Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Texas Heart Institute Journal logoLink to The Texas Heart Institute Journal
. 1982 Sep;9(3):335–343.

Detection of Early Atherosclerosis in M. Fascicularis with Transcutaneous Ultrasonic Measurement of the Elastic Properties of the Common Carotid Artery

David J Farrar 1,*, Ward A Riley 1, M Gene Bond 1, Ralph N Barnes 1, L Alan Love 1
PMCID: PMC351640  PMID: 15226937

Abstract

The elastic properties of 22 common carotid arteries from 13 male cynomolgus monkeys (M. fascicularis) that were fed either a high cholesterol (test) diet or a standard monkey chow (control) diet for 18 months were measured noninvasively with 5MHz ultrasound. A B-mode image of the artery was obtained with a 32-element linear array transducer, and a single line of video ultrasonic information was selected for tracking the echoes from the adventitial side of the near wall to the lumen-intima interface of the far wall. This technique measured lumen diameter plus anterior wall thickness. The diastolic diameter (Dd) (mean ± SEM) of the test arteries was slightly larger than controls (2.9 ± 0.1 vs 2.5 ± 0.1 mm), whereas the fractional diameter change from diastole to systole (ΔD/Dd, where ΔD = diameter change) was slightly less (0.062 ± 0.010 vs 0.082 ± 0.011). Direct subclavian artery pulse pressure (ΔP) in the test animals (63 ± 4 mm Hg) was significantly greater than in the controls (41 ± 2 mm Hg), whereas there was no difference in diastolic pressure (85 ± 3 vs 81 ± 2), respectively. The pressure-strain elastic modulus Ep = (ΔP/ΔD) Dd was significantly greater in the test monkeys (182 ± 33 kPa) than in the controls (73 ± 9 kPa). Morphometric analysis of atherosclerosis revealed more connective tissue and intra- and extracellular lipids in the test arteries than in the controls. Based on the average of three cross-sections equally spaced along each common carotid artery, the intimal area and the maximal intimal thickness averaged 0.89 ± 0.16 mm2 and 0.26 ± 0.04 mm for the test monkeys compared to negligible intimae from the controls. Medial area also was significantly greater in the test monkeys (0.71 ± 0.03 mm2) compared to controls (0.57 ± 0.04 mm2). Percentage stenosis defined as intimal area/IEL area, where IEL area is that within the internal elastic lamina, showed the test arteries to have 30 ± 5% stenosis compared to 0% for the controls. However, dilatation appeared to compensate for any loss in lumen area due to intimal thickening. In this study, significant carotid artery stiffening associated with diet-induced atherosclerosis is demonstrated. This noninvasive technique may be useful in pediatrics and in preventive medicine for the detection of arterial stiffening associated with early progressive atherosclerotic lesions.

Full text

PDF
335

Images in this article

339Image
on p.339
339Image
on p.339
341Image
on p.341

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arndt J. O., Klauske J., Mersch F. The diameter of the intact carotid artery in man and its change with pulse pressure. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1968;301(3):230–240. doi: 10.1007/BF00363770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Farrar D. J., Green H. D., Bond M. G., Wagner W. D., Gobbeé R. A. Aortic pulse wave velocity, elasticity, and composition in a nonhuman primate model of atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 1978 Jul;43(1):52–62. doi: 10.1161/01.res.43.1.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Farrar D. J., Green H. D., Wagner W. D., Bond M. G. Reduction in pulse wave velocity and improvement of aortic distensibility accompanying regression of atherosclerosis in the rhesus monkey. Circ Res. 1980 Sep;47(3):425–432. doi: 10.1161/01.res.47.3.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GREENFIELD J. C., Jr, PATEL D. J. Relation between pressure and diameter in the ascending aorta of man. Circ Res. 1962 May;10:778–781. doi: 10.1161/01.res.10.5.778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GUNN G. C., DOBSON H. L., GRAY J., GEDDES L. A., VALLBONA C. STUDIES OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY IN POTENTIAL DIABETIC SUBJECTS. Diabetes. 1965 Aug;14:489–492. doi: 10.2337/diab.14.8.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Katz H. P., Cheitlin M. D., Wasser A. H., Flair R. C. Observations on the pulse wave velocity and tissue biopsy in children with diabetes mellitus. Johns Hopkins Med J. 1970 Dec;127(6):336–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lunt M. J., Reuben J. R., du Boulay E. P. Preliminary report on some ultrasonic methods for detecting carotid artery disease. J Med Eng Technol. 1978 Nov;2(6):289–297. doi: 10.3109/03091907809161822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mozersky D. J., Sumner D. S., Hokanson D. E., Strandness D. E., Jr Transcutaneous measurement of the elastic properties of the human femoral artery. Circulation. 1972 Nov;46(5):948–955. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.46.5.948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. WOOLAM G. L., SCHNUR P. L., VALLBONA C., HOFF H. E. The pulse wave velocity as an early indicator of atherosclerosis in diabetic subjects. Circulation. 1962 Mar;25:533–539. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.25.3.533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Texas Heart Institute Journal are provided here courtesy of Texas Heart Institute

RESOURCES