Skip to main content
American Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to American Journal of Epidemiology
. 2012 Jul 12;176(3):224–232. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr523

Air Pollution and DNA Methylation: Interaction by Psychological Factors in the VA Normative Aging Study

Jaime Madrigano *, Andrea Baccarelli, Murray A Mittleman, David Sparrow, Avron Spiro III, Pantel S Vokonas, Laura Cantone, Laura Kubzansky, Joel Schwartz
PMCID: PMC3491965  PMID: 22798479

Abstract

DNA methylation is a potential pathway linking air pollution to disease. Studies indicate that psychological functioning modifies the association between pollution and morbidity. The authors estimated the association of DNA methylation with ambient particulate matter less than 2.5 µm in diameter (PM2.5) and black carbon, using mixed models. DNA methylation of the inducible nitric oxide synthase gene, iNOS, and the glucocorticoid receptor gene, GCR, was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction pyrosequencing of 1,377 blood samples from 699 elderly male participants in the VA Normative Aging Study (1999–2009). The authors also investigated whether this association was modified by psychological factors including optimism or pessimism, anxiety, and depression. iNOS methylation was decreased after acute exposure to both black carbon and PM2.5. A 1-μg/m3 increase in exposure to black carbon in the 4 hours preceding the clinical examination was associated with a 0.9% decrease in 5-methylcytosine (95% CI: 0.4, 1.4) in iNOS, and a 10-μg/m3 increase in exposure to PM2.5 was associated with a 0.6% decrease in 5-methylcytosine (95% CI: 0.03, 1.1) in iNOS. Participants with low optimism and high anxiety had associations that were 3–4 times larger than those with high optimism or low anxiety. GCR methylation was not associated with particulate air pollution exposure.

Keywords: air pollution, DNA methylation, psychology


Air pollution has been associated with morbidity and mortality (1, 2), and epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, have been hypothesized as a potential pathway linking environmental exposures and disease outcomes. DNA methylation has been associated with diseases, such as cancer (3), ischemic heart disease (4), and atherosclerosis (5), and studies suggest that changes in DNA methylation may be a biomarker of disease risk (6). A limited body of evidence indicates that environmental exposures may be associated with changes in DNA methylation, but only a few studies have demonstrated associations with ambient air pollution (79) or second-hand smoke (10).

A growing body of literature suggests that psychological factors alter susceptibility to physical exposures (1113). Clougherty and Kubzansky (14) have hypothesized that allostatic load may be a mechanism by which this occurs, whereby chronic psychological stress impairs the body's ability to respond to transient environmental stressors. If physical environmental stressors and psychological stressors impact health through similar physiologic mechanisms, they may act synergistically beyond their individual effect. Few studies have examined the association between air pollution and DNA methylation, and none, to our knowledge, have examined the interrelation among air pollution, psychological factors, and DNA methylation. This study is an extension of the work examining synergism between the physical and social environments.

First, we sought to examine the association between ambient particulate air pollution and DNA methylation in the promoter regions of 2 specific genes: the inducible nitric oxide synthase gene, iNOS, and the glucocorticoid receptor gene, GCR. We selected these genes because of their relation to inflammation and the stress response. Inflammation is considered a primary mechanism linking inhalation of air pollutants to their acute health effects (15). A key step during inflammation is the chemokine-controlled leukocyte infiltration, which is regulated by inducible nitric oxide synthase-derived nitric oxide (16). The glucocorticoid receptor is also linked to the inflammatory process, as glucocorticoids exert antiinflammatory effects on many cell types (17).

Second, we examined whether certain psychological traits and symptoms altered the association between air pollution and DNA methylation. Studies indicate that stress is associated with modifications to oxidative/nitrosative pathways in the brain in response to activation of inflammatory mediators and that stress results in increased nitric oxide production in the brain and periphery (18). The glucocorticoid receptor has also been implicated in the stress response (19), and early exposure to stress in humans has been associated with increased methylation of GCR and an increased cortisol stress response (20). We focused on psychological factors that have been linked to respiratory and cardiovascular disease, as these outcomes have been associated with air pollution exposure. We hypothesized that poor psychological functioning (characterized by greater depression, anxiety, and pessimism, as well as lower optimism) would enhance the association between air pollution and DNA methylation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

This study included 735 elderly men who, as of March 1999, were active participants in the VA Normative Aging Study. Established by the Veterans Administration in 1961, the Normative Aging Study cohort enrolled men 21–80 years of age from the greater Boston, Massachusetts, area who were free of known chronic medical conditions (21). Since enrollment, participants have had comprehensive clinical examinations at intervals from 3 to 5 years. Further details can be found elsewhere (22). In examinations that took place between March 1999 and December 2009, active participants agreed to donate at least 1 blood sample that was used to analyze DNA methylation. Because of iNOS methylation assay failures, there were 661 men with 1,176 measurements of iNOS methylation and 735 men with 1,466 measurements of GCR methylation. After exclusion of men who were seasonal residents in the Boston metropolitan area, there were 627 men with 1,105 measurements of iNOS methylation and 699 men with 1,377 measurements of GCR methylation.

Exposure variable and covariates

The air pollutant of interest was ambient particulate matter less than 2.5 µm in diameter (PM2.5) and one of its components, black carbon, which is a measure of traffic particles. Measurements were obtained from a stationary monitoring source located at the Harvard School of Public Health, less than 1 km from the examination site where the patients' visits took place. The median distance of the participants' homes from the central site monitoring station was 20.5 km, with an interquartile range from 10.5 to 37.9 km. The maximum distance was 126 km, but 90% of participants live within 78 km of the central monitoring site.

PM2.5 was measured continuously by using a model 1400A tapered element oscillating microbalance (Rupprecht & Patashnick Co., East Greenbush, New York), operated at 50°C with 2 model 4LPM-PM2.5 impactors before the inlet. A season-specific correction, based on collocated gravimetric samplers, was used to correct for loss of semivolatile particles in the monitor. Black carbon was measured continuously by using a model AE-14 aethalometer (Magee Scientific, Inc., Berkeley, California). Hourly data for black carbon and PM2.5 were occasionally missing. For these times, data were imputed by use of a regression model (23). Covariate information was assessed at each medical examination. The temperature and relative humidity for each day were obtained from the National Climatic Data Center (Asheville, North Carolina).

The Life Orientation Test was used to measure dispositional optimism and pessimism. A validated instrument (24), the Life Orientation Test is made up of 12 items comprising questions such as, “If something can go wrong for me, it will.” Depressive and anxious symptoms were evaluated by using the Brief Symptom Inventory, a 53-item validated questionnaire that assesses 9 primary symptom dimensions (anxiety, depression, hostility, interpersonal sensitivity, obsessive-compulsive, paranoid ideation, phobic anxiety, psychoticism, somatization) (25). Further information about these measurements can be found in the Web Appendix that, along with 10 Web-only tables, is posted on the Journal's website (http://www.aje.oxfordjournals.org/). To examine the variation over time in psychological measures, we calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient for using a mean rating as the unit of analysis or the reliability for the mean score (26) by the SAS %INTRACC macro (available at http://support.sas.com/kb/25/031.html#ref).

Outcome variable

DNA methylation analyses were performed on bisulfite-treated DNA by using highly quantitative analyses based on polymerase chain reaction pyrosequencing; a 500-ng DNA sample (concentration, 25 ng/μL) was treated by using an EZ DNA Methylation-Gold Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, California) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Further details can be found in the Web Appendix (Web Tables 1–3). DNA methylation analysis measured 2 individual CpG dinucleotide positions for iNOS and 1 CpG dinucleotide position for GCR. At each CpG position, pyrosequencing was repeated twice, and the results were averaged to minimize the assay variability. All samples were analyzed consecutively by 1 laboratory technician.

Statistical analysis

Multiple moving-averaged exposures of PM2.5 and black carbon were examined. The moving average is the mean exposure for the time period before each examination. Because fasting blood samples are collected, blood is always drawn in the morning, at approximately 8 am. The moving average is calculated from 8:00 am (i.e., the 4-hour moving average includes the 4 hours immediately preceding 8:00 am of the visit day) and, therefore, is close to the blood draw time. Separate models were created for each of the following moving average exposure windows: 4 hours and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, and 28 days preceding the clinical examination. These windows were chosen because they have been shown to be important in the relation between air pollution and DNA methylation (7, 9), as well as other intermediate health outcomes (2730).

Although DNA methylation at adjacent CpG sites is usually correlated, the correlation is not perfect, and differences exist that are not due to random variability. Therefore, mixed models were used to take full advantage of the information from all the measurements in the data and to maximize statistical power by distinguishing between the different sources of variance in the data. Accordingly, mixed-effects models with 2 random intercepts were used to capture the correlation among measurements within the same subject or the same location within a promoter region. The model was as follows:

graphic file with name kwr523eqnU1.jpg (1)

where Yijk is the measured value of iNOS methylation at CpG dinucleotide position i at visit j of subject k; β0 is the overall intercept; uk is the separate random intercept for the subject, which captures the correlation among measurements within the same subject; ui is the separate random intercept for each CpG dinucleotide postion, which captures the average difference between methylation at that dinucleotide position and the overall mean methylation for the gene; and X2Xp are the covariates. Because GCR methylation was measured at only 1 CpG position, a simplified version of model 1 was used, which included only 1 random intercept for each subject.

The following potential confounders were chosen a priori and included baseline age; season (through sine and cosine functions of time); a linear term for time to capture long-term trends; a linear term for apparent temperature, a composite index of human discomfort due to combined heat and high humidity, calculated from air and dew point temperature (31); and the percent lymphocytes and percent neutrophils. The latter were included to control potential variation among leukocyte populations in iNOS and GCR methylation (32). A second set of covariates, which were not thought to be confounders, was also evaluated. The following were potential predictors of DNA methylation that were evaluated to improve the goodness of fit of our models: smoking (current/former/never and pack-years), body mass index, hypertension medication, alcohol intake (>2 drinks per day), diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, number of years of education, and race (white/black). We used the stepwise selection procedure “stepAIC” in R, version 2.10.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), to determine which of these additional covariates improved the fit of the mixed models. After running separate models for each moving-average time window of exposure, we created models with multiple averaging time windows of exposure to determine which was the most appropriate time window of exposure. We performed a number of sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of our findings. These included restricting our population to those living within 40 km of the central air pollution monitor, including seasonal residents, using a quadratic term to model temperature, and using the mean methylation measurement from the 2 CpG sites for iNOS.

Finally, when we identified a main association with an air pollutant, interaction between our pollutant exposures and psychological measures was examined. The models examining interaction were restricted to the a priori potential confounders. To facilitate interpretability of the interaction term, we dichotomized the measures of optimism and pessimism by the median value. As a sensitivity analysis, optimism and pessimism were also dichotomized at the upper quartile of our population distribution, because studies examining these traits in relation to morbidity and mortality have used such cutpoints (33, 34). For depression and anxiety, a binary variable to indicate when scores were 1 standard deviation above the normal population mean (i.e., > 0.50) was used, as was done previously in this cohort (35). Interaction was examined for the psychological measures by a cross-product term of high versus low and by a linear term for PM2.5 or black carbon. All final mixed-effect models were conducted by using the PROC MIXED procedure in SAS, version 9.2, software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina).

RESULTS

The mean age of participants at baseline was 72 years (Table 1). The mean level of iNOS methylation was 68.4% 5-methylcytosine, with a range of 24.5%–87.2% 5-methylcytosine. The 2 CpG loci in iNOS were moderately correlated (rho = 0.455; P < 0.0001). The mean level of GCR methylation was 46.6% 5-methylcytosine, with a range of 14.7%–87.2% 5-methylcytosine. During the study period, the mean levels of PM2.5 and black carbon over a 24-hour period were 10.5 µg/m3 and 0.8 µg/m3 (Table 2). A summary of exposure levels by psychological category is provided in Web Table 4. The calculated intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.79 for optimism, 0.77 for pessimism, 0.76 for anxiety, and 0.79 for depression indicated that our psychological measures had a high degree of stability over time (10 years). Correlations among the psychological measures are provided in Web Table 5. With optimism recoded for congruence, the standardized Cronbach's alpha was 0.72 for the measures.

Table 1.

Descriptive Characteristics of Men in the VA Normative Aging Study at Baseline, Boston, Massachusetts, 1999–2009

GCRa Analysis (n = 699)
iNOSa Analysis (n = 627)
No. % Mean (SD) No. % Mean (SD)
Age, years 71.9 (6.8) 71.8 (6.8)
Race
 White 672 96.1 604 96.3
 Black 13 2.0 11 1.8
 Hispanic White 5 0.7 5 0.8
 Hispanic Black 1 0.1 1 0.2
 Unknown 8 1.1 6 0.9
Body mass indexb 28.3 (4.1) 28.1 (4.2)
Smoking status
 Never smoker 198 28.3 171 27.3
 Former smoker 471 67.4 433 69.1
 Current smoker 30 4.3 23 3.7
Cumulative smoking, pack-yearsc 21.2 (25.3) 21.7 (25.5)
Alcohol consumption, drinks/day
  < 2 565 80.8 505 80.5
  ≥ 2 128 18.3 114 18.2
 Unknown 6 0.9 8 1.3
Taking antihypertensive medication 412 58.9 387 61.7
Ischemic heart disease 213 30.5 195 31.1
Diabetes mellitus 125 17.9 114 18.2
Highest level of education, years 15.0 (3.0) 15.0 (3.0)

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

a GCR, glucocorticoid receptor gene; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase gene.

b Body mass index: weight (kg)/height (m)2.

c Among current or former smokers.

Table 2.

Air Pollution Characteristics, Boston, Massachusetts, 1999–2009

Moving Average Black Carbon, μg/m3
PM2.5, μg/m3
Mean IQR Mean IQR
4-hour 1.26 0.92 11.56 7.57
1-day 0.84 0.55 10.51 6.86
2-day 0.80 0.49 10.39 6.25
3-day 0.75 0.46 10.17 5.46
4-day 0.72 0.38 10.11 5.26
5-day 0.73 0.35 10.15 4.57
6-day 0.75 0.34 10.13 4.47
7-day 0.76 0.34 10.12 4.21
2-week 0.76 0.29 10.15 3.63
4-week 0.76 0.27 10.18 3.32

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; PM2.5, particulate matter less than 2.5 µm in diameter.

After forcing the aforementioned a priori chosen covariates into our models, we found that a stepwise selection procedure additionally identified diabetes mellitus status, body mass index, and hypertension medication as important predictors of iNOS methylation and diabetes mellitus status and race as important predictors of GCR methylation. Increased exposure to both black carbon and PM2.5 was associated with decreased iNOS methylation. For each pollutant, both a short response and an intermediate response were observed, with statistically significant associations for exposure during the 4-hour period preceding the examination and during the 1–4 weeks preceding it (Table 3). There was no association between increased exposure to either black carbon or PM2.5 and GCR methylation (Table 3). In models for iNOS methylation that simultaneously included a short exposure period and an intermediate period, only the short exposure for PM2.5 remained statistically significant, although both the short and intermediate exposures for black carbon persisted (Web Table 6). Our sensitivity analyses did not provide substantially different results from our main analyses (Web Tables 7–10).

Table 3.

Associations Between Air Pollution and Gene Promoter Methylation in the VA Normative Aging Study, 1999–2009

% Change in 5-Methylcytosine
Per 1 μg/m3 Black Carbon 95% Confidence Interval Per 10 μg/m3PM2.5 95% Confidence Interval
iNOSa,b
 4-hour −0.884 −1.385, −0.382 −0.577 −1.126, −0.029
 1-day −0.440 −1.352, 0.471 −0.390 −1.094, 0.314
 2-day −0.010 −1.147, 1.128 −0.250 −1.010, 0.510
 3-day 0.021 −1.330, 1.372 −0.258 −1.098, 0.582
 4-day −0.622 −2.181, 0.937 −0.554 −1.496, 0.388
 5-day −1.328 −3.064, 0.409 −0.877 −1.946, 0.192
 6-day −1.376 −3.276, 0.524 −1.068 −2.240, 0.104
 7-day −1.689 −3.738, 0.359 −1.327 −2.573, −0.081
 2-week −3.731 −6.402, −1.059 −1.550 −3.034, −0.065
 4-week −5.395 −8.941, −1.848 −1.477 −3.259, 0.306
GCRa,c
 4-hour −0.363 −0.789, 0.064 −0.135 −0.615, 0.345
 1-day −0.672 −1.519, 0.176 −0.351 −0.971, 0.269
 2-day −0.865 −1.898, 0.168 −0.516 −1.190, 0.157
 3-day −1.051 −2.285, 0.184 −0.521 −1.270, 0.229
 4-day −1.407 −2.830, 0.015 −0.627 −1.482, 0.228
 5-day −0.899 −2.470, 0.672 −0.500 −1.470, 0.469
 6-day −1.452 −3.160, 0.255 −0.688 −1.752, 0.377
 7-day −1.541 −3.357, 0.276 −0.850 −1.971, 0.271
 2-week −1.064 −3.422, 1.295 −0.790 −2.132, 0.552
 4-week −0.272 −3.403, 2.858 −0.787 −2.363, 0.788

Abbreviation: PM2.5, particulate matter less than 2.5 µm in diameter.

a GCR, glucocorticoid receptor gene; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase gene.

b Models were adjusted for baseline age, season, and time trend, apparent temperature, percent lymphocytes, percent neutrophils, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension medication.

c Models were adjusted for baseline age, season, and time trend, apparent temperature, percent lymphocytes, percent neutrophils, diabetes mellitus, and race.

Optimism, pessimism, anxiety, and depression were examined for interaction with both pollutants for iNOS methylation but not for GCR methylation, because there was no main association with either pollutant. There was interaction (P = 0.05) between black carbon and both anxiety and optimism. The final models included a cross-product term between each psychological measure and black carbon exposure in the preceding 4 hours, as well as adjustment by black carbon exposure in the preceding 2 weeks. Participants with low optimism scores had a decrease in iNOS methylation 3 times greater than those with high optimism scores (Table 4). Participants with high anxiety scores had a decrease in iNOS methylation 3 times greater than participants with low anxiety. There was also interaction (P = 0.05) between optimism and PM2.5. Participants with low optimism scores had a decrease in iNOS methylation 4 times greater than participants with high optimism. Interaction between PM2.5 and pessimism, depression, or anxiety was not statistically significant; however, for anxiety, there was a trend similar to that seen with optimism. The results were not materially different when the upper quartile of optimism and pessimism was used as a cutpoint instead of the median value.

Table 4.

Associations Between Acute Air Pollution Exposure and iNOSa Promoter Methylation by Psychological Factor in the Normative Aging Study, 1999–2009

4-Hour Exposure Period % Change in 5-Methylcytosine
Pinteraction % Change in 5-Methylcytosine
Pinteraction
Per 1 μg/m3 Black Carbonb 95% Confidence Interval Per 10 μg/m3 PMc2.5 95% Confidence Interval
High pessimism −1.005 −1.742, −0.268 0.867 −0.788 −1.532, −0.043 0.925
Low pessimism −0.924 −1.580, −0.269 −0.835 −1.593, −0.077
High optimism −0.480 −1.134, 0.173 0.048 −0.835 −1.593, −0.077 0.050
Low optimism −1.432 −2.168, −0.696 −1.267 −2.044, −0.490
High depression −0.833 −2.252, 0.586 0.878 −1.057 −2.335, 0.222 0.558
Low depression −0.950 −1.492, −0.407 −0.650 −1.254, −0.046
High anxiety −2.0976 −3.419, −0.777 0.053 −1.657 −2.893, −0.422 0.101
Low anxiety −0.6564 −1.203, −0.110 −0.548 −1.153, 0.057

Abbreviation: PM2.5, particulate matter less than 2.5 µm in diameter.

a iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase gene.

b Models were adjusted for baseline age, season, and time trend, apparent temperature, percent lymphocytes, percent neutrophils, and black carbon exposure in the 2 weeks prior to examination.

c Models were adjusted for baseline age, season, and time trend, apparent temperature, percent lymphocytes, and percent neutrophils.

DISCUSSION

We found that exposure to particulate air pollution was associated with decreased promoter methylation of iNOS but not of GCR. For iNOS, we saw associations with both short and intermediate exposure periods. This association was enhanced in individuals that were less optimistic and more anxious. Although gene expression was not measured in our study, methylation usually results in transcriptional suppression, while hypomethylation of regulatory sequences tends to correlate with gene expression (36).

Animal models have demonstrated that particles can induce inflammation and increase nitric oxide production (37). In addition, some animal and tissue studies have demonstrated an association between air pollution and DNA methylation (38, 39). Consistent with our findings, a study in rats demonstrated increased iNOS messenger RNA after exposure to particulate matter (40). Animal studies have also linked nitric oxide to psychological factors, such as stress and depression. In a study of white rats, chronic stress induced increases in iNOS expression in many parts of the brain (41). In an animal model that used chronic mild stress to mimic human depression, fluoexitine, an antidepressant, inhibited nitric oxide synthase overexpression (42).

Only a few epidemiologic studies have investigated the association between air pollution and DNA methylation. In the same cohort that we have investigated here, ambient particulate matter exposure was associated with repetitive element methylation (7, 9). Indoor stove coal usage has been associated with a higher rate of p16 promoter region methylation (43), and a study of foundry workers showed that exposure to particulate air pollution was associated with hypomethylation of the iNOS gene (8). Finally, prenatal tobacco smoke exposure was associated with changes in repetitive element and gene-specific methylation in a cohort of children (10). We know of no other epidemiologic studies that have looked at psychological factors and iNOS methylation specifically; however, a limited number of epidemiologic studies have reported associations between psychological factors and DNA methylation of other genes (20, 44, 45).

Similar to the study in foundry workers, our study found that the association between PM2.5 and iNOS was primarily a short-term association, although we also observed a persistent association between black carbon exposure in the previous 2 weeks and iNOS hypomethylation, beyond the acute association. In urban areas, black carbon derives primarily from exhaust emissions from vehicles (46), possibly reflecting different pathways or associations with particles of different characteristics.

We found that poor psychological functioning (i.e., more anxiety, less optimism) amplified the association between particulate matter exposure and decreased DNA methylation. Very few studies have examined the interaction between the physical and social environments, but there is limited evidence that such exposures act synergistically. In an animal model, higher air pollution exposure was associated with a rapid, shallow breathing pattern only in rats under chronic stress (47). Human epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that psychological stress may alter susceptibility to air pollution on respiratory outcomes (1113), as well as mental health outcomes (48). Building on prior research suggesting that optimism may buffer the effects of chronic stress (49) and that pessimism is associated with depressive and anxious symptoms (50), the current study expands the literature to consider potential synergism between environmental toxicants and poor psychological functioning beyond simple measures of stress.

A potential limitation of this study is the use of a single ambient monitor to characterize exposure, which can lead to exposure error when the pollutant is spatially heterogeneous. However, concentrations of PM2.5 have been shown to be homogeneous over a wide geographic region, and ambient PM2.5 measurements have been shown to be a good surrogate for personal exposures. In panel studies in Boston (51, 52), where participants were longitudinally followed, longitudinal variation in ambient PM2.5 concentrations was strongly correlated with corresponding personal PM2.5 exposures. With respect to a particular component of PM2.5, the spatial homogeneity may vary. Black carbon is moderately heterogeneous because of the numerous local sources (53). Classical measurement error tends to bias the effect downward, while Berkson measurement error tends to increase the standard error of the estimate. When looking at longitudinal variations in air pollution, we find that most error is of the Berkson type. To the extent that it is classical, simulation studies have shown that it is highly unlikely to bias away from the null even in the presence of covariates (54). Thus, any measurement error in our black carbon exposure metric would likely attenuate the true association. Given that we found significant associations for black carbon, it is unlikely that this error would qualitatively change our conclusions.

Our measurement of DNA methylation has some limitations. The methylation analyses were performed on white blood cell DNA. To what extent the change we observed in white blood cell DNA reflects similar modification of DNA methylation in target tissue is unclear. However, white blood cells regulate the systemic response to inflammation and, given that inflammation is a relevant mechanism in the relation we examined, measurements in white blood cells may be appropriate. We were unable to measure the expression of iNOS- and GCR-encoded RNAs and proteins in this cohort; however, other studies provide evidence that methylation of iNOS is functional (55). Thus, although the potential role of hypomethylation in response to the exposure remains speculative in our cohort, it is important to note that small changes in DNA methylation may be clinically meaningful. In the same cohort as we investigated here, decreased iNOS methylation was associated with decreased lung function (56). We saw stronger associations for longer periods of exposure versus acute exposure periods in this study, particularly for black carbon, suggesting the possibility of cumulative effects (at least over short periods of time). Given that air pollution exposure is ubiquitous and is often high in the same populations that are under high psychological burden (14), we believe that even small changes in DNA methylation may be important for understanding the interrelation between such exposures and morbidity.

As with any observational study, the possibility of residual confounding exists. Because we investigated a time-varying exposure, we adjusted for several potential time-varying confounders (i.e., age, time trend, temperature, and season) and included a random intercept for each subject in our mixed-effects models. This should minimize unmeasured, time-invariant confounding across subjects. Our measures of optimism, pessimism, anxiety, and depression symptoms were all self-reported; however, we used validated instruments with known characteristics, and these measures had excellent reliability in this cohort (57). Although we analyzed multiple moving averages of pollutant exposure, we note that these comparisons are not completely independent hypotheses but, rather, are testing a pattern of association. Nonetheless, multiple comparisons were performed, and we urge cautious interpretation of these findings within the context of the broader body of scientific literature. Finally, this study was limited to a cohort of elderly, almost entirely white, men. The elderly, black people, and women have been found to be more susceptible to air pollution exposure (58). Therefore, our findings may not apply to other populations.

The present study indicates that ambient air pollution exposure is associated with promoter hypomethylation of iNOS. Individuals reporting poorer psychological functioning may be particularly susceptible to these effects. This study provides preliminary evidence that such physical and psychological stressors may work through shared mechanistic pathways and, hence, the burden of one of these stressors may alter the ability to adapt to another. Further work is needed to clarify the complex interplay between physical and psychological stressors on epigenetic programming and human health.

Supplementary Material

Web Appendix

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Author affiliations: The Earth Institute and Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York (Jaime Madrigano); Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Murray A. Mittleman, Joel Schwartz); Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Jaime Madrigano, Andrea Baccarelli, Joel Schwartz); Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Laura Kubzansky); The Center of Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology, IRCCS Ca' Granda Maggiore Policlinico Hospital Foundation and Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy (Laura Cantone); The Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Murray A. Mittleman); The VA Normative Aging Study, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts (David Sparrow, Avron Spiro III, Pantel S. Vokonas); The Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (David Sparrow); Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts (David Sparrow, Pantel S. Vokonas); Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts (Avron Spiro III); and Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Avron Spiro III).

This work was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences at the National Institutes of Health (T32ES07069, ES0002, ES015172-01, ES014663, T32ES016645, and AG018436) and the VA Merit Review and the VA Research Career Scientist Award. The VA Normative Aging Study is supported by the Cooperative Studies Program/Epidemiology Research and Information Center of the US Department of Veterans Affairs and is a component of the Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

This work was performed while Jaime Madrigano was a doctoral candidate in the Departments of Epidemiology and Environmental Health at the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Schwartz J. Air pollution and hospital admissions for heart disease in eight U.S. counties. Epidemiology. 1999;10(1):17–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Samet JM, Dominici F, Curriero FC, et al. Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987–1994. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(24):1742–1749. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012143432401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pogribny IP, Beland FA. DNA hypomethylation in the origin and pathogenesis of human diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66(14):2249–2261. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0015-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baccarelli A, Wright R, Bollati V, et al. Ischemic heart disease and stroke in relation to blood DNA methylation. Epidemiology. 2010;21(6):819–828. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181f20457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Turunen MP, Aavik E, Ylä-Herttuala S. Epigenetics and atherosclerosis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1790(9):886–891. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Terry MB, Delgado-Cruzata L, Vin-Raviv N, et al. DNA methylation in white blood cells: association with risk factors in epidemiologic studies. Epigenetics. 2011;6(7):828–837. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.7.16500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baccarelli A, Wright RO, Bollati V, et al. Rapid DNA methylation changes after exposure to traffic particles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(7):572–578. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200807-1097OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tarantini L, Bonzini M, Apostoli P, et al. Effects of particulate matter on genomic DNA methylation content and iNOS promoter methylation. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(2):217–222. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Madrigano J, Baccarelli A, Mittleman MA, et al. Prolonged exposure to particulate pollution, genes associated with glutathione pathways, and DNA methylation in a cohort of older men. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(7):977–982. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Breton CV, Byun HM, Wenten M, et al. Prenatal tobacco smoke exposure affects global and gene-specific DNA methylation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(5):462–467. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200901-0135OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Clougherty JE, Levy JI, Kubzansky LD, et al. Synergistic effects of traffic-related air pollution and exposure to violence on urban asthma etiology. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(8):1140–1146. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen E, Schreier HM, Strunk RC, et al. Chronic traffic-related air pollution and stress interact to predict biologic and clinical outcomes in asthma. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(7):970–975. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shankardass K, McConnell R, Jerrett M, et al. Parental stress increases the effect of traffic-related air pollution on childhood asthma incidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(30):12406–12411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812910106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Clougherty JE, Kubzansky LD. A framework for examining social stress and susceptibility to air pollution in respiratory health. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(9):1351–1358. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bollati V, Baccarelli A. Environmental epigenetics. Heredity (Edinb) 2010;105(1):105–112. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2010.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kobayashi Y. The regulatory role of nitric oxide in proinflammatory cytokine expression during the induction and resolution of inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88(6):1157–1162. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0310149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smoak KA, Cidlowski JA. Mechanisms of glucocorticoid receptor signaling during inflammation. Mech Ageing Dev. 2004;125(10-11):697–706. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2004.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Munhoz CD, García-Bueno B, Madrigal JL, et al. Stress-induced neuroinflammation: mechanisms and new pharmacological targets. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2008;41(12):1037–1046. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2008001200001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miller GE, Chen E, Sze J, et al. A functional genomic fingerprint of chronic stress in humans: blunted glucocorticoid and increased NF-kappaB signaling. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;64(4):266–272. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Oberlander TF, Weinberg J, Papsdorf M, et al. Prenatal exposure to maternal depression, neonatal methylation of human glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1), and infant cortisol stress responses. Epigenetics. 2008;3(2):97–106. doi: 10.4161/epi.3.2.6034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bell B, Rose C, Damon A. The Normative Aging Study: an interdisciplinary and longitudinal study of health and aging. Aging Hum Dev. 1972;3(1):5–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Park SK, O'Neill MS, Vokonas PS, et al. Effects of air pollution on heart rate variability: the VA Normative Aging Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(3):304–309. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. Air pollution and emergency admissions in Boston, MA. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(10):890–895. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.039834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Scheier MF, Carver CS. Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychol. 1985;4(3):219–247. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.4.3.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N. The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med. 1983;13(3):595–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–428. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zanobetti A, Canner MJ, Stone PH, et al. Ambient pollution and blood pressure in cardiac rehabilitation patients. Circulation. 2004;110(15):2184–2189. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143831.33243.D8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mordukhovich I, Wilker E, Suh H, et al. Black carbon exposure, oxidative stress genes, and blood pressure in a repeated-measures study. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(11):1767–1772. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Madrigano J, Baccarelli A, Wright RO, et al. Air pollution, obesity, genes and cellular adhesion molecules. Occup Environ Med. 2010;67(5):312–317. doi: 10.1136/oem.2009.046193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zeka A, Sullivan JR, Vokonas PS, et al. Inflammatory markers and particulate air pollution: characterizing the pathway to disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(5):1347–1354. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. Temperature and mortality in nine US cities. Epidemiology. 2008;19(4):563–570. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31816d652d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhu ZZ, Hou L, Bollati V, et al. Predictors of global methylation levels in blood DNA of healthy subjects: a combined analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:126–139. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq154. ( doi:10.1093/ije/dyq154) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tindle HA, Chang YF, Kuller LH, et al. Optimism, cynical hostility, and incident coronary heart disease and mortality in the Women's Health Initiative. Circulation. 2009;120(8):656–662. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.827642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Giltay EJ, Geleijnse JM, Zitman FG, et al. Dispositional optimism and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a prospective cohort of elderly Dutch men and women. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61(11):1126–1135. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.11.1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rajan P, Kelsey KT, Schwartz JD, et al. Lead burden and psychiatric symptoms and the modifying influence of the δ-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) polymorphism: the VA Normative Aging Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(12):1400–1408. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Richardson B. Impact of aging on DNA methylation. Ageing Res Rev. 2003;2(3):245–261. doi: 10.1016/s1568-1637(03)00010-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li XY, Gilmour PS, Donaldson K, et al. Free radical activity and pro-inflammatory effects of particulate air pollution (PM10) in vivo and in vitro. Thorax. 1996;51(12):1216–1222. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.12.1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yauk C, Polyzos A, Rowan-Carroll A, et al. Germ-line mutations, DNA damage, and global hypermethylation in mice exposed to particulate air pollution in an urban/industrial location. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(2):605–610. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705896105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hou M, Morishita Y, Iljima T, et al. DNA methylation and expression of p16INK4A gene in pulmonary adenocarcinoma and anthracosis in background lung. Int J Cancer. 1999;84(6):609–613. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991222)84:6<609::aid-ijc12>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ulrich MM, Alink GM, Kumarathasan P, et al. Health effects and time course of particulate matter on the cardiopulmonary system in rats with lung inflammation. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2002;65(20):1571–1595. doi: 10.1080/00984100290071676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Khovryakov AV, Podrezova EP, Kruglyakov PP, et al. Involvement of the NO synthase system in stress-mediated brain reactions. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2010;40(3):333–337. doi: 10.1007/s11055-010-9260-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Luo L, Tan RX. Fluoxetine inhibits dendrite atrophy of hippocampal neurons by decreasing nitric oxide synthase expression in rat depression model. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2001;22(10):865–870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang AH, Bin HH, Pan XL, et al. Analysis of p16 gene mutation, deletion and methylation in patients with arseniasis produced by indoor unventilated-stove coal usage in Guizhou, China. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007;70(11):970–975. doi: 10.1080/15287390701290808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Uddin M, Aiello AE, Wildman DE, et al. Epigenetic and immune function profiles associated with posttraumatic stress disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(20):9470–9475. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910794107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Uddin M, Koenen KC, Aiello AE, et al. Epigenetic and inflammatory marker profiles associated with depression in a community-based epidemiologic sample. Psychol Med. 2011;41(5):997–1007. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710001674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Janssen NA, Schwartz J, Zanobetti A, et al. Air conditioning and source-specific particles as modifiers of the effect of PM(10) on hospital admissions for heart and lung disease. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(1):43–49. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0211043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Clougherty JE, Rossi CA, Lawrence J, et al. Chronic social stress and susceptibility to concentrated ambient fine particles in rats. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(6):769–775. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Evans GW, Jacobs SV, Dooley D, et al. The interaction of stressful life events and chronic strains on community mental health. Am J Community Psychol. 1987;15(1):23–34. doi: 10.1007/BF00919755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Riolli L, Savicki V. Optimism and coping as moderators of the relationship between chronic stress and burnout. Psychol Rep. 2003;92(3 pt 2):1215–1226. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3c.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chang EC, Bridewell WB. Irrational beliefs, optimism, pessimism, and psychological distress: a preliminary examination of differential effects in a college population. J Clin Psychol. 1998;54(2):137–142. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199802)54:2<137::aid-jclp2>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Koutrakis P, Suh HH, Sarnat JA, et al. Characterization of particulate and gas exposures of sensitive subpopulations living in Baltimore and Boston. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2005;(131):1–65. discussion 67–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sarnat JA, Brown KW, Schwartz J, et al. Ambient gas concentrations and personal particulate matter exposures: implications for studying the health effects of particles. Epidemiology. 2005;16(3):385–395. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000155505.04775.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Park SK, O'Neill MS, Wright RO, et al. HFE genotype, particulate air pollution, and heart rate variability: a gene-environment interaction. Circulation. 2006;114(25):2798–2805. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.643197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zeger SL, Thomas D, Dominici F, et al. Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(5):419–426. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chan GC, Fish JE, Mawji IA, et al. Epigenetic basis for the transcriptional hyporesponsiveness of the human inducible nitric oxide synthase gene in vascular endothelial cells. J Immunol. 2005;175(6):3846–3861. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.6.3846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lepeule J, Baccarelli A, Motta V, et al. Gene promoter methylation is associated with lung function in the elderly: the Normative Aging Study. Epigenetics. 2012;7(3):261–269. doi: 10.4161/epi.7.3.19216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mroczek DK, Spiro A, III, Aldwin CM, et al. Construct validation of optimism and pessimism in older men: findings from the Normative Aging Study. Health Psychol. 1993;12(5):406–409. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.12.5.406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Medina-Ramón M. Schwartz J. Who is more vulnerable to die from ozone air pollution? Epidemiology. 2008;19(5):672–679. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181773476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Web Appendix

Articles from American Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES