Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1980 Jun;77(6):3412–3416. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.6.3412

Chromatin repeat length correlates with phenotypic expression in hepatoma cells, their dedifferentiated variants, and somatic hybrids.

L Sperling, M C Weiss
PMCID: PMC349626  PMID: 6932027

Abstract

Chromatin repeat length is known to differ among the tissues of organisms. We have examined the repeat length of somatic cells in culture and have found an unexpected correlation between this parameter and the state of differentiation of the cells. Three sequentially derived subclones of a rat hepatoma, similar in phenotype, present a constant repeat length of 189 (+/- 1) base pairs. Three independent variant clones do not express hepatic functions and each has a different repeat length: 184 base pairs, 188 base pairs, and 192 base pairs. Somatic hybrids between the two types of cells in which liver functions are extinguished have a repeat length close or identical to that of the nonexpressing parent. In the case of one hybrid clone that reexpresses the liver phenotype and has undergone some chromosome loss, the 189-base-pair repeat length characteristic of the well-differentiated cells is reestablished. Finally, an amelanotic variant clone derived from a pigmented hamster melanoma clone also shows a signficantly altered repeat length. No correlations have been observed between repeat length and either generation time or chromosome number. Maintenance of the expression of differentiation therefore appears to be associated with a constant repeat length, and loss of the former with a modification in repeat length, suggesting that chromatin packaging is intimately involved in the regulation of gene expression.

Full text

PDF
3412

Images in this article

3413Image
on p.3413

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bertolotti R. Expression of differentiated functions in hepatoma cell hybrids: selection in glucose-free media of segregated hybrid cells which reexpress gluconeogenic enzymes. Somatic Cell Genet. 1977 Nov;3(6):579–602. doi: 10.1007/BF01539067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cassio D., Weiss M. C. Expression of fetal and neonatal hepatic functions by mouse hepatoma-rat hepatoma hybrids. Somatic Cell Genet. 1979 Nov;5(6):719–738. doi: 10.1007/BF01542637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Compton J. L., Bellard M., Chambon P. Biochemical evidence of variability in the DNA repeat length in the chromatin of higher eukaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Dec;73(12):4382–4386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.12.4382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coon H. G., Weiss M. C. A quantitative comparison of formation of spontaneous and virus-produced viable hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Mar;62(3):852–859. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.3.852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deschatrette J., Moore E. E., Dubois M., Cassio D., Weiss M. C. Dedifferentiated variants of a rat hepatoma: analysis by cell hybridization. Somatic Cell Genet. 1979 Nov;5(6):697–718. doi: 10.1007/BF01542636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Deschatrette J., Weiss M. C. Characterization of differentiated and dedifferentiated clones from a rat hepatoma. Biochimie. 1974;56(11-12):1603–1611. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(75)80286-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deschatrette J., Weiss M. C. Extinction of liver-specific functions in hybrids between differentiated and dedifferentiated rat hepatoma cells. Somatic Cell Genet. 1975 Jul;1(3):279–292. doi: 10.1007/BF01538451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FISCHER G. A. Studies of the culture of leukemic cells in vitro. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1958 Dec 5;76(3):673–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1958.tb54884.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HAM R. G. CLONAL GROWTH OF MAMMALIAN CELLS IN A CHEMICALLY DEFINED, SYNTHETIC MEDIUM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1965 Feb;53:288–293. doi: 10.1073/pnas.53.2.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Keppel F., Allet B., Eisen H. Appearance of a chromatin protein during the erythroid differentiation of Friend virus-transformed cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Feb;74(2):653–656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.2.653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kornberg R. D. Structure of chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:931–954. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.004435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LITTLEFIELD J. W. SELECTION OF HYBRIDS FROM MATINGS OF FIBROBLASTS IN VITRO AND THEIR PRESUMED RECOMBINANTS. Science. 1964 Aug 14;145(3633):709–710. doi: 10.1126/science.145.3633.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Morris N. R. A comparison of the structure of chicken erythrocyte and chicken liver chromatin. Cell. 1976 Dec;9(4 Pt 1):627–632. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(76)90045-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Newrock K. M., Cohen L. H., Hendricks M. B., Donnelly R. J., Weinberg E. S. Stage-specific mRNAs coding for subtypes of H2A and H2B histones in the sea urchin embryo. Cell. 1978 Jun;14(2):327–336. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90118-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Noll M., Kornberg R. D. Action of micrococcal nuclease on chromatin and the location of histone H1. J Mol Biol. 1977 Jan 25;109(3):393–404. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80019-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PITOT H. C., PERAINO C., MORSE P. A., Jr, POTTER V. R. HEPATOMAS IN TISSUE CULTURE COMPARED WITH ADAPTING LIVER IN VIVO. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1964 Apr;13:229–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Prunell A., Kornberg R. D. Relation of nucleosomes to DNA sequences. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1978;42(Pt 1):103–108. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1978.042.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Spadafora C., Bellard M., Compton J. L., Chambon P. The DNA repeat lengths in chromatins from sea urchin sperm and gastrule cells are markedly different. FEBS Lett. 1976 Oct 15;69(1):281–285. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(76)80704-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sperling L., Tardieu A., Weiss M. C. Chromatin repeat length in somatic hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 May;77(5):2716–2720. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.5.2716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Szpirer C., Szpirer J. A mouse hepatoma cell line which secretes several serum proteins including albumin and alpha-foetoprotein. Differentiation. 1975 Oct 16;4(2):85–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1975.tb01446.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Thomas J. O., Thompson R. J. Variation in chromatin structure in two cell types from the same tissue: a short DNA repeat length in cerebral cortex neurons. Cell. 1977 Apr;10(4):633–640. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES