Skip to main content
Plant Signaling & Behavior logoLink to Plant Signaling & Behavior
. 2012 Oct 1;7(10):1263–1266. doi: 10.4161/psb.21662

The rice ASR5 protein

A putative role in the response to aluminum photosynthesis disturbance

Rafael Augusto Arenhart 1, Rogério Margis 1,2, Marcia Margis-Pinheiro 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC3493409  PMID: 22902685

Abstract

Under acidic soil conditions, aluminum (Al) becomes available to plants, which must cope with its toxicity by mechanisms involving both internal and external detoxification. Rice is the most Al-tolerant among the crop species, with Al detoxification being managed by both mechanisms. Recently, we focused on ASR (Abscisic acid, Stress and Ripening) gene expression analyses and observed increased ASR5 transcript levels in roots and shoots in response to Al. In addition, ASR5 RNAi knock down plants presented an Al-sensitive phenotype. A proteomic approach showed that ASR5 silencing affected several proteins related to photosynthesis in RNAi rice shoots. Furthermore, an ASR5-GFP fusion in rice protoplasts revealed for the first time a chloroplast localization of this protein. Because it is well known that Al induces photosynthetic dysfunction, here we discuss the hypothesis that ASR5 might be sequestered in the chloroplasts as an inactive transcription factor that could be released to the nucleus in response to Al to regulate genes related to photosynthesis.

Keywords: ASR, chloroplast, aluminum, transcription factor GFP


According to the FAO, aluminum (Al) toxicity is the most serious problem in the soil constraints on agriculture, second to erosion hazards.1 Al is a very abundant metal in the earth’s crust, but it becomes a problem under acidic conditions under which Al becomes soluble and is taken up by plants. Plants have developed strategies to cope with Al via internal and external detoxification systems. The release of organic acids that form complexes and prevent Al entry into cells has been well documented.2-4 However, some plants have managed to mediate Al by chelation and storage in the vacuoles.5,6 Among crops, rice is the most Al-tolerant species due to its capacity to cope with Al using both mechanisms.7,8 Although rice can exclude Al from the roots, a portion of the Al can enter the cells and be transported to the shoots.10

In recent years, different studies aiming to decipher Al-tolerance in rice permitted the identification of a few genes,9 and our previous work has added a new association between ASR genes (Abscisic acid, Stress and Ripening) and Al tolerance.11 The ASR genes are also involved in many abiotic and biotic stresses (for a review, see 12). The exact function, however, remains enigmatic as the possible roles of the ASR genes cannot be deduced by sequence homology with other known proteins.12 Most of the ASR proteins reported to date are located in the nucleus and possess DNA-binding activities. ASR from grape, for example, was able to bind to the promoter of a hexose transporter gene and regulate its expression.13 Selex-binding experiments showed that ASR1 from tomato exhibit DNA sequence-preferential binding.14 Furthermore, ASR1 from tomato was able to compete for the transcription factor ABI4 binding motif when overexpressed in Arabidopsis.15

We have previously shown that ASR5 transcripts are increased in response to Al in roots and shoots.11 ASR5_RNAi plants presented a high Al sensitivity and a trichome-less phenotype. In addition, a proteomic approach revealed several proteins of which the expression was affected in shoots due to the silencing of ASR5. Furthermore, we confirmed the nuclear localization of ASR5 using rice calli transformed with an ASR5_GFP fusion construct. However, when this construct was transformed in protoplasts, ASR5 was accumulated in the chloroplast precursors (etioplastids) of rice leaves protoplasts grown under dark conditions (Fig. 1A) and chloroplasts (Fig. 1B) of rice leaves protoplasts grown under light conditions. GFP alone was used as positive control (Fig. 1C). This new and intriguing localization for ASR5 led us to speculate that ASR5 plays a role in this organelle, most likely linking the signaling between the chloroplasts and nucleus and regulating the expression of chloroplast proteins. Al can enter rice chloroplasts16 and decrease the photosynthetic ratio.17,18 The ASR5 silencing affected the expression of at least 41 proteins in rice leaves.11 A total of 19 out of these 41 proteins contains the chloroplast transfer peptide (cTP) signal, as predicted by sequence analyses19,20 and, were found to be differentially expressed in our RNAi line. The identified proteins are involved in such processes as photosynthesis, electron transport and stress responses (Table 1). The overexpression of ASR5 (named ASR1 in the cited report) in rice, increased the tolerance to cold, and the plants presented approximately 2-fold higher Fv/Fm values for the photosynthetic efficiency when compared with non-transformed plants.21 Out of the 19 proteins with a cTP signal found in our plants, 14 were decreased in the ASR5_RNAi line and might be helpful to explain the Al sensitivity of the RNAi plant. These genes may be regulated by ASR5 in the nucleus because most of the proteins with cTP signals are encoded in the nuclear genome, translated in the cytosol and post-translationally imported into the chloroplasts.22

graphic file with name psb-7-1263-g1.jpg

Figure 1. Rice protoplast transformation with ASR5-GFP fusion. From upper to lower – The ref fluorescence of chlorophyll, ASR5-YFP fluorescence and merged images using a confocal laser scanning microscope. (a) Protoplast from rice leaves grown under dark conditions. (b) Protoplast from rice leaves grown under light conditions. (c) Vector with GFP only used as positive control. No green fluorescence was detected in negative control (data not shown). Bar = 10µM.

Table 1. Proteins differentially expressed in RNAi_ASR rice plants.

Function Expression Protein name Accession (NCBI)
Protein degradation
 
 
 
1

Heat shock protein 70
gi|222631026
2

Mitochondrial chaperonin
gi|115488160
Photosynthesis
 
 
 
3

ATP synthase gamma chain
gi|115472339
4

Putative oxygen-evolving enhancer protein
gi|115436780
5

Ferredoxin-NADP(H) oxidoreductase
gi|41052915
6

PSI reaction center subunit IV
gi|34394725
Carbohydrate metabolism
 
 
 
7

Putative transketolase
gi|28190676
8

Sedoheptulose 1–7 bisphosphatase
gi|27804768
9

Putative uridylyltransferase-related
gi|187608845
10

Ribulose-5-phosphate-3-epimerase
gi|4105561
Cellular component
 
 
 
11

Fibrillin-like protein
gi|29367475
12

PAP fibrillin family domain protein
gi|115486133
Amino acid metabolism
 
 
 
13

Putative glycine cleavage system H protein
gi|115482934
Stress response
 
 
 
14

Class III peroxidase (OsPrx111)
gi|20286
15

Chloroplastic lipocalin (Os04 g0626400)
gi|115460690
16

Putative superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn]
gi|42408425
Transport of electrons
 
 
 
17

Oxidoreductase NAD-binding domain
gi|115445869
18

2Fe-2S iron-sulfur cluster binding domain
gi|18698985
Nucleotide binding
 
 
 
19 Chloroplast elongation factor Tu gi|218191089

The proteins differentially expressed in transgenic rice shoots silenced for ASR5 with a chloroplast transfer peptide signal (cTP), as predicted by PCLR and ChloroP 1.1 software.

Our hypothesis is that ASR5 is stored inside the chloroplast until specific conditions (such as Al stress) require their activity in the nucleus; a scenario proposed for certain other dual-target transcription factors.23 For example, Whirly1 is localized in both the nucleus and plastids of the same cells in barley leaves.24

Curiously, the ASR5 N-terminal region lacks the expected cTP sequence required to target this protein to the chloroplast. Notwithstanding, in Arabidopsis chloroplast preparations, a total of 604 proteins encoded in the nuclear genome were found, and surprisingly, only 376 were predicted to have the cTP when analyzed by a chloroplast-targeting prediction tool.25 Proteins with cTP signals are targeted to the chloroplast surface and imported across the double-membrane envelope by translocons in the outer and inner envelope membranes, termed TOC and TIC, respectively.26 However, increasing evidence shows that some proteins can enter the chloroplast by a TOC-TIC independent pathway.27-29 The transcriptional responses to abrupt environmental changes often have to occur rapidly and might require a release of pre-produced inactive transcription factors. A controlled sequestering of proteins at intracellular membranes seems to be an established way of controlling gene expression and intracellular communication.23 Furthermore, a potential myristoylation site in rice ASR5 sequence is conserved among several ASR proteins at the same location when aligned.30 The myristoyl residue may bind to a hydrophobic pocket and thus confer structural stability to a protein.31 The most obvious function of the myristoyl moieties is to mediate membrane binding32 and is frequently found in proteins shuttling across membranes, where the myristoyl residue inserts into the inner lipid layer of the plasma membrane and facilitates membrane interaction.30

In tobacco, Al accumulated in the chloroplasts after entering the cells, reacted with or replaced the non-heme iron between the QA and QB binding sites and blocked PSII electron transport, resulting in PSII photochemical damage and the inhibition of photosynthesis.33 Thus, Al could be the signal for ASR5 release from the chloroplasts to regulate photosynthesis related gene expression and cope with Al toxicity in rice shoots.

Materials and Methods

The complete sequence of ASR5 was amplified using cDNA library of rice Japonica cultivar, sequenced and cloned fusionated with YFP coding sequence at its N-terminus into the Gateway vector pART7-YFP.34 Protoplast isolation was performed according to Chen et al. (2006)35 and protoplast transformation according to Tao et al. (2002).36 Transformed rice protoplasts grown under dark and under light conditions were incubated in the dark for 24–48 h at 27°C prior to imaging. Fluorescence microscopy was performed with an Olympus FluoView 1000 confocal laser-scanning microscope equipped with a set of filters capable of distinguishing green and yellow fluorescent proteins (EGFP and EYFP, respectively) and plastid autofluorescence. Images were captured with a high-sensitivity photomultiplier tube detector. A vector containing only GFP was used as positive control and an empty vector was used as a negative control. The experiment was performed in biological triplicate.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.Bot AJ, Nachtergaele FO, Young A. Land resource potential and constraints at regional and country level. F A O Land and Water Development Division, FAO, Rome 2000; Available at: http://www.fao.org/AG/agl/agll/terrastat
  • 2.Sasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Ezaki B, Katsuhara M, Ahn SJ, Ryan PR, et al. A wheat gene encoding an aluminum-activated malate transporter. Plant J. 2004;37:645–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2003.01991.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Jones D. Function and Mechanism of Organic Anion Exudation From Plant Roots. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001;52:527–60. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ma JF, Furukawa J. Recent progress in the research of external Al detoxification in higher plants: a minireview. J Inorg Biochem. 2003;97:46–51. doi: 10.1016/S0162-0134(03)00245-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Matsumoto H, Ma JF, Matsumoto H, Jian Zheng S. Feng Ma J High aluminum resistance in buckwheat. I. Al-induced specific secretion of oxalic acid from root tips. Plant Physiol. 1998;117:745–51. doi: 10.1104/pp.117.3.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ma JF, Hiradate S, Nomoto K, Iwashita T, Matsumoto H. Internal Detoxification Mechanism of Al in Hydrangea (Identification of Al Form in the Leaves) Plant Physiol. 1997;113:1033–9. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.4.1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Huang CF, Yamaji N, Mitani N, Yano M, Nagamura Y, Ma JF. A bacterial-type ABC transporter is involved in aluminum tolerance in rice. Plant Cell. 2009;21:655–67. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yokosho K, Yamaji N, Ma JF. An Al-inducible MATE gene is involved in external detoxification of Al in rice. Plant J. 2011;68:1061–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04757.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Delhaize E, Ma JF, Ryan PR. Transcriptional regulation of aluminium tolerance genes. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:341–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meriga B, Reddy BK, Rao KR, Reddy LA, Kishor PBK. Aluminium-induced production of oxygen radicals, lipid peroxidation and DNA damage in seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa). J Plant Physiol 2004;161:63-8; PMID: 15002665; DOI: 0176-1617/04/161/01-63. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Arenhart RA, Lima JC, Pedron M, Carvalho FEL, da Silveira JAG, Rosa SB, et al. Involvement of ASR genes in aluminum tolerance mechanisms in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2012;1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02553.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Virlouvet L, Jacquemot MP, Gerentes D, Corti H, Bouton S, Gilard F, et al. The ZmASR1 protein influences branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis and maintains kernel yield in maize under water-limited conditions. Plant Physiol. 2011;157:917–36. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.176818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Çakir B, Agasse A, Gaillard C, Saumonneau A, Delrot S, Atanassova R. A grape ASR protein involved in sugar and abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell. 2003;15:2165–80. doi: 10.1105/tpc.013854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kalifa Y, Gilad A, Konrad Z, Zaccai M, Scolnik PA, Bar-Zvi D. The water- and salt-stress regulated Asr1 gene encodes a zinc-dependent DNA-binding protein. Biochem J. 2004;•••:1–26. doi: 10.1042/BJ20031800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shkolnik D, Bar-Zvi D. Tomato ASR1 abrogates the response to abscisic acid and glucose in Arabidopsis by competing with ABI4 for DNA binding. Plant Biotechnol J. 2008;6:368–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00328.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jinqi L, Houtian L. Effect of aluminum on NAD kinase activity in chloroplast fraction from leaves of rice seedlings. J Environ Sci (China) 1995;7:24–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ali B, Hasan SA, Hayat S, Hayat Q, Yadav S, Fariduddin Q, et al. A role for brassinosteroids in the amelioration of aluminium stress through antioxidant system in mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) Environ Exp Bot. 2008;62:153–9. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.07.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang WH, Ryan PR, Tyerman SD. Malate-permeable channels and cation channels activated by aluminum in the apical cells of wheat roots. Plant Physiol. 2001;125:1459–72. doi: 10.1104/pp.125.3.1459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, von Heijne G. ChloroP, a neural network-based method for predicting chloroplast transit peptides and their cleavage sites. Protein Sci. 1999;8:978–84. doi: 10.1110/ps.8.5.978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schein AI, Kissinger JC, Ungar LH. Chloroplast transit peptide prediction: a peek inside the black box. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:E82. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.16.e82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim S-J, Lee SC, Hong SK, An K, An G, Kim SR. Ectopic expression of a cold-responsive OsAsr1 cDNA gives enhanced cold tolerance in transgenic rice plants. Mol Cells. 2009;27:449–58. doi: 10.1007/s10059-009-0055-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Soll J, Tien R. Protein translocation into and across the chloroplastic envelope membranes. Plant Mol Biol. 1998;38:191–207. doi: 10.1023/A:1006034020192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Krause K, Krupinska K. Nuclear regulators with a second home in organelles. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14:194–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Grabowski E, Miao Y, Mulisch M, Krupinska K. Single-stranded DNA-binding protein Whirly1 in barley leaves is located in plastids and the nucleus of the same cell. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:1800–4. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.122796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kleffmann T, Russenberger D, von Zychlinski A, Christopher W, Sjölander K, Gruissem W, et al. The Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplast proteome reveals pathway abundance and novel protein functions. Curr Biol. 2004;14:354–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bédard J, Jarvis P. Recognition and envelope translocation of chloroplast preproteins. J Exp Bot. 2005;56:2287–320. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nada A, Soll J. Inner envelope protein 32 is imported into chloroplasts by a novel pathway. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:3975–82. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reinbothe S, Mache R, Reinbothe C. A second, substrate-dependent site of protein import into chloroplasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:9795–800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.160242597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kim C, Ham H, Apel K. Multiplicity of different cell- and organ-specific import routes for the NADPH-protochlorophyllide oxidoreductases A and B in plastids of Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J. 2005;42:329–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vaidyanathan R, Kuruvilla S, Thomas G. Characterization and expression pattern of an abscisic acid and osmotic stress responsive gene from rice. Plant Sci. 1999;140:21–30. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00194-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zheng J, Knighton DR, Xuong NH, Taylor SS, Sowadski JM, Ten Eyck LF. Crystal structures of the myristylated catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase reveal open and closed conformations. Protein Sci. 1993;2:1559–73. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560021003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vergères G, Manenti S, Weber T, Stürzinger C. The myristoyl moiety of myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) and MARCKS-related protein is embedded in the membrane. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:19879–87. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.34.19879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li Z, Xing F, Xing D. Characterization of target site of aluminum phytotoxicity in photosynthetic electron transport by fluorescence techniques in tobacco leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:1295–309. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Galván-Ampudia CS, Offringa R. Plant evolution: AGC kinases tell the auxin tale. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12:541–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chen SB, Tao LZ, Zeng LR, Vega-Sanchez ME, Umemura K, Wang GL. A highly efficient transient protoplast system for analyzing defence gene expression and protein-protein interactions in rice. Mol Plant Pathol. 2006;7:417–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00346.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tao LZ, Cheung AY, Wu HM. Plant rac-like gtpases are activated by auxin and mediate auxin responsive gene expression. Plant Cell 2002; 14: 2745-2760; DOI: 10.1105/tpc.006320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Plant Signaling & Behavior are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES