Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Oct 13;68(Pt 11):o3127. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812040718

2,2′-Diiodo­azobenzene

Philip J W Elder a, Ignacio Vargas-Baca a,*
PMCID: PMC3515232  PMID: 23284452

Abstract

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, C12H8I2N2 [systematic name: (E)-bis­(2-iodo­phen­yl)diazene], exhibits an essentially planar trans geometry [maximum deviation = 0.022 (4) Å] with the iodine atoms ortho to the azo bridge. In the crystal, offset π-stacking leads to the formation of columns along the a axis [closest C⋯C distance = 3.383 (4) Å].

Related literature  

For analogous 2,2′-dichloro­azobenzenes, see: Komeyama et al. (1973); Crispini et al. (1998). For the structure of a related o-halogenated azobenzene, see: Wragg et al. (2011).graphic file with name e-68-o3127-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C12H8I2N2

  • M r = 433.88

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 4.6306 (3) Å

  • b = 18.1105 (12) Å

  • c = 15.3748 (10) Å

  • β = 98.532 (1)°

  • V = 1275.10 (14) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 4.91 mm−1

  • T = 296 K

  • 0.63 × 0.09 × 0.04 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: analytical (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) T min = 0.322, T max = 0.873

  • 16726 measured reflections

  • 3186 independent reflections

  • 2536 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.027

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.027

  • wR(F 2) = 0.059

  • S = 1.03

  • 3186 reflections

  • 145 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.56 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.56 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell refinement: SMART (Bruker, 2000); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812040718/tk5154sup1.cif

e-68-o3127-sup1.cif (17.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812040718/tk5154Isup2.hkl

e-68-o3127-Isup2.hkl (153.1KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812040718/tk5154Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The molecules of 2,2'-diiodoazobenzene exhibit a trans geometry with the iodine atoms in positions ortho to the azo bridge and opposite the N═N double bond (Fig. 1). The molecules are nearly planar, with the maximum deviation from the average plane being 0.022 (4) Å for atom I1. The aromatic rings of 2,2'-diiodoazobenzene are nearly co-planar with each other (interplanar angle = 0.08 (3)°) and with the azo bridge (N1—N2—C7—C12 = 0.5 (4)°; N2—N1—C1—C6 = -0.1 (4)°). These features are also observed in the structure of 2-iodoazobenzene (Wragg et al., 2011). In contrast, the structures of dichloro analogues display parallel aromatic rings that are rotated from the plane of the azo bridge with N—N—C—C angles = 14.30 (6)° and -14.30 (6)° (Komeyama et al., 1973), and 14.4 (3)° and -14.4 (1)° (Crispini et al., 1998); the corresponding interplanar distances are 0.173 (1) and 0.351 (3) Å, respectively. Such structural differences are likely linked to the presence of intermolecular contacts in the structures of the iodo derivatives and their absence in the dichloro compounds. An offset π-stacking pattern (Fig. 2) allows significant overlap of adjacent molecules. The shortest intermolecular contact in 2,2'-diiodoazobenzene is between C1 and C7* (3.383 (4) Å, cf. sum of van der Waals radii = 3.40 Å; symmetry operation: 1+x, y, z). The stacking leads a columnar arrangement along a (Fig. 3). A herringbone pattern is observed perpendicular to the c axis (Fig. 4).

Experimental

Azobenzene (0.184 g, 1.01 mmol) and mercury trifluoroacetate (0.43 g, 1.01 mmol) were combined with freshly distilled trifluoroacetic acid (0.13 mL) under a nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was heated with stirring for 4 h at 68 °C, after which a concentrated solution of sodium chloride (0.345 g, 5.90 mmol) and sodium acetate (2.085 g, 14.7 mmol) was added and the entire sample was placed in an ultrasonic bath for 20 min. After decanting the solvent, a mixture of iodine (0.279 g, 1.10 mmol) in methanol was added. With time, orange crystals of 2,2'-diiodoazobenzene grew from the solution and were collected by filtration. Yield = 0.047 g, 10%.

Refinement

Carbon-bound H-atoms were placed in calculated positions (C–H 0.93 Å) and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation with Uiso(H) set to 1.2Ueq(C).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Perspective view of the crystal structure of 2,2'-diiodoazobenzene. Atoms are represented by their anisotropic displacement ellipsoids at 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are displayed as fixed-size spheres of 0.35 Å radius.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Intermolecular C1—C7* contacts (- - -) in the crystal of 2,2'-diiodoazobenzene. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Packing diagram of 2,2'-diiodoazobenzene viewed along the a axis. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Packing diagram of 2,2'-diiodoazobenzene viewed along the c axis. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

Crystal data

C12H8I2N2 F(000) = 800
Mr = 433.88 Dx = 2.261 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 4767 reflections
a = 4.6306 (3) Å θ = 2.6–24.6°
b = 18.1105 (12) Å µ = 4.91 mm1
c = 15.3748 (10) Å T = 296 K
β = 98.532 (1)° Rod, orange
V = 1275.10 (14) Å3 0.63 × 0.09 × 0.04 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer 3186 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2536 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.027
φ and ω scans θmax = 28.4°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: analytical (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) h = −4→6
Tmin = 0.322, Tmax = 0.873 k = −24→22
16726 measured reflections l = −20→18

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.059 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0243P)2 + 0.9205P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3186 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
145 parameters Δρmax = 0.56 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.56 e Å3

Special details

Experimental. Azobenzene (0.184 g, 1.01 mmol) and mercury trifluoroacetate (0.43 g, 1.01 mmol) were combined with freshly distilled trifluoroacetic acid (0.13 mL) under a nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was heated with stirring during 4 h at 68°C, after which a concentrated solution of sodium chloride (0.345 g, 5.90 mmol) and sodium acetate (2.085 g, 14.7 mmol) was added and the entire sample was placed in an ultrasonic bath for 20 min. After decanting the solvent, a mixture of iodine (0.279 g, 1.10 mmol) in methanol was added. With time, crystals of 2,2'-diiodoazobenzene grew from the solution and were collected by filtration. Yield = 0.047 g, 10%.
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 1.0033 (6) 0.62044 (15) 0.74337 (19) 0.0362 (6)
C2 1.1608 (6) 0.67355 (16) 0.7950 (2) 0.0391 (6)
C3 1.3471 (7) 0.72094 (17) 0.7587 (2) 0.0469 (7)
C4 1.3732 (7) 0.71515 (18) 0.6711 (2) 0.0511 (8)
C5 1.2147 (7) 0.66291 (18) 0.6191 (2) 0.0447 (7)
C6 1.0330 (7) 0.61521 (17) 0.6548 (2) 0.0440 (7)
I1 1.12360 (6) 0.685129 (15) 0.927841 (16) 0.06511 (10)
H1 1.4537 0.7564 0.7936 0.056*
H2 1.4983 0.7466 0.6468 0.061*
H3 1.2306 0.6599 0.5596 0.054*
H4 0.9297 0.5794 0.6196 0.053*
N1 0.8151 (5) 0.57362 (13) 0.78379 (16) 0.0409 (6)
N2 0.6804 (5) 0.52810 (14) 0.73326 (16) 0.0400 (5)
C7 0.4922 (6) 0.48055 (16) 0.77216 (18) 0.0366 (6)
C8 0.3371 (6) 0.42818 (16) 0.71848 (19) 0.0380 (6)
C9 0.1496 (6) 0.37976 (17) 0.7525 (2) 0.0451 (7)
C10 0.1187 (7) 0.38397 (18) 0.8396 (2) 0.0511 (8)
C11 0.2731 (7) 0.43536 (19) 0.8935 (2) 0.0494 (8)
C12 0.4562 (7) 0.48416 (18) 0.8602 (2) 0.0480 (8)
I2 0.37973 (5) 0.421268 (15) 0.585578 (15) 0.06002 (9)
H5 0.0457 0.3447 0.7163 0.054*
H6 −0.0076 0.3518 0.8624 0.061*
H7 0.2537 0.4371 0.9528 0.059*
H8 0.5561 0.5196 0.8967 0.058*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0328 (14) 0.0323 (15) 0.0429 (16) 0.0017 (12) 0.0041 (12) 0.0035 (12)
C2 0.0373 (15) 0.0366 (16) 0.0435 (16) 0.0024 (12) 0.0062 (12) −0.0016 (12)
C3 0.0422 (17) 0.0358 (17) 0.063 (2) −0.0028 (13) 0.0096 (15) 0.0017 (14)
C4 0.0454 (18) 0.0444 (19) 0.067 (2) 0.0018 (15) 0.0191 (16) 0.0139 (16)
C5 0.0493 (18) 0.0481 (18) 0.0387 (16) 0.0036 (14) 0.0138 (14) 0.0088 (13)
C6 0.0478 (17) 0.0414 (18) 0.0429 (17) −0.0018 (14) 0.0063 (14) −0.0012 (13)
I1 0.07890 (19) 0.07058 (18) 0.04761 (14) −0.02011 (13) 0.01516 (12) −0.01476 (11)
N1 0.0414 (13) 0.0395 (14) 0.0417 (14) −0.0054 (11) 0.0055 (11) 0.0003 (11)
N2 0.0386 (13) 0.0388 (14) 0.0420 (13) −0.0048 (11) 0.0040 (11) 0.0009 (11)
C7 0.0339 (14) 0.0373 (16) 0.0384 (15) 0.0009 (12) 0.0045 (12) 0.0029 (12)
C8 0.0377 (15) 0.0369 (16) 0.0393 (15) 0.0032 (12) 0.0051 (12) 0.0028 (12)
C9 0.0412 (16) 0.0395 (17) 0.0541 (19) −0.0053 (13) 0.0050 (14) −0.0001 (14)
C10 0.0509 (19) 0.049 (2) 0.056 (2) −0.0044 (15) 0.0161 (16) 0.0109 (16)
C11 0.059 (2) 0.055 (2) 0.0338 (15) −0.0093 (16) 0.0077 (14) 0.0050 (14)
C12 0.0529 (19) 0.0504 (19) 0.0393 (16) −0.0092 (15) 0.0030 (14) −0.0020 (14)
I2 0.07077 (17) 0.06949 (17) 0.04103 (13) −0.01261 (12) 0.01232 (11) −0.01094 (10)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—C2 1.384 (4) N2—C7 1.419 (3)
C2—C3 1.391 (4) C7—C8 1.386 (4)
C3—C4 1.374 (5) C8—C9 1.390 (4)
C4—C5 1.378 (5) C9—C10 1.370 (4)
C5—C6 1.375 (4) C10—C11 1.374 (5)
C6—C1 1.393 (4) C11—C12 1.374 (4)
C2—I1 2.085 (3) C12—C7 1.390 (4)
C3—H1 0.9300 C8—I2 2.086 (3)
C4—H2 0.9300 C9—H5 0.9300
C5—H3 0.9300 C10—H6 0.9300
C6—H4 0.9300 C11—H7 0.9300
C1—N1 1.423 (3) C12—H8 0.9300
N1—N2 1.236 (3)
C1—C2—C3 120.3 (3) N1—N2—C7 115.1 (2)
C2—C3—C4 119.7 (3) C7—C8—C9 120.3 (3)
C3—C4—C5 120.3 (3) C8—C9—C10 119.6 (3)
C4—C5—C6 120.3 (3) C9—C10—C11 120.4 (3)
C5—C6—C1 120.1 (3) C10—C11—C12 120.4 (3)
C6—C1—C2 119.2 (3) C11—C12—C7 120.1 (3)
C1—C2—I1 121.2 (2) C12—C7—N2 123.5 (3)
C3—C2—I1 118.5 (2) C8—C7—C12 119.1 (3)
C2—C3—H1 120.1 C8—C7—N2 117.4 (2)
C4—C3—H1 120.1 C7—C8—I2 120.6 (2)
C3—C4—H2 119.9 C9—C8—I2 119.1 (2)
C5—C4—H2 119.9 C8—C9—H5 120.2
C4—C5—H3 119.8 C10—C9—H5 120.2
C6—C5—H3 119.8 C9—C10—H6 119.8
C5—C6—H4 119.9 C11—C10—H6 119.8
C1—C6—H4 119.9 C10—C11—H7 119.8
C6—C1—N1 122.8 (3) C12—C11—H7 119.8
C2—C1—N1 117.9 (3) C11—C12—H8 119.9
C1—N1—N2 114.0 (2) C7—C12—H8 119.9

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: TK5154).

References

  1. Bruker (2000). SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Crispini, A., Ghedini, M. & Pucci, D. (1998). Acta Cryst. C54, 1869–1871.
  3. Komeyama, M., Yamamoto, S., Nishimura, N. & Hasegawa, S. (1973). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 46, 2606–2607.
  4. Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Wragg, D. S., Ahmed, M. A. K., Nilsen, O. & Fjellvåg, H. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o2326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812040718/tk5154sup1.cif

e-68-o3127-sup1.cif (17.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812040718/tk5154Isup2.hkl

e-68-o3127-Isup2.hkl (153.1KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812040718/tk5154Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES