Summary
This study was designed to test the hypothesis that specific inhibition of cathepsins B and L will cause death of neuroblastoma cells. Five compounds that differ in mode and rate of inhibition of these two enzymes were all shown to cause neuroblastoma cell death. Efficacy of the different compounds was related to their ability to inhibit the activity of the isolated enzymes. A dose- and time-response for induction of cell death was demonstrated for each compound. A proteomic study showed that inhibitor treatment caused an increase of markers of cell stress, including induction of levels of the autophagy marker, LC-3-II. Levels of this marker protein were highest at cytotoxic inhibitor concentrations, implicating autophagy in the cell death process. An in vivo mouse model showed that one of these inhibitors markedly impaired tumor growth. It is concluded that development of drugs to target these two proteases may provide a novel approach to treating neuroblastoma.
Keywords: Neuroblastoma, Cathepsin, Inhibitor, Autophagy
Introduction
Neuroblastoma is a unique cancer of childhood. Unlike most adult cancers that are caused by mutations that lead to de-differentiation and uncontrolled growth of cells, neuroblastoma is a developmental defect caused by failure of neural crest cells to differentiate into cells of the adrenal glands and peripheral nervous system[1,2]. Prognosis for infants is generally good and infants with a unique stage 4S neuroblastoma require little or no treatment and metastasized tumors spontaneously regress. It appears that although differentiation of neuroblasts in these patients is delayed, the tumors ultimately regress due to differentiation or apoptosis. The concept of inducing differentiation has led to the use of retinoic acid in treatment regimens for neuroblastoma[3]. Currently, the prognosis for patients who are diagnosed with metastatic neuroblastoma when they are two years or older is poor, with 5-year survival rates below 50%. In patients with poor prognosis, tumor cell proliferation continues and genetic instability leads to more aggressive disease. Subsets of neuroblastoma develop discrete genetic abnormalities such as N-myc amplification[4] and ALK activation mutations[5], some of which may lead to new treatments for sub-sets of patients[1].
A significant barrier to developing new therapeutics for children with cancer is the low numbers of patients compared to the much larger incidence of cancers in adults. Consequently identification of common features of abnormally proliferating neuroblasts may provide better targets for development of treatments for neuroblastoma. In a major breakthrough, an immunotherapy that targets a neuroblast cell surface marker, ganglioside GD2, has shown a dramatic improvement in survival for advanced stage neuroblastoma patients [6]. There are significant side-effects due to expression of the marker on normal nerve cells, but the associated pain can be controlled by medication. This study clearly demonstrates the value and efficacy of targeting features that are common to all neuroblastoma tumors. We have developed a hypothesis that targeting two lysosomal proteases, cathepsins B and L, may offer a novel approach to treating neuroblastoma. Deletion of cathepsins B or L in mice causes no overt neurological defect whereas deletion of both enzymes results in rapid on-set neurodegeneration shortly after birth[7]. Induction of cell death is restricted to cells of the nervous system and proliferating granule cells within the cerebellum are particularly affected[7]. An inhibitor of cathepsins B and L, Z-Phe-Ala-CHN2, specifically causes apoptosis of neuroepithelial and neural crest cells in developing embryos[8]. Lack of embryonic defects in cathepsin B and L knockout animals may be due to compensatory effects of one or more of the 8 additional cathepsins that are uniquely expressed in the rodent placenta[9,10]. After the proliferative stage of neuronal development, cathepsin inhibition is well tolerated. Inhibitors of cathepsins B and L have no significant toxicity to mature rodent cells and tissues[11,12], and actually protect mature brain tissue from ischemia[13]. For neuronal tissue development, the neonatal stage in mice corresponds to the third trimester fetal stage in humans [14,15] so specific inhibition of cathepsins B and L may selectively cause death of abnormally proliferating neuronal cells, sparing maturing neuronal cells and non-neuronal proliferating cells. We have shown that the cathepsin B and L inhibitor Fmoc-Tyr-Ala-CHN2 (FYAD) specifically causes apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells[16]. In this study we show that a range of cathepsin inhibitors cause death of neuroblastoma cells and that ability to induce cell death is directly related to ability of each compound to inhibit cathepsins B and L and induce accumulation of the marker of autophagy, LC3-II. The potential value of targeting cathepsins B and L to treat neuroblastoma is supported by a preclinical in vivo model.
Materials and Methods
Neuroblastoma cell lines
Neuroblastoma cell lines SK-N-SH and IMR-32 were maintained in Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) supplemented with 1% final concentrations of non-essential amino acids and sodium pyruvate, and contained a 10% final concentration of fetal bovine serum (FBS).
Cathepsin inhibitors
FYAD is a specific irreversible inhibitor of cathepsins B and L developed in the Mason lab[17,18] and now available from Bachem (Torrance, CA). (3R,6S,8R)-8-(4-Bromophenyl)-6-(2-fluoro-2-methylpropyl)-5-oxo-8-(trifluoromethyl)-1-thia-4,7-diazacycloundec-9-yne-3-carbonitrile (U.S. patent application 12/532,652, L-264); N-(1-(((cyanomethyl)amino)carbonyl)cyclohexyl)-4-(2-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)benzamide (L-006235)[11]; and N-(1-(((cyanomethyl)amino)carbonyl)-2-ethyl-(3,5dimethylbenzyl))-4-(2-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)benzamide (L-625) were a gift from M. David Percival (Merck-Frosst, Canada). N-methyl-piperazine-Phe-homoPhe-vinylsulfone-phenyl (K11777) was a gift from James McKerrow (University of California, San Francisco). Chemical structures of the inhibitors are shown (Fig 1).
Fig. 1.
Structures of cathepsin-inhibitory compounds. Fmoc-Tyr-Ala-diazomethane (FYAD) is a specific irreversible inhibitor of cathepsins B and L. L-006235, L-625 and L-264 are reversible inhibitors of cathepsins K, B and L. Each has a – CN group that binds tightly and reversibly to the active site cysteine of the enzymes. L-264 is a macrocyclic compound that was designed to improve stability and bioavailability of a cathepsin K inhibitor, but the modification reduced selectivity for cathepsin K over cathepsins B and L. K11777 a vinyl sulfone that, like FYAD, reacts covalently with the active site cysteine of cathepsins B and L.
Quantitative assessments of cell viability
Cathepsin inhibitor-induced cytotoxicity was measured using the cell titer blue viability assay (Promega, Madison, WI). Neuroblastoma cells were cultured in 24-well or 96-well plates. Cells seeded at 50% confluence were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h to allow cell attachment to plates. Inhibitors or vehicle controls were then added and cells were cultured for up to 8 more days. Media was changed every 3 days. At each time point, cell titer blue (5μl of 1:5 PBS-diluted reagent per 100 μl media, equivalent to 1% final concentration) was added to each well and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. Fluorescence intensity was then measured (535/595 nm, excitation/emission). Data shown are representative of the mean +/− standard deviation (SD) for multiple samples with statistical significance calculated using two-tailed type-two Student’s t-test.
Western blotting
Total cellular proteins were dissolved in 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 1% chaps lysis buffer supplemented with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and/or protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails diluted to 1X (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO). Equal amounts of protein (20–30 μg/lane) were separated by SDS/PAGE electrophoresis and were transferred onto Immobilon-P PVDF membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA). Proteins were identified by immunoblotting with the following antibodies: β-actin (A5441, Sigma, St Louis, MO), calreticulin (56259, QED Biosciences, San Diego, CA), Gp-96 (36–2600, Invitrogen, S. San Francisco, CA) and LC-3 (3868, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA). Western blot membranes were probed with anti-β-actin antibodies as a control for protein loading. A solution consisting of 200 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS and 1% Tween-20 at pH 2.2 was used to strip membranes prior to re-probing with different primary antibodies.
Cell Fractionation
Cells were broken by homogenization in 250 mM sucrose, 5 mM Tris, 1 mM MgCl2, pH 7.2 in a glass Potter-type homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at 1500 g and 4°C for 2 min. The pellet was washed in fresh sucrose solution to improve purity of the nuclear pellet. The supernatant was re-centrifuged to pellet contaminating nuclear components and then centrifuged at 3000 g and 4°C for 15 min. The pellet from this centrifugation was washed with sucrose to obtain dense granules. The supernatant was re-centrifuged to pellet contaminating dense granules to obtain a cytosol fraction with low density endosomes.
DIGE analysis of proteins
SK-N-SH cells were treated with 5 μM FYAD for 2 days. Treated and control cells from either whole cell lysates and dense granules from treated and control cells were dissolved in DIGE lysis buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5) and labeled with dyes as described previously[19]. Control and FYAD treated samples labeled with different dyes from either whole cells or dense granules were combined and then separated by 2D gel electrophoresis. Protein spots were quantified by scanning on a Typhoon Trio Scanner and by use of DeCyder 2-D Differential Analysis Software 6.5 to determine changes in levels of proteins.
Trypsin Digestion and Mass Spectrometry
Spots of interest were removed from the gel with a OneTouch Plus Spotpicker. Excised spots were digested with trypsin as described previously[19]. Tryptic peptides were isolated and concentrated using C18 ZipTips (Millipore, Billerica, MA) prior to spotting onto MALDI plates in matrix solution (5 mg/ml α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, 70% ACN, 0.1% TFA). Mass analysis was determined on ABI 4700 MALDI/TOF-TOF Proteomics Analyzer and proteins identified using Mascot software. Only proteins identified with a minimum Mascot score of 100 and 95% confidence are listed.
Xenograft model of neuroblastoma
SCID hairless sho strain code 474 mice were injected s.c. with 107 SK-N-SH cells. After 35 days, tumors were injected twice daily with FYAD (25 mg/kg/day) in 100 μl hydroxypropyl beta cyclodextrin (HPD) solution (45% HPD, 10% DMSO in PBS) or vehicle control for 10 consecutive days. This dose was at the limit of solubility of FYAD for a 100 μl injection. Tumors were measured with calipers and tumor volume calculated using a modified ellipsoid formula 1/2(Length × Width2). The experiment was terminated 20 days after initiation of treatment when tumors in control animals approached a volume of 1000 mm3. In separate experiments, balb/c mice were treated with FYAD or vehicle control (25 mg/kg) and then tissues extracted 6 h later to measure residual activity of cathepsins B and L using Z-Phe-Arg-NHMec substrate [20]. All experiments were approved under IACUC protocol # NBR-2005–006.
Results
Both reversible and irreversible inhibitors of cathepsins B and L decrease neuroblastoma cell viability
Reversible nitrile inhibitors originally developed in a program to target cathepsin K as a potential treatment for osteoporosis show a concentration and time dependent effect on viability of neuroblastoma cells (Fig 2). We determined the dose of inhibitors required to cause 50% death of SK-N-SH cells after 72 h of exposure for L-006235, L-625, L-264, K11777 and FYAD to be 180, 15, 16, 22 and 10 μM, respectively. L-006235, which is a tight binding inhibitor of cathepsin K (IC50 0.2 nM) that binds weakly to cathepsins B and L (IC50 1.1 and 6.3 μM, respectively)[12], only caused cell death at high concentrations (over 100 μM). Furthermore, after 8 days of treatment with 180 μM L-006235, viable SK-N-SH cells still remained (Fig 2C). L-625, a tighter binding inhibitor of cathepsins B and L (IC50 5.1 and 32 nM, respectively, M. David Percival, unpublished results) was much more effective against SK-N-SH cells, with the majority of cells dying after 3 days treatment with 50 μM inhibitor (Fig 2B). L-264, a non-basic inhibitor of cathepsins B and L (IC50 10 and 1.3 nM, respectively) was even more effective against SK-N-SH cells (Fig 2A). K11777, an irreversible inhibitor of cathepsins B and L that is currently being pursued as a potential treatment for Chagas disease by targeting structurally related parasitic proteases[21,22], also caused time- and concentration-dependent death of SK-N-SH cells (Fig 2D). All five inhibitors also caused cell death of the N-myc amplified neuroblastoma cell line, IMR-32 (Fig 2F and data not shown).
Fig. 2.
Concentration and time-dependent effect of cathepsin inhibitors on neuroblastoma cell survival. A–E, Left: SK-N-SH cells were treated with L-264, L-625, K11777 or FYAD at 10–50 μM, with L-006235 at 100–300 μM or with DMSO vehicle control at 0.5%. A–E, Right: SK-N-SH cells were treated with L-264, L-625, L-006235, K11777, FYAD, or with DMSO vehicle control (0.22%) at approximated 72 h LD50 doses (16, 15, 180, 22 and 10 μM, respectively). F: IMR-32 cells were treated with L-264 or L-625 (12.5–50 μM) or with DMSO vehicle control (0.5%). Media supplemented with individual inhibitors or with vehicle control was replaced every 3 days. At the end of incubation, viability was measured using cell titer blue. Graphical analysis represent mean +/− standard deviation (SD) of quintuplicate (A–E, Left), octuplicate (A–E, Right) or quadruplicate (F) samples with readings normalized to vehicle control values. All inhibitors induced significant cellular death compared to cells treated with vehicle control at all concentrations (p < 0.001).
Proteomic analysis of proteins accumulating in cells and dense granules after inhibition of cathepsins B and L
In our original study showing that FYAD specifically caused apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells, electron microscopy showed accumulation of dense organelles[16]. FYAD treatment resulted in accumulation of several markers of cell stress, including heat shock proteins and chaperones (Table 1). These proteins were elevated within 48 h of inhibitor treatment, prior to induction of apoptosis of cells[16]. Cytoskeletal proteins such as actin, vimentin, tropomyosin and tubulin were less affected. Similar proteins were elevated in the dense organelles isolated from FYAD treated cells (Table 2). Two of these proteins, calreticulin and GP-96, are endoplasmic reticulum proteins that are primarily found in the cytosol/low density organelle fraction from untreated SK-N-SH cells (Fig 3). Levels of both proteins are enriched in FYAD-treated cells and a significant portion of the proteins are found in the dense organelle fraction.
Table 1.
Changes in levels of proteins from whole cells. Proteins from DIGE gels were picked, digested with trypsin and identified by MALDI MS/MS. Fold change in proteins from FYAD treated cells compared to untreated cells are shown. For proteins represented by more than one spot, a range is shown.
| Protein Name | Fold Change |
|---|---|
| BIP protein | 4.4 |
| GP-96 | 3.6 |
| HSP 70 | 1.5–3.4 |
| HSP 60 | 3.4 |
| protein disulphide isomerase | 2.9 |
| calreticulin | 2.7 |
| prohibitin | 2.7 |
| ubiquitin carboxyl terminal esterase L1 | 2.4 |
| calumenin | 2.4 |
| prolyl 4-hydroxylase | 2.4 |
| lactate dehydrogenase | 2.0 |
| nucleoside diphosphate kinase 1 | 1.9 |
| triose phosphate isomerase | 1.8 |
| annexin V | 1.7 |
| tropomyosin | 1.1–1.4 |
| gamma actin | 1.3–1.4 |
| tyrosine 3-monooxygenase | 1.3 |
| tubulin | 1.1 |
| transitional ER ATPase | −1.1 |
| HSP 90 | −1.3 |
| vimentin | −1.3–−1.8 |
Table 2.
Changes in levels of proteins in dense granules. Dense granules were isolated from FYAD treated and control cells and proteins compared by DIGE. Spots were picked, digested with trypsin and identified by MALDI MS/MS. Fold change in proteins from FYAD treated cells compared to untreated cells are shown. For proteins represented by more than one spot, a range is shown.
| Protein Name | Fold Change |
|---|---|
| HSP 70 | 3.5 |
| protein disulphide isomerase | 3.4 |
| HSP 60 | 1–3.4 |
| BIP protein | 3.3 |
| GP-96 | 3.3 |
| glucosidase II | 2.2 |
| lactate dehydrogenase | 2.1 |
| ATP synthase | 2.0 |
| protein disulphide isomerase | 1.9 |
| tubulin | 1.8 |
| tropomyosin | 1.5 |
| eef-2 | 1.4 |
| gamma actin | −1.5–1.4 |
| vimentin | −1.4 |
| eif-4a1 | −1.8 |
Fig. 3.

Expression of proteins in cells and dense fractions after FYAD treatment. Dense organelles were prepared from control and FYAD treated cells for western blot analysis. Relative levels of expression of Cathepsin B, two of the proteins found to increase after FYAD treatment in the proteomic study (calreticulin and GP96), LC-3 and β-actin were determined in treated and control cells. 50 μg protein was loaded for each lane. Control and treated samples were separated on the same gel and transferred to the same blot to ensure that intensity of images reflects relative protein levels in the different samples. W represents whole cell protein; N, nuclear fraction; D, dense organelle fraction; and C, cytosol/light organelle fraction.
Induction of autophagy by five different cathepsin inhibitors
Overall levels of cathepsin B are not significantly altered, although levels of the single chain form of the enzyme are increased relative to the heavy chain of the cleaved two-chain form of the enzyme as a result of FYAD treatment (Fig 3). Levels and cellular distribution of β-actin do not change upon FYAD treatment (Fig 3). Electron microscopic analysis of inhibitor treated cells had previously shown accumulation of double membrane compartments resembling autophagosomes[16] so we also probed the western blots for LC-3. On induction of autophagy, the C-terminus of LC-3 is lipidated, resulting in a product that migrates faster than the unprocessed protein in SDS/PAGE[23]. Control cells contained low levels of the unprocessed protein that was isolated in the cytosol/low density organelle fraction (Fig 3). FYAD treatment caused accumulation of the processed protein, most of which was found in the dense organelle or crude nuclear fractions. Increased levels of lipidated LC-3 were dependent on concentrations of inhibitors used in both SK-N-SH and IMR32 cells (Fig 4). All five inhibitors caused accumulation of modified LC-3 in both cell lines (Fig 4). Thus five different compounds that inhibit cathepsins B and L by three different mechanisms all have the same effect on neuroblastoma cells, causing cell death and accumulation of markers of autophagy.
Fig. 4.
Expression of LC-3 in inhibitor treated neuroblastoma cells. A–B: Cells were treated with L-264 or L-625 (12.5–50μM), FYAD (10 μM), or with DMSO vehicle control (0.5%). C–D: Cells were treated with L-264, L-625, L-006235, K11777, FYAD, or with DMSO vehicle control (0.22%) at approximated 72 h LD50 doses (16, 15, 180, 22 and 10 μM, respectively). Media supplemented with individual inhibitors or with vehicle control was replaced every 3 days. E: Cells were treated as indicated (L-264 at 25 μM, L-625 at 35 μM, L-006235 at 180 μM, K11777 at 22 μM, FYAD at 10 μM or with DMSO at 0.35%). After 3 (A,B,E) or 6 (C,D) days total cellular lysates were collected and steady-state levels of LC-3 were determined by western blotting. β-actin was used as a loading control. Levels of lipidated LC-3 (LC-3-II) were augmented by all inhibitors in both neuroblastoma cell types.
Cathepsin inhibition and arrest of tumor growth in vivo
Treatment of sub-cutaneous tumors with FYAD twice daily for 10 days arrested tumor growth (Fig 5). During time of injections, measurement of tumor volume by calipers was complicated by the effect of injection volume at the tumor site and significant differences in volume were not detected in control and treated animals. However, after cessation of treatment, tumor volumes were significantly lower in treated animals than controls at all time-points. In separate experiments, tissues from treated and control animals were excised 6 h after administration of inhibitor to determine the effect of treatment on enzyme activity. In liver, kidney and brain tissue, cathepsin activity was inhibited by 72 +/− 12%, 72 +/− 7%, and 5 +/− 3%, respectively. This indicates that in vivo, FYAD inhibits cathepsin activity by over 70% but is not effective against proteases in brain.
Fig. 5.
Effect of FYAD on tumor growth in vivo: 107 SK-N-SH cells were injected subcutaneously into two groups of 10 hairless/SCID mice. When the first tumors were visible, vehicle or FYAD was injected at the tumor site and tumors measured daily with calipers. Tumors were significantly smaller in treated animals (* p<0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Discussion
Although neuroblastoma is a unique pediatric cancer, current therapies were originally developed for more common adult cancers and adapted for use in children. Unfortunately the major cytotoxic chemotherapies have severe side-effects in developing children and the response of children with advanced neuroblastoma to current therapies is poor. We found that an inhibitor of both cathepsins B and L, FYAD, caused selective cell death of neuroblastoma cells[16]. The primary goal of this study was to more rigorously test the hypothesis that inhibition of cathepsins B and L causes cell death in neuroblastoma cells using compounds that are already being developed in programs targeting similar enzymes as new therapeutic approaches to treat other ailments.
Efficacy of compounds in causing cell death is related to efficiency of cathepsin inhibition
L-006235 was the least effective inhibitor in causing death of SK-N-SH cells. This might be expected because although the IC50 for L-006235 for cathepsin K is 0.2 nM, it is a much weaker inhibitor of cathepsins B and L with IC50 of 1and 6 μM, respectively[24]. L-625 and L-264, are much tighter binding inhibitors of cathepsins B and L, with IC50s in the nanomolar range. These two compounds caused neuroblastoma cell death at lower concentrations than needed for L-006235. K11777, an irreversible inhibitor that reacts with mammalian cathepsins B and L, was similar to FYAD in its ability to cause death of neuroblastoma cells. Thus the comparative sensitivity of neuroblastoma cells to these compounds corresponded to the relative ability of each to hinder the activity of cathepsins B and L in vitro.
We have shown that complete inhibition (i.e. 100%) of both cathepsins B and L is achieved within 2–3 h after addition of the irreversible inhibitor, FYAD (10 μM) to cultured cells[25]. For irreversible inhibitors, even very low concentrations of inhibitors should eventually block activity of cathepsins B and L, with steady-state levels of activity depending upon rate of inactivation and rate of synthesis of new enzyme. By reducing the concentration of FYAD and measuring residual cathepsin activity, it was shown that at least 90% inhibition of cathepsins must be achieved to cause SK-N-SH cell death[16]. The effectiveness of enzyme inhibition in vivo by reversible inhibitors is more difficult to determine. Cathepsin concentrations in lysosomes can be in the millimolar range[25], so mechanisms for increasing compound concentration in lysosomes are required to ensure effectiveness of reversible inhibitors. It has been shown that L-006235 competes with binding of cathepsins B and L to an irreversible inhibitor in vivo even though it binds weakly to these enzymes in vitro[12]. It was proposed that protonation of this compound could cause its accumulation in lysosomes, thereby increasing lysosomal concentration of inhibitor and subsequent inhibition of enzyme. However L-625, a tighter binding analog of L-006235 that can also be protonated, was no more effective in cell death induction than L-264 that is a similar tight-binding inhibitor that cannot be protonated in acidic conditions.
For tight binding reversible inhibitors, if diffusion equilibration across the cell into the lysosome results in a lysosomal inhibitor concentration that is significantly higher than its Ki, retention by protonation may not be as significant as retention by tight binding to enzymes. Binding to enzymes will reduce the concentration of free inhibitor and consequently diffusion equilibration will result in a net influx of inhibitor into the lysosome. If steady-equilibrium is achieved, 90% of the activity of cathepsins B and L will be inhibited by 60 μM L-006235, which is similar to the concentration required to cause death of SK-N-SH cells experimentally. The calculated concentrations of L-625 and L-264 needed to cause 90% enzyme inhibition are 300 and 100 nM, respectively. Significantly higher concentrations were required to cause cell death by these two inhibitors. For these tight binding reversible inhibitors, the rate at which inhibitor diffuses into the lysosome may be the limiting step that prevents efficient enzyme inhibition. At lower concentrations, efficiency of inhibition of enzymes in lysosomes is probably regulated by a balance between slow rates of entry into lysosomes and synthesis of new enzyme, as proposed to explain incomplete inhibition of cathepsin B by low concentrations of the irreversible inhibitor FYAD[16]. The complex process of partitioning of inhibitors between extracellular compartments and sites of enzyme function will play a critical role in bioavailability and efficacy of inhibitors for treatment of neuroblastoma.
Efficacy of compounds in causing cell death is related to effect on autophagy
Proteomic studies showed that cell death was preceded by induction of markers of cell stress and autophagy. Efficacy of each inhibitor of cathepsins B and L in causing cell death corresponded with appearance of LC3-II, the lipidated form of LC-3, a key step in the formation of autophagosomes[26,27]. Treatment of cells with chloroquine and related compounds also results in up-regulation of markers of autophagy but these weak bases increase lysosomal pH and are proposed to result in leakage of lysosomal membranes, enabling lysosomal enzyme activity in the cytosol or nucleus to lead to cell death [28,29]. We did not previously find any evidence of lysosomal leakage by protease inhibition [16] but rather see accumulation of dense organelles that contain markers of cell stress and autophagy. Autophagy was originally discovered as a mechanism of cell survival during periods of nutrient deprivation but has more recently been recognized to be involved in cell death [30]. Although inhibition of cathepsins results in accumulation of markers of autophagy, the cells are not under starvation conditions and cathepsin inhibition prevents degradation of proteins to provide amino acid nutrients. Consequently the initial effect of inhibition of cathepsins B and L will be to prevent turnover of proteins that are sequestered during constitutive autophagy. Accumulation of un-degraded proteins precedes induction of apoptosis [16], indicating that this perturbation of autophagy may be an early effect that ultimately leads to death. We conclude that the mechanism of selective neuroblastoma cell death by cathepsin inhibition is more likely due to perturbation of processing of as yet unidentified proteins in the lysosomal/autophagy pathway rather than a direct action of cathepsins released into the cytosol or a direct effect of cathepsin inhibition on apoptosis or induction of autophagy. Identification of the critical protein targets that accumulate and cause selective death of neuroblastoma cells would help understand the relationship between autophagy and cell death.
Cathepsin inhibition reduces neuroblastoma cell growth in vivo
FYAD was shown to inhibit growth of neuroblastoma tumors in a xenograft mouse model. FYAD inhibited activity of cathepsins B and L in mouse liver and kidney but does not appear to readily cross the blood brain barrier to inhibit cathepsins in the central nervous system. Neuroblastoma is derived from cells that normally develop into the peripheral nervous system and tumors rarely migrate into the CNS. Although tumor growth was impaired, the treatment protocol did not result in eradication of tumors. Cathepsin activity was inhibited by approximately 70% in vivo but our in vitro studies indicated that more than 90% inhibition is required to induce cell death [16]. Thus although a level of inhibition sufficient to reduce cell growth could be achieved, compounds that have better pharmacokinetic properties than FYAD are probably needed to eradicate neuroblastoma tumors.
The mechanism by which FYAD inhibited tumor growth in these in vivo experiments is not clear. Post-mortem examination of tissues failed to show accumulation of markers of autophagy (LC3-II) or apoptosis (cleaved PARP), supporting our in vitro observations that a higher degree of cathepsin inhibition is required to induce these effects [16]. The primary effect of FYAD in vivo appears to be slow tumor growth. Cathepsin inhibition restricts growth of many cancer cell types both in vitro and in vivo and may be caused by effects on cell proliferation, tumor cell invasion or angiogenesis [31–34]. While targeting these processes may provide a therapeutic approach to control tumor progression, there remains a need to develop therapies that cause selective cell death of cancer cells.
Inhibitors for cathepsins B and L for potential clinical use
The effect of FYAD on neuroblastoma cells both in vivo and in vitro provides proof of concept that inhibition of cathepsins B and L offers a potential novel therapeutic approach to treat neuroblastoma. A major limitation of this compound is its limited solubility that prevents complete enzyme inhibition in vivo. The panel of inhibitors used in this study was chosen because their bioavailability and efficacy have already been demonstrated in other clinical and preclinical programs that target similar proteases. The reversible nitrile inhibitors have been developed in a program to target cathepsin K to treat osteoporosis. A related specific inhibitor of cathepsin K is currently in phase 3 clinical trials[35]. K11777, an irreversible peptidyl vinyl sulfone inhibitor, is being developed to target cathepsin-like proteases of Trypanosoma cruzi as a novel treatment for Chagas disease [22]. Unlike standard chemotherapeutic approaches, these cathepsin inhibitors show remarkably low toxicity in pre-clinical animal studies and clinical trials [36,12]. Adoption of compounds from therapeutic studies that are already in clinical trials may accelerate the development of a new treatment for neuroblastoma. Further development of compounds such as K11777 or the cathepsin K inhibitor analogs may provide drugs with better pharmacokinetics and become effective treatments for neuroblastoma.
Acknowledgments
Financial support for this research was provided by Nemours Research Programs, National Institutes of Health Grant 8P20GM103464, National Institutes of Health Grant P20RR016472 and Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation. We wish to thank Matthew R. England for initial assistance in proteomic studies, Dr. M. David Percival (Merck Frosst Centre for Therapeutic Research, Quebec, Canada) for generously providing the L-006235, L-625, and L-264 cathepsin inhibitory compounds and Dr. James McKerrow (University of California, San Francisco) for kindly providing cathepsin inhibitory agent K11777 and the rest of our colleagues for helpful discussions.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Statement. Authors have no financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence this work.
References
- 1.Maris JM. Recent advances in neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(23):2202–2211. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804577. 362/23/2202 [pii] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.van Noesel MM, Versteeg R. Pediatric neuroblastomas: genetic and epigenetic ‘danse macabre’. Gene. 2004;325:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2003.09.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Matthay KK, Villablanca JG, Seeger RC, Stram DO, Harris RE, Ramsay NK, Swift P, Shimada H, Black CT, Brodeur GM, Gerbing RB, Reynolds CP. Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with intensive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and 13-cis-retinoic acid. Children’s Cancer Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(16):1165–1173. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910143411601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Schwab M, Varmus HE, Bishop JM. Amplification of N-myc in untreated human neuroblastomas correlates with advanced disease stage. Science. 1984;224 (4653):1121–1124. doi: 10.1126/science.6719137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mosse YP, Laudenslager M, Longo L, Cole KA, Wood A, Attiyeh EF, Laquaglia MJ, Sennett R, Lynch JE, Perri P, Laureys G, Speleman F, Kim C, Hou C, Hakonarson H, Torkamani A, Schork NJ, Brodeur GM, Tonini GP, Rappaport E, Devoto M, Maris JM. Identification of ALK as a major familial neuroblastoma predisposition gene. Nature. 2008;455(7215):930–935. doi: 10.1038/nature07261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yu AL, Gilman AL, Ozkaynak MF, London WB, Kreissman SG, Chen HX, Smith M, Anderson B, Villablanca JG, Matthay KK, Shimada H, Grupp SA, Seeger R, Reynolds CP, Buxton A, Reisfeld RA, Gillies SD, Cohn SL, Maris JM, Sondel PM. Anti-GD2 antibody with GM-CSF, interleukin-2, and isotretinoin for neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(14):1324–1334. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911123. Children’s Oncology G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Felbor U, Kessler B, Mothes W, Goebel HH, Ploegh HL, Bronson RT, Olsen BR. Neuronal loss and brain atrophy in mice lacking cathepsins B and L. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(12):7883–7888. doi: 10.1073/pnas.112632299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ambroso JL, Harris C. In vitro embryotoxicity of the cysteine proteinase inhibitors benzyloxycarbonyl-phenylalanine-alanine-diazomethane (Z-Phe-Ala-CHN2) and benzyloxycarbonyl-phenylalanine-phenylalanine-diazomethane (Z-Phe-Phe-CHN2) Teratology. 1994;50(3):214–228. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420500307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mason RW, Stabley DL, Picerno GN, Frenck J, Xing S, Bertenshaw GP, Sol-Church K. Evolution of placental proteases. Biological chemistry. 2002;383(7–8):1113–1118. doi: 10.1515/BC.2002.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mason RW. Emerging functions of placental cathepsins. Placenta. 2008;29(5):385–390. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Falgueyret JP, Desmarais S, Oballa R, Black WC, Cromlish W, Khougaz K, Lamontagne S, Masse F, Riendeau D, Toulmond S, Percival MD. Lysosomotropism of basic cathepsin K inhibitors contributes to increased cellular potencies against off-target cathepsins and reduced functional selectivity. J Med Chem. 2005;48(24):7535–7543. doi: 10.1021/jm0504961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Desmarais S, Black WC, Oballa R, Lamontagne S, Riendeau D, Tawa P, Duong le T, Pickarski M, Percival MD. Effect of cathepsin k inhibitor basicity on in vivo off-target activities. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;73(1):147–156. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.039511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Anagli J, Abounit K, Stemmer P, Han Y, Allred L, Weinsheimer S, Movsisyan A, Seyfried D. Effects of cathepsins B and L inhibition on postischemic protein alterations in the brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;366(1):86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.11.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rice D, Barone S., Jr Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models. Environmental health perspectives. 2000;108(Suppl 3):511–533. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s3511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Clancy B, Darlington RB, Finlay BL. Translating developmental time across mammalian species. Neuroscience. 2001;105(1):7–17. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00171-3. S0306-4522(01)00171-3 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Colella R, Lu G, Glazewski L, Korant B, Matlapudi A, England MR, Craft C, Frantz CN, Mason RW. Induction of cell death in neuroblastoma by inhibition of cathepsins B and L. Cancer Lett. 2010;294(2):195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.01.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Crawford C, Mason RW, Wikstrom P, Shaw E. The Design of Peptidyldiazomethane Inhibitors to Distinguish between the Cysteine Proteinases Calpain-Ii, Cathepsin-L and Cathepsin-B. Biochem J. 1988;253 (3):751–758. doi: 10.1042/bj2530751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Xing R, Mason RW. Design of a transferrin-proteinase inhibitor conjugate to probe for active cysteine proteinases in endosomes. Biochem J. 1998;336 (Pt 3):667–673. doi: 10.1042/bj3360667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hassanein M, Bojja AS, Glazewski L, Lu G, Mason RW. Protein processing by the placental protease, cathepsin P. Molecular human reproduction. 2009;15(7):433–442. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gap029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mason RW, Green GDJ, Barrett AJ. Human-Liver Cathepsin-L. Biochemical Journal. 1985;226 (1):233–241. doi: 10.1042/bj2260233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Biroc SL, Gay S, Hummel K, Magill C, Palmer JT, Spencer DR, Sa S, Klaus JL, Michel BA, Rasnick D, Gay RE. Cysteine protease activity is up-regulated in inflamed ankle joints of rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis and decreases with in vivo administration of a vinyl sulfone cysteine protease inhibitor. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2001;44(3):703–711. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200103)44:3<703::AID-ANR120>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sajid M, Robertson SA, Brinen LS, McKerrow JH. Cruzain : the path from target validation to the clinic. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2011;712:100–115. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8414-2_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Behrends C, Sowa ME, Gygi SP, Harper JW. Network organization of the human autophagy system. Nature. 2010;466(7302):68–76. doi: 10.1038/nature09204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Palmer JT, Bryant C, Wang DX, Davis DE, Setti EL, Rydzewski RM, Venkatraman S, Tian ZQ, Burrill LC, Mendonca RV, Springman E, McCarter J, Chung T, Cheung H, Janc JW, McGrath M, Somoza JR, Enriquez P, Yu ZW, Strickley RM, Liu L, Venuti MC, Percival MD, Falgueyret JP, Prasit P, Oballa R, Riendeau D, Young RN, Wesolowski G, Rodan SB, Johnson C, Kimmel DB, Rodan G. Design and synthesis of tri-ring P3 benzamide-containing aminonitriles as potent, selective, orally effective inhibitors of cathepsin K. J Med Chem. 2005;48(24):7520–7534. doi: 10.1021/jm058198r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xing R, Addington AK, Mason RW. Quantification of cathepsins B and L in cells. Biochem J. 1998;332 (Pt 2):499–505. doi: 10.1042/bj3320499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yorimitsu T, Klionsky DJ. Eating the endoplasmic reticulum: quality control by autophagy. Trends Cell Biol. 2007;17 (6):279–285. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kabeya Y, Mizushima N, Ueno T, Yamamoto A, Kirisako T, Noda T, Kominami E, Ohsumi Y, Yoshimori T. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. The EMBO journal. 2000;19(21):5720–5728. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.21.5720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Boya P, Gonzalez-Polo RA, Poncet D, Andreau K, Vieira HL, Roumier T, Perfettini JL, Kroemer G. Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization is a critical step of lysosome-initiated apoptosis induced by hydroxychloroquine. Oncogene. 2003;22 (25):3927–3936. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Boya P, Kroemer G. Lysosomal membrane permeabilization in cell death. Oncogene. 2008;27 (50):6434–6451. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Eisenberg-Lerner A, Bialik S, Simon HU, Kimchi A. Life and death partners: apoptosis, autophagy and the crosstalk between them. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16(7):966–975. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xing RY, Wu F, Mason RW. Control of breast tumor cell growth using a targeted cysteine protease inhibitor. Cancer Research. 1998;58 (5):904–909. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tu C, Ortega-Cava CF, Chen G, Fernandes ND, Cavallo-Medved D, Sloane BF, Band V, Band H. Lysosomal cathepsin B participates in the podosome-mediated extracellular matrix degradation and invasion via secreted lysosomes in v-Src fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 2008;68 (22):9147–9156. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chang SH, Kanasaki K, Gocheva V, Blum G, Harper J, Moses MA, Shih SC, Nagy JA, Joyce J, Bogyo M, Kalluri R, Dvorak HF. VEGF-A induces angiogenesis by perturbing the cathepsin-cysteine protease inhibitor balance in venules, causing basement membrane degradation and mother vessel formation. Cancer Res. 2009;69(10):4537–4544. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4539. 0008-5472.CAN-08-4539 [pii] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Burden RE, Gormley JA, Jaquin TJ, Small DM, Quinn DJ, Hegarty SM, Ward C, Walker B, Johnston JA, Olwill SA, Scott CJ. Antibody-mediated inhibition of cathepsin S blocks colorectal tumor invasion and angiogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(19):6042–6051. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Perez-Castrillon JL, Pinacho F, De Luis D, Lopez-Menendez M, Duenas Laita A. Odanacatib, a new drug for the treatment of osteoporosis: review of the results in postmenopausal women. Journal of osteoporosis. 2010;2010 doi: 10.4061/2010/401581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Doyle PS, Zhou YM, Engel JC, McKerrow JH. A cysteine protease inhibitor cures Chagas’ disease in an immunodeficient-mouse model of infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(11):3932–3939. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00436-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




