Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1980 May;77(5):2748–2752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.5.2748

Density-dependent stimulation and inhibition of cell growth by agents that disrupt microtubules

Donald A McClain 1, Gerald M Edelman 1
PMCID: PMC349481  PMID: 6994105

Abstract

We have previously reported that agents that disrupt microtubules, such as colchicine, inhibit the growth stimulation of lymphocytes and arrested fibroblasts; other workers have recently reported enhanced stimulation of fibroblasts in the presence of the same drugs. In the present studies, we resolve this conflict by demonstrating that the stimulatory and inhibitory effects of microtubule disruption depend upon the density and the cell type of the treated cultures. Our analysis included an examination of three variables: (i) cell density (sparse or confluent), (ii) cell type (resting fibroblasts from mouse or chicken embryos or from the permanent 3T3 mouse fibroblast line), and (iii) treatment with colchicine and related drugs in the presence or absence of various mitogens such as serum, insulin, and epidermal growth factor. We found that colchicine augmented mitogenesis in confluent cultures of all cell types. Colchicine by itself appeared to be mitogenic only for confluent chicken embryo fibroblasts. In sparse cultures with minimal cell-cell contacts, however, there were differences between embryonic cells and the 3T3 cell line. In confirmation of our previous reports, disruption of microtubules by colchicine inhibited the mitogenic stimulation of sparse cultures of embryonic chicken or mouse fibroblasts. In contrast, fibroblasts of the permanent 3T3 line in sparse cultures were stimulated by some mitogens despite the presence of colchicine. The augmentative effects of colchicine on the stimulation of confluent cultures were synergistic with the mitogens, and colchicine allowed response to otherwise submitogenic doses of growth factors. Kinetic studies indicated that the stimulatory and inhibitory effects of colchicine are separable and that both can operate simultaneously. The experiments suggest that the regulation of growth by nutrient deprivation and the regulation by density dependence proceed at least in part by different mechanisms. All of the results suggest that microtubular integrity can be associated with the expression of either negative or positive controls on cell growth, depending upon the confluence or lineage of the cells in culture.

Keywords: cell cycle, growth control, colchicine, microtubules, contact inhibition

Full text

PDF
2748

Images in this article

2749Image
on p.2749
2749Image
on p.2749

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker M. E. Colchicine inhibits mitogenesis in C1300 neuroblastoma cells that have been arrested in G0. Nature. 1976 Aug 26;262(5571):785–786. doi: 10.1038/262785a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beebe D. C., Feagans D. E., Blanchette-Mackie E. J., Nau M. E. Lens epithelial cell elongation in the absence of microtubules: evidence for a new effect of colchicine. Science. 1979 Nov 16;206(4420):836–838. doi: 10.1126/science.493982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. De Brabander M. J., Van de Veire R. M., Aerts F. E., Borgers M., Janssen P. A. The effects of methyl (5-(2-thienylcarbonyl)-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl) carbamate, (R 17934; NSC 238159), a new synthetic antitumoral drug interfering with microtubules, on mammalian cells cultured in vitro. Cancer Res. 1976 Mar;36(3):905–916. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edelman G. M. Surface modulation in cell recognition and cell growth. Science. 1976 Apr 16;192(4236):218–226. doi: 10.1126/science.769162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edelman G. M., Yahara I. Temperature-sensitive changes in surface modulating assemblies of fibroblasts transformed by mutants of Rous sarcoma virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jun;73(6):2047–2051. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.2047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edelman G. M., Yahara I., Wang J. L. Receptor mobility and receptor-cytoplasmic interactions in lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 May;70(5):1442–1446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.5.1442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Friedkin M., Legg A., Rozengurt E. Antitubulin agents enhance the stimulation of DNA synthesis by polypeptide growth factors in 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Aug;76(8):3909–3912. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.8.3909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gunther G. R., Wang J. L., Edelman G. M. Kinetics of colchicine inhibition of mitogenesis in individual lymphocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1976 Mar 1;98(1):15–22. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90457-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McClain D. A., D'Eustachio P., Edelman G. M. Role of surface modulating assemblies in growth control of normal and transformed fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Feb;74(2):666–670. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.2.666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McClain D. A., Edelman G. M. Analysis of the stimulation-inhibition paradox exhibited by lymphocytes exposed to concanavalin A. J Exp Med. 1976 Dec 1;144(6):1494–1508. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.6.1494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Otto A. M., Zumbé A., Gibson L., Kubler A. M., Jimenez de Asua L. Cytoskeleton-disrupting drugs enhance effect of growth factors and hormones on initiation of DNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Dec;76(12):6435–6438. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.12.6435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Skehan P. On the regulation of cell growth in culture. Exp Cell Res. 1976 Jan;97:184–192. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90667-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. TODARO G. J., GREEN H. Quantitative studies of the growth of mouse embryo cells in culture and their development into established lines. J Cell Biol. 1963 May;17:299–313. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.2.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Teng M. H., Bartholomew J. C., Bissell M. J. Synergism between anti-microtubule agents and growth stimulants in enhancement of cell cycle traverse. Nature. 1977 Aug 25;268(5622):739–741. doi: 10.1038/268739a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vasiliev J. M., Gelfand I. M., Guelstein V. I. Initiation of DNA synthesis in cell cultures by colcemid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 May;68(5):977–979. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.5.977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Walker P. R., Boynton A. L., Whitfield J. F. The inhibition by colchicine of the initiation of DNA synthesis by hepatocytes in regenerating rat liver and by cultivated WI-38 and C3H10T1/2 cells. J Cell Physiol. 1977 Oct;93(1):89–97. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040930112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Whittenberger B., Glaser L. Inhibition of DNA synthesis in cultures of 3T3 cells by isolated surface membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jun;74(6):2251–2255. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wilson L., Friedkin M. The biochemical events of mitosis. I. Synthesis and properties of colchicine labeled with tritium in its acetyl moiety. Biochemistry. 1966 Jul;5(7):2463–2468. doi: 10.1021/bi00871a042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES