Skip to main content
The Texas Heart Institute Journal logoLink to The Texas Heart Institute Journal
. 1982 Jun;9(2):177–184.

Clinical Carotid Measurements: Present and Future State

DE Strandness Jr 1
PMCID: PMC351609  PMID: 15226956

Abstract

The most satisfactory methods of evaluating the carotid artery have included Doppler imaging and ultrasonic duplex scanning. It is now recognized that these techniques are most accurate when used in combination with spectral analysis to more objectively determine the flow patterns present across this important bifurcation. In the centers where there is the most experience in their use, the sensitivity of the methods approach 90% and are most accurate for detecting high-grade stenoses (greater than 50% diameter reduction). The most promising future applications include the use of computerized pattern recognition techniques to quantitatively separate patients with varying degrees of disease.

Full text

PDF
177

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blackshear W. M., Jr, Phillips D. J., Thiele B. L., Hirsch J. H., Chikos P. M., Marinelli M. R., Ward K. J., Strandness D. E., Jr Detection of carotid occlusive disease by ultrasonic imaging and pulsed Doppler spectrum analysis. Surgery. 1979 Nov;86(5):698–706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bone G. E., Barnes R. W. Limitations of the Doppler cerebrovascular examination in hemispheric cerebral ischemia. Surgery. 1976 May;79(5):577–580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Duncan G. W., Gruber J. O., Dewey C. F., Jr, Myers G. S., Lees R. S. Evaluation of carotid stenosis by phonoangiography. N Engl J Med. 1975 Nov 27;293(22):1124–1128. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197511272932205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greene F. M., Jr, Beach K., Strandness D. E., Jr, Fell G., Phillips D. J. Computer based pattern recognition of carotid arterial disease using pulsed Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1982;8(2):161–176. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(82)90095-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hokanson D. E., Mozersky D. J., Sumner D. S., McLeod F. D., Jr, Strandness D. E., Jr Ultrasonic arteriography. A noninvasive method of arterial visualization. Radiology. 1972 Feb;102(2):435–436. doi: 10.1148/102.2.435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kartchner M. M., McRae L. P. Noninvasive evaluation and management of the "asymptomatic" carotid bruit. Surgery. 1977 Dec;82(6):840–847. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Spencer M. P., Reid J. M., Davis D. L., Paulson P. S. Cervical carotid imaging with a continuous-wave Doppler flowmeter. Stroke. 1974 Mar-Apr;5(2):145–154. doi: 10.1161/01.str.5.2.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Thiele B. L., Young J. V., Chikos P. M., Hirsch J. H., Strandness D. E., Jr Correlation of arteriographic findings and symptoms in cerebrovascular disease. Neurology. 1980 Oct;30(10):1041–1046. doi: 10.1212/wnl.30.10.1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Texas Heart Institute Journal are provided here courtesy of Texas Heart Institute

RESOURCES