Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1980 Aug;77(8):4697–4701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4697

Energy transfer between photosystem II units in a connected package model of the photochemical apparatus of photosynthesis

Warren L Butler 1
PMCID: PMC349913  PMID: 16592860

Abstract

A model of the photochemical apparatus of photosynthesis, presented previously in a tripartite format, is used in a bipartite format to analyze energy transfer between photosystem II units. The model is used to develop analytical expressions for the photochemical properties of chloroplasts that include a term for the probability for energy transfer between photosystem II units. In particular, a normalized plot of the fluorescence of variable yield as a function of the closure of photosystem II reaction centers permits the evaluation of the energy transfer parameter. Data from a study by Melis [Melis, A. (1978) FEBS Lett. 95, 202-206] are used to estimate that the probability for energy transfer between photosystem II units in the α component of photosystem II was approximately 0.57 when the photosystem II reaction centers were all open and 0.83 when the centers were closed. This connected package model appears to provide a better description of the system than the matrix model that was used previously.

Keywords: photochemical model

Full text

PDF
4697

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Butler W. L., Kitajima M. Energy transfer between photosystem II and photosystem I in chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Jul 8;396(1):72–85. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(75)90190-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler W. L., Kitajima M. Fluorescence quenching in photosystem II of chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Jan 31;376(1):116–125. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(75)90210-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler W. L., Strasser R. J. Does the rate of cooling affect fluorescence properties of chloroplasts at -196 degrees C? Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Nov 17;462(2):283–289. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(77)90126-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Butler W. L., Strasser R. J. Tripartite model for the photochemical apparatus of green plant photosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Aug;74(8):3382–3385. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. JOLIOT A., JOLIOT P. ETUDE CIN'ETIQUE DE LA R'EACTION PHOTOCHIMIQUE LIB'ERANT L'OXYG'ENE AU COURS DE LA PHOTOSYNTH'ESE. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1964 May 4;258:4622–4625. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kitajima M., Butler W. L. Quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and primary photochemistry in chloroplasts by dibromothymoquinone. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Jan 31;376(1):105–115. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(75)90209-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Melis A., Homann P. H. Heterogeneity of the photochemical centers in system II of chloroplasts. Photochem Photobiol. 1976 May;23(5):343–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1976.tb07259.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Melis A. Oxidation-reduction potential dependence of the two kinetic components in chloroplast system II primary photochemistry. FEBS Lett. 1978 Nov 15;95(2):202–206. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(78)80993-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Melis A., Schreiber U. The kinetic relationship between the C-550 absorbance change, the reduction of Q(delta A320) and the variable fluorescence yield change in chloroplasts at room temperature. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Jul 10;547(1):47–57. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(79)90094-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES