Abstract
The entry of the enveloped Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) into its host cell is mediated by the viral glycoproteins Gn and Gc. We investigated the RVFV entry process and, in particular, its pH-dependent activation mechanism using our recently developed nonspreading-RVFV-particle system. Entry of the virus into the host cell was efficiently inhibited by lysosomotropic agents that prevent endosomal acidification and by compounds that interfere with dynamin- and clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Exposure of plasma membrane-bound virions to an acidic pH (<pH 6) equivalent to the pH of late endolysosomal compartments allowed the virus to bypass the endosomal route of infection. Acid exposure of virions in the absence of target membranes triggered the class II-like Gc fusion protein to form extremely stable oligomers that were resistant to SDS and temperature dissociation and concomitantly compromised virus infectivity. By targeted mutagenesis of conserved histidines in Gn and Gc, we demonstrated that mutation of a single histidine (H857) in Gc completely abrogated virus entry, as well as acid-induced Gc oligomerization. In conclusion, our data suggest that after endocytic uptake, RVFV traffics to the acidic late endolysosomal compartments, where histidine protonation drives the reorganization of the Gc fusion protein that leads to membrane fusion.
INTRODUCTION
Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) is an emerging pathogen that affects ruminants and humans and is transmitted between susceptible hosts by different species of mosquitoes. RVFV was first isolated in Kenya in 1930 and has since spread throughout the African continent and the Arabian Peninsula (12, 46). An outbreak of RVFV can have a devastating socioeconomic impact on the region (2, 18, 50) and is characterized by abortion storms in adult livestock and high mortality among newborns. Humans can also be infected through contact with infected tissues or via mosquito bites, typically causing a self-limiting febrile illness. A small percentage of human infections result in hemorrhagic fever or encephalitis with generally fatal outcome (41).
RVFV belongs to the Phlebovirus genus of the Bunyaviridae family, which comprises four additional genera (Orthobunyavirus, Hantavirus, Nairovirus, and Tospovirus). Members of the Bunyaviridae family are enveloped viruses of ∼100 nm in size that have a tripartite negative-strand RNA genome which is replicated in the cytoplasm. The genomic segments are encapsidated by the nucleocapsid protein, forming the ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) (56). The lipid envelope surrounding the RNPs contains an ordered shell made up by units of two glycoproteins, Gn and Gc (20). These glycoproteins are responsible for entry into the host cell, but their precise functional roles in receptor binding and fusion are poorly understood. Gn and Gc are type I membrane glycoproteins which form heterodimers after posttranslational processing of a glycoprotein precursor in the endoplasmic reticulum. By virtue of a Golgi localization signal in Gn, the Gn-Gc heterodimers are targeted to the Golgi apparatus (56, 65). Here, interaction between the Gn carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic tail and the RNPs allows virus budding into the lumen of the Golgi cisternae (45, 47, 56). In the case of the RVFV virion, a 78-kDa protein consisting of pre-Gn and Gn regions has been identified as a third but minor structural component (27, 60). Cryoelectron microscopy studies of RVFV virions showed that the viral envelope comprises 720 heterodimers of Gn (54 kDa) and Gc (56 kDa), forming 110 cylinder-shaped hexamers and 12 pentamers according to a T=12 icosahedral lattice (13, 24).
Enveloped viruses carry dedicated proteins in their envelope which mediate fusion between viral and cellular membranes, allowing translocation of the viral genome into the cytoplasm. This membrane fusion process is driven by structural rearrangements in the metastable viral fusion protein which are triggered by receptor binding, proteolytic cleavage, or the acidic pH of endosomes, allowing fusion to occur at the right time and place (8). Viral fusion proteins have been divided into three classes (classes I, II, and III) based on their structural features (67). The Gc glycoprotein of bunyaviruses has been proposed to be a class II viral fusion protein (15, 53). Similar to class II fusion proteins of alphaviruses and flaviviruses, Gc is predicted to be mainly composed of β-sheet structures, is synthesized from a polyprotein downstream of a companion protein (Gn), and assembles into a heterodimer in the ER (15, 48, 62, 63).
Common to all class II fusion proteins is that they utilize the low pH in the acidified endosome to activate their fusion process. Low pH triggers the dissociation of the glycoprotein dimeric state, resulting in the exposure and subsequent insertion of a highly hydrophobic stretch of amino acids. Insertion of this fusion peptide into the target membrane is followed by trimerization of the monomeric fusion proteins. A stable trimeric hairpin structure is subsequently formed which brings together the fusion peptide and transmembrane domain at one end of the molecule, mediating the fusion of the cellular and viral membrane. While the acid-induced conformational changes of class II viral fusion proteins have been well documented (for an comprehensive review, see reference 30), the mechanism of low-pH triggering is not well understood. Protonation of histidines has been suggested to act as a molecular switch that triggers the activity of pH-activated viral fusion proteins (4, 28). The rationale for this hypothesis is that histidine is the only amino acid residue with a side chain pKa value (pKa 6.4) within the pH range found in the endolysosomal pathway (pH 4.5 to 6.5) (28, 54). Evidence in support of a crucial role for histidine protonation in promoting fusion protein rearrangements leading to fusion has been obtained for a number of low-pH-dependent viruses (3, 4, 6, 14, 26, 34, 36, 49, 57, 61).
Knowledge of the fusion mechanism of bunyaviruses is still in its infancy. In agreement with a class II virus classification, bunyaviruses appear to have an acid-dependent fusion machinery. Exposure of cells overexpressing RVFV Gn and Gc to low pH results in the formation of multinucleated cells (11). Acid-induced syncytium formation has also been reported for other members of the Bunyaviridae family, including Uukuniemi virus (UUKV, Phlebovirus genus), La Crosse virus (Orthobunyavirus genus), and Hantaan virus (Hantavirus genus) (1, 39, 42, 48). In accordance with the hypothesis of acid-induced fusion activation, bunyaviruses are sensitive to acidotropic agents which raise the pH of intracellular endocytic compartments (55, 58). In addition, acid exposure of plasma membrane-bound UUKV could bypass the endosomal acidic pH requirement needed for infection (39).
In this study, we have examined the entry mechanism of RVFV. Studies of natural RVFV strains have been hampered by the requirement of handling the virus under biosafety level 3 (BSL3) containment. We have taken advantage of our recently established nonspreading-RVFV (RVFVns) production system, which can be handled outside BSL3 containment (33). This system allows the efficient production of RVFV particles upon transfection of a single Gn/Gc expression plasmid into a replicon cell line which maintains the replication machinery of RVFV. The expression of the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) gene from the viral genome enables infection to be easily monitored. Most importantly, the system greatly facilitates Gn and Gc structure/function studies as long as particle assembly is not compromised. Using RVFVns, we have examined the endocytic uptake of the virus, the low-pH dependence and kinetics of virus entry, and the effects of low-pH treatment of the virus on infectivity and rearrangement of the glycoproteins, as well as the role of conserved histidines in Gn and Gc in virus entry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells and viruses.
BHK cells were grown in Glasgow minimum essential medium (GMEM; Invitrogen) supplemented with 4% tryptose phosphate broth, 1% minimum essential medium nonessential amino acids (MEM NEAA; Invitrogen), and 5% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum (FCS; Bodinco). For maintenance of BHK-Rep2 cells (33), geneticin (G-418) was used at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. A549 and CHO K1 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Lonza Biowhittaker) and Ham's F-12K medium (Invitrogen), respectively, supplemented with 10% FCS. Cells were grown at 37°C and 5% CO2. Drosophila Schneider (S2) cells (Invitrogen) were grown at 27°C in serum-free InsectXpress medium (Lonza). Recombinant RVFV (RVFVrec) and RVFVns have both been rescued from cDNA as described previously (33). VSV-ΔG/GFP/G* is a recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) whose glycoprotein gene has been replaced by the GFP gene. The virus was pseudotyped with its authentic glycoprotein G as described previously (5).
Plasmids.
The QuikChange XL site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol to exchange specific histidine for alanine codons in the pCAGGS-M expression plasmid (33) at amino acid positions 157, 540, 572, 580, 778, 836, 857, and 1087 of the RVFV M segment (GenBank sequence accession number JF784387). The recombinant plasmids were sequenced to confirm that only the desired mutations were present.
To generate a stable Drosophila S2 cell line expressing the Gc ectodomain (Gce) of RVFV (GenBank sequence accession number JF784387), a truncated version of the Gn-Gc coding sequence lacking the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of Gc (GnGce; 153-AEDPHL/FGGPLK-1158) was cloned into the pMT/BiP/V5-HisA (Invitrogen) expression vector downstream from the BiP-encoding signal sequence. A quadruple Strep tag-encoding sequence separated by glycine linkers [DPTGWSHPQFEK(GGGSGGGSGGGSWSHPQFEK)3] was appended C terminally to allow purification of the secreted Gc ectodomain from the culture supernatant using Strep-Tactin Sepharose affinity chromatography (IBA GmbH). Stable S2 cell lines were generated according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen) with minor modifications. S2 cells were transfected with the expression vector and pCoBlast plasmid in a 1:19 ratio. Stable cell lines were subsequently selected at 27°C in serum-free InsectXpress medium containing 25 μg/ml blasticidin-S-HCl (Invitrogen) and maintained in this culture medium in the presence of 10 μg/ml blasticidin-S-HCl.
Production of polyclonal antiserum against Gc ectodomain.
Polyclonal antibodies were raised against the Gc ectodomain after immunization of rabbits (Davids Biotechnologie). Rabbits were immunized at days 0, 14, and 21 with ∼40 μg of Strep tag-purified Gc ectodomain. Total serum was collected at day 35.
Chemicals.
Bafilomycin A1, dynasore, cytochalasin D, nystatin (Sigma), and dyngo-4a (Abcam) were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Chlorpromazine and ammonium chloride (Sigma) were prepared in distilled sterile water. Diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC; Sigma) was dissolved in 96% ethanol.
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).
Flow cytometry was performed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton, Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems). For the analysis of the data, Cyflogic 1.2.1 software was used.
Fluorescence microscopy.
Fluorescence microscopy on living or fixed cells (fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature) was performed on the EVOS fl microscope (AMG). Nuclei of fixated cells were stained with 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI).
Production of RVFVns particles.
RVFVns particles were produced as described previously (33). In short, BHK-rep2 cells (33) were seeded in Opti-Mem medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 2% FCS. Cells were transfected (JetPEI; Polyplus) with pCAGGS-M (or derivatives thereof) in Opti-Mem containing 0.2% FCS. Twenty hours posttransfection, the RVFVns particles in the collected medium were concentrated and transferred into a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or HNE (5 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA) buffer, pH 7.4, using Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters (Millipore) with a molecular mass cutoff of 100,000 kDa (Millipore). Titers of RVFVns stocks were determined by 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) analysis as described previously (33).
Inhibition of RVFV infection by pharmacological drugs.
To analyze the effects of specific drugs on RVFV entry, BHK-21 cells were pretreated for 1 h with ammonium chloride, chlorpromazine (both dissolved in water), bafilomycin A1, cytochalasin D, dynasore, dyngo-4a, or nystatin (the latter five dissolved in DMSO). Cells were inoculated for 2 h with RVFVns or VSVns (VSVΔG-GFP/G*) (multiplicity of infection [MOI] of ∼0.4) at 37°C before the culture medium was replaced with medium containing 10 or 40 nM bafilomycin A1, respectively. Cells were further incubated at 37°C. The inhibitory effects of the compounds on virus replication were tested by the addition of the chemicals 2 h postinfection (h.p.i.). After a period of 3 h, the drug-containing medium was replaced with culture medium containing bafilomycin (10 nM). RVFVns or VSVns infection was quantified at 20 or 8 h after virus inoculation, respectively, by analysis of GFP-expressing cells using FACS or fluorescence microscopy. The viability of the drug-treated cells was measured using a WST-1 assay (Roche) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Ammonium chloride add-in time course.
Infection was synchronized by allowing RVFVns particles to bind to cells on ice for 1 h in serum-free medium. The cells were washed with cold medium to remove unbound virus and subsequently transferred rapidly to a 37°C water bath after the addition of serum-free prewarmed Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium (RPMI 1640; Invitrogen) adjusted at different pHs. Ammonium chloride (10 mM) was added to the medium at the indicated times. Infection (GFP-positive cells) was quantified by FACS and fluorescence microscopy at 18 h after warming.
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Western blotting, and dot blot analysis.
Samples containing RVFVns particles were heated for 10 min at 40 to 80°C in Laemmli sample buffer lacking β-mercaptoethanol (LSB−) and loaded onto NuPAGE bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen). After separation, proteins were blotted onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. Western blot analysis was performed using a rabbit Gc peptide antiserum (9), a rabbit polyclonal antiserum against Gce (see above), the 4-D4 mouse anti-Gn monoclonal antibody (provided by Connie Schmaljohn, USAMRIID) (29), or a sheep polyclonal antiserum against RVFV (32) as the primary antibody and an appropriate peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. For dot blot analysis, samples containing RVFVns particles were heated for 20 min at 80°C and spotted onto nitrocellulose membrane (Whatmann). The membrane was blocked with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (vol/vol) and 5% Protifar (wt/vol; Nutricia). RVFVns particles were detected using the 4-D4 anti-Gn monoclonal antibody.
Fusion at the plasma membrane.
RVFVns particles were allowed to bind to a confluent layer of BHK-21 cells on ice for 2 h. Cell-bound virus was subsequently exposed to prewarmed RPMI 1640 medium for 3 min at 37°C (water bath). The pH of the culture medium varied from pH 7.4 to 5.0. The RPMI medium was replaced by culture medium containing bafilomycin A1 (20 nM), and cells were further incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2. Twenty hours after the 3-min pH shock, infection (GFP-positive cells) was quantified by FACS and fluorescence microscopy.
Low-pH treatment of RVFVns particles.
RVFVns particles in HNE buffer, pH 7.4, were exposed to conditions ranging from pH 7.4 to 5.0 by the addition of a pretitrated volume of 100 mM MES (morpholineethanesulfonic acid; pH 6.5 to 5.3) or 200 mM acetic acid (pH 5.0). The particles were incubated for 3 min at the desired pH at 37°C before the samples were back-neutralized to pH 7.4 with 0.1 N NaOH. Samples were subsequently used to infect BHK-21 cells, and the infections were analyzed 20 h.p.i. by FACS and fluorescence microscopy. To analyze the effect of low-pH treatment on the structural glycoproteins Gn and Gc, the pH of HNE-buffered RVFVns particles was varied from pH 7.4 to 4.25 by the addition of MES (pH 6.5 to 5.3), 200 mM HAc (pH 5.0 to 4.75), or 500 mM HAc (pH 4.5 to 4.25). The RVFVns particles were incubated for 0 to 10 min at 37°C, and the buffer was subsequently returned to pH 7.4 by adding a predetermined amount of 0.1 N NaOH or 0.5 N NaOH (pH 4.25). Samples were analyzed by Western blotting as described above.
DEPC treatment of RVFVns particles.
A diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) solution (1 M) in 96% ethanol was freshly prepared from a 1.12-g/ml commercial stock (Sigma). RVFVns particles in PBS were incubated with various concentrations of DEPC as indicated for 10 min at 37°C. BHK-21 cells were inoculated with the treated virus for 20 h and assayed for infection (GFP-positive cells) by FACS and fluorescence microscopy.
Statistics.
The data are representative of multiple independent experiments. Values are shown as means ± standard deviations (SD). Standard deviations were calculated using GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software).
RESULTS
Entry of RVFV by endocytic uptake.
We started our studies on RVFV cell entry with a limited pharmacological drug screen to investigate the uptake of the virus into cells using established inhibitors of cellular endocytic pathways. BHK-21 cells were pretreated for 1 h with different concentrations of drugs that interfere with dynamin-2- (dynasore), caveolin- (nystatin), clathrin- (chlorpromazine), or actin- (cytochalasin D) dependent endocytosis. Cells were then inoculated with nonspreading RVFV (RVFVns) at an MOI of ∼0.4 in the presence of the drugs and subsequently incubated without the drugs but in the presence of bafilomycin A1 to inhibit further infection (Fig. 1A). A nonspreading recombinant of VSV (VSVΔG-GFP/G* [VSVns]) was used as a control virus (5). Both viruses express GFP from the viral genome, facilitating quantification of infection. Treatment of BHK-21 cells with dynasore or chlorpromazine, but not with the other compounds tested, reduced RVFV infection considerably, more strongly even than they affected VSV infection, which is well known to be dependent on dynamin-2 and clathrin during entry (Fig. 1A). The presence of these drugs did not have a significant effect on the cell viability (Fig. 1B). Importantly, infection of RVFVns was hardly affected if dynasore or chlorpromazine was added 2 h postinoculation, indicating that the drugs only affect the entry stage of infection (Fig. 1C). Similar effects of dynasore and chlorpromazine on RVFVns infection were seen on A549 cells (data not shown). We confirmed the involvement of dynamin-2 in RVFVns entry on BHK-21 cells using a novel and potent inhibitor of dynamin-2 named dyngo-4a (23) (Fig. 1B and D). Dynasore and chlorpromazine also strongly inhibited entry of a recombinant RVFV, RVFVrec, expressing GFP (Fig. 1E). These drug inhibition data indicate that entry of RVFV is sensitive to inhibitors which interfere with dynamin-2 and clathrin-dependent endocytosis.
RVFV entry depends on vacuolar acidification.
Previously, it was described that low-pH incubation of cells overexpressing the RVFV glycoproteins resulted in extensive cell-cell fusion, suggesting that after endocytosis, RVFV fusion is activated by the acidic environment of endosomal compartments (11, 37). To explore the requirements of a low endosomal pH for virus entry, we analyzed the infection of RVFVns in the presence of the lysosomotropic agents bafilomycin A1, an inhibitor of vacuolar-type H+-ATPase proton pumps, and the lipophilic weak base ammonium chloride (NH4Cl), both of which prevent acidification of endosomal compartments. VSVns, known to be acid activated in early endosomes with a pH threshold of pH 6.1 (35, 68), was used as a control. The results demonstrate that RVFVns entry is strictly dependent on vacuolar acidification, as infection of BHK-21 and A549 cells was inhibited by bafilomycin A1, as well as by NH4Cl (Fig. 2A). Compared to VSVns, RVFVns appears to be more sensitive to the lysosomotropic agents, suggesting that the virus has a lower pH threshold for activation and therefore may be activated in more-acidic vacuoles beyond the early endosomal compartments.
To define the time of acid exposure after receptor binding, we used a previously described NH4Cl add-in experiment (40). The addition of NH4Cl to the medium is known to almost instantly raise the endosomal pH (43), allowing studies of the kinetics by which viruses pass the acid-requiring entry step after binding. We synchronized the infection of RVFVns by allowing the virus to bind to cells in the cold. After removal of the unbound virus, we rapidly transferred the cells to 37°C and added 10 mM NH4Cl at different times after warming. About 90% of the virus experienced the acid-dependent step between 4 and 48 min after warming of the cells (Fig. 2B). The entry kinetics of RVFVns are similar to those reported for the Phlebovirus UUKV (39) and influenza viruses (40), which were both shown to fuse at low pH in late endosomal or lysosomal compartments (38, 39, 69).
RVFV fusion occurs under acidic conditions that resemble the endolysosomal compartments.
To determine the pH threshold for fusion of RVFV, we measured infection after low-pH-induced fusion at the plasma membrane under conditions where acidification of endosomes—and normal virus entry—is blocked by bafilomycin A1. In this acid-mediated endocytosis bypass experiment, which was previously described for SFV and UUKV (19, 39), RVFVns particles were bound to cells in the cold and subsequently exposed for 3 min at 37°C to media with various pHs. The medium was replaced with culture medium containing bafilomycin A1 to inhibit further infection via the endocytic pathway. The results demonstrate that treatment of the cell-bound virus at or below pH 5.5 fully bypassed the requirement for vacuolar acidification (Fig. 3A). The bypass was less efficient at pH 5.7, and only limited infection was observed at pH 6 or higher, indicating that the pH threshold for RVFV membrane fusion is around pH 5.7. Exposure of free RVFVns particles to low pH (pH 6.5 to 5) for 3 min did reduce virus infectivity, although virus inactivation was not complete (Fig. 3B).
Acid-induced rearrangement of the Gc into higher-order structures.
Next, we examined the effects of exposure to low pH on the structural organization of the RVFV envelope glycoproteins. RVFVns particles were incubated in buffers of low pH for 10 min. After neutralization of the buffers, viral proteins were analyzed by Western blotting performed under nonreducing conditions. The Gn and Gc glycoproteins, as well as the 78-kDa protein, were detected using a polyclonal RVFV antiserum, a Gn-specific monoclonal antibody, and a Gc-specific peptide antiserum (Fig. 4A). Incubation of RVFVns under the low-pH conditions that activate virus entry (pH < 6) (Fig. 3A) led to the disappearance of the Gc monomer and the concomitant appearance of a more slowly migrating protein moiety. Incubation at low pH did not influence migration of the Gn or the 78-kDa protein. The disappearance of the Gc monomer suggested that the slowly migrating band consists of an oligomer of Gc which can be detected by the polyclonal RVFV antiserum but, perhaps through epitope inaccessibility, not by the Gc peptide antiserum. Consistent with this notion, heating of acid-activated RVFVns to 90°C resulted in the disappearance of the slowly migrating band and the simultaneous appearance of monomeric Gc (Fig. 4B). To further study the identity of the presumed Gc oligomer, we produced a polyclonal antiserum by inoculating rabbits with the ectodomain of Gc produced using the Drosophila expression system. This antiserum efficiently recognized the monomeric and the more slowly migrating form of Gc on Western blots, confirming the identity of the Gc oligomer (Fig. 4C). Using this antiserum, we analyzed the kinetics of Gc oligomer formation. The conversion of Gc into SDS-stable oligomers slowly increased with time of pH treatment (Fig. 4C). Conversion became detectable already after 15 s and was nearly complete after 4 min of incubation at low pH. These results demonstrate that incubation of RVFV at the fusion-activating pH triggers a structural reorganization of Gc from an apparently metastable to a highly stable oligomeric conformation, reminiscent of the stable acid-activated trimeric class II fusion proteins of alpha- and flaviviruses (31, 59, 64).
RVFV entry is inhibited by substitution of a single histidine in Gc.
Protonation of one or more histidines can be crucial for triggering conformational changes in viral fusion proteins (28). A first clue for a pH-sensing role of histidines in RVFV infection came from the observation that preincubation of RVFVns with diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC), a chemical which specifically modifies the aromatic ring of histidines, preventing its protonation (7), clearly inhibits RVFV infection of BHK-21 cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). To further study the role of histidine protonation in virus entry, we identified and replaced eight conserved histidines in Gn and Gc (Table 1 and Fig. 5B) with the small and nonpolar amino acid alanine. RVFVns particles carrying the histidine-to-alanine replacements were produced and secreted from BHK-21 replicon cells (33) with efficiencies resembling that of wild-type RVFVns, indicating that the mutations in Gn and Gc did not impair the assembly and release of virus particles (data not shown). The amounts of mutant and wild-type virus particles were normalized using a dot blot assay, and equal virus quantities were compared for their relative infectivities (Fig. 5C). RVFVns mutants with histidine-to-alanine substitutions in Gn were all viable, although their infectivity was slightly reduced. In contrast, three of the four histidine-to-alanine substitutions in Gc either completely abolished (H857A mutant) or strongly impaired infectivity (H778A and H1087A mutants), to less than 5% relative to that of wild-type RVFVns.
TABLE 1.
Phlebovirus (GenBank accession no.) | Amino acid at indicated positiona in: |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gn protein |
Gc protein |
|||||||
157 | 540 | 572 | 580 | 778 | 836 | 857 | 1087 | |
Rift Valley fever virus (JF784387) | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
Sandfly fever Naples virus (YP089671) | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
Toscana virus (ABS85173) | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
Massilia virus (ACI24011) | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
Echarate virus (HM119411) | H | Y | Y | H | H | H | H | H |
Turuna virus (HM119432) | H | H | N | H | H | H | H | H |
Chandiru virus (HM119408) | H | H | N | H | H | H | H | H |
Mucura virus (HM119420) | H | H | Q | H | H | H | H | H |
Ariquemes virus (HM119405) | H | H | S | H | H | H | H | H |
Morumbi virus (HM119423) | H | H | T | H | H | H | H | H |
Alenquer virus (HM119402) | H | H | K | H | H | H | H | H |
Itaituba virus (HM119417) | H | H | K | H | H | H | H | H |
Serra Norte virus (HM119429) | H | Y | K | H | H | H | H | H |
Nique virus (HM119426) | H | H | N | H | H | H | H | H |
Oriximina virus (HM119435) | H | Y | H | H | H | H | H | H |
Jacunda virus (HM466935) | H | Y | Y | H | H | H | H | H |
Sandfly fever Sicilian virus (AAA75043) | H | H | E | H | R | H | H | H |
Punta Toro virus (ABD92923) | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (HM745931) | — | H | E | Y | R | R | P | S |
Uukuniemi virus (AAA79512) | — | R | A | F | H | R | Y | H |
Amino acid numbers correspond to the RVFV M-segment encoding polyprotein. —, ClustalW alignment displays a gap at this position.
H857 is essential for acid-induced rearrangement of Gc into higher-order structures.
Next, we analyzed the effects of the histidine-to-alanine mutations on the formation, stability, and conversion kinetics of the Gc oligomer. Acid exposure of similar amounts of mutant and wild-type RVFVns particles resulted in the formation of the SDS-resistant Gc oligomer in all mutants, with the exception of the H857A mutant (Fig. 6A, upper left). The Gc oligomers of the H778A, H836A, and H1087A mutants were not stable at 80°C, in contrast to those of the wild type and the Gn histidine mutants (Fig. 6A, lower left). To analyze their thermostability in more detail, the Gc oligomers were subjected to heating at different temperatures prior to Western blot analysis. Compared to the wild-type oligomer, the Gc oligomers of the H778A, H836A, and H1087A mutants appeared slightly less thermostable and dissociated at 80°C but not at 70°C (Fig. 6A, right). Next, we used Western blotting to assess the effects of the mutations on the kinetics of the Gc conversion into the SDS-stable oligomer upon acid exposure (Fig. 6B). The conversion kinetics of the Gc H778A, H836A, and H1087A mutants upon pH treatment appeared grossly similar to that of the wild type (Fig. 6B). Clearly, acid exposure of the Gc mutant carrying the lethal H857A substitution even up to 30 min did not allow the formation of the SDS-resistant Gc oligomer (Fig. 6B), suggesting that the formation of the stable Gc oligomer induced by protonation of histidine 857 is essential for virus entry into the host cell. Finally, to assess a possible shift in the pH activation threshold, we analyzed the Gc conversion for the H857A Gc mutant and wild-type RVFVns particles at pH values below pH 5.5. Incubation under these acidic conditions for 10 min at 37°C resulted in the formation of the stable oligomer in wild-type RVFVns particles. In contrast, no stable Gc oligomer was observed after treatment of RVFVns particles containing the H857A mutation (Fig. 6C).
DISCUSSION
It is well established that bunyaviruses require the acidic pH found in endosomes to activate fusion, but it remains unclear how fusion is mediated at the molecular level. In this study, we demonstrate that exposure of RVFV particles to acidic pH converts the viral Gc protein into a highly stable oligomer. The pH required for this major conformational change correlates with the pH threshold required to activate fusion of virus particles at the plasma membrane. Mutagenesis of conserved histidines in the viral glycoproteins identified a single histidine in Gc that was strictly required for entry, as well as for the acid-induced conversion of Gc into its stable oligomeric form. These data provide new insight into the molecular basis of acid-activated bunyavirus fusion.
Most bunyaviruses studied to date utilize clathrin-mediated endocytosis to gain access to the cell interior (22, 25, 38, 39, 55, 58). For UUKV, a clathrin-independent pathway has been suggested as an alternative route (39). We demonstrate here that RVFV entry is sensitive to drugs perturbing the function of clathrin and dynamin, which is consistent with entry via a clathrin-mediated endocytic pathway. Further studies are required to confirm this assumption. Upon endocytosis, RVFV particles are transported deep into the cell through maturing endosomes. The pH threshold (pH < 6) required for virus fusion at the plasma membrane and rearrangement of Gc suggests that fusion of RVFV occurs in late endosomes. This late penetration is consistent with the time at which 50% of the total amount of infection has been reached (half-time) of RVFV of ∼20 min during which the virus undergoes its acid-activating step. Similar pH thresholds and penetration kinetics have been observed for UUKV, another Phlebovirus (39). Our data indicate that RVFV can be classified as a late-penetrating virus (38).
Exposure to low pH converts the RVFVns Gc protein from an apparently metastable to a highly stable oligomeric conformation. Similar pH-induced rearrangements have been reported for envelope glycoproteins of other bunyaviruses. These conformational changes have variously been shown to lead to dissociation of the Gn-Gc heterodimer (Hantavirus), to changes in the Gc antigenic structure, or to alteration in the cleavage pattern after proteolytic processing of the Gc protein (UUKV and La Crosse virus) (16, 21, 52). The low-pH-induced changes in the glycoprotein shell of UUKV virions have been visualized nicely by electron microscopy, revealing the flattening of the glycoprotein capsomers (44, 52). Low-pH incubation of La Crosse virus and UUKV leads to virus aggregation (44, 66). Activation of fusion proteins generally triggers the exposure of a hydrophobic “fusion peptide” which normally functions by inserting into the host membrane and initiating fusion, which might explain the observed acid-induced virus aggregation. Typically, fusion proteins are trimeric in this fusion-active state (8, 17). Hence, we assume that the RVFV Gc stable oligomer is also made up of three Gc molecules, but further research is needed to confirm this hypothesis.
The acid-induced Gc oligomer displays a remarkable resistance to temperature dissociation and SDS detergent denaturation (10). In agreement with these observations, back-neutralization of the acid-exposed virus particles did not reverse the transition of Gc into a stable oligomer. In general, viral fusion proteins convert to a stable form during fusion, thereby generating the energy needed for membrane coalescence. For class I and II viral fusion proteins, this transition was shown to be irreversible (51). Intriguingly, exposure of virus to the activating pH in the absence of target membranes also fully converts Gc into the stable oligomer; however, although a reduction is seen, it does not completely inactivate virus infectivity even after incubation times of up to 16 min (data not shown). It remains to be seen whether the stable Gc oligomer represents the final postfusion form of the Gc fusion protein or represents a crucial intermediate which awaits further reorganization. In the latter situation, alternative factors (e.g., interaction with the target membrane) may be required to drive the conformational rearrangements to completion.
In the RVFV virion, Gc is organized as a heterodimer together with Gn (24). The Gn-Gc heterodimer is the building block of 110 hexamers and 12 pentamers containing six and five of the Gn-Gc heterodimeric units, respectively. Together, these 122 capsomers make up the icosahedral shell of the virion, following a T = 12 triangulation (13, 24). Exposure of virions to the activating pH will lead to rearrangement of the metastable Gn-Gc heterodimer and concomitantly enforce the interactions between Gc subunits, resulting in the formation of a Gc homooligomer. Exposure of virions to the acidic pH of 6 did not have any impact on the structure of RVFV particles as shown by cryoelectron tomography, consistent with the fusion-activating pH threshold of below 6 that we observed (24). It will be interesting to investigate how the Gc protomers in the virions—organized as pentamers and hexameric Gn-Gc heterodimers—collectively undergo the structural transition toward the (presumably) trimeric Gc oligomer after exposure to the activating pH.
Protonation of histidines in Gc may play a key role at different stages of the fusion process. The inability of the H857A mutant to form stable Gc oligomers, in combination with its abrogated entry function, suggests that Gc oligomerization is essential for virus entry and that protonation of H857 plays a crucial role in this process. In addition, the substitution of H778 and H1087 in Gc has a severe effect on virus entry, yet Gc oligomerization still occurred and the temperature stability was only marginally affected. This suggests that formation of the Gc oligomer, although required, may not be sufficient for inducing fusion. We speculate that the single mutations may impair a later step in the fusion reaction (36). The H778, H857, and H1087 histidines in Gc may collectively contribute to pH sensing, initiation, and propagation of conformational rearrangements toward the postfusion structure. Further interpretation of the consequences of the histidine substitutions awaits the elucidation of the high-resolution structures of the Gc protein in its pre- and postfusion states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Rianka Vloet and Nadia Oreshkova (Central Veterinary Institute, Lelystad, The Netherlands) for their assistance. We thank Christiaan Potgieter (ARC-OVI) for providing the 841 antiserum. We thank Sean Whelan and Matthijs Raaben (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) for providing the VSVΔG-GFP recombinant virus. We thank Connie Schmaljohn (USAMRIID, Fort Detrick, MD) for providing the 4-D4 monoclonal antibody recognizing Gn.
This work was supported by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation, project codes KB-12-004.02-002 and BO-10-001-211.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 3 October 2012
REFERENCES
- 1. Arikawa J, Takashima I, Hashimoto N. 1985. Cell fusion by haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) viruses and its application for titration of virus infectivity and neutralizing antibody. Arch. Virol. 86:303–313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Balkhy HH, Memish ZA. 2003. Rift Valley fever: an uninvited zoonosis in the Arabian peninsula. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 21:153–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Boo I, KteWierik Douam F, Lavillette D, Poumbourios P, Drummer HE. 2012. Distinct roles in folding, CD81 receptor binding and viral entry for conserved histidine residues of hepatitis C virus glycoprotein E1 and E2. Biochem. J. 443:85–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Carneiro FA, et al. 2003. Membrane fusion induced by vesicular stomatitis virus depends on histidine protonation. J. Biol. Chem. 278:13789–13794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Chandran K, Sullivan NJ, Felbor U, Whelan SP, Cunningham JM. 2005. Endosomal proteolysis of the Ebola virus glycoprotein is necessary for infection. Science 308:1643–1645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Chanel-Vos C, Kielian M. 2006. Second-site revertants of a Semliki Forest virus fusion-block mutation reveal the dynamics of a class II membrane fusion protein. J. Virol. 80:6115–6122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chang LH, Tam MF. 1993. Site-directed mutagenesis and chemical modification of histidine residues on an alpha-class chick liver glutathione S-transferase CL 3-3. Histidines are not needed for the activity of the enzyme and diethylpyrocarbonate modifies both histidine and lysine residues. Eur. J. Biochem. 211:805–811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Cosset FL, Lavillette D. 2011. Cell entry of enveloped viruses. Adv. Genet. 73:121–183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. de Boer SM, et al. 2010. Rift Valley fever virus subunit vaccines confer complete protection against a lethal virus challenge. Vaccine 28:2330–2339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Fass D. 2003. Conformational changes in enveloped virus surface proteins during cell entry. Adv. Protein Chem. 64:325–362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Filone CM, Heise M, Doms RW, Bertolotti-Ciarlet A. 2006. Development and characterization of a Rift Valley fever virus cell-cell fusion assay using alphavirus replicon vectors. Virology 356:155–164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Findlay GM, Daubney R. 1931. The virus of Rift Valley fever or enzoötic hepatitis. Lancet ii:1350–1351 [Google Scholar]
- 13. Freiberg AN, Sherman MB, Morais MC, Holbrook MR, Watowich SJ. 2008. Three-dimensional organization of Rift Valley fever virus revealed by cryoelectron tomography. J. Virol. 82:10341–10348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fritz R, Stiasny K, Heinz FX. 2008. Identification of specific histidines as pH sensors in flavivirus membrane fusion. J. Cell Biol. 183:353–361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Garry CE, Garry RF. 2004. Proteomics computational analyses suggest that the carboxyl terminal glycoproteins of Bunyaviruses are class II viral fusion protein (beta-penetrenes). Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 1:10 doi:10.1186/1742-4682-1-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Gonzalez-Scarano F. 1985. La Crosse virus G1 glycoprotein undergoes a conformational change at the pH of fusion. Virology 140:209–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Harrison SC. 2008. Viral membrane fusion. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15:690–698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hartley DM, et al. 2011. Potential effects of Rift Valley fever in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17:e1 doi:10.3201/eid1708.101088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Helenius A, Kartenbeck J, Simons K, Fries E. 1980. On the entry of Semliki forest virus into BHK-21 cells. J. Cell Biol. 84:404–420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hepojoki J, Strandin T, Lankinen H, Vaheri A. 2012. Hantavirus structure—molecular interactions behind the scene. J. Gen. Virol. 93(Pt 8):1631–1644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hepojoki J, Strandin T, Vaheri A, Lankinen H. 2010. Interactions and oligomerization of hantavirus glycoproteins. J. Virol. 84:227–242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hollidge BS, et al. 2012. Orthobunyavirus entry into neurons and other mammalian cells occurs via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and requires trafficking into early endosomes. J. Virol. 86:7988–8001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Howes MT, et al. 2010. Clathrin-independent carriers form a high capacity endocytic sorting system at the leading edge of migrating cells. J. Cell Biol. 190:675–691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Huiskonen JT, Overby AK, Weber F, Grunewald K. 2009. Electron cryo-microscopy and single-particle averaging of Rift Valley fever virus: evidence for GN-GC glycoprotein heterodimers. J. Virol. 83:3762–3769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Jin M, et al. 2002. Hantaan virus enters cells by clathrin-dependent receptor-mediated endocytosis. Virology 294:60–69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kadlec J, Loureiro S, Abrescia NG, Stuart DI, Jones IM. 2008. The postfusion structure of baculovirus gp64 supports a unified view of viral fusion machines. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15:1024–1030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kakach LT, Wasmoen TL, Collett MS. 1988. Rift Valley fever virus M segment: use of recombinant vaccinia viruses to study Phlebovirus gene expression. J. Virol. 62:826–833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kampmann T, Mueller DS, Mark AE, Young PR, Kobe B. 2006. The role of histidine residues in low-pH-mediated viral membrane fusion. Structure 14:1481–1487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Keegan K, Collett MS. 1986. Use of bacterial expression cloning to define the amino acid sequences of antigenic determinants on the G2 glycoprotein of Rift Valley fever virus. J. Virol. 58:263–270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Kielian M. 2006. Class II virus membrane fusion proteins. Virology 344:38–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kielian M, Rey FA. 2006. Virus membrane-fusion proteins: more than one way to make a hairpin. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:67–76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kortekaas J, et al. 2010. Intramuscular inoculation of calves with an experimental Newcastle disease virus-based vector vaccine elicits neutralizing antibodies against Rift Valley fever virus. Vaccine 28:2271–2276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kortekaas J, et al. 2011. Creation of a nonspreading Rift Valley fever virus. J. Virol. 85:12622–12630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Krishnan A, et al. 2009. A histidine switch in hemagglutinin-neuraminidase triggers paramyxovirus-cell membrane fusion. J. Virol. 83:1727–1741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Le Blanc I, et al. 2005. Endosome-to-cytosol transport of viral nucleocapsids. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:653–664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Li Z, Blissard GW. 2011. Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus GP64 protein: roles of histidine residues in triggering membrane fusion and fusion pore expansion. J. Virol. 85:12492–12504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Liu L, Celma CC, Roy P. 2008. Rift Valley fever virus structural proteins: expression, characterization and assembly of recombinant proteins. Virol. J. 5:82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Lozach PY, Huotari J, Helenius A. 2011. Late-penetrating viruses. Curr. Opin. Virol. 1:35–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Lozach PY, et al. 2010. Entry of bunyaviruses into mammalian cells. Cell Host Microbe 7:488–499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Martin K, Helenius A. 1991. Transport of incoming influenza virus nucleocapsids into the nucleus. J. Virol. 65:232–244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Mundel B, Gear J. 1951. Rift valley fever. I. The occurrence of human cases in Johannesburg. S. Afr. Med. J. 25:797–800 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Ogino M, et al. 2004. Cell fusion activities of Hantaan virus envelope glycoproteins. J. Virol. 78:10776–10782 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ohkuma S, Poole B. 1978. Fluorescence probe measurement of the intralysosomal pH in living cells and the perturbation of pH by various agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75:3327–3331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Overby AK, Pettersson RF, Grunewald K, Huiskonen JT. 2008. Insights into bunyavirus architecture from electron cryotomography of Uukuniemi virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:2375–2379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Overby AK, Pettersson RF, Neve EP. 2007. The glycoprotein cytoplasmic tail of Uukuniemi virus (Bunyaviridae) interacts with ribonucleoproteins and is critical for genome packaging. J. Virol. 81:3198–3205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Pepin M, Bouloy M, Bird BH, Kemp A, Paweska J. 2010. Rift Valley fever virus (Bunyaviridae: Phlebovirus): an update on pathogenesis, molecular epidemiology, vectors, diagnostics and prevention. Vet. Res. 41:61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Piper ME, Sorenson DR, Gerrard SR. 2011. Efficient cellular release of Rift Valley fever virus requires genomic RNA. PLoS One 6:e18070 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Plassmeyer ML, et al. 2007. Mutagenesis of the La Crosse virus glycoprotein supports a role for Gc (1066–1087) as the fusion peptide. Virology 358:273–282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Qin ZL, Zheng Y, Kielian M. 2009. Role of conserved histidine residues in the low-pH dependence of the Semliki Forest virus fusion protein. J. Virol. 83:4670–4677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Rich KM, Wanyoike F. 2010. An assessment of the regional and national socio-economic impacts of the 2007 Rift Valley fever outbreak in Kenya. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 83:52–57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Roche S, Albertini AA, Lepault J, Bressanelli S, Gaudin Y. 2008. Structures of vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein: membrane fusion revisited. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65:1716–1728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Ronka H, Hilden P, Von Bonsdorff CH, Kuismanen E. 1995. Homodimeric association of the spike glycoproteins G1 and G2 of Uukuniemi virus. Virology 211:241–250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Rusu M, et al. 2012. An assembly model of Rift Valley fever virus. Front. Microbiol. 3:254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Sanchez-San Martin C, Liu CY, Kielian M. 2009. Dealing with low pH: entry and exit of alphaviruses and flaviviruses. Trends Microbiol. 17:514–521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Santos RI, et al. 2008. Oropouche virus entry into HeLa cells involves clathrin and requires endosomal acidification. Virus Res. 138:139–143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Schmaljohn CS, Nichol ST. 2007. Bunyaviridae, p 1741–1789 In Knipe DM, Howley PM. (ed), Fields virology, 5th ed, vol 2 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA [Google Scholar]
- 57. Schowalter RM, Chang A, Robach JG, Buchholz UJ, Dutch RE. 2009. Low-pH triggering of human metapneumovirus fusion: essential residues and importance in entry. J. Virol. 83:1511–1522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Simon M, Johansson C, Mirazimi A. 2009. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus entry and replication is clathrin-, pH- and cholesterol-dependent. J. Gen. Virol. 90:210–215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Stiasny K, Allison SL, Marchler-Bauer A, Kunz C, Heinz FX. 1996. Structural requirements for low-pH-induced rearrangements in the envelope glycoprotein of tick-borne encephalitis virus. J. Virol. 70:8142–8147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Struthers JK, Swanepoel R, Shepherd SP. 1984. Protein synthesis in Rift Valley fever virus-infected cells. Virology 134:118–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Thoennes S, et al. 2008. Analysis of residues near the fusion peptide in the influenza hemagglutinin structure for roles in triggering membrane fusion. Virology 370:403–414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Tischler ND, Gonzalez A, Perez-Acle T, Rosemblatt M, Valenzuela PD. 2005. Hantavirus Gc glycoprotein: evidence for a class II fusion protein. J. Gen. Virol. 86:2937–2947 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Vaney MC, Rey FA. 2011. Class II enveloped viruses. Cell. Microbiol. 13:1451–1459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Wahlberg JM, Garoff H. 1992. Membrane fusion process of Semliki Forest virus. I. Low pH-induced rearrangement in spike protein quaternary structure precedes virus penetration into cells. J. Cell Biol. 116:339–348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Walter CT, Barr JN. 2011. Recent advances in the molecular and cellular biology of bunyaviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 92:2467–2484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Wang GJ, Hewlett M, Chiu W. 1991. Structural variation of La Crosse virions under different chemical and physical conditions. Virology 184:455–459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Weissenhorn W, Hinz A, Gaudin Y. 2007. Virus membrane fusion. FEBS Lett. 581:2150–2155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. White J, Matlin K, Helenius A. 1981. Cell fusion by Semliki Forest, influenza, and vesicular stomatitis viruses. J. Cell Biol. 89:674–679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Yoshimura A, et al. 1982. Infectious cell entry mechanism of influenza virus. J. Virol. 43:284–293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]