Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2012 Dec;194(24):7007. doi: 10.1128/JB.01798-12

Complete Sequence of the First Chimera Genome Constructed by Cloning the Whole Genome of Synechocystis Strain PCC6803 into the Bacillus subtilis 168 Genome

Satoru Watanabe a, Yuh Shiwa b, Mitsuhiro Itaya c,, Hirofumi Yoshikawa a,c,
PMCID: PMC3510552  PMID: 23209249

Abstract

Genome synthesis of existing or designed genomes is made feasible by the first successful cloning of a cyanobacterium, Synechocystis PCC6803, in Gram-positive, endospore-forming Bacillus subtilis. Whole-genome sequence analysis of the isolate and parental B. subtilis strains provides clues for identifying single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 2 complete bacterial genomes in one cell.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Amethod to connect small DNA segments in Bacillus subtilis, originally termed megacloning, enabled the combination of a whole genome from Synechocystis PCC6803 with the B. subtilis genome (3). When the project started in 1997, the sequence of the whole bacterial genome to be used was the minimal requirement for such an approach. This prerequisite, combined with the fact that the strain is not harmful to humans, led us to choose the Synechocystis PCC6803 strain for the project. The chimeric genome strain BEST7613 (3) has raised a number of poorly argued issues (1). To the best of our knowledge, growth of Synechocystis in a suitable medium, a complete synthetic medium for photosynthesis with no carbon sources, has not been achieved yet; therefore, BEST7613 must always be cultivated in a B. subtilis growth medium. Given that the genes from the Synechocystis genome are properly expressed, conversion of the cellular gene regulatory network from that of B. subtilis to that of the other partner is expected. A number of factors and components that were provided by a switch in gene expression from B. subtilis to Synechocystis in response to changes in the culture medium remain to be examined. These include structures on the inside and outside of the cell membrane and cell wall and the metabolic state. To obtain clues, sequence information on BEST7613 and its precursor, the B. subtilis strain BEST7003, was also determined.

The genomes were sequenced in a multiplexed, paired-end, 100-bp manner on a Genome Analyzer II (Illumina, San Diego, CA) to generate 60- and 80-fold coverage. De novo assemblies were performed using Velvet software version 1.1.02 (6). For the BEST7003 strain, 53 scaffolds were aligned to the B. subtilis 168 genome using MUMmer (4). For the BEST7613 strain, 243 scaffolds were sorted according to strain constriction procedures (3). The genome sequences of strains BEST7003 and BEST7613 consisted of 4,043,042 bp and 7,585,470 bp, respectively. A total of 4,011 (BEST7003) and 7,270 (BEST7613) genes were determined using the Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MiGAP) (http://www.migap.org/).

BEST7003 was constructed based on B. subtilis RM125 (3), which contains 2 rearrangements in its genome: the integration of the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens genome around the purB gene and the dislodgment of the SPβ phage region (2). Our sequence analysis revealed both rearrangements in the BEST7003 genome. We found 2 large deletions in the BEST7613 genome. The skin element was dislodged, leading to the reconstitution of the sigK gene. This phenomenon is caused by the sporulation process (5). We also found a deletion of the Synechocystis genome region (bp 1617467 to 1624268) containing sll1411 to sll2111. Since the region contains repetitive sequences, which includes 4 transposase genes, it may be reformed by homologous recombination. In addition, we found several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Synechocystis genome region, although there were no mutations that disrupted photosynthesis. A detailed report of these genomes will be included in future publications.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The genome sequences for these strains have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession numbers AP012496 (BEST7003) and AP012495 (BEST7613).

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This project was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [S0801025]).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Itaya M. 2009. Recombinant genomes: novel resources for systems biology and synthetic biology, p 155–194 In Fu P, Panke S. (ed), Systems biology and synthetic biology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Itaya M, Tanaka T. 1997. Predicted and unsuspected alterations of the genomes structure of genetically defined Bacillus subtilis 168 strains. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 61:56–64 [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Itaya M, Tsuge K, Koizumi M, Fujita K. 2005. Combining two genomes in one cell: stable cloning of the Synechocystis PCC6803 genome in the Bacillus subtilis 168 genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:15971–15976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kurtz S, et al. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5:R12 doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Stragier P, Kunkel B, Kroos L, Losick R. 1989. Chromosomal rearrangement generating a composite gene for a developmental transcription factor. Science 243:507–512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18:821–829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES