Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1981 Sep;33(3):725–727. doi: 10.1128/iai.33.3.725-727.1981

In vitro cellular immune response to homologous and heterologous antigens in rabbits sensitized by five species of Mycobacterium and Nocardia asteroides.

M Kubín, J Pekárek, J Svejcar, B Procházka
PMCID: PMC350768  PMID: 6793517

Abstract

Rabbits were sensitized with killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. kansasii, M. avium, M. scrofulaceum, M. fortuitum, and Nocardia asteroides, and their response to homologous and heterologous antigens was assessed in vitro by direct and indirect macrophage migration inhibition tests. The antigens were obtained by disintegration of bacterial mass and by purification of the supernatants by ultracentrifugation. In the direct test, hypersensitivity to homologous antigen was most marked with M. tuberculosis, M. kansasii, and M. avium (migration indices [MI] = 0.42 to 0.50), but was significantly weaker with organisms possessing a lower degree of pathogenic activity (MI for M. fortuitum and N. asteroides = 0.70 and 0.72, respectively). Reactivity to heterologous antigens was also highest in animals sensitized with strongly pathogenic species, approximating normal values in rabbits sensitized with weak pathogens. In the indirect test, the strongest responses were obtained again to homologous antigens (MI = 0.42 to 0.67), and they differed more markedly from reactions to heterologous antigens than in the direct test. The weakest activity of heterologous antigens was again found with M. fortuitum and N. asteroides, where MIs were 0.82 to 0.93.

Full text

PDF
725

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chaparas S. D., Maloney C. J. An analysis of cross reactions among mycobacteria by in vivo and in vitro assays of cellular hypersensitivity. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978 May;117(5):897–902. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1978.117.5.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edwards L. B., Hopwood L., Palmer C. E. Identification of mycobacterial infections. Bull World Health Organ. 1965;33(3):405–412. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kubín M., Medek B., Levinský L., Nedved J., Svandová E., Svejcar J., Kubícková M. Cellular immunity in patients with tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium kansasii and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1979;23(2):186–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kubín M., Svejcar J., Wisingerová E., Pekárek J., Svandová E., Kubícková M. In vitro studies of cell-mediated immunity in rabbits sensitized with Mycobacterium kansasii and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 1980;25(3):242–245. doi: 10.1007/BF02877345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MAGNUSSON M., BLEIKER M. A., GRIEP W. A. Comparative intradermal reactions of young Dutch males to human purified tuberculin (PPD) and other sensitins. 1. Observations with different mycobacterial sensitins in non-vaccinated persons. Acta Tuberc Pneumol Scand. 1962;42:53–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. NYBOE J. The efficacy of the tuberculin test: an analysis based on results from 33 countries. Bull World Health Organ. 1960;22:5–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES