Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul 21;12(6):710–716. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2012.06.011

Regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis and cancer signaling

Andrey Gorin 1, Linara Gabitova 1, Igor Astsaturov 1,
PMCID: PMC3504641  NIHMSID: NIHMS396682  PMID: 22824431

Abstract

Cellular growth is highly dependent on sustained production of lipids. Sterol composition of cellular membranes determines multiple biochemical and biophysical properties of membrane-based processes including vesicle traffic, receptor signaling and assembly of protein complexes. Lipid biogenesis has become an attractive biochemical target in cancer given the high level of dependency on sterols and lipids in a cancer cell. This review summarized the current knowledge of mechanisms of interaction between the metabolism of sterols and receptor signaling.

Introduction

Emerging data from profiling of cancer tissues [1] and in vitro cell line models [2] demonstrate critical contribution of cholesterol metabolism to cancer origins and drug resistance. The early steps in the cholesterol biosynthesis provide cells with several compounds that are essential for cell growth and division, such as mevalonic acid, farnesyl pyrophosphate and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate essential for PI3K, Akt, Ras and other GTPases signaling. Because of the marked dependency of cancer cells on isoprenylated molecules for cell growth, targeting HMG-CoA-reductase with statins and prenylation enzymes with farnesyl transferase inhibitors has been extensively explored in the laboratory but so far produced modest results in the clinic, apparently due to significant pathway redundancies [3].

The distal steps of cholesterol biosynthesis below the level of first aromatic precursor, squalene, have been relatively understudied in the context of cancer signling (Figure 1). The genetic syndromes arising from mutations in the genes of distal cholesterol biosynthesis show aberrations in sonic hedgehog signaling pathway, and now been proposed as targets for cancer therapy. The azole antifungal compounds, such as ketoconazole, block the function of several cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the steroid hormone biosynthesis. Its activity against CYP51A1 (which catalyzes demethylation of lanosterol) and CYP17A1 (which mediates a step in the synthesis of androgens) has been utilized clinically to treat hormone refractory prostate cancer, and has recently been surpassed by abiraterone, a CYP17A1 antagonist[4]. Itraconazole via its inhibitory effects on Smoothened in the hedgehog pathway has shown activity against medulloblastoma [5]. Another unsuspected effect of itraconazole is suppression of angiogenesis via its interference with lysosomal cholesterol trafficking [6], thus offering a new clinical applications for this class of agents. In this review, we attempted to explore future therapeutic opportunities based on interactions between cholesterol metabolism and signaling in cancer cells.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schema of the cholesterol pathway. The parallel structures arising from the activity of “tail” reductase DHCR24 on every level of the pathway are not shown for simplicity. Relevant enzymes and genetic syndromes arising from enzyme mutations are italicized. Some biological functions are shown in boxed text.

Cholesterol pathway in cancer biology and therapy

Active sterol biosynthesis remains an essential metabolic component of cancer, and changes in the function of this pathway are thought to contribute to treatment resistance. Analysis of microarray transcriptional profiling demonstrated that refractory cancers exhibit significant overexpression of a number of cholesterol pathway genes. As some examples, a sterol pathway transcriptional signature has been identified for refractory MUC1-positive breast cancer and NSCLC [7] associated with tamoxifen resistance and poorer survival. The functional significance and the mechanism by which cholesterol pathway genes contribute to resistance are yet unclear.

In normal cells lipogenesis processes are at low level via transcriptional regualtion of the key genes involved in lipid biosynthesis (i.e. ATP citrate lyase, acetyl-CoA carboxylase, and fatty acid) [8]. In cotrast, in tumor cells, increased signaling activity of growth factor or steroid hormone receptors via PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK1/2 [9], HIF-1α, p53 [10], and SHH [11] pathways modulate and activate SREBP-1, the main regulatory component of lipogenesis. Overexpression of lipogenic enzymes was observed in a number of carcinomas [12] and was described to correlate with disease severity, increased risk of recurrence, and a lower chance of survival [13,14].

Besides increased synthesis, the level of intracellular cholesterol can be regulated by coordination of import/export machinery. The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors import cholesterol from the milieu and are, in turn, regulated by the SREBP transcriptional factors [15]. The excess of cholesterol or of its oxidized products, oxysterols, activate liver X receptors (LXR) and retinoid X receptor (RXR) heterodimeric transcriptional factors. Subsequent induction of expression of ABC-family transporters results in efflux of cholesterol. LXR also suppresses LDL receptor levels via its ubquitin-mediated degradation [16]. In the clinical trials or cancer cell lines models, EGFR-driven glioblastoma tumors are dependent on lipid synthesis so that inhibition of lipogenesis shows promising activity [17]. Activation of LXR with an agonist [18] or inhibition of lipogenic enzymes [19] may be potential therapeutic avenues in these tumors.

Accelerated synthesis of lipids and sterols is also an essential mechanistic component of malignant transformation: OLR1, oxidized LDL receptor 1, is required for Src kinase transformation of immortalized MCF10A cells [2]. Besides the significant induction of OLR1 during transformation it has been shown that depletion of OLR1 by siRNA blocks morphological transformation and inhibits cell migration and invasion and results in reduction of tumor growth in vivo [2]. Conversely, overexpression of ORL1 protein in MCF10A and HCC1143 cells leads to significant upregulation of BCL2, a negative regulator of apoptosis [20].

Cholesterol in cellular membranes and receptor signaling

Lipid rafts are small domains (10–200 nm) in plasma membrane with specific composition and properties. Lipid rafts are enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipids and present in liquid-ordered phase that is more rigid and less liquid comparing to surrounding membrane [21]. Two major types of rafts have been distinguished: planar non-caveolar and caveolae that form tube-like invaginations of plasma membrane [22]. Rafts may act as signaling platforms to harbor various proteins including receptors and signaling molecules. The recruitment of proteins to lipid rafts is mediated through the assembly of protein complexes where caveolin-1, flotillins and other scaffolding factors attract Src family kinases and a variety of cytoskeleton proteins to regulate signaling and endocytosis of surface molecules [23]. Later work from the Di Fiore laboratory [24] implicated endocytosis as the mechanism for cholesterol regulation of EGFR signaling and endocytic turnover. Clathrin-independent endocytosis was associated with shortened EGFR signaling output and increased degradation, while the clathrin-mediated endocytic EGFR trafficking promoted EGFR recycling.

After the initial engagement of the EGFR on the cell surface with its ligands, the receptor signaling activity, and the EGFR stability and functional availability is governed by its endocytic routes [25]. EGFR can be internalized through two major pathways: clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent (reviewed in [26]). The dynamic choice between these two pathways is susceptible to regulation which in vitro can be modeled by altering the ligand concentration. Under low EGF stimulation, the EGFR is predominantly internalized to the clathrin-coated vesicles, whereas high, albeit within the range of physiological level, EGF concentration leads to equal distribution of receptor between clathrin and non-clathrin vesicles [24]. The way of internalization determines the fate of the receptor. After clathrin-dependent endocytosis EGFR mostly recycles back to the plasma membrane, whereas clathrin-independent pathway moves EGFR towards degradation. Clathrin-independent internalization can be inhibited by lipophilic cholesterol-binding agents (nystatin, filipin) which shift the EGFR internalization towards clathrin-dependent mechanism and, as a consequence, leads to decreased level of EGFR degradation [24].

Sterol composition of cellular membranes directly regulates internalization of GPI-anchored membrane proteins (e.g. folate receptor, bacterial shiga toxin and cholera toxin B) and viruses via a clathrin and dynamin-independent mechanism, clathrin-independent carriers/GPI-enriched early endosomal compartments (CLIC/GEEC) [27]. This mechanism of endocytosis appears to be highly sensitive to cholesterol depletion as spontaneous formation of invaginating tubular structures from the surface membranes is preceded by cholesterol-dependent membrane reorganization. Modeling of the lipid bilayers in cell-free systems shows changes in the membrane curvatures caused by changes in the tilt of polarized GM1 lipids when bound to cholera toxin B ligand [28]. Experiments in energy-depleted cells demonstrated that CLIC/GEEC tubular structures could spontaneously form after protein binding to the lipids due to shifts in the physical properties of membranes [29]. Subsequent polimerization of cortical actin regulated by Arp2/3 complex finishes the job of pinching off the endocytic vesicle [29].

A highly regulated sequential engagement and disengagement of specific Rab-family small GTPases with EGFR-containing vesicles specifies the unidirectional trafficking of the vesicular cargo (reviewed in [30]). Importantly, the association of Rab proteins with intracellular membranes is sensitive to even minor fluctuations in the sterol composition of the intracellular membranes [31]. Rab4, Rab7 and Rab9 are stabilized in the membrane-bound state by increased cholesterol in endosomal membranes, and defects in sterol membrane composition are associated with Niemann-Pick disease [32]. Of particular interest, Rab4 has been shown to regulate rapid recycling of αvβ3-integrins during cell adhesion and spreading [33]. Rab-coupling protein, RCP (also known as RAB11FIP1), which controls recycling of both integrins and EGFR, is a frequently amplified in breast cancer locus (8p11–12), and promotes motility, anchorage-independent growth and metastatic behavior [34].

Internalized endosomal EGFR undergoes an activation-dependent conjugation of ubiquitin to its intracellular tail, which serves as a molecular tag to direct the vesicle-attached EGFR cargo to its final destination [35]. The process of EGFR degradation in lysosomes and late endocytic vacuoles is an important regulatory mechanism of signaling [36]. We have combined network analysis and siRNA library screening to identify genes that modulate the sensitivity of cells to EGFR inhibitors that are widely used in the clinic [37]. As a result of this screen, we first discovered that knockdown of the SC4MOL protein, best known as a component of the sterol pathway (Figure 1), potently sensitizes tumor cells to EGFR inhibitors. SC4MOL catalyzes an initial conversion step of 4,4-dimethyl-5α-cholesta-8,24-trien-3β-ol (also known as testicular meiosis activating sterol, or T-MAS) to zymosterol in the distal sterol biosynthesis pathway. Suggestively, recent comprehensive analyses of genetic interactions in yeast showed that the genes regulating ergosterol and fatty acid biosynthesis exhibit the strongest interactions with genes involved in vesicular trafficking and Golgi and vacuole endosome sorting [38].

Regulation of vesicular trafficking: possible role for sterol-binding proteins

Oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP) and OSBP-related proteins (ORP or OSBP-like proteins) are a highly conserved eukaryotic family of lipid binding proteins. OSBPLs were originally isolated because of their ability to bind cholesterol and its oxysterol derivatives. Recently, OSBP and ORPs have been shown to mediate a number of cellular processes including signal transduction [39], lipid metabolism [40], vesicular trafficking and non-vesicular sterol transport [41]. A direct role for OSBP in signaling was demonstrated in the regulation of ERK1/2 dephosphorylation [39] through direct physical interaction with PP2A and HePTP phosphatases. OSBP family members contain a core OSBP-related domain, and many also contain an N-terminal pleckstrin homology domain, the endoplasmic-reticulum-targeting FFAT (two phenylalanines in an acidic tract) motifs, GOLD (Golgi dynamics) domains and/or ankyrin repeats. The sterol-binding (SBD) domain is composed of an arrangement of antiparallel beta-sheets forming a barrel-like sterol binding cavity capable of binding various sterol species including cholesterol and oxysterols among tested. The first 1–29 N-terminal residues form a lid that covers the tunnel opening. When SBD is sterol-bound, the lid closed conformation is stabilized and is resistant to trypsin digestion. Depleting cells of cholesterol or addition of 25-OH-cholesterol causes the OSBP to change its conformation and the complex to disassembly. Thus, OSBP functions as a sterol sensor that regulates ERK activity in response to binding sterols by functioning as a “scaffold” for the assembly of a signaling protein complex [39]. The PH domain allows for some OSBP proteins to bind phosphoinositides (PI4P) and targets it to the Golgi membranes. The OSBP family SBD resembles the sterol-binding domains of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) transport (START) proteins (MLN64, StarD4) [42].

Cholesterol composition is critical for the function of late endosomes and multivesicular bodies. Kobuna et al. [43] generated deletion mutants of all four ORP genes in C. elegans. Single mutant worms with deletions in obr-1, obr-2, obr-3, obr-4 were viable and fertile, while the quadruple mutants that lacked all obr genes exhibited embryionic lethality (11%) and slow growth during larval development (18%). These data indicated that four C. elegans ORP proteins act redundantly during embryonic and larval development. An RNAi modifier screen in obr quadruple mutants identified the ESCRT complex genes as strong genetic interactions with obr genes. In obrs mutants, or in OPR1L siRNA-treated HeLa cells, degradation of membrane proteins, such as an EGF receptor and caveolin, was delayed and the late endosomes/lysosomes were enlarged. In Drosophila, another auxotrophic organism whose genome contains only 4 OSBP proteins, OSBP and cholesterol are required for spermatogenesis. The separation of individual sperm cells in flies involves significant membrane remodelling and vesicular trafficking during which OSBP is directly interacting with FAN, an ER-specific vesicle coat VAP protein [44].

The importance for the sterol-binding genes in cancer has recently become even more apparent after an elegant biochemical identification of OSBP and OSBPL4 as targets for several naturally occurring cytotoxic agents [45] with selective activity in multiple cancer cell lines characterized by loss of NF1, or p21/WAF1[46]. This discovery has not only provided the field with new chemical tools to study the function of sterol transporters but will also undoubtedly spur development of a completely new class of anti-cancer agents.

The detailed mechanisms by which the sterol pathway genes modulate receptor trafficking and signaling are not yet clear. However, studies in yeast show that highly conserved sterol pathway genes regulate physiological activity of cell surface receptors. In yeast, erg3/erg6 and erg2/erg6 double mutants demonstrate abnormal signaling by the pheromone receptor STE2, and influence STE2 endocytosis [47]. Mutations of the hydra/EBP sterol pathway gene in Arabidopsis results in grossly abnormal growth receptor signaling [48]. Furthermore, a specific association between EGFR signaling and specific methylsterols relevant to our screening results has been demonstrated in reproductive physiology, where EGFR plays an important role. The C4-methylsterols known as follicular meiosis activating sterol and testicular meiosis activating sterol (F-MAS and T-MAS) are abundant in the follicular fluid in ovaries and in testes, respectively. Their accumulation is regulated by SC4MOL/ERG25 and another functional partner, DHCR14/ERG24 (hydroxysterol delta 14-reductase). These methylsterols are important in regulating germinal vesicle breakdown, meiosis resumption by oocytes, and dispersal of cumulus cells, processes also regulated by the EGFR-MAPK pathway [49]. These data suggest that sterol metabolism and the sterol composition of cellular membranes plays an important conserved role in the functionality of growth factor receptors.

The regulatory effects of sterol metabolites on receptor signaling present an opportunity to exploit cholesterol pathway inhibitors for the treatment of human cancers. This potential should be however considered in the context of multifunctionality of the sterol pathway enzymes. For example, EBP in a complex with DHCR7 serve as a cholesterol epoxide hydrolase for toxic cholesterol-5,6-epoxide metabolites [50]. Cholestan-5α,6α-epoxy-3β-ol (αCE), cholestan-5β,6β-epoxy-3β-ol (β-CE), and 7-ketocholesterol are oxidized on the ring B of cholesterol and are the major autoxidation products of cholesterol. Cholesterol epoxides (α-CE and β-CE) are the only known substrates of ChEH, and 7-ketocholesterol is an inhibitor of ChEH. Of note, the side-chain oxysterols had no binding activity towards cholesterol epoxide hydrolase. While no information is available on the effect of naturally occurring cholesterol epoxides on Shh and other signaling pathways, loss of DHCR7 function (gene mutated in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome) may mediate its inhibitory effect via these cholesterol autooxidation products or their derivatives.

Concluding remarks

Maintenance of cholesterol homeostasis is one of the fundamental requirements for growth in eukaryotic cells. This metabolic pathway underwent very little changes from yeast to humans with nearly identical principal metabolites (especially from mevalonate to zymosterol) and highly homologous enzymes. Challenges in organic chemistry of sterol derivatives and methodological limitations for their direct detection in vivo, especially in the context of sterol-protein interactions, made this field relatively less explored. Recent breakthroughs, however, with few striking examples of critical importance of the sterol derivatives in cancer biology and in signaling pathways [45] reinvigorated the field. Based on these examples, we anticipate that sterol-binding binding proteins and sterol pathway genes, especially the enzymes downstream of squalene, will emerge as novel pharmacologically amenable regulators of membrane-based cellular processes. Modulating the activity of these proteins indirectly, or through a direct modification of sterol composition of cell membranes will have a profound effect on vesicular trafficking and signaling with potential far-reaching implications for cancer biology and therapy.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Increased demands for de novo cholesterol biosynthesis is regulated via signaling inputs from cell surface growth factor receptors (e.g. ErbB family shown) which induce transcriptional activity SREBP-1 and -2. Excess of cholesterol will suppress SREBP via its inhibitory interaction with SCAP. The alternative to de novo biosynthesis is cholesterol import via LDL-receptor. LDL-R has to undergo lysosomal degradation in order to liberate cholesterol from the endocytosed lipid particles. Oxidized cholesterol species bind to LXR which is a heterodimeric transcriptional factor for various regulatory proteins including cholesterol efflux pumps, ABC-A1 and -G1. A ubiquitin ligase IDOL is involved in LXR-dependent LDL-R degradation.

Highlights.

  • Cholesterol biosynthesis is a highly conserved, from yeast to humans, metabolic pathway that is the essential for cell growth

  • Alterations in the cellular sterol pools have profound effects on endosomes trafficking

  • And also on the signaling activity of most cellular receptor systems in cancer cells

  • Specific targeting of sterol pathway enzymes or sterol binding proteins may be a powerful anticancer strategy

  • Especially given the absolute linearity and non-redundancy of the pathway

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH core grant CA-06927, by the Pew Charitable Fund, and by a generous gift from Mrs. Concetta Greenberg to Fox Chase Cancer Center, by NIH R21 CA-164205 and 1K22CA-160725 (to I.A.), and by Tobacco Settlement funding from the State of Pennsylvania (IA). We are grateful to Dr. Erica Golemis for critical comments on the work.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Hilvo M, Denkert C, Lehtinen L, Muller B, Brockmoller S, Seppanen-Laakso T, Budczies J, Bucher E, Yetukuri L, Castillo S, Berg E, et al. Novel theranostic opportunities offered by characterization of altered membrane lipid metabolism in breast cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2011;71(9):3236–3245. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **2.Hirsch HA, Iliopoulos D, Joshi A, Zhang Y, Jaeger SA, Bulyk M, Tsichlis PN, Shirley Liu X, Struhl K. A transcriptional signature and common gene networks link cancer with lipid metabolism and diverse human diseases. Cancer Cell. 2010;17(4):348–361. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.01.022. This paper describes a common transcriptional program linking malignant transformation with disorders of lipid metabolism. In two cell lines models, oncogenic transformation was critically dependent on the function of receptor for oxidized lipid particles, OLR1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Delarue FL, Adnane J, Joshi B, Blaskovich MA, Wang DA, Hawker J, Bizouarn F, Ohkanda J, Zhu K, Hamilton AD, Chellappan S, et al. Farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitors upregulate RhoB expression by HDAC1 dissociation, HAT association and histone acetylation of the RhoB promoter. Oncogene. 2007;26(5):633–640. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, Fizazi K, North S, Chu L, Chi KN, Jones RJ, Goodman OB, Jr, Saad F, Staffurth JN, et al. Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(21):1995–2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1014618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *5.Kim J, Tang JY, Gong R, Lee JJ, Clemons KV, Chong CR, Chang KS, Fereshteh M, Gardner D, Reya T, Liu JO, et al. Itraconazole, a commonly used antifungal that inhibits Hedgehog pathway activity and cancer growth. Cancer Cell. 2010;17(4):388–399. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.02.027. A chemical library screen identifies a series of unrelated compounds as potent inhibitors of hedgehog signaling. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *6.Xu J, Dang Y, Ren YR, Liu JO. Cholesterol trafficking is required for mTOR activation in endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(10):4764–4769. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910872107. The anti-angiogenic effect of itraconazole, a well-established CYP51/ERG11 antifungal antibiotic, is exerted via inhibition of endosomal cholesterol trafficking and suppression of mTOR signaling. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *7.Pitroda SP, Khodarev NN, Beckett MA, Kufe DW, Weichselbaum RR. MUC1-induced alterations in a lipid metabolic gene network predict response of human breast cancers to tamoxifen treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(14):5837–5841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812029106. High expression of cholesterol pathway genes is associated with resistance to tamoxifen, an anti-estrogen. Interestingly, tamoxifen is also an inhibitor of EBP/DHCR7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Swinnen JV, Brusselmans K, Verhoeven G. Increased lipogenesis in cancer cells: new players, novel targets. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2006;9(4):358–365. doi: 10.1097/01.mco.0000232894.28674.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Menendez JA, Lupu R. Fatty acid synthase and the lipogenic phenotype in cancer pathogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(10):763–777. doi: 10.1038/nrc2222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oliveras G, Blancafort A, Urruticoechea A, Campuzano O, Gomez-Cabello D, Brugada R, Lopez-Rodriguez ML, Colomer R, Puig T. Novel anti-fatty acid synthase compounds with anti-cancer activity in HER2+ breast cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1210:86–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05777.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *11.Bhatia B, Hsieh M, Kenney AM, Nahle Z. Mitogenic Sonic hedgehog signaling drives E2F1-dependent lipogenesis in progenitor cells and medulloblastoma. Oncogene. 2011;30(4):410–422. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.454. A lipogenic enzyme, fatty acid synthase, is critical for sonic hedgehog signaling and malignant transformation of the cerebellar granule neuron precursor cells. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nagahashi M, Ramachandran S, Kim EY, Allegood JC, Rashid OM, Yamada A, Zhao R, Milstien S, Zhou H, Spiegel S, Takabe K. Sphingosine-1-phosphate produced by sphingosine kinase 1 promotes breast cancer progression by stimulating angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2012;72(3):726–735. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Uddin S, Hussain AR, Ahmed M, Abubaker J, Al-Sanea N, Abduljabbar A, Ashari LH, Alhomoud S, Al-Dayel F, Bavi P, Al-Kuraya KS. High prevalence of fatty acid synthase expression in colorectal cancers in Middle Eastern patients and its potential role as a therapeutic target. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(7):1790–1801. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mashima T, Seimiya H, Tsuruo T. De novo fatty-acid synthesis and related pathways as molecular targets for cancer therapy. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(9):1369–1372. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **15.Radhakrishnan A, Goldstein JL, McDonald JG, Brown MS. Switch-like control of SREBP-2 transport triggered by small changes in ER cholesterol: a delicate balance. Cell Metab. 2008;8(6):512–521. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.008. This paper is of fundamental importance as it describes cholesterol-responsive regulatory mechanism of trascriptional regulation of sterol biosynthesis and the effects on membrane sterols. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zelcer N, Hong C, Boyadjian R, Tontonoz P. LXR regulates cholesterol uptake through Idol-dependent ubiquitination of the LDL receptor. Science. 2009;325(5936):100–104. doi: 10.1126/science.1168974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guo D, Hildebrandt IJ, Prins RM, Soto H, Mazzotta MM, Dang J, Czernin J, Shyy JY, Watson AD, Phelps M, Radu CG, et al. The AMPK agonist AICAR inhibits the growth of EGFRvIII-expressing glioblastomas by inhibiting lipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(31):12932–12937. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906606106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **18.Guo D, Reinitz F, Youssef M, Hong C, Nathanson D, Akhavan D, Kuga D, Amzajerdi AN, Soto H, Zhu S, Babic I, et al. An LXR agonist promotes GBM cell death through inhibition of an EGFR/AKT/SREBP-1/LDLR-dependent pathway. Cancer Discov. 2011;1(5):442–456. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0102. A regulatory network of lipid metabolism in cancer cells can be disrupted pharmacologically with potential therapeutic application in brain tumors. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Guo D, Prins RM, Dang J, Kuga D, Iwanami A, Soto H, Lin KY, Huang TT, Akhavan D, Hock MB, Zhu S, et al. EGFR signaling through an Akt-SREBP-1-dependent, rapamycin-resistant pathway sensitizes glioblastomas to antilipogenic therapy. Sci Signal. 2009;2(101):ra82. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khaidakov M, Mitra S, Kang BY, Wang X, Kadlubar S, Novelli G, Raj V, Winters M, Carter WC, Mehta JL. Oxidized LDL receptor 1 (OLR1) as a possible link between obesity, dyslipidemia and cancer. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lingwood D, Simons K. Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science. 2010;327(5961):46–50. doi: 10.1126/science.1174621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Staubach S, Hanisch FG. Lipid rafts: signaling and sorting platforms of cells and their roles in cancer. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2011;8(2):263–277. doi: 10.1586/epr.11.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Echarri A, Muriel O, Del Pozo MA. Intracellular trafficking of raft/caveolae domains: insights from integrin signaling. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007;18(5):627–637. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **24.Sigismund S, Argenzio E, Tosoni D, Cavallaro E, Polo S, Di Fiore PP. Clathrin-mediated internalization is essential for sustained EGFR signaling but dispensable for degradation. Dev Cell. 2008;15(2):209–219. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.06.012. A mechanistically detailed characterization of EGFR endosomal trafficking sensitive to cholesterol composition of the cellular membranes. EGFR endocytosis via either clathrin-independent or clathrin-mediated mechanism determines the fate of the receptor towards degradation or recycling, respectively. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.von Zastrow M, Sorkin A. Signaling on the endocytic pathway. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007;19(4):436–445. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sorkin A, Goh LK. Endocytosis and intracellular trafficking of ErbBs. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315(4):683–696. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sabharanjak S, Sharma P, Parton RG, Mayor S. GPI-anchored proteins are delivered to recycling endosomes via a distinct cdc42-regulated, clathrin-independent pinocytic pathway. Dev Cell. 2002;2(4):411–423. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00145-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Watkins EB, Miller CE, Majewski J, Kuhl TL. Membrane texture induced by specific protein binding and receptor clustering: active roles for lipids in cellular function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(17):6975–6980. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014579108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **29.Romer W, Pontani LL, Sorre B, Rentero C, Berland L, Chambon V, Lamaze C, Bassereau P, Sykes C, Gaus K, Johannes L. Actin dynamics drive membrane reorganization and scission in clathrin-independent endocytosis. Cell. 2010;140(4):540–553. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.010. Cholesterol-dependent membrane reorganization and formation of the membrane tubules precedes clathrin-independent endocytosis of shiga toxin, a process requiring actin network and Arp2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zwang Y, Yarden Y. Systems biology of growth factor-induced receptor endocytosis. Traffic. 2009;10(4):349–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00870.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Corbeel L, Freson K. Rab proteins and Rab-associated proteins: major actors in the mechanism of protein-trafficking disorders. Eur J Pediatr. 2008;167(7):723–729. doi: 10.1007/s00431-008-0740-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Choudhury A, Sharma DK, Marks DL, Pagano RE. Elevated endosomal cholesterol levels in Niemann-Pick cells inhibit rab4 and perturb membrane recycling. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15(10):4500–4511. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-05-0432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Roberts M, Barry S, Woods A, van der Sluijs P, Norman J. PDGF-regulated rab4-dependent recycling of alphavbeta3 integrin from early endosomes is necessary for cell adhesion and spreading. Curr Biol. 2001;11(18):1392–1402. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00442-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mills GB, Jurisica I, Yarden Y, Norman JC. Genomic amplicons target vesicle recycling in breast cancer. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(8):2123–2127. doi: 10.1172/JCI40256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Huang F, Kirkpatrick D, Jiang X, Gygi S, Sorkin A. Differential regulation of EGF receptor internalization and degradation by multiubiquitination within the kinase domain. Mol Cell. 2006;21(6):737–748. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gao C, Cao W, Bao L, Zuo W, Xie G, Cai T, Fu W, Zhang J, Wu W, Zhang X, Chen YG. Autophagy negatively regulates Wnt signalling by promoting Dishevelled degradation. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12(8):781–790. doi: 10.1038/ncb2082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Astsaturov I, Ratushny V, Sukhanova A, Einarson MB, Bagnyukova T, Zhou Y, Devarajan K, Silverman JS, Tikhmyanova N, Skobeleva N, Pecherskaya A, et al. Synthetic lethal screen of an EGFR-centered network to improve targeted therapies. Sci Signal. 2010 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • **38.Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, Sevier CS, Ding H, Koh JL, Toufighi K, Mostafavi S, Prinz J, et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science. 2010;327(5964):425–431. doi: 10.1126/science.1180823. A fundamentally significant characterization of functional dependencies in eukaryotic cells. Biological processes of endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi trafficking are critically dependent on intact lipid and sterol biosynthesis. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang PY, Weng J, Anderson RG. OSBP is a cholesterol-regulated scaffolding protein in control of ERK 1/2 activation. Science. 2005;307(5714):1472–1476. doi: 10.1126/science.1107710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Laitinen S, Lehto M, Lehtonen S, Hyvarinen K, Heino S, Lehtonen E, Ehnholm C, Ikonen E, Olkkonen VM. ORP2, a homolog of oxysterol binding protein, regulates cellular cholesterol metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2002;43(2):245–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Alfaro G, Johansen J, Dighe SA, Duamel G, Kozminski KG, Beh CT. The sterol-binding protein Kes1/Osh4p is a regulator of polarized exocytosis. Traffic. 2011;12(11):1521–1536. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Soccio RE, Adams RM, Romanowski MJ, Sehayek E, Burley SK, Breslow JL. The cholesterol-regulated StarD4 gene encodes a StAR-related lipid transfer protein with two closely related homologues, StarD5 and StarD6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(10):6943–6948. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052143799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kobuna H, Inoue T, Shibata M, Gengyo-Ando K, Yamamoto A, Mitani S, Arai H. Multivesicular body formation requires OSBP-related proteins and cholesterol. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ma Z, Liu Z, Huang X. OSBP- and FAN-mediated sterol requirement for spermatogenesis in Drosophila. Development. 2010;137(22):3775–3784. doi: 10.1242/dev.049312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *45.Burgett AW, Poulsen TB, Wangkanont K, Anderson DR, Kikuchi C, Shimada K, Okubo S, Fortner KC, Mimaki Y, Kuroda M, Murphy JP, et al. Natural products reveal cancer cell dependence on oxysterol-binding proteins. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(9):639–647. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.625. This paper presents critical evidence for a novel mechanism of cytotoxicity mediated via interference with oxysterol-binding proteins. OSBP targeting compounds are widely used in nature by plants and animals as defense mechanism. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Turbyville TJ, Gursel DB, Tuskan RG, Walrath JC, Lipschultz CA, Lockett SJ, Wiemer DF, Beutler JA, Reilly KM. Schweinfurthin A selectively inhibits proliferation and Rho signaling in glioma and neurofibromatosis type 1 tumor cells in a NF1-GRD-dependent manner. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9(5):1234–1243. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Heese-Peck A, Pichler H, Zanolari B, Watanabe R, Daum G, Riezman H. Multiple functions of sterols in yeast endocytosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13(8):2664–2680. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-04-0186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Souter M, Topping J, Pullen M, Friml J, Palme K, Hackett R, Grierson D, Lindsey K. hydra Mutants of Arabidopsis are defective in sterol profiles and auxin and ethylene signaling. Plant Cell. 2002;14(5):1017–1031. doi: 10.1105/tpc.001248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fan HY, Liu Z, Shimada M, Sterneck E, Johnson PF, Hedrick SM, Richards JS. MAPK3/1 (ERK1/2);in ovarian granulosa cells are essential for female fertility. Science. 2009;324(5929):938–941. doi: 10.1126/science.1171396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • *50.de Medina P, Paillasse MR, Segala G, Poirot M, Silvente-Poirot S. Identification and pharmacological characterization of cholesterol-5,6-epoxide hydrolase as a target for tamoxifen and AEBS ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(30):13520–13525. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002922107. Cholesterol pathway enzymes perform multiple “moonlighting” functions including inactivation of cholesterol oxidation products. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES