Abstract
The direct feeding of Jatropha meal containing phorbol esters (PEs) indicated mild to severe toxicity symptoms in various organs of different animals. However, limited information is available on cellular and molecular mechanism of toxicity caused by PEs present in Jatropha meal. Thus, the present study was conducted to determine the cytotoxic and mode of action of PEs isolated from Jatropha meal using human hepatocyte (Chang) and African green monkey kidney (Vero) cell lines. The results showed that isolated PEs inhibited cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner in both cell lines with the CC50 of 125.9 and 110.3 μg/mL, respectively. These values were compatible to that of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) values as positive control i.e., 124.5 and 106.3 μg/mL respectively. Microscopic examination, flow cytometry and DNA fragmentation results confirmed cell death due to apoptosis upon treatment with PEs and PMA at CC50 concentration for 24 h in both cell lines. The Western blot analysis revealed the overexpression of PKC-Δ and activation of caspase-3 proteins which could be involved in the mechanism of action of PEs and PMA. Consequently, the PEs isolated form Jatropha meal caused toxicity and induced apoptosis-mediated proliferation inhibition toward Chang and Vero cell lines involving over-expression of PKC-Δ and caspase-3 as their mode of actions.
Keywords: phorbol esters, Jatropha curcas, Jatropha meal, proliferation, toxicity, apoptosis, flow-cytometry, DNA fragmentation, western blot, infrared imaging system
Introduction
Jatropha curcas Linn. belongs to the Euphorbiaceae family. Currently, this plant has gained importance as the Jatropha seeds have been recognized to be a potential source of oil for biofuel production [1]. Upon oil extraction, a byproduct called Jatropha meal which is high in protein is produced. Jatropha meal has the potential as a feed ingredient for the animal industry [2]. However, the presence of phorbol esters (PEs) in some genotypes limits its applications as a feed constituent. Toxicity of Jatropha meal has been reported in different animals such as goats, sheep, mice, rats and fish [3,4]. Direct feeding of Jatropha meal containing PEs indicated mild to severe symptoms in various organs of different animals, like hemorrhage in the gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, spleen and heart; enteritis, congestion, lung edema and excessive fluid in serous cavities [5].
Phorbol ester is a member of the tigliane family of diterpenes. They are polycyclic compounds in which two hydroxyl groups on neighboring carbon atoms are esterified to fatty acid [6]. The phorbol-12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) is one of the PEs found in croton plant (Euphorbiaceae) and often employed in biomedical research to activate the signal transduction of protein kinase C (PKC) enzyme. Binding of PEs is the first step in the activation of PKC. This binding is saturable and occurs through specific interactions within the C1 domain in the regulatory region of the PKC molecule [7].
The PEs biological activities are strictly structure-dependent based on the functional groups present. Thus, different PEs may activate different PKC isozymes in the cells which could trigger different pathways leading to various responses including tumor formation, inflammation, differentiation and apoptosis in the animal tissues [8,9]. Hatton et al. [8] reported that PEs activate PKC-β I and II which regulate cells differentiation, PKC-ɛ which appears to regulate the expression of anti-apoptotic genes and PKC-Δ which is involved in both differentiation and apoptosis with the participation of caspase-3 protein.
Although the toxicity of the PEs present in Jatropha meal has been addressed previously, the mode of action of PEs from Jatropha meal still requires further investigation. Therefore, this research was conducted to determine the toxic effects and the mode of action of PEs isolated from Jatropha meal using human hepatocyte (Chang) and African green monkey kidney (Vero) cell lines.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Isolation of Phorbol Esters
High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of methanolic extract obtained from Jatropha meal showed four peaks at the mentioned retention times (Section 3.2) and they were named as PE1, PE2, PE3 and PE4 (Figure 1). These components which represented the PEs of Jatropha meal, have been reported by Makkar et al. [10], Li et al. [11] and recently by Devappa [4]. However, Hass et al. [12] characterized six PEs in J. curcas seeds, namely Jatropha factor C1–C6 which possessed the same diterpene moiety identified as 12-deoxy-16-hydroxyphorbol. The isolated PEs observed appeared to be different in their dicarboxylic acid moieties (bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane or cyclobutane unit) and to be C-8 epimers. In a recent study, Roach et al. [13] also characterized the PE1, PE2, PE3 and PE4 and reported them as Jatropha factor C1, C2, C3 mixture and C4 + C5 mixture, respectively. In the present study, the four fractions of PEs isolated were pooled since the focus was to evaluate the toxic effects of PEs present in Jatropha meal. The concentrations of the isolated PEs used in this study were expressed as equivalents to the standard phorbol-12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA). The total yield of PEs isolated from Jatropha meal was 3 mg PMA equivalent/g dry matter of Jatropha meal.
2.2. Proliferation Assay
The anti proliferation activity of isolated PEs and PMA as positive control in Chang and Vero cell lines are shown in Figures 2 and 3 respectively. Isolated PEs and PMA inhibited the cells proliferation significantly (p < 0.05) in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the Chang cells were less prone to the presence of PEs and PMA as compared to the Vero cells and the proliferation was only affected at 100 μg/mL and above. Mentlein et al. [14] and Goel et al. [9] previously reported the presence of phorbol ester hydrolyzing enzymes in the rat and mice liver such as acylcarnitine hydrolase and diacylglycerol lipase that degrade the PEs to their safe derivatives. Therefore, this resistance in Chang cells may be attributed to the presence of these enzymes.
The CC50 values presented in Table 1 show similar concentrations of PEs and PMA to inhibit the proliferation of 50% of the Chang and Vero cell lines. However, the CC50 values for Chang cells were significantly (p < 0.01) higher than that for Vero cells indicating the higher susceptibility of the cells to PEs and PMA. This result was in agreement with Li et al. [11] who reported the higher susceptibility of the lung and kidney when compared to other organs when mice were fed with phorbol ester-containing oil.
Table 1.
CC50 μg/mL | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
Chang | Vero | S.E.M | |
Isolated PEs | 125.9 a | 110.3 b | 2.79 |
PMA1 | 124.5 a | 106.3 b | 3.06 |
PMA: phorbol- 12-myristate 13-acetate; Analyses were done in triplicates; CC50: cytotoxic concentration that produced 50% cells death; Means within a row with different letter are significantly different (p < 0.01).
2.3. Microscopic Examination
The results of morphological changes visualized in both cell lines upon treatment with isolated PEs at CC50 concentration (C,D) after 24 h incubation are presented in Figure 4. Significant morphological changes, detachment and destruction of cells were observed upon treatment with PEs after 24 h incubation in both adherent cell lines.
According to these microscopic observations (Figure 4), cell damage resembled apoptosis as cell walls were not intact and apoptotic bodies were seen. The disruption in the integrity of the plasma membrane is one of the earliest features in apoptosis. Both cell lines displayed death upon treatment with the PEs at CC50 concentration at 24 h incubation. The cells subsequently detached completely over the following hours of incubation. The characteristics observed in this study were also reported by Bond et al.[15] who observed the detachment of human pancreatic adenocarcinomas cells upon 48 h exposure to PMA. Halaweish et al. [16] reported the changes in morphology, epidermal growth factor binding, arachidonic acid metabolite release and ornithine decarboxylase activity of the cells treated by plant ingenol and phorbol ester diterpenes.
2.4. Analysis of Apoptosis by Flow Cytometry
In order to confirm the apoptosis cell death, the cells were double stained with FITC Annexin V and PI (propidium iodide) and subjected to flow cytometry. Figure 5 shows the flow cytometry analyses of both cell lines treated with PEs and PMA upon 24 h incubation. The flow cytometry results confirmed that PEs isolated from Jatropha meal and also PMA induced apoptosis cell death upon 24 h exposure.
As observed in Figure 5, the untreated cells showed the lowest intensity in the absorption of FITC Annexin V and PI dyes due to the viability of the cells and presence of intact cell membrane. The early apoptotic cells showed higher intensity in absorption of FITC Annexin V. The translocation of phosphatidylserine (PS) from the inner to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane in the apoptotic cells, exposed the PS to the external cellular environment. The Annexin V labeled with a fluorescent FITC has a high affinity for PS. Thus, FITC Annexin V bound to the PS, indicating the cells undergoing apoptosis. The dead cells showed higher intensity in FITC Annexin V and PI as these dyes could easily pass through the disrupted cell walls and bound to the translocated PS and DNA respectively.
Table 2 shows the average of viable, apoptotic and dead cells percentage obtained from three independent experiments upon 24 h treatment analyzed by flow cytometry. These results showed that cells viability of Chang and Vero cell lines with values of 97.1% and 97.0% decreased significantly (p < 0.01) to 32.3% and 24.6% upon treatment with PEs and to 23.3 and 17.3 upon treatment with PMA respectively. The Chang and Vero cell lines showed 22.2% and 29.3% apoptotic cells upon treatment with PEs, while cells treated with PMA showed significantly (p < 0.01) higher values at 27.6% and 35.6%, respectively. These findings indicate that Chang cells were less prone to the effect of PEs and PMA as compared to the Vero cells and these results were consistent with the findings observed in the proliferation assay (Section 2.2). Although, the PEs appeared to be less active as compared to the PMA in induction of apoptosis, the percentage of dead cells indicated no significant difference between the cells treated with PEs and PMA. The difference in the potential of PMA and PEs in induction of apoptosis could probably due to the numbers or the position of functional groups present in PEs structures.
Table 2.
Chang Cells (%) | Vero Cells (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
Un-treated | PEs-treated | PMA-treated | Un-treated | PEs-treated | PMA-treated | S.E.M | |
Viable | 97.1 a | 32.3 b | 23.3 c | 97.0 a | 24.6 c | 17.3 d | 2.78 |
Apoptotic | 1.6 d | 22.2 c | 27.6 b | 2.0 d | 29.3 b | 35.6 a | 2.28 |
Dead | 2.0 b | 48.3 a | 51.6 a | 1.3 b | 50.6 a | 53.3 a | 3.47 |
Analyses were done in triplicates; At least 13,000 cells were analyzed by flow cytometry; Means with different superscripts within rows are significantly different (p < 0.01).
The role of PEs on induction of tumorgenesis, apoptosis, inflammation and survival of the cells depends on the type of activated PKC isozymes triggering different pathways. Indeed, emerging information suggests that PEs as PKC activators may induce apoptosis [6,7,17–19] or tumor formation [9,20,21]. The effects and mechanism of action of PEs depend on the types of phorbol ester, types of cell, time of exposure and the concentrations used. These factors may alter the balance between pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic pathways resulting in tumor or apoptosis of the cells.
2.5. DNA Fragmentation
The characteristics of apoptotic program involve certain morphologic features including loss of plasma membrane asymmetry and attachment, condensation of the cytoplasm and nucleus and internucleosomal cleavage of DNA. Isolated PEs and PMA induced nucleosome-size DNA fragmentation (Figure 6), a biochemical hallmark of apoptosis in the cells. The presence of DNA cleavage bands in cells treated with PEs indicated the similar cytotoxic effects of PEs to that of PMA. This result is in agreement with Day et al. [22] who observed changes in morphological features, apoptosis and endonuclease digestion of genomic DNA after 24 h incubation in LNCaP cells treated with PMA. Similarly, Rennecke et al. [23] have also found the DNA fragmentation in primary mouse thymocytes after prolonged treatment (>18 h) with PMA.
2.6. Western Blot Assay
As shown in Figures 7 and 8, PKC-Δ was significantly (p < 0.01) over-expressed in Chang and Vero cell lines upon 24 h treatment with isolated PEs and PMA. The results also showed the cleavage of caspase-3. The results were significantly (p < 0.01) higher than that of the control in both cell lines (Figures 7 and 8).
The individual roles of PKCs in the regulation of apoptosis have been reported in various cells. In most cells, PKC-α, ɛ and ι act as anti-apoptotic kinases, whereas PKC-β, μ and Δ act as pro-apoptotic kinases [24]. The over-expression of PKC-Δ observed in this study was in agreement with Fujii et al. [25] who observed the apoptosis in prostate cancer cells upon treatment with PMA which mediated through over-expression of PKC-Δ. Apart from that, Hatton et al. [8] also addressed the role of PKC-Δ in execution of caspase cascade proteins leading to apoptosis cell death.
In this study, activation of PKC-Δ probably led to the activation of caspase-3 protein. The observation of activated caspase-3 protein is considered as one of the hallmarks of apoptosis. The activation of caspase-3 protein in line with flow cytometry and DNA fragmentation results confirmed the apoptosis cells death when cells were treated with PEs and PMA. Similar observation was reported by Park et al. [26] who induced the apoptosis using PMA in gastric cancer cells through activation of PKC-Δ and finally execution of caspase-3 protein.
Phorbol esters exert a variety of effects in cellular systems that include proliferation, differentiation and cell death. The multiplicity effect of PEs on biological systems has been discussed by Rennecke et al. [23] and Harkin et al. [27]. Besides the type of PEs, another important factor is the time of exposure. They reported that, the anti-apoptotic effects of PEs in the cells are observed within the first 2–4 h upon treatment, while prolong exposure (>18 h) down-regulated the anti-apoptotic PKC species and up-regulated the pro-apoptotic PKC species.
The present study showed that isolated PEs from Jatropha meal initially disrupted the cell-substream adhesion without immediate loss of viability, subsequent cells detachment and finally death with apoptosis characteristics in Chang and Vero cell lines. This finding extended the information and revealed the cytotoxic effect of PEs as inhibitor of cell proliferation.
3. Experimental Section
3.1. Plant Materials
The Jatropha curcas L. plant was collected from the farm of Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia with the GPS location of 3°0′26.91″N latitude and 101°42′13.24″E longitude for identification by Mr. Shamsul Khamis. A voucher specimen (SK1764/2010) was deposited in the Phytomedicinal Herbarium, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. Upon confirmation of the plant, the mature J. curcas seeds were collected from the farm, air dried and dehulled. The kernel were ground by using a mechanical grinder followed by oil extraction with Soxhlet apparatus, using petroleum ether (boiling point of 40–60 °C), for 16 h [28]. Defatted kernel (Jatropha meal) was air dried at room temperature and kept in screw cap bottle at −20 °C.
3.2. Phorbol Esters Isolation
Phorbol esters from Jatropha meal were isolated according to Li et al. [11]. Briefly, 4 g of Jatropha meal was extracted five times using methanol ground in pestle and mortar. The methanol was evaporated by rotary evaporator. The crude methanolic extract was dissolved in 5 mL of methanol and an aliquot was loaded on a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) Waters Alliance 2695 Separations Module with a Waters 996 Photodiode Array Detector (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). It was equipped with the reverse-phase, C18 LiChrospher 100, 250 × 4 mm I.D and 5 μm pore size column (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The separation was performed using a gradient elution with solvents comprising deionized water and acetonitrile [2,10]. The absorbance was read at 280 nm and phorbol esters were carefully collected using a fraction collector (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at 24.4, 25.4, 26.4 and 26.9 min. The collected fractions were pooled and freeze dried. Isolated PEs were redissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and analyzed by HPLC to determine the purity and concentration. The concentration of the isolated PEs used in this study was expressed as equivalent to a standard, phorbol-12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA).
3.3. Cell Lines and Cell Culture
The human hepatocytes (Chang ATCC: CCL-13) and African green monkey kidney cells (Vero ATCC: CRL-1586) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Cells were grown as monolayers in a T-75 cm2 culture flask. The Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) was supplemented with 2.0 g/L sodium bicarbonate and 10% fetal bovine serum. The cell cultures were maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C and were harvested when they reached 80% confluency [29].
3.4. Proliferation Assay
Cell proliferation was determined using 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide (MTT) according to Sharif et al. [30]. Monolayers of the cells (5 × 103/100 μL) were grown in 96-well microtitre plates and treated with the isolated PEs from 200 μg to 50 μg/mL by serial dilution. After 24 h incubation at 37 °C, cells proliferation assay was determined based on the reduction of MTT by the mitochondrial dehydrogenase of intact cells into an insoluble purple formazan product. Phorbol-12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma) was used as a positive control.
3.5. Microscopic Examination
Cells were cultured and treated at CC50 concentration with isolated PEs and positive control. Morphological apoptotic changes were examined after 24 h incubation and photographed using a phase-contrast microscope [31].
3.6. Analysis of Apoptosis by Flow-Cytometry
A fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis was performed to detect apoptosis. The Chang and Vero cells were seeded at the density of l × 106 cells per 75 cm2 flask and cultured for 24 h in DMEM. Once confluent, the media were removed and fresh media containing PEs and PMA at the CC50 concentration were added. The treated cells were then incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 24 h. The FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to stain the cell, following the manufacturer's instructions. The stained cells were monitored by flow cytometry (FACS-Canto II BD Biosciences) and the data were analyzed using Diva software (BD Biosciences). Cells that were considered viable would be FITC Annexin V and PI negative, while cells in early apoptosis would be FITC Annexin V positive and PI negative, and cells in late apoptosis or already dead would be both FITC Annexin V and PI positive.
3.7. DNA Fragmentation Assay
Different cell lines were treated at CC50 concentration of PEs and PMA and incubated for 24 h. Cultured cells were harvested and washed by PBS and pelleted by centrifugation at 300× g for 10 min. DNA was extracted from cells using extraction buffer containing Na2HPO4 and citric acid followed by addition of RNase and proteinase K according to Darzynkiewicz and Juan [32]. The extracted DNA was loaded on 2% agarose gel, electrophoresed at 50 V for 3 h and stained with ethidium bromide.
3.8. Western Blotting
Expression of protein kinase C-Δ (PKC-Δ) and caspase-3 proteins were assessed by Western blot analysis. Briefly, cells were trypsinized, harvested and washed three times with cold PBS. Then the cells were lysed in 100 μL of Lysis buffer (0.5% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5) containing 10 μL/mL of Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (ProteoBlock Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, Fermentas, Glen Burnie, MD, USA) at 4 °C. Cells were then sonicated and incubated in ice for 20 min and supernatant collected after centrifuging at 14,000× g for 30 min. Protein concentration was determined in supernatant using the Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) and 20 μg of protein was denatured by incubation at 95 °C for 5 min and subjected to electrophoresis using Tris-glycine polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were transferred electrophoretically to a PVDF membrane using the Hoefer Semi-Dry Transfer Unit, (Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Francisco, CA, USA). After electroblot transfer of the protein, membranes were washed twice and incubated with Odyssey Blocking Buffer (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) for 1 h at room temperature with rocking to block non-specific antibody binding. Then the membrane was incubated overnight with a 1:1000 dilution of PKC-Δ (PAB18258 Abnova), 1:1000 dilution of GAPDH (Thermo Scientific MA1-4711) and 1:500 dilution of Caspase-3 (Biorbyt orb10237) primary antibodies. Membrane was washed with 0.05% PBST (phosphate buffer saline and Tween 20) three times for 5 min. For detection with the Odyssey imaging system, a 1:10000 dilution of the IRDye 800 CW Goat Anti-Rabbit Secondary Antibody or-IRDye 680 Goat Anti-Mouse Secondary Antibody was used. Membrane was washed with 0.05% PBST three times for 5 min. The membrane was dried and visualized using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) and Odyssey software was used to determine the intensity of the proteins band.
3.9. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using GLM procedure [33] using a complete randomized design following the model: Yi = μ + Ti + ei, where μ is the mean value, Ti is the treatment effect and ei is the experimental error, respectively. Differences in LSD were considered significant at p < 0.05. GraphPad Prism 5 software [27] was used for all the statistical analyses in Western blotting.
4. Conclusions
Phorbol esters isolated from Jatropha meal impaired the proliferation of human hepatocyte cells and kidney cells from African green monkey by induction of apoptosis. The PEs induced the over-expression of PKC-Δ and activation of caspase-3 proteins. The kidney cells appeared to be more susceptible to PEs as compared to the liver cells. These results were comparable to that of the PMA. Consequently, PEs present in Jatropha meal caused toxicity through apoptosis cell death and their complete removal is of prime importance when any dietary application of Jatropha meal is to be considered in the animal industry.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia for the grant provided under the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (Project No. 01-01-12-1095FR).
References
- 1.Murugesan A., Umarani C., Subramanian R., Nedunchezhian N. Bio-diesel as an alternative fuel for diesel engines—A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2009;13:653–662. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Oskoueian E., Abdullah N., Saad W.Z., Omar A.R., Puteh M.B., Ho Y.W. Anti-nutritional metabolites and effect of treated Jatropha curcas kernel meal on rumen fermentation in vitro. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2011;10:214–220. [Google Scholar]
- 3.King A.J., He W., Cuevas J.A., Freudenberger M., Ramiaramanana D., Graham I.A. Potential of Jatropha curcas as a source of renewable oil and animal feed. J. Exp. Bot. 2009;60:2897–2905. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Devappa R.K. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Hohenheim; Stuttgart, Germany: Ferburay. 2012. Isolation, Characterization and Potential Agro-Pharmaceutical Applications of Phorbol Esters from Jatropha curcas Oil. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rakshit K.D., Darukeshwara J., Rathina Raj K., Narasimhamurthy K., Saibaba P., Bhagya S. Toxicity studies of detoxified Jatropha meal (Jatropha curcas) in rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008;46:3621–3625. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Abdel-Hafez A., Nakamura N., Hattori M. Biotransformation of phorbol by human intestinal bacteria. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2002;50:160–164. doi: 10.1248/cpb.50.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Griner E.M., Kazanietz M.G. Protein kinase C and other diacylglycerol effectors in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2007;7:281–294. doi: 10.1038/nrc2110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hatton J.P., Gaubert F., Cazenave J.P., Schmitt D. Microgravity modifies protein kinase C isoform translocation in the human monocytic cell line U937 and human peripheral blood T-cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2002;87:39–50. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goel G., Makkar H., Francis G., Becker K. Phorbol esters: Structure, biological activity, and toxicity in animals. Int. J. Toxicol. 2007;26:279–288. doi: 10.1080/10915810701464641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Makkar H.P.S., Siddhuraju S., Siddhuraju P., Becker K. Plant Secondary Metabolites. Humana Press; New York, NY, USA: 2007. pp. 101–106. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li C.Y., Devappa R.K., Liu J.X., Lv J.M., Makkar H.P.S., Becker K. Toxicity of Jatropha curcas phorbol esters in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010;48:620–625. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Haas W., Sterk H., Mittelbach M. Novel 12-deoxy-16-hydroxyphorbol diesters isolated from the seed oil of Jatropha curcas. J. Nat. Prod. 2002;65:1434–1440. doi: 10.1021/np020060d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Roach J.S., Devappa R.K., Makkar H.P.S., Becker K. Isolation, stability and bioactivity of Jatropha curcas phorbol esters. Fitoterapia. 2012;83:586–592. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mentlein R. The tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol 13-acetate and regulatory diacylglycerols are substrates for the same carboxylesterase. J. Biol. Chem. 1986;261:7816–7818. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bond J.A., Gescher A.J., Verschoyle R.D., Lemoine N.R., Errington R., Wiltshire M., Smith P.J., Thomas D.W. Cytotoxic action of phorbol esters on human pancreatic cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer. 2007;121:1445–1454. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Halaweish F.T., Kronberg S., Hubert M.B., Rice J.A. Toxic and aversive diterpenes of Euphorbia esula. J. Chem. Ecol. 2002;28:1599–1611. doi: 10.1023/a:1019976413040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kazanietz M.G. Targeting protein kinase C and “non-kinase” phorbol ester receptors: Emerging concepts and therapeutic implications. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Proteonomics. 2005;1754:296–304. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gobbi G., Mirandola P., Carubbi C., Micheloni C., Malinverno C., Lunghi P., Bonati A., Vitale M. Phorbol ester-induced PKC down-modulation sensitizes AML cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis and cell differentiation. Blood. 2009;113:3080–3087. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-03-143784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Von Burstin V.A., Xiao L., Kazanietz M.G. Bryostatin 1 Inhibits phorbol ester-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells by differentially modulating protein kinase C (PKC) Δ translocation and preventing PKC Δ-Mediated release of tumor necrosis factor-α. Mol. Pharmacol. 2010;78:325–332. doi: 10.1124/mol.110.064741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shrotriya S., Kundu J.K., Na H.K., Surh Y.J. Diallyl trisulfide inhibits phorbol ester-induced tumor promotion, activation of AP-1, and expression of COX-2 in mouse skin by blocking JNK and AKT signaling. Cancer Res. 2010;70:1932–1940. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ikuta S., Edamatsu H., Li M., Hu L., Kataoka T. Crucial role of phospholipase Cɛ in skin inflammation induced by tumor-promoting phorbol ester. Cancer Res. 2008;68:64–72. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-3245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Day M., Zhao X., Wu S., Swanson P., Humphrey P. Phorbol ester-induced apoptosis is accompanied by NGFI-A and c-fos activation in androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cells. Cell Growth Differ. 1994;5:735–741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rennecke J., Richter K.H., Haussermann S., Stempka L., Strand S., Stohr M., Marks F. Biphasic effect of protein kinase C activators on spontaneous and glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in primary mouse thymocytes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell. Res. 2000;1497:289–296. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4889(00)00067-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hilario M.C., Puga C.D., Ocana A.N., Romo F.P.G. Antioxidant activity, bioactive polyphenols in Mexican goats’ milk cheeses on summer grazing. J. Dairy Res. 2010;77:20–26. doi: 10.1017/S0022029909990161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fujii T., Bermejo M.L.G., Bernabo J.L., Caamano J., Ohba M., Kuroki T., Li L., Yuspa S.H., Kazanietz M.G. Involvement of protein kinase C (PKC) in phorbol ester-induced apoptosis in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:7574–7582. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.11.7574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Park I.C., Park M.J., Rhee C.H., Lee J.I., Choe T.B., Jang J.J., Lee S.H., Hong S.I. Protein kinase C activation by PMA rapidly induces apoptosis through caspase-3/CPP32 and serine protease(s) in a gastric cancer cell line. Int. J. Oncol. 2001;18:1077–1083. doi: 10.3892/ijo.18.5.1077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.GraphPad Prism, version 5.01. GraphPad Software Inc.; San Diego, CA, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. AOAC; Washington, DC, USA: 1990. pp. 64–87. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Oskoueian E., Abdullah N., Ahmad S., Saad W.Z., Omar A.R., Ho Y.W. Bioactive compounds and biological activities of Jatropha curcas L. kernel meal extract. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011;12:5955–5970. doi: 10.3390/ijms12095955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sharif R., Ghazali A., Rajab N., Haron H., Osman F. Toxicological evaluation of some Malaysian locally processed raw food products. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008;46:368–374. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu B., Li C.Y., Bian H.J., Min M.W., Chen L.F., Bao J.K. Antiproliferative activity and apoptosis-inducing mechanism of Concanavalin A on human melanoma A375 cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2009;482:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Darzynkiewicz Z., Juan G. Selective Extraction of Fragmented DNA from Apoptotic Cells for Analysis by Gel Electrophoresis and Identification of Apoptotic Cells by Flow Cytometry. In: Henderson D.S., editor. DNA-Repair Protocols, Eukaryotic Systems. Vol. 113. Humana Press; New York, NY, USA: 1999. pp. 599–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.SAS, Statistical Analysis Institute, Version 9.1.3. SAS Institute Inc; Cary, NC, USA: 2003. [Google Scholar]