Background: The calcium-binding protein DREAM/KChIP3 binds DNA and other proteins to regulate neuronal function.
Results: DREAM/KChIP3 binds the EF-hand protein, calmodulin, in the presence but not in the absence of calcium. Calcium-bound DREAM/KChIP3 enhances calmodulin-dependent calcineurin activity.
Conclusion: DREAM/KChIP3 binds and regulates calmodulin activity.
Significance: DREAM/KChIP3 heterodimerizes with the EF-hand protein, calmodulin, and regulates calmodulin activation of calcineurin.
Keywords: Calcineurin, Calcium, Calmodulin, Fluorescence, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Calsenilin, DREAM, EF-hand, KChIP3, Neuronal Calcium Sensor Proteins
Abstract
Downstream regulatory element antagonistic modulator (DREAM/KChIP3), a neuronal EF-hand protein, modulates pain, potassium channel activity, and binds presenilin 1. Using affinity capture of neuronal proteins by immobilized DREAM/KChIP3 in the presence and absence of calcium (Ca2+) followed by mass spectroscopic identification of interacting proteins, we demonstrate that in the presence of Ca2+, DREAM/KChIP3 interacts with the EF-hand protein, calmodulin (CaM). The interaction of DREAM/KChIP3 with CaM does not occur in the absence of Ca2+. In the absence of Ca2+, DREAM/KChIP3 binds the EF-hand protein, calcineurin subunit-B. Ca2+-bound DREAM/KChIP3 binds CaM with a dissociation constant of ∼3 μm as assessed by changes in DREAM/KChIP3 intrinsic protein fluorescence in the presence of CaM. Two-dimensional 1H,15N heteronuclear single quantum coherence spectra reveal changes in chemical shifts and line broadening upon the addition of CaM to 15N DREAM/KChIP3. The amino-terminal portion of DREAM/KChIP3 is required for its binding to CaM because a construct of DREAM/KChIP3 lacking the first 94 amino-terminal residues fails to bind CaM as assessed by fluorescence spectroscopy. The addition of Ca2+-bound DREAM/KChIP3 increases the activation of calcineurin (CN) by calcium CaM. A DREAM/KChIP3 mutant incapable of binding Ca2+ also stimulates calmodulin-dependent CN activity. The shortened form of DREAM/KChIP3 lacking the NH2-terminal amino acids fails to activate CN in the presence of calcium CaM. Our data demonstrate the interaction of DREAM/KChIP3 with the important EF-hand protein, CaM, and show that the interaction alters CN activity.
Introduction
Downstream regulatory element antagonistic modulator (DREAM2/Calsenilin/KChIP3), a member of the neuronal calcium sensor (NCS) family of proteins, is a 256-amino acid protein that binds calcium (Ca2+) with varying affinity in four EF-hands and is highly expressed in neuronal cells of the hippocampus, cerebellum, and thalamic relay centers of the brain (1–7). DREAM/KChIP3 is a multifunctional protein that binds DNA and several proteins, thereby regulating prodynorphin and c-fos gene expression and multiple cellular functions, respectively (1–5, 8–11). DREAM/KChIP3 modulates endogenous opioid production by binding to the downstream regulatory element (DRE) of the prodynorphin (pdyn) and c-fos genes to repress their transcription (1). The binding of Ca2+ to DREAM/KChIP3 dissociates DREAM/KChIP3 from the DRE of pdyn and c-fos, thereby increasing the transcription of these genes. Dream−/− mice display reduced responses to acute thermal, mechanical, and visceral pain and improved contextual fear conditioning (12, 13). DREAM/KChIP3 binds to the carboxyl-terminal portion of presenilin to regulate γ-secretase function (4). Dream−/− mice have ∼50% less Aβ40 and Aβ42 in the cerebellum, suggesting a potential affect on γ-secretase cleavage by DREAM/KChIP3 (14). DREAM/KChIP3 also binds to the amino-terminal portion of Ca2+-activated Kv4 potassium channels, which are highly expressed in the brain and heart and contribute to the transient, voltage-dependent potassium ion currents (A-currents) in the nervous system and the transient outward currents in the heart (15, 16). DREAM also modulates signaling of the N-methyl-d-aspartate membrane receptor (17).
Not all functions of DREAM/KChIP3 are readily explained by known interactions with DNA and proteins. To gain further insights into how DREAM/KChIP3 functions in cells, we investigated whether DREAM/KChIP3 interacts with other previously unidentified neuronal proteins and regulates their activity in a Ca2+-dependent manner. We employed a DREAM/KChIP3 affinity capture method followed by mass spectrometric identification of bound proteins to identify a number of significant Ca2+-dependent and Ca2+-independent DREAM/KChIP3 heterologous protein interactions. In particular, we found that DREAM/KChIP3 interacted with the EF-hand, CaM, and other NCS proteins in a Ca2+-dependent manner. We confirmed the interaction of DREAM/KChIP3 with CaM with in vitro experiments and demonstrated the functional relevance of the interaction by examining the effect of DREAM/KChIP3 on Ca2+-CaM stimulation of CN.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of EF-hand Mut-1234-DREAM/KChIP3 Expression Vector
The full-length DREAM-KChIP3 cDNA in pGEX 6P1 (6) and the QuikChange Lightning Multi-site Mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) were used for mutagenesis of nucleotide residues encoding amino acids in EF-hand 1 (E103A,D110A), EF-hand 2 (D139A,D141A), EF-hand 3 (D175A,N177A), and EF-hand 4 (D223A,N225A). As noted, acidic residues (Glu/Asp) and a basic residue (Asn) were mutated to alanine residues. The chimeric mutant pGEX 6P1-EF-hand Mut-1234-DREAM/KChIP3 plasmid was used to transform Escherichia coli NEBTurbo cells. The plasmid was amplified and sequenced to verify the presence of mutations.
Protein Preparation and Purification
Full-length (FL) DREAM/KChIP3 (amino acids 1–256), a truncated DREAM/KChIP3 variant, short full-length (sFL)-DREAM/KChIP3 (EF-hands 1–4, amino acids 95–256), and the calcium-insensitive mutant EF-hand Mut-1234-DREAM/KChIP3 were expressed and purified as previously described (6). Briefly, the proteins were expressed as NH2-terminal glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion products containing an intervening PreScission protease site by transforming E. coli BL21 cells with chimeric DREAM/KChIP3-pGEX-6P-1 plasmids (GE Healthcare). Unless stated otherwise, GST was proteolytically cleaved from the expressed chimeric proteins using PreScission protease (GE Healthcare) leaving five residues (GPLGS) as an NH2-terminal addition to the DREAM/KChIP3 sequence. Proteins were further purified on an HR 200 Superdex preparatory column with an AKTA fast performance liquid chromatography system (GE Healthcare). Proteolytically cleaved GST was saved and used in control experiments during pulldown assays.
Human CaM was prepared as previously described (18). Briefly, human CaM cDNA was subcloned into a pET-15b expression vector (GE Healthcare). CaM was overexpressed in BL21(DE3) E. coli cells. CaM was purified by incubating the clarified cell lysate with 5 mm CaCl2 at 52 °C for 5 min. The precipitated protein formed during the high temperature incubation was removed by centrifugation at 4000 × g for 10 min. The soluble protein was filter-sterilized using a 0.45 μm filter and applied to a phenyl-Sepharose column equilibrated with 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 2 mm CaCl2, 150 mm NaCl, and 2 mm dithiothreitol (DTT). The column was washed with 200 column volumes of buffer. CaM was eluted with 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mm EGTA, 10 mm EDTA, 150 mm NaCl, and 2 mm DTT. CaM was further purified by gel filtration chromatography using a HR 200 Superdex preparatory grade column at a flow rate of 0.25 ml/min in 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mm EDTA, 150 mm NaCl, and 2 mm DTT.
Size Exclusion Chromatography and Analytical Ultracentrifugation
Size exclusion chromatography experiments of 10 μm FL-DREAM/KChIP3 were conducted at a flow rate of 0.25 ml/min in either 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mm NaCl, 500 mm EDTA, 2 mm DTT, or 50 mm CaCl2. Sample loading volume was 200 μl. Standards for size exclusion chromatography runs were purchased from Sigma. Analytical ultracentrifugation experiments were conducted at 4 °C at 15,000 rpm and repeated at 12,000 rpm with an ANTi60 rotor and a Beckman Optima XL-I centrifuge (Beckman Coulter Instruments, Indianapolis, IN) equipped with an ultraviolet/interface detection system as described elsewhere (19–21). Centrifugation was continued until equilibrium was achieved as determined by the super-imposition of sequential scans obtained at 4-h intervals. Samples were analyzed in duplicate within the same run. Data were fit to single species and/or self-association models with SEDPHAT (22). Buffer conditions were 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mm NaCl, 2 mm DTT, 1.5 mm EDTA, or 500 μm Ca2+ as indicated.
DREAM/KChIP3 Affinity Capture Assay
Sprague-Dawley Rats fed Lab Diet 5053 were euthanized at age 2 months. Two brains without spinal cord and brain stem weighing 1.67 and 1.63 g were rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline and stored for future use. The brains were subsequently thawed and placed in 10-ml buffer containing 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mm NaCl, 2 mm DTT, 1 mini complete, EDTA-free, protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Diagnostics) and either 2 mm EDTA (buffer A) or 5 mm CaCl2 (buffer B), respectively. Rat brains were homogenized with three, 60-s pulses of a Polytron (Brinkman Instruments) with a power setting of 8. Brain homogenate was then clarified by centrifugation at 18,000 × g for 30 min. The soluble supernatant fractions were collected, and total protein content was quantitated by Bradford analysis.
Four columns were prepared by incubating GST-DREAM/KChIP3 or GST for 2 h at 4 °C with glutathione-Sepharose resin (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). Total protein bound to the resin was calculated by Bradford analysis (Bio-Rad) of the protein content in solution before binding to the glutathione resin and comparing this to the flow-through after resin incubation. Two columns containing 250 μl of glutathione-Sepharose resin saturated with purified GST-DREAM/KChIP3 and two columns containing 250 μl of glutathione-Sepharose resin saturated with purified GST were prepared. All four columns were treated as noted in the steps that follow. One column of GST-DREAM/KChIP3 and one control column of GST were paired and equilibrated with 20 column volumes of buffer A, whereas the other two remaining columns were equilibrated with 20 column volumes of buffer B. Clarified rat brain homogenate in either buffer A or buffer B was divided into two equivalent volumes (4.5 ml), and 1.5 ml of each was incubated for 15 min with GST-DREAM/KChIP3 or GST equilibrated with the respective buffers. The remaining 3 ml of rat brain homogenate was allowed to flow through each respective column. All resins were washed with 200 column volumes of buffer A or buffer B without protease inhibitors. The resin was then washed with 10 column volumes of the previous buffer containing 2 m NaCl. Residual proteins bound to the column were eluted with 500 μl of buffer A and buffer B containing 50 mm reduced glutathione. Fractions were kept separate and run on an SDS-PAGE gel. Gels were stained with 0.02% PhastGel Blue R in 30% methanol and 10% acetic acid.
Mass Spectrometric Identification of Interacting Proteins
Gel bands and the interband regions were grouped and excised according to Fig. 2A. Gel bands were destained in 50% acetonitrile, 50 mm Tris, pH 8.1. Proteins within the bands were reduced with 50 mm tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine, 50 mm Tris, pH 8.1, at 55 °C for 40 min and alkylated with 40 mm iodoacetamide, 50 mm Tris, pH 8.1, at 22 °C for 40 min. Proteins were digested in situ with 30 μl (0.005 μg/μl) of trypsin (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) in 20 mm Tris, pH 8.1, 0.0002% Zwittergent 3-16 at 37 °C for 4–16 h followed by peptide extraction with 20 μl of 2% trifluoroacetic acid. Pooled extracts were concentrated to less than 5 μl and brought up in 0.2% trifluoroacetic acid for protein identification by nano-flow liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry using an Eksigent nanoLC-2D HPLC system (Eksigent, Dublin, CA) and a Thermo Finnigan LTQ Orbitrap Hybrid Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). Digested peptide mixtures were loaded onto a 250-nl OPTI-PAK trap (Optimize Technologies, Oregon City, OR) packed with a C8 solid phase (Michrom Bioresources, Auburn, CA). Chromatography was performed using 0.2% formic acid using A solvent (98% water, 2% acetonitrile) and B solvent (80% acetonitrile and 10% isopropyl alcohol, 10% water) with a gradient of B from a 5 to 50% over 60 min at flow rate of 325 nl/min through a PicoFrit (New Objective, Woburn, MA) 75 × 200-mm column (Michrom Magic C18, 3 μm). The LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer was set to perform a Fourier transform full scan from 360 to 1400 m/z with resolution set to 60,000 (at 400 m/z) followed by linear ion trap MS/MS scans on the top five ions. Dynamic exclusion was set to 1, and selected ions were placed on an exclusion list for 30 s. The lock-mass option was enabled for the Fourier transform full scans using the ambient air polydimethyl-cyclosiloxane ion of m/z = 445.120024 or a common phthalate ion m/z = 391.284286 for real time internal calibration. Tandem mass spectra were extracted by BioWorks version 3.2. All MS/MS samples were analyzed using Mascot (Matrix Science, London, UK; Version 2.2.04), Sequest (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, CA; Version 27, Rev. 12), and X! Tandem (Version 2006.09.15.3) searched against the Swiss-Prot database release 2012-01. The search was left open to all species.
FIGURE 2.
A, shown is a SDS-PAGE analysis of eluate from each respective column. Oblong rectangles represent the sections that were dissected and then analyzed by LC/MS after tryptic digestion. The ladder is displayed in the left-most lane followed by the elutions from each respective experiment, as labeled above each lane. M.W., molecular mass. B, of the 22 proteins that were found to interact exclusively with Ca2+-bound DREAM/KChIP3, 5 belonged to EF-hand proteins. For the bar graphs, light gray bars represent EF-hand proteins that interact with Ca2+-DREAM/KChIP3, and the dark gray bar represents the EF-hand protein that interacts with apoDREAM/KChIP3. Only interactions determined to be significant are displayed. * denotes the gel band corresponding to ∼17 kDa and displays the contrasting band intensities for that region.
Identification of Significant Proteins Interacting with DREAM/KChIP3
Scaffold (Version Scaffold_2_00_06, Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR) was used to validate MS/MS-based peptide and protein identification. All identified proteins were first sorted and accepted if the number of unique peptides found during MS/MS analysis was greater that 2 and if the protein identification probability was greater than 98.8% as specified by the Peptide Prophet algorithm. Of these, proteins were eliminated if they were found in the eluates of the GST-DREAM/KChIP3 column and the GST column for each paired condition.
Fluorescence Measurements
Tryptophan fluorescence measurements were acquired on FluoroLog-3 spectrofluorometer (Horiba Scientific, Dallas, TX) with an excitation wavelength of 295 nm and detection wavelength between 305 and 400 nm. Excitation and emission slit widths were set to 2.5 nm, whereas step size and integration time were set to 1 nm and 1 nm/s, respectively. Equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) measurements were acquired by monitoring the tryptophan fluorescence of 5 μm DREAM/KChIP3 in 25 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 50 mm NaCl, 100 μm CaCl2 at 4 °C as a function of the CaM concentration. Calcium titration experiments were performed by monitoring tryptophan fluorescence of 10 μm DREAM/KChIP3 in 25 mm HEPES, pH 7.5, 50 mm NaCl, 2 mm EGTA with or without 10 μm CaM. Calcium was titrated in, and the total free Ca2+ in solution was estimated by the Max Chelator Ca-EGTA calculator v1.2 using NIST critical stability constants (Maxchelator).
NMR Spectroscopy of DREAM/KChIP3 and DREAM/KChIP3-CaM Complex
FL DREAM/KChIP3 were expressed in minimal media, supplemented with 15NH4Cl salts, and purified as previously described (6). NMR experiments were conducted on a Bruker Avance 700 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a triple resonance cryogenic probe. Two-dimensional 1H,15N heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) spectra of 15N-labeled DREAM/KChIP3 were recorded in the presence and absence of CaM. Samples contained 100 μm 15N-labeled DREAM/KChIP3 with 2 mm CaCl2, 10 mm Tris-HCl, 50 mm NaCl, 10% D2O, 10 mm DTT at pH 7.0. 50 μm unlabeled CaM was added to a second identically prepared sample.
Calcium Binding to DREAM Protein Constructs
Calcium binding to full-length DREAM/KChIP3 and mutant EF-hand Mut1234-DREAM/KChIP3 was assessed by a blotting procedure. An Immun-Blot PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad) was used in a MINIFOLD II (Schleicher & Schuell) assembled according to the manufacturer's instructions. 60 μl of 10, 20, and 40 μg of DREAM/KChIP3 and EFMut1234-DREAM/KChIP3 in 25 mm Tris-HCl, 150 mm NaCl, pH 7.5, were incubated with 2.2 × 107 cpm of 45CaCl2 (specific activity 14.03 mCi/mg, PerkinElmer Life Sciences) for 1 h at 4 °C. Half of each solution of DREAM/KChIP3 and EFMut1234-DREAM/KChIP3 was applied to separate wells. After the protein was adsorbed to the PVDF membrane, the membrane was cut in half. Each membrane half was incubated for 15 min in a 25 mm Tris-HCl, 150 mm NaCl, pH 7.5, buffered solution containing 1 μCi/ml 45Ca2+ with or without 10 mm CaCl2. Both membranes were washed in buffer for 5 s, dried, and exposed to a phosphor screen for 3 h. The image was captured using STORM 840 phosphorimaging (GE HealthCare) set to a pixel resolution of 50 microns. Images were processed using the ImageJ program (23).
Calcineurin Activity Assay
A colorimetric CN phosphatase assay kit was purchased from ENZO (ENZO Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY). Reactions were carried out in the following buffer: 10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mm NaCl, 5 mm MgCl2, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, 4 μm CaCl2. The final reaction was 25 μl and contained 20 units of CN, 10 pm CaM, 150 mm RII phosphopeptide substrate (DLDVPIPGRFDRRVpSVAAE) and varying concentrations of DREAM/KChIP3 or sFL-DREAM/KChIP3. The reactions were performed in a half-volume 96-microwell plate and were conducted in parallel with six repeats. Reactions were initiated by the addition of substrate to each well. Plates were mixed by vortexing for 15 s at a speed setting of 4 and then covered and incubated at 30 °C for 45 min. Reactions were quenched by the addition of 100 μl of BIOMOL GREEN reagent (ENZO scientific), vortexed for 15 s, and incubated for 20 min at 21 °C. The absorbance at 620 nm was recorded using the SpectraMax M2 (Molecular Devices) microplate reader. For the assay conducted using EF-hand 1234Mut-DREAM/KChIP3, all reaction volumes were doubled along with the units of CN used, and the assay was performed in a full-area, clear bottom 96-well plate. All values were compared with the experimentally determined standard phosphate curve as detailed in the phosphatase assay kit. Data were analyzed for significance using a two-tailed, two-sample equal variance Student's t test. DREAM/KChIP3 did not change the phosphatase activity of CN when CaM was not present in the reaction.
RESULTS
Analytical Ultracentrifugation and Size Exclusion Chromatography Reveal Dissociation of DREAM/KChIP3 Dimers upon Ca+ Binding
We hypothesized that conformational and oligomeric state changes occur upon the binding of Ca2+ to DREAM/KChIP3 that free up DREAM/KChIP3 monomers for interaction with proteins within neuronal cells. To clarify previously described changes in the oligomerization state of DREAM/KChIP3 upon Ca2+ binding (6, 24, 25), we performed analytical ultracentrifugation experiments on full-length DREAM/KChIP3 and sFL-DREAM/KChIP3. Size exclusion chromatography (Fig. 1) demonstrates that DREAM/KChIP3 exists solely as a dimer in the apo-state with a Ve/Vo ratio of 2.03, corresponding to a molecular mass of ∼49 kDa. In the presence of 50 mm Ca2+, DREAM/KChIP3 dissociates to exist in equilibrium between monomeric and dimeric states and has a bi-modal distribution with a second Ve/Vo of 2.15, corresponding to a molecular mass of ∼25 kDa. These data are confirmed by analytical ultracentrifugation (data not shown). The Kd values for the Ca2+-bound DREAM dimer, determined by fitting the data to a monomer to dimer equilibrium model, are ∼1.17 and 1.52 μm for Fl-DREAM/KChIP3 and sFL-DREAM/KChIP3, respectively.
FIGURE 1.
A, shown are chromatograms from size exclusion chromatography experiments of FL-DREAM in the presence of 500 μm EDTA or 50 mm CaCl2. ApoDREAM/KChIP3 had a Ve/Vo ratio of 2.03 as determined by fitting the elution profile to a single distribution. The elution profile of FL-DREAM in the presence of 50 mm CaCl2 was fitted to a bimodal distribution and resulted in a second Ve/Vo of 2.15. A.U., absorbance units. B, shown is a low molecular mass calibration curve of HR 200 Superdex column using standards (Ve/Vo, approximate molecular mass): transferrin (1.90, 81 kDa), ovalbumin (2.02, 43 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (2.16, 29 kDa), RNase A (2.70. 12.4 kDa), and vitamin B (1.33, 2.61 kDa). Red arrows indicate the Ve/Vo positions where apo- and Ca2+-bound DREAM/KChIP3 elutes.
DREAM/KChIP3 Binds Several Neuronal Proteins in the Presence and Absence of Ca2+
To determine Ca2+-dependent and Ca2+-independent interactions of neuronal cell proteins with DREAM/KChIP3, we preformed affinity pulldown assays using clarified rat brain homogenate with GST or GST-DREAM/KChIP3 columns. Four conditions were tested. Two columns contained glutathione resin saturated with GST-DREAM/KChIP3 and equilibrated with buffer containing either Ca2+ or EDTA (buffer A and B, respectively; see “Material and Methods”). The other two control columns contained glutathione resin saturated with GST and equilibrated with buffer A or buffer B. Total GST-DREAM/KChIP3 and GST bound to the glutathione resin were 18.4, and 9.0 mg protein/ml resin, respectively. Total protein from rat brain homogenate prepared in buffer A and applied to the glutathione columns equilibrated with buffer A was 16.63 mg. Total protein from rat brain homogenate in buffer B applied to the glutathione columns equilibrated with buffer B was 15.28 mg. Total protein bound to each column after applying 3.5 ml of homogenate to each column is summarized in Table 1. The relative molecular mass of proteins on SDS/PAGE was similar to the calculated theoretical molecular weight of identified proteins and is a good indication of minimal proteolysis. The final high salt wash before elution with reduced glutathione was included to remove any nonspecific interactions with the column resin and bound proteins. As a result, the SDS-PAGE analysis and the following mass spectrometry of gel lanes resulted in consistent and clear analysis of the sequencing data with minimal bacterial proteins identified.
TABLE 1.
Column preparation for DREAM/KChIP3 affinity capture assay
Proteins (GST-DREAM/KChIP3 or GST) bound to glutathione columns (column 3); brain homogenates applied to column (column 4), and retained by columns in the presence or absence of calcium (column 6).
Condition | Column | Protein bound to resin | Protein from rat brain homogenate applied to columns | Total unbound homogenate | Total protein from homogenate bound to column | Total protein eluted with 50 mm glutathione after all wash steps |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mg protein/ ml resin | mg | mg | mg | mg | ||
Ca2+ buffer | GST-DREAM/KChIP3 | 18.4 | 16.63 | 12.04 | 4.59 | 0.145 |
GST | 9.0 | 11.50 | 5.13 | 0.156 | ||
EDTA buffer | GST-DREAM/KChIP3 | 18.4 | 15.28 | 8.62 | 6.66 | 0.146 |
GST | 9.0 | 11.37 | 3.91 | 0.145 |
A greater number of protein bands of varying molecular weight were visible by Coomassie staining of SDS-PAGE lanes in eluates from GST-DREAM/KChIP3 columns in the presence or absence of Ca2+ compared with the eluates from GST columns run under identical conditions (Fig. 2A). Forty proteins were identified as having significant interactions with Ca2+-bound DREAM/KChIP3 (Table 2). Of these, 22 interacted exclusively with Ca2+-bound DREAM/KChIP3 and 3 with apoDREAM/KChIP3. There were a total of 18 proteins identified as having a Ca2+-independent interactions with DREAM/KChIP3. Five proteins containing EF-hand motifs bound to Ca2+-bound DREAM/KChIP3 exclusively in the presence of Ca2+. Four of the bound EF-hand proteins belong to the NCS family of proteins (neuron-specific hippocalcin, neurocalcin-δ, hippocalcin-like protein-4, visinin-like protein-1) (Fig. 2B). The final EF-hand protein bound to Ca2+-DREAM/KChIP3 was CaM, an important Ca2+-dependent second messenger protein (Fig. 2B). One EF-hand protein, CN subunit β type 1, was found to bind to apoDREAM/KChIP3.
TABLE 2.
Proteins identified as having significant interactions with Ca2+-bound and apo-DREAM/KChIP3
Unique peptide count is reported as */∧ where * is the number of unique peptides found for the Ca2+-DREAM condition, and ∧ is the number of unique peptides for the apo-DREAM condition. EF-hand proteins that interact with DREAM/KChIP3 are italicized.
Identified protein | Number of unique peptides (Ca2+/EDTA) | Molecular weight |
---|---|---|
Da | ||
Ca2+ interactions only | ||
AP-2 complex subunit α-1 | 7/− | 107,548.70 |
Na+/K+-transporting ATPase subunit α1 | 3/− | 111,751.50 |
Active breakpoint cluster region-related protein | 4/− | 97,615.20 |
Glycogen phosphorylase, brain form | 4/− | 96,342.60 |
Matrin-3 | 5/− | 94,626.70 |
Trifunctional enzyme subunit α, mitochondrial | 4/− | 82,666.90 |
Ubiquilin-4 | 3/− | 63,506.30 |
T-complex protein 1 subunit γ | 12/− | 60,587.20 |
1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 24-hydroxylase, mitochondrial | 3/− | 59,450.60 |
Isocitrate dehydrogenase | 6/− | 39,668.70 |
NAD subunit a NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 2 | 12/− | 39,320.70 |
ATPase ASNA 1 | 5/− | 38,793.50 |
Anionic trypsin-1 | 2/1 | 25,959.10 |
Cofilin-1 | 3/2 | 18,533.20 |
GTPase NRas | 3/− | 21,256.30 |
Transcription elongation factor B polypeptide 2 | 3/− | 13,170.20 |
Reticulon-1 | 2/3 | 83,573.60 |
Neuron-specific calcium-binding protein hippocalcin | 3/− | 22,428.50 |
Neurocalcin-δ | 4/− | 22,246.30 |
Hippocalcin-like protein 4 | 3/− | 22,203.50 |
Calmodulin | 12/1 | 16,838.00 |
Visinin-like protein 1 | 11/− | 22,143.40 |
Interactions with apoDREAM only | ||
Complement C3 | -/3 | 187,255.10 |
40 S ribosomal protein S18 | -/5 | 17,719.30 |
Calcineurin subunit β type 1 | 1/3 | 19,300.40 |
Ca2+-independent interactions | ||
Contactin-1 | 3/3 | 113,386.80 |
Ras-related protein Rab-3C | 9/9 | 25,872.70 |
Ras-related protein Rab-11B | 4/3 | 24,489.00 |
Ras-related protein Rab-14 | 11/8 | 23,897.60 |
Ras-related protein Rab-6A | 3/4 | 23,491.40 |
Ras-related protein Rab-4B | 1/3 | 23,587.20 |
Ras-related protein Rab-2A | 3/7 | 23,546.20 |
Ras-related protein Rab-7A | 10/5 | 23,544.10 |
Ras-related protein Rab-1A | 7/9 | 22,678.50 |
Ras-related protein Rab-10 | 4/4 | 22,570.10 |
Transforming protein RhoA | 10/11 | 21,768.40 |
Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 | 5/6 | 21,450.60 |
Rho-related GTP-binding protein RhoG | 6/5 | 21,308.10 |
Cell division control protein 42 homolog | 5/4 | 21,258.80 |
Ras-related protein Rap-1A | 8/8 | 20,987.30 |
ATP synthase subunit B | 6/7 | 17,264.50 |
Mitochondrial fission 1 protein | 2/8 | 17,009.20 |
Peroxiredoxin-2 | 3/2 | 21,779.10 |
A large proportion of proteins that were identified as having Ca2+-independent interactions with DREAM/KChIP3 belonged to the Ras-related Rab family of proteins that regulate intracellular protein and membrane traffic. Proteins that interacted exclusively with apoDREAM/KChIP3 were CN subunit β type 1, complement C3, and 40 S ribosomal protein S18. Other proteins identified include contactin-1, peroxiredoxin-2, mitochondrial fission 1 protein, and ATP synthase subunit B. The numbers of unique peptides found for proteins that interact with DREAM/KChIP3 in a Ca2+-independent manner are of similar magnitude (Table 2).
CaM Binds DREAM/KChIP3 with Micromolar Affinity
We investigated the role of DREAM/KChIP3 in binding to and regulating the activity of CaM as the latter protein is an important EF-hand protein with multiple roles in cellular signaling (26). We investigated the Ca2+-dependent interaction of DREAM/KChIP3 with EF-hand protein CaM by monitoring the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of DREAM/KChIP3 and sFL-DREAM/KChIP3 as a function of the Ca2+ concentration in the presence and absence of an equivalent molar concentration of CaM. CaM does not contain tryptophan residues, so the fluorescence contribution of CaM is minimized by selectively exciting at 295 nm to allow the observation of changes in tryptophan fluorescence of DREAM/KChIP3. The fluorescence spectrum of DREAM/KChIP3 is blue-shifted and decreased in intensity with increasing Ca2+ concentrations, consistent with previously reported measurements (6). In the presence of equimolar CaM, the fluorescence spectrum of DREAM/KChIP3 was strikingly different. The fluorescence emission spectrum was blue-shifted and increased in intensity as the Ca2+ concentrations were increased (Fig. 3A). The increase in intensity was maximal between Ca2+ concentrations of 1 μm and 1 mm and decreased linearly at higher concentrations of Ca2+. In contrast, sFL-DREAM/KChIP3 and sFL-DREAM/KChIP3 in the presence of CaM had identical tryptophan fluorescence changes with increasing Ca2+ concentrations (Fig. 3A). Similar titrations conducted with CaM alone displayed no change in fluorescence intensity, and in addition the fluorescence response curve of sFL-DREAM/KChIP3 in the presence and absence of CaM suggests that CaM does not complicate the fluorescence spectra, confirming method specificity for observing changes in DREAM/KChIP3 fluorescence. The results clearly indicate that the NH2-terminal portion of DREAM/KChIP3 is necessary for binding CaM and that Ca2+ binding to DREAM/KChIP3 results in a conformational change in DREAM/KChIP3 to confer this specificity.
FIGURE 3.
Calcium-dependent interaction between DREAM/KChIP3 and CaM. A, intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of DREAM/KChIP3 (A) and sFL-DREAM/KChIP3 (B) in the presence (circles) and absence (squares) of equimolar CaM is shown. The maximal change in fluorescence for FL-DREAM/KChIP3 upon binding to CaM was 20% and was observed in the 1 μm–1 mm Ca2+ concentration range. C, normalized equilibrium binding curve of 5 μm DREAM/KChIP3 as a function of increasing CaM concentration is shown.
Because we observed a Ca2+-dependent fluorescence change of DREAM/KChIP3 in the presence of CaM, we sought to determine the apparent Kd of the DREAM/KChIP3-CaM complex by monitoring the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of DREAM/KChIP3 in the presence of 100 μm Ca2+ and as a function of the CaM concentration. A concentration of 100 μm Ca2+ was used because of the maximal change in fluorescence and because this concentration provided a buffering window from small changes in Ca2+ concentrations as observed at the two limits where large changes begin (1 μm and 1 mm, Fig. 3B). The fluorescence intensity increases to a maximum of 20% upon saturation. Fitting the normalized data to a nonlinear hyperbolic binding curve results in an average Kd of 2.92 ± 1.11 μm (Fig. 3C). The equilibrium binding curve does not indicate nonspecific binding. A change in tryptophan fluorescence was not observed when similar experiments were conducted with sFL protein.
NMR Spectroscopy of 15N-Labeled DREAM/KChIP3 Demonstrates Binding to CaM
We recorded 1H,15N HSQC spectra of 15N-labeled DREAM/KChIP3 to probe resonance changes upon binding to unlabeled CaM. Several resonances in the HSQC spectrum of DREAM/KChIP3 disappeared due to exchange broadening upon the addition of CaM in the presence of saturating levels of Ca2+ (Fig. 4). Changes in downfield peaks are clearly visible between the 9.2- and 10.2-ppm region. Slight differences in peak intensity between free Ca2+-DREAM/KChIP3 and Ca2+-DREAM/KChIP3 in complex with CaM are observed for the downfield glycine residues typical for Ca2+-bound EF-hand protein (10.5–11.0 ppm). The observed disappearance of NMR signals is likely due to intermediate exchange on the time scale of NMR chemical shifts between free and CaM-bound DREAM/KChIP3. Exchange broadening is consistent with the measured Kd of ∼3 μm for the DREAM/KChIP3-CaM interaction.
FIGURE 4.
1H,15N NMR correlation spectroscopy of DREAM/KChIP3. Two-dimensional 1H,15N HSQC spectra of 100 μm DREAM/KChIP3 in the absence (black contours) and presence (red contours) of 50 μm CaM are shown. Arrows indicate resonance signals of free DREAM/KChIP3 that are exchanged broadened upon binding to CaM.
DREAM/KChIP3 Increases Ca2+-CaM Calcineurin Activity
To assess the functional significance of the interaction between DREAM/KChIP3 and CaM, we assayed CN phosphatase activity in the presence of DREAM/KChIP3 alone, CaM alone, and DREAM/KChIP3 and CaM in varying ratios (Fig. 5A). The activity in the presence of CaM and DREAM/KChIP3 at equimolar and at 10-fold higher concentrations increased CN phosphatase activity ∼22 and 37%, respectively, relative to CaM alone. As would be expected on account of a lack of binding to CaM, sFL-DREAM/KChIP3 did not increase CN phosphatase activity.
FIGURE 5.
Calcineurin activity assay. A, shown is phosphatase activity of CN in the presence of CaM only, CaM and equimolar DREAM/KChIP3, or sFL-DREAM/KChIP3 or a 10-to-1 molar ratio of DREAM/KChIP3-to-CaM. B, shown is phosphatase activity of CN in the presence of CaM only and CaM with equimolar DREAM/KChIP3 or EFMut1234-DREAM/KChIP3. Student's t test was performed to evaluate differences among groups. ***, p < 0.005; **, p < 0.05.
To assess the calcium dependence of CN activation by CaM and DREAM, we repeated the assay with a Ca2+-insensitive mutant of DREAM. EF-hand Mut1234-DREAM/KChIP3 Ca2+ binding was greatly diminished when compared with that of full-length, wild type DREAM/KChIP3. Despite its inability to bind Ca, the EF-hand Mut1234-DREAM/KChIP3 enhanced CaM-stimulated CN activity (Fig. 5B) to the same extent as wt-DREAM.
DISCUSSION
Our findings suggest novel functional roles of DREAM/KChIP3 within neuronal cells. Our salient observation is that DREAM/KChIP3 binds CaM, another EF-hand protein, in a Ca2+-dependent manner. In the absence of Ca2+, DREAM/KChIP3 fails to bind CaM, whereas upon the addition of Ca2+, binding occurs. In the presence of Ca2+, DREAM/KChIP3 has a Kd for CaM of ∼3 μm. Our data show that amino-terminal 94 residues of DREAM/KChIP3 that lack EF-hand motifs are required for binding of DREAM/KChIP3 to CaM. A mutant of DREAM incapable of binding Ca2+ enhances CaM-stimulated CN activity, demonstrating that Ca2+-dependent changes in DREAM/KChIP3 are not essential for the activation process. This is also consistent with the stimulatory role of the NH2-terminal portion of DREAM/KChIP3, which does bind calcium. Because the binding of Ca2+ brings about the dissociation of dimeric DREAM/KChIP3, it suggests but does not conclusively prove that monomeric DREAM/KChIP3 binds to CaM. We cannot, however, rule out the binding of the dimer of DREAM/KChIP3 to CaM. Interestingly and of relevance to the regulation of CN (see below), apoDREAM/KChIP3 binds the regulatory subunit of CN. This interaction is abolished in the presence of Ca2+.
The binding of Ca2+-bound DREAM/KChIP3 to CaM alters the capacity of CaM to activate the serine/threonine phosphatase, CN, which functions in diverse biological roles including the modulation of immune function, cardiac hypertrophy, and neural processes (30–32). CN plays an important role in neuronal function (32). CN-deficient mice display behavioral characteristics similar to humans with schizophrenia, memory impairment, and attention deficit disorder (33). Inhibition of CN results in CN inhibitor-induced pain syndromes (34, 35). The activation of CN by DREAM/KChIP3 requires full-length protein, Ca2+, and CaM. The binding of Ca2+ to CN results in activation of its serine-threonine phosphatase activity, and the addition of CaM results in approximately a 10-fold increase in CN activity (36). CN is a heterodimer composed of catalytic (CNA) and regulatory (CNB) subunits. The CNA is responsible for recognizing and dephosphorylating protein substrates, and CNB is an EF-hand protein that binds Ca2+ and increases the activity of CNA. Interaction of CNA with CaM and CNB enhances the phosphatase activity of CNA (36). Calcium-bound CaM and CNB activate CNA by different mechanisms. CaM increases the rate of dephosphorylation of CNA by displacing the autoinhibitory domain, whereas binding of CNB results in an increase in affinity of CNA for its substrate (36). Calcium binding to both low affinity sites of CNB and CaM is required for CNA activation (36).
We suggest that under basal intracellular Ca2+ conditions, apoDREAM/KChIP3 binds to CNB, thus inhibiting CNA activation of CN. When intracellular Ca2+ concentrations increase, DREAM/KChIP3 dissociates from CNB, allowing CNB to activate CNA. Ca2+-bound DREAM/KChIP3 associates with CaM to further enhance CaM activation of CNA. The differences in affinities for Ca2+ between CNB, CaM, and DREAM/KChIP3 are likely to be an important factor regulating CN activity.
The Ca2+-dependent interactions of DREAM/KChIP3 with other neuronal EF-hand proteins suggests a potential role of DREAM/KChIP3 as a regulator of other neuronal functions. To the best of our knowledge, the interaction of an EF-hand protein to multiple other EF-hand NCS family proteins has not been previously observed. NCS-1, another EF-hand protein, has been implicated in regulating neuronal processes in a Ca2+ dependent manner, but the precise mechanism by which this occurs has not been elucidated, and it is unknown whether this involves other EF-hand partners (27, 28). Among the interacting EF-hand proteins are neuron-specific hippocalcin, neurocalcin-δ, hippocalcin-like protein-4, and visinin-like protein-1, which belong to the NCS family of proteins. All four proteins are 65% homologous, which suggests the presence of a common binding mechanism or motif to DREAM/KChIP3.
Other investigators have demonstrated interactions of DREAM/KChIP3 with other proteins. For example, Rivas et al. (29) have reported that DREAM/KChIP3 interacts with a mitochondrial thiol-specific antioxidant protein, peroxiredoxin-3. Interestingly, we found that DREAM/KChIP3 binds peroxiredoxin-2 in a calcium-independent manner. These findings provide further evidence for a role of DREAM/KChIP3 in the regulation of oxidative stress within neuronal cells. In conclusion, DREAM/KChIP3 binds CaM and regulates CN function through Ca2+-dependent mechanisms. This novel mechanism could be exploited for therapeutic purposes.
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants AR-058003 and AR-60869. This work was also supported by a grant from the Marion and Ralph Falk Medical Trust.
- DREAM
- downstream regulatory element antagonist modulator
- apoDREAM/KChIP3
- metal-free DREAM/KChIP3
- Ca2+-DREAM/KChIP3
- Ca2+-bound DREAM/KChIP3
- CaM
- calmodulin
- CN
- calcineurin
- NCS
- neuronal calcium sensor
- FL
- full-length
- sFL
- short FL
- sFL-DREAM
- NH2-terminal truncated variant of DREAM containing residues from 95–256
- HSQC
- heteronuclear single quantum coherence
- KChIP3
- potassium channel interacting protein-3
- DRE
- downstream regulatory element.
REFERENCES
- 1. Carrión A. M., Link W. A., Ledo F., Mellström B., Naranjo J. R. (1999) DREAM is a Ca2+-regulated transcriptional repressor. Nature 398, 80–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ledo F., Carrión A. M., Link W. A., Mellström B., Naranjo J. R. (2000) DREAM-αCREM interaction via leucine-charged domains derepresses downstream regulatory element-dependent transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 9120–9126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mellström B., Naranjo J. R. (2001) Ca2+-dependent transcriptional repression and derepression. DREAM, a direct effector. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 59–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Buxbaum J. D., Choi E. K., Luo Y., Lilliehook C., Crowley A. C., Merriam D. E., Wasco W. (1998) Calsenilin. A calcium-binding protein that interacts with the presenilins and regulates the levels of a presenilin fragment. Nat Med 4, 1177–1181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Choi E. K., Zaidi N. F., Miller J. S., Crowley A. C., Merriam D. E., Lilliehook C., Buxbaum J. D., Wasco W. (2001) Calsenilin is a substrate for caspase-3 that preferentially interacts with the familial Alzheimer disease-associated C-terminal fragment of presenilin 2. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 19197–19204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Craig T. A., Benson L. M., Venyaminov S. Y., Klimtchuk E. S., Bajzer Z., Prendergast F. G., Naylor S., Kumar R. (2002) The metal-binding properties of DREAM. Evidence for calcium-mediated changes in DREAM structure. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 10955–10966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hammond P. I., Craig T. A., Kumar R., Brimijoin S. (2003) Regional and cellular distribution of DREAM in adult rat brain consistent with multiple sensory processing roles. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 111, 104–110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Rivas M., Mellström B., Naranjo J. R., Santisteban P. (2004) Transcriptional repressor DREAM interacts with thyroid transcription factor-1 and regulates thyroglobulin gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 33114–33122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Rivas M., Villar D., González P., Dopazo X. M., Mellstrom B., Naranjo J. R. (2011) Building the DREAM interactome. Sci. China Life Sci 54, 786–792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Leissring M. A., Yamasaki T. R., Wasco W., Buxbaum J. D., Parker I., LaFerla F. M. (2000) Calsenilin reverses presenilin-mediated enhancement of calcium signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 8590–8593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lilliehook C., Chan S., Choi E. K., Zaidi N. F., Wasco W., Mattson M. P., Buxbaum J. D. (2002) Calsenilin enhances apoptosis by altering endoplasmic reticulum calcium signaling. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 19, 552–559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Alexander J. C., McDermott C. M., Tunur T., Rands V., Stelly C., Karhson D., Bowlby M. R., An W. F., Sweatt J. D., Schrader L. A. (2009) The role of calsenilin/DREAM/KChIP3 in contextual fear conditioning. Learn. Mem. 16, 167–177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Cheng H. Y., Pitcher G. M., Laviolette S. R., Whishaw I. Q., Tong K. I., Kockeritz L. K., Wada T., Joza N. A., Crackower M., Goncalves J., Sarosi I., Woodgett J. R., Oliveira-dos-Santos A. J., Ikura M., van der Kooy D., Salter M. W., Penninger J. M. (2002) DREAM is a critical transcriptional repressor for pain modulation. Cell 108, 31–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lilliehook C., Bozdagi O., Yao J., Gomez-Ramirez M., Zaidi N. F., Wasco W., Gandy S., Santucci A. C., Haroutunian V., Huntley G. W., Buxbaum J. D. (2003) Altered Aβ formation and long term potentiation in a calsenilin knock-out. J. Neurosci. 23, 9097–9106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. An W. F., Bowlby M. R., Betty M., Cao J., Ling H. P., Mendoza G., Hinson J. W., Mattsson K. I., Strassle B. W., Trimmer J. S., Rhodes K. J. (2000) Modulation of A-type potassium channels by a family of calcium sensors. Nature 403, 553–556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Thomsen M. B., Wang C., Ozgen N., Wang H. G., Rosen M. R., Pitt G. S. (2009) Accessory subunit KChIP2 modulates the cardiac L-type calcium current. Circ. Res. 104, 1382–1389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Zhang Y., Su P., Liang P., Liu T., Liu X., Liu X. Y., Zhang B., Han T., Zhu Y. B., Yin D. M., Li J., Zhou Z., Wang K. W., Wang Y. (2010) The DREAM protein negatively regulates the NMDA receptor through interaction with the NR1 subunit. J. Neurosci. 30, 7575–7586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Juranić N., Atanasova E., Streiff J. H., Macura S., Prendergast F. G. (2007) Solvent-induced differentiation of protein backbone hydrogen bonds in calmodulin. Protein Sci. 16, 1329–1337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Baden E. M., Owen B. A., Peterson F. C., Volkman B. F., Ramirez-Alvarado M., Thompson J. R. (2008) Altered dimer interface decreases stability in an amyloidogenic protein. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 15853–15860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Owen B. A., Sullivan W. P., Felts S. J., Toft D. O. (2002) Regulation of heat shock protein 90 ATPase activity by sequences in the carboxyl terminus. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 7086–7091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Owen B. A., Yang Z., Lai M., Gajec M., Gajek M., Badger J. D., 2nd, Hayes J. J., Edelmann W., Kucherlapati R., Wilson T. M., McMurray C. T. (2005) (CAG)(n)-hairpin DNA binds to Msh2-Msh3 and changes properties of mismatch recognition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 663–670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Vistica J., Dam J., Balbo A., Yikilmaz E., Mariuzza R. A., Rouault T. A., Schuck P. (2004) Sedimentation equilibrium analysis of protein interactions with global implicit mass conservation constraints and systematic noise decomposition. Anal. Biochem. 326, 234–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Schneider C. A., Rasband W. S., Eliceiri K. W. (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ. 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Osawa M., Dace A., Tong K. I., Valiveti A., Ikura M., Ames J. B. (2005) Mg2+ and Ca2+ differentially regulate DNA binding and dimerization of DREAM. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 18008–18014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Osawa M., Tong K. I., Lilliehook C., Wasco W., Buxbaum J. D., Cheng H. Y., Penninger J. M., Ikura M., Ames J. B. (2001) Calcium-regulated DNA binding and oligomerization of the neuronal calcium-sensing protein, calsenilin/DREAM/KChIP3. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 41005–41013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hanson P. I., Schulman H. (1992) Neuronal Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 559–601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ames J. B., Lim S., Ikura M. (2012) Molecular structure and target recognition of neuronal calcium sensor proteins. Front. Mol. Neurosci 5, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 28. Kretsinger R. H. (2012) Neuronal calcium sensor proteins. Recognizing a face in a crowd. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 5, 41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Rivas M., Aurrekoetxea K., Mellström B., Naranjo J. R. (2011) Redox signaling regulates transcriptional activity of the Ca2+-dependent repressor DREAM. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 14, 1237–1243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Li H., Rao A., Hogan P. G. (2011) Interaction of calcineurin with substrates and targeting proteins. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 91–103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Frost R. J., Olson E. N. (2010) Separating the good and evil of cardiac growth by CIB1 and calcineurin. Cell Metab 12, 205–206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hara M. R., Snyder S. H. (2007) Cell signaling and neuronal death. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 47, 117–141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Miyakawa T., Leiter L. M., Gerber D. J., Gainetdinov R. R., Sotnikova T. D., Zeng H., Caron M. G., Tonegawa S. (2003) Conditional calcineurin knockout mice exhibit multiple abnormal behaviors related to schizophrenia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 8987–8992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Sato Y., Onaka T., Kobayashi E., Seo N. (2007) The differential effect of cyclosporine on hypnotic response and pain reaction in mice. Anesth. Analg. 105, 1489–1493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kakihana K., Ohashi K., Murata Y., Tsubokura M., Kobayashi T., Yamashita T., Sakamaki H., Akiyama H. (2012) Clinical features of calcineurin inhibitor-induced pain syndrome after allo-SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 47, 593–595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Stemmer P. M., Klee C. B. (1994) Dual calcium ion regulation of calcineurin by calmodulin and calcineurin B. Biochemistry 33, 6859–6866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]