Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1982 May;36(2):710–713. doi: 10.1128/iai.36.2.710-713.1982

Transovarian passage, visceral distribution, and pathogenicity of salmonella in snakes.

R J Chiodini
PMCID: PMC351288  PMID: 7044975

Abstract

Transovarian passage of salmonella was evaluated in snakes by cesarean delivery and subsequent bacteriological examination of fetuses. In all cases, the same Salmonella serotype was isolated from the feces of gravid females and their fetuses. The visceral distribution of salmonella in normal snakes was found to involve almost all visceral organs. Of nonenteric organs examined, salmonella was recovered most often from the livers and ureters. Experimental infections with Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella arizonae were established by oral, intracardial, and intracoelomic routes. Animals infected orally shed the organism in feces, but did not develop humoral antibodies or any detectable adverse effect. Animals injected by the intracardiac and intracoelomic routes developed antibody titers of 1:256 to the respective salmonella serotypes, but remained normal throughout the experiment. On the basis of results, salmonella was regarded as an opportunistic organism in reptiles.

Full text

PDF
710

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cambre R. C., Green D. E., Smith E. E., Montali R. J., Bush M. Salmonellosis and arizonosis in the reptile collection at the National Zoological Park. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1980 Nov 1;177(9):800–803. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chiodini R. J., Sundberg J. P. Cesarean delivery in the snake. Vet Med Small Anim Clin. 1980 Oct;75(10):1605–1608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chiodini R. J., Sundberg J. P. Salmonellosis in reptiles: a review. Am J Epidemiol. 1981 May;113(5):494–499. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen N. Reptiles as models for the study of immunity and its phylogenesis. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1971 Dec 1;159(11):1662–1671. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dimow I., Slawtschew R. Versuche der Experimentalinfizierung von Schlangen Vipera ammodytes ammodytes mit Salmonella- und Arizonabakterien. Pathol Microbiol (Basel) 1967;30(4):494–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dimow I. Versuche zur künstlichen Infektion von Eidechsen (Lacerta muralis) mit Salmonella- und Arizonabakterien. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1966 Oct;13(6):587–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dimow I. Versuche, Landschildkröten der Arten Testudo Graeca und Testudo Hermanni mit Salmonellabakterien zu infizieren. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1966 Feb;199(2):181–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaufmann A. F., Fox M. D., Morris G. K., Wood B. T., Feeley J. C., Frix M. K. Turtle-associated salmonellosis. 3. The effects of environmental salmonellae in commercial turtle breeding ponds. Am J Epidemiol. 1972 Jun;95(6):521–528. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaufmann A. F., Morrison Z. L. An epidemiologic study of salmonellosis in turtles. Am J Epidemiol. 1966 Sep;84(2):364–370. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES