Abstract
TVP1022, the S-enantiomer of rasagiline (Azilect®) (N-propargyl-1R-aminoindan), exerts cyto/cardio-protective effects in a variety of experimental cardiac and neuronal models. Previous studies have demonstrated that the protective activity of TVP1022 and other propargyl derivatives involve the activation of p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. In the current study, we further investigated the molecular mechanism of action and signaling pathways of TVP1022 which may account for the cyto/cardio-protective efficacy of the drug. Using specific receptor binding and enzyme assays, we demonstrated that the imidazoline 1 and 2 binding sites (I1 & I2) are potential targets for TVP1022 (IC50 = 9.5E-08 M and IC50 = 1.4E-07 M, respectively). Western blotting analysis showed that TVP1022 (1–20 µM) dose-dependently increased the immunoreactivity of phosphorylated p42 and p44 MAPK in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells and in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVM). This effect of TVP1022 was significantly attenuated by efaroxan, a selective I1 imidazoline receptor antagonist. In addition, the cytoprotective effect of TVP1022 demonstrated in NRVM against serum deprivation-induced toxicity was markedly inhibited by efaroxan, thus suggesting the importance of I1imidazoline receptor in mediating the cardioprotective activity of the drug. Our findings suggest that the I1imidazoline receptor represents a novel site of action for the cyto/cardio-protective efficacy of TVP1022.
Introduction
Much of the morbidity and mortality resulting from cardiovascular diseases is attributable to acute ischemic events leading to myocardial infarction and death of cardiac myocytes [1], [2]. The current gold standard treatment is enabling reperfusion by using either per-cutaneous tools (e.g., stents) or by means of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Although reperfusion is a necessity, the accompanying ischemia and reperfusion injury is often devastating. Therefore, protecting the heart from I/R injury has been the focus of intense research over the past years. However, despite numerous publications and many successful preclinical experiments, thus far no effective cardioprotective drug has found its way to the clinical practice [3], [4]. We have reported previously that the compound TVP1022, which is the S-enantiomer of rasagiline (Azilect®) (N-propargyl-1R-aminoindan; a novel FDA-approved anti-Parkinsonian drug) possesses cytoprotective efficacy in a variety of cardiac and neuronal experimental models [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. We have demonstrated that although TVP1022 is ∼1000 times less potent than rasagiline as a monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor [9], [10], it exerts a prominent effective neuroprotective and anti-apoptotic activities in neuronal cell cultures in response to various neurotoxins, and in in vivo model of head injury [5], [8], [9]. Studies on structure-activity relationship revealed that the neuroprotective effect of TVP1022 is associated mainly with its propargyl moiety, and is ascribed, at least partly, to the stabilization of mitochondrial membrane potential, induction of Bcl-2 and activation of p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and protein kinase C (PKC) signaling pathways [7], [9], [10], [11].
In agreement with its cytoprotective efficacy, TVP1022 was further found to exert cardioprotective effects against doxorubicin (ananthracycline chemotherapeutic agent), and serum deprivation-induced apoptosis in cultured neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVM) [12]. It was demonstrated that pretreatment of NRVM cultures with TVP1022 or propargylamine inhibited the increase in cleaved caspase 3 levels and prevented the decline in Bcl-2/Bax ratio [12]. In addition, in both H9c2 cardiomyoblasts and NRVM, TVP1022 attenuated serum deprivation- and H2O2 -induced apoptosis. Specifically, TVP1022 preserved mitochondrial membrane potential and Bcl-2 levels, inhibited mitochondrial cytochrome c release and the increase in cleaved caspase 9 and 3 levels and enhanced the phosphorylation of PKC and glycogen synthase kinase-3β [13]. TVP1022 was also found to attenuate the functional derangements (e.g., intracellular Ca2+transients and contractions properties and intercellular coupling) caused by doxorubicin in NRVM [14]. Our recent in vivo study showed that in a rat model of I/R, TVP1022 provided prominent cardioprotection, evidenced by a reduction in the infarct size, attenuation of the decline in ventricular function and diminution of mitochondrial damage caused by I/R, thus rendering this molecule a potentially novel cardioprotective drug [13].
In the current study, we further investigated the molecular mechanism of action and signaling pathways of TVP1022 which may account for the cyto/cardio-protective efficacy of this drug. Here, using specific receptor binding and enzyme assays, our findings demonstrated that imidazoline 1 and 2 binding sites (I1 & I2) are potential targets for TVP1022. Focusing on the role of the I1imdazoline receptor in the mechanism of action of TVP1022, we deciphered the intracellular effect of the drug on the MAPK signaling pathway coupled to I1imidazoline receptor in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells and cultured NRVM. Our findings suggest that the I1imidazoline receptor represents a novel site of action for the cyto/cardio-protective efficacy of TVP1022.
Materials and Methods
Materials
TVP1022 was kindly donated by TEVA (Netanya, Israel). Efaroxan (a selective I1 imidazoline receptor antagonist), moxonidine (an I1 imidazoline receptor agonist) and β-actin antibody were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Anti-phospho-p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), anti-p42/44 MAPK and cleaved caspase 3 antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). The specific inhibitor of MAPK activation, PD98059 was obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA, USA). Tissue culture reagents were obtained from Beth-Haemek Industries (BeitHaemek, Israel).
In vitro Pharmacology: a Diversity Profile Study of TVP1022
A broad spectrum receptor binding analysis was carried out on isolated receptors and binding sites. The specific ligand binding to the receptors is defined as the difference between the total binding and the nonspecific binding determined in the presence of an excess of unlabelled ligand (Table 1). The IC50 values (concentration causing a half-maximal inhibition of control specific binding) and Hill coefficients (nH) were determined by non-linear regression analysis of the competition curves generated with mean replicate values using Hill equation curve fitting [Y = D+((A – D)/(1+(C/C50) nH)], where Y = specific binding, D = minimum specific binding, A = maximum specific binding, C = compound concentration, C50 = IC50, and nH = slope factor). This analysis was performed using SigmaPlot ® 4.0 for Windows ® (© 1997 by SPSS Inc.). The inhibition constants (Ki) were calculated using the Cheng Prusoffequation [Ki = IC50/(1+(L/KD)], where L = concentration of radioligand in the assay, and KD = affinity of the radioligand for the receptor). Reference compounds: In each experiment, the respective reference compound was tested concurrently with TVP1022 in order to assess the assay suitability and was tested at several concentrations (for EC50 or IC50 value determination), and the data were compared with historical values determined at Cerep (Poitiers, France Laboratories, Le bois l'Evêque 86600 Celle l'Evescault, France) (Table 1). The assay was rendered valid if the results of the reference compounds fell within the specifications as defined in the corresponding standard operating procedure.
Table 1. Experimental conditions of binding assays.
Assay | Ligand | Conc.(nM) | Non specific/Conc. (µM) | Inc.(min/°C) | Origin |
A1 (h) | [3H]DPCPX | 1 | DPCPX/1 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
A2A (h) | [3H]CGS 21680 | 6 | NECA/10 | 120/22 | HEK293 cells |
A3 (h) | [125I]AB-MECA | 0.15 | IB-MECA/1 | 120/22 | HEK293 cells |
α1 (non-selective) | [3H]prazosin | 0.25 | Prazosin/0.5 | 60/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
α2 (non-selective) | [3H]RX 821002 | 0.5 | (–)epinephrine/100 | 60/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
β1 (h) | [3H](–)CGP 12177 | 0.15 | alprenolol/50 | 60/22 | HEK293 cells |
β2 (h) | [3H](–)CGP 12177 | 0.2 | alprenolol/50 | 120/22 | CHO cells |
AT1 (h) | [125I][Sar1,Ile8]-AT-II | 0.05 | angiotensin-II/10 | 120/37 | HEK293 cells |
AT2 (h) | [125I]CGP 42112A | 0.04 | angiotensin-II/1 | 180/37 | CHO cells |
BZD (central) | [3H]flunitrazepam | 0.4 | diazepam/3 | 60/4 | rat cerebral cortex |
B1 (h) | [3H]desArg10-KD | 0.35 | desArg9[Leu8]-BK/10 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
B2 (h) | [3H]bradykinin | 0.2 | Bradykinin/1 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
CB1 (h) | [3H]CP 55940 | 0.5 | WIN 55212-2/10 | 120/37 | CHO cells |
CB2 (h) | [3H]WIN 55212-2 | 0.8 | WIN 55212-2/5 | 120/37 | CHO cells |
CCKA (h) (CCK1) | [125I]CCK-8s | 0.08 | CCK-8S/1 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
CCKB (h) (CCK2) | [125I]CCK-8s | 0.08 | CCK-8S/1 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
CRF1 (h) | [125I]sauvagine | 0.075 | sauvagine/0.5 | 120/22 | CHO cells |
D1 (h) | [3H]SCH 23390 | 0.3 | SCH 23390/1 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
D2S (h) | [3H]spiperone | 0.3 | (+)butaclamol/10 | 60/22 | HEK293 cells |
D3 (h) | [3H]spiperone | 0.3 | (+)butaclamol/10 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
D4.4 (h) | [3H]spiperone | 0.3 | (+)butaclamol/10 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
ETA (h) | [125I]endothelin-1 | 0.03 | endothelin-1/0.1 | 120/37 | CHO cells |
ETB (h) | [125I]endothelin-1 | 0.03 | endothelin-1/0.1 | 120/37 | CHO cells |
GABA (non-selective) | [3H]GABA | 10 | GABA/100 | 60/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
AMPA | [3H]AMPA | 8 | L-glutamate/1 | 60/4 | rat cerebral cortex |
Kainate | [3H]kainic acid | 5 | L-glutamate/1 | 60/4 | rat cerebral cortex |
NMDA | [3H]CGP 39653 | 5 | L-glutamate/100 | 60/4 | rat cerebral cortex |
H1 (h) | [3H]pyrilamine | 3 | pyrilamine/1 | 60/22 | HEK293 cells |
H2 (h) | [125I]APT | 0.075 | tiotidine/100 | 120/22 | CHO cells |
H3 (h) | [3H]Nα-Me-histamine | 1 | (R)α-Me-histamine/1 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
I1 | [3H]clonidine | 15 | rilmenidine/10 | 60/22 | bovine adrenal glands |
I2 | [3H]idazoxan | 2 | cirazoline/10 | 30/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
LTB4 (h) (BLT1) | [3H]LTB4 | 0.2 | LTB4/0.2 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
LTD4 (h) (CysLT1) | [3H]LTD4 | 0.3 | LTD4/1 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
MC4 (h) | [125I]NDP-α-MSH | 0.05 | NDP-α-MSH/1 | 120/37 | CHO cells |
M (non-selective) | [3H]QNB | 0.05 | atropine/1 | 120/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
NK1 (h) | [125I]BH-SP | 0.15 | [Sar9,Met(O2)11]-SP/1 | 60/22 | U-373MG cells |
NK2 (h) | [125I]NKA | 0.1 | [Nle10]-NKA/10 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
NK3 (h) | [3H]SR 142801 | 0.4 | SB 22200/10 | 120/22 | CHO cells |
Y (non-selective) | [3H]NPY | 0.5 | NPY/1 | 90/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
N(neuronal) (α4β2) | [3H]cytosine | 1.5 | nicotine/10 | 75/4 | rat cerebral cortex |
Opioid (non-selective) | [3H]naloxone | 1 | naloxone/1 | 40/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
ORL1 (h) (NOP) | [3H]nociceptin | 0.2 | nociceptin/1 | 60/22 | HEK293 cells |
PPARγ(h) | [3H]rosiglitazone | 10 | rosiglitazone/10 | 120/4 | E.coli |
PCP | [3H]TCP | 5 | MK 801/10 | 60/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
EP4 (h) | [3H]PGE2 | 1 | PGE2/10 | 120/22 | CHO cells |
IP (h) (PGI2) | [3H]iloprost | 10 | iloprost/10 | 60/22 | human platelets |
P2X | [3H]α,β-MeATP | 3 | α,β-MeATP/10 | 120/4 | rat urinary bladder |
P2Y | [35S]dATPαS | 10 | dATPαS/10 | 60/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
5-HT (non-selective) | [3H]serotonin | 2 | serotonin/10 | 60/37 | rat cerebral cortex |
σ (non-selective) | [3H]DTG | 8 | haloperidol/10 | 120/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
Glucocorticoid (h)(GR) | [3H]]dexamethasone | 1.5 | triamcinolone/10 | 6/4 | IM-9 cells (cytosol) |
Estrogen (h) (ER) | [3H]estradiol | 1 | 17-β-estradiol/6 | 20/4 | MCF-7 cells (cytosol) |
Progesterone (h) (PR) | [3H]R 5020 | 2 | R 5020/1 | 20/4 | MCF-7 cells (cytosol) |
Androgen (h) (AR) | [3H]methyltrienolone | 0.5 | mibolerone/1 | 24/4 | LNCaP cells (cytosol) |
TRH1 (h) | [3H]Me-TRH | 2 | TRH/10 | 120/4 | CHO cells |
V1a (h) | [3H]AVP | 0.3 | AVP/1 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
V2 (h) | [3H]AVP | 0.3 | AVP/1 | 120/22 | CHO cells |
Ca2+channel (L, DHP) | [3H](+)PN 200-110 | 0.04 | nifedipine/1 | 90/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
Ca2+channel (L,diltiazem) | [3H]diltiazem | 5 | diltiazem/10 | 120/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
Ca2+channel (L,verapamil) | [3H] (–)D 888 | 3 | D 600/10 | 120/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
K+ATP channel | [3H]glibenclamide | 0.1 | glibenclamide/1 | 60/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
K+V channel | [125I]α−dendrotoxin | 0.01 | α−dendrotoxin/50 | 60/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
SK+Cachannel | [125I]apamin | 0.007 | apamin/0.1 | 60/4 | rat cerebral cortex |
Na+channel (site 2) | [3H]batrachotoxinin | 10 | veratridine/300 | 60/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
Cl- channel (GABA-gated) | [35S]TBPS | 3 | picrotoxinin/20 | 120/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
NE transporter (h) | [3H]nisoxetine | 1 | desipramine/1 | 120/4 | CHO cells |
DA transporter (h) | [3H]BTCP | 4 | BTCP/10 | 120/4 | CHO cells |
GABA transporter | [3H]GABA | 10 | GABA/1 | 30/22 | rat cerebral cortex |
Choline transporter (h) | [3H]hemicholinium-3 | 3 | hemicholinium-3/10 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
5-HT transporter (h) | [3H]imipramine | 2 | imipramine/10 | 60/22 | CHO cells |
Analysis and expression of results are described in Materials and Methods. Conc. – concentration; Inc. – incubation.
Cell Cultures and Viability Assay
PC12 cells originated from rat pheochromocytoma purchased from ATCC, were grown to confluence in T75 flasks, containing DMEM (1000 mg/l glucose) and supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (FCS), 10% horse serum, and a mixture of 1% of penicillin/streptomycin/nystatin [11]. NRVM cultures were prepared from ventricles of 1–2 day old Sprague-Dawley rats, as previously described (ethics number Il-106-11-2007) [12]. Briefly, the ventricles of the excised hearts were dissociated with 0.1% RDB, a protease isolated from fig tree extract (Institute of Biology, Nes-Ziona,Israel), and the dispersed cells were resuspended in F-10 culture medium containing 1 mM CaCl2, 100 U/mL penicillin-streptomycin, 5% FCS, 5% donor horse serum, and 25 mg of bromodeoxyuridine (5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine, BrdU).Cell cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humid 5% CO2-95% air environment. For all experiments, cells were initially seeded in full-serum cultured media and then replaced into serum-free media containing the respective supplements.
In situ DNA fragmentation was performed by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-digoxigenin nick end labeling (TUNEL). NRVM were incubated without or with TVP1022 (20 µM) in serum free medium for 24 h. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with Triton X-100 (0.1%) and then stained with TUNEL kit (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) following by 4′-6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Confocal image stacks were captured with a Zeiss LSM-5, Axiovert 200 microscope, using LSM 5 analysis software (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Each test group was performed at least four times in 70–100 cells. Quantification of the apoptotic cells was calculated as the ratio of TUNEL-positive cells to the total number of cells in the same slide.
Western Blot Analysis
PC12 cells or NRVM cultures were resuspended in RIPA (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 1% Triton-X 100, 0.1% SDS, 0.2% sodium deoxycholate, 5 mM EDTA) containing cocktail protease inhibitors (Roche, Basel Switzerland). The lysates were precleared by centrifugation. Protein content was determined using the Bradford method (Sigma Chemical Co. St. Louis, MO, USA).Equal amounts of sample were resolved on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and blotted onto polyvinylidenedifluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Membranes were treated with blocking buffer (5% dry milk, 0.05% Tween 20 in TBS). Primary antibodies were diluted in the blocking buffer and incubated with membranes for 20 h at 4°C followed by incubation (1 h at room temperature) in dilutions of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies in the same buffer. Following antibody incubations, membranes were washed in 0.5% Tween 20 TBS. Detection was achieved using Western blotting ECL reagent (Amersham, Pharmacia, Little Chalfort Buckinghamshire, UK). Quantification of the results was accomplished by measuring the optical density of the labeled bands from the autoradiograms, using the computerized imaging program Bio-1D (VilberLourmat Biotech. Bioprof., France). The values were normalized to β-actin intensity levels.
Statistical Analysis
Each experiment was repeated 3–4 times in triplicates and data are expressed as mean±SEM. For statistical analysis one-way analysis of variance followed by Student's t test was performed and a value of p<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
The Binding Properties of TVP1022
The binding sites characterization of TVP1022 was accomplished by receptor binding and enzyme assays, as described in the Materials and Methods section. In each experiment, the respective reference compound was tested concurrently with TVP1022 in order to assess the assay suitability. TVP1022 was tested at several concentrations (1E-09-1E-05 M; for EC50 or IC50 value determination), and the data regarding the binding values of I1 and I2 imidazoline receptors were summarized and compared with historical values determined at Cerep (see Table 2). At 10 µM TVP1022, results showing an inhibition (or stimulation for assays run in basal conditions) higher than 50% are considered to represent significant effects of the test compounds. Fifty percent is the most common cutoff value for further investigation (determination of IC50 or EC50 values from concentration response curves). Results showing an inhibition (or stimulation) between 20% and 50% are indicative of weak to moderate effects (in some assays, they may be confirmed by further testing as they are within a range where more inter-experimental variability can occur). Results showing an inhibition (or stimulation) lower than 20% are not considered significant, and are mostly attributable to variability of the signal around the control level. Low to moderate negative values have no real meaning and are attributable to variability of the signal around the control level.
Table 2. Summary binding assays results for TVP1022.
Cerep Compound I.D | % Inhibition of Control Specific Binding |
A1 (h) | −13 |
A2A (h) | 10 |
A3 (h) | −37 |
α1 (non-selective) | 5 |
α2 (non-selective) | 32 |
β1 (h) | 2 |
β2 (h) | −10 |
AT1 (h) | −19 |
AT2 (h) | −8 |
BZD (central) | 6 |
B1 (h) | 9 |
B2 (h) | −1 |
CB1 (h) | −15 |
CB2 (h) | 4 |
CCKA (h) (CCK1) | −18 |
CCKB (h) (CCK2) | −3 |
CRF1 (h) | −37 |
D1 (h) | 9 |
D2S (h) | 2 |
D3 (h) | 3 |
D4.4 (h) | 4 |
ETA (h) | −107 |
ETB (h) | −3 |
GABA (non-selective) | 3 |
AMPA | 15 |
Kainate | 1 |
NMDA | 3 |
H1 (h) | 2 |
H2 (h) | 1 |
H3 (h) | −1 |
I1 | 89 |
I2 | 80 |
LTB4 (h) (BLT1) | 4 |
LTD4 (h) (CysLT1) | −9 |
MC4 (h) | 5 |
M (non-selective) | 3 |
NK1 (h) | 2 |
NK2 (h) | −5 |
NK3 (h) | −2 |
Y (non-selective) | 2 |
N(neuronal)(α-BGTX insensitive) (α4β2) | 1 |
Opioid (non-selective) | 17 |
ORL1 (h) (NOP) | 21 |
PPARγ(h) | −34 |
PCP | −6 |
EP4 (h) | 1 |
IP (h) (PGI2) | −36 |
P2X | −2 |
P2Y | −1 |
5-HT (non-selective) | 72 |
σ (non-selective) | 50 |
Glucocorticoid (h) (GR) | 1 |
Estrogen (h) (ER) | −7 |
Progesterone (h) (PR) | −10 |
Androgen (h) (AR) | 1 |
TRH1 (h) | −8 |
V1a (h) | 8 |
V2 (h) | 1 |
Ca2+channel (L, DHP site) | 19 |
Ca2+channel (L, diltiazem side) (benzothiazepines) | 7 |
Ca2+channel (L,verapamil site) (phenylalkylamines) | 3 |
K+ATP channel | 19 |
K+V channel | −6 |
SK+Cachannel | 13 |
Na+channel (site 2) | 24 |
Cl- channel (GABA-gated) | 9 |
NE transporter (h) | 9 |
DA transporter (h) | 8 |
GABA transporter | −11 |
Choline transporter (h) (CHT1) | 19 |
5-HT transporter (h) | 6 |
The binding assays results for TVP1022 (10 µM) are expressed as a percent of control specific binding [(measured specific binding/control specific binding) × 100] and as a percent inhibition of control specific binding [100−((measured specific binding/control specific binding) × 100)] obtained in the presence of TVP1022, as described in Materials and Methods.
For TVP1022 (10 µM), the percent inhibition of control specific binding was found to be 89% and 80% for I1 and I2 imidazoline receptors, respectively, and 72% for 5-HT (Table 2). The values of IC50, Ki and nH determined for TVP1022 binding to I1 and I2 are shown in Figure 1. These binding values were also indicated and compared for each reference compound (Table 3), and the results were within the accepted limit of historic average ±0.5 log units.
Table 3. The binding values of I1 and I2 imidazoline receptors of reference compounds.
nH | Ki(M) | IC50(M) | Assay/Reference compound |
0.9 | 8.4E-08 | 1.6E-07 | I1/rilmenidine |
1.7 | 1.0E-08 | 1.6E-08 | I2/idazoxan |
The IC50,Ki and nHvalues were calculated as described in Materials and Methods.
The Effect of TVP1022 on p42/44 MAPK Activation in Extracts from PC12 Cells
Previous studies showed that MAPK activation is pivotal to the protective activity of various propargyl derivatives [6], [15]. Here, we further investigated the effect of TVP1022 on MAPK signaling pathway known to be coupled to I1 imidazoline receptor in PC12 cells [16], [17], [18]. This cell line provides the predominant cellular model for investigating I1 imidazoline receptor signaling [16]. As shown in Figure 2A, TVP1022 (10 and 20 µM) dose-dependently increased the immunoreactivity of the phosphorylated p42 and p44 MAPK in PC12 cells (at 20 µM, 152.2±4%, n = 3, p<0.05, compared to control levels), whereas the total amount of MAPK was constant.
Next, we investigated the inhibitory potential of PD98059 (a non-competitive inhibitor of MEK1 phosphorylation and activation) on TVP1022-induced MAPK phosphorylation. As shown in Figure 2B, pretreatment with PD98059 (30 µM) significantly blocked the effect of TVP1022-induced increase of MAPK phosphorylation.The activation of p42/44 MAPK was determined as the ratio of the amount of the dually phosphorylated active form to total MAPK immunoreactivity. In addition, to analyze whether the effect of TVP1022 on MAPK stimulation was mediated by the I1 imidazoline receptor, we used efaroxan, a selective I1 imidazoline receptor antagonist [18]. As depicted in Figure 2B, efaroxan (10 µM) abolished the effect of TVP1022 on MAPK activation, suggesting the involvement of I1 imidazoline receptor in TVP1022-induced MAPK activation. Confirming these results [16], monoxidine (1 µM), an I1imidazoline receptor agonist, increased the phosphorylation of p42 and p44 MAPK, which was also abolished by efaroxan (Fig. 2B).
TVP1022 Increased ERK Activation in NRVM via the I1 Imidazoline Receptor
Compatible with the results showing the involvement of the I1 imidazoline receptor in TVP1022-induced activation of MAPK in PC12 cells, we further tested whether TVP1022 can activate this signaling pathway in NRVM cultures. Indeed, the phosphorylation of both MAPK isoforms was markedly increased in NRVM treated with TVP1022 (at 20 µM, 236±27%, n = 3, p<0.05, compared to control levels) (Fig. 3A). Accordingly, PD98059 (30 µM) abolished TVP1022-induced ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 3B). At both 10 and 20 µM, TVP1022-mediated increases in p42 and p44 MAPK phosphorylation were antagonized by efaroxan (Fig. 3B). These findings clearly demonstrate that the I1imidazoline receptor is involved in TVP1022-mediated p42 and p44 MAPK activation in NRVM cultures.
I1 Imidazoline Receptor Mediated TVP1022-induced Cytoprotection in NRVM
As TVP1022 was recently shown to protect NRVM against various oxidative stress-induced insults [12], [13], we tested whether the I1imidazoline receptor mediates the cytoprotective effect of TVP1022 in NRVM. The current cytoprotective studies complement our previous observations, showing that TVP1022 possesses the capacity to protect NRVM from serum deprivation-induced apoptosis [12]. In the present study, NRVM cultures were grown in serum-free medium in the absence or presence of TVP1022. As shown in Figure 4A, the pro-apoptotic effect of serum deprivation is reflected by the significant increase of apoptotic cells, compared to control, full serum cultures. In agreement with its cytoprotective efficacy, TVP1022 (20 µm) decreased the number of apoptotic cells, as was detected by TUNEL (Fig. 4A). Pre-incubation of NRVM with the efaroxan, markedly prevented TVP1022-induced cytoprotective effect (Fig. 4A). Consistent with its anti-apoptotic effect, TVP1022 attenuated the appearance of the cleaved, activated forms of caspase 3, whereas efaroxan markedly reversed TVP1022-suppressive effects on caspase 3 (Fig. 4B). Collectively, these data suggest that TVP1022 cytoprotection against serum deprivation is mediated through the I1 imidazoline receptor.
Discussion and Conclusions
Our studies have previously shown that TVP1022, the S-enantiomer of rasagiline (Azilect®) (N-propargyl-1R-aminoindan) features cyto/cardio-protective efficacy in a variety of experimental models. Using specific receptor binding and enzyme assays, the present findings demonstrated that I1 andI2 imidazoline binding sites are potential targets for TVP1022 (IC50 = 9.5E-08 M and IC50 = 1.4E-07 M, respectively). Consequently, the results of the present study also showed that TVP1022 induced a significant increase in the phosphorylated MAPK p42/44 levels in rat pheochromocytoma PC12, which are the predominant cellular model for investigating the I1 imidazoline receptor signaling pathway [16], [19]. It was previously shown by radioligand binding and by molecular approaches that PC12 cells express I1 imidazoline receptors, but lack both α2-adrenergic and I2 imidazoline receptors [20], [21]. Previous experiments on PC12 cells suggested that the I1 imidazoline receptors belong to the sphingosine -1-phosphate (S1P)- receptor family, representing a mixture of S1P1/S1P3 [21], [22]. Indeed, it was shown that S1P, the endogenous ligand for these receptors, decreased the heart rate, ventricular contraction and blood pressure in the in vivo rat model [23].
Previous studies have established a link between the I1 imidazoline receptor and the MAPK signaling pathway. Thus, activation of the I1 imidazoline receptor, which is coupled to phosphatidylcholine selective phospholipase C (PC-PLC), was shown to result in down-stream activation of MAPK p42/44 [24]. It was reported that stimulation of the I1 imidazoline receptor in PC12 cultures with the agonist moxonidine lead to PC-PLC activation [20], [25], [26]. Additionally, activation of PC-PLC by imidazoline agonists resulted in increased formation of the second messenger diacylglycerol from phosphatidylcholine and the release of phosphatidylcholine. These effects can be blocked by efaroxan, which was shown to antagonize the PL-PLC pathway associated with I1 imidazoline receptor [24]. Indeed, in the current study, we found that in PC12 cells, the effect of TVP1022 was prevented by efaroxan, indicating the involvement of I1 imidazoline receptor in TVP1022-mediated p42/44 MAPK phosphorylation in these cells.
In this study, we also explored the potential effect of TVP1022 on MAPK signaling pathway coupled to I1imidazoline receptor in cultures of NRVM. The data clearly indicate that the drug specifically stimulated p42/44 MAPK phosphorylation in NRVM. Moreover, the ability of the imidazoline I1-receptor antagonist efaroxan to block TVP1022-induced MAPK phosphorylation in NRVM further suggests that this effect of the drug is a receptor-mediated effect. While PC12 cells are deficient in α2-adrenoceptors, which renders them a suitable model for investigatingI1 imidazoline receptor signaling [20], [21], the potential contribution of α2-adrenoceptors to TVP1022 effects in NRVM cannot be ruled out.
Importantly, an additional observation of the present study is that the cytoprotective effect of TVP1022 demonstrated in NRVM against serum deprivation-induced toxicity was markedly inhibited by efaroxan, thus suggesting the importance of the I1 imidazoline receptor in mediating the cytoprotective activity of the drug. Thus, in NRVM under cytotoxic, serum deprivation conditions, efaroxan blocked the protective effect of TVP1022 determined in terms of both the reduction of apoptotic cells and decrease of caspase 3 activity, as assessed by the levels of cleaved forms of caspase 3. Indeed, the cytoprotective potency of TVP1022 shown in NRVM is in agreement with our previous studies, demonstrating that TVP1022 attenuated serum deprivation-induced apoptosis, including inhibition of the increase in cleaved caspase3 levels and prevention of the decline in Bcl2/Bax ratio [12].
Interestingly, it was recently reported that in addition to its sympathetic inhibition, the I1 imidazoline receptor agonist, monoxidine may also directly regulate molecular and functional processes in the heart, including anti-apoptotic cardiac effects and improvement of cardiac performance [27]. In summary, our present findings indicate that I1 imidazoline receptors area potential molecular target for TVP1022.It is suggested that I1 imidazoline receptors are involved in the cytoprotective beneficiary activity of TVP1022,further clarifying the mechanism of action associated with the cardioprotective effect of TVP1022.
Funding Statement
The authors have no support or funding to report.
References
- 1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, et al. (2009) Heart disease and stroke statistics–2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 119: 480–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Tiyyagura SR, Pinney SP (2006) Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: past, present, and future. Mt Sinai J Med 73: 840–851. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Downey JM, Cohen MV (2009) Why do we still not have cardioprotective drugs? Circ J 73: 1171–1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Black SC (2000) In vivo models of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury: application to drug discovery and evaluation. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 43: 153–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Huang W, Chen Y, Shohami E, Weinstock M (1999) Neuroprotective effect of rasagiline, a selective monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor, against closed head injury in the mouse. European Journal of Pharmacology 366: 127–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mandel S, Weinreb O, Amit T, Youdim MB (2005) Mechanism of neuroprotective action of the anti-Parkinson drug rasagiline and its derivatives. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 48: 379–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Naoi M, Maruyama W (2009) Functional mechanism of neuroprotection by inhibitors of type B monoamine oxidase in Parkinson's disease. Expert Rev Neurother 9: 1233–1250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Youdim MBH, Gross A, Finberg JPM (2001) Rasagiline [N-Propargyl-1R(+)-aminoindant], A selective and potent inhibitor of mitochondrial monoamine oxidase B. British Journal of Pharmacology. 132: 500–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Youdim MB, Bar Am O, Yogev-Falach M, Weinreb O, Maruyama W, et al. (2005) Rasagiline: neurodegeneration, neuroprotection, and mitochondrial permeability transition. J Neurosci Res 79: 172–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Weinreb O, Amit T, Bar-Am O, Youdim MB (2010) Rasagiline; a Novel Anti-Parkinsonian Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitor with Neuroprotective Activity. Prog Neurobiol 92: 330–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Weinreb O, Bar-Am O, Amit T, Chillag-Talmor O, Youdim MBH (2004) Neuroprotection via pro-survival protein kinase C isoforms associated with Bcl-2 family members. FASEB J 18: 1471–1473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kleiner Y, Bar-Am O, Amit T, Berdichevski A, Liani E, et al. (2008) TVP1022 and propargylamine protect neonatal rat ventricular myocytes against doxorubicin-induced and serum starvation-induced cardiotoxicity. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 52: 268–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ertracht O, Liani E, Bachner-Hinenzon N, Bar-Am O, Frolov L, et al.. (2011) The cardioprotective efficacy of TVP1022 in a rat model of ischemia/reperfusion. Br J Pharmacol doi: 10.1111/j.1476–5381.2011.01274.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 14. Berdichevski A, Meiry G, Milman F, Reiter I, Sedan O, et al. (2010) TVP1022 protects neonatal rat ventricular myocytes against doxorubicin-induced functional derangements. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 332: 413–420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bar-Am O, Amit T, Weinreb O, Youdim MB, Mandel S (2010) Propargylamine containing compounds as modulators of proteolytic cleavage of amyloid-beta protein precursor: involvement of MAPK and PKC activation. J Alzheimers Dis 21: 361–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Edwards L, Fishman D, Horowitz P, Bourbon N, Kester M, et al. (2001) The I1-imidazoline receptor in PC12 pheochromocytoma cells activates protein kinases C, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). J Neurochem 79: 931–940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Edwards L, Ernsberger P (2003) The I(1)-imidazoline receptor in PC12 pheochromocytoma cells reverses NGF-induced ERK activation and induces MKP-2 phosphatase. Brain Res 980: 71–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Dupuy L, Urosevic D, Greney H, Quaglia W, Pigini M, et al. (2004) I1 imidazoline receptor-mediated effects on apoptotic processes in PC12 cells. Cell Death Differ 11: 1049–1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Musgrave IF, Hughes RA (1999) Novel targets and techniques in imidazoline receptor research. Ann N Y Acad Sci 881: 301–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Separovic D, Kester M, Ernsberger P (1996) Coupling of I1-imidazoline receptors to diacylglyceride accumulation in PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells. Mol Pharmacol 49: 668–675. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Molderings GJ, Bonisch H, Hammermann R, Gothert M, Bruss M (2002) Noradrenaline release-inhibiting receptors on PC12 cells devoid of alpha(2(–)) and CB(1) receptors: similarities to presynaptic imidazoline and edg receptors. Neurochem Int 40: 157–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Molderings GJ, Bonisch H, Bruss M, Wolf C, von Kugelgen I, et al. (2007) S1P-receptors in PC12 and transfected HEK293 cells: molecular targets of hypotensive imidazoline I(1) receptor ligands. Neurochem Int 51: 476–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sugiyama A, Aye NN, Yatomi Y, Ozaki Y, Hashimoto K (2000) Effects of sphingosine 1-phosphate, a naturally occurring biologically active lysophospholipid, on the rat cardiovascular system. Jpn J Pharmacol 82: 338–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zhang J, El-Mas MM, Abdel-Rahman AA (2001) Imidazoline I(1) receptor-induced activation of phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C elicits mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation in PC12 cells. Eur J Pharmacol 415: 117–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Separovic D, Kester M, Haxhiu MA, Ernsberger P (1997) Activation of phosphatidylcholine-selective phospholipase C by I1-imidazoline receptors in PC12 cells and rostral ventrolateral medulla. Brain Res 749: 335–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ernsberger P (1999) The I1-imidazoline receptor and its cellular signaling pathways. Ann N Y Acad Sci 881: 35–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Stabile AM, Aceros H, Stockmeyer K, Abdel Rahman AA, Noiseux N, et al. (2011) Functional and molecular effects of imidazoline receptor activation in heart failure. Life Sci 88: 493–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Molderings GJ, Moura D, Fink K, Bonisch H, Gothert M (1993) Binding of [3H]clonidine to I1-imidazoline sites in bovine adrenal medullary membranes. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 348: 70–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Brown CM, MacKinnon AC, McGrath JC, Spedding M, Kilpatrick AT (1990) Alpha 2-adrenoceptor subtypes and imidazoline-like binding sites in the rat brain. Br J Pharmacol 99: 803–809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]