Abstract
A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was ‘do all patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis need surgery?’ Seventeen papers were found using the reported search that represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. These studies compared the outcome and survival between surgically and non-surgically treated patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis. Of these studies, two were prospective observational studies and the rest were retrospective studies. The results of most of these papers were in accordance with the guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart association. These studies showed that unless a patient is not a surgical candidate, an operation is the treatment of choice in prosthetic valve endocarditis. Surgery should be performed as soon as possible, particularly in haemodynamically unstable patients and those who develop complications such as heart failure, valvular dysfunction, regurgitation/obstruction, dehiscence and annular abscess. In addition to the above indications and cardiac/valvularrelated complications of prosthetic valve endocarditis, infection with Staphylococcus aureus plays an important role in the outcome, and the presence of this micro-organism should be considered an urgent surgical indication in the treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis. Surgery should be performed before the development of any cerebral or other complications. In contrast, in stable patients with other micro-organisms, particularly those with organisms sensitive to antibiotic treatment who have no structural valvular damage or cardiac complications, surgery can be postponed. The option of surgical intervention can also be revisited if there is a change in response to the treatment. This option is reserved for selected patients only and we conclude that as soon as the diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis is made, cardiac surgeons should be involved.
Keywords: Review, Prosthetic valve, Endocarditis, Surgery
INTRODUCTION
A best evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol. This is fully described in the ICVTS [1].
THREE-PART QUESTION
In [patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) (mechanical/biological)] does [surgical intervention/surgery] result in [better outcome/survival rate].
CLINICAL SCENARIO
A surgical review has been requested for a 73-year old man with diabetes, renal failure and a previous stroke who had a mechanical aortic valve replacement 15 years ago. The patient was admitted with septicaemia and investigations confirmed endocarditis of the mechanical prosthesis associated with moderate aortic regurgitation. He has been started on broad-spectrum antibiotics and surgical intervention needs to be considered. A redo aortic valve replacement is considered high risk and you decide to check the literature yourself before reaching a decision.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Medline 1950 to June 2012 using OVID interface [exp prosthetic valve endocarditis/OR surgical intervention/surgery.mp] AND [exp prosthetic valve/OR treatment.mp OR exp prosthetic valve endocarditis/OR treatment.mp].
SEARCH OUTCOME
Seventeen papers that provided data to answer the question were found using the reported search. Non-English papers and those that did not compare surgery plus medical therapy with medical therapy alone were excluded. No randomized controlled trials were identified. There were only two prospective observational studies and the rest were retrospective reviews. These studies are presented in Table 1.
Table 1:
Studies on prosthetic valve endocarditis
| Author, date, journal, country Study type (level of evidence) |
Patient group | Outcomes | Key results | Comments and limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calderwood et al. [3], 1986, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Retrospective (level III) |
PVE 116; 45 non-surgical, 71 surgical | In complicated PVE better outcome observed with surgical treatment | Outcome difference (P <0.05) | Surgery was used mainly in complicated PVE and S. aureus infection Survival was influenced by congestive cardiac failure |
| Yu et al. [4], 1994, Ann Thorac Surg Prospective, observational, multi-centric (II) |
PVE 74 | Lower mortality with surgery compared with non-surgical treatment | Mortality (P <0.05); • Non-surgical = 56% • Surgical = 23% |
|
| Otaki [5], 1994, ASAIO J Retrospective (level III) |
PVE 32; 7 non-surgical, 25 surgical | Non-surgical group all died Higher mortality with early onset PVE compared with late onset |
In-hospital mortality (P < 0.05); • Nonsurgical = 100% • Surgical = 16% |
Patients in non-surgical group were not surgical candidates due to cerebral complications or cardiogenic shock and all died subsequently |
| Wolf et al. [6], 1995, Chest Retrospective (level III) |
PVE 122; 57 non-surgical, 65 surgical | Overall mortality with antibiotics only was higher compared with surgery, however, this significance was due to S. aureus PVE | Mortality at 4 months (P < 0.05); • Non-surgical = 48% • Surgical = 25% Mortality in S. aureus group (P < 0.05) • Non-surgical = 100% • Surgical = 55% Mortality in non-S. aureus (P = NS) • Non-surgical = 81% • Surgical = 89% |
S.
aureus was the main predictor of death Similar survival was observed between patients that were operated on within 8 days after admission compared with those operated on later |
| Ho et al. [7], 2010, Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann Retrospective (level III) |
80 PVE; 46 non-surgical, 34 surgical | Surgery more beneficial in S. aureus and valve dysfunction | In-hospital mortality (P < 0.05) • Non-surgical = 37% • Surgical = 15% |
Surgery required more in early onset PVE Heart failure was the only independent predictor of hospital mortality |
| John et al. [8], 1997, Clin Infect Dis Retrospective (level III) |
33 PVE; (S. aureus) 9 non-surgical, 14 surgical | Surgical group with or without complications did better compared with the non-surgical group | In-hospital mortality (P < 0.05); • Non-surgical = 63% • Surgical = 14% |
All patients with S. aureus PVE benefit from surgery even without evidence of cardiac complications Higher mortality with central nervous system involvement is seen and surgery was offered in one patient only |
| Sohail et al. [9], 2006, Am J Med Retrospective (level III) |
55 PVE (S. aureus); non-surgical 23, surgical 32 | Mortality was significantly higher in non-surgical group | In-hospital mortality (P < 0.05) • Non-surgical = 48% • Surgical = 28% |
Surgical group were younger, had lower American Society of Anaesthesia grade Study population was collected for a 20-year period but no difference in the study outcome at the beginning and end of the study was found |
| Gordon et al. [10], 2000, Ann Thorac Surg Retrospective (level III) |
77 PVE (early onset, within 12 months); 23 non-surgical, 54 surgical | Significantly better outcome with surgery in short- and long-term | PVE = 1% 30-day mortality (P < 0.05) • Non-surgical = 35% • Surgical = 8% 1-year mortality (P < 0.05) • Non-surgical = 60% • Surgical = 26% 2-year mortality (P < 0.05) • Non-surgical = 63% • Surgical = 35% 3-year mortality (P < 0.05) • Non-surgical = 67% • Surgical = 39% |
Almost half of the patients in the non-surgical group were too sick to be offered surgery which influences the survival data Decreased trend of PVE over the recent years |
| Akowuah et al. [11], 2003, Heart Retrospective (level III) |
66 PVE; 28 non-surgical, 38 surgical |
Better outcome with surgery but some selected patients can be treated with Abx alone | PVE Incidence = 4.5% In-hospital mortality (P < 0.05) • Non-surgical = 46% • Surgical = 24% 10-year survival (P < 0.05) • Non-surgical = 28% • Surgical = 58% Freedom from endocarditis (P = NS) • Non-surgical = 65% • Surgical = 60% 29% in Abx group required surgery later |
Selection bias: some were too sick for surgery and died |
| Alonso-Valle et al. [12], 2010, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Retrospective (level III) |
122 PVE; 26 non-surgical, 107 surgical | Better outcome with surgery after 1 year. Patients with perivalvular abscess have worse prognosis Surgery is treatment of choice |
PVE Incidence = 2.2% In-hospital mortality (P = NS) • Non-surgical = 42% • Surgical = 26% 1-year survival (P < 0.05) • Non-surgical = 42% • Surgical = 71% |
Small percentage of patients in non-surgical group were included Early onset more common with mechanical valves Selection bias: non-surgical patients had no valvular dysfunction |
| Habib et al. [13], 2005, Heart Retrospective (level III) |
104 PVE; 53 non-surgical, 51 surgical | Less mortality and better survival in staph group and complicated group with surgery compared with non-surgical | PVE incidence = 2% All patients in-hospital mortality (P = NS) • Non-surgical = 17% • Surgical = 25% Significantly lower in complicated group |
Early onset more common with mechanical valves Selection bias exists Conservative treatment is preserved for patients with uncomplicated and non-S. aureus PVE |
| Kuyvenhoven et al. [14], 1994, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Retrospective (level III) |
70 PVE; 27 non-surgical, 43 surgical | Surgical group had better survival. Patients too ill for surgery were put in non-surgical group and all died | In-hospital mortality (P = NS) • Non-surgical = 30% • Surgical = 26% |
Micro-organism and heart failure rather than other complications Mortality in surgical group correlated with abscess formation and dehiscence |
| López et al. [15], 2007, Eur Heart J Observational (level II) |
66 PVE; 29 non-surgical, 37 surgical | No difference between surgical and non-surgical groups | In-hospital mortality (P = NS) • Non-surgical = 45% • Surgical = 32% |
No long-term outcome Comparing surgical and non-surgical groups was not primary endpoint |
| Chirouze et al. [16], 2004, Clin Infect Dis Retrospective (multi-centric) (level III) |
61 PVE; (S. aureus) 40 non-surgical, 21 early surgery | More heart failure in surgical group. No difference in mortality | PVE = 2.8% Heart failure (P = NS) • Non-surgical = 30%, • Early surgery = 42% Difference in mortality (P = NS) Overall mortality = 47% |
Stroke was the only prognostic factor Lowest mortality with early surgery in group with cardiac complications Early surgery may not be beneficial in all |
| Tornos et al. [17], 1997, Clin Infect Dis Retrospective (level III) |
Late onset PVE 59; 42 non-surgical, 17 surgical | PVE can be managed medically unless severe valve dysfunction is present | Late PVE = 11% In-hospital mortality (P = NS) • Non-surgical = 24% • Surgical = 29% Overall survival at 5-year (80%) and 10-years (63%) not different between groups (P = NS) |
S.
aureus PVE should undergo surgery Early surgery before cerebral complications recommended in these cases |
| Truninger et al. [18], 1999, Heart Retrospective (level III) |
PVE 49; 10 non-surgical, 39 surgical | Haemodynamically stable patients with non-staphylococcal PVE can be treated with antibiotics | Mortality at mid-term (P = NS) • Non-surgical = 18% • Surgical = 14% Mortality at long-term (P = NS) • Non-surgical = 16% • Surgical = 14% Need for reoperation (P = NS) • Non-surgical = 19% • Surgical = 14% |
More enterococcal in non-surgical group Valve dehiscence/abscess more in surgical group |
| Rekik et al. [19], 2009, Neth Heart J Retrospective (level III) |
PVE 48; 28 non-surgical, 20 surgical | Higher mortality in surgical group but not statistically significant | In-hospital mortality (P = NS) • Non-surgical = 14% • Surgical = 35% 14% in non-surgical group required surgery at a later date |
Longer delay to diagnosis, more heart failure were seen in surgical group |
PVE: prosthetic valve endocarditis; ASA: American Society of Anesthesia; S. aureus: Staphylococcus aureus; CNS: central nervous system.
RESULTS
PVE is a serious condition and several factors influence the outcome. Based on the guidelines of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, surgery is indicated for PVE resulting in haemodynamic instability, heart failure or valvular complications such as valve dysfunction/dehiscence, valvular obstruction/regurgitation or abscess formation (Class I). In persistent bacteraemia, relapsing infection and recurrent emboli, surgery is advisable (Class IIa). In cases of uncomplicated PVE with a sensitive organism, however, surgery is not indicated [2]. Our search showed that most studies published to date favour an aggressive approach to surgery for PVE.
In 1986, a study by Calderwood et al. [3] confirmed that patients with complicated PVE do significantly better with surgery compared with those treated with antibiotics alone. In that study, surgery was mainly used to treat complicated PVE associated with Staphylococcus aureus infection. Yu et al. [4] and Otaki [5] also showed better survival with surgery, however, the groups were not comparable and high-risk patients who were not surgical candidates were included in the antibiotic therapy group. Wolf et al. reported their results focusing on infection with S. aureus. Their analysis showed no difference with medical or surgical treatment of patients with PVE with non-staphylococcal organisms, whereas patients with S. aureus PVE had 100% mortality without surgery. They concluded that S. aureus PVE is the main predictor of outcome in PVE [6]. Similarly, Ho et al. [7] confirmed that surgery was more beneficial than medical therapy in S. aureus PVE. John et al. [8] and Sohail et al. [9] also reported the results of S. aureus PVE and showed significantly better outcome with surgery even in patients without valve-related complications.
In another study, 30-day, 1- and 3-year mortalities were shown to be significantly higher in a non-surgical group compared with those who had surgery, however, more than half of the patients in the non-surgical group were too ill to be operated on [10]. Ten-year survival was found to be significantly higher in the surgical group, but there was selection bias arising from the inclusion of non-surgical candidates in their analysis [11]. Other authors have shown better outcomes in these patients after 1 year when treated surgically, however, they failed to show any difference in the incidence of in-hospital mortality [12, 13]. In both of these studies, patients with valvular dysfunction were not included in the non-surgical category, and also conservative treatment was selected for patients with non-S. aureus PVE. Early onset of PVE was found to be more common with mechanical prostheses [12, 13]. Kuyvenhoven et al. [14] and López et al. [15] also showed no difference in the incidence of in-hospital mortality between treatment groups, but the type of micro-organism and the presence of heart failure were more important factors compared with other complications of PVE.
In contrast to the previous studies, Chirouze et al. showed that the overall mortality in S. aureus PVE was not different between the groups whether or not they had surgery. They included patients with heart failure in the surgical group and suggested that early surgery was only beneficial in patients with cardiac complications [16]. Tornos et al. studied late onset PVE and showed no difference between the groups with respect to in-hospital mortality, and 5- and 10-year survivals. They made a recommendation favouring early surgery for S. aureus PVE [17]. Truninger et al. also showed no difference in the mortality rate with or without surgery at mid- and long-term. His surgical group, however, included more patients with valvular complications whereas in his medical group, more patients with enterococcal PVE were included. He concluded that stable patients with non-staphylococcal PVE can be treated medically [18].
Only 1 of the 17 studies demonstrated a worse outcome with surgery, however, the difference did not reach statistical significance. A longer delay in establishing the diagnosis and more heart failure in the surgical group were noted in this study as factors that negatively affect the outcome of surgery [19].
CLINICAL BOTTOM LINE
Unless a patient is not a surgical candidate, in PVE, surgery is the treatment of choice. This is particularly the case in patients who develop complications as a result of PVE. These complications include heart failure, valvular dysfunction, valvular regurgitation or obstruction, valve dehiscence and annular abscess. In these patients, early surgery also improves the outcome and increases the survival.
Infection with S. aureus should be considered an indication for surgery in PVE even without cardiac or valvular complications. These patients should undergo surgery as soon as possible before cerebral complications develop. In patients with other micro-organisms, especially where the organism is sensitive to the particular antibiotic treatment regime and no structural damage or cardiac complications have occurred, surgery can be postponed or reconsidered if there is response to the treatment. This option should be considered for selected patients only and cardiac surgeons should be involved from the early stages of the diagnosis.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Dunning J, Prendergast B, Mackway-Jones K. Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2003;2:405–9. doi: 10.1016/S1569-9293(03)00191-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. 2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:e1–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Calderwood SB, Swinski LA, Karchmer AW, Waternaux CM, Buckley MJ. Prosthetic valve endocarditis. Analysis of factors affecting outcome of therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;92:776–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yu VL, Fang GD, Keys TF, Harris AA, Gentry LO, Fuchs PC, et al. Prosthetic valve endocarditis: superiority of surgical valve replacement versus medical therapy only. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58:1073–7. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90458-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Otaki M. Prosthetic valve endocarditis. An analysis of the outcome in 32 cases. ASAIO J. 1994;40:176–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wolff M, Witchitz S, Chastang C, Régnier B, Vachon F. Prosthetic valve endocarditis in the ICU. Prognostic factors of overall survival in a series of 122 cases and consequences for treatment decision. Chest. 1995;108:688–94. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.3.688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ho HH, Siu CW, Yiu KH, Tse HF, Chui WH, Chow WH. Prosthetic valve endocarditis in a multicenter registry of Chinese patients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2010;18:430–4. doi: 10.1177/0218492310379457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.John MD, Hibberd PL, Karchmer AW, Sleeper LA, Calderwood SB. Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve endocarditis: optimal management and risk factors for death. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1302–9. doi: 10.1086/516378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sohail MR, Martin KR, Wilson WR, Baddour LM, Harmsen WS, Steckelberg JM. Medical versus surgical management of staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve endocarditis. Am J Med. 2006;119:147–54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gordon SM, Serkey JM, Longworth DL, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM., 3rd Early onset prosthetic valve endocarditis: the cleveland clinic experience 1992–1997. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1388–92. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01135-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Akowuah EF, Davies W, Oliver S, Stephens J, Riaz I, Zadik P, et al. Prosthetic valve endocarditis: early and late outcome following medical or surgical treatment. Heart. 2003;89:269–72. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.3.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Alonso-Valle H, Fariñas-Alvarez C, García-Palomo JD, Bernal JM, Martín-Durán R, Gutiérrez Díez JF, et al. Clinical course and predictors of death in prosthetic valve endocarditis over a 20-year period. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:887–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.05.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Habib G, Tribouilloy C, Thuny F, Giorgi R, Brahim A, Amazouz M, et al. Prosthetic valve endocarditis: who needs surgery? A multicentre study of 104 cases. Heart. 2005;91:954–9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.046177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kuyvenhoven JP, van Rijk-Zwikker GL, Hermans J, Thompson J, Huysmans HA. Prosthetic valve endocarditis: analysis of risk factors for mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1994;8:420–4. doi: 10.1016/1010-7940(94)90083-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.López J, Revilla A, Vilacosta I, Villacorta E, González-Juanatey C, Gómez I, et al. Definition, clinical profile, microbiological spectrum, and prognostic factors of early-onset prosthetic valve endocarditis. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:760–5. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chirouze C, Cabell CH, Fowler VG, Jr, Khayat N, Olaison L, Miro JM, et al. Prognostic factors in 61 cases of staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve infective endocarditis from the international collaboration on endocarditis merged database. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1323–7. doi: 10.1086/383035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tornos P, Almirante B, Olona M, Permanyer G, González T, Carballo J, et al. Clinical outcome and long-term prognosis of late prosthetic valve endocarditis: a 20-year experience. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:381–6. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.3.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Truninger K, Jost C, Seifert B, Vogt P, Follath F, chaffner A, et al. Long term follow up of prosthetic valve endocarditis: what characteristics identify patients who were treated successfully with antibiotics alone? Heart. 1999;82:714–20. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.6.714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rekik S, Trabelsi I, Znazen A, Maaloul I, Hentati M, Frikha I, et al. Prosthetic valve endocarditis: management strategies and prognosis. Neth Heart J. 2009;17:56–60. doi: 10.1007/BF03086218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
