Abstract
Ferritins, a complex, mineralized, protein nanocage family essential for life, provide iron concentrates and oxidant protection. Protein based ion channels and Fe(II)/O2 catalysis initiate conversion of thousands of Fe atoms to caged, ferritin Fe2O3•H2O minerals. The ion channels consist of six helical segments, contributed by 3 of 12 or 24 polypeptide subunits, around the three-fold cage axes. The channel structure guides entering Fe(II) ions toward multiple, catalytic, diiron sites buried inside ferritin protein helices, ~20 Å away from channel internal exits. The catalytic product, Fe(III)-O(H)-Fe(III) is a mineral precursor; mineral nucleation begins inside the protein cage with mineral growth in the central protein cavity (5–8 nm diameter). Amino acid substitutions that changed ionic or hydrophobic channel interactions R72D, D122R, and L134P, increased ion channel structural disorder (protein crystallographic analyses), increased Fe(II) exit [chelated Fe(II) after ferric mineral reduction/dissolution]. Since substitutions of some channel carboxylate residues diminished ferritin catalysis with no effect on Fe(II) exit, such as E130A and D127A, we investigated catalysis in ferritins with altered Fe(II) exit, R72D, D122R and L134P. The results indicate that simply changing the ionic properties of the channels, as in the R72D variant, need not change the forward catalytic rate. However both D122R and L134, which had dramatic effects on ferritin catalysis also caused larger effects on channel structure and order, contrasting with R72D. All three amino acid substitutions, however, decreased the stability of the catalytic intermediate, diferric peroxo, even though overall ferritin cage structure is very stable, resisting 80°C and 6 M urea. The localized structural changes in ferritin subdomains that affect ferritin function over long distances, illustrate new properties of the protein cage in natural ferritin function and for applied ferritin uses.
Keywords: Iron oxidation, Ion channels, Caged mineral, Iron-oxy nanomineral, Ferritin, Diiron center
INTRODUCTION
The supramolecular protein family of ferritins synthesizes caged hydrated ferric oxide minerals. catalysis is a Ferritin minerals are metabolic iron concentrates; ferritin protein-based Fe(II)/O2 physiological antioxidant during biological stress 1. The ferritin cages, composed of polypeptides that spontaneously fold into bundles of four-α-helices and self-assemble from twelve or twenty-four subunits, have very high structural symmetry as illustrated in Figure 1. Many studies have shown that the three-fold symmetry axes in ferritin protein cages are ion channels that control Fe(II) entry for catalysis and Fe(II) exit after mineral dissolution; see recent reviews 1,2. Ferritin ion channel pores, at the ends of each Fe(II) ion channel, open onto the external (cytoplasmic) or internal surface of ferritin protein cages (Figure 1). At the external pores, the N-terminal sections of each polypeptide subunit extend from the helix bundle and are held in place around the pores by a network of hydrogen and ionic bonds. Disruption of the bonding network increases structural disorder in the N-terminus and increases Fe(II) exit rate, exemplifying molecular “gating” 3.
Another type of ferritin channel was recently identified inside each catalytically active (H or H′ or M) subunit, distal to the active site and distinct from Fe(II) ion channels. This newly discovered set of channels, mineral nucleation channels, was observed by comparing solution NMR of ferritin with and without ferric ions; four aliquots of 48 Fe(II) [8 Fe(II)/diiron nucleation site], added sequentially to ferritin protein cages in air, preceded acquisition of each NMR spectrum 4. Ferritin nucleation channels in each H-type subunit connect the catalytic sites to the internal mineral growth cavity and are absent in the animal L subunits, which are catalytically inactive. Nucleation channel pores are symmetrically placed around the four–fold symmetry axes of the ferritin cage 4. Proximity of four nucleation channel exits facilitates protein-based control of ferritin mineral order because mineral nuclei emerging from the nucleation channels spatially oriented by the nucleation channels can readily interact with other mineral nuclei emerging from neighboring, H subunits. Such observations provide a functional explanation for 4-fold symmetry in ferritin protein cages and the relationship between the numbers of protein catalytic sites and nucleation channels with degrees of order in ferritin mineral structures. Thus, the high crystallinity of ferritin minerals from tissues such as heart coincides with a high % of H subunits, and high number of cage catalytic sites and nucleation channels. By contrast, the low mineral order in ferritin minerals from tissues such as liver coincides with a low % of H subunits, low number of catalytic sites and nucleation channels in each ferritin cage 5 The low order of microbial ferritin minerals, which have a high mineral phosphate content (P:Fe = 1:2) compared to animal ferritin minerals (P:Fe = 1:8), reflects the high phosphate and is protein-independent 6–10, contrasting with the protein - dependence of animal ferritin mineral structure.
Fe(II), one of the two substrates for ferritin oxidoreductase activity, accesses the catalytic sites buried in protein cage through the ion channels around the three-fold symmetry axes of ferritin protein cages 10–12. Movement of Fe(II) though the ion channels is regulated, in part, by ion gradients created by the conserved negatively charged residues that line the ion channels 2,13. However, critical, functional, properties of ferritin ion channel structure depend on stabilization by conserved hydrophobic residues 3,14,15. In the 12 subunit mini-ferritins (Dps proteins) of bacteria, ion channel carboxylates control both Fe(II) entry and exit but in the more complex ion channels of 24 subunit maxi-ferritins some conserved, ion channel carboxylate residues, such as E130 and D127, selectively control only Fe(II) entry and not Fe(II) exit 16–18. Each ferritin ion channel in a 24 subunit protein cage supplies Fe(II) substrate to multiple oxidoreductase sites, since there can be as many as twenty-four active sites/protein cage (one/subunit) with only eight ion channels1.
As many as three metal ions are observed in clusters near the internal exit of each ion channel in cocrystals of ferritin protein cages with model divalent cations 12. They appear poised for distribution to three catalytic sites. Active site binding of two Fe(II) at ferritin diiron oxidoreductase sites can be monitored by MCD/CD, in the absence of O2. A Hill coefficient of three is observed for Fe(II) binding 19, although Fe(II) binding to each iron binding site in the diiron center is independent; the observation derives from an Fe(II) titration experiment that monitored spectroscopic signals of Fe(II) bound at each of the two sites in ferritin diiron catalytic centers. in the absence of O219. Because there was no O2 present and because the binding of two Fe(II) ions to each iron binding site in the diiron center was independent19, the positive cooperativity must reflect protein: protein interactions. Such ferritin protein: protein interactions may relate to the distribution of Fe(II) from single Fe(II) ion channels to multiple active sites. Note that confirmation of Fe(II) distribution by Fe(II)-ferritin co-crystallography is difficult because of the very rapid transfer of the Fe(II) substrate to the active site and reaction with the second substrate, O2 (msec) 1. Computational models based on gradients of negative charge in ferritin ion channels, e.g., 13 explain the general behavior of ferritin ion channel residues, but do not explain why different negatively charged channel residues have selective effects 3. The selective effects of different ion channel carboxylates indicate that properties other than charge influence Fe(II) transport through the ferritin ion channels 3.
Recent studies3 of Fe(II) exit during dissolution of the ferritin mineral, using protein cages of ferritin with variant channel residues, revealed a relationship between increased Fe(II) exit and two types of structural effects: 1. Increased flexibility (B′ factor) near the channel entry pores (R72D, D122R) and 2. Increased flexibility throughout the ion channel (D122R) or nearer the diiron catalytic sites (L134P). The change in R72, which is in a helix close to the external pore of each ion channel, caused disruption of the localized network of H and ionic bonds in the helix bundle and the N-terminal peptide that extends outside each helix bundle3, (Figure 1B) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Proteins | Disordered residues compared to wild type | Helices affected |
---|---|---|
R72D | 1–15 | Helix 1 |
D122R | 5 –15, 100–140 | Helix 1, Helix 3, Helix 4 |
L134P | 123–135 | Helix 3 |
B′-factors values are 2–4 times greater than wild type, as determined from XRD of protein crystals, 1.5 Å resolution 3. The N-terminal extension includes residues 1–11 and the channel residues are 110–134; helix 3 has residues 92–119 and helix 4 has residues 125–155.
In R72D, the structural changes and the functional changes in Fe(II) exit identified the gating function of the N-terminal peptide3 at the external (cytoplasmic) pores of ferritin ion channels. In L134P ferritin cages, the substitution of a conserved amino acid in the channel that forms stabilizing helix-helix interactions with ion channel residue (L110), caused structural disorder in the channel itself (Table 1) and increased Fe(II) exit rates, thereby revealing the role of the ion channels in dissolution of caged ferritin minerals and caged Fe(II) exit 14. Here we examine the effects of the structural changes in R72D, D122R and L134P on Fe(II) entry and ferritin oxidoreductase activity, by monitoring the formation and decay rates of the diferric peroxo (DFP) catalytic intermediate.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
The Fe(II) ion entry/exit channel mutants (R72D, D122R, and L134P) in M-ferritin protein cages were generated by QuikChange Mutagenesis (Stratagene) 3, using the extensively characterized frog (R. catesbeiana) M ferritin model; recombinant proteins were purified from E. coli as previously described 15,20. The final buffer for the proteins was 100 mM MOPS (pH 7.0) and 100 mM NaCl. Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford method (Biorad protein assay kit) with bovine serum albumin as a standard. Residual iron, determined as the Fe(II) -1,10-phenanthroline complex, was < 0.05 Fe/ferritin protein subunit (1.2 Fe/cage).
Ferritin solutions, 0.1 mM subunit (0.0042 mM protein cage), in 200 mM MOPS•Na, pH 7.0, 200 mM NaCl, were mixed with an equal volume of fleshly prepared FeSO4 solution (0.2 mM in 1.0 mM HCl) in a stopped-flow, UV/vis spectrophotometer (Applied Photophysics). Data were collected at Abs650 nm, the absorbance maximum of DFP intermediates in ferritin, and Abs350 nm, the non-specific absorbance of Fe(III)-O species that includes DFP, ferric oxo/hydroxo dimers, multimers and the protein-caged, ferric oxide mineral. Data were collected from 2–3 independent preparations of each protein measured 2–3 times each. Initial rates (Vi) were obtained from linear fitting to the early time domain (~ 50 ms) of Abs350 nm and Abs650 nm data. DFP decay rates were calculated by single exponential fitting to the decay process of the traces at Abs650 nm. Data analysis was performed with Igor software (WaveMetrics). The statistical significance of differences was determined using the student t-test.
RESULTS
The three-ferritin ion channel amino acids that were modified, R72, D122, and L134, are conserved in all eukaryotic ferritins and in some microbial ferritins. In general, ion channel sequences are highly conserved: 84 % (conservative substitution) and 52% (absolute) among vertebrates. Multiple ferritin genes code for natural amino acid substitutions that create ferritin protein cages with different combinations of subunit amino acid sequences specific to each tissue, such as animal liver and heart or plant leaf and stem. By contrast, the amino acids studied here, R72, D122 and L134 are encoded in all ferritin genes. Among the variations in multiple ferritin genes is a set of residues, which confer higher or lower ion channel stabilization from interhelical hydrophobic interactions. In such cases the functional and structural effects of the same amino acid substitution, L134P, appear to reflect the amino acid side chain variations and the associated difference in ion channel structure 3,12. The single amino acids substitutions studied here increased flexibility for multiple channel amino acids (Table 1) which indicates structural integration within the ion channels of ferritin proteins cages3.
The initial rate for DFP formation in R72D ferritin was indistinguishable from the wild type (Figure 2, Table 2), contrasting with the significant increase in Fe(II) exit rate3. Metal ion binding in the channels of R72D, observed in protein–Mg(II) co-crystals, had few changes 3. However, one of the metal ions is bound through water to D72, rather than nearby T118 as in wild type ferritin; another site in wild type ferritin, S131, E130, D127, is also missing in R72D3. The significant increase in the oxidation of Fe(II) in R72D, monitored as the absorbance increase at 350nm (Table 3), which does not occur with DFP formation, could reflect the impact of the faster decay of DFP on the formation of other ferric oxo/hydroxo species. The accelerated DFP decay in R72D ferritin indicates that the effects of localized structural changes in the ion channels influenced active sites ~25 Å away, even though, overall, the protein cage itself is unusually stable.
Table 2.
Sample | DFP formation rate (Via) | DFP decay rate constant | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
(ΔAbs650 nm/sec) | Normalized | (sec−1) | Normalized | |
WT | 1.50 ± 0.20 | 1.00 | 1.48 ± 0.11 | 1.00 |
R72D | 1.60 ± 0.30 | 1.07 ± 0.25 | 3.15 ± 0.25b | 2.12 ± 0.17b |
D122R | 0.36 ± 0.03b,c | 0.24 ± 0.02b,c | 2.77 ± 0.23b | 1.87 ± 0.15b |
L134P | 0.31 ± 0.03b,c | 0.21 ± 0.02b,c | 3.64 ± 0.20b | 2.46 ± 0.14b |
Initial rates were obtained from linear fitting to the early time domain (~ 50 ms) of ΔAbsorbance at 650 nanometers.
Significantly different than wild type, P<0.01;
Significantly different than R72D, P<0.01.
Table 3.
Sample | Fe(III)-Oa formation rate (Vib) | |
---|---|---|
(ΔAbs350 nm/sec) | Normalized | |
WT | 0.82 ± 0.09 | 1.0 |
R72D | 1.03 ± 0.05b | 1.25 ± 0.06c,d |
D122R | 0.27 ± 0.05b,c | 0.39 ± 0.07 c,d |
L134P | 0.15 ± 0.06b,c | 0.18 ± 0.08c,d |
The species containing Fe(III)-O unit which includes DFP, ferric oxo/hydroxo dimers, multimers and the protein-caged ferric oxide mineral.
Initial rates were obtained from linear fitting, first ~ 50 ms, of ΔAbs350 nm.
Significantly different than wild type, P<0.003.
Significantly different than R72D, P<0.003.
Depending on the particular change in ferritin ion channel structure, the rate of absorbance changes at A350nm (ferric oxo species) increased or decreased, depending on the amino acid substitution. DFP formation, A650 nm, by contrast, was either unaffected (R72D) or decreased (D122R, K134P) (Table 3). The increase in the rate of change at A350 nm may reflect the impact of faster decay of the diferric peroxo intermediate in R72D on the multiple ferric oxo species present.
The broad absorbance band, measured in this study at 350 nm, includes contributions of DFP, diferric oxo, ferric- oxo multimers (mineral nuclei), mineral itself and possibly some new species in altered ferritins such as R72D. Resolution of the many components absorbing in the range 300–400 nm has not been achieved in contrast to the specific UV-vis properties of the diferric peroxo intermediate with a λmax = 650nm. The accelerated DFP decay in R72D ferritin (Table 2) indicates that the even within the rigid protein “shell” of the ferritin cage (stable to 6 M urea and 80°C), there is sufficient conformational flexibility for structural changes in the ion channels to influence function over long distances (~25 Å).
In L134P and D122R ferritin, formation of DFP was significantly inhibited (Figure 2, Table 2) ~ 80% for both ferric oxo/hydroxo species, contrasting with R72D; DFP stability also changed in L134P and D122R, decreasing by ~60%. The decrease in DFP stability (Table 2), emphasizes that changes in ion channel structure and Fe(II) transit within ferritin ion channels can influence intracage reactions spatially separated from the ion channels. The increased flexibility of L134P ferritin ion channels is localized and near the ion channel exits inside ferritin cages. Metal ion binding exhibited decreased occupancy at most ion channel sites with elimination of any metal binding at the three D127 residues where a cluster of metal ions occurs in wild type protein 3, 22. The D122R substitution caused the most structural and functional disorder in ferritin Fe(II) ion channels of the three variant ferritin proteins studied (Table 1). 3 Only one metal ion was observed in Fe(II) ion channels of D122R -Mg(II) cocrystals (Figure 3). In D122R the single metal ion bound in each Fe(II) ion channel is in a constriction formed by the cluster of three E130 residues, one from each of the subunits that form the ion channels. Similarities in the Fe(II)/O2 reactions at the oxidoreductase sites in D122R and L134P ferritins (Table 2) contrast with the larger effects of D122R on Fe(II) exit during mineral dissolution 3, and emphasize the differential effects of ferritin ion channel residues and structure on Fe(II) exit during mineral dissolution and entry/active site access.
DISCUSSION
Ferritin protein cages are water and saline soluble macromolecular polypeptide assemblies that facilitate Fe(II) transport through protein ion channels. Protein assemblies that facilitate transport K(I), Ca(II), and Na(I), such as those in membranes of living cells, by contrast with ferritin, are much less accessible for study in the native environment. For ferritin ion channels, moreover, the effective transport of Fe(II) through the ion channels, can be specifically measured as the Fe(III)-O-O-Fe(III) catalytic intermediate, contrasting with membrane ion channels where the molecular destination of the ion after channel transport is often undefined. Fe(II) ion channels in ferritin protein cages are analyzed in crystals structure using “surrogate” ions that are not substrates, since Fe(II) moves through the ion channels and reached the active sites within msec; such surrogate metal ions include Mg(II) and Co(II) cocrystals or Cu(II) soaking 3, 22; 6–7 ions can be observed in the channels mainly at carboxylate residues. After soaking ferritn protein crystals in solutions of Fe(III) in air, only 1 Fe (III) atom was bound in the channel, at the three E130 carboxylates in the ion channel constrictions; the other Fe(III)) atoms were bound were at or near active site carboxylate residues. The results with Co(II) are similar to Fe, but different from Cu(II), indicting the metal selectivity of ferritin ion channel environments 3, 22. Fe(II) itself has not yet been trapped in the ion channels of eukaryotic ferritin protein crystals.
Here, by exploiting the ability to monitor Fe(II) flow, through the ion channels of the ferritin protein cage and the cage itself, as the kinetics diferric peroxo formation (msec) and decay (sec) we see that: 1. Changes in ferritin ion channel structure, whether by changing hydrophobic or charged amino acids, can slow but not prevent Fe(II) or O2 access to the active sites (DFP formation), illustrating the dominance of channel structure over localized carboxylate binding; 2. Changes in ferritin channel structure, even though long distances away from the channel exits, influence catalysis since DFP stability declines in all three variants studied, R72D, D122R and L134P. Whether it is Fe(II) or O2 access to the active sites or Fe/O2 reactivity that is inhibited by structural changes in ferritin ion channels is not known. In the ion gradient model for Fe(II) transit, the simple increase in carboxylate electronegativity through the channels to the active sites depends on specific folding of the polypeptide to achieve the needed charge distribution. The influence of complex protein: protein interactions on Fe(II) reactivity in ferritin protein cages is further illustrated by a Hill coefficient of 3 for the directly observed (MCD/CD), and independent binding of Fe(II) at each position in the diiron catalytic sites in the absence of O2 (MCD/CD) 19, and changes in ferritin function [decreased Fe(II) oxidation and Fe(III)2O3•H2O mineral reduction/dissolution] when ferritin protein subunits are fixed in position with chemical crosslinks 4, 23. Thus, the new data here complement the earlier data show the influence of complex, flexible, protein:protein interactions within the unusually stable protein cage on the transport and reactions of (Fe(II) in ferritin.
The impact of ferritin ion channel structure itself, distinct from specific Fe(II) ionic interactions with channel carboxylates, on catalysis at the middle of each ferritin cage subunit illustrates the contributions of the three fold symmetry axes to ferritin function: structural changes in and around the three fold axes not only affected rates at which Fe(II) iron arrived at the active sites (DFP formation), they altered rates of Fe(III) departing the active sites (DFP decay). Earlier studies showed that changes in ferritin nucleation channels around the four fold symmetry axes of ferritin cages also influenced Fe(III) leaving the active sites 4, 16–18. Thus, both the residues near the N-termini of ferritin subunits at the three fold symmetry axes and those near the C-terminal at the four fold symmetry axes alter rates at the active sites in the middle of each subunit, which in turn affect mineral growth and order1. Such observations suggest a connection between the 3 and 4 fold structural symmetry of assembled ferritin nanocages and function. Ferritin protein cage symmetry persists even though ferritin amino acid sequences diverge up to 80%, suggesting that that the structural subdomains of ferritin cages are preserved by natural selection and thus are related to function. As awareness of the relationships between the structural and functional properties of ferritin protein cages expand, including functional integration of cage subdomains, ferritin nanocage symmetry can be exploited in the synthesis of new, organized, nanomaterials.
Acknowledgments
FUNDING SOURCE: This work was supported by the CHORI Partners (ECT), National Institutes of Health Grant DK20251 (ECT, RKB and TT) and a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science postdoctoral fellowship for research abroad (TT).
ABBREVIATIONS
- diferric peroxo
- Fe(III)-O-O-Fe(III)-DFP
References
- 1.Theil EC. Current opinion in chemical biology. 2011;15:304. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chiancone E, Ceci P. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1800:798. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tosha T, Behera RK, Ng HL, Bhattasali O, Alber T, Theil EC. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:13016. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.332734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Turano P, Lalli D, Felli IC, Theil EC, Bertini I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908082106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.St Pierre T, Tran KC, Webb J, Macey DJ, Heywood BR, Sparks NH, Wade VJ, Mann S, Pootrakul P. Biol Met. 1991;4:162. doi: 10.1007/BF01141308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mann S, Williams JM, Treffrey A, Harrison PM. J Mol Biol. 1987;198:405. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90290-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rohrer JS, Islam QT, Watt GD, Sayers DE, Theil EC. Biochemistry. 1990;29:259. doi: 10.1021/bi00453a035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Waldo GS, Wright E, Wang ZH, Briat JF, Theil EC, Sayers DE. Plant Physiol. 1995;109:797. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.3.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wade VJ, Treffry A, Laulhere JP, Bauminger ER, Cleton MI, Mann S, Briat JF, Harrison PM. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993;1161:91. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(93)90201-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Le Brun NE, Crow A, Murphy ME, Mauk AG, Moore GR. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chiancone E, Ceci P, Ilari A, Ribacchi F, Stefanini S. Biometals. 2004;17:197. doi: 10.1023/b:biom.0000027692.24395.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tosha T, Ng HL, Bhattasali O, Alber T, Theil EC. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:14562. doi: 10.1021/ja105583d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Takahashi T, Kuyucak S. Biophys J. 2003;84:2256. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75031-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Takagi H, Shi D, Ha Y, Allewell NM, Theil EC. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:18685. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.30.18685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu X, Jin W, Theil EC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:3653. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0636928100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Levi S, Luzzago A, Franceschinelli F, Santambrogio P, Cesareni G, Arosio P. Biochem J. 1989;264:381. doi: 10.1042/bj2640381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Treffry A, Bauminger ER, Hechel D, Hodson NW, Nowik I, Yewdall SJ, Harrison PM. Biochem J. 1993;296:721. doi: 10.1042/bj2960721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Haldar S, Bevers LE, Tosha T, Theil EC. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:25620. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.205278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schwartz JK, Liu XS, Tosha T, Theil EC, Solomon EI. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:9441. doi: 10.1021/ja801251q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tosha T, Hasan MR, Theil EC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:18182. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805083105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jin W, Takagi H, Pancorbo NM, Theil EC. Biochemistry. 2001;40:7525. doi: 10.1021/bi002509c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bertini I, Lalli D, Mangani S, Pozzi C, Rosa C, Theil EC, Turano P. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:6169. doi: 10.1021/ja210084n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mertz JR, Theil EC. J Biol Chem. 1983;258:11719. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]