Abstract
The 129 mice are well recognized for their low fertility and it is speculated that this lack of fertility may be due to oocyte condition. In this study we investigated superovulation regimens for 129S1/SvImJ mouse strain to improve the oocyte quality and fertility rate of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Female mice were divided into four groups based on hormone and timing of injection. Group 1 received pregnant mare serum gonatotropin (PMSG) and 48 hours later human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG); using the same dose, group 2 received hCG 52 hours post PMSG and group 3, 55 hours post PMSG. Group 4 received Buserelin (gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist [GnRH]) followed 24 hours later by PMSG and then hCG 55 hours post PMSG. IVF was performed using 129S1/SvImJ oocytes and sperm; C57BL/6J sperm with 129S1/SvImJ oocytes was used as fertility control. The IVF fertility rate was 1% (Groups 1 & 2), 17% (Group 3) and 55% (Group 4) for 129 oocytes fertilized with 129 sperm. For 129 oocytes fertilized with C57BL/6J sperm, the fertility rate was 5% (Group 1) 10% (Group 2) 40% (Group 3) and 59% (Group 4).-These results suggest that extending the interval time between PMSG and hCG and giving GnRH in addition to the standard PMSG and hCG treatment can improve IVF fertility rate of 129S1/SvImJ strain mice significantly.
Keywords: In vitro fertilization, GnRH, buserelin, fertility, superovulation refinement
Assisted reproductive technology (ART)—which is a conjunction of techniques that includes embryo and gamete manipulation—is a powerful and essential tool for facilitating maintenance of laboratory animals for biomedical research and for reproductive applications in humans and domestic animals. Today, researchers studying reproductive processes, laboratories creating genetically modified animals, and repositories archiving cryopreserved embryos routinely use and often combine several ARTs to meet their needs. In mice, in vitro fertilization (IVF) is one of the most important techniques among ARTs. Because of the enormous number of mutant, transgenic, and knockout mice archived by sperm and embryo cryopreservation, IVF has become the most popular technique for producing sufficient numbers of embryos for colony expansion, rederivation, and cryopreservation. Although successful IVF is important to subsequent embryo manipulation such as cryopreservation or rederivation by embryo transfer, knowing the optimal IVF conditions becomes essential.
It is well established that in the mouse the genetic background defines the reproductive performance of strain used and influences the success of IVF.1–3 Reproductive traits such as litter size, sperm production, and hormone-induced ovulation rate differ between mouse strains.4 Furthermore, inbred mouse strains have defined reproductive parameters so distinctive as to be considered a characteristic of the strain.2,5 Inbred strains also differ in their capacity for embryo development in culture6 and in survival after embryo cryopreservation.7 The 129 mouse strain family has many sublines8; among them, the 129S1/SvImJ strain shows high incidence of spontaneously testicular teratomas9,10 and is popular for being the first line from which derivation of embryonic stem (ES) cells was established.11,12 Since then, many ES cell lines with high frequency of germline transmission have been established using 129 mice. Consequently, a large number of gene-targeted mice have been created using the 129-derived ES cells, making this mouse strain one of the most popular strains in genetic research; however, 129 mice are also known for their poor reproductive performance compared with other popular inbred strain such as C57BL/6, having smaller litter size13,14 and low IVF rate.2,3, 15,16 It was reported that the IVF using 129 oocytes and sperm (inbred cross) is lower than using sperm or eggs fertilized with other strains.3 Hino et al15 found that the fertility rate was less than 50% even when 129 females were mated with proven fertile C57BL/6J males; however, when C57BL/6J females were mated with 129 males, all females demonstrated 100% fertility. They concluded that low fertility occurred whenever 129 females were used. These findings suggest that the low fertilization rate of 129 mice may be due to oocyte problem. In our hands, although the 129 females, especially the 129S1/SvImJ strain respond very well to superovulation treatment, the production of large numbers of oocytes does not correlate with acceptable quality and fertility rate (data not shown).
Since Fowler and Edwards in 1957, exogenous gonadotropins are widely used for mice superovulation treatment. In most regimens for humans, chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) is given to preempt the endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and to induce the final stages of oocyte maturation that precede ovulation.17 Unlike the normal spontaneous ovarian cycle in which ovarian-hypothalamic-pituitary feedback systems ensure that the LH mid-cycle surge is released only when the preovulatory follicles are sufficiently mature in mice, the hCG is given following a standard regimen of 46–48 hours post eCG (PMSG) irrespective of strain. Hillier et al.18 found that prolonging the time between PMSG and hCG improved the IVF fertility rate in mice. Clinically, the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is commonly used as adjunctive therapy during ovarian stimulation. In mice, Kanter et al.19 found that an intramuscular injection of GnRH 24 hours before superovulation treatment with PMSG-hCG increased oocyte number and maturation. The primary objective of this study was to investigate different parameters of superovulation regimen in a 129 mouse strain to improve the quality of oocytes and fertility rate of IVF.
Animals, materials, and methods
Inbred wild-type mice 129S1/SvImJ and C57BL/6J were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, Maine, USA). The mice were maintained in facilities accredited by the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC). Animal housing included a controlled light and dark cycle (14–10 hours, lights on at 6a.m. off at 8 p.m.), ad libitum food, Purina 5058 irradiated high-fat rodent diet, ultra-filtered water, ventilated caging systems, and standardized environmental enrichment system. Male mice were housed individually for at least 5 days prior to sperm collection. All experiments were conducted under the approval of the NIAID (NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA) Institutional Animal Care and User Committee (IACUC).
In vitro fertilization (IVF)
IVF was performed using the method described by Vasudevan et al.1 Research Vitro Fert (K-RVFE-50; Cook Medical, Inc. USA) was used for sperm incubation, IVF, and culture of zygotes. Sperm were collected from the caudae epididymides of 3- to 5-months-old male mice as described by Sztein et al.3and capacitated for 60 minutes at 37°C under 5% CO2 in the incubator. Sperm motility and concentration were confirmed by visual observation at the edge of the drop under a stereo dissecting microscope. Three to five 2-months-old 129S1/SvImJ female mice were assigned to four groups: superovulated (group 1), superovulated with different timings of hCG (groups 2 and 3), and superovulated with GnRH pretreatment (group 4). Oocytes from 129S1/SvImJ females were fertilized by fresh sperm from 129S1/SvImJ and C57BL/6J males. Female mice were superovulated with 0.1cc (5 IU in saline) of PMSG (Sigma, St.�Louis, MO, USA) intraperitoneally between 11a.m. and 3 p.m. At 48, 52, and 55 hours post PMSG, the mice were treated with 0.1cc (5 IU) of hCG (Sigma) intraperitoneally between 3 p.m. and 6 p.m. Donor females were housed in the animal facility for 7 to 10 days before starting the hormone treatment. For the GnRH pretreated group, females were treated with 0.1cc of GnRH (20 mg/Kg Buserelin, i.p.) 24 hours before superovulation ampullae and subsequently used for IVF. After sperm incubation (45 minutes), 10 µL of the fresh sperm suspension was added to a 250-µL drop of IVF medium. Thirteen to 14 hours post hCG treatment the females were euthanized and the isolated oocyte complexes were transferred to the sperm drop and incubated at 37°C for 5 hours. The eggs were then washed and cultured overnight in IVF medium under the same conditions. The following day, the two-cell embryos were scored to evaluate the fertility and eventually prepared for either transfer to recipient females or for cryopreservation. Oocytes from the superovulated and GnRH treated superovulated females were pooled for each IVF; the experiment was done on three separate days.
Embryo transfer
To assess whether embryos produced by IVF using buserelin treated females support development to term, 14 embryos from buserelin treated and control group were transferred to pseudopregnant mothers. Female CD1 mice (Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. Wilmington, MA, USA), 9 to 13 weeks of age were mated with vasectomized CD1 males (Harlan Laboratories, Inc., Frederick, MD, USA) to induce pseudopregnancy. The following morning, females with vaginal plugs were used as embryo transfer recipients. Embryos (14) were surgically transferred into the left oviduct of each female, as described by Nagy et al.20, and the number of pups born was counted.
Statistical analysis
Fertility was considered as the percentage of two cell stage embryos scored 24 hours after insemination. For statistical analysis, percentages were transformed into arcsine values and then evaluated by a paired Student’s t-test (one tailed). Differences were considered significant when a P value of < 0.05 was obtained. Error bars on figures are SEM. Data were analyzed using the GraphPad Prism version 5.0 computer program (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Results
Results of the IVF procedures are summarized in the following tables and figure. Fertility was scored at the two-cell stage and calculated by dividing the number of two-cell embryos by the total number of oocytes exposed in the IVF dish. The fertility rate was high for group 3 (hCG given 55 hours post PMSG) when compared with groups 1 and 2 as shown in Table 1.The fertility rate was significantly higher for females treated with buserelin compared with females not treated with buserelin (shown in Table 2). The fertility rate for groups 1 and 2 vs. group 3 was 1 ± 1% vs. 17 ± 12% for 129X129 and 5 ± 4%, 10% vs. 40 ± 22% for 129XB6 (Table 1). The percentage of eggs fertilized for buserelin-treated and buserelin untreated was 55 ± 16% vs. 28 ± 10% for 129X129 cross and 59 ± 20% vs. 32 ± 8% for 129XB6 cross as shown in Table 2 and in Figure 1.
Table 1.
In vitro fertilization of mouse oocytes: effect of giving hCG at different timings to induce ovulation
| IVF (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 |
| 129 × 129a | 1% ± 1 (2/171) | 1% (1/85) | 17% ± 12 (34/193) |
| 129 × B6b | 5% ± 4 (9/160) | 10% (11/108) | 40% ± 22 (75/155) |
Group 1 – hCG was given 48 hrs post PMSG; Group 2 – hCG was given 52 hrs post PMSG; Group 3 – hCG was given 55hrs post PMSG.
- 129 oocytes are fertilized by 129 sperm
– 129 oocytes are fertilized by B6 sperm
Table 2.
Effect of buserelin treatment on IVF
| No Buserelin | Buserelin | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVF Cross | No. oocytes | No. 2-cell | IVF% | No.oocytes | No. 2 cell | IVF% |
| 129 × 129 | 163 | 47 | 28 ± 10 | 159 | 89 | 55 ± 16a |
| 129 × B6 | 107 | 35 | 32 ± 8 | 167 | 101 | 59 ± 20b |
The data shown in the table represents cumulative results of all IVF experiments done on three different days. Superscript letter represents significant difference in fertility rate between no Buserelin and Buserelin treated groups.
Figure 1.
In vitro fertilization of 129S1/SvImJ female mice treated with Buserelin before superovulation. 129S1/SvImJ oocytes were fertilized by 129S1/SvImJ and C57BL/6 sperm.
Newborn mice derived from buserelin-treated and buserelin untreated groups
Since the rational of the study was to improve the oocyte quality for in-vitro fertilization, it was important to assess that Buserelin treatment doesn’t affect the embryos development to term. Fourteen embryos from each group were transferred to pseudopregnant CD1 females, and the number of pups born was counted. There was no marked difference between the two groups. The number of offspring born for control group was 10 out of 14 and for Buserelin-treated females was 18 out of 28.
Discussion
The results of this study show that the IVF fertility rate of 129S1/SvImJ strain can be improved significantly by extending the time of hCG injection after PMSG and by treating the females with GnRH before superovulation. The quality of the oocyte was clearly improved by the action of Buserelin demonstrated by the increase in the fertility rate and as expected, the embryo development and birth rate was not altered by the Buserelin.
Archiving mouse strains by embryo cryopreservation has great potential, because it preserves the whole genome and it is simple, rapid, and inexpensive if we are able to generate embryos in vitro. The use of IVF to produce embryos for embryo banking and/or rederivation can shorten the time required to complete the process; however, success in producing those embryos needed for cryopreservation is influenced by the genetic background and reproductive performance of the mouse strain used.1, 21 Although the 129 mouse strain has become popular because its embryos were used to derive many ES cell lines, all of them resulting in high frequency germline transmission, they also are popular for their poor reproductive performance, which also affects IVF fertility rate.15 Hino et al. found that the fertility rate was less than 50% even when 129 females were mated with C57BL/6J males with normal fertility. These findings suggest that the low fertilization rate of 129 mice may be due to an oocyte problem. In general, 129 females from all sub-strains respond well to standard superovulation treatment and large numbers of oocytes are obtained, but this occurrence does not correlate with acceptable quality and fertility of the oocytes produced. The rational of this study was to improve the quality of oocytes of 129S1/SvImJ mice, which will be reflected in the IVF fertility rate. For that, we investigated different hormonal treatment parameters and combinations to optimize the quality of oocytes obtained from superovulated 129 mice.
The results of the study highlights one of the options to improve the IVF fertility rate of 129 strain by extending the interval time between PMSG and hCG injection up to 55 hours and by treating the females with 20 mg/Kg of Buserelin 24 hours prior to the standard superovulation treatment. The increase in IVF fertility rate showed by the greater number of 2 cell-embryos obtained from the treated females may be due to the effect on oocyte maturation induced by the GnRH with its activity especially on the ovary.22 Recent studies have shown that at least in mice, rats, and rabbits—GnRH and its analogs exert a direct effect on gonadal function, affecting or influencing oocyte maturation both in vivo and in vitro.22,23 It has been suggested that GnRH induces oocyte maturation via activation of specific GnRH receptors on granulosa cells24, 25 and that exposure to GnRH stimulates prostaglandin (PG) E2 and PGF2α synthesis in preovulatory follicles.26 Also, the increasing concentration of PGs plays an important role in oocyte maturation.27
The other possible reason for the increase in fertility rate could be the increase in the interval time between PMSG and hCG. It has been shown that moderate decreases in follicular maturation time before inducing ovulation with hCG caused consistent and marked reduction in oocyte fertility.18 Hillier et al. in the same study showed that by increasing the interval time in superovulation treatment between the PMSG-hCG injections up to 50 hours resulted in an increase in the oocyte fertility rate in vitro. A similar observation was made in hamsters, where the extension of the hCG time interval from 52 to 76 hours resulted in an increased fertilization rate.28
In conclusion, the supplement of a GnRH treatment 24 hours before superovulation and extending the interval to 55 hours between injections of PMSG and hCG result in an improvement of IVF fertility rate in the 129S1/SvImJ mouse strain, and as expected in this study, the embryo development was not affected by the treatment, demonstrated by the normal number of pups born after embryo transfer. The results of this study show that, improving the fertility rate of this "difficult strain" make it possible to obtain larger number of viable embryos for embryo banking or experimental studies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. We thank Brenda Rae Marshall, DPSS, NIAID, for editing.
Because the authors are government employees and this is a government work, the work is in the public domain in the United States. Notwithstanding any other agreements, the NIH reserves the right to provide the work to PubMedCentral for display and use by the public, and PubMedCentral may tag or modify the work consistent with its customary practices. You can establish rights outside of the U.S. subject to a government use license.
REFERENCES
- 1.Vasudevan K, Raber J, Sztein JM. Fertility comparison between wild type and transgenic mice by in vitro fertilization. Transgenic Res. 2010;19:587–594. doi: 10.1007/s11248-009-9336-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Byers SL, Payson SJ, Taft RA. Performance of ten inbred mouse strains following assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) Theriogenology. 2006;65:1716–1726. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sztein JM, Farley JS, Mobraaten LE. In vitro fertilization with cryopreserved inbred mouse sperm. Biol Reprod. 2000;63:1774–1780. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod63.6.1774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Spearow JL, Barkley M. Genetic control of hormone induced ovulation rate in mice. Biol Reprod. 1999;61:851–856. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod61.4.851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Silver LM. Mouse genetics: concept and applications. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dandekar PV, Glass RH. Development of mouse embryos in vitro is affected by strain and culture medium. Gamete Res. 1987;17:279–285. doi: 10.1002/mrd.1120170402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pomp D, Eisen EJ. Genetic control of survival of frozen mouse embryos. Biol Reprod. 1990;42:775–786. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod42.5.775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Simpson EM, Linder CC, Sargent EE, Davisson MT, Mobraaten LE, Sharp JJ. Genetic variation among 129 substrains and its importance for targeted mutagenesis in mice. Nat Genet. 1997;16:19–27. doi: 10.1038/ng0597-19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Matin A. What leads from dead-end? Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:1317–1322. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-6433-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stevens LC. The biology of teratomas. Adv Morphol. 1967;6:1–31. doi: 10.1016/b978-1-4831-9953-5.50005-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature. 1981;292:154–156. doi: 10.1038/292154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1981;78:7634–7638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Festing MFW. Inbred strains in biomedical research. New York: Oxford University Press; 1979. pp. 137–266. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nagasawa H, Miyamoto M, Fujimoto M. Reproductivity in inbred strains of mice and project for their efficient production. Jikken Dobutsu. 1973;22:119–126. doi: 10.1538/expanim1957.22.2_119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hino T, Oda K, Nakamura K, Toyoda Y, Yokoyamma M. Low fertility in vivo resulting from female factors causes small litter size in 129 inbred mice. Reprod Med Biol. 2009;8:157–161. doi: 10.1007/s12522-009-0024-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kawai Y, Hata T, Suzuki O, Matsuda J. The relationship between sperm morphology and in vitro fertilization ability in mice. J Reprod Dev. 2006;52:561–568. doi: 10.1262/jrd.18023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Edwards RG, Steptoe PC. Induction of follicular growth, ovulation and leutinization in the human ovary. J Reprod Fertile. 1975;22(suppl):121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hillier SG, Siddiquey AKS, Winston RML. Fertilization in vitro of cumulus enclosed mouse oocytes: effect of timing of the ovulatory HCG injection. Int J Fertil. 1985;30:34–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kanter M, Yildiz C, Meral I, Koc A, Tasal I. Effects of GnRH agonist on oocyte number and maturation in mice superovulated with eCG and hCG. Theriogenology. 2004;61:393–398. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(03)00222-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nagy A, Gersenstein M, Vintersten K, Behringer R. Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual. 3rd ed. Vol. 175. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2003. pp. 263–267.pp. 571 [Google Scholar]
- 21.Parkening TA, Chang MC. Strain differences in the in vitro fertilizing capacity of mouse spermatozoa as tested in various media. Biol Reprod. 1976;15:647–653. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod15.5.647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang BC, Uemura T, Minaguchi H. Effects of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist on oocyte maturation, fertilization and embryonal development in mice. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:728–732. doi: 10.1007/BF02212901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yoshimura Y, Nakamura Y, Ando M, Shiokawa S, Koyama N, Nanno T. Direct effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists on the rabbit ovarian follicle. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:1091–1097. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55029-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dekel N, Lewysohn O, Ayalon D, Hazum E. Receptors for gonadotropin releasing hormone are present in rat oocytes. Endocrinology. 1988;123:1205–1207. doi: 10.1210/endo-123-2-1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Koves K, Gottschall PE, Arimura A. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone binding sites in ovaries of normal cycling and persistent-estrus rats. Biol Reprod. 1989;41:505–511. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod41.3.505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wong WY, Richards JS. Induction of prostaglandin H synthase in rat preovulatory follicles by gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Endocrinology. 1992;130:3512–3521. doi: 10.1210/endo.130.6.1317786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Calder MD, Caveney AN, Westhusin ME, Watson AJ. Cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandin E2(PGE2) receptor messenger RNAs are affected by bovine oocyte maturation time and cumulus-oocyte complex quality, and PGE2 induces moderate expansion of the bovine cumulus in vitro. Biol Reprod. 2001;65:135–140. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod65.1.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mizoguchi H, Dukelow WR. Effect of timing of HCG injection on fertilization in superovulated hamsters. Biol Reprod. 1980;23:237–241. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod23.1.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

