Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2012 Dec;50(12):4114–4115. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01553-12

Recovery of Bordetella pertussis from PCR-Positive Nasopharyngeal Samples Is Dependent on Bacterial Load

Didrik F Vestrheim a,, Martin Steinbakk a, Martha L Bjørnstad a, Amir Moghaddam b, Nils Reinton b, Mette L Dahl c, Nils Grude c, Per Sandven a
PMCID: PMC3502974  PMID: 23035189

Abstract

Viable Bordetella pertussis isolates are essential for surveillance purposes. We performed culture of 223 PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples. B. pertussis was recovered from 45 (20.2%) of the samples. Growth was associated with a high bacterial load, as determined by PCR. Culture from PCR-positive samples is a feasible approach to recover B. pertussis isolates, and culture can be limited to samples with a high bacterial load.

TEXT

Despite a continuous immunization program against pertussis (whooping cough) in Norway from 1952, the incidence of pertussis has increased in the past 2 decades (3). Mechanisms proposed as explanation for this include waning of immunity and vaccine-driven virulence evolution (7).

Real-time PCR has become the method of choice for detection of Bordetella pertussis in nasopharyngeal (NP) samples, making culture redundant (9). However, isolation of B. pertussis is of importance for epidemiologic purposes. Bacterial evolution under vaccine-induced immune pressure can be studied by characterization of B. pertussis isolates (4), and culture is essential for antimicrobial susceptibility testing and for understanding the public health implications of changes in the molecular epidemiology of B. pertussis.

Isolation of B. pertussis from NP swabs obtained for analysis by PCR is possible, and direct streaking onto charcoal agar plates in the diagnostic laboratory has been tried with success (Kees J. Heuvelman, personal communication). The aim of the present study was to obtain B. pertussis isolates from NP swabs at the reference laboratory for B. pertussis at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) with minimal extra labor imposed on the primary diagnostic laboratory; only samples that scored positive for B. pertussis by real-time PCR were forwarded to NIPH for plating and culture.

Two medical microbiology laboratories participated in the study: Fürst Medical Laboratory, Oslo (Lab 1), and the Department of Microbiology, Vestfold Hospital Trust (Lab 2). NP samples were obtained using a nylon flocked swab and transported in 1 ml of modified liquid Amies transport medium (ESwab; Copan Diagnostics, Inc., Corona, CA). DNA was extracted directly from 200 μl of transport medium using MagnaPure LC (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). In-house protocols for real-time PCR targeting insertion sequences (IS) were used—either IS481 alone (Lab 1) (2) or both IS481 and IS1001 (Lab 2) (6). Each laboratory used its own criteria to score a sample as positive. Among other criteria, Lab 1 scored samples with a threshold cycle (CT) value of <36 as positive, and samples with a CT value of 36 to 40 were retested for reproducibility before scoring as positive. In Lab II, the total number of cycles was 35. The assays were not further compared for the purpose of the present study. Samples scored as positive in the IS481 assay between 18 November 2011 and 13 February 2012 at Lab 1 and between 7 January 2012 and 7 February 2012 at Lab 2 were consecutively included in the study. The samples were kept refrigerated at 4°C and forwarded to NIPH once a week. All specimens were plated onto charcoal agar supplemented with defribrinated horse blood and cephalexin (8). Agar plates were incubated in humid air at 36°C for 7 days. Small, round colonies with a gray, pearly, and smooth appearance, suspected of being B. pertussis, were subcultivated and Gram stained. B. pertussis was confirmed by agglutination with specific antisera against Fim 2 and Fim 3 and a negative reaction with Bordetella parapertussis antiserum (in-house monoclonal antibodies).

The association of B. pertussis recovery with delay from sampling to plating and bacterial load (CT value) was studied by chi-square tests (SPSS 17.0). P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Overall, 223 specimens positive in the IS481 assay were received at NIPH: 169 from Lab I and 54 from Lab II. There was no significant difference between isolation rates from the two laboratories (data not shown). The age of the patients included in the study ranged from 0 to 83 years; the median age was 17 years. B. pertussis was successfully isolated from 45 (20.2%) of the samples: 20 isolates (44.4%) belonged to serotype 3, and 25 (55.6%) belonged to serotype 2. No agglutination was observed with B. parapertussis antiserum. The bacterial load, measured by CT value, was significantly associated with recovery of viable B. pertussis cells (P < 0.001) (Table 1). With an arbitrary cutoff set at a CT value of <30, the sensitivity of culture increased to 41 (50.1%) of 81 samples, while viable isolates were recovered from only 4 (2.8%) of 142 samples with a CT value of ≥30. The median delay from sampling to plating at NIPH was 3 days for both culture-negative and culture-positive samples, ranging from 1 to 17 days and 2 to 15 days, respectively. Ten (22.2%) of the 45 positive samples were plated more than 5 days after sampling. The recovery rate decreased after more than 5 days (Table 1), although not statistically significantly.

TABLE 1.

Growth of Bordetella pertussis from PCR-positive samples by CT value and delay from sampling to plating

CT valuea No. of samples culture positive/total (%)
Overall Delay to cultureb:
<5 days ≥5 days
<15 6/7 (86) 5/5 (100) 1/2 (50)
15–19 13/14 (93) 10/10 (100) 3/4 (75)
20–24 13/23 (56.5) 11/18 (61) 2/5 (40)
25–29 9/37 (24) 8/27 (30) 1/10 (10)
30–34 4/48 (8.3) 1/30 (3.3) 3/18 (17)
≥35 0/94 (0) 0/67 (0) 0/27 (0)
Total 45/223 (20) 35/157 (22) 10/66 (15)
a

CT, threshold cycle.

b

Shown is the number of days from nasopharyngeal sampling to plating onto charcoal agar.

The present study demonstrates that B. pertussis can successfully be isolated from NP samples obtained for PCR analysis. Viable isolates were recovered after transport of the original sample vial to the reference laboratory. Recovery was strongly associated with bacterial load, while delay from sampling to plating appeared to be less important. This is in accordance with a study by Halperin et al. (1) demonstrating prolonged survival of B. pertussis in phosphate-buffered saline.

The aim of the study was neither to determine the sensitivity of culture relative to real-time PCR nor to optimize a method for culture from NP swabs. More careful and rapid handling of NP samples and the use of more suitable transport media, such as Regan-Lowe, might have yielded more isolates. Furthermore, as DNA from nonviable bacteria might be detected in the PCR assay, isolation of viable bacteria cannot be expected from all PCR-positive samples. IS481 is a multicopy target, and false-positive reactions may occur due to the presence of IS481 in other Bordetella species, such as B. holmesii (5). Recent analysis has shown a low presence of B. holmesii and B. bronchiseptica species in this patient population (data not shown). The specificity of the diagnostic real-time PCR assays should be addressed in further studies.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that B. pertussis can survive for several days in modified liquid Amies transport medium following preimplemented sample collection procedures and that culture secondary to PCR is a feasible approach for obtaining B. pertussis isolates. The positivity rate appears to be sufficient for surveillance purposes when B. pertussis is endemic, and culture of B. pertussis for epidemiological purposes can be limited to selected PCR-positive samples.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 3 October 2012

REFERENCES

  • 1. Halperin S, Kasina A, Swift M. 1992. Prolonged survival of Bordetella pertussis in a simple buffer after nasopharyngeal secretion aspiration. Can. J. Microbiol. 38:1210–1213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kösters K, Riffelmann M, Wirsing von König CH. 2001. Evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for detection of Bordetella pertussis and B. parapertussis in clinical samples. J. Med. Microbiol. 50:436–440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lavine JS, Bjørnstad ON, de Blasio BF, Storsaeter J. 2012. Short-lived immunity against pertussis, age-specific routes of transmission, and the utility of a teenage booster vaccine. Vaccine 30:544–551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Litt DJ, Neal SE, Fry NK. 2009. Changes in genetic diversity of the Bordetella pertussis population in the United Kingdom between 1920 and 2006 reflect vaccination coverage and emergence of a single dominant clonal type. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:680–688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Loeffelholz M. 2012. Towards improved accuracy of Bordetella pertussis nucleic acid amplification tests. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:2186–2190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. McDonough EA, Barrozo CP, Russell KL, Metzgar D. 2005. A multiplex PCR for detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Bordetella pertussis in clinical specimens. Mol. Cell. Probes 19:314–322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Mooi FR. 2010. Bordetella pertussis and vaccination: the persistence of a genetically monomorphic pathogen. Infect. Genet. Evol. 10:36–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Regan J, Lowe F. 1977. Enrichment medium for the isolation of Bordetella. J. Clin. Microbiol. 6:303–309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zouari A, Smaoui H, Kechrid A. 2011. The diagnosis of pertussis: which method to choose? Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 38:111–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES