Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether the inflammatory milieu and/or hypoxia induces the dedifferentiation of synovial cells into mesenchymal stem-like cells, which may contribute to the tumor-like growth of synovial cells. Expression of mesenchymal stem cell markers (CD24, CD44, CD90, CD106, CD146 and Stro-1) was compared among cultured fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA), bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM MSCs) and normal dermal fibroblasts. After the cells were stimulated with pro-inflammatory cytokines for 3 days under hypoxia or normoxia, the stem cell markers were analyzed by FACS. CD44 and CD90 were expressed constitutively in all four cell types. Only the BM MSCs strongly expressed CD146. The expression of stem cell markers was similar between FLSs from RA and those from OA patients. In addition, the expression levels in FLSs were similar to those in normal dermal fibroblasts. The stimulation of FLSs and dermal fibroblasts with IL-1β or a mixture of cytokines under hypoxia did not induce a marked change in the expression of stem cell markers. These results indirectly suggest that the pro-inflammatory milieu may be not sufficient to induce the dedifferentiation of FLSs in arthritic joints.
Keywords: dedifferentiation, fibroblast-like synoviocytes, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell, dermis, stem cell markers
Introduction
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by the proliferation of fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) in affected joints. The onset of RA causes dramatic morphological changes in the synovial membrane, including thickening of the intimal lining. In addition, the FLSs in RA produce various cytokines and chemokines that recruit more immune cells into the joint cavities, and immune cells infiltrate into the proliferating synovial membranes, forming a pannus that exhibits aggressive, tumor-like growth and invades and erodes the cartilage and subchondral bone (1). The FLSs in the pannus resemble immature, transformed fibroblasts and are, in many ways, different from normal FLSs (e.g., invasiveness and cartilage degradation) (2,3). The mechanisms underlying the tumor-like phenotype of FLSs in RA are poorly understood. Many attempts have been made to explain the phenotype by dedifferentiation of normal FLSs, presumably through an accumulation of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities similar to cancer (4). A number of proto-oncogenes, including myc, ras and fos, are overexpressed in the FLSs of RA (5), but no common genetic abnormalities have been identified in these genes. Somatic mutations in the tumor-suppressor gene p53 are associated with RA (6), but a role for these mutations in the ‘pseudotransformed’ FLS phenotype is not known. Slowing of the rapid growth of FLSs after passage in culture is also against the ‘transformation’ hypothesis (7).
The pannus is comprised of many cell types, including inflammatory, immune and mesenchymal cells. A fraction of the heterogeneous FLS population in RA was recently found to have properties usually associated with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). When appropriately stimulated in culture, a proportion of the FLSs differentiates into chondrocytes, osteoblasts, adipocytes and muscle cells (8,9). Animal studies have shown that bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells (BM MSCs) appear to contribute to synovial proliferation (10,11). By contrast, local inflammatory cytokines suppress the differentiation of MSCs in RA-affected joints (12,13). Thus, arthritic FLSs have been suggested to contain a substantial fraction of BM MSCs, but they are under-differentiated because of the inflammatory milieu in arthritic joints (14). Inflammatory milieu and hypoxia are characteristic of arthritic joints. The inflammatory milieu may induce the dedifferentiation of terminally differentiated cells (e.g., chondrocytes) in arthritic joints (15). In addition, inflammation-induced hypoxia may induce the redifferentiation of dedifferentiated chondrocytes (16).
In this study, to better understand the tumor-like phenotypes of arthritic FLSs, we investigated whether inflammatory stimuli and hypoxia in arthritic joints induce the dedifferentiation of FLSs into mesenchymal stem-like cells, and whether the dedifferentiated FLSs contribute to the tumor-like phenotypes of RA FLSs. We compared the expression of MSC surface markers on fibroblasts from RA and osteoarthritis (OA) patients, dermal fibroblasts and bone marrow. In addition, we examined whether synovial or dermal fibroblasts exposed to inflammatory stimuli and hypoxia have altered expression of MSC surface markers.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
All in vitro experiments were carried out with FLSs derived from patients with RA or OA who met the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria for diagnosis, had been treated with non-biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and underwent therapeutic joint surgery. The synovial tissues were collected from patients after obtaining informed consent. The FLSs were isolated and grown in Dulbecco's modified essential medium (DMEM; low glucose; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen) and 1X antibiotic-antimycotic (Invitrogen).
Normal dermal fibroblasts were purchased from Modern Cell and Tissue Technologies (Seoul, Korea) and cultured in DMEM (high glucose). When the cells had grown to confluence, they were detached using cell dissociation buffer (Invitrogen) and split at a 1:3 ratio. FLSs from 3 patients at passage 3 were used in all experiments.
To test the effect of pro-inflammatory cytokines on dedifferentiation of cells, the cells were cultured for 3 days in the presence or absence of pro-inflammatory cytokines. For hypoxic effect, hypoxic conditions were generated by incubating the cells at 2% O2 in a hypoxic chamber gassed with a combination of N2 and CO2 (Invivo2 200; Ruskinn Technology Ltd., Pencoed, UK).
BM MSCs were purchased from Innomedi (Seoul, Korea). The BM MSCs were expanded for 9–11 days in 100-mm culture dishes, and then re-plated in 150-mm culture dishes with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen) at a density of 5×105 cells. FACS analysis was performed after culturing for 15 days. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Research of Kyung Hee University Hospital at Kangdong.
FACS analysis of stem cell markers
The FLSs were treated with cell dissociation buffer (Invitrogen) for 20 min in a 37˚C incubator and filtered through a 40-μm cell strainer. The dissociated cells (2×105 cells) were resuspended immediately in PBA (1% bovine serum albumin, 0.02% NaN3 in PBS, pH 7.4) and incubated with phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-CD24 (BD Biosciences, Seoul, Korea), anti-CD44 (BD Biosciences), anti-CD90 (BD Biosciences), anti-CD106 (BD Biosciences), anti-CD146 (BD Biosciences) and anti-STRO-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 30 min at 4˚C. After washing with PBA, the propidium iodide (PI)-negative cells were analyzed for antibody binding using FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) and Cell Quest software (BD Biosciences).
Results
The MSC surface markers CD44 and CD90 were expressed constitutively in all four cell types (Fig. 1). Only BM MSCs expressed CD146. None of the cells expressed CD24. The expression in FLSs from RA patients was distinctly different from that of normal dermal fibroblasts. Unexpectedly, the expression of stem cell markers in FLSs from RA patients was similar to that of FLSs from OA patients. One reason for the lack of difference may be the in vitro cell culture. The expression of stem cell markers may disappear during cell culture under conditions lacking inflammation. To evaluate this limitation, the FLSs from OA patients and normal dermal fibroblasts were cultured for 72 h in the presence or absence of 10 ng/ml IL-1β and the stem cell markers were compared to those of unstimulated FLSs. As shown in Fig. 2, the expression of CD24, CD44 and CD90 was similar regardless of IL-1β stimulation. The expression of CD106, CD146 and Stro-1 was also not significantly different in response to IL-1β stimulation. Next, we investigated whether the expression pattern was affected when the cells were cultured under hypoxic conditions (2% O2 concentration), which is one of the factors affecting the expression of various genes in inflammatory arthritic joints. The FLSs from RA patients were cultured for 72 h with IL-1β (10 ng/ml) or a combination of cytokines (1 ng/ml each IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-17, IL-22 and IL-23) in the presence or absence of hypoxia (Fig. 3). The MSC markers in the RA FLSs were not significantly different in the presence of pro-inflammatory stimulation or under hypoxic conditions.
Discussion
We investigated whether the MSC markers in FLSs from RA patients indicated dedifferentiation into MSCs in response to pro-inflammatory cytokines or hypoxic conditions, as this dedifferentiation may contribute to the tumor-like growth of synoviocytes in RA during progressive inflammation. Thus, we compared the expression of MSC surface markers (CD24, CD44, CD90, CD106, CD146 and Stro-1) on FLSs from RA or OA patients, dermal fibroblasts and BM MSCs. However, we did not identify any significant changes in response to pro-inflammatory stimulation or hypoxic conditions.
Extensive analyses have identified MSC surface markers in rat, mice and humans (17–20). Human MSCs have been reported to be positive for CD44, CD90 and CD105, and negative for CD14, CD34 and CD45 (20). Other cell markers, such as CD106, CD146 and Stro-1, are also expressed on the surface of MSCs (21), but their expression patterns change depending on the culture conditions or specific types of stimulation (22–24). Surface markers are also down-regulated with passaging (25). By contrast, the stem cell markers in chondrocyte dedifferentiation have been employed in autologous chondrocyte implantation (26). Chondrocytes isolated from a small biopsy of hyaline cartilage are expanded ex vivo, and once a sufficient number of cells are obtained, the chondrocytes are then implanted in the cartilage defect. However, the proliferating chondrocytes gradually lose their differentiated phenotype. These phenotypic changes lead to the production of an extracellular matrix with inferior biomechanical properties. For tissue, such as cartilage, high quality biomechanical properties are critical. Therefore, investigating parameters that favor the redifferentiation of dedifferentiated chondrocytes before implantation is critical. Thus, the stem cell markers are investigated to determine phenotypic changes. However, the stem cell marker changes in FLSs in RA during FLS dedifferentiation have been rarely studied.
In this study, we attempted to find the parameters or conditions that favor the dedifferentiation of FLSs, which may lead to being able to control or inhibit the ‘tumor-like growth’ of the synovial membrane of patients with RA. However, the in vitro system in this study has limitations. Thus, we tried to mimic the in vivo pro-inflammatory conditions, yet it was still likely not enough to meet the in vivo conditions. In addition, our in vitro systems may impair the dedifferentiation of FLSs since the differentiation potential of cultured cells decreases after every passage (27,28). Thus, the cell surface markers may not have been significantly altered by the pro-inflammatory cytokines and/or hypoxia due to unknown factors in the cell culture. We also examined whether cell passage affects the expression of stem cell markers. The stem cell markers of FLSs at the second passage were compared to those of the sixth passage when the FLSs were prepared at the same time. Cell passage did not appear to affect the expression pattern of the stem cell markers in FLSs, even in response to cytokine stimulation (data not shown). In conclusion, these results indirectly suggest that the pro-inflammatory milieu may not induce the dedifferentiation of FLSs in arthritic joints.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (2011-0009061 to KSK; 2011-0002659 and 2011-0027795 to CJR).
References
- 1.Firestein GS. Evolving concepts of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature. 2003;423:356–361. doi: 10.1038/nature01661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pap T, Muller-Ladner U, Gay RE, Gay S. Fibroblast biology. Role of synovial fibroblasts in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. 2000;2:361–367. doi: 10.1186/ar113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Edwards JC. Fibroblast biology. Development and differentiation of synovial fibroblasts in arthritis. Arthritis Res. 2000;2:344–347. doi: 10.1186/ar110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Firestein GS. Invasive fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis. Passive responders or transformed aggressors? Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39:1781–1790. doi: 10.1002/art.1780391103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Muller-Ladner U, Kriegsmann J, Gay RE, Gay S. Oncogenes in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1995;21:675–690. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yamanishi Y, Boyle DL, Rosengren S, Green DR, Zvaifler NJ, Firestein GS. Regional analysis of p53 mutations in rheumatoid arthritis synovium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:10025–10030. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152333199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lafyatis R, Remmers EF, Roberts AB, Yocum DE, Sporn MB, Wilder RL. Anchorage-independent growth of synoviocytes from arthritic and normal joints. Stimulation by exogenous platelet-derived growth factor and inhibition by transforming growth factor-beta and retinoids. J Clin Invest. 1989;83:1267–1276. doi: 10.1172/JCI114011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yamasaki S, Nakashima T, Kawakami A, et al. Cytokines regulate fibroblast-like synovial cell differentiation to adipocyte-like cells. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43:448–452. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zvaifler NJ, Tsai V, Alsalameh S, von Kempis J, Firestein GS, Lotz M. Pannocytes: distinctive cells found in rheumatoid arthritis articular cartilage erosions. Am J Pathol. 1997;150:1125–1138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nakagawa S, Toritsuka Y, Wakitani S, et al. Bone marrow stromal cells contribute to synovial cell proliferation in rats with collagen induced arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1996;23:2098–2103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marinova-Mutafchieva L, Williams RO, Funa K, Maini RN, Zvaifler NJ. Inflammation is preceded by tumor necrosis factor-dependent infiltration of mesenchymal cells in experimental arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:507–513. doi: 10.1002/art.10126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Murakami S, Lefebvre V, de Crombrugghe B. Potent inhibition of the master chondrogenic factor Sox9 gene by interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:3687–3692. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.5.3687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gilbert L, He X, Farmer P, et al. Expression of the osteoblast differentiation factor RUNX2 (Cbfa1/AML3/Pebp2alpha A) is inhibited by tumor necrosis factor-alpha. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:2695–2701. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106339200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li X, Makarov SS. An essential role of NF-kappaB in the ‘tumor-like’ phenotype of arthritic synoviocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:17432–17437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607939103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wehling N, Palmer GD, Pilapil C, et al. Interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibit chondrogenesis by human mesenchymal stem cells through NF-kappaB-dependent pathways. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:801–812. doi: 10.1002/art.24352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Duval E, Leclercq S, Elissalde JM, Demoor M, Galera P, Boumediene K. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha inhibits the fibroblast-like markers type I and type III collagen during hypoxia-induced chondrocyte redifferentiation: hypoxia not only induces type II collagen and aggrecan, but it also inhibits type I and type III collagen in the hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha-dependent redifferentiation of chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:3038–3048. doi: 10.1002/art.24851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Javazon EH, Colter DC, Schwarz EJ, Prockop DJ. Rat marrow stromal cells are more sensitive to plating density and expand more rapidly from single-cell-derived colonies than human marrow stromal cells. Stem Cells. 2001;19:219–225. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.19-3-219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Eslaminejad MB, Nikmahzar A, Taghiyar L, Nadri S, Massumi M. Murine mesenchymal stem cells isolated by low density primary culture system. Dev Growth Differ. 2006;48:361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2006.00874.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Docheva D, Popov C, Mutschler W, Schieker M. Human mesenchymal stem cells in contact with their environment: surface characteristics and the integrin system. J Cell Mol Med. 2007;11:21–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00001.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284:143–147. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Steinert AF, Kunz M, Prager P, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell characteristics of human anterior cruciate ligament outgrowth cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:1375–1388. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang JW, de Isla N, Huselstein C, et al. Evaluation of human MSCs cell cycle, viability and differentiation in micromass culture. Biorheology. 2006;43:489–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wiesmann A, Buhring HJ, Mentrup C, Wiesmann HP. Decreased CD90 expression in human mesenchymal stem cells by applying mechanical stimulation. Head Face Med. 2006;2:8. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-2-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Honczarenko M, Le Y, Swierkowski M, Ghiran I, Glodek AM, Silberstein LE. Human bone marrow stromal cells express a distinct set of biologically functional chemokine receptors. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1030–1041. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Halfon S, Abramov N, Grinblat B, Ginis I. Markers distinguishing mesenchymal stem cells from fibroblasts are downregulated with passaging. Stem Cells Dev. 2011;20:53–66. doi: 10.1089/scd.2010.0040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee HJ, Choi BH, Min BH, Park SR. Changes in surface markers of human mesenchymal stem cells during the chondrogenic differentiation and dedifferentiation processes in vitro. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:2325–2332. doi: 10.1002/art.24786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Digirolamo CM, Stokes D, Colter D, Phinney DG, Class R, Prockop DJ. Propagation and senescence of human marrow stromal cells in culture: a simple colony-forming assay identifies samples with the greatest potential to propagate and differentiate. Br J Haematol. 1999;107:275–281. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sekiya I, Colter DC, Prockop DJ. BMP-6 enhances chondrogenesis in a subpopulation of human marrow stromal cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;284:411–418. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.4898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]