Abstract
In thermophoresis, with the fluid at rest, suspensions move along a gradient of temperature. In an aqueous solution, a PEG polymer suspension is depleted from the hot region and builds a concentration gradient. In this gradient, DNA polymers of different sizes can be separated. In this work the effect of the polymer structure for genomic DNA and small RNA is studied. For genome-size DNA, individual single T4 DNA is visualized and tracked in a PEG solution under a temperature gradient built by infrared laser focusing. We find that T4 DNA follows steps of depletion, ring-like localization, and accumulation patterns as the PEG volume fraction is increased. Furthermore, a coil–globule transition for DNA is observed for a large enough PEG volume fraction. This drastically affects the localization position of T4 DNA. In a similar experiment, with small RNA such as ribozymes we find that the stem–loop folding of such polymers has important consequences. The RNA polymers having a long and rigid stem accumulate, whereas a polymer with stem length less than 4 base pairs shows depletion. Such measurements emphasize the crucial contribution of the double-stranded parts of RNA for thermal separation and selection under a temperature gradient. Because huge temperature gradients are present around hydrothermal vents in the deep ocean seafloor, this process might be relevant, at the origin of life, in an RNA world hypothesis. Ribozymes could be selected from a pool of random sequences depending on the length of their stems.
Keywords: molecular transport, DNA condensation, oligonucleotides sorting
In 1824, Carnot (1) showed that in a two-temperature system, the transformation of heat into mechanical motion is possible. This implied two thermal reservoirs, one at high temperature to supply heat and another one at lower temperature to receive the discarded heat. This led to the second law of thermodynamics but also showed how universal the operation of heat engines, the vector for the first industrial revolution, is. However, temperature differences also play essential roles in our planet, leading to platetectonics (another heat engine) (2) and various aspects of meteorology through atmospheric thermal convection (3). Those phenomena are large in scale, kilometers or more.
For smaller scales, it was observed in the 1980s that deep in the ocean, along the ridges separating tectonic plates, thermal vents are present (4), injecting enriched water at temperatures up to 400 °C into an ocean of surrounding temperature 5 °C. Those vents are meter length in scale, with a large number of pores in the vents ranging from micrometers to a millimeter. Thus, small length scale temperature gradients in the pores are also part of natural phenomena. Thus, applied to all length scales, temperature differences carve continents, the weather, and may be living systems as well.
It has been suggested that thermal vents could be the location where life originates, given the presence of seawater, various chemical compounds emitted by small volcanoes, the high temperature of the emitted fluid with cold fluid around, and also complete isolation from devastating UV solar radiation (4). Following such hypothesis, and assuming an RNA world at the origin of life, we performed many experiments to test the effect of temperature gradients on DNA and RNA and showed that accumulation (5), amplification (6), and length-dependent selection of DNA (7) are possible. We demonstrated that in such temperature gradients one could accumulate many-fold DNA by combining thermophoresis and convection (5). We showed then that an amplifier of DNA, PCR type, can be effective in thermal convection (6), where the time oscillation of temperature in PCR is replaced by a space oscillation in convection. Finally, we recently demonstrated that a temperature gradient separates dsDNA of different sizes when it is in solution with another polymer of a large volume fraction (7), a phenomenon similar to gel electrophoresis. Thus, the typical laboratory manipulations are possible in a temperature gradient.
In this article we have revisited DNA and RNA in a temperature gradient and in the presence of a large volume fraction of PEG, a highly soluble polymer in water. Focusing an infrared laser beam, PEG moves away from the hot region, balanced by diffusion (5, 7–9). The resulting equilibrium is an exponentially increasing concentration of PEG toward its equilibrium value far from the laser beam. This creates an entropic potential well in which DNA or RNA polymers localize themselves depending on their length, as was shown previously (7).
However, the size of a DNA polymer depends on its folding structure, which is relevant when dealing with long DNA (typically 15 times the persistent length or more). In the presence of a large amount of another polymer as a crowding agent such as PEG, DNA may fall into a highly compact globule of a few tens of nanometers instead of a random coil, the coil–globule transition (10–17). We present here single-molecule measurements on T4 DNA, where we also observe the coupling of this folding transition with transport driven by a temperature gradient.
We have previously studied thermal separation of RNA whose size varies from 100 bp (as small as transfer RNA) to a few thousand base pairs (as long as messenger RNA) (7). Small RNA has a wide range of functions such as ribozyme, riboswitch, and noncoding RNA molecules (18). In those small functional RNAs, the stem–loop structure is the basic motif for RNA folding, with a rigid stem (50-nm persistence length) and a flexible loop. We find that the selection of RNA depends on the total length of the stems. Hence, this motif selection induces some sequence selection. A consequence of this effect concerns the origin of life hypothesis near thermal vents where temperature gradients may select ribozymes in the pores present in the solid deposits (4, 18, 19).
Results
Thermophoresis of Polymer Mixtures.
We use focused laser heating to create a temperature gradient in a Tris-buffered solution supplemented with PEG10000 polymer with up to 5.0% volume fraction (Fig. 1A; Materials and Methods). The maximum temperature difference is 5.0 K and typical temperature gradient ∼0.25 K/μm. Thermophoresis depletes a PEG polymer from the hot region and builds a concentration gradient of PEG (5). As PEG concentration increased, we observed that solutes such as DNA and RNA showed depletion, ring-like localization, and accumulation (Fig. 1B) (7). We have proposed a phenomenological model that takes into account hydrodynamics effects driven by the PEG osmotic pressure gradient (7, 20–26). The equation for the flow of PEG molecule
is
where
is the PEG concentration,
is the PEG diffusion constant, and
is the thermal diffusion constant. The PEG concentration gradient in a radius
from the heated center, at steady state, yields
where
is the Soret coefficient, defined as
;
and
are temperatures at
and at infinity, respectively. In our experiment
is 0.064 [1/K].
Fig. 1.
Thermophoresis of DNA in a PEG solution. (A) Experimental setup. Schematic of the polymer mixture of DNA (blue) and PEG (green) under infrared laser focusing (red) is shown. (B) Depletion (Left), ring-like localization (Center), and accumulation (Right) of T4 DNA in 0%, 2.5%, and 5.0% PEG solutions respectively. Plot shows the relative concentration of T4 DNA in three different PEG solutions. (Scale bars, 35 μm.)
Given the presence of another solute, DNA, of small volume fraction, whose concentration is
, it experiences thermophoresis and diffusiophoresis, the effect of the PEG concentration-dependent restoring forces (21). The flow of DNA (and RNA),
, can be written phenomenologically as
where
is the diffusiophoretic velocity of DNA,
is the Boltzmann constant,
is the viscosity of the bulk solution, and
is the depth of a steric repulsion of PEG from the surface of DNA (7, 25). Given a PEG radius of gyration
, its center of mass is expelled up to a distance
from the DNA, thus
. In addition, in the presence of a temperature gradient, the thermal energy has a spatial dependence
, which leads to the
term in
. At steady state
, the distribution of the DNA concentration
is
where
is the DNA concentration at infinity,
(no slip condition), and
is the radius of DNA. According to this model, ring-like localization results from the interplay between thermophoresis and diffusiophoresis originating from the osmotic pressure of PEG near the surface of DNA (7). Small salt ions concentration is present in the solution, but we can neglect their effects for this localization as they have a large diffusion constant.
Fig. 2A shows the phase diagram of the localization patterns as a function of the DNA length from 250 bp up to 166 kbp of T4 DNA (T4 phage genome DNA) as a function of the PEG polymer concentration. We find that the position of the radius of accumulated dsDNA,
, exhibits a nonmonotonic behavior as a function of DNA length with a minimum at
= 5 × 103 base pairs (bp) (Fig. 2B). For long DNA from 5.6 to 166 kbp, the diameter of ring localization expands. For short DNA up to 5.6 kbp and RNA up to 3 kb (7) the ring diameter decreases, following a behavior analogous to gel electrophoresis. The ring diameter decreases linearly from 2.0 to 3.5% but changes little from 3.5 to 4.5% (Fig. 2C).
Fig. 2.
(A) Phase diagram of depletion, ring-like localization, and accumulation for DNA molecules from 250 to 166 kbp. (B) Ring radius
as a function of DNA length
in 2.5% PEG solution. Lines are fitted to DNA below 5.6 kbp (purple line) and above 5.6 kbp (blue line). (C) Ring radius with respect to PEG volume fraction.
Thermophoresis of T4 DNA in a PEG Solution.
Why does dsDNA longer than 5.6 kbp show a wide range of ring-like localization?
This hints at a change in the DNA configuration that occurs around this length. The origin of this transition is the large difference in the natural length scale of the polymers: PEG has a persistence length of about
= 0.35 nm, whereas the persistence length of dsDNA is larger by two orders of magnitude:
= 50 nm (150 bp). Thus, short dsDNA of up to a few hundred base pairs has only a few persistence lengths. Such dsDNA is therefore in the semiflexible regime, a rather stiff rod with a few bends surrounded by the much more flexible PEG. Only longer dsDNA strands have enough twists and turns to make a polymer blob, which geometrically defines an “inside” and an “outside” and a corresponding PEG concentration gradient. When the DNA length becomes large enough it is then compressed and moves away from the trap as if it is a small DNA. Then, the osmotic pressure of PEG of order
will overcome the resistance of the DNA blob and lead to intrachain DNA condensation (SI Appendix) (15–17, 27, 28).
To verify this hypothesis, we move to single-molecule studies of the T4 phage genome DNA. Because T4 DNA is 166 kbp long and 57 μm in end-to-end distance, this DNA is large enough to be detected and tracked as individual DNA.
PEG Induces the Compaction of Single T4 DNA.
Single DNA visualization was performed in various PEG concentrations but in the absence of a temperature gradient. T4 DNA in a water solution buffered with Tris elongates and subsequently relaxes to an equilibrium state within a second, like a random coil. The length of T4 DNA stretching due to thermal conformational fluctuation, averaged over more than 100 molecules, was 3.5 μm. We find a transition for the mean length of stretched axis for T4 DNA as a function of PEG volume fraction (Fig. 3). The onset of compaction for T4 DNA is around 2.0% PEG volume fraction (Fig. 3A). From 2.0 to 5.0% PEG, a certain proportion of DNA is compacted into a single dot whereas others fluctuate as semiflexible polymers. Furthermore, as the PEG concentration is increased, the proportion of compacted DNA increases as in a subcritical bifurcation (15, 29).
Fig. 3.
Single T4 DNA in a PEG solution. (A) Single T4 DNA molecules in 0%, 2.0%, and 5.0% PEG solutions. Scale bars, 4 μm. Actual size of compacted DNA is a few tens of nanometers (15, 16) below the diffraction limit of our epifluorescent microscope. (B) (Left) Mean sizes of coil and globule DNA as a function of PEG volume fraction. Coil–globule transition for T4 DNA occurs at 2.0% PEG. (Right) Probability distributions of the stretched axis for individual T4 DNA. Red dotted lines are fitted curves with two Gaussian functions.
Note that the PEG volume fraction at the onset of the coil–globule transition is close to the calculated critical volume fraction
of 1.5% PEG (30, 31) but smaller than the
of 4.0% obtained from the measurement by Hansen et al. (32). This difference may come from the density of DNA in our experiment and the positive charged ions present. The condensation of T4 DNA occurs at a lower PEG concentration in the presence of small salt, called Ψ condensation (33–35).
A dsDNA blob within a PEG solution is subjected to three forces: the osmotic pressure of PEG due to the lower PEG concentration inside the blob, the osmotic pressure of the counterions that neutralize the charges along the DNA, and the elasticity of the DNA that opposes compression and extension away from the free-chain gyration radius. In thermodynamic equilibrium the three corresponding pressures should balance each other. Because PEG particles are free to exchange between the blob and it surrounding, the chemical potential of the PEG is also equilibrated between the inside and the outside. Analysis of the thermodynamic equilibrium (SI Appendix) exhibits a subcritical bifurcation in the folding as a function of PEG concentration (Fig. 3B): below
2.0% the DNA is in a dilute “coil” configuration, whereas above the coil configuration coexists with a dense globular state of much smaller DNA particles. Force balance acting on the DNA determines the size of the coil and the globule. In the coil state the elasticity opposes the expansion driven by the counterion pressure, whereas in the dense globule the elasticity resists the compression due to the PEG concentration gradient.
Dynamics of Single T4 DNA in Temperature Gradient and PEG Concentration Gradients.
We combine single DNA observation with the thermophoresis experiment. Single T4 DNA was clearly detected within the area of ring-like localization in 2.5% PEG solution (Fig. 4A). Individual T4 DNA was trapped under a PEG concentration and temperature gradients with observable fluctuations.
Fig. 4.
Dynamics of single T4 DNA in PEG concentration gradients. (A) T4 DNA forms ring-like localization in 2.5% PEG solution. Scale bar, 35 μm. (B) Trajectories of single T4 DNA in X–Y plane and t axis; (Left) 1.5% PEG, (Center) 2.5% PEG, and (Right) 4.0% PEG. Pseudocolor maps at the top are fluorescent images taken at t = 20 s.
We then examined the dynamics of thermophoresis of single T4 DNA. Thermophoreosis excludes DNA away from the hot region whereas a PEG concentration gradient pushes it back to the center. According to this scenario, when T4 DNA forms ring-like localization, two opposite motions, out from hot to cold in the center and from cold to hot in the periphery, occur. To test this argument we track the motion of single T4 DNA during the ring-like localization in various PEG concentrations.
Fig. 4B shows T4 DNA particle trajectories as a function of time. We detect single T4 DNA moving along a temperature gradient in 1.5%, 2.5%, and 4.0% PEG solutions (36) and show representative trajectories. In 1.5% PEG, at which ring-like localization occurs, T4 DNA exhibited thermal Brownian motion and gradually moved to the region of ring-like localization (Fig. S1). In addition, thermophoretic motion escaping from the hot region is observed in a part of T4 DNA (Fig. 4B, Left). In 2.5% PEG solution, where ring-like localization occurs, DNA is immediately expelled from the hot region, but after about 1 s DNA gradually moves from the periphery inward (Fig. 4B, Center). From 3.0 to 4.0% PEG solutions all T4 DNA move from the cold periphery to the hot center (Fig. 4B, Right). Motion from hot to cold is rarely observed. This result indicates that the force from the PEG concentration gradient occurs instantaneously and plays a dominant effect for ring-like localization, building a potential wall.
In both 2.5% and 4.0% PEG, the direction of velocity shows no correlation effects subsequent to the onset of thermophoresis but less fluctuation as T4 DNA approaches its localization position (Fig. S2). Ichikawa et al. have shown that the relaxation time for T4 DNA stretching is ∼3 s (26), which is much longer than the relaxation observed in our experiment. This implies that the observed fluctuation in the T4 DNA motion is dominantly Brownian.
Moreover, we found that the velocity of single T4 DNA increases from 2 to 3 μm/s, 30 μm away from the localization spot to 10 μm/s, very close to the localization region in 4.0% PEG solution (Fig. 5). The change from Brownian to persistent motion with slight acceleration indicates that the PEG potential wall is sharp close to the localization.
Fig. 5.
Velocity of single T4 DNA molecule as a function of time. Traces of velocity evolution in five different DNA are shown in (A) 2.5% PEG and (B) 4.0% PEG. The fitted curve (dashed line) indicates the proportional increase of velocity as time advances.
Thermophoresis and Sequence Dependence of Small RNA.
In the RNA world hypothesis, tiny RNA polymers with stable sequences must emerge and be selected from a pool of random sequences. They might be the precursor motif of ribozymes. In this second part, we investigate small RNA and show that thermal gradient allows some sequence selection of small RNA.
RNA itself can also be selected in a temperature gradient in the presence of PEG of 5.0% volume fraction. The selection will depend on the RNA folding state. The stem–loop structure is the basic motif for RNA folding with a rigid double-stranded stem and a flexible loop. We show that no accumulation is observed for short poly-thymidine oligodeoxy-ribonucleotides (poly-T) and poly-uracil oligoribonucleotides (poly-U) where no stems are present, whereas accumulation is observed for stem–loop structures. The selection of RNA will depend on the total length of the rigid stem. Furthermore, as the stem length increases, the rate of accumulation increases. An interesting consequence of this effect is that this size selection implies some sequence selection due to complementarity of the stem. This is evidence of selection of small RNA in thermophoresis. Thus, a temperature gradient could select small ribozymes in the pores present in the solid deposits of thermal vents.
We find that single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) having a stem–loop module accumulates at the hot region, whereas a poly-U of ssRNA, unable to form stems, exhibits depletion (Fig. 6A). The accumulation of small dsDNA depends linearly on the PEG concentration. The effect of ssRNA or ssDNA as a function of the stem length (number of base pairs) is quantified in Fig. 6B. We found that stem–loop RNA/DNA shows an accumulation for stem length longer than 5 bp but a depletion below. The rate of accumulation increases as the stem length elongates. Moreover, a self-acylating ribozyme with 6-bp double strand (37, 38) also exhibited an accumulation (Fig. 6B). This suggests that the length of rigid stem is important for the force generated by the PEG concentration gradient.
Fig. 6.
Selection of stem–loop RNA in the PEG concentration gradient. (A) Stem–loop RNA with 12-bp stem (Upper) and ssRNA poly-U of 15 nucleotides (Lower). Plot shows the relative concentration of stem–loop RNA (red line) and the poly-U (black line). Scale bars, 35 μm. (B) Accumulation of stem–loop RNA (green circles), stem–loop DNA (red circles), and a ribozyme (blue circle). We use the effective Soret coefficient
(the definition is shown in Materials and Methods). Positive values of
represents accumulation, whereas negative values of
correspond to depletion. (C) Comparison of accumulation or depletion of dsDNA, dsRNA, ssDNA poly-T, and ssRNA poly-U.
We examined this hypothesis by studying the thermophoresis of a folded, double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and dsDNA in the PEG solution. A similar transition curve from depletion to accumulation above 8 bp was observed (Fig. 6C). However, for a conformation of 40 nucleotides poly-U ssRNA and up to 124 nucleotides poly-T ssDNA, accumulation was not observed (Fig. 6C). This provides evidence that the Soret effect in the polymer solution is sensitive to the total length of stems for an RNA or DNA polymer. The 8-bp stem length (∼2.7 nm) is comparable to the pore size of 5.0% PEG network (∼4 nm). However, the estimated size of ssRNA/ssDNA without a 40-bp stem (∼5 nm) is also comparable to the PEG network (39). This suggests that the polymer rigidity due to the presence of a double-stranded stem rather than its size affects the osmotic force from a PEG concentration gradient.
Salt Dependence of Sequence Selection.
In addition, the accumulation is reduced as the concentration of charge salt increases and dsDNA/dsRNA uniformly distribute eventually in 500 mM NaCl or 50 mM MgCl2 (Fig. 7). This suggests that charge effects such as electrostatic screening and dipole interaction between dsDNA/dsRNA and PEG mediate the accumulation, whereas the depletion of ssDNA/ssRNA become small in the presence of high concentration of salts (Fig. 7). The effective Soret coefficient at 500 mM NaCl is comparable with the offset of the Soret coefficient in water. The charge of the salt may change the size of the ssDNA and ssRNA in the measured salt concentrations because the osmotic pressure from PEG compresses RNA, whose electrostatic repulsion is significantly screened. It may also be likely to consider the change of molecule size (40, 41) to account for the change of the effective Soret coefficient for ssDNA and ssRNA.
Fig. 7.
Salt dependence for dsDNA of 20 bp and ssDNA polyT of 40 nucleotides. In the presence of NaCl (A) and MgCl2 (B), the effective Soret coefficient was close to zero value, indicating that the accumulation of small RNA and DNA was suppressed.
Conclusion
We have described an experimental study of thermophoresis for long-genome DNA and short RNA. In the presence of another polymer of large volume fraction, those biopolymers move toward the heated center, whereas they are expelled from the hot region in a simple water solution. The PEG concentration gradient generates entropic forces on DNA counterbalancing thermophoresis. At the intermediate PEG concentration, this interplay localizes DNA as a ring-like pattern. We also observe that the size of ring-like localization of DNA has a singular point at around 5.6 kbp. The model based on the semiflexible polymer chain surrounded by PEG molecules predicts that the effect of condensation appears at ∼10 kbp, which is in good agreement with our experiment. Indeed, our single-molecule observation confirmed that long DNA such as T4 DNA is compacted in the presence of more than 2.0% PEG, and this dramatically changes the DNA size from 3.5-μm length of the long major axis to less than 0.5 μm (15, 17). The reduction of effective DNA size may decrease the entropic force from PEG concentration gradient and result in the wider range of ring localization from 2.0 to 4.5% PEG. We also measured the local PEG concentration where T4 DNA was localized. The obtained values were correspondingly 1.8–3.5% PEG. In this PEG range DNA is condensed.
The tracking of individual single T4 DNA allowed us to analyze the dynamics of thermophoresis in a polymer solution. One key observation was the acceleration of T4 DNA when it approaches the stable point where T4 DNA localizes. The velocity of T4 DNA is proportional to the gradient of PEG concentration and it migrates toward the localization point (7). There the DNA molecule has fastest velocity and this mechanism is consistent with our observation.
In the second part we studied thermophoresis of short RNA such as a ribozyme (18, 37). Given the small radius of gyration of PEG, entropic force can act on short RNA and DNA. It leads to accumulation in a temperature gradient.
The interesting result is that this entropic force overcomes thermophoresis only for a long enough stem in stem–loop RNA. Thermal separation of DNA and RNA might be relevant to molecular evolution at the origin of life: Separation of small RNA from a large library of RNA world might occur at the thermal vent. Thus, separation and accumulation are physically feasible in a temperature gradient at the early stage of life (4, 5, 7).
Intriguingly, we have shown recently that we can trap shorter RNA (1.0 kb) of a small volume fraction in a gradient of longer RNA (rRNA) of large volume fraction (Fig. S3). This result means that our finding is a general phenomenon, and does not depend on the PEG specificity.
Materials and Methods
Experimental Setups for Thermophoresis.
The solution is enclosed in a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, Sylgard 184; Dow Corning) microchannel. A single channel 10 μm thick and 500 μm wide was closed with a cleaned glass slide to suppress thermal convection and sealed with a fast-curing epoxy (Araldite Rapid, Huntsman). The whole experiment was maintained at room temperature (
= 24 °C). The temperature gradient
was built by focusing an infrared laser beam (FOL1402PNJ; Furukawa Electronics, λ = 1480 nm) on the PDMS chamber with the objective lens ×32. Dieletrophoresis due to the electric field of laser light is negligible. Temperature difference at the radial distance was measured by the intensity drop of fluorescent dye 2′,7′-bis(-2-carboxyethyl)-5-(6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF, Molecular Probes) at 1 mM solution. Fluorescence of BCECF decreases linearly with a slope −1.3%/K. Maximal temperature increase is
= 5 K for T4 DNA experiment and
= 3 K for small RNA/DNA experiment. We used smaller temperature gradient to fit to exponential distribution (see
in Effective Soret Coefficient for Small RNA) without ring-like localization. Small RNA can show the localization as well under a bigger temperature gradient.
Visualization and Imaging.
For thermophoresis experiment, we visualized T4 DNA, small RNA, and small DNA with SYBR gold fluorescent dye (Molecular Probes). Fluorescence of DNA and RNA molecules was detected using an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus; IX70) and recorded with the Retiga CCD camera (QImaging). SYBR gold dye depends on temperature with linear slopes of –3.2%/K and –1.1%/K for ssDNA/ssRNA and dsDNA/dsRNA, respectively. We thus obtained relative concentration of DNA/RNA after the rescaling of this temperature dependence.
We tracked single T4 DNA stained by YOYO-1 instead of SYBR gold. Time-lapse movies of thermophoresis for single T4 DNA were taken at a camera set for 10 frames/s, maximum binning, region of interest of 85 μm × 85 μm. Image analysis was performed with MATLAB software (MathWorks). We measured the center of mass of single DNA from fluorescent intensity profile by fitting a 2D Gaussian distribution function
(ref. 36).
Single DNA visualization for coil-globule transition was performed using an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon; ECLIPSE) with a ×100 objective lens and recorded with an electron multiplying CCD camera (Andor; iXon).
Chemical Reagents.
Polyethylene glycol 10,000 (PEG) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. The powder of PEG was dissolved in 10 mM Tris⋅HCl buffer (pH 7.5). We mixed DNA and RNA in a PEG10000 solution of various volume fractions. DNA–PEG solutions were kept at 4 °C for at least 24 h after mixing.
T4 DNA was purchased from Nippon Gene, Ltd. T4 DNA was dissolved in 10 mM Tris⋅HCl buffer solution (pH 7.4) at 100 ng/μL. After 1,000× dilution of T4 DNA solution (
∼ 0.02%), we mixed YOYO-1 fluorescent dye that intercalates into base pairs in DNA with T4 DNA at a ratio of 1,000:1.
Short DNA and RNA were hybridized from oligonucleotide primers. Repeated heating and cooling between 60 and 16 °C was done to make homogeneous and thermodynamically stable folding in DNA and RNA. Nucleotide sequences are shown in SI Materials and Methods.
Effective Soret Coefficient for Small RNA.
To measure the transition from depletion to accumulation for small DNA and RNA, we defined the effective Soret coefficient
as
.
is related to Eq. 4 as
(SI Appendix).
depends on the stem length and it subsequently affects RNA accumulation. The positive sign of
means an accumulation, whereas a negative sign corresponds to depletion. Its value reflects the rate of accumulation or depletion.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank A. Buguin and A. Grosberg for theoretical model, P. Kumar and J. Merrin for discussions and comments on the manuscript, and F. Scott, Y. Shimamoto, T. M. Kapoor, and M. Ichikawa for single DNA visualization. This work was supported by a fellowship for research abroad from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, a Marie-Josée Henry Kravis Fellowship from the Rockefeller University, Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology from Japan Science and Technology Agency (all to Y.T.M.); and National Science Foundation Grant PHY-0848815 and Florence J. Gould Fellowship at Institute for Advanced Study (both to A.J.L.).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1215764109/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Carnot S. Réflexions sur la Puissance Motrice du Feu et sur les Machines Propres à Développer Cette Puissance. Paris: Bachelier; 1824. [Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire and on Machines Fitted to Develop That Power]. French. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wilson JT. Did the Atlantic close and then re-open? Nature. 1966;211:676–681. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bérnard H. Les tourbillons cellulaires dans une nappe liquide [The cellular vortices in a liquid layer] Rev Gén Sci Pure Appl. 1900;11:1261–1271. French. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Martin W, Baross J, Kelley D, Russell MJ. Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6(11):805–814. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Braun D, Libchaber A. Trapping of DNA by thermophoretic depletion and convection. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;89(18):188103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.188103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Braun D, Goddard NL, Libchaber A. Exponential DNA replication by laminar convection. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;91(15):158103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.158103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Maeda YT, Buguin A, Libchaber A. Thermal separation: Interplay between the Soret effect and entropic force gradient. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;107(3):038301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.038301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Thamdrup LH, Larsen NB, Kristensen A. Light-induced local heating for thermophoretic manipulation of DNA in polymer micro- and nanochannels. Nano Lett. 2010;10(3):826–832. doi: 10.1021/nl903190q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Duhr S, Arduini S, Braun D. Thermophoresis of DNA determined by microfluidic fluorescence. Eur Phys J E. 2004;15(3):277–286. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2004-10073-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lerman LS. A transition to a compact form of DNA in polymer solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1971;68(8):1886–1890. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.8.1886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Laemmli UK. Characterization of DNA condensates induced by poly(ethylene oxide) and polylysine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975;72(11):4288–4292. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.11.4288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zimmerman SB, Minton AP. Macromolecular crowding: Biochemical, biophysical, and physiological consequences. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1993;22:27–65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.22.060193.000331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zimmerman SB, Murphy LD. Macromolecular crowding and the mandatory condensation of DNA in bacteria. FEBS Lett. 1996;390(3):245–248. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00725-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang C, Shao PG, van Kan JA, van der Maarel JRC. Macromolecular crowding induced elongation and compaction of single DNA molecules confined in a nanochannel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(39):16651–16656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904741106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Minagawa K, Matsuzawa Y, Yoshikawa K, Khokhlov AR, Doi M. Direct observation of the coil-globule transition in DNA molecules. Biopolymers. 1994;34:555–558. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vasilevskaya VV, Khokhlov AR, Matsuzawa Y, Yoshikawa K. Collapse of single DNA molecule in poly(ethylene glycol) solutions. J Chem Phys. 1995;102:6595–6602. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kojima M, Kubo K, Yoshikawa K. Elongation/compaction of giant DNA caused by depletion interaction with a flexible polymer. J Chem Phys. 2006;124(2):024902. doi: 10.1063/1.2145752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Serganov A, Patel DJ. Ribozymes, riboswitches and beyond: Regulation of gene expression without proteins. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8(10):776–790. doi: 10.1038/nrg2172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Budin I, Szostak JW. Expanding roles for diverse physical phenomena during the origin of life. Annu Rev Biophys. 2010;39:245–263. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.050708.133753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Piazza R, Parola A. Thermophoresis in colloidal suspensions. J Phys Condens Matter. 2008;20:153102. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Anderson JL. Colloid transport by interfacial forces. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 1989;21:61–99. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Würger A. Thermal non-equilibrium transport in colloids. Rep Prog Phys. 2010;73:126601. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Abécassis B, Cottin-Bizonne C, Ybert C, Ajdari A, Bocquet L. Boosting migration of large particles by solute contrasts. Nat Mater. 2008;7(10):785–789. doi: 10.1038/nmat2254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Palacci J, Abécassis B, Cottin-Bizonne C, Ybert C, Bocquet L. Colloidal motility and pattern formation under rectified diffusiophoresis. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104(13):138302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.138302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jiang HR, Wada H, Yoshinaga N, Sano M. Manipulation of colloids by a nonequilibrium depletion force in a temperature gradient. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;102:208301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.208301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ichikawa M, Yoshikawa K, Matsuzawa Y. Entrapping polymer chain in light well under good solvent condition. J Phys Soc Jpn. 2005;74:1958–1961. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Parsegian VA, Rand RP, Rau DC. Macromolecules and water: Probing with osmotic stress. Methods Enzymol. 1995;259:43–94. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(95)59039-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Parsegian VA, Rand RP, Rau DC. Osmotic stress, crowding, preferential hydration, and binding: A comparison of perspectives. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(8):3987–3992. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.8.3987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bloomfield VA. DNA condensation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1996;6(3):334–341. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(96)80052-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.De Gennes P-G. Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ Press; 1979. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Doi M, Edwards SF. The Theory of Polymer Dynamics. New York: Oxford Science Publications; 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hansen PL, Cohen JA, Podgornik R, Parsegian VA. Osmotic properties of poly(ethylene glycols): Quantitative features of brush and bulk scaling laws. Biophys J. 2003;84(1):350–355. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74855-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Post CB, Zimm BH. Internal condensation of a single DNA molecule. Biopolymers. 1979;18:1487–1501. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Grosberg AY, Erukhimovitch IY, Shakhnovitch EI. On the theory of Ψ condensation. Biopolymers. 1982;21:2413–2432. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zinchenko AA, Yoshikawa K. Na+ shows a markedly higher potential than K+ in DNA compaction in a crowded environment. Biophys J. 2005;88(6):4118–4123. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.057323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cheezum MK, Walker WF, Guilford WH. Quantitative comparison of algorithms for tracking single fluorescent particles. Biophys J. 2001;81(4):2378–2388. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75884-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Illangasekare M, Sanchez G, Nickles T, Yarus M. Aminoacyl-RNA synthesis catalyzed by an RNA. Science. 1995;267(5198):643–647. doi: 10.1126/science.7530860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lehmann J, Reichel A, Buguin A, Libchaber A. Efficiency of a self-aminoacylating ribozyme: Effect of the length and base-composition of its 3′ extension. RNA. 2007;13(8):1191–1197. doi: 10.1261/rna.500907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Morriss-Andrews A, Rottler J, Plotkin SS. A systematically coarse-grained model for DNA and its predictions for persistence length, stacking, twist, and chirality. J Chem Phys. 2010;132(3):035105. doi: 10.1063/1.3269994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kilburn D, Roh JH, Guo L, Briber RM, Woodson SA. Molecular crowding stabilizes folded RNA structure by the excluded volume effect. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(25):8690–8696. doi: 10.1021/ja101500g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nakano S, Karimata HT, Kitagawa Y, Sugimoto N. Facilitation of RNA enzyme activity in the molecular crowding media of cosolutes. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(46):16881–16888. doi: 10.1021/ja9066628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







