Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Oct 31;68(Pt 11):o3253. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812044467

Piperidine-1-carboximidamide

Ioannis Tiritiris a,*
PMCID: PMC3515330  PMID: 23284550

Abstract

In the title compound, C6H13N3, the C=N and C—N bond lengths in the CN3 unit are 1.3090 (17), and 1.3640 (17) (C–NH2) and 1.3773 (16) Å, indicating double- and single-bond character, respectively. The N—C—N angles are 116.82 (12), 119.08 (11) and 124.09 (11)°, showing a deviation of the CN3 plane from an ideal trigonal–planar geometry. The piperidine ring is in a chair conformation. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked by N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, forming a two-dimensional network along the ac plane.

Related literature  

For the crystal structure of 4-morpholine­carboxamidine, see: Tiritiris (2012). For the crystal structure of bis­(piperidin-1-yl)methanone, see: Betz et al. (2011).graphic file with name e-68-o3253-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C6H13N3

  • M r = 127.19

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 12.2193 (9) Å

  • b = 5.5784 (5) Å

  • c = 10.4885 (7) Å

  • β = 91.887 (4)°

  • V = 714.55 (10) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.60 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.45 × 0.26 × 0.06 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker Kappa APEXII DUO diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (Blessing, 1995) T min = 0.830, T max = 0.965

  • 4190 measured reflections

  • 1413 independent reflections

  • 1116 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.049

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.045

  • wR(F 2) = 0.112

  • S = 1.03

  • 1413 reflections

  • 94 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2008); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044467/go2073sup1.cif

e-68-o3253-sup1.cif (17.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044467/go2073Isup2.hkl

e-68-o3253-Isup2.hkl (69.8KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044467/go2073Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H21⋯N1i 0.94 (2) 2.15 (2) 3.071 (1) 168 (1)
N2—H22⋯N1ii 0.94 (2) 2.15 (2) 3.090 (1) 177 (1)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Dr W. Frey (Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart) for measuring the crystal data.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

1-Piperidinecarboxamidine, a guanidine derivative bearing one piperidine moiety, is similar to the structurally known compound 4-morpholinecarboxamidine (Tiritiris, 2012). Our efforts to study guanidines for CO2 capturing, led to the preparation of the title compound. Because its crystal structure was previously unknown, it was decided to conduct an investigation. According to the structure analysis, the C1–N1 bond in the title compound is 1.3090 (17) Å, indicating double bond character. The bond lengths C1–N2 = 1.3640 (17) Å and C1–N3 = 1.3773 (16) Å are elongated and characteristic for a C–N amine single bond (Fig. 1). The N–C1–N angles are: 116.82 (12)° (N2–C1–N3), 119.08 (11)° (N1–C1–N3) and 124.09 (11)° (N1–C1–N2), showing a deviation of the CN3 plane from an ideal trigonal-planar geometry (Fig. 1). The structural parameters of the piperidine ring in the here presented title compound agree very well with the data obtained from the X-ray analysis of the urea bis(piperidin-1-yl)methanone (Betz et al., 2011). In both crystal structures the piperidine rings adopt a chair conformation. In contrast to the structure of 4-morpholinecarboxamidine (Tiritiris, 2012), only strong N—H···N hydrogen bonds between nitrogen atoms of neighboring molecules (Fig. 2 and 3) are present [d(H···N) = 2.15 (2) Å] (Tab. 1), forming an infinite two-dimensional network (base vectors [0 0 1] and [0 1 0]). Surprisingly, the imine hydrogen atom H11 is not involved in the hydrogen bonding system.

Experimental

1-Piperidine-carboxamidinium sulfate (I) was prepared by heating one equivalent O-methylisourea sulfate with two equivalents of piperidine under reflux. The methanol formed in the reaction was distilled off and (I) precipitated in nearly quantitative yield. To a solution of 5.0 g (14 mmol) (I) in 50 ml water, a solution of 1.2 g (30 mmol) sodium hydroxide dissolved in 25 ml water was added dropwise under ice cooling. After warming to room temperature the aqueous phase was extracted with diethyl ether. The organic phase was finally dried over sodium sulfate. After evaporation of the solvent, the title compound precipitated in form of a colorless solid. Yield: 1.5 g (84%). During the storage of a saturated acetonitrile solution at 0° C, colorless single crystals of the title compound suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3CN/TMS): δ = 1.60–1.64 [m, 6 H, –CH2], 3.38–3.42 [m, 4 H,–CH2], 5.85 [s, 1 H, –NH], 6.19 [s, 2 H, –NH2]. 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3CN/TMS): δ = 23.2 (–CH2), 24.7 (–CH2), 46.5 (–CH2), 157.4 (C═N).

Refinement

The N-bound H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and were refined freely [N—H = 0.91 (2)–0.94 (2) Å]. The hydrogen atoms of the methylene groups were placed in calculated positions with d(C—H) = 0.99 Å. They were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with U(H) set to 1.2 Ueq(C).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular structure of the title compound with displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

N–H···N hydrogen bonds between neighboring molecules, ac-view. The hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed lines.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

N–H···N hydrogen bonds generating a two-dimensional network, ac-view. The hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed lines.

Crystal data

C6H13N3 F(000) = 280
Mr = 127.19 Dx = 1.182 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Melting point: 409 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
a = 12.2193 (9) Å Cell parameters from 4190 reflections
b = 5.5784 (5) Å θ = 3.6–73.5°
c = 10.4885 (7) Å µ = 0.60 mm1
β = 91.887 (4)° T = 100 K
V = 714.55 (10) Å3 Plate, colorless
Z = 4 0.45 × 0.26 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

Bruker Kappa APEXII DUO diffractometer 1413 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube 1116 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.049
φ scans, and ω scans θmax = 73.5°, θmin = 3.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (Blessing, 1995) h = −15→15
Tmin = 0.830, Tmax = 0.965 k = −6→6
4190 measured reflections l = −12→12

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045 Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.112 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0625P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1413 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
94 parameters Δρmax = 0.19 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.21 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.38570 (11) 0.2272 (2) 0.20721 (12) 0.0194 (3)
N1 0.41982 (10) 0.26476 (18) 0.32513 (11) 0.0229 (3)
H11 0.4665 (14) 0.393 (3) 0.3256 (16) 0.031 (4)*
N2 0.40843 (11) 0.37432 (19) 0.10763 (12) 0.0248 (3)
H21 0.4040 (14) 0.315 (3) 0.0240 (18) 0.037 (4)*
H22 0.4598 (14) 0.497 (3) 0.1251 (15) 0.035 (4)*
N3 0.32466 (10) 0.02529 (17) 0.17918 (10) 0.0225 (3)
C2 0.25890 (12) −0.0007 (2) 0.06138 (13) 0.0270 (4)
H2A 0.2591 −0.1706 0.0341 0.032*
H2B 0.2915 0.0964 −0.0067 0.032*
C3 0.14128 (12) 0.0807 (2) 0.08029 (14) 0.0279 (4)
H3A 0.1403 0.2540 0.1006 0.034*
H3B 0.0972 0.0553 0.0005 0.034*
C4 0.09150 (13) −0.0602 (2) 0.18847 (14) 0.0275 (3)
H4A 0.0179 0.0040 0.2054 0.033*
H4B 0.0833 −0.2304 0.1631 0.033*
C5 0.16364 (12) −0.0434 (2) 0.30906 (14) 0.0273 (4)
H5A 0.1341 −0.1493 0.3754 0.033*
H5B 0.1629 0.1231 0.3416 0.033*
C6 0.28172 (12) −0.1171 (2) 0.28289 (13) 0.0246 (3)
H6A 0.3282 −0.0937 0.3610 0.030*
H6B 0.2837 −0.2892 0.2600 0.030*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0203 (7) 0.0167 (6) 0.0211 (7) 0.0021 (4) 0.0004 (5) −0.0011 (4)
N1 0.0271 (7) 0.0187 (5) 0.0228 (6) −0.0023 (4) −0.0013 (5) −0.0015 (4)
N2 0.0335 (7) 0.0211 (5) 0.0196 (6) −0.0053 (5) −0.0011 (5) −0.0009 (4)
N3 0.0256 (7) 0.0203 (5) 0.0214 (6) −0.0032 (4) −0.0036 (5) 0.0001 (4)
C2 0.0329 (9) 0.0261 (6) 0.0218 (7) −0.0065 (5) −0.0021 (6) −0.0037 (5)
C3 0.0309 (9) 0.0274 (6) 0.0249 (8) −0.0016 (6) −0.0091 (6) 0.0017 (5)
C4 0.0261 (8) 0.0268 (7) 0.0295 (8) 0.0009 (5) −0.0013 (6) −0.0002 (5)
C5 0.0313 (9) 0.0251 (6) 0.0254 (8) −0.0022 (5) 0.0012 (6) 0.0016 (5)
C6 0.0292 (8) 0.0197 (6) 0.0247 (7) −0.0019 (5) −0.0040 (6) 0.0048 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—N1 1.3090 (17) C3—C4 1.5235 (19)
C1—N2 1.3640 (17) C3—H3A 0.9900
C1—N3 1.3773 (16) C3—H3B 0.9900
N1—H11 0.913 (17) C4—C5 1.521 (2)
N2—H21 0.937 (18) C4—H4A 0.9900
N2—H22 0.943 (17) C4—H4B 0.9900
N3—C6 1.4585 (17) C5—C6 1.534 (2)
N3—C2 1.4587 (17) C5—H5A 0.9900
C2—C3 1.526 (2) C5—H5B 0.9900
C2—H2A 0.9900 C6—H6A 0.9900
C2—H2B 0.9900 C6—H6B 0.9900
N1—C1—N2 124.09 (11) C2—C3—H3B 109.6
N1—C1—N3 119.08 (11) H3A—C3—H3B 108.2
N2—C1—N3 116.82 (12) C5—C4—C3 110.67 (12)
C1—N1—H11 108.1 (11) C5—C4—H4A 109.5
C1—N2—H21 119.8 (10) C3—C4—H4A 109.5
C1—N2—H22 116.1 (10) C5—C4—H4B 109.5
H21—N2—H22 117.2 (14) C3—C4—H4B 109.5
C1—N3—C6 119.46 (11) H4A—C4—H4B 108.1
C1—N3—C2 122.78 (10) C4—C5—C6 110.95 (12)
C6—N3—C2 112.09 (10) C4—C5—H5A 109.4
N3—C2—C3 110.80 (11) C6—C5—H5A 109.4
N3—C2—H2A 109.5 C4—C5—H5B 109.4
C3—C2—H2A 109.5 C6—C5—H5B 109.4
N3—C2—H2B 109.5 H5A—C5—H5B 108.0
C3—C2—H2B 109.5 N3—C6—C5 110.55 (11)
H2A—C2—H2B 108.1 N3—C6—H6A 109.5
C4—C3—C2 110.12 (11) C5—C6—H6A 109.5
C4—C3—H3A 109.6 N3—C6—H6B 109.5
C2—C3—H3A 109.6 C5—C6—H6B 109.5
C4—C3—H3B 109.6 H6A—C6—H6B 108.1
N1—C1—N3—C6 11.63 (18) N3—C2—C3—C4 −56.89 (14)
N2—C1—N3—C6 −169.57 (11) C2—C3—C4—C5 53.91 (15)
N1—C1—N3—C2 162.94 (12) C3—C4—C5—C6 −53.30 (14)
N2—C1—N3—C2 −18.25 (18) C1—N3—C6—C5 95.35 (14)
C1—N3—C2—C3 −93.09 (14) C2—N3—C6—C5 −58.83 (14)
C6—N3—C2—C3 60.10 (13) C4—C5—C6—N3 55.17 (13)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N2—H21···N1i 0.94 (2) 2.15 (2) 3.071 (1) 168 (1)
N2—H22···N1ii 0.94 (2) 2.15 (2) 3.090 (1) 177 (1)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (ii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: GO2073).

References

  1. Betz, R., Gerber, T. & Schalekamp, H. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33–38. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2005). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  4. Bruker (2008). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Tiritiris, I. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o3118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044467/go2073sup1.cif

e-68-o3253-sup1.cif (17.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044467/go2073Isup2.hkl

e-68-o3253-Isup2.hkl (69.8KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044467/go2073Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES