adjuvant properties of murine interleukin-12 plasmid in BALB/c mice. Parasitol Res. 2007;101:331–8. doi: 10.1007/s00436-007-0465-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liu Q, Shang L, Jin H, Wei F, Zhu XQ, Gao H. The protective effect of a Toxoplasma gondii SAG1 plasmid DNA vaccine in mice is enhanced with IL-18. Res Vet Sci. 2010;89:93–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.De Magistris MT. Mucosal delivery of vaccine antigens and its advantages in pediatrics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58:52–67. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bonenfant C, Dimier-Poisson I, Velge-Roussel F, Buzoni-Gatel D, Del Giudice G, Rappuoli R, et al. Intranasal immunization with SAG1 and nontoxic mutant heat-labile enterotoxins protects mice against Toxoplasma gondii. Infect Immun. 2001;69:1605–12. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1605-1612.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Igarashi M, Kano F, Tamekuni K, Machado RZ, Navarro IT, Vidotto O, et al. Toxoplasma gondii: evaluation of an intranasal vaccine using recombinant proteins against brain cyst formation in BALB/c mice. Exp Parasitol. 2008;118:386–92. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2007.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang H, He S, Yao Y, Cong H, Zhao H, Li T, et al. Toxoplasma gondii: protective effect of an intranasal SAG1 and MIC4 DNA vaccine in mice. Exp Parasitol. 2009;122:226–32. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Supply P, Sutton P, Coughlan SN, Bilo K, Saman E, Trees AJ, et al. Immunogenicity of recombinant BCG producing the GRA1 antigen from Toxoplasma gondii. Vaccine. 1999;17:705–14. doi: 10.1016/S0264-410X(98)00255-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang H, Liu Q, Liu K, Zhong W, Gao S, Jiang L, et al. Immune response induced by recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG expressing ROP2 gene of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitol Int. 2007;56:263–8. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2007.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bioengineered are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES