Skip to main content
Cambridge Open Access logoLink to Cambridge Open Access
. 2011 Nov 29;71(1):154–165. doi: 10.1017/S0029665111003338

Maternal nutritional status, C1 metabolism and offspring DNA methylation: a review of current evidence in human subjects

Paula Dominguez-Salas 1,2,*, Sharon E Cox 1, Andrew M Prentice 1,2, Branwen J Hennig 1, Sophie E Moore 2
PMCID: PMC3491641  PMID: 22124338

Abstract

Evidence is growing for the long-term effects of environmental factors during early-life on later disease susceptibility. It is believed that epigenetic mechanisms (changes in gene function not mediated by DNA sequence alteration), particularly DNA methylation, play a role in these processes. This paper reviews the current state of knowledge of the involvement of C1 metabolism and methyl donors and cofactors in maternal diet-induced DNA methylation changes in utero as an epigenetic mechanism. Methyl groups for DNA methylation are mostly derived from the diet and supplied through C1 metabolism by way of choline, betaine, methionine or folate, with involvement of riboflavin and vitamins B6 and B12 as cofactors. Mouse models have shown that epigenetic features, for example DNA methylation, can be altered by periconceptional nutritional interventions such as folate supplementation, thereby changing offspring phenotype. Evidence of early nutrient-induced epigenetic change in human subjects is scant, but it is known that during pregnancy C1 metabolism has to cope with high fetal demands for folate and choline needed for neural tube closure and normal development. Retrospective studies investigating the effect of famine or season during pregnancy indicate that variation in early environmental exposure in utero leads to differences in DNA methylation of offspring. This may affect gene expression in the offspring. Further research is needed to examine the real impact of maternal nutrient availability on DNA methylation in the developing fetus.

Keywords: DNA methylation, C1 metabolism, DOHaD, Methyl donors


Abbreviations:

CpG

cytosine–guanidine

DOHaD

Developmental Origins of Health and Diseases

ME

metastable epialleles

SAH

S-adenosylhomocysteine

SAM

S-adenosyl-methionine

The ‘Developmental Origins of Health and Disease’ (DOHaD) hypothesis proposes not only that we are what we eat but also that we could be what our parents ate, and is a biologically and evolutionarily fascinating concept. The hypothesis postulates that early-life development is critically sensitive to inadequate nutrition and other environmental factors leading to permanent changes in metabolism that can alter susceptibility to complex diseases(1). These early-life exposures can thereby be recorded and archived in the ‘cellular memory’, by inducing persistent adaptations in cellular function(s) with long-term effects(2). Not only is this process of scientific importance, it also has relevance for public health, particularly in the framework of the twenty-first century pandemics of chronic diseases: the implication being that improvements in nutrition of one generation could prevent common complex diseases in future generations(3).

The foundations of the DOHaD theory were first formulated after Professor David Barker and colleagues from the MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit in Southampton (UK) studied retrospective data of geographical disease distribution and noticed that neonatal mortality was strongly associated with IHD rates in the UK(4). Almost 30 years on, evidence has been extensively documented for a wide number of complex diseases including hypertension(5), type 2 diabetes(6) and cancers(7). Yet, the mechanisms involved have not been fully elucidated.

This review discusses the current state of evidence that DNA methylation may be an important mediator of fetal programming in response to alterations in maternal diet and nutritional status during pregnancy, thus affecting later phenotypic outcomes.

The case for DNA methylation

The capacity for developmental plasticity likely requires many mechanisms to interact and current evidence suggests epigenetic mechanisms play an important role in this process(8). Epigenetics refers to a number of mechanisms (namely DNA methylation, histone modification and RNA-related epigenetic marks) that establish layers of information in addition to DNA sequence information. They result in the ‘epigenome’ and lead to mitotically (and sometimes meiotically) replicable changes in gene expression potential that are not mediated by DNA sequence alteration(8). These epigenetic mechanisms ‘crosstalk’ in an orchestrated manner to regulate gene expression throughout life(9).

Of all the epigenetic mechanisms so far described, DNA methylation is possibly the best characterised (Fig. 1). This process involves the covalent addition of a methyl group (CH3) to the 5′ position of the pyrimidine ring of the cytosine base within cytosine–guanidine (CpG) dinucleotides, converting cytosine to 5-methylcytosine. This chemical modification alters the physical structure of the DNA, preventing DNA-binding proteins access during transcription processes, ultimately silencing the affected gene(10). CpG are typically methylated. However, gene promoters contain CpG-rich DNA areas called ‘CpG islands’, which are usually unmethylated, highlighting the importance of DNA methylation in the regulation of gene expression(10,11). Gene promoters are regulatory regions that contain transcription-factor binding sites to facilitate the transcription of the gene. Methylation in these regions acts as a gene expression-regulator switch, and thus can ultimately lead to phenotypic differences(12).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

DNA methylation.

DNA methylation is catalysed by a number of DNA methyltransferases. The specific details of how these enzymes operate are unclear, but it is generally accepted that DNA methyltransferases 3a and 3b are mainly involved in de novo establishment of methylation patterns, whereas subsequent maintenance is guaranteed by different DNA methyltransferase 1 variants(13). The role of DNA methyltransferase 2 remains undetermined(14).

For any mechanism to be a realistic candidate underlying the DOHaD hypothesis some premises should be met. It should be a molecular mechanism taking an active part in both prenatal development and the onset of a given disease. It should also be sensitive to environmental factors but have the ability to be stable over time. DNA methylation, as discussed in this review, meets these requirements.

Establishment of DNA methylation

Embryogenesis has been identified as a critical window in the establishment of the epigenome(8). Gamete genomes are highly methylated when compared with somatic cells(11). However, upon fertilisation, the newly formed zygote undergoes global demethylation, followed by de novo genome-wide methylation after implantation. New methylation patterns are established from pluripotent cells in a lineage-specific manner, through changes in gene expression leading to differentiation of organs and tissues(8). The methylation patterns are perpetuated and propagated with high fidelity during rapid mitotic multiplication in fetal development(15). However, the rules for the establishment of these patterns and the sources of individual epigenetic variation are not fully understood. It is believed that there are some genetically led patterns(16), while others are essentially stochastic(17) (Fig. 2). Timing is clearly critical but in human subjects the details remain largely undefined.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Sources of individual epigenetic variation.

Classical examples of developmental DNA methylation are the X chromosome inactivation in women(18) and imprinting of genes (see box 1 in Fig. 1), such as the IGF2 gene, where the maternal allele is suppressed (imprinted), while the paternal allele is activated (expressed)(19,20). Imprinted genes play a critical role in regulation of placental and embryonic development, as well as in intrauterine growth and thus, early influences can have a substantial impact on human health later in life(10,21). Imprinting marks are not erased during early embryonic development(22). Misprogramming of the appropriate methylation patterns is associated with abnormal physical and mental development, including a number of ‘epigenetic’ developmental syndromes such as Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome(23,24).

Large-scale erasure of methylation marks during early development limits the possibility of transgenerational inheritance, but this may occur through epigenetic marks that have failed to be erased before implantation or via epigenetic marks in germ line cells(25). The vast majority of exposures alter only somatic cells but when epigenetic modifications occur in the germ line during embryonic gonadal sex determination, they become permanently programmed, and then the altered epigenome can appear in subsequent generations, in a sex-specific manner and in the absence of further environmental exposures(26,27).

Certain loci, known as metastable epialleles (ME), exist; their epigenetic state is independent of cell differentiation and they exhibit dynamic stochasticity(28). At ME, epigenotype is established in a probabilistic manner in the early embryo and maintained thereafter in the differentiated cell lineages. This can lead to permanent phenotypic consequences, even in genetically identical individuals(29), and ME are thought to be particularly vulnerable to transient environmental influences(30).

The epigenome, unlike the genome, can be modified in response to interactions with environmental conditions within a lifetime. The epigenotype affects an individual response to a particular environment, and likewise the environment has the potential to change the epigenetic landscape, contributing to plasticity of phenotypes(8). DNA methylation might explain how individuals can respond relatively quickly to changing external cues, such as deleterious compounds (e.g. tobacco or cooking smoke, arsenic or aflatoxins), infectious agents (e.g. Helicobacter pylori), or stress, either during development or throughout life(31,32). Early DNA methylation alterations during cell-lineage differentiation tend to be irreversible while some later changes can be reversed(33,34).

DNA methylation depends specifically upon supply of dietary methyl groups, which are necessary throughout life to establish methylation patterns and to maintain these during repeated cycles of cell proliferation(35). Once the epigenome is established, it is less responsive to external stimuli, but during early development, when tissue-specific patterns are undergoing establishment and maturation, the epigenome is sensitive to subtle changes(26). Maternal nutritional deficiency or excess may thus result in permanent DNA methylation abnormalities (hypo- or hypermethylation) with the potential to affect gene expression(12).

In contrast to other epigenetic mechanisms, such as transient histone modifications, DNA methylation marks are chemically very stable and can be retained over time, thus potentially explaining long-term consequences for health. However, the global level of DNA methylation is thought to change over time and deteriorate due to oxidative stress and aging(36).

The role of epigenetic dysregulation and particularly of DNA methylation in the development of human disease has been increasingly recognised. Aging in human subjects is known to be associated with global hypomethylation, resulting in aberrant gene activation and age-related diseases(37,38). Promoter-specific methylation has been associated with different diseases(39). The most convincing evidence has been observed in relation to carcinogenesis(40,41), but there is also growing evidence that epigenetic dysregulation affects other life-course diseases such as CVD(42), type 2 diabetes(43) and obesity(44).

Taken together, such evidence supports DNA methylation as a plausible interface between the prenatal and early postnatal environment and adult disease risk.

Confirmatory evidence in animal models

Much of what is known to date is based on findings from animal studies. Murine models have provided direct evidence linking early-life programming through nutritional exposures with DNA methylation-mediated changes in gene expression, and hence phenotype(29). Diets supplemented in methyl donors given to dams pre-conceptually and in pregnancy, can lead to permanent changes in gene regulation and to strong phenotypical modulation in the context of genetically identical inbred mice(45).

A classic example is the agouti viable yellow mouse, which has a yellow coat colour and is obese and hyperinsulinaemic(29). This is caused by a dominant mutation of the agouti locus, caused by the insertion of a so-called IAP (intracisternal A particle) repeat element, which acts as an alternative promoter(46). Such mobile elements render this genomic region epigenetically labile(29). When this promoter is hypomethylated, it leads to expression of the agouti gene that regulates the production of yellow pigment and other pleiotropic effects including obesity. When it is silenced by methylation, the synthesis of yellow pigment is down-regulated and a pseudoagouti coat colour (darker) is produced(29). Maternal methyl-donor supplementation (e.g. with folic acid, vitamin B12, or betaine(45)) was confirmed to cause hypermethylation of the agouti viable yellow gene in the offspring, affecting offspring phenotype in a dose-dependent fashion. This genetic locus is considered an ME where methylation patterns are established stochastically within litter mates. Therefore, offspring present with a range of methylation at this locus and consequently variation in phenotypes, ranging from obese hyperinsulinaemic yellow, heavily to slightly yellow mottled and leaner non-hyperinsulinaemic pseudoagouti phenotypes. Other examples are known, such as the Axin fused gene that has a similar epigenetic behaviour, either leading to the expression or not of a kinked tail(47,48). Furthermore, epigenetic transgenerational inheritance has been observed at ME in mice(49,50).

Research has also been conducted in sheep(51). Ewes with restricted dietary methyl donors at physiological ranges, starting 8 weeks prior to conception until 6 d after conception, showed no effects in pregnancy establishment. However, offspring, and especially male descendants, had low weight at birth and were heavier and fatter in adulthood. They also had altered immune responses, were insulin resistant and had elevated blood pressure. Liver DNA methylation assessment showed altered widespread methylation status, in 4% of 1400 CpG islands examined. More than half of the affected loci were specific to males.

These animal models confirm the biological plausibility discussed earlier, and make it reasonable to think that similar processes could operate in human subjects.

Supply of methyl groups for DNA methylation

Methyl groups for fetal DNA methylation and development are provided through C1 metabolism(52). Pregnancy and lactation are times when methyl-donor supply is critical and demand for nutrients is higher(35). The transfer of methyl groups depends ultimately on the availability of S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM). This is derived from methionine, which is converted through the action of methyltransferases to S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), while splicing off a methyl group and subsequently to homocysteine (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(Color online) Diagram of C1 metabolism. Methyl donors are shown in orange, functional biomarkers in green and cofactors are encircled. SAM, S-adenosyl-methionine; SAH, S-adenosylhomocysteine; DMG, dimethylglycine.

C1 metabolism is characterised by a redundancy of pathways to conserve methionine that guarantees methyl-group availability, while removing unwanted homocysteine excess out of the system(53). Two complementary remethylation pathways, one folate dependent, the other folate independent, intersect at the methionine cycle for the transformation of homocysteine into methionine. In the folate-dependent pathway, tetrahydrofolate is reduced to methyltetrahydrofolate by methyltetrahydrofolate reductase, with the intervention of riboflavin. Vitamin B12 catalyses the C1 unit transfer from methyltetrahydrofolate to methionine by methionine synthase. The alternative folate-independent pathway is catalysed by the enzyme betaine homocysteine methyltransferase using betaine direct from the diet or from choline. In addition, homocysteine can be transformed into cysteine in certain tissues (liver, kidneys, pancreas, intestine and brain) by irreversible transsulphuration, in a process that requires vitamin B6.

Clear interdependence exists between these two pathways, and perturbing the metabolism of any of the individual elements results in compensatory mechanisms via the alternative pathway(54) or in elevated plasma homocysteine concentrations(55,56). The specific functioning of fetal C1 metabolism is difficult to study, although it has been reported that the activities of methyltetrahydrofolate reductase and methionine synthase in preterm infant tissues were higher than those full-term or young children(57). Therefore, prospective studies to investigate the role of maternal nutrition on the offspring DNA methylation need to be based on robust biomarkers for maternal C1 metabolism.

Functional biomarkers of methylation capacity

Homocysteine, SAM, SAH and dimethylglycine are of metabolic origin and usually a good reflection of the overall status, i.e. excess or deficiency of substrates and cofactors within the C1 metabolism(12,58). DNA methylation is dependent on the balance between the substrate supply (SAM) and removal of the product (SAH), which is a potent inhibitor of SAM-dependent methyltransferase activity(59) and thereby methylation by way of a negative feedback loop. Hence, the clearing of SAH is the key for adequate methylation. The SAM:SAH ratio, sometimes called the ‘methylation index’, can be used as an indicator of the methylation potential of an individual(12).

Methylation regulation enzymes are differentially expressed in human tissues, leading to tissue-specific C1 metabolism and thus tissue-specific homocysteine, SAM and SAH level regulation and methylation capacity(60). For this reason, plasma SAM:SAH must be interpreted with caution and systemic SAM:SAH is not necessarily a meaningful indicator of tissue-specific methylation potential. Furthermore, efficiency of SAM transmembrane transport into the cells appears to be low(61). Cells synthesise SAM from circulating methionine or homocysteine, as these cross the cell membrane easily. Thus, circulating homocysteine could be a better indicator of methylation potential(62). Only the kidney appears capable of taking up SAH directly from plasma(63). The transsulphuration of homocysteine to cysteine can alleviate SAM inhibition of methyltransferases(62).

Homocysteine is a non-protein-forming sulphur-containing amino acid that may exist free or bound to cysteine or albumin(64). Elevated homocysteine is a good and well-studied indicator of C1 metabolism disturbance and has consistently been associated with low concentrations of folate, vitamins B12 and B6, choline and betaine(6569). Conversely, a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials of folic acid supplementation showed an average 25% reduction in homocysteine levels(70).

The Hordaland homocysteine study showed that high homocysteine concentrations were associated with risks of pre-eclampsia, premature delivery and low birth weight(71). High homocysteine denoting aberrant methyl metabolism in utero is also linked with neural tube defects(72). Usually, values of 5–15 μmol/l are considered normal for plasma homocysteine concentration, although different cut-off values have been used to define elevated concentrations(58). There is a 30–60% decline in plasma homocysteine concentrations during pregnancy compared with non-pregnant women, due to various factors such as increased methionine requirements for fetal growth or changes in endocrine function(73,74).

Dimethylglycine is a by-product of choline–betaine metabolism, and also a derivative of glycine(75). Plasma dimethylglycine levels appear to be lower in pregnant than in non-pregnant women (by 28%), and higher in fetal (2·44 μmol/l, se 0·12) compared with maternal plasma (1·81 μmol/l, se 0·12) as shown in a Canadian study(75).

Methyl donors

Methyl-group donors (also known as lipotropes) are all diet derived(76). There is growing evidence that methyl donors are critical during pregnancy and that dietary excess or deficiency may have an impact on epigenetic programming in human subjects as in animals. Intake of folate and choline can be marginal during gestation and mismatch the biological requirements, leading to maternal depletion of stores and potentially to clinical deficiency(35). The interactions between methyl donors for biological methylation and homocysteine removal make it difficult to separate their individual impact when studying reproductive outcomes. Furthermore, each of these methyl donors has specific roles in fetal development.

Folate is a B-vitamin (vitamin B9), indispensable for the biosynthesis and repair of DNA and is a cofactor of numerous biochemical reactions(69). Folate functions as a coenzyme and is key in the transfer of methyl groups(58). Its function in normal neural tube closure in early gestation (21–28 d after conception in human subjects) has long been recognised(77). Maternal supplementation with folic acid is implemented almost universally for prevention(78) and in some countries diet fortification has also been successful in reducing the incidence of neural tube defects(79). In human subjects, maternal plasma folate is the main determinant of transplacental folate delivery to the fetus(80). Blood folate in the fetus is several-fold higher than in the mother, and active transport occurs through a placental folate receptor. Plasma concentrations of folate fluctuate according to recent intakes and thus may reflect the effect of temporary changes in diet; low levels maintained over time indicate low folate intake and chronic depletion(58). A cut-off point for deficiency of <7 nmol/l has been advised to prevent negative balance of folate(81), but higher levels above 16 nmol/l are required to reduce neural tube defects(82). Pregnancy is associated with an increase in the demands of folate for fetal and uteroplacental organ growth(80). Therefore, circulating folate concentrations decline during gestation in women who are not supplemented with folic acid(83), sometimes leading to overt folate deficiency. Furthermore, low folate in pregnant women does not appear to result in high plasma homocysteine suggesting effective homocysteine lowering mechanism(s) during pregnancy(84).

Choline is classified as part of the B-complex vitamins group, although it can be synthesised in the body from phosphatidylethanolamine. This de novo synthesis capacity, however, is limited(85). Most men and postmenopausal women deprived of dietary choline develop symptoms of deficiency, including fatty liver or muscle damage(56,86). Conversely, only about 44% of premenopausal women develop such problems in the absence of dietary choline because endogenous synthesis is upregulated by oestrogen(87). Choline is also involved in the closure of the neural tube(88,89). Most choline is oxidised by choline dehydrogenase to betaine to participate in C1 metabolism(90). Choline also has an important function later in pregnancy during neurogenesis of the fetal hippocampus, and deficiency of choline can have on visuospatial and auditory memory that persist in adulthood(91). Folate appears to contribute to later brain development like choline and deficiency of either diminishes neurogenesis and increases neural cell death in the fetal brain(92,93). Additionally, dietary choline can transform into acetylcholine for cholinergic neurotransmission, transmembrane signalling and lipid transport and metabolism or into phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin for cell membrane constitution and integrity(94).

Adequate levels of choline in plasma have not been defined as yet. Plasma choline has been reported to be up to 45% higher in pregnant compared to non-pregnant women(75,95) probably due to increased endogenous synthesis when oestrogen levels rise from 1 nmol/l to up to 60 nmol/l to support the higher demands(35). Large amounts of choline are delivered to the fetus across the placenta, through a specific transporter-like protein(96), which may deplete the maternal stores(97). Choline concentration in amniotic fluid is 10-fold greater than in maternal blood(98). It has been estimated that about 60% of methyl groups are derived from choline, 20% from methionine and 10–20% from folate(76), indicating a central role of choline as a methyl donor.

Betaine conversion from choline primarily takes place in the liver and kidney and is irreversible(94). Therefore, dietary betaine can potentially have a choline-sparing effect although not for all the functions of choline. Betaine is also an osmolyte that protects cells from environmental stress such as drought, high salinity or high temperatures(90). It permits water retention in cells, thus protecting them from dehydratation. Plasma betaine is highly variable, in women typically 20–60 μmol/l in resting conditions(99). Plasma betaine has been seen to decrease(75) in the first half of pregnancy, from 16·3 to 10·3 μmol/l and remains constant thereafter(100). High concentrations of betaine are found in neonates, presumably linked to the high fetal-choline levels(101).

Methionine is a sulphur-containing amino acid, indispensable because human subjects cannot fix inorganic sulphur into organic molecules(64). It is the precursor of cysteine. Cysteine cannot be used to synthesise methionine, but a derivative of cysteine, cystine, has a methionine-sparing effect and can replace approximately 70% of dietary requirements for methionine(102). It has been observed that women with higher methionine intakes are at lower risk for neural tube defect affected pregnancies, irrespective of folate intake(103).

Enzyme cofactors

The main enzymatic cofactors in the C1 metabolism cycle are the B-vitamins riboflavin, B6 and B12. These are essential and diet derived. They have all been shown to be associated with a reduction in neural tube-defect risk(104).

Riboflavin is an integral component of the coenzymes flavin mononucleotide and flavin-adenine dinucleotide; it catalyses numerous metabolic redox reactions, including energy production and production of pyridoxic acid from pyridoxal (vitamin B6)(58). During pregnancy the level of riboflavin carrier proteins in plasma increases, resulting in a higher rate of riboflavin uptake at the maternal surface of placenta and thus in transfer towards the fetus(105). One of the most commonly used indicators for riboflavin status assessment is the erythrocyte glutathione reductase activity coefficient. Values of <1·2 have been traditionally considered to be adequate by representing complete tissue saturation; 1·2–1·4 is considered as low and >1·4 as deficient(69); however, different cut-offs are often used by investigators.

Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) and related compounds are involved, among others, in amino acid, lipid and glycogen metabolism, and neurotransmitter synthesis(58). They are absorbed by passive diffusion. A cut-off point of 20 nmol/l has been proposed for plasma pyridoxal 5′-phosphate(69). In pregnancy, pyridoxal 5′-phosphate is lower still in subjects with pre-eclampsia(106).

Cobalamin (vitamin B12) is a cobalt-containing compound necessary for normal blood formation and neurological function(69). Vitamin B12 is normally transported by transcobalamin II, produced in the liver and the placenta. The transfer from mother to fetus occurs via specific-receptor carriers(107). Values between 148 and 220 pmol/l are considered subclinical deficiency of plasma vitamin B12 and values below this, clinical deficiency(82). Levels are affected substantially by age(58).

Evidence for environmentally induced alterations in methylation patterns in human subjects

C1 metabolism has been the subject of intense research, but concrete evidence of its involvement in DOHaD still needs to be built up systematically. The Pune Maternal Nutrition Study cohort in India has provided evidence of the importance of C1 metabolism in fetal programming(108110). Low maternal levels of vitamin B12 (<150 pmol/l) correlated strongly with hyperhomocysteine levels (>15 μmol/l)(109) and predicted higher offspring adiposity and higher insulin resistance(108). High levels of erythrocyte folate predicted increased body fat and insulin resistance too. Children from mothers with low vitamin B12 concentrations who were also folate replete were the most insulin resistant, possibly due to vitamin B12 disturbance of the methyl-group transfer for the folate-dependant pathway. The authors speculated about vitamin B12 trapping folate as 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, thereby preventing the generation of methionine from homocysteine and potentially DNA methylation, but this was not tested. Vitamin B12 and folate status at 18 weeks of pregnancy were more strongly associated than those at 28 weeks emphasising how critical these substances are in early-mid pregnancy(108). Interestingly, lower folate and higher plasma homocysteine(110) were associated with a smaller newborn size suggesting caution with strategies based only on increasing fetal growth. Research is moving towards direct assessment of biomarker exposure(s) instead of employing birth weight as proxy, as the latter has a multifactorial origin and has proved to be a poor measure of exposure(111).

While, in recent years, different micronutrient trials have been conducted(112114) that included folate and other cofactors (riboflavin and vitamins B6 and B12), these have so far only focused on short-term infant and adverse-pregnancy outcomes. Further investigations into DNA methylation patterns and longer-term follow up to explore disease risk will be important.

Comparable findings observed in animals of methyl-donor maternal supplementation inducing phenotypic changes mediated by DNA methylation are lacking in human subjects at present, but it is believed that similar mechanisms do take place. Some emerging evidence in human subjects has been provided by observational studies.

Monozygous twins are genetically identical; however, they can exhibit remarkable differences in susceptibility to diseases which may be affected by changes to DNA methylation. Thus, they offer a good opportunity for the study of epigenetics. Fraga et al.(36) observed that DNA methylation patterns in twins are indistinguishable at birth. This would be logical, as they share the same oviduct environment before implantation and although the nutrient supply might differ during placentation, it might be too late then to induce systemic epigenetic differences between twins(8). Therefore, they are likely to establish very similar DNA methylation patterns. However, methylation patterns in twins diverge over their life-time(36), illustrating the plasticity of DNA methylation, probably under environmental pressure. Divergences can already be observed in early childhood(115).

Relevant to the DOHaD theory and illustrative of epigenetic programming was the first evidence of effects of the intra-uterine environment on DNA methylation, which comes from the ‘natural experiment’ of the Dutch Hunger Winter cohort(116). This famine at the end of the Second World War provided a setting for the retrospective study of prenatal exposures: well-documented average daily rations dipping to 1673·6–3347·2 kJ/d (400–800 kcal/d), and detailed health care data on mothers. Long-term follow-up studies of individuals conceived during the famine have shown that prenatal undernutrition is associated with different adverse metabolic phenotypes, such as higher BMI, elevated serum cholesterol or impaired glucose tolerance and increased risk for insulin resistance, though this depends on the phase of development at exposure(116). In an attempt to explain these observations, Heijmans et al.(117) tested for differences in DNA methylation of the IGF2 gene locus comparing those exposed to periconceptional famine in early development with same-sex siblings conceived before or after the famine six decades later (Table 1). The authors found an average decrease of 5·2% in DNA methylation at this locus, thus suggesting that transient environmental conditions such as intra-uterine undernutrition can be recorded as persistent changes in the epigenome(117). Interestingly, the association was only found when exposure was periconceptional but not later in gestation, highlighting the importance of timing of exposure. Steegers-Theunissen et al.(118) also looked at whether maternal folic acid periconceptional supplementation affected methylation of insulin-like growth factor 2 showing a 4·5% increase in methylation in individuals whose mothers had taken folate during early pregnancy.

Table 1.

Effect of environmental (nutritional) exposure in utero on DNA methylation in human studies

graphic file with name S0029665111003338_tab1.jpg

a

IGF2, insulin-like growth factor 2; CpG, cytosine–guanidine; ME, metastable epialleles.

The same group later tested a set of fifteen additional candidate genes and reported association of periconceptional undernutrition with DNA methylation for six of the genes(119). Results for two genes indicated association with exposure during late gestation, thus suggesting that environmentally induced methylation changes are not limited to periconception (Table 1). Some of the associations were sex-dependent, in line with previous findings in human subjects(120) and sheep(51). The differences in methylation were smaller than those seen for the insulin-like growth factor 2 locus and often showed an increase rather than an expected decrease in methylation with undernutrition. This is difficult to explain by deficiency in methyl donors, and thought to be part of an adaptative response(119). These studies on the Dutch Hunger Winter cohort suggest that DNA methylation changes assumed to be established in early development can be persistent and may be frequent, but of relative small individual effect, implying that disease risk might entail a combination of multiple changes(2). Interestingly, Tobi et al.(121) investigated (using the same cohort) whether the methylation level at defined loci was related to intrauterine growth restriction and children small for gestational age, both being phenotypes commonly used as measures of fetal environment, and found no association(121). The authors concluded that these parameters may thus be associated with epigenetic changes in other loci not investigated or to non-epigenetic mechanisms.

To further our understanding in this area, Waterland et al.(122) set out to identify ME in human subjects. ME are more likely to be affected by environmental exposures and are not tissue-specific, which make it easier to analyse ME in human studies, through use of DNA from readily accessible peripheral blood samples as opposed to DNA from specific tissue samples. They designed a genome-wide methylation-specific analysis to screen for ME. Parallel screening of DNA from different tissues was used to exclude loci with tissue-specific methylation and discordance within monozygotic twin pairs provided support that inter-individual variation in methylation at the identified ME was stochastic. The establishment of ME in early development was then tested by studying differences in DNA methylation according to season of conception (dry/rainy) in rural Gambia (West Africa). Rural Gambia experiences dramatic seasonal fluctuations in food availability and maternal nutritional status, the rainy season being the most nutritionally challenged due to the high workload in the fields and the scarce stocks remaining from the previous harvest(123). At the five loci investigated (Table 1), conception during the annual rainy season resulted in significantly higher DNA methylation, thus providing the first evidence of environmentally-associated changes in human ME. It is not clear whether these differences in DNA methylation in individuals conceived in the dry or the rainy season are mediated by seasonal differences in the availability or deficiency of methyl groups in the diet and maternal nutritional status. The differences in methylation by season were >10% for several of the loci and thus less subtle than those observed during the Dutch Hunger Winter studies(117,119). Since ME affect every cell type, they are more likely to be relevant to human disease. Notably, two of the five described genes, namely PAX8 and SLITRK1, are known to be implicated in hypothyroidism and Tourette's syndrome, respectively(122).

Additionally, from the Swedish Overkalix cohort there are some hints of (male-line) transgenerational responses to nutrition in human subjects(124). Food supply in adolescence of paternal grandparents correlated with the grandchild's longevity, including associations with risk of cardiovascular or diabetic death. There is currently no data on the mechanism(s) underlying these observations, however, epigenetic gametic inheritance may be a possible explanation(22).

From the studies outlined earlier several conclusions can be drawn. Human ME are likely to be susceptible to early environmental influences(122). Differential methylation at other loci (e.g. IGF2, GNASAS or IL-10) (Table 1), not classified as ME, also appear to be affected by early nutritional exposures. Attention has to be given not only to the timing but also to the strength of the exposure. The Gambian study(122) investigated severe yet ‘physiologically’ mild differences in exposure as measured by season (which may or may not reflect maternal status), whereas in the Dutch studies(117) famine arguably is a more extreme exposure with regard to establishment of DNA methylation patterns in early development. It would be interesting to see whether the findings in Gambians can be reproduced in The Dutch Hunger Winter setting and whether there might be greater differences in methylation rate at the ME identified. Additionally, more data are needed in terms of accurate measurement of timing, dose and nutrient type(s) exposure periconceptionally or during pregnancy.

Conclusions

Epigenetics is still a recent and intricate science, where much is known but even more is yet to be determined. DNA methylation and other epigenetic mechanisms are becoming easier to study because of advances in technology, with the potential for providing a deeper understanding of complex diseases, even in utero.

There is an increasing body of evidence in animal models to suggest that many of the observed effects in fetal programming are mediated by epigenetic changes, but parallel evidence has to be further developed in human subjects. Furthermore, critical windows of exposure(s) that seem to exist during development have to be better defined, and also the balance between early acquired DNA methylation patterns as compared with ulterior modifications during life-course.

It is certainly a challenge to identify genomic regions that are likely to be more susceptible to methylation changes in response to prenatal environmental influences (human ME). Analogous to the development of the ‘Human Genome Project’, the ‘Human Epigenome Project’ aims to identify, catalogue and interpret DNA methylation patterns of all human genes in all major tissues (http://www.epigenome.org/). This and other research efforts will help understand epigenetic processes and their role in disease pathogenesis.

Redundancy in methyl-donor supply pathways as part of the C1 metabolism means that changes in the level of one substance can potentially perturb the others through compensation mechanisms. Therefore, a comprehensive approach is needed when investigating these substances and how they affect DNA methylation.

All this needs to be taken into account in the design of new studies to better understand how maternal diet affects developmental epigenetics and the possible downstream consequences. Prospective studies, either observational or supplementation trials, should be designed, where accurate maternal nutritional status at specific times during pregnancy and the interactions between the different nutrients can be assessed in relation with DNA methylation. In addition, it will be important to link such basic research to measurable health effects in offspring phenotype, thus children need to be followed-up to ascertain the real impact of DNA methylation changes established during early development.

Acknowledgements

Paula Dominguez-Salas prepared the manuscript. Her PhD supervisors, Dr Hennig and Dr Moore, as well as Dr Cox and Professor Prentice, who are closely involved in her research, provided valuable input to this manuscript. All of the authors declare that there is no conflict of interests associated with this research. The present review was done in the framework of research supported by a Wellcome Trust project grant (ref. WT086369MA).

References

  • 1.Barker DJ, Eriksson JG, Forsen T. et al. Fetal origins of adult disease: strength of effects and biological basis. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:1235–1239. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.6.1235. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Heijmans BT, Tobi EW, Lumey LH. et al. The epigenome: archive of the prenatal environment. Epigenetics. 2009;4:526–531. doi: 10.4161/epi.4.8.10265. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fall C. Maternal nutrition: effects on health in the next generation. Indian J Med Res. 2009;130:593–599. ( [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barker DJ. Osmond C. Infant mortality, childhood nutrition, and ischaemic heart disease in England and Wales. Lancet. 1986;1:1077–1081. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91340-1. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Law CM. Shiell AW. Is blood pressure inversely related to birth weight? The strength of evidence from a systematic review of the literature. J Hypertens. 1996;14:935–941. & . ( [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Whincup PH, Kaye SJ, Owen CG. et al. Birth weight and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2008;300:2886–2897. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.886. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Michels KB. Xue F. Role of birthweight in the etiology of breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2007–2025. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22004. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Waterland RA. Michels KB. Epigenetic epidemiology of the developmental origins hypothesis. Annu Rev Nutr. 2007;27:363–388. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093705. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sharma S, Kelly TK. Jones PA. Epigenetics in cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:27–36. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgp220. & . ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Suzuki MM. Bird A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:465–476. doi: 10.1038/nrg2341. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim JK, Samaranayake M. Pradhan S. Epigenetic mechanisms in mammals. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66:596–612. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8432-4. & . ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Waterland RA. Assessing the effects of high methionine intake on DNA methylation. J Nutr. 2006;136:1706S–1710S. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.6.1706S. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jones PA. Liang G. Rethinking how DNA methylation patterns are maintained. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:805–811. doi: 10.1038/nrg2651. & . ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xu F, Mao C, Ding Y. et al. Molecular and enzymatic profiles of mammalian DNA methyltransferases: structures and targets for drugs. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:4052–4071. doi: 10.2174/092986710793205372. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Reik W. Walter J. Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:21–32. doi: 10.1038/35047554. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Richards EJ. Inherited epigenetic variation–revisiting soft inheritance. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:395–401. doi: 10.1038/nrg1834. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Whitelaw NC. Whitelaw E. How lifetimes shape epigenotype within and across generations. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:R131–R137. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl200. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Heard E. Delving into the diversity of facultative heterochromatin: the epigenetics of the inactive X chromosome. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2005;15:482–489. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2005.08.009. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Killian JK, Byrd JC, Jirtle JV. et al. M6P/IGF2R imprinting evolution in mammals. Mol Cell. 2000;5:707–716. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80249-x. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moore T. Haig D. Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. Trends Genet. 1991;7:45–49. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(91)90230-N. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Robertson KD. DNA methylation and human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:597–610. doi: 10.1038/nrg1655. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pembrey ME. Male-line transgenerational responses in humans. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2010;13:268–271. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2010.524721. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Buiting K, Gross S, Lich C. et al. Epimutations in Prader–Willi and Angelman syndromes: a molecular study of 136 patients with an imprinting defect. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:571–577. doi: 10.1086/367926. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Weksberg R, Shuman C. Beckwith JB. Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:8. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.106. & . ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Burdge GC, Slater-Jefferies J, Torrens C. et al. Dietary protein restriction of pregnant rats in the F0 generation induces altered methylation of hepatic gene promoters in the adult male offspring in the F1 and F2 generations. Br J Nutr. 2007;97:435–439. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507352392. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Skinner MK. Role of epigenetics in developmental biology and transgenerational inheritance. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2011;93:51–55. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.20199. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Anway MD, Leathers C. Skinner MK. Endocrine disruptor vinclozolin induced epigenetic transgenerational adult-onset disease. Endocrinology. 2006;147:5515–5523. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0640. & . ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rakyan VK, Blewitt ME, Druker R. et al. Metastable epialleles in mammals. Trends Genet. 2002;18:348–351. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(02)02709-9. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Waterland RA. Jirtle RL. Transposable elements: targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:5293–5300. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.15.5293-5300.2003. & . ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dolinoy DC, Das R, Weidman JR. et al. Metastable epialleles, imprinting, and the fetal origins of adult diseases. Pediatr Res. 2007;61:30R–37R. doi: 10.1203/pdr.0b013e31804575f7. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Herceg Z. Epigenetics and cancer: towards an evaluation of the impact of environmental and dietary factors. Mutagenesis. 2007;22:91. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gel068. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Weaver IC. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior and pharmacological intervention. Nature versus nurture: let's call the whole thing off. Epigenetics. 2007;2:22–28. doi: 10.4161/epi.2.1.3881. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Attig L, Gabory A. Junien C. Nutritional developmental epigenomics: immediate and long-lasting effects. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010;69:221–231. doi: 10.1017/S002966511000008X. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Szyf M. Epigenetics, DNA methylation, and chromatin modifying drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009;49:243–263. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-061008-103102. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zeisel SH. Importance of methyl donors during reproduction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:673S–677S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26811D. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF. et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:10604–10609. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500398102. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kim KC, Friso S. Choi SW. DNA methylation, an epigenetic mechanism connecting folate to healthy embryonic development and aging. J Nutr Biochem. 2009;20:917–926. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.06.008. & . ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Richardson BC. Role of DNA methylation in the regulation of cell function: autoimmunity, aging and cancer. J Nutr. 2002;132:2401S–2405S. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.8.2401S. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jiang YH, Bressler J. Beaud. et al. Epigenetics and human disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2004;5:479–510. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.5.061903.180014. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kong A, Steinthorsdottir V, Masson G. et al. Parental origin of sequence variants associated with complex diseases. Nature. 2009;462:868–874. doi: 10.1038/nature08625. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Plass C. Cancer epigenomics. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:2479–2488. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.20.2479. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Corwin EJ. The concept of epigenetics and its role in the development of cardiovascular disease: commentary on “new and emerging theories of cardiovascular disease”. Biol Res Nurs. 2004;6:11–16. doi: 10.1177/1099800404264779. ( ; discussion 21–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Maier S. Olek A. Diabetes: a candidate disease for efficient DNA methylation profiling. J Nutr. 2002;132:2440S–2443S. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.8.2440S. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Waterland RA. Does nutrition during infancy and early childhood contribute to later obesity via metabolic imprinting of epigenetic gene regulatory mechanisms? Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program. 2005;56:157–171. doi: 10.1159/000086298. ( ; discussion 71–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wolff GL, Kodell RL, Moore SR. et al. Maternal epigenetics and methyl supplements affect agouti gene expression in Avy/a mice. FASEB J. 1998;12:949–957. ( [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Duhl DM, Vrieling H, Miller KA. et al. Neomorphic agouti mutations in obese yellow mice. Nat Genet. 1994;8:59–65. doi: 10.1038/ng0994-59. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Waterland RA, Dolinoy DC, Lin JR. et al. Maternal methyl supplements increase offspring DNA methylation at Axin Fused. Genesis. 2006;44:401–406. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20230. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chmurzynska A. Fetal programming: link between early nutrition, DNA methylation, and complex diseases. Nutr Rev. 2010;68:87–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00265.x. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Youngson NA. Whitelaw E. Transgenerational epigenetic effects. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008;9:233–257. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164445. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Morgan DK. Whitelaw E. The role of epigenetics in mediating environmental effects on phenotype. Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program. 2009;63:109–117. doi: 10.1159/000209976. & . ( ; discussion 17–19, 259–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sinclair KD, Allegrucci C, Singh R. et al. DNA methylation, insulin resistance, and blood pressure in offspring determined by maternal periconceptional B vitamin and methionine status. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:19351–19356. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707258104. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zeisel SH. Genetic polymorphisms in methyl-group metabolism and epigenetics: lessons from humans and mouse models. Brain Res. 2008;1237:5. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.08.059. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zeisel SH. Choline, homocysteine, and pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:719–720. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/82.4.719. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jacob RA, Jenden DJ, Allman-Farinelli MA. et al. Folate nutriture alters choline status of women and men fed low choline diets. J Nutr. 1999;129:712–717. doi: 10.1093/jn/129.3.712. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jacques PF, Bostom AG, Wilson PW. et al. Determinants of plasma total homocysteine concentration in the Framingham Offspring cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73:613–621. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.3.613. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.da Costa KA, Gaffney CE, Fischer LM. et al. Choline deficiency in mice and humans is associated with increased plasma homocysteine concentration after a methionine load. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:440–444. doi: 10.1093/ajcn.81.2.440. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kalnitsky A, Rosenblatt D. Zlotkin S. Differences in liver folate enzyme patterns in premature and full term infants. Pediatr Res. 1982;16:628–631. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198208000-00008. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gibson R. Principles of Nutritional Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. ( [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hoffman DR, Marion DW, Cornatzer WE. et al. S-adenosylmethionine and S-adenosylhomocystein metabolism in isolated rat liver. Effects of L-methionine, L-homocystein, and adenosine. J Biol Chem. 1980;255:10822–10827. ( [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chen NC, Yang F, Capecci LM. et al. Regulation of homocysteine metabolism and methylation in human and mouse tissues. FASEB J. 2010;24:2804–2817. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-143651. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.James SJ, Melnyk S, Pogribna M. et al. Elevation in S-adenosylhomocysteine and DNA hypomethylation: potential epigenetic mechanism for homocysteine-related pathology. J Nutr. 2002;132:2361S–2366S. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.8.2361S. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ulrey CL, Liu L, Andrews LG. et al. The impact of metabolism on DNA methylation. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:R139–R147. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi100. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Finkelstein JD. Pathways and regulation of homocysteine metabolism in mammals. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2000;26:219–225. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-8466. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Brosnan JT. Brosnan ME. The sulfur-containing amino acids: an overview. J Nutr. 2006;136:1636S–1640S. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.6.1636S. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Steenge GR, Verhoef P. Katan MB. Betaine supplementation lowers plasma homocysteine in healthy men and women. J Nutr. 2003;133:1291–1295. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.5.1291. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chiuve SE, Giovannucci EL, Hankinson SE. et al. The association between betaine and choline intakes and the plasma concentrations of homocysteine in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:1073–1081. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/86.4.1073. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Maron BA. Loscalzo J. The treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:39–54. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.60.041807.123308. & . ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dalery K, Lussier-Cacan S, Selhub J. et al. Homocysteine and coronary artery disease in French Canadian subjects: relation with vitamins B12, B6, pyridoxal phosphate, and folate. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:1107–1111. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80739-5. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Dietary Reference Intakes for Folate, Thiamine, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B12, Panthothenic acid, Biotine, and Choline [Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences US, editor] Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998. ( [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Clarke R, Halsey J, Lewington S. et al. Effects of lowering homocysteine levels with B vitamins on cardiovascular disease, cancer, and cause-specific mortality: Meta-analysis of 8 randomized trials involving 37 485 individuals. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1622–1631. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.348. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Vollset SE, Refsum H, Irgens LM. et al. Plasma total homocysteine, pregnancy complications, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: The Hordaland Homocysteine study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:962–968. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.4.962. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chang H, Zhang T, Zhang Z. et al. Tissue-specific distribution of aberrant DNA methylation associated with maternal low-folate status in human neural tube defects. J Nutr Biochem. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.10.003. ( (In the Press). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Walker MC, Smith GN, Perkins SL. et al. Changes in homocysteine levels during normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:660–664. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70269-3. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bonnette RE, Caudill MA, Boddie AM. et al. Plasma homocyst(e)ine concentrations in pregnant and nonpregnant women with controlled folate intake. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:167–170. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00154-9. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Friesen RW, Novak EM, Hasman D. et al. Relationship of dimethylglycine, choline, and betaine with oxoproline in plasma of pregnant women and their newborn infants. J Nutr. 2007;137:2641–2646. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.12.2641. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Niculescu MD. Zeisel SH. Diet, methyl donors and DNA methylation: interactions between dietary folate, methionine and choline. J Nutr. 2002;132:2333S–2335S. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.8.2333S. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Beaudin AE. Stover PJ. Folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism and neural tube defects: balancing genome synthesis and gene expression. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2007;81:183–203. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.20100. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Lancet. 1991;338:131–137. ( [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Persad VL, Van den Hof MC, Dube JM. et al. Incidence of open neural tube defects in Nova Scotia after folic acid fortification. CMAJ. 2002;167:241–245. ( [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tamura T. Picciano MF. Folate and human reproduction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:993. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/83.5.993. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Baker H, Frank O, Deangelis B. et al. Role of placenta in maternal-fetal vitamin transfer in humans. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141:792–796. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90706-7. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Green R. Indicators for assessing folate and vitamin B-12 status and for monitoring the efficacy of intervention strategies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:666S–672S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.009613. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bruinse HW. van den Berg H. Changes of some vitamin levels during and after normal pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995;61:31–37. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(95)02150-q. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Malinow MR, Rajkovic A, Duell PB. et al. The relationship between maternal and neonatal umbilical cord plasma homocyst(e)ine suggests a potential role for maternal homocyst(e)ine in fetal metabolism. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:228–233. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)80005-7. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zeisel SH. Is maternal diet supplementation beneficial? Optimal development of infant depends on mother's diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:685S–687S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26811F. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.da Costa KA, Badea M, Fischer LM. et al. Elevated serum creatine phosphokinase in choline-deficient humans: mechanistic studies in C2C12 mouse myoblasts. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:163–170. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/80.1.163. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Fischer LM, daCosta KA, Kwock L. et al. Sex and menopausal status influence human dietary requirements for the nutrient choline. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:1275–1285. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.5.1275. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Yang W. et al. Periconceptional dietary intake of choline and betaine and neural tube defects in offspring. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160:102–109. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh187. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Fisher MC, Zeisel SH, Mar MH. et al. Perturbations in choline metabolism cause neural tube defects in mouse embryos in vitro. FASEB J. 2002;16:619–621. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0564fje. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Craig SA. Betaine in human nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:539–549. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/80.3.539. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Meck WH. Williams CL. Metabolic imprinting of choline by its availability during gestation: implications for memory and attentional processing across the lifespan. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2003;27:385–399. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00069-1. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Craciunescu CN, Brown EC, Mar MH. et al. Folic acid deficiency during late gestation decreases progenitor cell proliferation and increases apoptosis in fetal mouse brain. J Nutr. 2004;134:162–166. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.1.162. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Craciunescu CN, Albright CD, Mar MH. et al. Choline availability during embryonic development alters progenitor cell mitosis in developing mouse hippocampus. J Nutr. 2003;133:3614–3618. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.11.3614. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zeisel SH. da Costa KA. Choline: an essential nutrient for public health. Nutr Rev. 2009;67:615–623. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00246.x. & . ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Gossell-Williams M, Fletcher H, McFarlane-Anderson N. et al. Dietary intake of choline and plasma choline concentrations in pregnant women in Jamaica. West Indian Med J. 2005;54:355–359. doi: 10.1590/s0043-31442005000600002. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lee NY, Choi HM. Kang YS. Choline transport via choline transporter-like protein 1 in conditionally immortalized rat syncytiotrophoblast cell lines TR-TBT. Placenta. 2009;30:368–374. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.01.011. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zeisel SH. Choline: critical role during fetal development and dietary requirements in adults. Annu Rev Nutr. 2006;26:229–250. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.26.061505.111156. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Ozarda Ilcol Y, Uncu G. Ulus IH. Free and phospholipid-bound choline concentrations in serum during pregnancy, after delivery and in newborns. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2002;110:393–399. doi: 10.1076/apab.110.5.393.11832. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Lever M. Slow S. The clinical significance of betaine, an osmolyte with a key role in methyl group metabolism. Clin Biochem. 2010;43:732–744. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.03.009. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Velzing-Aarts FV, Holm PI, Fokkema MR. et al. Plasma choline and betaine and their relation to plasma homocysteine in normal pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:1383–1389. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/81.6.1383. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Davies SE, Chalmers RA, Randall EW. et al. Betaine metabolism in human neonates and developing rats. Clin Chim Acta. 1988;178:241–249. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(88)90232-x. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Finkelstein JD, Martin JJ. Harris BJ. Methionine metabolism in mammals. The methionine-sparing effect of cystine. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:11750–11754. & . ( [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Shaw GM, Velie EM. Schaffer DM. Is dietary intake of methionine associated with a reduction in risk for neural tube defect-affected pregnancies? Teratology. 1997;56:295–299. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199711)56:5<295::AID-TERA1>3.0.CO;2-X. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Carmichael SL, Yang W. Shaw GM. Periconceptional nutrient intakes and risks of neural tube defects in California. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88:670–678. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20675. & . ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Dancis J, Lehanka J. Levitz M. Placental transport of riboflavin: differential rates of uptake at the maternal and fetal surfaces of the perfused human placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:204–210. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90811-3. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Shane B. Contractor SF. Assessment of vitamin B6 status. Studies on pregnant women and oral contraceptive users. Am J Clin Nutr. 1975;28:739–747. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/28.7.739. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Schneider H. Miller RK. Receptor-mediated uptake and transport of macromolecules in the human placenta. Int J Dev Biol. 2010;54:367–375. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.082773hs. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Yajnik CS, Deshpande SS, Jackson AA. et al. Vitamin B12 and folate concentrations during pregnancy and insulin resistance in the offspring: the Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. Diabetologia. 2008;51:29–38. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0793-y. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Refsum H, Yajnik CS, Gadkari M. et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia and elevated methylmalonic acid indicate a high prevalence of cobalamin deficiency in Asian Indians. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74:233–241. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/74.2.233. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Rao S, Yajnik CS, Kanade A. et al. Intake of micronutrient-rich foods in rural Indian mothers is associated with the size of their babies at birth: Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. J Nutr. 2001;131:1217–1224. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.4.1217. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Hawkesworth S. Conference on “Multidisciplinary approaches to nutritional problems”. Postgraduate Symposium. Exploiting dietary supplementation trials to assess the impact of the prenatal environment on CVD risk. Proc Nutr Soc. 2009;68:78–88. doi: 10.1017/S0029665108008781. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Vaidya A, Saville N, Shrestha BP. et al. Effects of antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation on children's weight and size at 2 years of age in Nepal: follow-up of a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;371:492–499. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60172-5. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Tofail F, Persson LA, El Arifeen S. et al. Effects of prenatal food and micronutrient supplementation on infant development: a randomized trial from the Maternal and Infant Nutrition Interventions, Matlab (MINIMat) study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:704–711. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.3.704. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Christian P, Khatry SK, Katz J. et al. Effects of alternative maternal micronutrient supplements on low birth weight in rural Nepal: double blind randomised community trial. Br Med J. 2003;326:571. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7389.571. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Wong CC, Caspi A, Williams B. et al. A longitudinal twin study of skewed X chromosome-inactivation. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017873. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Roseboom T, de Rooij S. Painter R. The Dutch famine and its long-term consequences for adult health. Early Hum Dev. 2006;82:485–491. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.07.001. & . ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Heijmans BT, Tobi EW, Stein AD. et al. Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:17046–17049. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806560105. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Steegers-Theunissen RP, Obermann-Borst SA, Kremer D. et al. Periconceptional maternal folic acid use of 400 μg per day is related to increased methylation of the IGF2 gene in the very young child. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007845. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Tobi EW, Lumey LH, Talens RP. et al. DNA methylation differences after exposure to prenatal famine are common and timing- and sex-specific. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:4046–4053. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp353. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.El-Maarri O, Becker T, Junen J. et al. Gender specific differences in levels of DNA methylation at selected loci from human total blood: a tendency toward higher methylation levels in males. Hum Genet. 2007;122:505–514. doi: 10.1007/s00439-007-0430-3. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Tobi EW, Heijmans BT, Kremer D. et al. DNA methylation of IGF2, GNASAS, INSIGF and LEP and being born small for gestational age. Epigenetics. 2011;6:171–176. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.2.13516. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Waterland RA, Kellermayer R, Laritsky E. et al. Season of conception in rural Gambia affects DNA methylation at putative human metastable epialleles. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001252. ( [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Prentice AM, Whitehead RG, Roberts SB. et al. Long-term energy balance in child-bearing Gambian women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34:2790–2799. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/34.12.2790. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Pembrey ME, Bygren LO, Kaati G. et al. Sex-specific, male-line transgenerational responses in humans. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14:159–166. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201538. ( [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES