Abstract
Gaucher disease (GD) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the acid β-glucocerebrosidase gene. To model GD, we generated human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC), by reprogramming skin fibroblasts from patients with type 1 (N370S/N370S), type 2 (L444P/RecNciI), and type 3 (L444P/L444P) GD. Pluripotency was demonstrated by the ability of GD hiPSC to differentiate to all three germ layers and to form teratomas in vivo. GD hiPSC differentiated efficiently to the cell types most affected in GD, i.e., macrophages and neuronal cells. GD hiPSC-macrophages expressed macrophage-specific markers, were phagocytic, and were capable of releasing inflammatory mediators in response to LPS. Moreover, GD hiPSC-macrophages recapitulated the phenotypic hallmarks of the disease. They exhibited low glucocerebrosidase (GC) enzymatic activity and accumulated sphingolipids, and their lysosomal functions were severely compromised. GD hiPSC-macrophages had a defect in their ability to clear phagocytosed RBC, a phenotype of tissue-infiltrating GD macrophages. The kinetics of RBC clearance by types 1, 2, and 3 GD hiPSC-macrophages correlated with the severity of the mutations. Incubation with recombinant GC completely reversed the delay in RBC clearance from all three types of GD hiPSC-macrophages, indicating that their functional defects were indeed caused by GC deficiency. However, treatment of induced macrophages with the chaperone isofagomine restored phagocytosed RBC clearance only partially, regardless of genotype. These findings are consistent with the known clinical efficacies of recombinant GC and isofagomine. We conclude that cell types derived from GD hiPSC can effectively recapitulate pathologic hallmarks of the disease.
Keywords: Gaucher model, Gaucher macrophages, lipid storage disease, glucosylsphingolipids, erythrophagocytosis
Gaucher disease (GD) is the most frequently inherited lipid storage disease; it primarily affects Ashkenazi Jews, where carrier frequency is 1 in 18 and disease incidence is 1 in 1,000, compared with 1 in 50,000 in the general population (1). GD is caused by mutations in the acid β-glucocerebrosidase (GBA) gene. Type 1 GD is the most common and mildest form of the disease and affects primarily reticuloendothelial cells. The reduced glucocerebrosidase (GC) activity in phagocytic cells results in lysosomal accumulation of glucosylceramide (GlcCer) and other sphingolipids, derived mostly from the breakdown of ingested red and white blood cell membranes (2, 3). Patients affected with type 1 GD exhibit hepatosplenomegaly, hematologic abnormalities, and bone disease (1, 4). Type 2 GD is an acute form of the disease and is usually fatal before 2 y of age. Type 3 GD tends to have a later onset and is subacute. In patients who have type 2 and 3 GD, in addition to hematologic and visceral manifestations, there is brain involvement of unclear etiology. Patients with GD present with heterogeneous symptoms, even among patients with the same GBA mutations. This heterogeneity suggests that genetic background and environmental factors may also influence the severity of the disease (5).
One obstacle to modeling GD is that the disease-affected cell types are not easily available. Human macrophages can be obtained from peripheral blood, but they are difficult to expand in culture, and patient-derived neuronal cell types are even more difficult to procure. GD fibroblasts have been widely used for studying the disease and for therapeutic development, but these cells are nonphagocytic and do not release the inflammatory mediators and hydrolases believed to play a role in GD pathology. Additionally, fibroblasts are of limited utility for studying the underlying causes of neuronopathic GD. These limitations may be overcome by reprogramming patient-derived cells into human induced pluripotent stems cells (hiPSC), as first shown by Yamanaka and coworkers (6, 7). hiPSC have been derived from patients affected by a variety of diseases (8–11), including long QT syndrome (12, 13), familial dysautonomia (14), and Alzheimer's disease (15), and important aspects of the disease phenotype have been recapitulated in the relevant hiPSC-derived cell types (16).
In this study we report the development of hiPSC derived from patients harboring the most frequent mutations associated with development of types 1, 2, and 3 GD. GD hiPSC were differentiated to macrophages and neuronal cells that were found to accumulate sphingolipids in a pathologic manner. In mutant macrophages, GC deficiency resulted in ineffective clearance of phagocytosed RBC, which is a classic hallmark of the disease (17, 18). Moreover, the extent of the functional defect exhibited by types 1, 2, and 3 GD hiPSC-macrophages in vitro reflected the severity of the mutation. Our results suggest that this hiPSC model recapitulates the phenotypic and pathological variants of the disease, and can be a valuable tool for understanding molecular mechanisms and developing therapeutic approaches for GD.
Results
Generation of GD hiPSC.
GD fibroblasts from patients with types 1, 2, and 3 GD were reprogrammed by expression of SOX2, OCT4, KLF4, and MYC after infection with the STEMCCA vector, and initial hiPSC colony selection was based on morphologic resemblance to human embryonic stem cell (hESC) colonies (Fig. S1A). As shown in Fig. 1A, L444P/RecNciI GD hiPSC expressed typical pluripotency surface markers, including SSEA-3, SSEA-4, TRA-1–60, and TRA-1–81. They also expressed undifferentiated ES cell markers such as NANOG, SOX2, and OCT4 but did not express SSEA-1, a marker for differentiation in human cells. Marker analysis was done with five independently derived GD hiPSC lines, all with similar results. Quantitative analysis of marker expression by flow cytometry confirmed that the majority of GD hiPSC expressed these pluripotency markers (Fig. S1B). Similar analysis of independently derived colonies of N370S/N370S (type 1) and L444P/L444P (type 3) GD hiPSC showed that they all expressed pluripotency and undifferentiated ES cell markers (see Fig. S4 A and B). Karyotypic analysis of GD hiPSC lines indicated a normal complement of chromosomes (Fig. S2A).
Pluripotency of GD hiPSC.
Pluripotency of GD hiPSC was demonstrated through their ability to give rise to all three germ layers in vitro and in vivo. After 15 d in differentiation culture, GD embryoid bodies (EBs) from type 2 L444P/RecNciI hiPSC stained positive for the ectodermal markers neuronal-specific tubulin (Tuj1) and microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) (Fig. S2B). These EBs also were positive for the mesodermal marker brachyury and the endodermal marker GATA4. To assay pluripotency in vivo, type 2 GD hiPSC were injected s.c. into NOG/SCID mice. Teratomas arose within 6–8 wk of injection from all three GD hiPSC lines tested (Fig. 1 B, a). Histopathological analysis showed the presence of multiple cell lineages within the benign tumors, representative of all three germ layers, including glandular, intestinal, neuronal, bone, and cartilage structures from the type 2 hiPSC (Fig. 1 B, b–f). The type 1 (N370S/N370S) and type 3 (L444P/L444P) hiPSC also were pluripotent, as assessed in vitro and by teratoma formation in NOG/SCID mice in vivo (see Fig. S4 C and D).
Directed Differentiation of GD hiPSC to Monocyte/Macrophages.
GD hiPSC cultured in suspension as EBs for a week differentiated into hematopoietic cells that stained positive for CD11b and CD14 (Fig. S3B). From around day 15 onwards, round monocyte-like cells arose from the middle of the flattened EBs and floated in the culture medium. Fig. S3A shows different stages of an EB culture that led to monocyte production. Monocytes harvested from the culture supernatant showed a single uniform population, and more than 95% of both GD hiPSC- and control hiPSC-monocytes expressed CD14 (Fig. 2A and Fig. S2C, respectively). Under optimal conditions, monocyte-producing factories yielded more than one million cells per four or five EBs every 4–5 d. The cultures produced monocytes for more than 3 mo, but yields diminished with time.
To generate GD macrophages, GD hiPSC-monocytes were plated onto adherent plates in the presence of M-CSF. After 3 d, May–Grünwald–Giemsa staining showed the presence of cells with the typical appearance of macrophages with round or spread-out morphologies (Fig. 2 C, a–c). These cells expressed typical markers of macrophage differentiation including CD14, CD163, and CD68 (Fig. 2 B, a–c). Similar results were obtained by directed differentiation of control hiPSC (Figs. S2 D, a–c and S3C) and H9/hESC (Fig. S3D), as well as N370S/N370S (Fig. S4E) and L444P/L444P hiPSC (Fig. S4F).
GD hiPSC-Macrophages Phagocyte Opsonized RBC.
Tissue macrophages have multiple functions, including the removal of aged and damaged red and white blood cells from circulation. To determine whether GD macrophages were able to carry out phagocytosis of RBC, L444P/RecNciI type 2 GD macrophages were incubated with opsonized RBC for 2 h at 37 °C. As shown in Fig. 2 D, a and b (live-cell images) and Fig. 2 D, d and e (May–Grünwald–Giemsa staining), the GD hiPSC-macrophages had high phagocytic activity, and the majority of cells were able to ingest 15–50 RBC. This activity also was seen in macrophages derived from two other type 2 GD hiPSC lines we tested. RBC ingestion by GD hiPSC-macrophages was similar to that in control hiPSC- and hESC-macrophages (Fig. S3 E, a and F, a), suggesting that GC deficiency did not alter the erythrophagocytic activity of the mutant macrophages. Type 1 N370S/N370S and type 3 L444P/L444P hiPSC-macrophages were able to phagocytose opsonized RBC with efficiency similar to that of type 2 L444P/RecNciI macrophages.
GD hiPSC-Macrophage Activation in Response to LPS.
To determine whether GD hiPSC-macrophages would respond to bacterial products, we treated control and GD hiPSC-macrophages with the bacterial endotoxin LPS (19). As shown in Fig. 2E, 2-h treatment of control and type 2 GD hiPSC-macrophages with LPS induced the production of high levels of TNF-α, IL-10, IL-12 p35, and IL-12 p40 mRNA. The level of induction of the inflammatory cytokine TNF-α was significantly higher in GD hiPSC- than in control hiPSC-macrophages. Future studies should clarify whether GC deficiency sensitizes GD macrophages toward inflammatory responses, as suggested by clinical observations (3). Taken together, the ability of GD hiPSC-derived macrophages to phagocyte RBC and to respond to LPS strongly suggests that they have the functional properties of mature macrophages.
GD hiPSC-Macrophages Have Reduced GC Activity and Accumulate Sphingolipids.
As shown in Fig. 3A, the GC enzymatic activity in N370S/N370S, L444P/L444P, and L444P/RecNciI hiPSC-macrophages was less than 5% of that in hiPSC-macrophage controls from a healthy donor, even though the mutant proteins in the three types of GD macrophages were still expressed at about 50% of control levels (Fig. 3A). In patients with GD, cells of the reticuloendothelial system display characteristic lipid accumulation because of the inability to digest GlcCer derived from normal metabolism and from the phagocytosis of red and white blood cells. This accumulation leads to the appearance of lipid-engorged Gaucher macrophages (20), in which remnants of RBC are often seen (17, 18, 21, 22). To assess whether GD hiPSC-macrophages would recapitulate the lipid accumulation seen in macrophages of patients with GD, we carried out immunofluorescence analysis using an antibody specific to GlcCer and HPLC-MS/MS. As shown in Fig. 3 B, a and b, mutant hiPSC-macrophages had elevated levels of GlcCer as compared with control cells (Fig. 3 B, c and d). HPLC-MS/MS analysis showed that types 2 and 3 GD hiPSC-macrophages had a 90-fold increase in glucosylsphingosine as compared with control hiPSC-macrophages, whereas type 1 GD macrophages exhibited a lower, but still very significant, 28-fold increase of this lipid (Fig. 3C and Fig. S5). These results show that the levels of GC activity in patient-derived hiPSC-macrophages were not sufficient to catabolize glucosylsphingolipids generated by normal metabolism in the mutant cells, even in case of the milder N370S mutant.
Impaired Clearance of RBC in GD hiPSC-Macrophages.
When characterizing the phagocytic properties of type 2 GD hiPSC-macrophages, we noticed a significant delay in the clearance of ingested RBC by mutant macrophages compared to control macrophages, as determined by direct observation under the microscope. The internalized RBC were visible inside macrophages derived from both control and GD hiPSC-macrophages for a few hours after ingestion. However, we noticed that although ingested RBC were no longer visible in control hiPSC-macrophages after 24 h, remnants of RBC were visible in mutant macrophages even 3 d after erythrophagocytosis. To confirm these observations, we quantified the rate of clearance of phagocytosed RBC by GD hiPSC-macrophages. As shown in Fig. 3D, control hiPSC- and hESC-macrophages were able to clear most of the ingested RBC within 1 d. However, macrophages derived from three different L444P/RecNciI hiPSC lines exhibited a significant delay in RBC clearance (Fig. 3D). Fig. 3E shows the presence of significant numbers of engulfed RBC in the L444P/RecNciI type 2 macrophages (Fig. 3 E, a and b) compared with control macrophages (Fig. 3 E, c and d) 24 h after phagocytosis. L444P/L444P (type 3) and N370S/N370S (type 1) hiPSC-macrophages also exhibited impaired RBC clearance, and the extent of the delay in RBC clearance increased with the severity of the mutation (Fig. 3F). It is worth noting that the level of sphingolipid accumulation was very similar in type 2 L444P/RecNciI and type 3 L444P/L444P hiPSC-macrophages (Fig. 3C), suggesting that the RBC clearance assay was better able to predict clinical subtype than measurement of sphingolipid accumulation.
Because the presence of RBC remnants is a key feature of macrophages that infiltrate bone marrow and other organs in patients with GD (17, 18, 21, 22), the GD hiPSC-macrophages we obtained recapitulate an important hallmark of the disease. This abnormal RBC clearance by mutant macrophages might be caused by blockage of the phagocytic pathway downstream of RBC uptake, because there were no quantitative differences in the rates of RBC ingestion by GD hiPSC-, control hiPSC-, and hESC-macrophages (Fig. 2D and Fig. S3 E, a and F, a). Future analysis should clarify the precise steps in the phagocytic cascade that are blocked, and how this blockage relates to the pathophysiology of GD.
Phenotypic Correction of GD hiPSC-Macrophage Defects by Recombinant GC.
As shown in Fig. 3G, treatment of type 2 L444P/RecNciI hiPSC-macrophages with mannose-exposed recombinant GC restored clearance of phagocytosed RBC in a dose-dependent manner, to almost the same levels as those in control hiPSC-macrophages. Recombinant GC also corrected the defect in RBC clearance in L444P/L444P (type 3) and N370S/N370S (type 1) mutant macrophages (Fig. S6). GC treatment of control hiPSC-macrophages caused only a very slight increase in the rate of RBC clearance. These results suggested that the phenotype we observed was indeed caused by the GC deficiency and, importantly, that the uptake of recombinant GC was able to overcome the deleterious effects of different mutant GC proteins, including the severe L444P and RecNciI mutations in the type 2 hiPSC-macrophages.
Isofagomine Partially Corrects the Abnormal GD hiPSC-Macrophage Phenotype.
Isofagomine is a competitive inhibitor of GC that facilitates folding and transport of GC mutants, including the frequent alleles N370S and L444P (23, 24). Isofagomine has been evaluated as a possible therapeutic agent for GD in cell lines, animal models, and clinical trials (24, 25). Isofagomine treatment of types 1, 2, and 3 GD hiPSC-macrophages increased GC enzymatic activity by about 1.7- to 2.0-fold, as compared with 1.3-fold in control cells (Fig. 3H). To determine whether this drug would have any effect on RBC clearance by GD hiPSC-macrophages, we incubated L444P/RecNciI GD hiPSC-macrophages with isofagomine for 5 d. After this time, the treated macrophages were incubated with opsonized RBC, and the rate of RBC clearance was followed for 3 d in the presence of isofagomine. As shown in Fig. 3I, isofagomine treatment resulted in a partial increase in the rate of clearance of phagocytosed RBC by L444P/RecNciI hiPSC-macrophages. Isofagomine treatment also increased the rates of phagocytosed RBC clearance in L444P/L444P and N370S/N370 hiPSC-macrophages, but it was not as effective as recombinant GC in restoring normal RBC clearance, even in the milder N370S/N370S mutant (Fig. S7D). Similar results were obtained regardless of whether isofagomine was added or omitted during the 3-d period following RBC uptake. Taken together, these results reflect the clinical efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and isofagomine, and suggest that GD hiPSC and the functional RBC assay described in this study will be very valuable for evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of new drugs.
Differentiation of GD hiPSC to the Neuronal Lineage.
We then investigated whether GD hiPSC could be differentiated to neuronal cell types in vitro. Types 1, 2, and 3 GD hiPSC were differentiated to neuronal cells efficiently; representative results are shown for L444P/RecNciI hiPSC in Fig. 4. Neural tube-like rosettes derived from the neuroepithelial cells expressed markers of neuronal differentiation, including MAP2 and Tuj1. Fig. 4 A–E shows the characteristic arrangements of the cells in the rosettes, which were positive for the neural progenitor marker SOX2 and the astrocyte marker GFAP (Fig. 4 D and E). In cultures maintained for over 10–15 d we observed neuronal maturation with establishment of interneuronal connections, and these cells were positive for neuronal-specific markers including Tuj1, MAP2, and GABA (Fig. 4 F–H). These cultures were also positive for dopaminergic neuronal markers such as dopamine β hydroxylase (DβH) and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) (Fig. 4 I and J). The rosettes also gave rise to astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, as determined by GFAP and O4 staining, respectively (Fig. 4 E and K). Importantly, all three types of GD hiPSC-derived neurons had very low GC enzymatic activity (Fig. 4L) and accumulated glucosylsphingolipids (Fig. S8).
Discussion
In this study we describe the generation of hiPSC derived from patients with the three clinical subtypes of GD and their proposed use for disease modeling and therapeutic evaluation. The cells used for hiPSC generation were obtained from an adult donor harboring N370S/N370S (type 1), from a 3-y-old donor with type 3 GD carrying L444P/L444P, and from an infant with type 2 GD with heteroallelic L444P/RecNciI mutations. L444P is the second most frequent mutation among patients with GD, and it is often associated with the severe type 2 and 3 forms of GD. The RecNciI allele results from recombination of the GBA gene with the GBA pseudogene, which harbors an L444P, an A456P, and a silent V460V mutation (26). In type 2 cases, pathological abnormalities are already present in utero, resulting in either fetal mortality or in newborns afflicted by severe visceral and neurological manifestations (4). We have shown that hiPSC-derived cells from all three types of GD have phenotypic abnormalities that increase with the severity of the mutation, and that in every case recombinant GC can reverse these abnormalities.
The most distinguishing histological finding in GD is the presence of Gaucher macrophages in the spleen, liver, and bone marrow, and these cells are believed to be primarily responsible for the visceral, hematologic, and bone pathology in affected individuals (1). GD macrophages are engorged with GlcCer, and GC deficiency also leads to accumulation of glucosylsphingosine, a sphingolipid that is present in very small quantities in normal cells but is highly elevated in tissues of patients who have GD (27). To model the formation of GD macrophages, we carried out directed differentiation of GD hiPSC in the presence of M-CSF. The GD hiPSC-macrophages we obtained had elevated levels of GlcCer and glucosylsphingosine in their resting state. Thus, the level of mutant GC enzyme was insufficient to catabolize glucosylsphingolipids generated by the normal metabolism of the mutant cells, rendering them particularly susceptible to the added digestive burden following erythrophagocytosis. One of the most interesting findings of this study was that GC deficiency resulted in delayed clearance of phagocytosed RBC by GD hiPSC-macrophages. Furthermore, we observed an inverse correlation between the rate of RBC clearance and the severity of the mutation. These observations suggest that the functional assay developed using hiPSC-macrophages may reflect the extent of visceral abnormalities in GD patients, and that GD hiPSC can be very valuable for modeling the molecular and subcellular mechanisms that underlie the pathology of GD. The incomplete digestion of phagocytosed RBC was not secondary to increased uptake of RBC by GD hiPSC-macrophages, because we detected no difference in the rate of erythrophagocytosis between mutant and control macrophages. Rather, the delay in RBC clearance was probably caused by blockage of steps that occur after RBC uptake. Remnants of RBC are frequently observed in Gaucher macrophages isolated from patient bone marrow (17, 18, 21, 22), lending support to the conclusion that the phenotype of GD hiPSC-macrophages that we observed recapitulated that of Gaucher cells.
ERT is the standard of treatment for type 1 GD, and it is also used to alleviate the visceral and hematologic abnormalities in types 2 and 3 GD (28). Cerezyme (imiglucerase; Genzyme), the first enzyme preparation used for ERT, is a recombinant human GC that is modified by glycosidase treatment to facilitate macrophage uptake through mannose receptors. In most patients with type 1 GD, ERT can reduce the visceral and hematologic involvement within 6 mo of the start of regular enzyme infusions (29). Our results showed that incubation of hiPSC-macrophages from all three types of GD with GC restored the clearance of phagocytosed RBC almost to control levels, even in type 2 hiPSC-derived macrophages. Thus, administration of normal GC was able to overcome potential gain-of-function effects of some of the most harmful GBA mutations. These observations suggest that it may be possible to identify new therapeutic agents also capable of reversing the deleterious effects of different GBA mutations. In future studies with a larger and genotypically diverse GD hiPSC collection, we will examine whether the in vitro response of induced macrophages to recombinant GC correlates with the clinical efficacy of ERT to alleviate visceral manifestations of GD in the corresponding donors.
A number of chaperones and other small molecules that have been tested as potential therapeutic candidates for GD have been identified in chemical screens using purified GC, followed by validation using human GD cell lines (30, 31). Isofagomine is a competitive inhibitor of GC that facilitates folding and transport of GC mutants, including the frequent N370S and L444P alleles (32, 33), and has been effective in animal models (24, 25). In a 6-mo phase II clinical trial, isofagomine administration increased GC activity in white blood cells in all patients, including homozygous L444P cases, although meaningful clinical improvement was seen in only 1 of 18 patients (24). Isofagomine treatment of GD hiPSC-macrophages resulted in increased GC activity, but this treatment led to only partial restoration of the ability of types 1, 2, and 3 GD hiPSC-macrophages to clear ingested RBC. Thus, in our system, isofagomine was less effective than recombinant GC in correcting the functional defects of GD hiPSC-macrophages harboring different GBA mutations, reflecting the clinical experience with these therapeutic agents. Taken together, our results strongly suggest that the functional assay reported in this study may be a very discriminating tool for the assessment of therapeutic efficacy. However, this conclusion needs to be validated with a larger patient population for each clinical subtype.
Impaired lysosomal function in GD neurons is likely to interfere with critical cellular functions such as autophagy, intracellular transport, vesicle fusion, and lysosomal clearance of protein aggregates and organelles targeted for degradation (34, 35). Mutations in GBA have been associated with increased risk of Parkinson disease (36), and recent studies using primary cells and GD hiPSC harboring an N370S/84GG genotype (8) showed that dopaminergic neurons exhibited decreased lysosomal protein degradation, accumulation of aggregated α-synuclein, and neurotoxicity (37). In the present study we have shown that GD hiPSC can be efficiently differentiated to neuronal cell types, and that the mutant neurons accumulate glucosylsphingolipids. In future studies, GD hiPSC-neurons will be used for studying the molecular basis of the neuronopathy found in patients with neuronopathic GD.
In summary, we have described the generation of GD hiPSC, their directed differentiation to macrophages and neuronal cells, and have shown their potential to model the functional defects of GD macrophages. GD hiPSC-macrophages recapitulated the lipid storage and impaired RBC clearance phenotype of macrophages infiltrating patient organs (18, 21, 22). In the case of type 2 GD hiPSC-macrophages, this phenotype was striking. We also showed that the functional response of the mutant macrophages to ERT and isofagomine reflected the clinical experience with these therapeutic agents. The generation of GD-hiPSC representative of types 1, 2, and 3 GD and the ability to differentiate them to the affected cell types with high efficiency will help elucidate the mechanisms leading to GD, and will provide a unique platform for drug discovery.
Materials and Methods
Details for the reprogramming of skin fibroblasts from patients with types 1, 2, and 3 GD, harboring N370S/N370S, L444P/RecNciI, and L444P/L444P mutations in GC, respectively, into hiPSC using the STEMCCA vector, and their characterization are described in SI Materials and Methods. The methods for differentiation of hiPSC to macrophages and neurons and their characterization by immunofluorescence analysis and flow cytometry also are described in SI Materials and Methods. The GC enzyme assay, analysis of glucosylsphingosine by HPLC-MS/MS, the erythrophagocytosis assay, and treatments with recombinant GC and the chaperone isofagomine are described in SI Materials and Methods.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Gustavo Mostoslavsky (Boston University) for providing the STEMCCA vector and Avital Shimanovich and Vivek Bose for expert technical assistance. This work was supported by Grants 2009-MSCRFII-0082-00 (to R.A.F.), 2007-MSCRFE-0110-00 (to R.A.F.), 2011-MSCRF II-0008-00 (to E.T.Z.), and 2007-MSCRF II-0379-00 (to E.T.Z.) from the Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund (MSCRF), Grant 6-FY10-334 (to R.A.F.) from the March of Dimes, and Grants 1U01HL099775 and U01HL100397 (both to E.T.Z.) from the National Institutes of Health. T.S.P. and O.A. are recipients of MSCRF postdoctoral fellowship grants.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. G.Q.D. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1207889109/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Beutler E, Grabowski GA. Gaucher Diseases. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. III. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. pp. 3635–3668. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Messner MC, Cabot MC. Glucosylceramide in humans. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;688(688):156–164. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6741-1_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jmoudiak M, Futerman AH. Gaucher disease: Pathological mechanisms and modern management. Br J Haematol. 2005;129(2):178–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sidransky E. Gaucher disease: Complexity in a “simple” disorder. Mol Genet Metab. 2004;83(1-2):6–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Goker-Alpan O, et al. Divergent phenotypes in Gaucher disease implicate the role of modifiers. J Med Genet. 2005;42(6):e37. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.028019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Takahashi K, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Park IH, et al. Disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell. 2008;134(5):877–886. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yu J, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318(5858):1917–1920. doi: 10.1126/science.1151526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dimos JT, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells generated from patients with ALS can be differentiated into motor neurons. Science. 2008;321(5893):1218–1221. doi: 10.1126/science.1158799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Agarwal S, et al. Telomere elongation in induced pluripotent stem cells from dyskeratosis congenita patients. Nature. 2010;464(7286):292–296. doi: 10.1038/nature08792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Itzhaki I, et al. Modelling the long QT syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2011;471(7337):225–229. doi: 10.1038/nature09747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lahti AL, et al. Model for long QT syndrome type 2 using human iPS cells demonstrates arrhythmogenic characteristics in cell culture. Dis Model Mech. 2012;5(2):220–230. doi: 10.1242/dmm.008409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee G, Studer L. Modelling familial dysautonomia in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366(1575):2286–2296. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Israel MA, et al. Probing sporadic and familial Alzheimer’s disease using induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2012;482(7384):216–220. doi: 10.1038/nature10821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Robinton DA, Daley GQ. The promise of induced pluripotent stem cells in research and therapy. Nature. 2012;481(7381):295–305. doi: 10.1038/nature10761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bitton A, Etzell J, Grenert JP, Wang E. Erythrophagocytosis in Gaucher cells. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128(10):1191–1192. doi: 10.5858/2004-128-1191-EIGC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Machaczka M, Klimkowska M, Regenthal S, Hägglund H. Gaucher disease with foamy transformed macrophages and erythrophagocytic activity. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011;34(1):233–235. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9241-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Polumuri SK, Toshchakov VY, Vogel SN. Role of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase in transcriptional regulation of TLR-induced IL-12 and IL-10 by Fc gamma receptor ligation in murine macrophages. J Immunol. 2007;179(1):236–246. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.1.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Naito M, Takahashi K, Hojo H. An ultrastructural and experimental study on the development of tubular structures in the lysosomes of Gaucher cells. Lab Invest. 1988;58(5):590–598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee RE, Balcerzak SP, Westerman MP. Gaucher’s disease. A morphologic study and measurements of iron metabolism. Am J Med. 1967;42(6):891–898. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(67)90070-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hibbs RG, Ferrans VJ, Cipriano PR, Tardiff KJ. A histochemical and electron microscopic study of Gaucher cells. Arch Pathol. 1970;89(2):137–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kornhaber GJ, et al. Isofagomine induced stabilization of glucocerebrosidase. ChemBioChem. 2008;9(16):2643–2649. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200800249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Khanna R, et al. The pharmacological chaperone isofagomine increases the activity of the Gaucher disease L444P mutant form of beta-glucosidase. FEBS J. 2010;277(7):1618–1638. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07588.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sun Y, et al. Ex vivo and in vivo effects of isofagomine on acid β-glucosidase variants and substrate levels in Gaucher disease. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(6):4275–4287. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.280016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hruska KS, LaMarca ME, Scott CR, Sidransky E. Gaucher disease: Mutation and polymorphism spectrum in the glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA) Hum Mutat. 2008;29(5):567–583. doi: 10.1002/humu.20676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Orvisky E, et al. Glucosylsphingosine accumulation in tissues from patients with Gaucher disease: Correlation with phenotype and genotype. Mol Genet Metab. 2002;76(4):262–270. doi: 10.1016/s1096-7192(02)00117-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brady RO. Enzyme replacement for lysosomal diseases. Annu Rev Med. 2006;57:283–296. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.57.110104.115650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Goker-Alpan O. Therapeutic approaches to bone pathology in Gaucher disease: Past, present and future. Mol Genet Metab. 2011;104(4):438–447. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2011.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yu Z, Sawkar AR, Kelly JW. Pharmacologic chaperoning as a strategy to treat Gaucher disease. FEBS J. 2007;274(19):4944–4950. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06042.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zheng W, et al. Three classes of glucocerebrosidase inhibitors identified by quantitative high-throughput screening are chaperone leads for Gaucher disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(32):13192–13197. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705637104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shen JS, Edwards NJ, Hong YB, Murray GJ. Isofagomine increases lysosomal delivery of exogenous glucocerebrosidase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;369(4):1071–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.02.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Steet RA, et al. The iminosugar isofagomine increases the activity of N370S mutant acid beta-glucosidase in Gaucher fibroblasts by several mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(37):13813–13818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605928103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Settembre C, et al. A block of autophagy in lysosomal storage disorders. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(1):119–129. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sun Y, Grabowski GA. Impaired autophagosomes and lysosomes in neuronopathic Gaucher disease. Autophagy. 2010;6(5):648–649. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.5.12047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Goker-Alpan O, et al. The spectrum of parkinsonian manifestations associated with glucocerebrosidase mutations. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(10):1353–1357. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.10.1353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mazzulli JR, et al. Gaucher disease glucocerebrosidase and α-synuclein form a bidirectional pathogenic loop in synucleinopathies. Cell. 2011;146(1):37–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.