Abstract
The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires remodeling of the local chromatin architecture to allow the repair machinery to access sites of damage. Here, we report that the histone variant macroH2A1.1 is recruited to DSBs. Cells lacking macroH2A1 have defective recruitment of 53BP1, defective activation of chk2 kinase and increased radiosensitivity. Importantly, macroH2A1.1 is not incorporated into nucleosomes at DSBs, but instead associates with the chromatin through a mechanism which requires PARP1 activity. These results reveal an unusual mechanism involving a direct association of macroH2A1.1 with PARylated chromatin which is critical for retaining 53BP1 at sites of damage.
Keywords: DNA repair, macroH2A1, ionizing radiation, 53BP1, nucleosome
1. Introduction
The repair of DSBs is a complex process involving activation of the ATM kinase and loading of DNA repair proteins onto the chromatin at the site of damage. Consequently, DSB repair requires significant remodeling of the chromatin to facilitate access to sites of DNA damage and to promote processing and repair of the DNA [1,2]. This reorganization of the chromatin landscape involves both chromatin remodeling ATPases [1,3] as well as histone modification, including acetylation of histone H4 by the Tip60 acetyltransferase [3,4] and ubiquitination of the chromatin by the RNF8 and RNF168 ubiquitin ligases [5]. These modifications function together to create open chromatin structures at sites of damage and to provide binding sites to recruit the brca1 complex and other proteins involved in DSB repair [2].
In addition to histone modification, chromatin structure may be regulated by the exchange of histone variants onto nucleosomes [6]. macroH2A1 is a H2A variant originally identified as a component of the inactive X-chromosome but which also controls gene expression, heterochromatin formation and cell cycle progression [7,8]. macroH2A contains a large globular macrodomain at the c-terminal which may function to bind PAR and associated metabolites [9]. PAR is a post-translational modification created at DNA strand breaks by the PARP1 enzyme [10,11]. Several macrodomain containing proteins, including Alc1, are recruited to sites of DNA damage through interaction between their macrodomains and PAR on the chromatin [9,12,13]. Macrodomains therefore represent a potential module for the PARP1 dependent loading of DNA repair proteins at sites of DNA damage [9]. Here, we examined the role of macroH2A1 in regulating chromatin structure during DSB repair.
2. Materials and methods
Cells
Culture of U2OS, HeLa and 293T cells and irradiation are described in [3,14,15]. Lentiviral shRNA plasmids targeting mH2A1 (CCAGTTACTTCGTGTCTACAA; Broad Institute, Cambridge MA) were transfected as in [16]. HeLa cells expressing the NHEJ reporter [17] were transfected with I-SceI using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, CA) and GFP positive cells counted using a BD FACscan cell analyzer with the Flow Jo software package. For clonogenic cell survival, cells were plated in triplicate, irradiated and allowed to recover for 10–14 days. Cells were fixed and stained with crystal violet and colonies with >50 cells were scored visually as previously described [14]. Surviving fraction was calculated as [Colonies + IR]/[Colonies − IR] for each individual cell line.
ChIP assays
293T cells were transfected with p84-ZFN as described [3]. ChIP utilized the SimpleChIP™ Enzymatic Chromatin IP Kit (Cell Signaling Technology, MA) described in [3]. Cells were fixed in formaldehyde (1%), lyzed in ChIP buffer and sonicated (Fisher Scientific Sonic 250). Input DNA was digested with proteinase K and quantitated by RT-qPCR. Sonicated chromatin was incubated with primary antibody (2 hours at 4°C), followed by protein G agarose beads precoated with sperm DNA. Following washing in low and high salt ChIP buffers, samples were eluted, incubated in NaCl (65°C for 2 hrs) and digested with proteinase K. DNA was quantitated by RT-qPCR using the StepOnePlus real time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, CA). Primers and amplification procedures are in supplementary methods.
Western blot analysis
Cells were lyzed in 100mM Tris pH6.8, 20% Glycerol, 200mM DTT, 4% SDS, 0.01%. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by western blot. Antibodies are listed in supplementary methods.
Immunofluorescence analysis
Cells were cultured on cover slips, irradiated, washed in PBS and fixed in PBS containing paraformaldehyde (2%). Subsequently, cells were blocked with serum (2%) and permeabilized in Bovine Serum Albumen (0.2%) containing saponin (0.2%) for 10min. Following incubation with primary antibody for 1h, cells were washed and incubated with secondary antibody for 1h. Slides were mounted with Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech, AL) and images collected with a Zeiss AxioImager Z1 microscope equipped with an Axiocam MRc Rev.3 Color Digital Camera and a Plan APO 63X/1.4 oil M27 lens (magnification 63X, aperture 1.4). Image processing was carried out with the Zeiss AxioVision software package (Zeiss Imaging, NY). Images were obtained for at least 100 cells per experimental point. Cells were visually inspected, with nuclei containing >5 foci scored as positive. All samples were examined by 2 independent workers to eliminate bias.
3. Results
mH2A1 encodes 2 splice variants, mH2A1.1 and mH2A1.2 [7]. These splice variants differ in that mH2A1.1 contains a functional macrodomain whereas mH2A1.2 is deficient in binding of ADP-ribose [9]. We identified a single shRNA which targeted both splice variants and depleted both mH2A1.1 and mH2A1.2 protein (figure 1A). Because the antibody does not distinguish mH2A1.1 and mH2A1.2, we also measured mRNA levels to ensure both isoforms were depleted by the shRNA (figure 1B). To determine how mH2A1.1 and mH2A1.2 (referred to as mH2A1 hereafter) impact DNA repair, we examined sensitivity to IR, which creates DNA strand breaks, and MMS, which methylates DNA. Depletion of mH2A1 increased sensitivity to both IR (figure 1C) and MMS (figure 1D), indicating a role for mH2A1 in the DSB and base excision repair pathways. To detail how mH2A1 contributes to DSB repair, we used a GFP based reporter system [17] to monitor NHEJ activity. Loss of mH2A1 led to a significant increase in NHEJ activity (figure 1E), indicating that mH2A1 may function to restrain NHEJ.
Next, we examined how loss of mH2A1 recruitment impacted the cells response to DSBs. The kinetics of H2AX phosphorylation were relatively unaltered in mH2A1 depleted cells (figure 2A; supplementary figure 1A), although there was a statistically significant reduction in γH2AX levels at 30 minutes. However, activation of ATM (figure 2B) and the recruitment of the rad51 protein (supplementary figure 1B) to DSBs were not affected by loss of mH2A1. Recruitment of mH2A1 to DSBs does not, therefore, impact the early signaling events activated in response to DSBs. We also examined 53BP1, a DSB repair protein which plays an essential role in regulating NHEJ [18,19] and is important for modulating the ability of ATM to phosphorylate its target proteins [20,21]. Surprisingly, cells lacking mH2A1 displayed a significant inhibition of 53BP1 accumulation (figure 2C; supplementary figure 1A), implicating mH2A1 in recruitment of 53BP1 at DSBs. 53BP1 is important for the ATMdependent phosphorylation of the chk2 kinase [20,21]. Significantly, phosphorylation of chk2 was impaired in the absence of mH2A1 (figure 2D), despite the observation that ATM’s intrinsic kinase activity was unaltered by mH2A1 depletion (figure 2B). This is consistent with impaired recruitment of 53BP1 in the absence of mH2A1 leading to a defect in the 53BP1-mediated phosphorylation of chk2 by the ATM kinase.
Histone variants such as mH2A1 can be exchanged onto nucleosomes [7], suggesting that mH2A1 may be exchanged onto chromatin in response to DSBs. To explore this hypothesis, we used a designer zinc finger nuclease to create a targeted DSB [22]. p84-ZFN creates a single DSB on chromosome 19 and evokes a DSB damage response which can be monitored using standard ChIP techniques [3]. To analyze mH2A1 by ChIP, we first established stable cell lines expressing tagged myc-HA-mH2A1.1 or myc-HA-mH2A1.2 (figure 3A). ChIP using γH2AX antibody demonstrated that DSBs created by p84-ZFN create γH2AX domains which extend at least 200kb from the break (figure 3B). Further, ChIP analysis revealed that HA-mH2A1.1 accumulated at the DSB (figure 3C), forming domains which were contiguous with those for γH2AX (figure 3B). However, ChIP analysis failed to detect any significant accumulation of mH2A1.2 at the DSB (figure 3D), indicating that only the mH2A1.1 splice variant is recruited to sites of damage.
Recruitment of mH2A1.1 to DSBs could reflect either exchange of mH2A1.1 onto nucleosomes or increased association of mH2A1.1 with the damaged chromatin. During ChIP, chromatin-associated proteins require cross-linking to nucleosomes to allow immunoprecipitation of the protein-DNA complex, whereas histones, which are integral components of the nucleosome, do not require crosslinking. Figure 4A demonstrates that γH2AX, an integral component of nucleosomes, was readily detected by ChIP in both the presence and absence of cross-linking. In contrast, recruitment of the DNA damage response protein Ku70 to DSBs was significantly decreased without prior cross-linking, consistent with Ku70 interacting with the DNA ends at DSBs. Importantly, mH2A1.1 recruitment to DSBs was significantly reduced in the absence of cross-linking (figure 4A), implying that mH2A1.1 is recruited to DSBs but is not exchanged onto the nucleosomes. Because the mH2A1.1 splice variant contains the PAR binding macrodomain [7], we examined if recruitment of mH2A1.1 required interaction with PAR, which is generated by PARP1 at DNA strand breaks [11]. The PARP inhibitor AZD2281 blocked recruitment of mH2A1.1 to the chromatin both adjacent to the DSB and at more distant sites (figure 4B). This is consistent with mH2A1.1 recruitment to DSBs occurring through interaction of its macrodomain with PAR sites at the DSB. Further, figure 4 indicates that mH2A1.1 is not stably incorporated into nucleosomes at DSBs.
4. Discussion
Here, we demonstrate that mH2A1 plays a central role in the DSB repair pathway. Although mH2A1 has 2 splice variants, only the mH2A1.1 variant, which contains the PAR-binding macrodomain [9,11], was recruited to DSBs. Further, mH2A1.1 was not exchanged onto nucleosomes at the DSB. Instead, retention of mH2A1.1 required PARP1 activity, implying that mH2A1.1 is recruited to DSBs through a unique mechanism involving interaction between mH2A1.1 and PAR chains created by PARP1 at DSBs [11]. This is consistent with other studies demonstrating that recombinant macrodomain modules [9] and the ALC1 remodeling complex are localized to sites of DNA damage through interaction with PAR [13].
Loss of mH2A1 led to an increase in radiosensitivity, indicating a defect in DSB repair. However, we also observed an increase in NHEJ activity and a delay in the recruitment of 53BP1 to breaks in the absence of mH2A1. 53BP1 has been implicated in regulating NHEJ through its role in mediating long range interactions required for end-joining [19] and to function as an inhibitor of homologous recombination [18]. However, the role of 53BP1 in NHEJ is poorly defined, and the current work does not allow us to determine if the increased NHEJ activity in mH2A1-deficient is due to the observed delay in 53BP1 loading, or arises through disruption of other mH2A1 dependent pathways which regulate NHEJ. Nevertheless, loss of mH2A1 did lead to a significant defect in the 53BP1-dependent phosphorylation of the chk2 kinase by ATM [20,21], consistent with a key role for mH2A1 in regulating the functional activity of 53BP1.
Recruitment of mH2A1.1 to DSBs may have several potential impacts on the DNA damage response. 53BP1 recruitment requires both chromatin ubiquitination by the RNF8/RNF168 ubiquitin ligases [23] and interaction of 53BP1 with histone H4 di-methylated on lysine 20 [24]. Interaction of mH2A1.1 with PAR sites may therefore promote changes in chromatin structure and/or post-translational modification which can facilitate both 53BP1 loading and DSB repair. Further, mH2A1.1 can inhibit PARP1 activity [25,26], suggesting that mH2A1.1 may inhibit PARP1 and limit chromatin PARylation. Controlling PARP1 activity is critical, since excessive PARylation can deplete NAD+ and energy pools, leading to cell death [11]. Recruitment of mH2A1.1 may therefore also provide a mechanism for sensing the concentration of PAR in the cell and provide a regulatory framework to control PARP1 activity and PAR levels during DNA repair.
In conclusion, our work demonstrates that recruitment of mH2A1.1 to sites of damage without its subsequent exchange onto nucleosomes plays a critical role in DSB repair and 53BP1 function. Further, this work underscores the importance of macrodomains and PARylation of the chromatin in the detection and repair of DSBs.
Supplementary Material
Highlights.
mH2A1 is required for the repair of DSBs.
mH2A1.1 is recruited to DSBs through a mechanism involving PARP1.
mH2A1.1 is not incorporated into nucleosomes at DSBs.
mH2A1 is required for loading of 53BP1 at DSBs.
Acknowledgements
We thank J Stark for NHEJ reporter cells and B Chadwick for mH2A1.1 and mH2A1.2 plasmids. Supported by grants from the NCI (CA64585 and CA93602) to BDP.
Abbreviations
- ChIP
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
- BER
base excision repair
- DSB
DNA double-strand break
- HR
homologous recombination
- mH2A1
macroH2A1
- IF
Immunofluorescence
- IR
Ionizing Radiation
- MMS
methylmethane sulfonate
- MRN
Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1
- NHEJ
Non-homologous end-joining
- PAR
poly-ADP-ribose
- PBS
phosphate buffered saline
- RT-qPCR
Real Time quantitative PCR
- ZFN
Zinc Finger Nuclease
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Lukas J, Lukas C, Bartek J. More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance. Nature cell biology. 2011;13:1161–1169. doi: 10.1038/ncb2344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Xu Y, Price BD. Chromatin dynamics and the repair of DNA double strand breaks. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:261–267. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.2.14543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xu Y, Sun Y, Jiang X, Ayrapetov MK, Moskwa P, Yang S, Weinstock DM, Price BD. The p400 ATPase regulates nucleosome stability and chromatin ubiquitination during DNA repair. J Cell Biol. 2010;191:31–43. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201001160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Murr R, Loizou JI, Yang YG, Cuenin C, Li H, Wang ZQ, Herceg Z. Histone acetylation by Trrap-Tip60 modulates loading of repair proteins and repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:91–99. doi: 10.1038/ncb1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Messick TE, Greenberg RA. The ubiquitin landscape at DNA double-strand breaks. The Journal of cell biology. 2009;187:319–326. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200908074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Talbert PB, Henikoff S. Histone variants--ancient wrap artists of the epigenome. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:264–275. doi: 10.1038/nrm2861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gamble MJ, Kraus WL. Multiple facets of the unique histone variant macroH2A: from genomics to cell biology. Cell cycle. 2010;9:2568–2574. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.13.12144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gamble MJ, Frizzell KM, Yang C, Krishnakumar R, Kraus WL. The histone variant macroH2A1 marks repressed autosomal chromatin, but protects a subset of its target genes from silencing. Genes & development. 2010;24:21–32. doi: 10.1101/gad.1876110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Timinszky G, et al. A macrodomain-containing histone rearranges chromatin upon sensing PARP1 activation. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2009;16:923–929. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lord CJ, Ashworth A. The DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Nature. 2012;481:287–294. doi: 10.1038/nature10760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rouleau M, Patel A, Hendzel MJ, Kaufmann SH, Poirier GG. PARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond. Nature reviews. Cancer. 2010;10:293–301. doi: 10.1038/nrc2812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gottschalk AJ, et al. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation directs recruitment and activation of an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:13770–13774. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906920106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ahel D, et al. Poly(ADP-ribose)-dependent regulation of DNA repair by the chromatin remodeling enzyme ALC1. Science. 2009;325:1240–1243. doi: 10.1126/science.1177321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sun Y, Jiang X, Xu Y, Ayrapetov MK, Moreau LA, Whetstine JR, Price BD. Histone H3 methylation links DNA damage detection to activation of the tumour suppressor Tip60. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:1376–1382. doi: 10.1038/ncb1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jiang X, Sun Y, Chen S, Roy K, Price BD. The FATC domains of PIKK proteins are functionally equivalent and participate in the Tip60-dependent activation of DNA-PKcs and ATM. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:15741–15746. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M513172200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ayrapetov MK, Xu C, Sun Y, Zhu K, Parmar K, D'Andrea AD, Price BD. Activation of hif1alpha by the prolylhydroxylase inhibitor dimethyoxalyglycine decreases radiosensitivity. PloS one. 2011;6:e26064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bennardo N, Cheng A, Huang N, Stark JM. Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair. PLoS genetics. 2008;4 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000110. e1000110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bunting SF, et al. 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell. 2010;141:243–254. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dimitrova N, Chen YC, Spector DL, de Lange T. 53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility. Nature. 2008;456:524–528. doi: 10.1038/nature07433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shibata A, Barton O, Noon AT, Dahm K, Deckbar D, Goodarzi AA, Lobrich M, Jeggo PA. Role of ATM and the damage response mediator proteins 53BP1 and MDC1 in the maintenance of G(2)/M checkpoint arrest. Molecular and cellular biology. 2010;30:3371–3383. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01644-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang B, Matsuoka S, Carpenter PB, Elledge SJ. 53BP1, a mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint. Science. 2002;298:1435–1438. doi: 10.1126/science.1076182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Urnov FD, et al. Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nature. 2005;435:646–651. doi: 10.1038/nature03556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Panier S, Durocher D. Regulatory ubiquitylation in response to DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009;8:436–443. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pei H, et al. MMSET regulates histone H4K20 methylation and 53BP1 accumulation at DNA damage sites. Nature. 2011;470:124–128. doi: 10.1038/nature09658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nusinow DA, Hernandez-Munoz I, Fazzio TG, Shah GM, Kraus WL, Panning B. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 is inhibited by a histone H2A variant, MacroH2A, and contributes to silencing of the inactive X chromosome. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282:12851–12859. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610502200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ouararhni K, Hadj-Slimane R, Ait-Si-Ali S, Robin P, Mietton F, Harel-Bellan A, Dimitrov S, Hamiche A. The histone variant mH2A1.1 interferes with transcription by down-regulating PARP-1 enzymatic activity. Genes & development. 2006;20:3324–3336. doi: 10.1101/gad.396106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.