Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2012 Oct 17;279(1749):5014–5023. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2011

Female-specific target sites for both oestrogen and androgen in the teleost brain

Towako Hiraki 1, Akio Takeuchi 1, Takayasu Tsumaki 1, Buntaro Zempo 2, Shinji Kanda 2, Yoshitaka Oka 2, Yoshitaka Nagahama 3,4, Kataaki Okubo 1,*
PMCID: PMC3497244  PMID: 23075834

Abstract

To dissect the molecular and cellular basis of sexual differentiation of the teleost brain, which maintains marked sexual plasticity throughout life, we examined sex differences in neural expression of all subtypes of nuclear oestrogen and androgen receptors (ER and AR) in medaka. All receptors were differentially expressed between the sexes in specific nuclei in the forebrain. The most pronounced sex differences were found in several nuclei in the ventral telencephalic and preoptic areas, where ER and AR expression were prominent in females but almost completely absent in males, indicating that these nuclei represent female-specific target sites for both oestrogen and androgen in the brain. Subsequent analyses revealed that the female-specific expression of ER and AR is not under the direct control of sex-linked genes but is instead regulated positively by oestrogen and negatively by androgen in a transient and reversible manner. Taken together, the present study demonstrates that sex-specific target sites for both oestrogen and androgen occur in the brain as a result of the activational effects of gonadal steroids. The consequent sex-specific but reversible steroid sensitivity of the adult brain probably contributes substantially to the process of sexual differentiation and the persistent sexual plasticity of the teleost brain.

Keywords: teleost, brain, sex differences, sexual plasticity, oestrogen receptor, androgen receptor

1. Introduction

Oestrogen and androgen play critical roles in sexual differentiation of the vertebrate brain [1]. These sex steroid hormones regulate a wide range of physiological and behavioural traits (including neuroendocrine hormone secretion, reproductive behaviour and aggression) in a sex-dependent manner. Most of these effects depend on activation of nuclear oestrogen and androgen receptors (ER and AR) expressed in the brain. Because there are pronounced sex differences in the effectiveness of oestrogen and androgen on some of these traits, ER and AR are presumably expressed in a sex-dependent manner in the brain. Indeed, sex differences in their expression that could underlie the differences in traits have been identified in several brain nuclei of many vertebrate species [24].

In teleost fishes, however, there have been no studies demonstrating sex differences in the expression of ER and AR in brain nuclei. The teleost brain is unique in that it exhibits a considerable degree of sexual plasticity throughout the lifetime of the fish [5]. Although the mammalian brain is also initially plastic, and equally capable of assuming a male or female phenotype, it undergoes an irreversible process of sexual differentiation during perinatal development. Conversely, the phenotypic sex of teleosts, including sex-specific reproductive behaviour, can be manipulated by exposure to exogenous oestrogen or androgen, even after sexual maturity [6]. Furthermore, a large number of teleost species spontaneously undergo phenotypic sex inversion, even in adulthood [5]. These phenomena indicate that teleosts must have distinctive mechanisms of sexual differentiation of the brain that remain largely unknown. For these reasons, the teleost is a good model for providing insights into the mechanisms underlying the sexual plasticity of the brain and the evolutionary processes in the sexual differentiation of the vertebrate brain.

Medaka (Oryzias latipes) offer a number of advantages as a teleost model for sex differences and sexual differentiation. For example, medaka represent one of a few teleost species in which the sex-determining gene has been identified [7,8]. Furthermore, its phenotypic sex can easily be manipulated by hormonal treatment [9]. Teleosts, including medaka, have three paralogous genes for ER—esr1 (or ERα), esr2a (or ERβ1) and esr2b (or ERβ2)—and two genes for AR—ara (or ARα) and arb (or ARβ), which arose from the whole genome duplication early in teleost evolution [10,11]. Here, we assessed the expression of these genes in the medaka brain and found that several brain nuclei express both ER and AR almost exclusively only in females, representing female-specific target sites for both oestrogen and androgen. Subsequent analyses revealed that the female-specific expression of ER and AR in these brain nuclei arises from the activational effects of gonadal steroids, and is therefore sexually plastic even in adulthood, thereby perhaps contributing to the remarkable sexual plasticity of the teleost brain.

2. Material and methods

(a). Animals

The use and care of animals in this study were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Life Sciences of the University of Tokyo. Medaka of the d-rR strain were bred and maintained at 28°C with a 14 L : 10 D photoperiod, and were fed three to four times a day with live brine shrimp and commercial pellet food. Sexually mature spawning adult fish of 3 to 5 months post-fertilization (mpf) were sampled at 1–2.5 h following the onset of light and used for analyses, unless otherwise noted.

(b). Examination of sex differences in the overall expression of ER and AR in the brain

Sex differences in the overall expression of ER and AR in the medaka brain were examined throughout the diurnal/reproductive cycles by real-time PCR (medaka undergo daily cycles of gametogenesis and spawning; they typically spawn around the time the lights come on at 9.00). The whole brain was removed from sexually mature medaka of both sexes at 4 h intervals across a 24 h period (6.00, 10.00, 14.00, 18.00, 22.00 and 2.00; n = 7 for each sex at each sampling time point). Total RNA was isolated from the brain using RNeasy lipid tissue mini kit (Qiagen, Hilgen, Germany) with DNase treatment (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized using Omniscript RT kit (Qiagen) supplemented with random nonamers (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). Real-time PCR was performed using LightCycler 480 System II with LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The levels of β-actin (actb) expression in each sample were used to normalize the expression of ER and AR transcript. Primers used are listed in electronic supplementary material, table S1.

Sex differences in the overall expression of ER and AR in the medaka brain during sexual maturation were also examined. The whole brain was dissected from male and female medaka (n = 8 for each sex) at 1 mpf, at which stage secondary sexual characteristics (sex differences in the shape of the dorsal and anal fins) had begun to appear, at 2 mpf, at which stage fish were juvenile and had not yet spawned, at 3 mpf, at which stage fish had reached sexual maturity and spawned, and at 7 mpf, at which stage fish had regressed somewhat and the frequency of spawning had declined. Real-time PCR was carried out as described earlier.

(c). Identification of brain nuclei responsible for sex differences in ER and AR expression

The DNA fragments corresponding to nucleotides 1672–2759, 1838–3039, 1828–3037, 53–1233 and 16–1030 of the medaka esr1 (D28954), esr2a (AB070901, together with the genome database), esr2b (AB428449, together with the genome database), ara (AB076399) and arb (EU100398) cDNAs, respectively, were PCR-amplified and used to generate digoxigenin (DIG)-labelled cRNA probes, with the DIG RNA labelling mix (Roche Diagnostics). Whole brains dissected from sexually mature medaka of both sexes (n = 4) were fixed in 4 per cent paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 6–7 h, dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in paraffin. The sections were digested with proteinase K (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) for 15 min at 37°C, postfixed with 4 per cent PFA for 10 min, and acetylated with 0.25 per cent acetic anhydride in 0.1 M triethanolamine for 15 min. Hybridization was conducted overnight at 55°C with the earlier-described DIG-labelled probes in hybridization buffer: 50 per cent formamide, 5x saline-sodium citrate (SSC) 5x Denhardt's solution, 2 mg ml−1 yeast RNA and 30 μg ml−1 calf thymus DNA. The sections were washed in 5x SSC, 50 per cent formamide for 20 min at 55°C and in 2x SSC for 2 × 20 min at 55°C. The hybridized probes were visualized using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG Fab fragment (Roche Diagnostics) in a dilution of 1 : 2000–5000 and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium substrate (Roche Diagnostics), following the manufacturer's instructions. The colour was allowed to develop overnight in the dark. For semi-quantitative analysis, all sections throughout the brain were photographed and converted to black and white binary images by thresholding using Photoshop (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA). The total area of ER and AR expression was calculated for each nucleus using ImageJ (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). The subdivisions and nomenclature of brain nuclei were taken from the medaka brain atlases [12,13] (http://www.shigen.nig.ac.jp/medaka/medaka_atlas/) and extensively supplemented with information obtained from our Nissl-stained sections.

(d). Examination of genetic and phenotypic sex dependence of ER and AR expression

Sex-inverted medaka were produced as described previously [14]. Briefly, fertilized eggs were incubated at high temperature (32°C) and simultaneously received 0.2 ng ml−1 methyltestosterone until hatching, which led to the production of XX males. XY female fish were obtained by exposing fertilized eggs to 200 ng ml−1 17β-oestradiol (E2) until hatching. Whole brains were removed from XX males and XY females, as well as wild-type XY males and XX females, all of which were sexually mature (n = 8 for each group). Real-time PCR was carried out to assess ER and AR expression as described earlier.

(e). Evaluation of the effects of gonadal sex steroids on ER and AR expression

The ovary was surgically removed from sexually mature females following the procedure from an early study [15]. Ovariectomized fish were treated with 100 ng ml−1 of E2 or 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT; a prominent, non-aromatizable teleost androgen) or vehicle alone (ethanol) by immersion for 5 days (n = 12 for each group). Sham-operated female fish (n = 12) were treated with vehicle alone as controls. The whole brains of these fish were dissected out and used for real-time PCR to assess the effects of gonadal sex steroids on the overall expression of ER and AR in the brain as described earlier. Semi-quantitative in situ hybridization was also carried out using the whole brain (n = 8 for each group) as described earlier, to appreciate the steroidal effects on ER and AR expression in respective brain nuclei where they were differentially expressed between the sexes.

(f). Statistical analysis

In all real-time PCR analyses, the expression levels of ER and AR (normalized by that of actb) in sexually mature male brain were arbitrarily set to one, and the relative difference was calculated, in order to facilitate comparisons among analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Comparisons between two groups of data were evaluated for statistical significance by the unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test. When the F-test indicated that the variances differed significantly between groups, Welch's correction to the Student's t-test was used. Comparisons between more than two groups were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance followed by either Tukey's (for pairwise comparisons between all groups) or Bonferroni's (for comparisons between preselected pairs) post hoc test. When Bartlett's and Brown–Forsythe tests indicated that the variances were significantly different among groups, data were log-transformed to normalize distributions prior to this analysis. If the variances still remained heterogeneous after transformation, data were analysed by the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn's post hoc test.

3. Results

(a). Sex differences in the overall expression of ER and AR in the brain

We first examined the occurrence of sex differences in the overall ER and AR expression in the adult medaka brain. The expression of ER and AR could vary depending on the diurnal and/or reproductive cycle, and, accordingly, was assessed throughout the day (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S1). Higher levels of esr1 expression were observed in the male brain at all time points examined except at 10.00. While no significant sex differences in esr2a expression were detected at any time point examined, esr2b was consistently expressed at higher levels in the female brain, except at 22.00. A significant female bias was also apparent in ara expression at 10.00, and in arb expression at 10.00, 14.00 and 2.00.

Subsequently, developmental changes in the overall expression of ER and AR in the medaka brain were investigated to determine when, during sexual maturation, the expression was sexually differentiated (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S2). While no sex differences were detected for esr1 expression throughout maturation, esr2a begun to exhibit significantly higher expression in the male brain than the female brain during the late spawning period (7 mpf). By contrast, esr2b exhibited greater levels of expression in the female brain than in the male brain as early as at the onset of secondary sexual characteristics (1 mpf), and the difference between sexes increased with sexual maturation. The gene ara exhibited significantly higher expression in females only during the early spawning period (3 mpf), while significant female-biased expression of arb first appeared at the onset of puberty (2 mpf), and persisted during the spawning period.

(b). Identification of brain nuclei responsible for sex differences in ER and AR expression

We then determined the brain nuclei that were the sources of ER (figure 1) and AR (figure 2) expression and their sex differences in sexually mature medaka. Abbreviations for medaka brain nuclei are given in table 1. Some genes were continuously expressed over two or more nuclei in certain brain regions, where it was difficult to analyse expression separately in each nucleus. In this case, the total area of expression was summed over the nuclei, and the names of the nuclei are separated by slashes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Sex differences in the expression of ER (esr1, esr2a and esr2b) in the brain of sexually mature medaka. The total area of esr1, esr2a and esr2b expression in each nucleus of the male and female brain (n = 4 for each sex) is shown. In the case of expression extending over two or more nuclei, the names of the nuclei are separated by slashes. The filled columns represent males, and the open columns females. Error bars represent s.e.m. Significant sex differences are indicated with asterisks (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). Representative photographs of the sexually dimorphic expression of esr1, esr2a and esr2b in respective brain nuclei are shown. Scale bars, 50 μm. For the abbreviations of the brain nucleus, see table 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Sex differences in the expression of AR (ara and arb) in the brain of sexually mature medaka. The total area of ara and arb expression in each nucleus of the male and female brain (n = 4 for each sex) is shown. In the case of expression extending over two or more nuclei, the names of the nuclei are separated by slashes. The filled columns represent males, and the open columns females. Error bars represent s.e.m. Significant sex differences are indicated with asterisks (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). Representative photographs of the sexually dimorphic expression of ara and arb in respective brain nuclei are shown. Scale bars, 50 μm. For the abbreviations of the brain nucleus, see table 1.

Table 1.

Abbreviations of the brain nucleus.

aPPp anterior part of posterior parvocellular preoptic nucleus
IQ inferior oblique of the nucleus of oculomotor nerve
NAT nucleus anterior tuberis
NPT nucleus posterior tuberis
NRP posterior recess nucleus
NVT nucleus ventral tuberis
PGZ3 periventricular grey zone (layer 3)
PMg gigantocellular portion of the magnocellular preoptic nucleus
PMm magnocellular portion of the magnocellular preoptic nucleus
PMp parvocellular portion of the magnocellular preoptic nucleus
PPa anterior parvocellular preoptic nucleus
pPPp posterior part of posterior parvocellular preoptic nucleus
RT rostral tegmental nucleus
Vd dorsal nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area
VM ventromedial nucleus (thalamus)
Vp posterior nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area
Vs supracommissural nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area
Vv ventral nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area

The gene esr1 was expressed in the posterior nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area (Vp) in the telencephalon; the parvocellular portion of the magnocellular preoptic nucleus (PMp) and the anterior part of the posterior parvocellular preoptic nucleus (aPPp) in the preoptic area; and the nuclei ventral tuberis (NVT) and posterior tuberis (NPT) in the hypothalamus (figure 1). Its expression in aPPp was almost specific to females; none to a few esr1-expressing neurons were detected in males. On the other hand, esr2a was expressed in the ventral nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area (Vv) and the dorsal/supracommissural/posterior nuclei of the ventral telencephalic area (Vd/Vs/Vp) in the telencephalon; PMp and the anterior parvocellular preoptic nucleus (PPa) in the preoptic area; the posterior part of the posterior parvocellular preoptic nucleus (pPPp) in the thalamus; and NVT/the posterior recess nucleus (NRP) in the hypothalamus (figure 1). All nuclei in the preoptic area, thalamus and hypothalamus had a significantly higher expression of esr2a in males than in females. The gene esr2b was expressed in Vs/Vp in the telencephalon; PMp, PPa and the magnocellular/gigantocellular portions of the magnocellular preoptic nucleus (PMm/PMg)/aPPp in the preoptic area; pPPp and the ventromedial nucleus (VM) in the thalamus; the nucleus anterior tuberis (NAT), NVT and NPT in the hypothalamus; and the inferior oblique of the nucleus of oculomotor nerve (IQ)/rostral tegmental nucleus (RT) in the tegmentum (figure 1). esr2b expression in Vs/Vp, PMm/PMg/aPPp and pPPp was almost entirely female-specific; males had none to a few esr2b-expressing neurons in these nuclei.

Neurons expressing ara were observed in Vv and Vs/Vp in the telencephalon; PMp, PPa and aPPp in the preoptic area; pPPp in the thalamus; NVT and NPT in the hypothalamus; and the periventricular grey zone (layer 3; PGZ3) in the optic tectum (figure 2). Males had a significantly greater expression of ara in NPT. The gene arb was expressed in Vs/Vp in the telencephalon; PMp, PPa and PMm/PMg/aPPp in the preoptic area; pPPp and VM in the thalamus; NAT, NVT and NPT in the hypothalamus; and PGZ3 in the optic tectum (figure 2). All nuclei in the telencephalon, preoptic area and hypothalamus, except NVT, contained more arb expression in females than males. The most striking sex differences were found in Vs/Vp, PMm/PMg/aPPp and NPT, where arb expression was restricted almost exclusively to females.

The distribution of sexually dimorphic expression of ER and AR in the medaka brain is illustrated in figure 3. Vs/Vp and PMm/PMg/aPPp exhibited the most conspicuous sex difference, where both ER and AR were prominently expressed in females but were almost completely absent in males.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Schematic of the distribution of sex differences in the expression of ER (esr1, esr2a and esr2b) and AR (ara and arb) in the brain of sexually mature medaka. (a) Lateral view of the medaka brain with the side anterior to the left. Levels of sections shown (b)–(i) are indicated. Ce, cerebellum; Hyp, hypothalamus; MO, medulla oblongata; OB, olfactory bulb; OpN, optic nerve; OT, optic tectum; Tel, telencephalon. (b)–(i) Line drawings showing the distribution of sex differences in esr1 (circles), esr2a (triangles), esr2b (squares), ara (inverted triangles) and arb (stars) expression are on the right and corresponding Nissl-stained sections are on the left. Scale bars, 200 μm. Sex differences with male nuclei having more abundant expression are shown by filled symbols, and those with female nuclei having more expression are shown by grey symbols. For the abbreviations of brain nuclei, see table 1.

(c). Genetic and phenotypic sex dependence of ER and AR expression

Next, in order to understand the magnitude of genetic and hormonal influences on the mechanisms underlying sexual differentiation in the neural expression of ER and AR, we produced sex-inverted fish to investigate if sex-dependent expression patterns coincided with genetic sex or phenotypic sex (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S3). XY females exhibited the same high level of neural expression of esr2b, ara and arb as wild-type XX females, whereas XX males expressed these genes at a lower level, comparable to wild-type XY males. There were no significant differences in esr1 and esr2a expression between XX males and XY females.

(d). Effects of gonadal sex steroids on ER and AR expression

We subsequently examined the effects of gonadal steroids on the overall ER and AR expression in the brain by using females subjected to sham operation, ovariectomy or ovariectomy plus E2 or 11-KT treatment (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S4). There were no statistically significant differences between sham-operated and ovariectomized fish in the overall expression of any of the genes. E2 treatment, however, led to a significant increase in the expression of all genes except esr2a compared with the ovariectomized fish. By contrast, 11-KT significantly decreased the expression of esr2b and arb.

We then evaluated the effects of gonadal steroids on the expression of ER and AR in the respective brain nuclei where they were differentially expressed between the sexes, by means of an ovariectomy, followed by steroid treatment as described earlier. The results of the female-biased expression of ER and AR are shown in figures 4 and 5, respectively. The results of the male-biased ER and AR expression are shown in electronic supplementary material, figures S5 and S6, respectively. Ovariectomy caused a substantial decrease in esr1 expression in aPPp and esr2b expression in Vs/Vp and PMm/PMg/aPPp, which was significantly reversed by E2. Conversely, the decrease was further enhanced by 11-KT in esr2b expression in Vs/Vp, PMm/PMg/aPPp and pPPp, resulting in little or no expression (figure 4). On the other hand, esr2a expression in PMp, PPa, pPPp and NVT/NRP did not show clear responses to ovariectomy or E2 or 11-KT administration, except for a significant increase in PMp by ovariectomy (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S5). The expression of arb in Vs/Vp, PMp, PPa, NAT and NPT was greatly reduced by ovariectomy and restored by exposure to E2 (figure 5). In addition, 11-KT induced a significant reduction of arb expression in Vs/Vp. The expression of ara in NPT also significantly increased with E2 treatment (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S6).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Effects of sex steroids on the expression of ER (esr1 and esr2b) in respective nuclei of the mature medaka brain where they are expressed at higher levels in females than males. The total area of esr1 expression in aPPp and esr2b expression in Vs/Vp, PMm/PMg/aPPp and pPPp of sham-operated females (Sham) and ovariectomized females exposed to vehicle alone (OVX), E2 (OVX + E2) or 11-KT (OVX + KT) (n = 8 for each group) is shown. Error bars represent s.e.m. Superscripts with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Representative photographs of esr1 and esr2b expression in respective brain nuclei of the Sham, OVX, OVX + E2 and OVX + KT fish are shown. Scale bars, 50 μm. For the abbreviations of brain nuclei, see table 1.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Effects of sex steroids on the expression of AR (arb) in respective nuclei of the mature medaka brain where it is expressed at higher levels in females than males. The total area of arb expression in Vs/Vp, PMp, PPa, PMm/PMg/aPPp, NAT and NPT of sham-operated females (Sham) and ovariectomized females exposed to vehicle alone (OVX), E2 (OVX + E2) or 11-KT (OVX + KT) (n = 8 for each group) is shown in graphs. Error bars represent s.e.m. Superscripts with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Representative photographs of arb expression in respective brain nuclei of the Sham, OVX, OVX + E2 and OVX + KT fish are shown. Scale bars, 50 μm. For the abbreviations of brain nuclei, see table 1.

4. Discussion

While several studies have addressed ER and AR expression in the brain of teleosts [1620], virtually nothing is known about its sex differences, with only one study investigating AR expression levels in the whole brain of wrasse [21]. In the present study, we demonstrated that ER and AR are, to a large extent, differentially expressed between the sexes in the medaka brain. In teleosts, circulating testosterone levels in females are substantial and are sometimes equal to the levels found in males; females undergo a large preovulatory surge of circulating testosterone [22]. Meanwhile, brain aromatase activity in teleosts is 100–1000 times greater than in mammals and birds, resulting in a high amount of oestrogen even in the male brain [23]. Considering these facts, sex differences in the sex steroid milieu in the teleost brain are likely to be smaller compared with other vertebrates. Our present observation of the marked sexual dimorphism in neural ER and AR expression suggests that sex differences in the central action of oestrogen and androgen are primarily controlled at the receptor level rather than at the ligand level. Sex differences in the sensitivity of the brain to oestrogen and androgen are thus the most likely underlying mechanism for brain sexual differentiation in teleosts, at least in medaka.

Intriguingly, the patterns of sex differences in central ER and AR expression in medaka are very different from those observed in other vertebrates, suggesting that roles for ER and AR in brain sexual differentiation in teleosts are distinct from those in other vertebrates. For instance, as opposed to the situation in the mammalian and avian brain, in which Esr1 is expressed more intensely in females in several nuclei [2,24,25], the female-biased expression of esr1 occurs only in a nucleus aPPp, and males show greater overall esr1 expression in the medaka brain. This observation implies a unique role for the teleost esr1 in neural masculinization or defeminization. In addition, ara and arb are expressed at approximately equal levels between the sexes and at higher levels in females, respectively, in the medaka brain; this is in contrast to the situation in mammals, where Ar is generally expressed to a greater extent in the male brain than in the female brain, thus playing a critical role in the masculinization of reproductive behaviour [2629]. These results suggest that androgen/AR signalling has some relevance to feminization or demasculinization of the female brain in teleosts.

It should be noted that there are pronounced sex differences in ER and/or AR expression in several nuclei of the medaka brain, where their expression is prominent in one sex but nearly or fully absent in the other sex. Most surprisingly, PMm/PMg/aPPp in the preoptic area abundantly express esr1, esr2b and arb in females, but there is little to no expression of any of the receptors in males. A similar situation occurs in Vs/Vp in the telencephalon, where, although both males and females more or less express all the receptor genes, the expression of the most dominant receptors in these nuclei (esr2b and arb) is almost completely specific to females. This finding indicates that these nuclei represent female-specific target sites for both oestrogen and androgen in the medaka brain. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the existence of sex-specific target nuclei for both oestrogen and androgen in the brain.

PMm/PMg consist of small populations of large neurosecretory neurons, including isotocin- and vasotocin-producing neurons [30]. aPPp lies immediately ventral to PMm/PMg and contains a relatively large population of small neurosecretory neurons. Although still controversial, aPPp is assumed to be homologous to the paraventricular nucleus or medial preoptic area in mammals [31,32]. Vs/Vp are considered to be homologous to the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST) in mammals [33,34]. The principal nucleus of the BNST in mammals is larger and contains more neurons in males than females, and plays an important role in male reproductive behaviour [3537]. Consistent with these lines of evidence, males harbour more intense expression of Esr2 and Ar than females in this nucleus in mammals [27]. Our present results revealed that, as opposed to the mammalian BNST, Vs/Vp as well as PMm/PMg/aPPp in medaka express ER and AR almost specifically in females. Therefore, these brain nuclei are likely to be receptive to oestrogen and androgen only in females, and relevant to female-specific brain function induced by oestrogen and androgen. It is of interest to note that each of PMm/PMg/aPPp and Vs/Vp in teleosts has been implicated, by classic lesion and electrical stimulation studies, in reproductive behaviour [3841]. It is thus reasonable to assume that the female-specific expression of ER and AR in these brain nuclei in teleosts is responsible for promoting female-typical or suppressing male-typical reproductive behaviour in females. Consistent with this idea, we found here that in the medaka brain, esr2b, ara and arb have the largest female bias in overall expression around the onset of the light phase, when medaka usually spawn, further suggesting their involvement in reproductive behaviour.

The question then arises as to the mechanisms that underlie the sexually dimorphic expression of ER and AR in the medaka brain. Accumulating evidence suggests that some parts of the mammalian and avian brains sexually differentiate according to a cell-autonomous genetic programme determined by genes on the sex chromosome, referred to as ‘sex chromosome’ effects [4244]. In the present study, we evaluated the possible involvement of sex chromosome genes in sex-dependent ER and AR expression in the medaka brain by generating and analysing sex-inverted fish. The overall expression levels of ER and AR in the medaka brain were correlated not with genetic sex but rather with phenotypic sex, indicating that their sex differences do not arise from the sex chromosome effects. Instead, the result implies that hormonal factors are the root cause of sex differences in the expression of ER and AR in the medaka brain.

Accordingly, we then assessed the effects of gonadal steroids on the sexually dimorphic expression of ER and AR, and demonstrated that their expression is indeed significantly influenced by gonadal steroids. Notably, in the brain nuclei where females exhibit higher expression of ER (esr1 and esr2b), these genes are regulated positively by gonadal E2 and negatively by 11-KT, the primary androgen in teleosts, thus being consistent with the female-specific expression in these nuclei. In marked contrast to the current observation, the suppressive effects of oestrogen on Esr1 and Esr2 expression have been repeatedly described in the mammalian brain [45], suggesting different oestrogenic regulatory systems for central ER expression in teleosts and mammals. The inhibitory effect of androgen on the medaka ER is probably mediated by AR, as 11-KT is a non-aromatizable androgen. Hence, the female-specific ER expression in the medaka brain arises through the combination of oestrogen upregulation via ER itself and androgen downregulation via AR. The other ER form in medaka, esr2a, shows no clear responses to any hormonal alterations, although it exhibits robust male-biased expression in several brain nuclei. The regulatory mechanisms for esr2a consequently remain unknown. Our data reveal that the expression of both ara and arb is also regulated positively by gonadal E2. In addition, the overall expression of arb in the brain is influenced negatively by 11-KT, although this effect is significant only in Vs/Vp at the level of the nucleus and thus appears somewhat modest. The cross-talk between oestrogen/ER and androgen/AR signalling probably underlies AR expression in the medaka brain as well. Importantly, these regulatory mechanisms for ER and AR expression involving the self-feedback cycling of ligand–receptor events, as well as the cross-talk of the signalling pathways, have a potential to synergistically enhance or, conversely, abolish the central action of oestrogen and androgen following even slight changes in the steroid milieu. This should be an efficient system for causing sexual differentiation of the teleost brain, where the steroid milieu often appears to differ relatively little between the sexes.

Another important aspect of the present findings is the reversibility of sex-dependent expression patterns of ER and AR in the brain. The robust expression of ER and AR in females is diminished to the same low level as in males by ovariectomy and androgen treatment, indicating that the female-typical expression patterns could be converted almost completely to those seen in males, under two conditions: without a constant supply of oestrogen from the ovary or with an increase in the circulating androgen. The sexually dimorphic expression of ER and AR in the medaka brain thus depends largely (or even perhaps solely) on the transient and reversible effects of adult gonadal steroids, which should be regarded as ‘activational’ effects, unlike in the mammalian brain, where Esr1 and Esr2 expression is epigenetically programmed in a permanent and irreversible manner by the ‘organizational’ effects of sex steroids during the perinatal period [46,47]. This view is further supported by the observation that sex differences of ER and AR expression in the medaka brain appear concomitantly with the onset of sexual maturation. The consequence of full reversibility of the sex-specific neural ER and AR expression patterns is that sexually differentiated sensitivity of respective brain nuclei to sex steroids, which defines the site and degree of steroid action differentially in the male and female brain, can be inverted between the sexes. The considerable and enduring sexual plasticity of the teleost brain is presumably attributable to this reversible sexual dimorphism in neural sensitivity to sex steroids. Similar activational effects of sex steroids and sexual reversibility have been observed for the expression of aromatase in the brain of several teleost species [14,4850]. This steroidogenic enzyme, as well as sex steroid receptors, may contribute substantially to determine the sexual phenotype of the teleost brain by modulating the balance between oestrogen and androgen signalling in the brain.

In conclusion, we found that the expression of both ER and AR in several telencephalic and preoptic nuclei of the medaka brain is prominent in females but almost completely absent in males, indicating that these nuclei represent female-specific target sites for both oestrogen and androgen. Most of the sexually dimorphic expression of ER and AR in the medaka brain, including that in the female-specific steroid target nuclei, arises largely, if not entirely, from the activational effects of oestrogen and androgen, and is therefore sexually plastic, even in adulthood. The resultant sex-specific, but reversible, sensitivity to oestrogen and androgen in the adult brain probably contributes significantly to the process of sexual differentiation and a remarkable degree of sexual plasticity in the teleost brain.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by SORST of Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), grant-in-aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas of The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan (MEXT) and grant-in-aid for Young Scientists of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

References

  • 1.McCarthy M. M., Arnold A. P. 2011. Reframing sexual differentiation of the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 677–683 10.1038/nn.2834 (doi:10.1038/nn.2834) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Scott C. J., Tilbrook A. J., Simmons D. M., Rawson J. A., Chu S., Fuller P. J., Ing N. H., Clarke I. J. 2000. The distribution of cells containing estrogen receptor-α (ERα) and ERβ messenger ribonucleic acid in the preoptic area and hypothalamus of the sheep: comparison of males and females. Endocrinology 141, 2951–2962 10.1210/en.141.8.2951 (doi:10.1210/en.141.8.2951) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shah N. M., Pisapia D. J., Maniatis S., Mendelsohn M. M., Nemes A., Axel R. 2004. Visualizing sexual dimorphism in the brain. Neuron 43, 313–319 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.07.008 (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.07.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Voigt C., Ball G. F., Balthazart J. 2009. Sex differences in the expression of sex steroid receptor mRNA in the quail brain. J. Neuroendocrinol. 21, 1045–1062 (doi:10.1111/j.1365–2826.2009.01929.x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Godwin J. 2010. Neuroendocrinology of sexual plasticity in teleost fishes. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 31, 203–216 10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.02.002 (doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.02.002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Munakata A., Kobayashi M. 2010. Endocrine control of sexual behavior in teleost fish. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 165, 456–468 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.04.011 (doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.04.011) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Matsuda M., et al. 2002. DMY is a Y-specific DM-domain gene required for male development in the medaka fish. Nature 417, 559–563 10.1038/nature751 (doi:10.1038/nature751) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nanda I., et al. 2002. A duplicated copy of DMRT1 in the sex-determining region of the Y chromosome of the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11 778–11 783 10.1073/pnas.182314699 (doi:10.1073/pnas.182314699) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yamamoto T. 1958. Artificial induction of functional sex-reversal in genotypic females of the medaka (Oryzias latipes). J. Exp. Zool. 137, 227–264 10.1002/jez.1401370203 (doi:10.1002/jez.1401370203) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ikeuchi T., Todo T., Kobayashi T., Nagahama Y. 1999. cDNA cloning of a novel androgen receptor subtype. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 25 205–25 209 10.1074/jbc.274.36.25205 (doi:10.1074/jbc.274.36.25205) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hawkins M. B., Thornton J. W., Crews D., Skipper J. K., Dotte A., Thomas P. 2000. Identification of a third distinct estrogen receptor and reclassification of estrogen receptors in teleosts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10 751–10 756 10.1073/pnas.97.20.10751 (doi:10.1073/pnas.97.20.10751) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Anken R., Bourrat F. 1998. Brain atlas of the medakafish. Paris, France: INRA Editions [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ishikawa Y., Yoshimoto M., Ito H. 1999. A brain atlas of a wild-type inbred strain of the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Fish Biol. J. Medaka 10, 1–26 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Okubo K., Takeuchi A., Chaube R., Paul-Prasanth B., Kanda S., Oka Y., Nagahama Y. 2011. Sex differences in aromatase gene expression in the medaka brain. J. Neuroendocrinol. 23, 412–423 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02120.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02120.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kanda S., Akazome Y., Matsunaga T., Yamamoto N., Yamada S., Tsukamura H., Maeda K., Oka Y. 2008. Identification of KiSS-1 product kisspeptin and steroid-sensitive sexually dimorphic kisspeptin neurons in medaka (Oryzias latipes). Endocrinology 149, 2467–2476 10.1210/en.2007-1503 (doi:10.1210/en.2007-1503) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Menuet A., Pellegrini E., Anglade I., Blaise O., Laudet V., Kah O., Pakdel F. 2002. Molecular characterization of three estrogen receptor forms in zebrafish: binding characteristics, transactivation properties, and tissue distributions. Biol. Reprod. 66, 1881–1892 10.1095/biolreprod66.6.1881 (doi:10.1095/biolreprod66.6.1881) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Forlano P. M., Deitcher D. L., Bass A. H. 2005. Distribution of estrogen receptor alpha mRNA in the brain and inner ear of a vocal fish with comparisons to sites of aromatase expression. J. Comp. Neurol. 483, 91–113 10.1002/cne.20397 (doi:10.1002/cne.20397) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Forlano P. M., Marchaterre M., Deitcher D. L., Bass A. H. 2010. Distribution of androgen receptor mRNA expression in vocal, auditory and neuroendocrine circuits in a teleost fish. J. Comp. Neurol. 518, 493–512 10.1002/cne.22233 (doi:10.1002/cne.22233) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Harbott L. K., Burmeister S. S., White R. B., Vagell M., Fernald R. D. 2007. Androgen receptors in a cichlid fish, Astatotilapia burtoni: structure, localization, and expression levels. J. Comp. Neurol. 504, 57–73 10.1002/cne.21435 (doi:10.1002/cne.21435) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Munchrath L. A., Hoffmann H. A. 2010. Distribution of sex steroid hormone receptors in the brain of an African cichlid fish, Astatotilapia burtoni. J. Comp. Neurol. 518, 3302–3326 10.1002/cne.22401 (doi:10.1002/cne.22401) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim S. J., Ogasawara K., Park J. G., Takemura A., Nakamura M. 2002. Sequence and expression of androgen receptor and estrogen receptor gene in the sex types of protogynous wrasse, Halichoeres trimaculatus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 127, 165–173 10.1016/S0016-6480(02)00020-5 (doi:10.1016/S0016-6480(02)00020-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Katz Y., Eckstein B. 1974. Changes in steroid concentration in blood of female Tilapia aurea (Teleostei, Cichlidae) during initiation of spawning. Endocrinology 95, 963–967 10.1210/endo-95-4-963 (doi:10.1210/endo-95-4-963) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pasmanik M., Callard G. V. 1985. Aromatase and 5α-reductase in the teleost brain, spinal cord, and pituitary gland. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 60, 244–251 10.1016/0016-6480(85)90320-X (doi:10.1016/0016-6480(85)90320-X) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shughrue P. J., Bushnell C. D., Dorsa D. M. 1992. Estrogen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in female rat brain during the estrous cycle: a comparison with ovariectomized females and intact males. Endocrinology 131, 381–388 10.1210/en.131.1.381 (doi:10.1210/en.131.1.381) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhou Y., Shughrue P. J., Dorsa D. M. 1995. Estrogen receptor protein is differentially regulated in the preoptic area of the brain and in the uterus during the rat estrous cycle. Neuroendocrinology 61, 276–283 10.1159/000126849 (doi:10.1159/000126849) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McGinnis M. Y., Katz S. E. 1996. Sex differences in cytosolic androgen receptors in gonadectomized male and female rats. J. Neuroendocrinol. 8, 193–197 10.1046/j.1365-2826.1996.04494.x (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2826.1996.04494.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lu S. F., McKenna S. E., Cologer-Clifford A., Nau E. A., Simon N. G. 1998. Androgen receptor in mouse brain: sex differences and similarities in autoregulation. Endocrinology 139, 1594–1601 10.1210/en.139.4.1594 (doi:10.1210/en.139.4.1594) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fernández-Guasti A., Kruijver F. P., Fodor M., Swaab D. F. 2000. Sex differences in the distribution of androgen receptors in the human hypothalamus. J. Comp. Neurol. 425, 422–435 (doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20000925)425:3<422::AID-CNE7>3.0.CO;2-H) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Scott C. J., Clarke I. J., Rao A., Tilbrook A. J. 2004. Sex differences in the distribution and abundance of androgen receptor mRNA-containing cells in the preoptic area and hypothalamus of the ram and ewe. J. Neuroendocrinol. 16, 956–963 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2005.01261.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2005.01261.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Reaves T. A., Jr, Hayward J. N. 1979. Functional and morphological studies of peptide-containing neuroendocrine cells in goldfish hypothalamus. J. Comp. Neurol. 193, 777–788 10.1002/cne.901930313 (doi:10.1002/cne.901930313) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Johnston S. A., Maler L. 1992. Anatomical organization of the hypophysiotrophic systems in the electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J. Comp. Neurol. 317, 421–437 10.1002/cne.903170408 (doi:10.1002/cne.903170408) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zupanc G. K., Horschke I. 1997. Neurons of the posterior subdivision of the nucleus preopticus periventricularis project to the preglomerular nucleus in the weakly electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. Brain Res. 774, 106–115 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)81693-9 (doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(97)81693-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Northcutt R. G. 1995. The forebrain of gnathostomes: in search of a morphotype. Brain Behav. Evol. 46, 275–318 10.1159/000113279 (doi:10.1159/000113279) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.O'Connell L. A., Hofmann H. A. 2011. The vertebrate mesolimbic reward system and social behavior network: a comparative synthesis. J. Comp. Neurol. 519, 3599–3639 10.1002/cne.22735 (doi:10.1002/cne.22735) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hines M., Allen L. S., Gorski R. A. 1992. Sex differences in subregions of the medial nucleus of the amygdala and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis of the rat. Brain Res. 579, 321–326 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90068-K (doi:10.1016/0006-8993(92)90068-K) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Claro F., Segovia S., Guilamón A., Del Abril A. 1995. Lesions in the medial posterior region of the BST impair sexual behavior in sexually experienced and inexperienced male rats. Brain Res. Bull. 36, 1–10 10.1016/0361-9230(94)00118-K (doi:10.1016/0361-9230(94)00118-K) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu Y. C., Salamone J. D., Sachs B. D. 1997. Lesions in medial preoptic area and bed nucleus of stria terminalis: differential effects on copulatory behavior and noncontact erection in male rats. J. Neurosci. 17, 5245–5253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Demski L. S., Bauer D. H., Gerald J. W. 1975. Sperm release evoked by electrical stimulation of the fish brain: a functional-anatomical study. J. Exp. Zool. 191, 215–232 10.1002/jez.1401910209 (doi:10.1002/jez.1401910209) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kyle A. L., Peter R. E. 1982. Effects of forebrain lesions on spawning behaviour in the male goldfish. Physiol. Behav. 28, 1103–1109 10.1016/0031-9384(82)90183-4 (doi:10.1016/0031-9384(82)90183-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Koyama Y., Satou M., Oka Y., Ueda K. 1984. Involvement of the telencephalic hemispheres and the preoptic area in sexual behavior of the male goldfish, Carassius auratus: a brain-lesion study. Behav. Neural Biol. 40, 70–86 10.1016/S0163-1047(84)90182-1 (doi:10.1016/S0163-1047(84)90182-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Satou M., Oka Y., Kusunoki M., Matsushima T., Kato M., Fujita I., Ueda K. 1984. Telencephalic and preoptic areas integrate sexual behavior in hime salmon (landlocked red salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka): results of electrical brain stimulation experiments. Physiol. Behav. 33, 441–447 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90167-7 (doi:10.1016/0031-9384(84)90167-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Carruth L. L., Reisert I., Arnold A. P. 2002. Sex chromosome genes directly affect brain sexual differentiation. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 933–934 10.1038/nn922 (doi:10.1038/nn922) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.De Vries G. J., et al. 2002. A model system for study of sex chromosome effects on sexually dimorphic neural and behavioral traits. J. Neurosci. 22, 9005–9014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Agate R. J., Grisham W., Wade J., Mann S., Wingfield J., Schanen C., Palotie A., Arnold A. P. 2003. Neural, not gonadal, origin of brain sex differences in a gynandromorphic finch. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4873–4878 10.1073/pnas.0636925100 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0636925100) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lauber A. H., Mobbs C. V., Muramatsu M., Pfaff D. W. 1991. Estrogen receptor messenger RNA expression in rat hypothalamus as a function of genetic sex and estrogen dose. Endocrinology 129, 3180–3186 10.1210/endo-129-6-3180 (doi:10.1210/endo-129-6-3180) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Westberry J. M., Trout A. L., Wilson M. E. 2010. Epigenetic regulation of estrogen receptor α gene expression in the mouse cortex during early postnatal development. Endocrinology 151, 731–740 10.1210/en.2009-0955 (doi:10.1210/en.2009-0955) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schwarz J. M., Nugent B. M., McCarthy M. M. 2010. Developmental and hormone-induced epigenetic changes to estrogen and progesterone receptor genes in brain are dynamic across the life span. Endocrinology 151, 4871–4881 10.1210/en.2010-0142 (doi:10.1210/en.2010-0142) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Black M. P., Balthazart J., Baillien M., Grober M. S. 2005. Socially induced and rapid increases in aggression are inversely related to brain aromatase activity in a sex-changing fish, Lythrypnus dalli. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 2435–2440 10.1098/rspb.2005.3210 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3210) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Forlano P. M., Bass A. H. 2005. Steroid regulation of brain aromatase expression in glia: female preoptic and vocal motor nuclei. J. Neurobiol. 65, 50–58 10.1002/neu.20178 (doi:10.1002/neu.20178) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Diotel N., et al. 2010. Aromatase in the brain of teleost fish: expression, regulation and putative functions. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 31, 172–192 10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.01.003 (doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.01.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES