Abstract
Roseomonas sp. strain B5 was isolated from Malaysian tropical soil that showed N-acylhomoserine lactone degradation. This is the first genome announcement of a member from the genus of Roseomonas and the first report on the quorum-quenching activity of Roseomonas spp.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Members of the genus Roseomonas belong to Alphaproteobacteria and are pale-pink-pigmented, aerobic, nonmotile, Gram-negative bacteria (6, 17). Although the natural reservoir of Roseomonas spp. remains unknown, they have been recovered from environmental sources such as water and soil (7, 13, 18). Roseomonas spp. have also been isolated from clinical samples, including blood, wounds, peritoneal dialysis fluid, and bone (2, 3, 6, 8, 10, 17). Roseomonas spp. appear to have low pathogenic potential for humans, but some species may cause clinically serious or even fatal diseases, especially in immunocompromised patients (10).
Quorum sensing refers to the phenomenon of regulation of gene expression in a population-dependent manner. Quorum sensing in proteobacteria usually involves production, secretion, and binding of signaling molecules called N-acylhomoserine lactones (AHL) to the cognate receptor protein (11). Interference of AHL-dependent quorum sensing, commonly known as quorum quenching, may be the novel way to attenuate bacterial virulence production (11), but such activity has not been reported in members of the Roseomonas genus. Here, we present the draft genome of Roseomonas sp. strain B5, a quorum-quenching bacterium isolated from Malaysian tropical soil enriched using a published method (4). We sequenced the whole genome of Roseomonas sp. strain B5 as a step toward understanding quorum-quenching activity in this bacterium.
Genomic DNA of Roseomonas sp. strain B5 was isolated using the QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol. The quality of DNA was examined by using both a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) and a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies). Whole-genome shotgun sequencing was performed by using the Illumina MiSeq personal sequencer platform (Illumina, Inc., CA). The resulting nucleotide sequences were trimmed and de novo assembled using Genomics Workbench version 5.1 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark), which yielded 4,242,856 reads from 245 contigs with approximately 98-fold coverage. An N50 quality measurement of the contig was 49 kb, with an average contig size of 19 kb, and the largest contig assembled was approximately 202 kb. The genome contains 471,409,596 bp with a G+C content of 70.5%. Prodigal version 2.60 (12) was performed to predict open reading frames (ORFs), resulting in 4,365 ORFs. These ORFs were further annotated by comparison with NCBI-NR and Blast2GO (5). A total of 51 tRNAs were predicted using tRNAscan-SE (v.1.21) (16). One complete rRNA operon, one copy each of a 5S rRNA gene, 23S rRNA gene, and 16S rRNA gene, was identified by using RNAmmer (15).
BLASTX against a quorum-quenching lactonase database acquired from the UniProtKB protein knowledgebase (1) was performed to search for possible AHL-degrading genes. One predicted protein-coding sequence (CDS) encoding 263 amino acids that shows 84% similarity to the reported attM gene, an AHL-degrading gene (9, 14), was detected. Hence, the genome sequence of Roseomonas sp. strain B5 may provide insights into the quorum-quenching activity of this soil bacterium.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number ALOX00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, ALOX01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the High Impact Research Grant (A000001-50001) to K.-G. Chan from the University of Malaya, which is gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
- 1. Apweiler R, et al. 2004. UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:D115–D119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bard JD, Deville JG, Summanen PH, Lewinski MA. 2010. Roseomonas mucosa isolated from bloodstream of pediatric patient. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:3027–3029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bibashi E, Soflanou D, Kontonpoulou K, Mitsopoulos E, Kokolina E. 2000. Peritonitis due to Roseomonas fauriae in a patient undergoing ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:456–457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Chan KG, Yin WF, Sam CK, Koh CL. 2009. A novel medium for the isolation of N-acylhomoserine lactone-degrading bacteria. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 36:247–251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Conesa A, et al. 2005. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21:3674–3676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Dé I, Rolston KVI, Han XY. 2004. Clinical significance of Roseomonas species isolated from catheter and blood samples: analysis of 36 cases in patients with cancer. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:1579–1584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Furuhata K, et al. 2008. Roseomonas stagni sp. nov., isolated from pond water in Japan. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 54:167–171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Han XY, et al. 2003. Bacteriologic characterization of 36 strains of Roseomonas species and proposal of Roseomonas mucosa sp. nov and Roseomonas gilardii subsp. rosea subsp. nov. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 120:256–264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Haudecoeur E, et al. 2009. Different regulation and roles of lactonases AiiB and AttM in Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 22:529–537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hogue R, Graves M, Moler S, Janda JM. 2007. Pink-pigmented non-fermentative gram-negative rods associated with human infections: a clinical and diagnostic challenge. Infection 3:126–133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hong KW, Koh CL, Sam CK, Yin WF, Chan KG. 2012. Quorum quenching revisited—from signal decays to signaling confusion. Sensors 12:4661–4696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hyatt D, et al. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Jiang CY, Dai X, Wang BJ, Zhou YG, Liu SJ. 2006. Roseomonas lacus sp. nov., isolated from freshwater lake sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56:25–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Khan SR, Farrand SK. 2009. The BlcC (AttM) lactonase of Agrobacterium tumefaciens does not quench the quorum-sensing system that regulates Ti plasmid conjugative transfer. J. Bacteriol. 191:1320–1329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lagesen K, et al. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:3100–3108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:955–964 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Rihs JD, et al. 1993. Roseomonas, a new genus associated with bacteremia and other human infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:3275–3283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Oh HW, Oh TK. 2007. Roseomonas terrae sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:2485–2488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
